Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
Date: 	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:08:28 -0500
From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
To: 	Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Bert Pool 
<[email protected]>
CC: 	Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain 
<[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Lane Wootan 
<[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold 
<[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>



Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and became 
friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics (Southland 
Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets of all size and 
shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing, molding, firing 
and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite magnets. EPA mandated the end 
of the use of barium in the manufacturing process with a strontium 
substitute. The barium magnets became available from Brazil and China. 
Back when I visited with Don Martin and got the dimensions of Sparky's 
magnets  I found them at Edmund Scientific so bought the exact same 
Sweet magnets. I was scrapping sown all the main frame (IBM) computers 
in the DFW area and  found that the early versions of the big hard 
drives had the barium magnets which Joel and I used in the MRA (Mini Sweet).




The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear servos in 
the read write heads.

After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold electrical 
output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) I realized that 
much more had to be learned about this aspect of research. I know you 
were involved to some extent.

See: Sweet attachments in his own words!

Before I got all bogged down with  my Hydrogen Production Process and 
building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had 
formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to be 
made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype magnets built.
Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I 
accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet Project. I 
guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still yet to be realized!  Lol
Norm


On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Lots of stuff here.  I have been busy so need to back and review all.
>
> I did see a reference to barium ferrite.  Sparky sweet said the 
> magnets he used had to be barium ferrite.  Most ceramic magnets of the 
> size he was using are strontium ferrite.  To tell the difference I 
> used, per his instructions, an ohm meter.  One conducts, the other 
> doesn’t.  I forget which way it is.  Somewhere in my collection of 
> boxes I think I have one of his magnets.  I’m still unpackingand 
> organizing  after many, many moves so it will be awhile before I find it.
>
> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used.
>
>
>
>
>
> Toby
>
>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>> Date: 	Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700
>> From: 	[email protected][EVGRAY]<[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: 	[email protected]
>> To: 	[email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting theory Norm,
>>
>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most other 
>> people, I read your patent.
>>
>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference is but 
>> there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or at least a 
>> neutron missing. Very interesting what happens with a Coleman battery 
>> in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems to know what a hole 
>> is, some say it's protons but I think proton electricity is a 
>> different animal.
>>
>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so maybe the 
>> mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it has no neutron 
>> and would only need a proton to gather an electron.  If it shows up 
>> from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning.
>>
>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so we do 
>> agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain forming in a 
>> similar way.  When we have these weather systems starting on the west 
>> cost and dumping billions of gallons all across the country more than 
>> the clouds could ever hold.  As the high and lower clouds commingle I 
>> thing they convert nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen.
>>
>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly without 
>> a ground connection so they are in fact pumps.
>>
>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and then 
>> fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge from a 
>> serious influence machine for the neutral spike.
>>
>> The Felici device sounds like something to build someday.  Also 
>> interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the 
>> Protium state.
>>
>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea too.  I 
>> think there are some deep truths in William Lynes writings even if 
>> some of the whys and wherefores may be misinterpreted.
>>
>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to 
>> pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic alignments and 
>> restructuring. I think Barrium Ferrite might be piezoelectric, don't 
>> recall right now, but either way it seems to be a very good insulator 
>> and something that can fraction electrons from the B field.  I 
>> imagine you played with this stuff quite a bit during your MRA design 
>> and likely noticed some interesting aspects of the material.
>>
>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape heads for 
>> a OU lenz free generator.   He had a single sine wave freq and 
>> claimed he could loop generating electricity in this way as the tape 
>> passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts did not seem to 
>> get loaded down.  Probably just another tuned high impedance system.  
>> Find it interesting as mag tape is mostly barium ferrite particles.
>>
>>
>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential?  Well, here is 
>>> what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on the 
>>> spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background from free 
>>> protons. Please reviewIrving Langmuir 
>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir>  Atomic Hydrogen.  
>>> Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is created in a 30 
>>> atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In the Lanfmuir torch a 
>>> high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond creating monatomic hydrogen 
>>> (atoms).  Same with the Felici Generator, the operating gas is 
>>> Atomic Hydrogen. According to Hal Puthoff, if a hydrogen atom looses 
>>> an electron it is immediately replenished by the Zero Point space 
>>> background.   The Felici Generator is a zero Point Energy Generator 
>>> or PUMP.  I had an interesting discussion with Ken (RIP) Shoulders 
>>> at a New Energy Symposium in Denver. I asked him what type of power 
>>> supply he used in charging his HVDC capacitor banks for the Charged 
>>> Cluster experiments. His reply was an Electrostatic Influence 
>>> Machine (Holtz Machine).  He  said that if you apply a potential of 
>>> lets say 100,000 Volts across a capacitor it will charge because you 
>>> have stressed the dielectric (dielectric displacement). Interesting 
>>> answer to say the least. The charged capacitors will do work. Same 
>>> with the Felici Generator for the 3,000 watt output will do work  
>>> drawing the energy from the space background. See!  Mick, I had to 
>>> answer my own question for nobody thinks about the perplexing 
>>> problems.  Ha! Ha!     Norm
>>>
>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003
>>>
>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
>>>
>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>>
>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / atom, 
>>>>> where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV Electrostatic 
>>>>> Generator??  I have issued this challenge before with no comments.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood.   What is Heat?    
>>>>>> Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes 
>>>>>> due to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons 
>>>>>> until all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW, 
>>>>>> absolute zero conditions, there is no Browning Motion for there 
>>>>>> are no holes for electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy 
>>>>>> not just from the additional in the coil collapse but from the 
>>>>>> neutral spike Norm is on to.  It is elusive because it requires a 
>>>>>> solid negative pulse for that huge power return strike just like 
>>>>>> lighting.  With positive lightening there is no return strike.  
>>>>>> The return mucks up everything silicon so no wonder it has been 
>>>>>> completely engineered around.  It's difficult to get solid 
>>>>>> negative with high voltage as the oscillations provide as you 
>>>>>> know the counter field so the proper neg polarity to input of a 
>>>>>> coil doesn't cut it but is a good start.  This is why Tesla was 
>>>>>> using magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling wave which 
>>>>>> is what he referred to as radiant.  I am sure certain materials 
>>>>>> also contribute to a more pure charge one way or the other just 
>>>>>> like with static charges.  We just have to learn to use the 
>>>>>> proper materials in our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/ 
>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will 
>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) creating 
>>>>>> the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative thunderstorm. 
>>>>>> Moray is interested in the positive lighting producing the sprite 
>>>>>> events over the storms as photographed by the ISIS Space Station. 
>>>>>> (interaction of the Hot positive charge with the Cold Negative 
>>>>>> ionosphere.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   By
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>>> *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist,
>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool
>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is
>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super 
>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of 
>>>>>> using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super conductive 
>>>>>> Tesla Coil primary.   Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink" 
>>>>>> with electron densities of a very high order!   "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> 
>

Norm,

Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the
Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all
slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite
communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems that
maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely
applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this purpose,
could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless power device
might give away the candy store...

I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control. 
Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter.  Do you
think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what is
required to build a prototype?  From the brief description available it
appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source.  Do
you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires you mentioned? 
Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are
more relativistic voltages employed/required?   Interesting I have not
found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and
drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of
Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be
magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found
much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional
mutterings.

I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this effect
so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to get my
thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.


On 7/23/2018 12:48 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
> Date: 	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:08:28 -0500
> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
> To: 	Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Bert Pool
> <[email protected]>
> CC: 	Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain
> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Lane
> Wootan <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Phil
> Rembold <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and became
> friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics (Southland
> Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets of all size and
> shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing, molding, firing
> and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite magnets. EPA mandated the
> end of the use of barium in the manufacturing process with a strontium
> substitute. The barium magnets became available from Brazil and China.
> Back when I visited with Don Martin and got the dimensions of Sparky's
> magnets  I found them at Edmund Scientific so bought the exact same
> Sweet magnets. I was scrapping sown all the main frame  (IBM)
> computers in the DFW area and  found that the early versions of the
> big hard drives had the barium magnets which Joel and I used in the
> MRA (Mini Sweet).
>
>
>
>
> The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear servos in
> the read write heads.
>
> After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold electrical
> output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) I realized that
> much more had to be learned about this aspect of research. I know you
> were involved to some extent.
>
> See: Sweet attachments in his own words!
>
> Before I got all bogged down with  my Hydrogen Production Process and
> building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had
> formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to be
> made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype magnets built.
> Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I
> accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet Project.
> I guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still yet to be
> realized!  Lol
> Norm
>
>
> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Lots of stuff here.  I have been busy so need to back and review all.
>>
>> I did see a reference to barium ferrite.  Sparky sweet said the
>> magnets he used had to be barium ferrite.  Most ceramic magnets of
>> the size he was using are strontium ferrite.  To tell the difference
>> I used, per his instructions, an ohm meter.  One conducts, the other
>> doesn’t.  I forget which way it is.  Somewhere in my collection of
>> boxes I think I have one of his magnets.  I’m still unpackingand
>> organizing  after many, many moves so it will be awhile before I find it.
>>
>> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Toby
>>
>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>> Date: 	Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700
>>> From: 	Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: 	[email protected]
>>> To: 	[email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting theory Norm,
>>>
>>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most other
>>> people, I read your patent.
>>>
>>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference is but
>>> there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or at least a
>>> neutron missing.  Very interesting what happens with a Coleman
>>> battery in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems to know
>>> what a hole is, some say it's protons but I think proton electricity
>>> is a different animal.
>>>
>>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so maybe
>>> the mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it has no
>>> neutron and would only need a proton to gather an electron.  If it
>>> shows up from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning.
>>>
>>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so we do
>>> agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain forming in a
>>> similar way.  When we have these weather systems starting on the
>>> west cost and dumping billions of gallons all across the country
>>> more than the clouds could ever hold.  As the high and lower clouds
>>> commingle I thing they convert nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen. 
>>>
>>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly without
>>> a ground connection so they are in fact pumps.
>>>
>>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and then
>>> fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge from a
>>> serious influence machine for the neutral spike.
>>>
>>> The Felici device sounds like something to build someday.  Also
>>> interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the
>>> Protium state.
>>>
>>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea too.  I
>>> think there are some deep truths in William Lynes writings even if
>>> some of the whys and wherefores may be misinterpreted.
>>>
>>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to
>>> pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic alignments and
>>> restructuring.   I think Barrium Ferrite might be piezoelectric,
>>> don't recall right now, but either way it seems to be a very good
>>> insulator and something that can fraction electrons from the B
>>> field.  I imagine you played with this stuff quite a bit during your
>>> MRA design and likely noticed some interesting aspects of the
>>> material.  
>>>
>>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape heads for
>>> a OU lenz free generator.   He had a single sine wave freq and
>>> claimed he could loop generating electricity in this way as the tape
>>> passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts did not seem to
>>> get loaded down.  Probably just another tuned high impedance
>>> system.  Find it interesting as mag tape is mostly barium ferrite
>>> particles.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential?  Well, here is
>>>> what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on the
>>>> spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background from free
>>>> protons.  Please review Irving Langmuir
>>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir>  Atomic
>>>> Hydrogen.  Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is
>>>> created in a 30 atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In the
>>>> Lanfmuir torch a high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond creating
>>>> monatomic hydrogen (atoms).  Same with the Felici Generator, the
>>>> operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. According to Hal Puthoff, if a
>>>> hydrogen atom looses an electron it is immediately replenished by
>>>> the Zero Point space background.   The Felici Generator is a zero
>>>> Point Energy Generator or PUMP.  I had an interesting discussion
>>>> with Ken (RIP) Shoulders at a New Energy Symposium in Denver. I
>>>> asked him what type of power supply he used in charging his HVDC
>>>> capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster experiments. His reply was
>>>> an Electrostatic Influence Machine (Holtz Machine).  He  said that
>>>> if you apply a potential of lets say 100,000 Volts across a
>>>> capacitor it will charge because you have stressed the dielectric
>>>> (dielectric displacement).   Interesting answer to say the least. 
>>>> The charged capacitors will do work.  Same with the Felici
>>>> Generator for the 3,000 watt output will do work  drawing the
>>>> energy from the space background.   See!  Mick, I had to answer my
>>>> own question for nobody thinks about the perplexing problems.  Ha!
>>>> Ha!     Norm
>>>>
>>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003
>>>>
>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
>>>>
>>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron /
>>>>>> atom, where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV
>>>>>> Electrostatic Generator??  I have issued this challenge before
>>>>>> with no comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood.   What is Heat?   
>>>>>>> Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes
>>>>>>> due to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons
>>>>>>> until all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW,
>>>>>>> absolute zero conditions, there is no Browning Motion for there
>>>>>>> are no holes for electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy
>>>>>>> not just from the additional in the coil collapse but from the
>>>>>>> neutral spike Norm is on to.  It is elusive because it requires
>>>>>>> a solid negative pulse for that huge power return strike just
>>>>>>> like lighting.  With positive lightening there is no return
>>>>>>> strike.  The return mucks up everything silicon so no wonder it
>>>>>>> has been completely engineered around.  It's difficult to get
>>>>>>> solid negative with high voltage as the oscillations provide as
>>>>>>> you know the counter field so the proper neg polarity to input
>>>>>>> of a coil doesn't cut it but is a good start.  This is why Tesla
>>>>>>> was using magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling wave
>>>>>>> which is what he referred to as radiant.  I am sure certain
>>>>>>> materials also contribute to a more pure charge one way or the
>>>>>>> other just like with static charges.  We just have to learn to
>>>>>>> use the proper materials in our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will
>>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) creating
>>>>>>> the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative thunderstorm.
>>>>>>> Moray is interested in the positive lighting producing the
>>>>>>> sprite events over the storms as photographed by the ISIS Space
>>>>>>> Station. (interaction of the Hot positive charge with the Cold
>>>>>>> Negative ionosphere.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   By
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                      What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.  The reason for this
>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.  My
>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.  Would you believe that most
>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>> junction.  Historically we find that  German physicist,
>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.  Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.  It was not
>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>> reversed.  These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>> differentials.  In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.  In
>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.  The first
>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.   With a
>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.  Increasing
>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>> and voltage.  About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.   My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.  This is a directly
>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.  We have
>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.  Would
>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.   Back in 1840
>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.   After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.  The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>> transitions between phases.  More energy is present after
>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>> explained.  When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.  Now my suspicions
>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>> question of,  What is heat?    We were told in the  school
>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>> of energy.  What is the form of this energy?  Let us look at
>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>> process.  When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.  The
>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.  Now
>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.  Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.  When we apply a flame
>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>> (ions).  Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>> how the process works.  All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.  Everything  in chemistry is
>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>> cooling effects.  Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.  This is a
>>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>> current involved.   It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.  Remember
>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.   I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>> of experimentation.   Norm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super
>>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of
>>>>>>> using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super
>>>>>>> conductive Tesla Coil primary.   Tesla understood the power of a
>>>>>>> "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very high order!  
>>>>>>> "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Hi Mick,

"Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings"

The Poulsen arc was the kind of arc transmitters used until the invention of tubes. Here is Valdemar Poulsen's  patent (US789449) which use a flame and magnetism to control the arc: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP#

Wikipedia article: https://wiki2.org/en/Arc_converter https://wiki2.org/en/Arc_converter
From the Wikipedia article:
 Duddell arc (and other early types) In the first type of arc oscillator, the AC current in the condenser i0 is much smaller than the DC supply current i1, and the arc is never extinguished during an output cycle. The Duddell arc is an example of the first type, but the first type is not practical for RF transmitters.
 
 Poulsen arc In the second type of arc oscillator, the condenser AC discharge current is large enough to extinguish the arc but not large enough to restart the arc in the opposite direction. This second type is the Poulsen arc. Quenched spark gap In the third type of arc oscillator, the arc extinguishes but may reignite when the condenser current reverses. The third case is a quenched spark gap and produces damped oscillations.
https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/history/spark-gap-transmitters/poulsen-arc-transmitter.php https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/history/spark-gap-transmitters/poulsen-arc-transmitter.php

http://ethw.org/Milestones:Poulsen-Arc_Radio_Transmitter,_1902 http://ethw.org/Milestones:Poulsen-Arc_Radio_Transmitter,_1902

The history of Tesla's spark gaps and arcs: https://waveguide.blog/teslas-spark-gaps-literature-review/ https://waveguide.blog/teslas-spark-gaps-literature-review/
After the spark gaps and arcs came the tube era. Tesla used tubes too according to the story from his nephew about the ride in Tesla's electric car.

Regards
Ole 

---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :

 Norm,
 Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless power device might give away the candy store...
 I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the brief description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages employed/required?   Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings.
 I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.

 ...

http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm

Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed).  When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder!

Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame.

See:  Super light!


*WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*

*By:Dr. John Mileweski***

*SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *

*Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**. 
There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and 
opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and 
left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not 
light? *

*Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all things 
except light. They are wrong. **  There is parity in light as well ! *

*I will now explain and give you more detail. *

*SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by 
science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of 
years. It has been given different names by different cultures for 
thousands of years. *

*A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy, 
Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum 
Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception 
know it is real. *

*SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when James 
Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> solved his 
famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was invented by 
Nikola Tesla <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and 
theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain 
radio waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this 
explains radio waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation 
such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation 
also explains 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the 
solution that comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second 
solution"**was ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught 
algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root 
of –1) because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have 
changed and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's 
equation and it is SuperLight. *

*In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford University 
took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What does this 
second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *

*To understand this second solution, we must first review what the first 
or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: Radio 
waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point source 
(the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward infinity 
traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a large 
electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees to the 
electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. *

*The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite 
structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point 
source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation is 
composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical component, 
thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the equations are looked 
at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight" travels at the speed of 
light squared !**  10^20 meters per second,   or 10 billion times faster 
than light <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *

*It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding, 
shorter wavelength.   It therefore has a higher energy density. *

*The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come 
we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?" Well, 
the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8 
nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes 
through everything as though the substance was nearly completely 
transparent (like glass). *

*We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like x–rays, 
but even more so. More information, regarding the relative size, will be 
given later. *

*WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***

*It comes out of black holes !***

*First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the 
analogy for SuperLight. *

*Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric 
monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an 
electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or 
absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is 
converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the 
opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. *

*So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an 
electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its energy 
in the form of light. *

*Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot 
matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain 
magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small, 
extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering their 
orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. So black 
holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of SuperLight. Of 
course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces of the black 
holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity of light and it 
therefore, can easily escape._{7} *

*The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy 
in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of 
galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are 
literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an 
"Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *

*SUPERLIGHT and LIFE***

*I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating energy in the 
universe and accounts for the production of what we call life. I believe 
SuperLight interacts with special forms of matter in our bodies and 
produces what we call Vital Life Forces. These special forms of matter 
are found in bones, micro–crystals and also in the various fluids in the 
body, that contain cell salts. There are also, believed to be organic 
molecules in some body fluids, that are believed to be liquid 
crystalline in structure. These change state (liquid to crystal) very 
readily, with a extremely small change in energy (e.g. emotions). *

*Another form of organized structure found in the body, are the 
multitude of long parallel conductive protein structures, that form 
phase arrays like structures_{5} . Like the phased array radio telescope 
in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up extreme weak signals and amplify 
them, by being in phase. It is also suggested, that these proteins may 
have room temperature superconductivity. It is these organized 
structures in living things, that produce a coherence that has resonance 
with very minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of it passes through 
matter, between the nucleus and electron, without even coming in contact 
with them. *

*Our body is electronic in nature_{2-5} and it is composed of millions 
and billions of micro–electronic units that are formed in structures 
that have a phase array organization_{3} . I believe that the electronic 
resonance in these organized conductive molecules, have some resonance 
with very small amounts of SuperLight and that these energy fields and 
currents are responsible for the human aura and the energy vortexes 
found in the body chakra area. They also produce the Vital Life Forces. 
But, since SuperLight is so powerful, even a very, very small amount 
produces more than enough energy to sustain life. Thus, life is produced 
and sustained by specific forms and amounts of organized matter, and old 
age and eventual death occurs when too much disorder and disease comes 
into our bodies and breaks up this ordered structure. At that point, the 
body can no longer produce enough Vital Life Force from SuperLight to 
sustain itself. I also believe that all forms of organized matter 
produce its own aura–finger–prints or energy signature when it reacts 
with SuperLight. *

*There are many sensitive people, who can detect and read the aura of 
living entities and substances. Our body can determine whether this 
energy is good or bad for itself. I believe that this accounts for 
Kineseology and also explains how herbs work on the body. For example, 
each herb has an energy field signature that has a special attunement to 
specific body parts and its presence helps "kick off" or reactivate that 
energy center which may be slow or stopped, because of some illness or 
disease. Therefore, SuperLight to the rescue, through the herb structure 
that is appropriate to that area of the body in need. *

*Crystals**to the rescue also. Crystals are very organized structures 
and thus according to this thesis are also converters or transducers of 
SuperLight. This is where their energy comes from and explains how they 
seemingly can radiate a positive signal continuously without being 
recharged. As with herbs, crystals and minerals of different chemistries 
and structures, develop different types of energy fields. This explains 
why different crystals have different effects on different parts of the 
body. The key to crystal healing is to match the required energy with 
the proper crystal that produces that specific energy need. *

*As scientists and experimenters become more aware of SuperLight and 
start to understand it, experiments and instruments will be designed to 
attune to these energies. In the future, I conceive of manufacturing 
simulated body structures_{4} which will be micro–size phase array 
assemblies made of room temperature superconductors. They will be 
converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for healing. Specific 
micro–structures will be designed to attune to, and resonate with, the 
exact energy needed, in the specific part of the body that needs an 
energy boost for healing and regeneration. *

*It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for thousands of years, 
and that their secret was that they, at times, would sleep in crystal 
lined caves and that this would rejuvenate their bodies, bringing 
healing and new growth. *

*I propose that, in the very near future, I will be able to test this 
idea with the fiber crystal that I am making in my lab in Albuquerque. 
Soon, I hope to be able to grow my fiber crystals long enough, and in 
large enough quantities, that we will be able to spin these crystals 
into yarn. Once spun into yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be 
woven to make crystal cloth head and wristbands, hats, and meditation 
shawls. You could even stuff your mattress with crystal fiber, or cover 
your bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth wallpaper. This should 
stimulate creativity, imagination, healing and regeneration. *

*Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I believe that it will be 
possible to make room temperature superconductors of crystal fiber. If 
this becomes possible, we are talking about levitation, and possibly 
even a magic carpet. *

*So, the door is wide open with the possibilities of working with 
SuperLight energies, through the use of single crystal fibers. I believe 
these need to be high purity crystal fibers, in order to have the 
coherence necessary to resonate with SuperLight. *

*SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY*

*Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter 
<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, neither is inertia 
<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. These secondary forces 
are both formed by the reaction of matter to the dynamic field of 
SuperLight. Gravity is not an attraction! It is the result of a 
universal pressure, exerted by **SuperLight as it rains in from 
infinity, from all directions, onto every object**.   Materials are not 
100% transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, perhaps about 99.99999999% 
transparent. As a consequence, all material domains, all "matter", 
experiences an acceleration caused by SuperLight. Every "particle" is 
affected by a slight drag, or pressure differential, as SuperLight 
travels past and through them. *

*Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as SuperLight joins in, 
or exits the activities of the particle domain. Field effects come into 
play, as the SuperLight Entity travels through the Atomic Atmosphere 
producing drag. Drag turbulence and particle pressures combine to 
produce the accelerational force we know as gravity. *

*This acceleration is of little consequence when a single object is in 
space, at a very great distance from other objects, since the force 
vectors cancel out. However, when a second object comes close to the 
first object, then, the two objects shield each other from the full 
power of SuperLight pressure on the opposite sides of the objects facing 
each other. As a result of this, the objects experience a net 
accelerational force toward each other, which is directly proportional 
to their mass. Mass that produces the mutual shielding that each object 
experiences. Thus, falsely, each object is said to be attracted to each 
other !   In reality, they are being pushed together by the net 
differential force of SuperLight pressure which results from the slight 
absorption of SuperLight as it passes through these objects. This, 
according to my theory, is what creates gravity. It is a push exerted by 
SuperLight, on objects shielding each other, from a portion of the 
SuperLight radiation. *

*Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the effects of porous 
matter. An atom of matter is about 10^18 parts void for each part of 
solid matter. The wavelength of SuperLight is much smaller than the 
typical atomic dimension. Thus, most of SuperLight passes through the 
atomic structure unopposed. However, when SuperLight contacts the 
nucleus or electrons it produces the force that holds the electrons in 
orbit, and the nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This gives 
matter its chemical properties. Thus, gravity is the weak force since 
only a very small amount of SuperLight interacts with matter on the 
atomic scale. An example that will give you some idea as to how porous 
solid matter is, as follows: Let us expand the nucleus of an atom to the 
size of a golf ball, then the electrons in orbit about this nucleus 
would be about the size of a pea. Now when this pea makes its orbit 
about the golf ball its orbit is not a few feet or even a few yards in 
diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. Matter is mostly 
composed of void or space and the energy rays of SuperLight, whose 
wavelength is many times smaller than the diameter of the electron, will 
to a large extent miss the particle regions, as it rains through the 
atomic region. Only a small amount of SuperLight interacts with the 
nucleus and electrons while the majority will pass right through the 
region. *

*NUCLEAR FORCE***

*The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, when compared to that 
of the atom as a whole. The particles of matter in the nucleus are much 
closer to each other, than those in the electron. The nucleus is 
probably in the order of 10^28 more dense. Thus, the force that holds 
the nucleus together, must be very strong. *

*In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight pushing and 
interacting, that holds the components of nucleus together. These 
stronger interactions on the nucleus, are a result of its increased 
relative density and ability to shield SuperLight. It is the density and 
geometry of matter that changes the forces we see. Thus, from One 
Source, comes the One Force, that divides and manifests itself in so 
many interesting ways. *

*The relative packing symmetry is very critical in the nucleus and this 
accounts for the relative stability of various nuclei. A less 
symmetrical structure, results in radioactivity and an unstable nucleus. 
In this way, SuperLight helps to explain radioactivity. *

*SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY***

*(The University Field or Energy Source) *

*Einstein spent the last half of his life in search of a unifying field 
theory that would unite all forces into one. I believe that with 
SuperLight, a theory can be developed to explain this idea. SuperLight; 
one force, once source. The concept I've developed is new, and all 
aspects have not yet been considered, but what has been covered appears 
to fit quite well with our current understanding of reality. *

*I propose that SuperLight energy is the singularity or universal energy 
force in all nature and that its interaction with various forms of 
matter and energy produce all other forces in the Universe. Specific 
atomic structures and sub-atomic structures are resonant to and interact 
with some aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them and our 
bodies. The energy that is absorbed is converted into the electrical, 
magnetic, nuclear and gravitational forces producing our vital life 
force. This can explain all the forces of nature and life energies. *

*It is the geometry and density of matter that explains the different 
forms and intensity of the forces that are produced. *

*FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE***

*As greater understanding of what types of devices 
<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td.htm> can attune to SuperLight, 
I believe that it will be possible to capture this energy, collect it, 
and measure it. At first only small assemblies will be made for healing 
and regeneration, (only small amounts are needed) scientific analysis, 
proof of principle and localized experiments. In the future, I envision 
massive devices to be used as direct energy converters. This development 
will have a significant effect on reducing world pollution associated 
with most other energy producing systems such as nuclear and fossil fuels. *

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*SUMMARY***

*There is parity in the universe, therefore light has two forms: *

*ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C.   (10^10 meters per 
sec.) *

*MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C squared. *

*These lights are responsible for all created matter, all forces, and 
life itself. As a result of this theory , I make the following statements; *

*LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY***

*1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight reacting with 
coherent structures in the body. *

*2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from the interaction with 
SuperLight. *

*3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body. *

*4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by exposure to higher 
concentrations of SuperLight. *

*5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the SuperLight wave bands. *

*Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy***

*1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether that reacts with all 
matter and energy causing all forces. *

*2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of matter, but only a reaction 
to an external force. (e.g. SuperLight) *

*3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, but only it's 
reaction to acceleration through the ether of SuperLight's dynamic field. *

*4. It eliminates the problem of action at a distance. *

*5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and solves Dr. Rubins 
problem of the outer stars in galaxies "traveling too fast". (There is a 
slight drag causing the stars to fall slowly into the center of the 
galaxy.) *

*6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but becomes less as one 
approaches black holes, due to the reduction effect of SuperLight 
radiating out of the black hole. *

*7. This also means that the gravity constant becomes significantly less 
at the edge of the Universe. *

*8. It also allows black holes to reach an equilibrium state, — matter 
in SuperLight out — thus preventing one black hole from becoming massive 
and gobbling up the whole universe. *

*9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are SuperLight. *

*10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang and creation 
<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. For example: Since 
gravity and inertia are the result of matter reacting with SuperLight, 
which did not exist prior to the big bang, or in early times, then, the 
Big Bang could have been a Little Bang (or a big breath)because any 
force would cause and infinite acceleration, since there was nothing to 
hold matter back. *

*SuperLight And Space Travel***

*Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will permit extreme 
distant communication in space in much shorter times. (e.g. 100,000 
light years in 3 to 4 minutes.) *

*It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you travel in space, thus 
permitting real deep space travel. *

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**

*Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An
Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy ***



Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting,  You have to have a very 
high volume capacity HVDC (negative)  ion generator like the Felici 
3,000 watt electrostatic generator.  When I was working with Leonard 
Dorsett and his Super Steam Generator that put out CO2, Nitrogen and 
water vapor, planned to incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion genweration 
to enhance its proven fire fighting capability!  (Super Steam 
Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference 1995) see YouTube.


On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the 
> Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all 
> slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite 
> communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems that 
> maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely 
> applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this 
> purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless 
> power device might give away the candy store...
>
> I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control.  
> Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter.  Do you 
> think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what 
> is required to build a prototype?  From the brief description 
> available it appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg 
> ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires 
> you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks 
> sufficient or are more relativistic voltages employed/required?   
> Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but 
> the description and drawing are available in The inventions, 
> researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  
> There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short 
> spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed 
> devices that the occasional mutterings.
>
> I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this 
> effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to 
> get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.
>
>
> On 7/23/2018 12:48 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>> Date: 	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:08:28 -0500
>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>> To: 	Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Bert Pool 
>> <[email protected]>
>> CC: 	Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain 
>> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Lane 
>> Wootan <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Phil 
>> Rembold <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>> Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and 
>> became friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics 
>> (Southland Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets of 
>> all size and shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing, 
>> molding, firing and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite magnets. 
>> EPA mandated the end of the use of barium in the manufacturing 
>> process with a strontium substitute. The barium magnets became 
>> available from Brazil and China. Back when I visited with Don Martin 
>> and got the dimensions of Sparky's magnets  I found them at Edmund 
>> Scientific so bought the exact same Sweet magnets. I was scrapping 
>> sown all the main frame  (IBM) computers in the DFW area and  found 
>> that the early versions of the big hard drives had the barium magnets 
>> which Joel and I used in the MRA (Mini Sweet).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear servos in 
>> the read write heads.
>>
>> After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold electrical 
>> output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) I realized that 
>> much more had to be learned about this aspect of research. I know you 
>> were involved to some extent.
>>
>> See: Sweet attachments in his own words!
>>
>> Before I got all bogged down with  my Hydrogen Production Process and 
>> building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had 
>> formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to be 
>> made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype magnets built.
>> Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I 
>> accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet Project. 
>> I guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still yet to be 
>> realized!  Lol
>> Norm
>>
>>
>> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Lots of stuff here.  I have been busy so need to back and review all.
>>>
>>> I did see a reference to barium ferrite.  Sparky sweet said the 
>>> magnets he used had to be barium ferrite.  Most ceramic magnets of 
>>> the size he was using are strontium ferrite.  To tell the difference 
>>> I used, per his instructions, an ohm meter.  One conducts, the other 
>>> doesn’t.  I forget which way it is.  Somewhere in my collection of 
>>> boxes I think I have one of his magnets.  I’m still unpackingand 
>>> organizing  after many, many moves so it will be awhile before I 
>>> find it.
>>>
>>> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Toby
>>>
>>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>>> Date: 	Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700
>>>> From: 	[email protected][EVGRAY]<[email protected]>
>>>> Reply-To: 	[email protected]
>>>> To: 	[email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Interesting theory Norm,
>>>>
>>>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most other 
>>>> people, I read your patent.
>>>>
>>>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference is 
>>>> but there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or at 
>>>> least a neutron missing.  Very interesting what happens with a 
>>>> Coleman battery in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems 
>>>> to know what a hole is, some say it's protons but I think proton 
>>>> electricity is a different animal.
>>>>
>>>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so maybe 
>>>> the mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it has no 
>>>> neutron and would only need a proton to gather an electron.  If it 
>>>> shows up from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning.
>>>>
>>>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so we do 
>>>> agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain forming in a 
>>>> similar way. When we have these weather systems starting on the 
>>>> west cost and dumping billions of gallons all across the country 
>>>> more than the clouds could ever hold.  As the high and lower clouds 
>>>> commingle I thing they convert nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly 
>>>> without a ground connection so they are in fact pumps.
>>>>
>>>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and then 
>>>> fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge from a 
>>>> serious influence machine for the neutral spike.
>>>>
>>>> The Felici device sounds like something to build someday.  Also 
>>>> interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the 
>>>> Protium state.
>>>>
>>>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea too.  I 
>>>> think there are some deep truths in William Lynes writings even if 
>>>> some of the whys and wherefores may be misinterpreted.
>>>>
>>>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to 
>>>> pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic alignments 
>>>> and restructuring.   I think Barrium Ferrite might be 
>>>> piezoelectric, don't recall right now, but either way it seems to 
>>>> be a very good insulator and something that can fraction electrons 
>>>> from the B field.  I imagine you played with this stuff quite a bit 
>>>> during your MRA design and likely noticed some interesting aspects 
>>>> of the material.
>>>>
>>>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape heads 
>>>> for a OU lenz free generator.   He had a single sine wave freq and 
>>>> claimed he could loop generating electricity in this way as the 
>>>> tape passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts did not 
>>>> seem to get loaded down. Probably just another tuned high impedance 
>>>> system.  Find it interesting as mag tape is mostly barium ferrite 
>>>> particles.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential?  Well, here is 
>>>>> what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on the 
>>>>> spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background from free 
>>>>> protons.  Please reviewIrving Langmuir 
>>>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir>  Atomic 
>>>>> Hydrogen.  Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is 
>>>>> created in a 30 atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In the 
>>>>> Lanfmuir torch a high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond creating 
>>>>> monatomic hydrogen (atoms).  Same with the Felici Generator, the 
>>>>> operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. According to Hal Puthoff, if a 
>>>>> hydrogen atom looses an electron it is immediately replenished by 
>>>>> the Zero Point space background.   The Felici Generator is a zero 
>>>>> Point Energy Generator or PUMP.  I had an interesting discussion 
>>>>> with Ken (RIP) Shoulders at a New Energy Symposium in Denver. I 
>>>>> asked him what type of power supply he used in charging his HVDC 
>>>>> capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster experiments. His reply was 
>>>>> an Electrostatic Influence Machine (Holtz Machine). He  said that 
>>>>> if you apply a potential of lets say 100,000 Volts across a 
>>>>> capacitor it will charge because you have stressed the dielectric 
>>>>> (dielectric displacement).   Interesting answer to say the least. 
>>>>> The charged capacitors will do work.  Same with the Felici 
>>>>> Generator for the 3,000 watt output will do work  drawing the 
>>>>> energy from the space background. See!  Mick, I had to answer my 
>>>>> own question for nobody thinks about the perplexing problems.  Ha! 
>>>>> Ha!     Norm
>>>>>
>>>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / 
>>>>>>> atom, where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV 
>>>>>>> Electrostatic Generator??  I have issued this challenge before 
>>>>>>> with no comments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood. What is Heat? 
>>>>>>>> Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes 
>>>>>>>> due to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons 
>>>>>>>> until all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW, 
>>>>>>>> absolute zero conditions, there is no Browning Motion for there 
>>>>>>>> are no holes for electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra 
>>>>>>>> energy not just from the additional in the coil collapse but 
>>>>>>>> from the neutral spike Norm is on to.  It is elusive because it 
>>>>>>>> requires a solid negative pulse for that huge power return 
>>>>>>>> strike just like lighting.  With positive lightening there is 
>>>>>>>> no return strike.  The return mucks up everything silicon so no 
>>>>>>>> wonder it has been completely engineered around.  It's 
>>>>>>>> difficult to get solid negative with high voltage as the 
>>>>>>>> oscillations provide as you know the counter field so the 
>>>>>>>> proper neg polarity to input of a coil doesn't cut it but is a 
>>>>>>>> good start.  This is why Tesla was using magnetic to fraction 
>>>>>>>> out the negative traveling wave which is what he referred to as 
>>>>>>>> radiant.  I am sure certain materials also contribute to a more 
>>>>>>>> pure charge one way or the other just like with static 
>>>>>>>> charges.  We just have to learn to use the proper materials in 
>>>>>>>> our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/ 
>>>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will 
>>>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) creating 
>>>>>>>> the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative thunderstorm. 
>>>>>>>> Moray is interested in the positive lighting producing the 
>>>>>>>> sprite events over the storms as photographed by the ISIS Space 
>>>>>>>> Station. (interaction of the Hot positive charge with the Cold 
>>>>>>>> Negative ionosphere.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   By
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist,
>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool
>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is
>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super 
>>>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of 
>>>>>>>> using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super 
>>>>>>>> conductive Tesla Coil primary. Tesla understood the power of a 
>>>>>>>> "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very high order! "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

*A S T R O  S A*

*INCORPORATED*


/Adelaide Branch
/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to the May newsletter. This month I thought I would get away 
from the electronic type devices and feature a rather overlooked form of 
energy which has some interesting characteristics, this being STEAM!! It 
would appear that steam is not dead, but like a lot of other things the 
processes of production and use just need to be looked at in a different 
way. Maybe this will give you some ideas to try for yourself.

