Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?) [3 Attachments]

Body

*A S T R O  S A*

*INCORPORATED*


/Adelaide Branch
/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to the May newsletter. This month I thought I would get away 
from the electronic type devices and feature a rather overlooked form of 
energy which has some interesting characteristics, this being STEAM!! It 
would appear that steam is not dead, but like a lot of other things the 
processes of production and use just need to be looked at in a different 
way. Maybe this will give you some ideas to try for yourself.

*_APRIL MEETING_*

This months meeting began at 8.1OPM with 23 people present with no 
apologies this month. Ashley began proceedings by welcoming newcomers 
James and his son Matteo, and also Dudley from the Byron Bay group who 
delayed his return to NSW so he could attend the meeting. Kevin reported 
that we are still in the black and now have enough money to subscribe to 
the Extraordinary Science magazine. I then read out the correspondence 
received during the last month. This included a letter and video tape 
from Lee in Sydney, a Searl Group newsletter, a Dennis Lee newsletter, 
information from TEAP in WA, a letter from the Byron Bay ASTRO group 
telling us that their submission for a government grant has been lodged, 
and some H2 news from Ian in VIC.

Ashley continued the meeting by presenting Tony with an article on how 
to have an intimate relationship over the Intemet, and if that doesn't 
work he can look at the pictures in the rest of the magazine. Ashley 
also presented the group with some more videos (details later), brought 
up the subject of leaded verses unleaded petrol as seen in an article in 
NEXUS magazine and mentioned an item which appeared on the local 
community TV station, ACE TV, on a new injection system for the Split 
Cycle engine.

Tony then gave us the first talk for the night which was on the MRA 
device and included an explanation of a miniature-version which has now 
surfaced using common over-the-counter type parts. Roger then gave a 
demonstration of the TOMI device which he constructed from the 
information shown in last months newsletter, and guess what???  IT 
WORKED!!!! This demonstration was backed up by Tony showing a computer 
simulation of a modified version of the TOMI device. Andrew followed 
with a talk on Steam Injection in motor vehicles and specifically on the 
system that he is presently constructing. Andrew also spoke on the John 
Whittman-Ray process of Body Electronics and the amazing results that 
have been achieved with this process. Both of Andrews talks were well 
presented and well received by those at the meeting.

The meeting was then put back to general discussion amidst a false start 
in the race to the biscuits. Dudley spoke briefly on his involvement 
with a Democratic School in Byron Bay and also on his other project of 
setting up the Sustainable Settlement Research Institute. Peter then 
produced a flyer that he found on books dealing with sustainable 
building methods, etc. while Allan spoke about some Dan Winter 
information and presented a report on Subliminal Tapes for people to 
read. Michael presented an alternative books catalogue that he found on 
the Internet and an article on a rather interesting modified Holden 
engine. Dino talked of an article that he saw/read/heard? about 
entraining light through fibre optic cable so that the light actually 
does the switching. Finally Cedric passed around some photographs of his 
Adams Motor tests that he has been doing, and quietly stated that he was 
getting overunity. Hopefully he can bring it along to the next meeting 
so we can all have a look. The meeting proper finished at 10.30PM with 
the usual sugar fix (no cream puffs this month) and the last people 
leaving around midnight.

*_SUPER STEAM TECHNOLOGY PART 1_*

Peter recently gave me a copy of "TheAquarian Newsletter" produced by an 
English company called Aquarian Agency Ltd. This newsletter basically 
promotes all the technology that they are trying to sell with their main 
product being Aquastone. which is a "non shrinking, highly insulating, 
fire resistant, fast setting (even underwater) material made from gypsum 
waste". The interesting side of their products include Victor 
Schauberger vortex research, a salt removing liquid called Rodak, aimed 
at the agricultural market and a water purification system called Care 
Free which works by using harmonic movements. Finally they are also into 
steam, in fact they are working on "super steam" similar to Leonard 
Dorsetts work (see next article) as shown by the following quote from 
their newsletter.