*_APRIL MEETING_*

This months meeting began at 8.1OPM with 23 people present with no 
apologies this month. Ashley began proceedings by welcoming newcomers 
James and his son Matteo, and also Dudley from the Byron Bay group who 
delayed his return to NSW so he could attend the meeting. Kevin reported 
that we are still in the black and now have enough money to subscribe to 
the Extraordinary Science magazine. I then read out the correspondence 
received during the last month. This included a letter and video tape 
from Lee in Sydney, a Searl Group newsletter, a Dennis Lee newsletter, 
information from TEAP in WA, a letter from the Byron Bay ASTRO group 
telling us that their submission for a government grant has been lodged, 
and some H2 news from Ian in VIC.

Ashley continued the meeting by presenting Tony with an article on how 
to have an intimate relationship over the Intemet, and if that doesn't 
work he can look at the pictures in the rest of the magazine. Ashley 
also presented the group with some more videos (details later), brought 
up the subject of leaded verses unleaded petrol as seen in an article in 
NEXUS magazine and mentioned an item which appeared on the local 
community TV station, ACE TV, on a new injection system for the Split 
Cycle engine.

Tony then gave us the first talk for the night which was on the MRA 
device and included an explanation of a miniature-version which has now 
surfaced using common over-the-counter type parts. Roger then gave a 
demonstration of the TOMI device which he constructed from the 
information shown in last months newsletter, and guess what???  IT 
WORKED!!!! This demonstration was backed up by Tony showing a computer 
simulation of a modified version of the TOMI device. Andrew followed 
with a talk on Steam Injection in motor vehicles and specifically on the 
system that he is presently constructing. Andrew also spoke on the John 
Whittman-Ray process of Body Electronics and the amazing results that 
have been achieved with this process. Both of Andrews talks were well 
presented and well received by those at the meeting.

The meeting was then put back to general discussion amidst a false start 
in the race to the biscuits. Dudley spoke briefly on his involvement 
with a Democratic School in Byron Bay and also on his other project of 
setting up the Sustainable Settlement Research Institute. Peter then 
produced a flyer that he found on books dealing with sustainable 
building methods, etc. while Allan spoke about some Dan Winter 
information and presented a report on Subliminal Tapes for people to 
read. Michael presented an alternative books catalogue that he found on 
the Internet and an article on a rather interesting modified Holden 
engine. Dino talked of an article that he saw/read/heard? about 
entraining light through fibre optic cable so that the light actually 
does the switching. Finally Cedric passed around some photographs of his 
Adams Motor tests that he has been doing, and quietly stated that he was 
getting overunity. Hopefully he can bring it along to the next meeting 
so we can all have a look. The meeting proper finished at 10.30PM with 
the usual sugar fix (no cream puffs this month) and the last people 
leaving around midnight.

*_SUPER STEAM TECHNOLOGY PART 1_*

Peter recently gave me a copy of "TheAquarian Newsletter" produced by an 
English company called Aquarian Agency Ltd. This newsletter basically 
promotes all the technology that they are trying to sell with their main 
product being Aquastone. which is a "non shrinking, highly insulating, 
fire resistant, fast setting (even underwater) material made from gypsum 
waste". The interesting side of their products include Victor 
Schauberger vortex research, a salt removing liquid called Rodak, aimed 
at the agricultural market and a water purification system called Care 
Free which works by using harmonic movements. Finally they are also into 
steam, in fact they are working on "super steam" similar to Leonard 
Dorsetts work (see next article) as shown by the following quote from 
their newsletter.

"*SUPER STEAM* - A Tesla conference in Colorado surfaces new Super Steam 
Technology (SST). Leonard Dorsett and friends from Texas share 
strikingly similar views to Aquarian Agency Ltd. They have technology 
which produces steam instantly at up to 3,000F without a boiler and with 
60% savings in fuel over traditional boilers. Nitrogen rich, it can put 
out gasoline fires and treat many waste problems. Of major importance to 
Aquarian, this nitrogen-rich steam will help to produce heat and 
Aquastone at considerable savings."

For further information on Aquarian Agency Ltd. they can be contacted at 
38 Weir Rd, Wimbledon, London SW19 SUG, England or on Internet at 
<aquarian ocign.ape.org>.

*_SUPER STEAM TECHNOLOGY PART 2_*

Leonard Dorsett (PO Box 365, Grapevine, TX 76092) demonstrated his Super 
Steam Technology at the 1994 International Tesla Symposium. SST is a 
system for producing steam at any temperature or pressure independently 
and instantly without the need for a conventional boiler. It can 
instantly produce steam of any temperature from hot water at 180F to 
super heated steam at over 3000F, while pressures can vary from 1PSI to 
3000PSI with airflow volumes of 1CFM up to over 2000CFM. The system 
operates on propane, methane, petrol, kerosene, methanol, diesel, 
hydrogen or just about anything else that bums and converts virtually 
100% of the fuel into usable energy. (Note: The person in the picture is 
Norman Wootan of MRA fame)

This all sounds great, but how does it work? The basis of the unit is a 
specially designed open throat chamber with controlled air, water and 
fuel interaction and a high voltage ignition resulting in a direct fire 
process establishing thermal zones. This creates a stoichiometric 
condition resulting in a full spectrum of steam product. Now comes the 
interesting part At the increased temperatures of steam, disassociation 
occurs. (Could this be a clue to running cars on water??) The hydrogen 
and oxygen reacts causing an exponential increase of energy resulting in 
super heated steam. A similar superheat process was addressed by Tesla 
in the October 12, 1911 publication of the "Engineering News Record".

Applications of the SST system include a much more economical way of 
producing electricity as no conventional boiler is needed. It will also 
be an ideal low cost method for heating and cooling homes and 
businesses. Small portable units can be developed for home use, such as 
steam cleaning, and insect and ant removal, without the dangers of 
insecticides. The system can also be used for low cost purification of 
polluted water or sewerage and can also convert salt water into drinking 
water both quickly and inexpensively. Other uses are in fire fighting 
applications, ice and snow removal from roads, etc. and sterilization 
and nurturing of soil for agriculture where contamination has occurred.

*_ERRATA: or I STUFFED UP!_*

Last months article on the TOMI device brought a response from Steve of 
the WA Searl group in that the reference to the SEG doesn't mean Space 
Energy Generator, but does mean Searl Effect Generator. The article came 
straight off Internet but nevertheless I did not pick up the mistake. 
This is the second time I have been sprung by Steve, the first being 
when I spelt Searl with an "e" on the end. Thanks for the feedback Steve.

*_THERMODYNAMICS OF STEAM_*

The following is an excerpt from a book by Floyd Clymer called 
"Historical Motor Scrapbook - Steam Car Edition Vol. I" kindly loaned to 
me by Peter. Although the explanation is designed for conventional steam 
engines, the article shows the tremendous amount of energy stored when 
PHASE CHANGE occurs from liquid to gas. This then raises the question 
that if steam can be produced "free" by using exhaust heat from a petrol 
engine, can this energy stored in the steam be used to generate extra 
motive power in the same engine?

"Latent Heat: If water be heated in an open vessel it will reach a 
temperature of approximately 212F (100C) and will then boil away without 
further rise in temperature. The added heat is absorbed in converting 
the water into steam.

It takes far more heat to convert water into steam than to raise its 
temperature. A pound of water heated to boiling from 32F absorbs only 
18013TU, but in boiling away at 212F it absorbs an 996BTU additional. At 
atmospheric pressure the volume of steam is 1645 times the volume of 
water whence it came. This bulk of steam must displace an equal bulk of 
air, and part of the heat energy represented by the steam has been spent 
in pushing back the air to give it room. This will be made clearer from 
the sketch, showing a long tube open at the top and containing a little 
water in the bottom. On top of the water is a piston, supposed to be 
air-tight and without weight or friction. If the water be boiled into 
steam, the piston will be pushed upward against the atmospheric pressure 
a distance equal to 1645 times the original depth of the water. The work 
in foot-pounds thus done will be 14.7 times the area of the piston in 
square inches times the distance in feet through which it has moved. 
Approximately 7.45 percent of the heat imparted to the steam represents 
work done against the atmosphere; the remainder is spent overcoming the 
mutual attraction of the molecules of water. The heat which has been 
absorbed by the change of state from water to steam without change in 
temperature is called the latent heat of vaporisation."

*_ASTRO VIDEO LIBRARY_*

There has been a few new additions to our library this month thanks to 
Lee from Sydney (1994 International Tesla Symposium videos) and our very 
own Ashley (Borderland Science Research Foundation videos). These will 
all be available to borrow at the next meeting.

Daurn                                                 Tesla's Egg & the 
Philadelphia Experiment
Seifer                                                  Tesla: The Lost 
Years
Zeigler                                                 A Pre-Tesla Coil
Tesla Memorial Society                       Nikola Tesla: The Genius 
who lit the World
Jorge Resines - BSRF                          Invisible Radiations & the 
many Grid Theory
Gerry Vassilatos - BSRF                      Ray of Discovery 111 - 
Medical Radionics
Gerry Vasilatos - BSRF                        Ray of DiscoveryI - Nikola 
Tesla

*_FUEL/WATER VAPOUR SYSTEM WITH A DIFFERENCE_*

In another variation of fuel/water vapour injection is this idea which 
has apparently been tried with success by Mr Anonymous (and achieved 
8OMPG). I have no personal knowledge of this system but it seems like an 
interesting combination of technologies which may just work. The general 
principle is to recirculate part of the exhaust gas back in through the 
carburettor. This has the effect of vaporising the fuel (and water if 
used) mixture using the heat from the exhaust gasses. This system is 
suited to a cross flow style of engine as the carburettor needs to be 
mounted at a distance from the inlet manifold to allow a smoother flow 
of gasses into the engine. The longer inlet pipe also allows time for 
the mixture to vaporise, (see diagram 1) and apparently can produce a 
turbo charging effect if the diameter and length of the pipe are 
calculated correctly.


As the exhaust comes out of the engine , it passes through an exhaust 
splitter which allows some gas to exit from the normal exhaust pipe, 
while the rest is recirculated back into the inlet manifold. If water 
injection is to be added, it can be sprayed into the system at this 
point. The basic division of gas is set by an adjustable deflector 
inside the splitter (see diagram 2) while the amount required by the 
engine at any given time is adjusted by a butterfly valve in the tube. 
This valve is inter-connected with another one on the carburettor and 
one at the inlet manifold to maintain the correct air/fuel ratio. The 
butterfly at the exhaust splitter is temperature controlled so that it 
cannot operate until the engine is warm.

*_STEAM INJECTION_*

Thankyou to Andrew for this article on steam injection which was the 
subject of his interesting talk at the last ASTRO meeting.

"Water Vapour (water injection) is well known to increase the octane 
rating of petrol. (reduce knock or pinging) It also unfortunately 
reduces efficiency by robbing the fuel of a lot of its energy as it 
absorbs the Latent Heat of Vaporisation (refer to phase change 
technology). If however, the vaporisation of the water into steam is 
done outside of the combustion chamber, several interesting things happen.

The waste heat from the exhaust can be "harvested" and returned to the 
combustion process, producing steam at 300 to 400 degrees Celcius. This 
steam is introduced to the inlet manifold and instantly vaporises the 
fuel. This reduces the temperature of the mixture to approximately 150 
degrees Celcius due to the phase change of the fuel. The resulting fuel 
vapour, steam and air mixture is more easily ignited than the fuel 
"droplets" and air mixture that occurs in an ordinary engine, thus 
enabling the correct fuel/air mixture to be maintained, but using 
significantly less fuel to do so. This is due to the fact that in a 
conventional engine, it is only the vapour that surrounds the fuel 
"droplets" that contributes to the fuel/air mixture, with the droplets 
only burning and creating heat in the process. The important thing is 
that all of the "heat" of combustion goes into expanding the mixture, 
while none is lost in vaporising the fuel, etc.

Another advantage of this process is that it gives lower exhaust 
emissions as combustion occurs at a much lower temperature due to the 
steam. This causes reduced Nitrous Oxide emissions in the exhaust. When 
carbon fuels burn in the presence of steam, the carbon robs the Oxygen 
from the water (H20) to form Carbon Dioxide (C02), leaving Hydrogen (H2) 
to burn as a separate combustion. Thus the exhaust gasses tend to be C02 
+ H2 + H20, rather than CO + C02 + H20, with the only compound not 
mentioned before being CO which is Carbon Monoxide.

Steam has a far greater Coefficient of Expansion than hot air: i.e. a 
smaller quantity will "push" a piston much further. Due to the lower 
temperature of combustion (fuel/air is approx. 2500C, while 
steam/fuel/air is approx. 750C) and the smaller charge of fuel/air in 
each induction, the engine runs at a greatly reduced temperature. This 
means that less of the fuel's energy ends up being lost in the radiator, 
exhaust and in direct radiation from the engine. This all adds up to 
improvements in fuel economy, less emissions, less exhaust noise and 
longer engine life. I estimate that the basic set up can be built for 
$300 to $400, which is one third the price of an LPG conversion. Fuel 
consumption should be about 25%, which for a Holden makes it around 
100MPG!!! Andrew"

*_TWO MILES A MINUTE IN 19O6_*

The interesting thing about this bit of history is the method of 
producing the steam. Guess what, they burnt "gasoline" as a vapour!!!

*_ROD MULLER &"THE CROW"_*

Although not "alternative" as we define the word, because this edition 
of the newsletter is about steam, and Rod keeps on inventing new ways to 
utilise this medium, I thought I would include this article from The 
Advertiser newspaper.



*_A NEW PERSON IN OUR MIDST!_*

For those of you who don't know by now, Ian (who sometimes dowses his 
way to our meetings) and wife Frauke have a son, Lucas Gabriel, who was 
born on April 1st. Everyone is well and happy after a successful home birth.

*_NEXT MEETING_*

*_FRIDAY MAY 19TH_*


This month will feature the 30 minute video: *_NIKOLA TESLA:The Genius 
who lit the World_*

The usual applies in that please bring $3.00 to cover video purchase and 
newsletter printing/postage, and something for supper would be 
appreciated.I hope to see you all there !!!


On 7/26/2018 10:39 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm
>
> Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed).  When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder!
>
> Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame.
>
> See:  Super light!
>
>
> *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*
>
> *By:Dr. John Mileweski***
>
> *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *
>
> *Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**. 
> There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and 
> opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and 
> left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not 
> light? *
>
> *Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all 
> things except light. They are wrong. **  There is parity in light as 
> well ! *
>
> *I will now explain and give you more detail. *
>
> *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by 
> science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of 
> years. It has been given different names by different cultures for 
> thousands of years. *
>
> *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy, 
> Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum 
> Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception 
> know it is real. *
>
> *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when 
> James Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> 
> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was 
> invented by Nikola Tesla 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and theoretical 
> physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio waves. 
> When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio 
> waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation such as light, 
> radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains 
> 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that 
> comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second solution"**was 
> ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught algebra and 
> were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root of –1) 
> because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have changed 
> and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and 
> it is SuperLight. *
>
> *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford 
> University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What 
> does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *
>
> *To understand this second solution, we must first review what the 
> first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: 
> Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point 
> source (the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward 
> infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a 
> large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees 
> to the electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. *
>
> *The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite 
> structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point 
> source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation 
> is composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical 
> component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the 
> equations are looked at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight" 
> travels at the speed of light squared !**  10^20 meters per second,   
> or 10 billion times faster than light 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *
>
> *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding, 
> shorter wavelength.   It therefore has a higher energy density. *
>
> *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come 
> we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?"   
> Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8 
> nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes 
> through everything as though the substance was nearly completely 
> transparent (like glass). *
>
> *We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like 
> x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative 
> size, will be given later. *
>
> *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***
>
> *It comes out of black holes !***
>
> *First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the 
> analogy for SuperLight. *
>
> *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric 
> monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an 
> electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or 
> absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is 
> converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the 
> opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. *
>
> *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an 
> electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its 
> energy in the form of light. *
>
> *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot 
> matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain 
> magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small, 
> extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering 
> their orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. 
> So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of 
> SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces 
> of the black holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity 
> of light and it therefore, can easily escape._{7} *
>
> *The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy 
> in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of 
> galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are 
> literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an 
> "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT and LIFE***
>
> *I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating energy in the 
> universe and accounts for the production of what we call life. I 
> believe SuperLight interacts with special forms of matter in our 
> bodies and produces what we call Vital Life Forces. These special 
> forms of matter are found in bones, micro–crystals and also in the 
> various fluids in the body, that contain cell salts. There are also, 
> believed to be organic molecules in some body fluids, that are 
> believed to be liquid crystalline in structure. These change state 
> (liquid to crystal) very readily, with a extremely small change in 
> energy (e.g. emotions). *
>
> *Another form of organized structure found in the body, are the 
> multitude of long parallel conductive protein structures, that form 
> phase arrays like structures_{5} . Like the phased array radio 
> telescope in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up extreme weak signals 
> and amplify them, by being in phase. It is also suggested, that these 
> proteins may have room temperature superconductivity. It is these 
> organized structures in living things, that produce a coherence that 
> has resonance with very minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of it 
> passes through matter, between the nucleus and electron, without even 
> coming in contact with them. *
>
> *Our body is electronic in nature_{2-5} and it is composed of millions 
> and billions of micro–electronic units that are formed in structures 
> that have a phase array organization_{3} . I believe that the 
> electronic resonance in these organized conductive molecules, have 
> some resonance with very small amounts of SuperLight and that these 
> energy fields and currents are responsible for the human aura and the 
> energy vortexes found in the body chakra area. They also produce the 
> Vital Life Forces. But, since SuperLight is so powerful, even a very, 
> very small amount produces more than enough energy to sustain life. 
> Thus, life is produced and sustained by specific forms and amounts of 
> organized matter, and old age and eventual death occurs when too much 
> disorder and disease comes into our bodies and breaks up this ordered 
> structure. At that point, the body can no longer produce enough Vital 
> Life Force from SuperLight to sustain itself. I also believe that all 
> forms of organized matter produce its own aura–finger–prints or energy 
> signature when it reacts with SuperLight. *
>
> *There are many sensitive people, who can detect and read the aura of 
> living entities and substances. Our body can determine whether this 
> energy is good or bad for itself. I believe that this accounts for 
> Kineseology and also explains how herbs work on the body. For example, 
> each herb has an energy field signature that has a special attunement 
> to specific body parts and its presence helps "kick off" or reactivate 
> that energy center which may be slow or stopped, because of some 
> illness or disease. Therefore, SuperLight to the rescue, through the 
> herb structure that is appropriate to that area of the body in need. *
>
> *Crystals**to the rescue also. Crystals are very organized structures 
> and thus according to this thesis are also converters or transducers 
> of SuperLight. This is where their energy comes from and explains how 
> they seemingly can radiate a positive signal continuously without 
> being recharged. As with herbs, crystals and minerals of different 
> chemistries and structures, develop different types of energy fields. 
> This explains why different crystals have different effects on 
> different parts of the body. The key to crystal healing is to match 
> the required energy with the proper crystal that produces that 
> specific energy need. *
>
> *As scientists and experimenters become more aware of SuperLight and 
> start to understand it, experiments and instruments will be designed 
> to attune to these energies. In the future, I conceive of 
> manufacturing simulated body structures_{4} which will be micro–size 
> phase array assemblies made of room temperature superconductors. They 
> will be converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for healing. 
> Specific micro–structures will be designed to attune to, and resonate 
> with, the exact energy needed, in the specific part of the body that 
> needs an energy boost for healing and regeneration. *
>
> *It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for thousands of 
> years, and that their secret was that they, at times, would sleep in 
> crystal lined caves and that this would rejuvenate their bodies, 
> bringing healing and new growth. *
>
> *I propose that, in the very near future, I will be able to test this 
> idea with the fiber crystal that I am making in my lab in Albuquerque. 
> Soon, I hope to be able to grow my fiber crystals long enough, and in 
> large enough quantities, that we will be able to spin these crystals 
> into yarn. Once spun into yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be 
> woven to make crystal cloth head and wristbands, hats, and meditation 
> shawls. You could even stuff your mattress with crystal fiber, or 
> cover your bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth wallpaper. This 
> should stimulate creativity, imagination, healing and regeneration. *
>
> *Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I believe that it will be 
> possible to make room temperature superconductors of crystal fiber. If 
> this becomes possible, we are talking about levitation, and possibly 
> even a magic carpet. *
>
> *So, the door is wide open with the possibilities of working with 
> SuperLight energies, through the use of single crystal fibers. I 
> believe these need to be high purity crystal fibers, in order to have 
> the coherence necessary to resonate with SuperLight. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY*
>
> *Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, neither is inertia 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. These secondary 
> forces are both formed by the reaction of matter to the dynamic field 
> of SuperLight. Gravity is not an attraction! It is the result of a 
> universal pressure, exerted by **SuperLight as it rains in from 
> infinity, from all directions, onto every object**.   Materials are 
> not 100% transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, perhaps about 
> 99.99999999% transparent. As a consequence, all material domains, all 
> "matter", experiences an acceleration caused by SuperLight. Every 
> "particle" is affected by a slight drag, or pressure differential, as 
> SuperLight travels past and through them. *
>
> *Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as SuperLight joins in, 
> or exits the activities of the particle domain. Field effects come 
> into play, as the SuperLight Entity travels through the Atomic 
> Atmosphere producing drag. Drag turbulence and particle pressures 
> combine to produce the accelerational force we know as gravity. *
>
> *This acceleration is of little consequence when a single object is in 
> space, at a very great distance from other objects, since the force 
> vectors cancel out. However, when a second object comes close to the 
> first object, then, the two objects shield each other from the full 
> power of SuperLight pressure on the opposite sides of the objects 
> facing each other. As a result of this, the objects experience a net 
> accelerational force toward each other, which is directly proportional 
> to their mass. Mass that produces the mutual shielding that each 
> object experiences. Thus, falsely, each object is said to be attracted 
> to each other !   In reality, they are being pushed together by the 
> net differential force of SuperLight pressure which results from the 
> slight absorption of SuperLight as it passes through these objects. 
> This, according to my theory, is what creates gravity. It is a push 
> exerted by SuperLight, on objects shielding each other, from a portion 
> of the SuperLight radiation. *
>
> *Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the effects of porous 
> matter. An atom of matter is about 10^18 parts void for each part of 
> solid matter. The wavelength of SuperLight is much smaller than the 
> typical atomic dimension. Thus, most of SuperLight passes through the 
> atomic structure unopposed. However, when SuperLight contacts the 
> nucleus or electrons it produces the force that holds the electrons in 
> orbit, and the nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This gives 
> matter its chemical properties. Thus, gravity is the weak force since 
> only a very small amount of SuperLight interacts with matter on the 
> atomic scale. An example that will give you some idea as to how porous 
> solid matter is, as follows: Let us expand the nucleus of an atom to 
> the size of a golf ball, then the electrons in orbit about this 
> nucleus would be about the size of a pea. Now when this pea makes its 
> orbit about the golf ball its orbit is not a few feet or even a few 
> yards in diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. Matter is 
> mostly composed of void or space and the energy rays of SuperLight, 
> whose wavelength is many times smaller than the diameter of the 
> electron, will to a large extent miss the particle regions, as it 
> rains through the atomic region. Only a small amount of SuperLight 
> interacts with the nucleus and electrons while the majority will pass 
> right through the region. *
>
> *NUCLEAR FORCE***
>
> *The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, when compared to 
> that of the atom as a whole. The particles of matter in the nucleus 
> are much closer to each other, than those in the electron. The nucleus 
> is probably in the order of 10^28 more dense. Thus, the force that 
> holds the nucleus together, must be very strong. *
>
> *In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight pushing and 
> interacting, that holds the components of nucleus together. These 
> stronger interactions on the nucleus, are a result of its increased 
> relative density and ability to shield SuperLight. It is the density 
> and geometry of matter that changes the forces we see. Thus, from One 
> Source, comes the One Force, that divides and manifests itself in so 
> many interesting ways. *
>
> *The relative packing symmetry is very critical in the nucleus and 
> this accounts for the relative stability of various nuclei. A less 
> symmetrical structure, results in radioactivity and an unstable 
> nucleus. In this way, SuperLight helps to explain radioactivity. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY***
>
> *(The University Field or Energy Source) *
>
> *Einstein spent the last half of his life in search of a unifying 
> field theory that would unite all forces into one. I believe that with 
> SuperLight, a theory can be developed to explain this idea. 
> SuperLight; one force, once source. The concept I've developed is new, 
> and all aspects have not yet been considered, but what has been 
> covered appears to fit quite well with our current understanding of 
> reality. *
>
> *I propose that SuperLight energy is the singularity or universal 
> energy force in all nature and that its interaction with various forms 
> of matter and energy produce all other forces in the Universe. 
> Specific atomic structures and sub-atomic structures are resonant to 
> and interact with some aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them 
> and our bodies. The energy that is absorbed is converted into the 
> electrical, magnetic, nuclear and gravitational forces producing our 
> vital life force. This can explain all the forces of nature and life 
> energies. *
>
> *It is the geometry and density of matter that explains the different 
> forms and intensity of the forces that are produced. *
>
> *FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE***
>
> *As greater understanding of what types of devices 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td.htm> can attune to 
> SuperLight, I believe that it will be possible to capture this energy, 
> collect it, and measure it. At first only small assemblies will be 
> made for healing and regeneration, (only small amounts are needed) 
> scientific analysis, proof of principle and localized experiments. In 
> the future, I envision massive devices to be used as direct energy 
> converters. This development will have a significant effect on 
> reducing world pollution associated with most other energy producing 
> systems such as nuclear and fossil fuels. *
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *SUMMARY***
>
> *There is parity in the universe, therefore light has two forms: *
>
> *ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C.   (10^10 meters per 
> sec.) *
>
> *MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C squared. *
>
> *These lights are responsible for all created matter, all forces, and 
> life itself. As a result of this theory , I make the following 
> statements; *
>
> *LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY***
>
> *1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight reacting with 
> coherent structures in the body. *
>
> *2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from the interaction 
> with SuperLight. *
>
> *3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body. *
>
> *4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by exposure to higher 
> concentrations of SuperLight. *
>
> *5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the SuperLight wave bands. *
>
> *Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy***
>
> *1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether that reacts with all 
> matter and energy causing all forces. *
>
> *2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of matter, but only a 
> reaction to an external force. (e.g. SuperLight) *
>
> *3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, but only it's 
> reaction to acceleration through the ether of SuperLight's dynamic 
> field. *
>
> *4. It eliminates the problem of action at a distance. *
>
> *5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and solves Dr. Rubins 
> problem of the outer stars in galaxies "traveling too fast". (There is 
> a slight drag causing the stars to fall slowly into the center of the 
> galaxy.) *
>
> *6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but becomes less as 
> one approaches black holes, due to the reduction effect of SuperLight 
> radiating out of the black hole. *
>
> *7. This also means that the gravity constant becomes significantly 
> less at the edge of the Universe. *
>
> *8. It also allows black holes to reach an equilibrium state, — matter 
> in SuperLight out — thus preventing one black hole from becoming 
> massive and gobbling up the whole universe. *
>
> *9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are SuperLight. *
>
> *10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang and creation 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. For example: Since 
> gravity and inertia are the result of matter reacting with SuperLight, 
> which did not exist prior to the big bang, or in early times, then, 
> the Big Bang could have been a Little Bang (or a big breath)because 
> any force would cause and infinite acceleration, since there was 
> nothing to hold matter back. *
>
> *SuperLight And Space Travel***
>
> *Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will permit extreme 
> distant communication in space in much shorter times. (e.g. 100,000 
> light years in 3 to 4 minutes.) *
>
> *It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you travel in space, thus 
> permitting real deep space travel. *
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **
>
> *Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An
> Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy ***
>
>
>
> Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting,  You have to have a very 
> high volume capacity HVDC (negative)  ion generator like the Felici 
> 3,000 watt electrostatic generator.  When I was working with Leonard 
> Dorsett and his Super Steam Generator that put out CO2, Nitrogen and 
> water vapor, planned to incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion 
> genweration to enhance its proven fire fighting capability!  (Super 
> Steam Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference 1995) see YouTube.
>
>
> On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the 
>> Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all 
>> slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite 
>> communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems 
>> that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been 
>> widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for 
>> this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf 
>> wireless power device might give away the candy store...
>>
>> I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire 
>> control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject 
>> matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest fires 
>> and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the brief 
>> description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump 
>> connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator 
>> used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode 
>> rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages 
>> employed/required?   Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas 
>> magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in 
>> The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas 
>> Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers 
>> build for a short spell but have not found much more about these 
>> interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings.
>>
>> I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this 
>> effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to 
>> get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.
>>
>>
>> On 7/23/2018 12:48 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>> Date: 	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:08:28 -0500
>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>> To: 	Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Bert Pool 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> CC: 	Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain 
>>> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Lane 
>>> Wootan <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Phil 
>>> Rembold <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and 
>>> became friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics 
>>> (Southland Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets of 
>>> all size and shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing, 
>>> molding, firing and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite magnets. 
>>> EPA mandated the end of the use of barium in the manufacturing 
>>> process with a strontium substitute. The barium magnets became 
>>> available from Brazil and China. Back when I visited with Don Martin 
>>> and got the dimensions of Sparky's magnets  I found them at Edmund 
>>> Scientific so bought the exact same Sweet magnets. I was scrapping 
>>> sown all the main frame (IBM) computers in the DFW area and  found 
>>> that the early versions of the big hard drives had the barium 
>>> magnets which Joel and I used in the MRA (Mini Sweet).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear servos 
>>> in the read write heads.
>>>
>>> After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold electrical 
>>> output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) I realized 
>>> that much more had to be learned about this aspect of research. I 
>>> know you were involved to some extent.
>>>
>>> See: Sweet attachments in his own words!
>>>
>>> Before I got all bogged down with  my Hydrogen Production Process 
>>> and building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had 
>>> formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to 
>>> be made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype magnets built.
>>> Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I 
>>> accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet 
>>> Project. I guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still yet 
>>> to be realized!  Lol
>>> Norm
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Lots of stuff here.  I have been busy so need to back and review all.
>>>>
>>>> I did see a reference to barium ferrite.  Sparky sweet said the 
>>>> magnets he used had to be barium ferrite.  Most ceramic magnets of 
>>>> the size he was using are strontium ferrite.  To tell the 
>>>> difference I used, per his instructions, an ohm meter.  One 
>>>> conducts, the other doesn’t.  I forget which way it is.  Somewhere 
>>>> in my collection of boxes I think I have one of his magnets.  I’m 
>>>> still unpackingand organizing  after many, many moves so it will be 
>>>> awhile before I find it.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Toby
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>>>> Date: 	Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700
>>>>> From: 	[email protected][EVGRAY]<[email protected]>
>>>>> Reply-To: 	[email protected]
>>>>> To: 	[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting theory Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most other 
>>>>> people, I read your patent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference is 
>>>>> but there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or at 
>>>>> least a neutron missing.  Very interesting what happens with a 
>>>>> Coleman battery in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems 
>>>>> to know what a hole is, some say it's protons but I think proton 
>>>>> electricity is a different animal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so maybe 
>>>>> the mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it has no 
>>>>> neutron and would only need a proton to gather an electron. If it 
>>>>> shows up from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so we 
>>>>> do agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain forming in a 
>>>>> similar way.  When we have these weather systems starting on the 
>>>>> west cost and dumping billions of gallons all across the country 
>>>>> more than the clouds could ever hold.  As the high and lower 
>>>>> clouds commingle I thing they convert nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly 
>>>>> without a ground connection so they are in fact pumps.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and then 
>>>>> fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge from a 
>>>>> serious influence machine for the neutral spike.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Felici device sounds like something to build someday.  Also 
>>>>> interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the 
>>>>> Protium state.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea too.  I 
>>>>> think there are some deep truths in William Lynes writings even if 
>>>>> some of the whys and wherefores may be misinterpreted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to 
>>>>> pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic alignments 
>>>>> and restructuring.   I think Barrium Ferrite might be 
>>>>> piezoelectric, don't recall right now, but either way it seems to 
>>>>> be a very good insulator and something that can fraction electrons 
>>>>> from the B field.  I imagine you played with this stuff quite a 
>>>>> bit during your MRA design and likely noticed some interesting 
>>>>> aspects of the material.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape heads 
>>>>> for a OU lenz free generator.   He had a single sine wave freq and 
>>>>> claimed he could loop generating electricity in this way as the 
>>>>> tape passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts did not 
>>>>> seem to get loaded down.  Probably just another tuned high 
>>>>> impedance system.  Find it interesting as mag tape is mostly 
>>>>> barium ferrite particles.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential?  Well, here is 
>>>>>> what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on the 
>>>>>> spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background from free 
>>>>>> protons.  Please reviewIrving Langmuir 
>>>>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir>  Atomic 
>>>>>> Hydrogen.  Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is 
>>>>>> created in a 30 atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In 
>>>>>> the Lanfmuir torch a high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond 
>>>>>> creating monatomic hydrogen (atoms).  Same with the Felici 
>>>>>> Generator, the operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. According to Hal 
>>>>>> Puthoff, if a hydrogen atom looses an electron it is immediately 
>>>>>> replenished by the Zero Point space background. The Felici 
>>>>>> Generator is a zero Point Energy Generator or PUMP.  I had an 
>>>>>> interesting discussion with Ken (RIP) Shoulders at a New Energy 
>>>>>> Symposium in Denver. I asked him what type of power supply he 
>>>>>> used in charging his HVDC capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster 
>>>>>> experiments. His reply was an Electrostatic Influence Machine 
>>>>>> (Holtz Machine). He  said that if you apply a potential of lets 
>>>>>> say 100,000 Volts across a capacitor it will charge because you 
>>>>>> have stressed the dielectric (dielectric displacement). 
>>>>>> Interesting answer to say the least.  The charged capacitors will 
>>>>>> do work. Same with the Felici Generator for the 3,000 watt output 
>>>>>> will do work drawing the energy from the space background. See!  
>>>>>> Mick, I had to answer my own question for nobody thinks about the 
>>>>>> perplexing problems.  Ha! Ha!     Norm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / 
>>>>>>>> atom, where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV 
>>>>>>>> Electrostatic Generator??  I have issued this challenge before 
>>>>>>>> with no comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood. What is Heat?    
>>>>>>>>> Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes 
>>>>>>>>> due to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons 
>>>>>>>>> until all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW, 
>>>>>>>>> absolute zero conditions, there is no Browning Motion for 
>>>>>>>>> there are no holes for electrons to move in the atomic 
>>>>>>>>> lattice. See:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra 
>>>>>>>>> energy not just from the additional in the coil collapse but 
>>>>>>>>> from the neutral spike Norm is on to.  It is elusive because 
>>>>>>>>> it requires a solid negative pulse for that huge power return 
>>>>>>>>> strike just like lighting.  With positive lightening there is 
>>>>>>>>> no return strike.  The return mucks up everything silicon so 
>>>>>>>>> no wonder it has been completely engineered around.  It's 
>>>>>>>>> difficult to get solid negative with high voltage as the 
>>>>>>>>> oscillations provide as you know the counter field so the 
>>>>>>>>> proper neg polarity to input of a coil doesn't cut it but is a 
>>>>>>>>> good start.  This is why Tesla was using magnetic to fraction 
>>>>>>>>> out the negative traveling wave which is what he referred to 
>>>>>>>>> as radiant.  I am sure certain materials also contribute to a 
>>>>>>>>> more pure charge one way or the other just like with static 
>>>>>>>>> charges.  We just have to learn to use the proper materials in 
>>>>>>>>> our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/ 
>>>>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will 
>>>>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) 
>>>>>>>>> creating the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative 
>>>>>>>>> thunderstorm. Moray is interested in the positive lighting 
>>>>>>>>> producing the sprite events over the storms as photographed by 
>>>>>>>>> the ISIS Space Station. (interaction of the Hot positive 
>>>>>>>>> charge with the Cold Negative ionosphere.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   By
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist,
>>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool
>>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is
>>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super 
>>>>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea 
>>>>>>>>> of using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super 
>>>>>>>>> conductive Tesla Coil primary. Tesla understood the power of a 
>>>>>>>>> "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very high order! 
>>>>>>>>> "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> 
>

Reversing time must be illegal, every tech that does so goes away
quickly.  The quantum battery may be proven in a lab but will quickly go
away.