"*SUPER STEAM* - A Tesla conference in Colorado surfaces new Super Steam 
Technology (SST). Leonard Dorsett and friends from Texas share 
strikingly similar views to Aquarian Agency Ltd. They have technology 
which produces steam instantly at up to 3,000F without a boiler and with 
60% savings in fuel over traditional boilers. Nitrogen rich, it can put 
out gasoline fires and treat many waste problems. Of major importance to 
Aquarian, this nitrogen-rich steam will help to produce heat and 
Aquastone at considerable savings."

For further information on Aquarian Agency Ltd. they can be contacted at 
38 Weir Rd, Wimbledon, London SW19 SUG, England or on Internet at 
<aquarian ocign.ape.org>.

*_SUPER STEAM TECHNOLOGY PART 2_*

Leonard Dorsett (PO Box 365, Grapevine, TX 76092) demonstrated his Super 
Steam Technology at the 1994 International Tesla Symposium. SST is a 
system for producing steam at any temperature or pressure independently 
and instantly without the need for a conventional boiler. It can 
instantly produce steam of any temperature from hot water at 180F to 
super heated steam at over 3000F, while pressures can vary from 1PSI to 
3000PSI with airflow volumes of 1CFM up to over 2000CFM. The system 
operates on propane, methane, petrol, kerosene, methanol, diesel, 
hydrogen or just about anything else that bums and converts virtually 
100% of the fuel into usable energy. (Note: The person in the picture is 
Norman Wootan of MRA fame)

This all sounds great, but how does it work? The basis of the unit is a 
specially designed open throat chamber with controlled air, water and 
fuel interaction and a high voltage ignition resulting in a direct fire 
process establishing thermal zones. This creates a stoichiometric 
condition resulting in a full spectrum of steam product. Now comes the 
interesting part At the increased temperatures of steam, disassociation 
occurs. (Could this be a clue to running cars on water??) The hydrogen 
and oxygen reacts causing an exponential increase of energy resulting in 
super heated steam. A similar superheat process was addressed by Tesla 
in the October 12, 1911 publication of the "Engineering News Record".

Applications of the SST system include a much more economical way of 
producing electricity as no conventional boiler is needed. It will also 
be an ideal low cost method for heating and cooling homes and 
businesses. Small portable units can be developed for home use, such as 
steam cleaning, and insect and ant removal, without the dangers of 
insecticides. The system can also be used for low cost purification of 
polluted water or sewerage and can also convert salt water into drinking 
water both quickly and inexpensively. Other uses are in fire fighting 
applications, ice and snow removal from roads, etc. and sterilization 
and nurturing of soil for agriculture where contamination has occurred.

*_ERRATA: or I STUFFED UP!_*

Last months article on the TOMI device brought a response from Steve of 
the WA Searl group in that the reference to the SEG doesn't mean Space 
Energy Generator, but does mean Searl Effect Generator. The article came 
straight off Internet but nevertheless I did not pick up the mistake. 
This is the second time I have been sprung by Steve, the first being 
when I spelt Searl with an "e" on the end. Thanks for the feedback Steve.

*_THERMODYNAMICS OF STEAM_*

The following is an excerpt from a book by Floyd Clymer called 
"Historical Motor Scrapbook - Steam Car Edition Vol. I" kindly loaned to 
me by Peter. Although the explanation is designed for conventional steam 
engines, the article shows the tremendous amount of energy stored when 
PHASE CHANGE occurs from liquid to gas. This then raises the question 
that if steam can be produced "free" by using exhaust heat from a petrol 
engine, can this energy stored in the steam be used to generate extra 
motive power in the same engine?

"Latent Heat: If water be heated in an open vessel it will reach a 
temperature of approximately 212F (100C) and will then boil away without 
further rise in temperature. The added heat is absorbed in converting 
the water into steam.

It takes far more heat to convert water into steam than to raise its 
temperature. A pound of water heated to boiling from 32F absorbs only 
18013TU, but in boiling away at 212F it absorbs an 996BTU additional. At 
atmospheric pressure the volume of steam is 1645 times the volume of 
water whence it came. This bulk of steam must displace an equal bulk of 
air, and part of the heat energy represented by the steam has been spent 
in pushing back the air to give it room. This will be made clearer from 
the sketch, showing a long tube open at the top and containing a little 
water in the bottom. On top of the water is a piston, supposed to be 
air-tight and without weight or friction. If the water be boiled into 
steam, the piston will be pushed upward against the atmospheric pressure 
a distance equal to 1645 times the original depth of the water. The work 
in foot-pounds thus done will be 14.7 times the area of the piston in 
square inches times the distance in feet through which it has moved. 
Approximately 7.45 percent of the heat imparted to the steam represents 
work done against the atmosphere; the remainder is spent overcoming the 
mutual attraction of the molecules of water. The heat which has been 
absorbed by the change of state from water to steam without change in 
temperature is called the latent heat of vaporisation."