Great PCM demo!!  Notice how the mirror must take time to charge like a
cap.  Tried to locate optical grade BaTi around the time of the SA
article, had zero luck.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAy39ErqV34


On 7/26/2018 8:39 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm
>
> Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed).  When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder!
>
> Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame.
>
> See:  Super light!
>
>
> *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*
>
> *By:  Dr. John Mileweski***
>
> *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *
>
> *Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**.
> There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and
> opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and
> left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not
> light? *
>
> *Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all
> things except light. They are wrong. **  There is parity in light as
> well ! *
>
> *I will now explain and give you more detail. *
>
> *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by
> science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of
> years. It has been given different names by different cultures for
> thousands of years. *
>
> *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy,
> Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum
> Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception
> know it is real. *
>
> *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when
> James Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm>
> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was
> invented by Nikola Tesla
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and theoretical
> physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio waves.
> When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio
> waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation such as light,
> radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains
> 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that
> comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second solution"**was
> ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught algebra and
> were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root of –1)
> because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have changed
> and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and
> it is SuperLight. *
>
> *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford
> University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What
> does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *
>
> *To understand this second solution, we must first review what the
> first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows:
> Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point
> source (the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward
> infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a
> large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees
> to the electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. *
>
> *The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite
> structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point
> source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation
> is composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical
> component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the
> equations are looked at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight"
> travels at the speed of light squared !**  10^20 meters per second,  
> or 10 billion times faster than light
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *
>
> *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding,
> shorter wavelength.   It therefore has a higher energy density. *
>
> *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come
> we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?"  
> Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8
> nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes
> through everything as though the substance was nearly completely
> transparent (like glass). *
>
> *We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like
> x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative
> size, will be given later. *
>
> *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***
>
> *It comes out of black holes !***
>
> *First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the
> analogy for SuperLight. *
>
> *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric
> monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an
> electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or
> absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is
> converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the
> opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. *
>
> *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an
> electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its
> energy in the form of light. *
>
> *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot
> matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain
> magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small,
> extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering
> their orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight.
> So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of
> SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces
> of the black holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity
> of light and it therefore, can easily escape._{7} *
>
> *The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy
> in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of
> galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are
> literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an
> "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT and LIFE***
>
> *I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating energy in the
> universe and accounts for the production of what we call life. I
> believe SuperLight interacts with special forms of matter in our
> bodies and produces what we call Vital Life Forces. These special
> forms of matter are found in bones, micro–crystals and also in the
> various fluids in the body, that contain cell salts. There are also,
> believed to be organic molecules in some body fluids, that are
> believed to be liquid crystalline in structure. These change state
> (liquid to crystal) very readily, with a extremely small change in
> energy (e.g. emotions). *
>
> *Another form of organized structure found in the body, are the
> multitude of long parallel conductive protein structures, that form
> phase arrays like structures_{5} . Like the phased array radio
> telescope in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up extreme weak signals
> and amplify them, by being in phase. It is also suggested, that these
> proteins may have room temperature superconductivity. It is these
> organized structures in living things, that produce a coherence that
> has resonance with very minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of it
> passes through matter, between the nucleus and electron, without even
> coming in contact with them. *
>
> *Our body is electronic in nature_{2-5} and it is composed of millions
> and billions of micro–electronic units that are formed in structures
> that have a phase array organization_{3} . I believe that the
> electronic resonance in these organized conductive molecules, have
> some resonance with very small amounts of SuperLight and that these
> energy fields and currents are responsible for the human aura and the
> energy vortexes found in the body chakra area. They also produce the
> Vital Life Forces. But, since SuperLight is so powerful, even a very,
> very small amount produces more than enough energy to sustain life.
> Thus, life is produced and sustained by specific forms and amounts of
> organized matter, and old age and eventual death occurs when too much
> disorder and disease comes into our bodies and breaks up this ordered
> structure. At that point, the body can no longer produce enough Vital
> Life Force from SuperLight to sustain itself. I also believe that all
> forms of organized matter produce its own aura–finger–prints or energy
> signature when it reacts with SuperLight. *
>
> *There are many sensitive people, who can detect and read the aura of
> living entities and substances. Our body can determine whether this
> energy is good or bad for itself. I believe that this accounts for
> Kineseology and also explains how herbs work on the body. For example,
> each herb has an energy field signature that has a special attunement
> to specific body parts and its presence helps "kick off" or reactivate
> that energy center which may be slow or stopped, because of some
> illness or disease. Therefore, SuperLight to the rescue, through the
> herb structure that is appropriate to that area of the body in need. *
>
> *Crystals**to the rescue also. Crystals are very organized structures
> and thus according to this thesis are also converters or transducers
> of SuperLight. This is where their energy comes from and explains how
> they seemingly can radiate a positive signal continuously without
> being recharged. As with herbs, crystals and minerals of different
> chemistries and structures, develop different types of energy fields.
> This explains why different crystals have different effects on
> different parts of the body. The key to crystal healing is to match
> the required energy with the proper crystal that produces that
> specific energy need. *
>
> *As scientists and experimenters become more aware of SuperLight and
> start to understand it, experiments and instruments will be designed
> to attune to these energies. In the future, I conceive of
> manufacturing simulated body structures_{4} which will be micro–size
> phase array assemblies made of room temperature superconductors. They
> will be converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for healing.
> Specific micro–structures will be designed to attune to, and resonate
> with, the exact energy needed, in the specific part of the body that
> needs an energy boost for healing and regeneration. *
>
> *It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for thousands of
> years, and that their secret was that they, at times, would sleep in
> crystal lined caves and that this would rejuvenate their bodies,
> bringing healing and new growth. *
>
> *I propose that, in the very near future, I will be able to test this
> idea with the fiber crystal that I am making in my lab in Albuquerque.
> Soon, I hope to be able to grow my fiber crystals long enough, and in
> large enough quantities, that we will be able to spin these crystals
> into yarn. Once spun into yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be
> woven to make crystal cloth head and wristbands, hats, and meditation
> shawls. You could even stuff your mattress with crystal fiber, or
> cover your bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth wallpaper. This
> should stimulate creativity, imagination, healing and regeneration. *
>
> *Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I believe that it will be
> possible to make room temperature superconductors of crystal fiber. If
> this becomes possible, we are talking about levitation, and possibly
> even a magic carpet. *
>
> *So, the door is wide open with the possibilities of working with
> SuperLight energies, through the use of single crystal fibers. I
> believe these need to be high purity crystal fibers, in order to have
> the coherence necessary to resonate with SuperLight. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY*
>
> *Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, neither is inertia
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. These secondary
> forces are both formed by the reaction of matter to the dynamic field
> of SuperLight. Gravity is not an attraction! It is the result of a
> universal pressure, exerted by **SuperLight as it rains in from
> infinity, from all directions, onto every object**.   Materials are
> not 100% transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, perhaps about
> 99.99999999% transparent. As a consequence, all material domains, all
> "matter", experiences an acceleration caused by SuperLight. Every
> "particle" is affected by a slight drag, or pressure differential, as
> SuperLight travels past and through them. *
>
> *Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as SuperLight joins in,
> or exits the activities of the particle domain. Field effects come
> into play, as the SuperLight Entity travels through the Atomic
> Atmosphere producing drag. Drag turbulence and particle pressures
> combine to produce the accelerational force we know as gravity. *
>
> *This acceleration is of little consequence when a single object is in
> space, at a very great distance from other objects, since the force
> vectors cancel out. However, when a second object comes close to the
> first object, then, the two objects shield each other from the full
> power of SuperLight pressure on the opposite sides of the objects
> facing each other. As a result of this, the objects experience a net
> accelerational force toward each other, which is directly proportional
> to their mass. Mass that produces the mutual shielding that each
> object experiences. Thus, falsely, each object is said to be attracted
> to each other !   In reality, they are being pushed together by the
> net differential force of SuperLight pressure which results from the
> slight absorption of SuperLight as it passes through these objects.
> This, according to my theory, is what creates gravity. It is a push
> exerted by SuperLight, on objects shielding each other, from a portion
> of the SuperLight radiation. *
>
> *Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the effects of porous
> matter. An atom of matter is about 10^18 parts void for each part of
> solid matter. The wavelength of SuperLight is much smaller than the
> typical atomic dimension. Thus, most of SuperLight passes through the
> atomic structure unopposed. However, when SuperLight contacts the
> nucleus or electrons it produces the force that holds the electrons in
> orbit, and the nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This gives
> matter its chemical properties. Thus, gravity is the weak force since
> only a very small amount of SuperLight interacts with matter on the
> atomic scale. An example that will give you some idea as to how porous
> solid matter is, as follows: Let us expand the nucleus of an atom to
> the size of a golf ball, then the electrons in orbit about this
> nucleus would be about the size of a pea. Now when this pea makes its
> orbit about the golf ball its orbit is not a few feet or even a few
> yards in diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. Matter is
> mostly composed of void or space and the energy rays of SuperLight,
> whose wavelength is many times smaller than the diameter of the
> electron, will to a large extent miss the particle regions, as it
> rains through the atomic region. Only a small amount of SuperLight
> interacts with the nucleus and electrons while the majority will pass
> right through the region. *
>
> *NUCLEAR FORCE***
>
> *The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, when compared to
> that of the atom as a whole. The particles of matter in the nucleus
> are much closer to each other, than those in the electron. The nucleus
> is probably in the order of 10^28 more dense. Thus, the force that
> holds the nucleus together, must be very strong. *
>
> *In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight pushing and
> interacting, that holds the components of nucleus together. These
> stronger interactions on the nucleus, are a result of its increased
> relative density and ability to shield SuperLight. It is the density
> and geometry of matter that changes the forces we see. Thus, from One
> Source, comes the One Force, that divides and manifests itself in so
> many interesting ways. *
>
> *The relative packing symmetry is very critical in the nucleus and
> this accounts for the relative stability of various nuclei. A less
> symmetrical structure, results in radioactivity and an unstable
> nucleus. In this way, SuperLight helps to explain radioactivity. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY***
>
> *(The University Field or Energy Source) *
>
> *Einstein spent the last half of his life in search of a unifying
> field theory that would unite all forces into one. I believe that with
> SuperLight, a theory can be developed to explain this idea.
> SuperLight; one force, once source. The concept I've developed is new,
> and all aspects have not yet been considered, but what has been
> covered appears to fit quite well with our current understanding of
> reality. *
>
> *I propose that SuperLight energy is the singularity or universal
> energy force in all nature and that its interaction with various forms
> of matter and energy produce all other forces in the Universe.
> Specific atomic structures and sub-atomic structures are resonant to
> and interact with some aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them
> and our bodies. The energy that is absorbed is converted into the
> electrical, magnetic, nuclear and gravitational forces producing our
> vital life force. This can explain all the forces of nature and life
> energies. *
>
> *It is the geometry and density of matter that explains the different
> forms and intensity of the forces that are produced. *
>
> *FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE***
>
> *As greater understanding of what types of devices
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td.htm> can attune to
> SuperLight, I believe that it will be possible to capture this energy,
> collect it, and measure it. At first only small assemblies will be
> made for healing and regeneration, (only small amounts are needed)
> scientific analysis, proof of principle and localized experiments. In
> the future, I envision massive devices to be used as direct energy
> converters. This development will have a significant effect on
> reducing world pollution associated with most other energy producing
> systems such as nuclear and fossil fuels. *
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *SUMMARY***
>
> *There is parity in the universe, therefore light has two forms: *
>
> *ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C.   (10^10 meters per
> sec.) *
>
> *MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C squared. *
>
> *These lights are responsible for all created matter, all forces, and
> life itself. As a result of this theory , I make the following
> statements; *
>
> *LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY***
>
> *1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight reacting with
> coherent structures in the body. *
>
> *2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from the interaction
> with SuperLight. *
>
> *3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body. *
>
> *4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by exposure to higher
> concentrations of SuperLight. *
>
> *5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the SuperLight wave bands. *
>
> *Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy***
>
> *1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether that reacts with all
> matter and energy causing all forces. *
>
> *2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of matter, but only a
> reaction to an external force. (e.g. SuperLight) *
>
> *3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, but only it's
> reaction to acceleration through the ether of SuperLight's dynamic
> field. *
>
> *4. It eliminates the problem of action at a distance. *
>
> *5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and solves Dr. Rubins
> problem of the outer stars in galaxies "traveling too fast". (There is
> a slight drag causing the stars to fall slowly into the center of the
> galaxy.) *
>
> *6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but becomes less as
> one approaches black holes, due to the reduction effect of SuperLight
> radiating out of the black hole. *
>
> *7. This also means that the gravity constant becomes significantly
> less at the edge of the Universe. *
>
> *8. It also allows black holes to reach an equilibrium state, — matter
> in SuperLight out — thus preventing one black hole from becoming
> massive and gobbling up the whole universe. *
>
> *9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are SuperLight. *
>
> *10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang and creation
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. For example: Since
> gravity and inertia are the result of matter reacting with SuperLight,
> which did not exist prior to the big bang, or in early times, then,
> the Big Bang could have been a Little Bang (or a big breath)because
> any force would cause and infinite acceleration, since there was
> nothing to hold matter back. *
>
> *SuperLight And Space Travel***
>
> *Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will permit extreme
> distant communication in space in much shorter times. (e.g. 100,000
> light years in 3 to 4 minutes.) *
>
> *It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you travel in space, thus
> permitting real deep space travel. *
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * *
>
> *Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An
> Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy ***
>
>
>
> Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting,  You have to have a very
> high volume capacity HVDC (negative)  ion generator like the Felici
> 3,000 watt electrostatic generator.  When I was working with Leonard
> Dorsett and his Super Steam Generator that put out CO2, Nitrogen and
> water vapor, planned to incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion
> genweration to enhance its proven fire fighting capability!  (Super
> Steam Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference 1995) see YouTube.
>
>
> On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>  
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the
>> Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all
>> slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite
>> communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems
>> that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been
>> widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for
>> this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf
>> wireless power device might give away the candy store...
>>
>> I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire
>> control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject
>> matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest fires
>> and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the brief
>> description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump
>> connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator
>> used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode
>> rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages
>> employed/required?   Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas
>> magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in
>> The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas
>> Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers
>> build for a short spell but have not found much more about these
>> interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings.
>>
>> I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this
>> effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to
>> get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.
>>
>>
>> On 7/23/2018 12:48 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>> Date: 	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:08:28 -0500
>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>> To: 	Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Bert Pool
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> CC: 	Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain
>>> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Lane
>>> Wootan <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Phil
>>> Rembold <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and
>>> became friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics
>>> (Southland Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets of
>>> all size and shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing,
>>> molding, firing and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite magnets.
>>> EPA mandated the end of the use of barium in the manufacturing
>>> process with a strontium substitute. The barium magnets became
>>> available from Brazil and China. Back when I visited with Don Martin
>>> and got the dimensions of Sparky's magnets  I found them at Edmund
>>> Scientific so bought the exact same Sweet magnets. I was scrapping
>>> sown all the main frame  (IBM) computers in the DFW area and  found
>>> that the early versions of the big hard drives had the barium
>>> magnets which Joel and I used in the MRA (Mini Sweet).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear servos
>>> in the read write heads.
>>>
>>> After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold electrical
>>> output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) I realized
>>> that much more had to be learned about this aspect of research. I
>>> know you were involved to some extent.
>>>
>>> See: Sweet attachments in his own words!
>>>
>>> Before I got all bogged down with  my Hydrogen Production Process
>>> and building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had
>>> formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to
>>> be made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype magnets built.
>>> Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I
>>> accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet
>>> Project. I guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still yet
>>> to be realized!  Lol
>>> Norm
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Lots of stuff here.  I have been busy so need to back and review all.
>>>>
>>>> I did see a reference to barium ferrite.  Sparky sweet said the
>>>> magnets he used had to be barium ferrite.  Most ceramic magnets of
>>>> the size he was using are strontium ferrite.  To tell the
>>>> difference I used, per his instructions, an ohm meter.  One
>>>> conducts, the other doesn’t.  I forget which way it is.  Somewhere
>>>> in my collection of boxes I think I have one of his magnets.  I’m
>>>> still unpackingand organizing  after many, many moves so it will be
>>>> awhile before I find it.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Toby
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>>>> Date: 	Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700
>>>>> From: 	Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]>
>>>>> Reply-To: 	[email protected]
>>>>> To: 	[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting theory Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most other
>>>>> people, I read your patent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference is
>>>>> but there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or at
>>>>> least a neutron missing.  Very interesting what happens with a
>>>>> Coleman battery in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems
>>>>> to know what a hole is, some say it's protons but I think proton
>>>>> electricity is a different animal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so maybe
>>>>> the mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it has no
>>>>> neutron and would only need a proton to gather an electron.  If it
>>>>> shows up from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so we
>>>>> do agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain forming in a
>>>>> similar way.  When we have these weather systems starting on the
>>>>> west cost and dumping billions of gallons all across the country
>>>>> more than the clouds could ever hold.  As the high and lower
>>>>> clouds commingle I thing they convert nitrogen to hydrogen and
>>>>> oxygen. 
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly
>>>>> without a ground connection so they are in fact pumps.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and then
>>>>> fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge from a
>>>>> serious influence machine for the neutral spike.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Felici device sounds like something to build someday.  Also
>>>>> interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the
>>>>> Protium state.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea too.  I
>>>>> think there are some deep truths in William Lynes writings even if
>>>>> some of the whys and wherefores may be misinterpreted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to
>>>>> pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic alignments
>>>>> and restructuring.   I think Barrium Ferrite might be
>>>>> piezoelectric, don't recall right now, but either way it seems to
>>>>> be a very good insulator and something that can fraction electrons
>>>>> from the B field.  I imagine you played with this stuff quite a
>>>>> bit during your MRA design and likely noticed some interesting
>>>>> aspects of the material.  
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape heads
>>>>> for a OU lenz free generator.   He had a single sine wave freq and
>>>>> claimed he could loop generating electricity in this way as the
>>>>> tape passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts did not
>>>>> seem to get loaded down.  Probably just another tuned high
>>>>> impedance system.  Find it interesting as mag tape is mostly
>>>>> barium ferrite particles.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential?  Well, here is
>>>>>> what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on the
>>>>>> spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background from free
>>>>>> protons.  Please review Irving Langmuir
>>>>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir>  Atomic
>>>>>> Hydrogen.  Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is
>>>>>> created in a 30 atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In
>>>>>> the Lanfmuir torch a high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond
>>>>>> creating monatomic hydrogen (atoms).  Same with the Felici
>>>>>> Generator, the operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. According to Hal
>>>>>> Puthoff, if a hydrogen atom looses an electron it is immediately
>>>>>> replenished by the Zero Point space background.   The Felici
>>>>>> Generator is a zero Point Energy Generator or PUMP.  I had an
>>>>>> interesting discussion with Ken (RIP) Shoulders at a New Energy
>>>>>> Symposium in Denver. I asked him what type of power supply he
>>>>>> used in charging his HVDC capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster
>>>>>> experiments. His reply was an Electrostatic Influence Machine
>>>>>> (Holtz Machine).  He  said that if you apply a potential of lets
>>>>>> say 100,000 Volts across a capacitor it will charge because you
>>>>>> have stressed the dielectric (dielectric displacement).  
>>>>>> Interesting answer to say the least.  The charged capacitors will
>>>>>> do work.  Same with the Felici Generator for the 3,000 watt
>>>>>> output will do work  drawing the energy from the space
>>>>>> background.   See!  Mick, I had to answer my own question for
>>>>>> nobody thinks about the perplexing problems.  Ha! Ha!     Norm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron /
>>>>>>>> atom, where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV
>>>>>>>> Electrostatic Generator??  I have issued this challenge before
>>>>>>>> with no comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood.   What is
>>>>>>>>> Heat?    Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot
>>>>>>>>> surface = holes due to missing electrons vs cold surface=
>>>>>>>>> packing of electrons until all holes are filled (absolute zero
>>>>>>>>> conditions) BTW, absolute zero conditions, there is no
>>>>>>>>> Browning Motion for there are no holes for electrons to move
>>>>>>>>> in the atomic lattice. See:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra
>>>>>>>>> energy not just from the additional in the coil collapse but
>>>>>>>>> from the neutral spike Norm is on to.  It is elusive because
>>>>>>>>> it requires a solid negative pulse for that huge power return
>>>>>>>>> strike just like lighting.  With positive lightening there is
>>>>>>>>> no return strike.  The return mucks up everything silicon so
>>>>>>>>> no wonder it has been completely engineered around.  It's
>>>>>>>>> difficult to get solid negative with high voltage as the
>>>>>>>>> oscillations provide as you know the counter field so the
>>>>>>>>> proper neg polarity to input of a coil doesn't cut it but is a
>>>>>>>>> good start.  This is why Tesla was using magnetic to fraction
>>>>>>>>> out the negative traveling wave which is what he referred to
>>>>>>>>> as radiant.  I am sure certain materials also contribute to a
>>>>>>>>> more pure charge one way or the other just like with static
>>>>>>>>> charges.  We just have to learn to use the proper materials in
>>>>>>>>> our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>>>>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will
>>>>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold)
>>>>>>>>> creating the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative
>>>>>>>>> thunderstorm. Moray is interested in the positive lighting
>>>>>>>>> producing the sprite events over the storms as photographed by
>>>>>>>>> the ISIS Space Station. (interaction of the Hot positive
>>>>>>>>> charge with the Cold Negative ionosphere.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   By
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                      What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.  The reason for this
>>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.  My
>>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.  Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>>> junction.  Historically we find that  German physicist,
>>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.  Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.  It was not
>>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>>> reversed.  These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>>> differentials.  In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.  In
>>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.  The first
>>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.   With a
>>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.  Increasing
>>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>>> and voltage.  About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.   My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.  This is a directly
>>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.  We have
>>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.  Would
>>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.   Back in 1840
>>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.   After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.  The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.  More energy is present after
>>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>>> explained.  When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.  Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>>> question of,  What is heat?    We were told in the  school
>>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>>> of energy.  What is the form of this energy?  Let us look at
>>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>>> process.  When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.  The
>>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.  Now
>>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.  Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.  When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>>> (ions).  Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>>> how the process works.  All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.  Everything  in chemistry is
>>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>>> cooling effects.  Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.  This is a
>>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>>> current involved.   It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.  Remember
>>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.   I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>>> of experimentation.   Norm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super
>>>>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea
>>>>>>>>> of using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super
>>>>>>>>> conductive Tesla Coil primary.   Tesla understood the power of
>>>>>>>>> a "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very high order!  
>>>>>>>>> "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Nice one Norm



Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada's largest network.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
Date: 2018-07-26 12:12 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, Pre mbold <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?) [3 Attachments]





 [http://astrosa.com/n95/Image3.gif]



A S T R O  S A



INCORPORATED



Adelaide Branch

________________________________

Welcome to the May newsletter. This month I thought I would get away from the electronic type devices and feature a rather overlooked form of energy which has some interesting characteristics, this being STEAM!! It would appear that steam is not dead, but like a lot of other things the processes of production and use just need to be looked at in a different way. Maybe this will give you some ideas to try for yourself.

APRIL MEETING

This months meeting began at 8.1OPM with 23 people present with no apologies this month. Ashley began proceedings by welcoming newcomers James and his son Matteo, and also Dudley from the Byron Bay group who delayed his return to NSW so he could attend the meeting. Kevin reported that we are still in the black and now have enough money to subscribe to the Extraordinary Science magazine. I then read out the correspondence received during the last month. This included a letter and video tape from Lee in Sydney, a Searl Group newsletter, a Dennis Lee newsletter, information from TEAP in WA, a letter from the Byron Bay ASTRO group telling us that their submission for a government grant has been lodged, and some H2 news from Ian in VIC.

Ashley continued the meeting by presenting Tony with an article on how to have an intimate relationship over the Intemet, and if that doesn't work he can look at the pictures in the rest of the magazine. Ashley also presented the group with some more videos (details later), brought up the subject of leaded verses unleaded petrol as seen in an article in NEXUS magazine and mentioned an item which appeared on the local community TV station, ACE TV, on a new injection system for the Split Cycle engine.

Tony then gave us the first talk for the night which was on the MRA device and included an explanation of a miniature-version which has now surfaced using common over-the-counter type parts. Roger then gave a demonstration of the TOMI device which he constructed from the information shown in last months newsletter, and guess what???  IT WORKED!!!! This demonstration was backed up by Tony showing a computer simulation of a modified version of the TOMI device. Andrew followed with a talk on Steam Injection in motor vehicles and specifically on the system that he is presently constructing. Andrew also spoke on the John Whittman-Ray process of Body Electronics and the amazing results that have been achieved with this process. Both of Andrews talks were well presented and well received by those at the meeting.

The meeting was then put back to general discussion amidst a false start in the race to the biscuits. Dudley spoke briefly on his involvement with a Democratic School in Byron Bay and also on his other project of setting up the Sustainable Settlement Research Institute. Peter then produced a flyer that he found on books dealing with sustainable building methods, etc. while Allan spoke about some Dan Winter information and presented a report on Subliminal Tapes for people to read. Michael presented an alternative books catalogue that he found on the Internet and an article on a rather interesting modified Holden engine. Dino talked of an article that he saw/read/heard? about entraining light through fibre optic cable so that the light actually does the switching. Finally Cedric passed around some photographs of his Adams Motor tests that he has been doing, and quietly stated that he was getting overunity. Hopefully he can bring it along to the next meeting so we can all have a look. The meeting proper finished at 10.30PM with the usual sugar fix (no cream puffs this month) and the last people leaving around midnight.

SUPER STEAM TECHNOLOGY PART 1

Peter recently gave me a copy of "TheAquarian Newsletter" produced by an English company called Aquarian Agency Ltd. This newsletter basically promotes all the technology that they are trying to sell with their main product being Aquastone. which is a "non shrinking, highly insulating, fire resistant, fast setting (even underwater) material made from gypsum waste". The interesting side of their products include Victor Schauberger vortex research, a salt removing liquid called Rodak, aimed at the agricultural market and a water purification system called Care Free which works by using harmonic movements. Finally they are also into steam, in fact they are working on "super steam" similar to Leonard Dorsetts work (see next article) as shown by the following quote from their newsletter.

"SUPER STEAM - A Tesla conference in Colorado surfaces new Super Steam Technology (SST). Leonard Dorsett and friends from Texas share strikingly similar views to Aquarian Agency Ltd. They have technology which produces steam instantly at up to 3,000F without a boiler and with 60% savings in fuel over traditional boilers. Nitrogen rich, it can put out gasoline fires and treat many waste problems. Of major importance to Aquarian, this nitrogen-rich steam will help to produce heat and Aquastone at considerable savings."

For further information on Aquarian Agency Ltd. they can be contacted at 38 Weir Rd, Wimbledon, London SW19 SUG, England or on Internet at <aquarian ocign.ape.org>.

SUPER STEAM TECHNOLOGY PART 2[http://astrosa.com/n95/n059501.gif]

Leonard Dorsett (PO Box 365, Grapevine, TX 76092) demonstrated his Super Steam Technology at the 1994 International Tesla Symposium. SST is a system for producing steam at any temperature or pressure independently and instantly without the need for a conventional boiler. It can instantly produce steam of any temperature from hot water at 180F to super heated steam at over 3000F, while pressures can vary from 1PSI to 3000PSI with airflow volumes of 1CFM up to over 2000CFM. The system operates on propane, methane, petrol, kerosene, methanol, diesel, hydrogen or just about anything else that bums and converts virtually 100% of the fuel into usable energy. (Note: The person in the picture is Norman Wootan of MRA fame)

This all sounds great, but how does it work? The basis of the unit is a specially designed open throat chamber with controlled air, water and fuel interaction and a high voltage ignition resulting in a direct fire process establishing thermal zones. This creates a stoichiometric condition resulting in a full spectrum of steam product. Now comes the interesting part At the increased temperatures of steam, disassociation occurs. (Could this be a clue to running cars on water??) The hydrogen and oxygen reacts causing an exponential increase of energy resulting in super heated steam. A similar superheat process was addressed by Tesla in the October 12, 1911 publication of the "Engineering News Record".

Applications of the SST system include a much more economical way of producing electricity as no conventional boiler is needed. It will also be an ideal low cost method for heating and cooling homes and businesses. Small portable units can be developed for home use, such as steam cleaning, and insect and ant removal, without the dangers of insecticides. The system can also be used for low cost purification of polluted water or sewerage and can also convert salt water into drinking water both quickly and inexpensively. Other uses are in fire fighting applications, ice and snow removal from roads, etc. and sterilization and nurturing of soil for agriculture where contamination has occurred.

ERRATA: or I STUFFED UP!

Last months article on the TOMI device brought a response from Steve of the WA Searl group in that the reference to the SEG doesn't mean Space Energy Generator, but does mean Searl Effect Generator. The article came straight off Internet but nevertheless I did not pick up the mistake. This is the second time I have been sprung by Steve, the first being when I spelt Searl with an "e" on the end. Thanks for the feedback Steve.

THERMODYNAMICS OF STEAM

[http://astrosa.com/n95/n059502.gif] The following is an excerpt from a book by Floyd Clymer called "Historical Motor Scrapbook - Steam Car Edition Vol. I" kindly loaned to me by Peter. Although the explanation is designed for conventional steam engines, the article shows the tremendous amount of energy stored when PHASE CHANGE occurs from liquid to gas. This then raises the question that if steam can be produced "free" by using exhaust heat from a petrol engine, can this energy stored in the steam be used to generate extra motive power in the same engine?

"Latent Heat: If water be heated in an open vessel it will reach a temperature of approximately 212F (100C) and will then boil away without further rise in temperature. The added heat is absorbed in converting the water into steam.

It takes far more heat to convert water into steam than to raise its temperature. A pound of water heated to boiling from 32F absorbs only 18013TU, but in boiling away at 212F it absorbs an 996BTU additional. At atmospheric pressure the volume of steam is 1645 times the volume of water whence it came. This bulk of steam must displace an equal bulk of air, and part of the heat energy represented by the steam has been spent in pushing back the air to give it room. This will be made clearer from the sketch, showing a long tube open at the top and containing a little water in the bottom. On top of the water is a piston, supposed to be air-tight and without weight or friction. If the water be boiled into steam, the piston will be pushed upward against the atmospheric pressure a distance equal to 1645 times the original depth of the water. The work in foot-pounds thus done will be 14.7 times the area of the piston in square inches times the distance in feet through which it has moved. Approximately 7.45 percent of the heat imparted to the steam represents work done against the atmosphere; the remainder is spent overcoming the mutual attraction of the molecules of water. The heat which has been absorbed by the change of state from water to steam without change in temperature is called the latent heat of vaporisation."

ASTRO VIDEO LIBRARY

There has been a few new additions to our library this month thanks to Lee from Sydney (1994 International Tesla Symposium videos) and our very own Ashley (Borderland Science Research Foundation videos). These will all be available to borrow at the next meeting.

Daurn                                                 Tesla's Egg & the Philadelphia Experiment
Seifer                                                  Tesla: The Lost Years
Zeigler                                                 A Pre-Tesla Coil
Tesla Memorial Society                       Nikola Tesla: The Genius who lit the World
Jorge Resines - BSRF                          Invisible Radiations & the many Grid Theory
Gerry Vassilatos - BSRF                      Ray of Discovery 111 - Medical Radionics
Gerry Vasilatos - BSRF                        Ray of DiscoveryI - Nikola Tesla

FUEL/WATER VAPOUR SYSTEM WITH A DIFFERENCE

In another variation of fuel/water vapour injection is this idea which has apparently been tried with success by Mr Anonymous (and achieved 8OMPG). I have no personal knowledge of this system but it seems like an interesting combination of technologies which may just work. The general principle is to recirculate part of the exhaust gas back in through the carburettor. This has the effect of vaporising the fuel (and water if used) mixture using the heat from the exhaust gasses. This system is suited to a cross flow style of engine as the carburettor needs to be mounted at a distance from the inlet manifold to allow a smoother flow of gasses into the engine. The longer inlet pipe also allows time for the mixture to vaporise, (see diagram 1) and apparently can produce a turbo charging effect if the diameter and length of the pipe are calculated correctly.

[http://astrosa.com/n95/n059503.gif]
As the exhaust comes out of the engine , it passes through an exhaust splitter which allows some gas to exit from the normal exhaust pipe, while the rest is recirculated back into the inlet manifold. If water injection is to be added, it can be sprayed into the system at this point. The basic division of gas is set by an adjustable deflector inside the splitter (see diagram 2) while the amount required by the engine at any given time is adjusted by a butterfly valve in the tube. This valve is inter-connected with another one on the carburettor and one at the inlet manifold to maintain the correct air/fuel ratio. The butterfly at the exhaust splitter is temperature controlled so that it cannot operate until the engine is warm.

[http://astrosa.com/n95/n059504.gif]

STEAM INJECTION

Thankyou to Andrew for this article on steam injection which was the subject of his interesting talk at the last ASTRO meeting.
[http://astrosa.com/n95/n059505.gif]

"Water Vapour (water injection) is well known to increase the octane rating of petrol. (reduce knock or pinging) It also unfortunately reduces efficiency by robbing the fuel of a lot of its energy as it absorbs the Latent Heat of Vaporisation (refer to phase change technology). If however, the vaporisation of the water into steam is done outside of the combustion chamber, several interesting things happen.

The waste heat from the exhaust can be "harvested" and returned to the combustion process, producing steam at 300 to 400 degrees Celcius. This steam is introduced to the inlet manifold and instantly vaporises the fuel. This reduces the temperature of the mixture to approximately 150 degrees Celcius due to the phase change of the fuel. The resulting fuel vapour, steam and air mixture is more easily ignited than the fuel "droplets" and air mixture that occurs in an ordinary engine, thus enabling the correct fuel/air mixture to be maintained, but using significantly less fuel to do so. This is due to the fact that in a conventional engine, it is only the vapour that surrounds the fuel "droplets" that contributes to the fuel/air mixture, with the droplets only burning and creating heat in the process. The important thing is that all of the "heat" of combustion goes into expanding the mixture, while none is lost in vaporising the fuel, etc.

Another advantage of this process is that it gives lower exhaust emissions as combustion occurs at a much lower temperature due to the steam. This causes reduced Nitrous Oxide emissions in the exhaust. When carbon fuels burn in the presence of steam, the carbon robs the Oxygen from the water (H20) to form Carbon Dioxide (C02), leaving Hydrogen (H2) to burn as a separate combustion. Thus the exhaust gasses tend to be C02 + H2 + H20, rather than CO + C02 + H20, with the only compound not mentioned before being CO which is Carbon Monoxide.

Steam has a far greater Coefficient of Expansion than hot air: i.e. a smaller quantity will "push" a piston much further. Due to the lower temperature of combustion (fuel/air is approx. 2500C, while steam/fuel/air is approx. 750C) and the smaller charge of fuel/air in each induction, the engine runs at a greatly reduced temperature. This means that less of the fuel's energy ends up being lost in the radiator, exhaust and in direct radiation from the engine. This all adds up to improvements in fuel economy, less emissions, less exhaust noise and longer engine life. I estimate that the basic set up can be built for $300 to $400, which is one third the price of an LPG conversion. Fuel consumption should be about 25%, which for a Holden makes it around 100MPG!!! Andrew"

TWO MILES A MINUTE IN 19O6

The interesting thing about this bit of history is the method of producing the steam. Guess what, they burnt "gasoline" as a vapour!!!
[http://astrosa.com/n95/n059506.gif]
ROD MULLER &"THE CROW"

Although not "alternative" as we define the word, because this edition of the newsletter is about steam, and Rod keeps on inventing new ways to utilise this medium, I thought I would include this article from The Advertiser newspaper.