*_ASTRO VIDEO LIBRARY_*

There has been a few new additions to our library this month thanks to 
Lee from Sydney (1994 International Tesla Symposium videos) and our very 
own Ashley (Borderland Science Research Foundation videos). These will 
all be available to borrow at the next meeting.

Daurn                                                 Tesla's Egg & the 
Philadelphia Experiment
Seifer                                                  Tesla: The Lost 
Years
Zeigler                                                 A Pre-Tesla Coil
Tesla Memorial Society                       Nikola Tesla: The Genius 
who lit the World
Jorge Resines - BSRF                          Invisible Radiations & the 
many Grid Theory
Gerry Vassilatos - BSRF                      Ray of Discovery 111 - 
Medical Radionics
Gerry Vasilatos - BSRF                        Ray of DiscoveryI - Nikola 
Tesla

*_FUEL/WATER VAPOUR SYSTEM WITH A DIFFERENCE_*

In another variation of fuel/water vapour injection is this idea which 
has apparently been tried with success by Mr Anonymous (and achieved 
8OMPG). I have no personal knowledge of this system but it seems like an 
interesting combination of technologies which may just work. The general 
principle is to recirculate part of the exhaust gas back in through the 
carburettor. This has the effect of vaporising the fuel (and water if 
used) mixture using the heat from the exhaust gasses. This system is 
suited to a cross flow style of engine as the carburettor needs to be 
mounted at a distance from the inlet manifold to allow a smoother flow 
of gasses into the engine. The longer inlet pipe also allows time for 
the mixture to vaporise, (see diagram 1) and apparently can produce a 
turbo charging effect if the diameter and length of the pipe are 
calculated correctly.


As the exhaust comes out of the engine , it passes through an exhaust 
splitter which allows some gas to exit from the normal exhaust pipe, 
while the rest is recirculated back into the inlet manifold. If water 
injection is to be added, it can be sprayed into the system at this 
point. The basic division of gas is set by an adjustable deflector 
inside the splitter (see diagram 2) while the amount required by the 
engine at any given time is adjusted by a butterfly valve in the tube. 
This valve is inter-connected with another one on the carburettor and 
one at the inlet manifold to maintain the correct air/fuel ratio. The 
butterfly at the exhaust splitter is temperature controlled so that it 
cannot operate until the engine is warm.

*_STEAM INJECTION_*

Thankyou to Andrew for this article on steam injection which was the 
subject of his interesting talk at the last ASTRO meeting.

"Water Vapour (water injection) is well known to increase the octane 
rating of petrol. (reduce knock or pinging) It also unfortunately 
reduces efficiency by robbing the fuel of a lot of its energy as it 
absorbs the Latent Heat of Vaporisation (refer to phase change 
technology). If however, the vaporisation of the water into steam is 
done outside of the combustion chamber, several interesting things happen.

The waste heat from the exhaust can be "harvested" and returned to the 
combustion process, producing steam at 300 to 400 degrees Celcius. This 
steam is introduced to the inlet manifold and instantly vaporises the 
fuel. This reduces the temperature of the mixture to approximately 150 
degrees Celcius due to the phase change of the fuel. The resulting fuel 
vapour, steam and air mixture is more easily ignited than the fuel 
"droplets" and air mixture that occurs in an ordinary engine, thus 
enabling the correct fuel/air mixture to be maintained, but using 
significantly less fuel to do so. This is due to the fact that in a 
conventional engine, it is only the vapour that surrounds the fuel 
"droplets" that contributes to the fuel/air mixture, with the droplets 
only burning and creating heat in the process. The important thing is 
that all of the "heat" of combustion goes into expanding the mixture, 
while none is lost in vaporising the fuel, etc.