[http://astrosa.com/n95/n059507.gif]

A NEW PERSON IN OUR MIDST!

For those of you who don't know by now, Ian (who sometimes dowses his way to our meetings) and wife Frauke have a son, Lucas Gabriel, who was born on April 1st. Everyone is well and happy after a successful home birth.

NEXT MEETING

FRIDAY MAY 19TH

This month will feature the 30 minute video: NIKOLA TESLA:The Genius who lit the World

The usual applies in that please bring $3.00 to cover video purchase and newsletter printing/postage, and something for supper would be appreciated.I hope to see you all there !!!

On 7/26/2018 10:39 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:

http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm

Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed).  When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder!

Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame.

See:  Super light!



WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?
By:  Dr. John Mileweski
SuperLight is magnetic light; it is magneto–electric radiation.
Regular light is electric light or electro–magnetic radiation. There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not light?
Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all things except light. They are wrong.   There is parity in light as well !
I will now explain and give you more detail.
SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of years. It has been given different names by different cultures for thousands of years.
A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy, Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception know it is real.
SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when James Clerk Maxwell<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was invented by Nikola Tesla<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and theoretical physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that comes from the use of negative numbers, "this second solution" was ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught algebra and were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root of –1) because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have changed and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and it is SuperLight.
In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."{1}
To understand this second solution, we must first review what the first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point source (the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees to the electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation.
The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite structure. It explains that from infinity traveling toward the point source from all directions radiates SuperLight. This new radiation is composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the equations are looked at more closely, one finds that "SuperLight" travels at the speed of light squared !   1020 meters per second,   or 10 billion times faster than light<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>.
It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding, shorter wavelength.   It therefore has a higher energy density.
The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?"   Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10–8 nano–meters, or 4 x 10–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes through everything as though the substance was nearly completely transparent (like glass).
We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative size, will be given later.
WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?
It comes out of black holes !
First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the analogy for SuperLight.
Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light.
So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its energy in the form of light.
Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small, extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering their orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces of the black holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity of light and it therefore, can easily escape.{7}
The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether.
SUPERLIGHT and LIFE
I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating energy in the universe and accounts for the production of what we call life. I believe SuperLight interacts with special forms of matter in our bodies and produces what we call Vital Life Forces. These special forms of matter are found in bones, micro–crystals and also in the various fluids in the body, that contain cell salts. There are also, believed to be organic molecules in some body fluids, that are believed to be liquid crystalline in structure. These change state (liquid to crystal) very readily, with a extremely small change in energy (e.g. emotions).
Another form of organized structure found in the body, are the multitude of long parallel conductive protein structures, that form phase arrays like structures{5}. Like the phased array radio telescope in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up extreme weak signals and amplify them, by being in phase. It is also suggested, that these proteins may have room temperature superconductivity. It is these organized structures in living things, that produce a coherence that has resonance with very minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of it passes through matter, between the nucleus and electron, without even coming in contact with them.
Our body is electronic in nature{2-5} and it is composed of millions and billions of micro–electronic units that are formed in structures that have a phase array organization{3}. I believe that the electronic resonance in these organized conductive molecules, have some resonance with very small amounts of SuperLight and that these energy fields and currents are responsible for the human aura and the energy vortexes found in the body chakra area. They also produce the Vital Life Forces. But, since SuperLight is so powerful, even a very, very small amount produces more than enough energy to sustain life. Thus, life is produced and sustained by specific forms and amounts of organized matter, and old age and eventual death occurs when too much disorder and disease comes into our bodies and breaks up this ordered structure. At that point, the body can no longer produce enough Vital Life Force from SuperLight to sustain itself. I also believe that all forms of organized matter produce its own aura–finger–prints or energy signature when it reacts with SuperLight.
There are many sensitive people, who can detect and read the aura of living entities and substances. Our body can determine whether this energy is good or bad for itself. I believe that this accounts for Kineseology and also explains how herbs work on the body. For example, each herb has an energy field signature that has a special attunement to specific body parts and its presence helps "kick off" or reactivate that energy center which may be slow or stopped, because of some illness or disease. Therefore, SuperLight to the rescue, through the herb structure that is appropriate to that area of the body in need.
Crystals to the rescue also. Crystals are very organized structures and thus according to this thesis are also converters or transducers of SuperLight. This is where their energy comes from and explains how they seemingly can radiate a positive signal continuously without being recharged. As with herbs, crystals and minerals of different chemistries and structures, develop different types of energy fields. This explains why different crystals have different effects on different parts of the body. The key to crystal healing is to match the required energy with the proper crystal that produces that specific energy need.
As scientists and experimenters become more aware of SuperLight and start to understand it, experiments and instruments will be designed to attune to these energies. In the future, I conceive of manufacturing simulated body structures{4} which will be micro–size phase array assemblies made of room temperature superconductors. They will be converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for healing. Specific micro–structures will be designed to attune to, and resonate with, the exact energy needed, in the specific part of the body that needs an energy boost for healing and regeneration.
It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for thousands of years, and that their secret was that they, at times, would sleep in crystal lined caves and that this would rejuvenate their bodies, bringing healing and new growth.
I propose that, in the very near future, I will be able to test this idea with the fiber crystal that I am making in my lab in Albuquerque. Soon, I hope to be able to grow my fiber crystals long enough, and in large enough quantities, that we will be able to spin these crystals into yarn. Once spun into yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be woven to make crystal cloth head and wristbands, hats, and meditation shawls. You could even stuff your mattress with crystal fiber, or cover your bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth wallpaper. This should stimulate creativity, imagination, healing and regeneration.
Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I believe that it will be possible to make room temperature superconductors of crystal fiber. If this becomes possible, we are talking about levitation, and possibly even a magic carpet.
So, the door is wide open with the possibilities of working with SuperLight energies, through the use of single crystal fibers. I believe these need to be high purity crystal fibers, in order to have the coherence necessary to resonate with SuperLight.
SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY
Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, neither is inertia<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. These secondary forces are both formed by the reaction of matter to the dynamic field of SuperLight. Gravity is not an attraction! It is the result of a universal pressure, exerted by SuperLight as it rains in from infinity, from all directions, onto every object.   Materials are not 100% transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, perhaps about 99.99999999% transparent. As a consequence, all material domains, all "matter", experiences an acceleration caused by SuperLight. Every "particle" is affected by a slight drag, or pressure differential, as SuperLight travels past and through them.
Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as SuperLight joins in, or exits the activities of the particle domain. Field effects come into play, as the SuperLight Entity travels through the Atomic Atmosphere producing drag. Drag turbulence and particle pressures combine to produce the accelerational force we know as gravity.
This acceleration is of little consequence when a single object is in space, at a very great distance from other objects, since the force vectors cancel out. However, when a second object comes close to the first object, then, the two objects shield each other from the full power of SuperLight pressure on the opposite sides of the objects facing each other. As a result of this, the objects experience a net accelerational force toward each other, which is directly proportional to their mass. Mass that produces the mutual shielding that each object experiences. Thus, falsely, each object is said to be attracted to each other !   In reality, they are being pushed together by the net differential force of SuperLight pressure which results from the slight absorption of SuperLight as it passes through these objects. This, according to my theory, is what creates gravity. It is a push exerted by SuperLight, on objects shielding each other, from a portion of the SuperLight radiation.
Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the effects of porous matter. An atom of matter is about 1018 parts void for each part of solid matter. The wavelength of SuperLight is much smaller than the typical atomic dimension. Thus, most of SuperLight passes through the atomic structure unopposed. However, when SuperLight contacts the nucleus or electrons it produces the force that holds the electrons in orbit, and the nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This gives matter its chemical properties. Thus, gravity is the weak force since only a very small amount of SuperLight interacts with matter on the atomic scale. An example that will give you some idea as to how porous solid matter is, as follows: Let us expand the nucleus of an atom to the size of a golf ball, then the electrons in orbit about this nucleus would be about the size of a pea. Now when this pea makes its orbit about the golf ball its orbit is not a few feet or even a few yards in diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. Matter is mostly composed of void or space and the energy rays of SuperLight, whose wavelength is many times smaller than the diameter of the electron, will to a large extent miss the particle regions, as it rains through the atomic region. Only a small amount of SuperLight interacts with the nucleus and electrons while the majority will pass right through the region.
NUCLEAR FORCE
The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, when compared to that of the atom as a whole. The particles of matter in the nucleus are much closer to each other, than those in the electron. The nucleus is probably in the order of 1028 more dense. Thus, the force that holds the nucleus together, must be very strong.
In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight pushing and interacting, that holds the components of nucleus together. These stronger interactions on the nucleus, are a result of its increased relative density and ability to shield SuperLight. It is the density and geometry of matter that changes the forces we see. Thus, from One Source, comes the One Force, that divides and manifests itself in so many interesting ways.
The relative packing symmetry is very critical in the nucleus and this accounts for the relative stability of various nuclei. A less symmetrical structure, results in radioactivity and an unstable nucleus. In this way, SuperLight helps to explain radioactivity.
SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY
(The University Field or Energy Source)
Einstein spent the last half of his life in search of a unifying field theory that would unite all forces into one. I believe that with SuperLight, a theory can be developed to explain this idea. SuperLight; one force, once source. The concept I've developed is new, and all aspects have not yet been considered, but what has been covered appears to fit quite well with our current understanding of reality.
I propose that SuperLight energy is the singularity or universal energy force in all nature and that its interaction with various forms of matter and energy produce all other forces in the Universe. Specific atomic structures and sub-atomic structures are resonant to and interact with some aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them and our bodies. The energy that is absorbed is converted into the electrical, magnetic, nuclear and gravitational forces producing our vital life force. This can explain all the forces of nature and life energies.
It is the geometry and density of matter that explains the different forms and intensity of the forces that are produced.
FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE
As greater understanding of what types of devices<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td.htm> can attune to SuperLight, I believe that it will be possible to capture this energy, collect it, and measure it. At first only small assemblies will be made for healing and regeneration, (only small amounts are needed) scientific analysis, proof of principle and localized experiments. In the future, I envision massive devices to be used as direct energy converters. This development will have a significant effect on reducing world pollution associated with most other energy producing systems such as nuclear and fossil fuels.
________________________________
SUMMARY
There is parity in the universe, therefore light has two forms:
ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C.   (1010 meters per sec.)
MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C squared.
These lights are responsible for all created matter, all forces, and life itself. As a result of this theory , I make the following statements;
LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY
1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight reacting with coherent structures in the body.
2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from the interaction with SuperLight.
3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body.
4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by exposure to higher concentrations of SuperLight.
5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the SuperLight wave bands.
Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy
1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether that reacts with all matter and energy causing all forces.
2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of matter, but only a reaction to an external force. (e.g. SuperLight)
3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, but only it's reaction to acceleration through the ether of SuperLight's dynamic field.
4. It eliminates the problem of action at a distance.
5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and solves Dr. Rubins problem of the outer stars in galaxies "traveling too fast". (There is a slight drag causing the stars to fall slowly into the center of the galaxy.)
6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but becomes less as one approaches black holes, due to the reduction effect of SuperLight radiating out of the black hole.
7. This also means that the gravity constant becomes significantly less at the edge of the Universe.
8. It also allows black holes to reach an equilibrium state, — matter in SuperLight out — thus preventing one black hole from becoming massive and gobbling up the whole universe.
9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are SuperLight.
10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang and creation<http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. For example: Since gravity and inertia are the result of matter reacting with SuperLight, which did not exist prior to the big bang, or in early times, then, the Big Bang could have been a Little Bang (or a big breath)because any force would cause and infinite acceleration, since there was nothing to hold matter back.
SuperLight And Space Travel
Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will permit extreme distant communication in space in much shorter times. (e.g. 100,000 light years in 3 to 4 minutes.)
It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you travel in space, thus permitting real deep space travel.
________________________________

Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An
Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy



Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting,  You have to have a very high volume capacity HVDC (negative)  ion generator like the Felici 3,000 watt electrostatic generator.  When I was working with Leonard Dorsett and his Super Steam Generator that put out CO2, Nitrogen and water vapor, planned to incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion genweration to enhance its proven fire fighting capability!  (Super Steam Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference 1995) see YouTube.


On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:


Norm,

Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless power device might give away the candy store...

I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the brief description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages employed/required?   Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings.

I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.

On 7/23/2018 12:48 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:08:28 -0500
From:   Norman Wootan <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
To:     Toby Grotz <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Bert Pool <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
CC:     Bob Paddock <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Lane Wootan <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>



Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and became friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics (Southland Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets of all size and shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing, molding, firing and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite magnets. EPA mandated the end of the use of barium in the manufacturing process with a strontium substitute. The barium magnets became available from Brazil and China. Back when I visited with Don Martin and got the dimensions of Sparky's magnets  I found them at Edmund Scientific so bought the exact same Sweet magnets. I was scrapping sown all the main frame  (IBM) computers in the DFW area and  found that the early versions of the big hard drives had the barium magnets which Joel and I used in the MRA (Mini Sweet).

[cid:[email protected]]

[cid:[email protected]]

[cid:[email protected]]

The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear servos in the read write heads.

After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold electrical output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) I realized that much more had to be learned about this aspect of research. I know you were involved to some extent.

See: Sweet attachments in his own words!

Before I got all bogged down with  my Hydrogen Production Process and building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to be made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype magnets built.
Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet Project. I guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still yet to be realized!  Lol
Norm


On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
Hello all,

Lots of stuff here.  I have been busy so need to back and review all.

I did see a reference to barium ferrite.  Sparky sweet said the magnets he used had to be barium ferrite.  Most ceramic magnets of the size he was using are strontium ferrite.  To tell the difference I used, per his instructions, an ohm meter.  One conducts, the other doesn’t.  I forget which way it is.  Somewhere in my collection of boxes I think I have one of his magnets.  I’m still unpackingand organizing  after many, many moves so it will be awhile before I find it.

BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used.





Toby

On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
Date:   Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700
From:   Mick [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To:       [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>




Interesting theory Norm,

I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most other people, I read your patent.

Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference is but there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or at least a neutron missing.  Very interesting what happens with a Coleman battery in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems to know what a hole is, some say it's protons but I think proton electricity is a different animal.

Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so maybe the mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it has no neutron and would only need a proton to gather an electron.  If it shows up from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning.

It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so we do agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain forming in a similar way.  When we have these weather systems starting on the west cost and dumping billions of gallons all across the country more than the clouds could ever hold.  As the high and lower clouds commingle I thing they convert nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen.

I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly without a ground connection so they are in fact pumps.

OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and then fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge from a serious influence machine for the neutral spike.

The Felici device sounds like something to build someday.  Also interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the Protium state.

Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea too.  I think there are some deep truths in William Lynes writings even if some of the whys and wherefores may be misinterpreted.

Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic alignments and restructuring.   I think Barrium Ferrite might be piezoelectric, don't recall right now, but either way it seems to be a very good insulator and something that can fraction electrons from the B field.  I imagine you played with this stuff quite a bit during your MRA design and likely noticed some interesting aspects of the material.

There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape heads for a OU lenz free generator.   He had a single sine wave freq and claimed he could loop generating electricity in this way as the tape passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts did not seem to get loaded down.  Probably just another tuned high impedance system.  Find it interesting as mag tape is mostly barium ferrite particles.

On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:



Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential?  Well, here is what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on the spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background from free protons.  Please review Irving Langmuir<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir>  Atomic Hydrogen.  Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is created in a 30 atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In the Lanfmuir torch a high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond creating monatomic hydrogen (atoms).  Same with the Felici Generator, the operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. According to Hal Puthoff, if a hydrogen atom looses an electron it is immediately replenished by the Zero Point space background.   The Felici Generator is a zero Point Energy Generator or PUMP.  I had an interesting discussion with Ken (RIP) Shoulders at a New Energy Symposium in Denver. I asked him what type of power supply he used in charging his HVDC capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster experiments. His reply was an Electrostatic Influence Machine (Holtz Machine).  He  said that if you apply a potential of lets say 100,000 Volts across a capacitor it will charge because you have stressed the dielectric (dielectric displacement).   Interesting answer to say the least.  The charged capacitors will do work.  Same with the Felici Generator for the 3,000 watt output will do work  drawing the energy from the space background.   See!  Mick, I had to answer my own question for nobody thinks about the perplexing problems.  Ha! Ha!     Norm

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding

On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, Mick [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:



Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device!

On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:



http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm

Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / atom, where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV Electrostatic Generator??  I have issued this challenge before with no comments.


On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:



Going back to a subject not fully understood.   What is Heat?    Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes due to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons until all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW, absolute zero conditions, there is no Browning Motion for there are no holes for electrons to move in the atomic lattice. See:

https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen



Kone,

I am working with the ground return so there is the
extra energy not just from the additional in the
coil collapse but from the neutral spike Norm is on
to.  It is elusive because it requires a solid
negative pulse for that huge power return strike
just like lighting.  With positive lightening there
is no return strike.  The return mucks up everything
silicon so no wonder it has been completely
engineered around.  It's difficult to get solid
negative with high voltage as the oscillations
provide as you know the counter field so the proper
neg polarity to input of a coil doesn't cut it but
is a good start.  This is why Tesla was using
magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling wave
which is what he referred to as radiant.  I am sure
certain materials also contribute to a more pure
charge one way or the other just like with static
charges.  We just have to learn to use the proper
materials in our coils for the expected outcomes.


http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/

If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) creating the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative thunderstorm.  Moray is interested in the positive lighting producing the sprite events over the storms as photographed by the ISIS Space Station.  (interaction of the Hot positive charge with the Cold Negative ionosphere.)







What is Heat ?

By

Norman L. Wootan
Battle Creek Farms
22825 FM709N
Hubbard, TX 76648
(214)907-0010
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


                     What is Heat #2

For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
electrical power around the phenomenon.  The reason for this
interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
from the ambient background via thermal differentials.  My
line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
electronic cooling devices.  Would you believe that most
people do not understand how these devices move thermal
energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
junction.  Historically we find that  German physicist,
Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
electrical energy resulted.  Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.  It was not
until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
melted when the polarity of the direct current was
reversed.  These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
materials which could provide the wide temperature
differentials.  In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
available which revived the electric cooling principles.  In
the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.  The first
Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.   With a
small temperature differential across the device a weak
current with an attendant voltage was developed.  Increasing
the differential provided a proportional increase in current
and voltage.  About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
the KeelyNet BBS.   My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
thermal energy across the junction.  This is a directly
reversible situation based on polarity.
Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
change material such as water and refrigerants.  We have
always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.  Would
you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
provides an attendant electrical effect.   Back in 1840
Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
passing through the nozzles.   After reading an old (1920 s)
Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
not purely mechanical.  The atoms of the material lose or
gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
transitions between phases.  More energy is present after
the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
explained.  When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
totally not understood by modern science.  Now my suspicions
were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
question of,  What is heat?    We were told in the  school
that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
of energy.  What is the form of this energy?  Let us look at
a very simple example of heating which may explain this
process.  When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
heated because electrons in the material are converted to
photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.  The
more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.  Now
the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
net negative state or cold.  Heat or cold is based on the
ion relationship in the material.  When we apply a flame
(ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
(ions).  Since the energy is in the form of presence or
absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
how the process works.  All phase change processes work the
same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
processes which we were taught.  Everything  in chemistry is
an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
cooling effects.  Now we see Patents issued based on
negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
cool because it becomes net negative charged.  This is a
very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
generator operates at very high voltages with very little
current involved.   It is possible to develop this ion
transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
output from very subtle temperature differentials.  Remember
that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
differential will cause a development of current and voltage
as in the Peltier device.   I hope that this dialog will
provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
of experimentation.   Norm

BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super conductive Tesla Coil primary.   Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very high order!   "Hmmmmn"!

Great stuff Ole!

There was something called a magnetic rectifier using a vacuum tube and
magnet I have heard of but not much info yet.  I found that page about
Tesla spark gaps also, nice job the author did.

A great way for a DC HV impulse supply is mechanically interrupted DC
charged caps, hard to improve on!  A cap can also be considered a
converter between two different types of electricity as it strips out
the B field.  Also converts cold electricity back to hot.


On 7/26/2018 2:05 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Hi Mick,
>
> "Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but
> the description and drawing are available in The inventions,
> researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin. 
> There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short
> spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed
> devices that the occasional mutterings"
>
> The Poulsen arc was the kind of arc transmitters used until the
> invention of tubes. Here is Valdemar Poulsen's  patent (US789449)
> which use a flame and magnetism to control the arc:
> https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP
> <https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP#>
>
> Wikipedia article: https://wiki2.org/en/Arc_converter
> From the Wikipedia article:
>
> Duddell arc (and other early types)
>
> In the first type of arc oscillator, the AC current in the condenser
> i_0 is much smaller than the DC supply current i_1 , and the arc is
> never extinguished during an output cycle. The Duddell arc is an
> example of the first type, but the first type is not practical for RF
> transmitters.
>
> Poulsen arc
>
>     In the second type of arc oscillator, the condenser AC discharge
>     current is large enough to extinguish the arc but not large enough
>     to restart the arc in the opposite direction. This second type is
>     the Poulsen arc.
>
> Quenched spark gap
>
>     In the third type of arc oscillator, the arc extinguishes but may
>     reignite when the condenser current reverses. The third case is a
>     quenched spark gap and produces damped oscillations.
>
>
> https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/history/spark-gap-transmitters/poulsen-arc-transmitter.php
>
> http://ethw.org/Milestones:Poulsen-Arc_Radio_Transmitter,_1902
>
> The history of Tesla's spark gaps and arcs:
> https://waveguide.blog/teslas-spark-gaps-literature-review/
> After the spark gaps and arcs came the tube era. Tesla used tubes too
> according to the story from his nephew about the ride in Tesla's
> electric car.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>
> Norm,
>
> Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the
> Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all
> slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite
> communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems that
> maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely
> applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this
> purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless
> power device might give away the candy store...
>
> I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control. 
> Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter.  Do you
> think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what
> is required to build a prototype?  From the brief description
> available it appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg
> ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires
> you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks
> sufficient or are more relativistic voltages employed/required?  
> Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but
> the description and drawing are available in The inventions,
> researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin. 
> There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short
> spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed
> devices that the occasional mutterings.
>
> I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this
> effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to
> get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.
>
> ...
>

Hi Mick,

The magnetic rectifier dates back to Tesla before the vacuum tube. Tesla had to supply DC for arc lamps when implementing AC on the grid. TESLA PATENT 413,353 METHOD OF OBTAINING DIRECT FROM ALTERNATING CURRENTS https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-413353-method-obtaining-direct-alternating-currents.

"A great way for a DC HV impulse supply is mechanically interrupted DC charged caps, hard to improve on!"
Using a transistor to switch off the current through a coil is a very common way to generate HV pulses. That way is used in auto ignition systems and in the old CRT screens. The generated flyback voltage is limited by a capacitor to an acceptable value. In the CRT screens the flyback voltage is further transformed up in one or more secondary coils and rectified into a capacitor. This is the EHT (extremely high tension) for accelerating the electron beam.

"A cap can also be considered a converter between two different types of electricity as it strips out the B field.  Also converts cold electricity back to hot."
The B field is caused by the current and cannot be avoided when the charges start moving. Read transmission line theory or William .J. Hooper or Ivor Catt or Wilbert B. Smith. They all more or less state that electromagnetism is a unified field theory where the separate disciplines really can't be handled alone. Hooper tried to cancel out the different kind of fields. By canceling one kind of field in electromagnetism will only leave the other kinds intact. It all depends on the observer. When the observer moves along with a moving charge the magnetic field part of the charge won't be seen. A fixed observer will see the moving charge having a magnetic field around it.

An analogy will be an observer watching a boat moving. When the observer moves alongside with the boat no waves (magnetic field analogy) will be seen. At least the waves are seen as static or frozen (electric field analogy). When the observer is fixed the waves will be seen emitted from the boat passing by.

 The paper by Floyd Sweet 'Nothing is Something https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/EVGRAY/attachments/1517767915' that Norman attached also issues this.

Regards
Ole
 

---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :

 Great stuff Ole!
 There was something called a magnetic rectifier using a vacuum tube and magnet I have heard of but not much info yet.  I found that page about Tesla spark gaps also, nice job the author did.
 A great way for a DC HV impulse supply is mechanically interrupted DC charged caps, hard to improve on!  A cap can also be considered a converter between two different types of electricity as it strips out the B field.  Also converts cold electricity back to hot.

 
 On 7/26/2018 2:05 AM, onielsen@... mailto:onielsen@... [EVGRAY] wrote:

   Hi Mick,
 
 "Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings"
 
 The Poulsen arc was the kind of arc transmitters used until the invention of tubes. Here is Valdemar Poulsen's  patent (US789449) which use a flame and magnetism to control the arc: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP#
 
 Wikipedia article: https://wiki2.org/en/Arc_converter https://wiki2.org/en/Arc_converter
 From the Wikipedia article:

 Duddell arc (and other early types) In the first type of arc oscillator, the AC current in the condenser i0 is much smaller than the DC supply current i1, and the arc is never extinguished during an output cycle. The Duddell arc is an example of the first type, but the first type is not practical for RF transmitters.

 Poulsen arc In the second type of arc oscillator, the condenser AC discharge current is large enough to extinguish the arc but not large enough to restart the arc in the opposite direction. This second type is the Poulsen arc. Quenched spark gap In the third type of arc oscillator, the arc extinguishes but may reignite when the condenser current reverses. The third case is a quenched spark gap and produces damped oscillations. 
 https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/history/spark-gap-transmitters/poulsen-arc-transmitter.php https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/history/spark-gap-transmitters/poulsen-arc-transmitter.php
 
 http://ethw.org/Milestones:Poulsen-Arc_Radio_Transmitter,_1902 http://ethw.org/Milestones:Poulsen-Arc_Radio_Transmitter,_1902
 
 The history of Tesla's spark gaps and arcs: https://waveguide.blog/teslas-spark-gaps-literature-review/ https://waveguide.blog/teslas-spark-gaps-literature-review/
 After the spark gaps and arcs came the tube era. Tesla used tubes too according to the story from his nephew about the ride in Tesla's electric car.
 
 Regards
 Ole 
 
 ---In [email protected] mailto:[email protected], <mkjekyll@...> mailto:mkjekyll@... wrote :
 
 Norm,
 Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless power device might give away the candy store...
 I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the brief description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages employed/required?   Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings.
 I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.

 ...

MickWe are having interrupted communications as often I am unable to open attachments on my phone.What you seem to be describing is a device Tesla would certainly be familiar with, and have in abundance, a Model T spark coil.Being able to make use of the high voltage signals from one of these devices would be interesting.I have found the spark, which is about 25 cycles ( guessing) is surprisingly strong, easily igniting a sheet of printer paper, placed in the spark gap.This buzzer runs on 6 volts DC, without Lenz's law draw, or so it appears, as once it goes to the spark gap, there is the end of the battery load to it.Yet that spark doesn't stop there, as anyone knows one the receiving end of one of these coils.What brings this to mind, is that I bought an old new stock one, at a local antique store, in town, for $15., this week.I have always had one around, as they are useful, as well as ornamental, in their wooden boxes with brass and steel steam punk appearance, which, of course, they really are.I have used them in my career for all kinds of movie magic tricks, as I have said, that spark packs a wallop, from that little self contained package.HOW can we use 10,000 volts of pulsed DC?Hector hinted by innuendo that buzzers can be useful.Well these little suckers are super charged 6 volt DC input packages.Playing with the radiant might just be productive, without all the bother of making stuff electronically?Cheers WarrenSent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 at 2:32 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY]<[email protected]> wrote:       
 

Great stuff Ole!
 
There was something called a magnetic rectifier using a vacuum tube and magnet I have heard of but not much info yet.  I found that page about Tesla spark gaps also, nice job the author did.
 
A great way for a DC HV impulse supply is mechanically interrupted DC charged caps, hard to improve on!  A cap can also be considered a converter between two different types of electricity as it strips out the B field.  Also converts cold electricity back to hot.
 
 
 On 7/26/2018 2:05 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
  
      
Hi Mick,
 
 "Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings"
 
 The Poulsen arc was the kind of arc transmitters used until the invention of tubes. Here is Valdemar Poulsen's  patent (US789449) which use a flame and magnetism to control the arc: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP
 
 Wikipedia article: https://wiki2.org/en/Arc_converter
 From the Wikipedia article:
 
    
   - Duddell arc (and other early types)
 In the first type of arc oscillator, the AC current in the condenser i0 is much smaller than the DC supply current i1, and the arc is never extinguished during an output cycle. The Duddell arc is an example of the first type, but the first type is not practical for RF transmitters.
     
   - Poulsen arc
    
      - In the second type of arc oscillator, the condenser AC discharge current is large enough to extinguish the arc but not large enough to restart the arc in the opposite direction. This second type is the Poulsen arc.
    
   - Quenched spark gap
    
      - In the third type of arc oscillator, the arc extinguishes but may reignite when the condenser current reverses. The third case is a quenched spark gap and produces damped oscillations.
 
 https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/history/spark-gap-transmitters/poulsen-arc-transmitter.php
 
 http://ethw.org/Milestones:Poulsen-Arc_Radio_Transmitter,_1902
 
 The history of Tesla's spark gaps and arcs: https://waveguide.blog/teslas-spark-gaps-literature-review/
 After the spark gaps and arcs came the tube era. Tesla used tubes too according to the story from his nephew about the ride in Tesla's electric car.
 
 Regards
 Ole 
 
 ---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
 
  
Norm,
 
Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf wireless power device might give away the candy store...
 
I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest fires and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the brief description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages employed/required?   Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings.
 
I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.
 
 ...    
 
  #yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751 -- #yiv4313812751ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mkp #yiv4313812751hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mkp #yiv4313812751ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mkp .yiv4313812751ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mkp .yiv4313812751ad p {margin:0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mkp .yiv4313812751ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-sponsor #yiv4313812751ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-sponsor #yiv4313812751ygrp-lc #yiv4313812751hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-sponsor #yiv4313812751ygrp-lc .yiv4313812751ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751activity span .yiv4313812751underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 dd.yiv4313812751last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4313812751 dd.yiv4313812751last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4313812751 dd.yiv4313812751last p span.yiv4313812751yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751file-title a, #yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751file-title a:active, #yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751file-title a:hover, #yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751photo-title a, #yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751photo-title a:active, #yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751photo-title a:hover, #yiv4313812751 div.yiv4313812751photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 div#yiv4313812751ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4313812751ygrp-msg p a span.yiv4313812751yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv4313812751 o {font-size:0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv4313812751 .yiv4313812751replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv4313812751 input, #yiv4313812751 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv4313812751 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4313812751logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-msg p#yiv4313812751attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-reco #yiv4313812751reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-sponsor #yiv4313812751ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-sponsor #yiv4313812751ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-sponsor #yiv4313812751ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv4313812751 #yiv4313812751ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv4313812751

Ole, yes you are entirely correct about once the charge starts moving
and that it is relative.  When the charge is stored in the cap the B
field is fractioned out and decoupled until discharge.  Leigh Page also
has some interesting data concerning relativistic interpretations of EM
and also gets into Black Body radiation from an interesting standpoint.


On 7/29/2018 1:55 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Hi Mick,
>
> The magnetic rectifier dates back to Tesla before the vacuum tube.
> Tesla had to supply DC for arc lamps when implementing AC on the grid.
> TESLA PATENT 413,353 METHOD OF OBTAINING DIRECT FROM ALTERNATING
> CURRENTS
> <https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-413353-method-obtaining-direct-alternating-currents>.
>
> "A great way for a DC HV impulse supply is mechanically interrupted DC
> charged caps, hard to improve on!"
> Using a transistor to switch off the current through a coil is a very
> common way to generate HV pulses. That way is used in auto ignition
> systems and in the old CRT screens. The generated flyback voltage is
> limited by a capacitor to an acceptable value. In the CRT screens the
> flyback voltage is further transformed up in one or more secondary
> coils and rectified into a capacitor. This is the EHT (extremely high
> tension) for accelerating the electron beam.
>
> "A cap can also be considered a converter between two different types
> of electricity as it strips out the B field.  Also converts cold
> electricity back to hot."
> The B field is caused by the current and cannot be avoided when the
> charges start moving. Read transmission line theory or William .J.
> Hooper or Ivor Catt or Wilbert B. Smith. They all more or less state
> that electromagnetism is a unified field theory where the separate
> disciplines really can't be handled alone. Hooper tried to cancel out
> the different kind of fields. By canceling one kind of field in
> electromagnetism will only leave the other kinds intact. It all
> depends on the observer. When the observer moves along with a moving
> charge the magnetic field part of the charge won't be seen. A fixed
> observer will see the moving charge having a magnetic field around it.
>
> An analogy will be an observer watching a boat moving. When the
> observer moves alongside with the boat no waves (magnetic field
> analogy) will be seen. At least the waves are seen as static or frozen
> (electric field analogy). When the observer is fixed the waves will be
> seen emitted from the boat passing by.
>
> The paper by Floyd Sweet 'Nothing is Something
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/EVGRAY/attachments/1517767915>'
> that Norman attached also issues this.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>
> Great stuff Ole!
>
> There was something called a magnetic rectifier using a vacuum tube
> and magnet I have heard of but not much info yet.  I found that page
> about Tesla spark gaps also, nice job the author did.
>
> A great way for a DC HV impulse supply is mechanically interrupted DC
> charged caps, hard to improve on!  A cap can also be considered a
> converter between two different types of electricity as it strips out
> the B field.  Also converts cold electricity back to hot.
>
>
> On 7/26/2018 2:05 AM, onielsen@... <mailto:onielsen@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>>      
>>
>>     Hi Mick,
>>
>>     "Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap
>>     but the description and drawing are available in The inventions,
>>     researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford
>>     Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build
>>     for a short spell but have not found much more about these
>>     interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings"
>>
>>     The Poulsen arc was the kind of arc transmitters used until the
>>     invention of tubes. Here is Valdemar Poulsen's  patent (US789449)
>>     which use a flame and magnetism to control the arc:
>>     https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP
>>     <https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=US&NR=789449A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=1&date=19050509&DB=&locale=en_EP#>
>>
>>     Wikipedia article: https://wiki2.org/en/Arc_converter
>>     From the Wikipedia article:
>>
>>     Duddell arc (and other early types)
>>
>>     In the first type of arc oscillator, the AC current in the
>>     condenser i_0 is much smaller than the DC supply current i_1 ,
>>     and the arc is never extinguished during an output cycle. The
>>     Duddell arc is an example of the first type, but the first type
>>     is not practical for RF transmitters.
>>
>>     Poulsen arc
>>
>>         In the second type of arc oscillator, the condenser AC
>>         discharge current is large enough to extinguish the arc but
>>         not large enough to restart the arc in the opposite
>>         direction. This second type is the Poulsen arc.
>>
>>     Quenched spark gap
>>
>>         In the third type of arc oscillator, the arc extinguishes but
>>         may reignite when the condenser current reverses. The third
>>         case is a quenched spark gap and produces damped oscillations.
>>
>>
>>     https://www.electronics-notes.com/articles/history/spark-gap-transmitters/poulsen-arc-transmitter.php
>>
>>     http://ethw.org/Milestones:Poulsen-Arc_Radio_Transmitter,_1902
>>
>>     The history of Tesla's spark gaps and arcs:
>>     https://waveguide.blog/teslas-spark-gaps-literature-review/
>>     After the spark gaps and arcs came the tube era. Tesla used tubes
>>     too according to the story from his nephew about the ride in
>>     Tesla's electric car.
>>
>>     Regards
>>     Ole
>>
>>
>>     ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>     <mkjekyll@...> <mailto:mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>>
>>     Norm,
>>
>>     Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after
>>     the Scientific American released the time reversed light article
>>     that all slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors
>>     for satellite communications and all sorts of other applications
>>     but no.  Seems that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as
>>     it should have been widely applied by now with all the carbide
>>     fets designed just for this purpose, could it be that loose
>>     coupling an off the shelf wireless power device might give away
>>     the candy store...
>>
>>     I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire
>>     control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject
>>     matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest
>>     fires and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the
>>     brief description available it appeared to be some sort of air
>>     pump connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the
>>     generator used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of
>>     15 kv diode rectified flybacks sufficient or are more
>>     relativistic voltages employed/required?   Interesting I have not
>>     found patent of Teslas magnetic spark gap but the description and
>>     drawing are available in The inventions, researches and writings
>>     of Nikola Tesla by Thomas Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to
>>     be magnetic vacuum rectifiers build for a short spell but have
>>     not found much more about these interesting claimed devices that
>>     the occasional mutterings.
>>
>>     I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this
>>     effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary? 
>>     Need to get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so
>>     much to build.
>>
>>     ...
>
>