Another advantage of this process is that it gives lower exhaust 
emissions as combustion occurs at a much lower temperature due to the 
steam. This causes reduced Nitrous Oxide emissions in the exhaust. When 
carbon fuels burn in the presence of steam, the carbon robs the Oxygen 
from the water (H20) to form Carbon Dioxide (C02), leaving Hydrogen (H2) 
to burn as a separate combustion. Thus the exhaust gasses tend to be C02 
+ H2 + H20, rather than CO + C02 + H20, with the only compound not 
mentioned before being CO which is Carbon Monoxide.

Steam has a far greater Coefficient of Expansion than hot air: i.e. a 
smaller quantity will "push" a piston much further. Due to the lower 
temperature of combustion (fuel/air is approx. 2500C, while 
steam/fuel/air is approx. 750C) and the smaller charge of fuel/air in 
each induction, the engine runs at a greatly reduced temperature. This 
means that less of the fuel's energy ends up being lost in the radiator, 
exhaust and in direct radiation from the engine. This all adds up to 
improvements in fuel economy, less emissions, less exhaust noise and 
longer engine life. I estimate that the basic set up can be built for 
$300 to $400, which is one third the price of an LPG conversion. Fuel 
consumption should be about 25%, which for a Holden makes it around 
100MPG!!! Andrew"

*_TWO MILES A MINUTE IN 19O6_*

The interesting thing about this bit of history is the method of 
producing the steam. Guess what, they burnt "gasoline" as a vapour!!!

*_ROD MULLER &"THE CROW"_*

Although not "alternative" as we define the word, because this edition 
of the newsletter is about steam, and Rod keeps on inventing new ways to 
utilise this medium, I thought I would include this article from The 
Advertiser newspaper.



*_A NEW PERSON IN OUR MIDST!_*

For those of you who don't know by now, Ian (who sometimes dowses his 
way to our meetings) and wife Frauke have a son, Lucas Gabriel, who was 
born on April 1st. Everyone is well and happy after a successful home birth.

*_NEXT MEETING_*

*_FRIDAY MAY 19TH_*


This month will feature the 30 minute video: *_NIKOLA TESLA:The Genius 
who lit the World_*

The usual applies in that please bring $3.00 to cover video purchase and 
newsletter printing/postage, and something for supper would be 
appreciated.I hope to see you all there !!!


On 7/26/2018 10:39 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/part4.htm
>
> Mick! I too find it interesting that the Info in the Scientific American article, phase conjucate mirror of laser via barium titinate crystal kind of dropped from view! (time reversed).  When you read all of the papers, kind of makes you wonder!
>
> Bert Pool alerted me to the Scientific American article regarding the Satellite Killer Phase Conjugate mirror weapon possibility. 1994 time frame.
>
> See:  Super light!
>
>
> *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*
>
> *By:Dr. John Mileweski***
>
> *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *
>
> *Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**. 
> There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal and 
> opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right and 
> left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why not 
> light? *
>
> *Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all 
> things except light. They are wrong. **  There is parity in light as 
> well ! *
>
> *I will now explain and give you more detail. *
>
> *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by 
> science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of 
> years. It has been given different names by different cultures for 
> thousands of years. *
>
> *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy, 
> Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum 
> Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception 
> know it is real. *
>
> *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when 
> James Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm> 
> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio was 
> invented by Nikola Tesla 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and theoretical 
> physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio waves. 
> When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this explains radio 
> waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic radiation such as light, 
> radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What his equation also explains 
> 100 years ago was SuperLight but because it was the solution that 
> comes from the use of negative numbers, **"this second solution"**was 
> ignored for over 100 years. Remember when you were taught algebra and 
> were told to ignore imaginary numbers (e.g. The square root of –1) 
> because they have no meaning in this world. Well, times have changed 
> and now we have a very valid second solution to Maxwell's equation and 
> it is SuperLight. *
>
> *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford 
> University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What 
> does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *
>
> *To understand this second solution, we must first review what the 
> first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as follows: 
> Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space from a point 
> source (the antenna) equally in all directions into space toward 
> infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is composed of a 
> large electrical component and a small magnetic component 90 degrees 
> to the electrical component. Thus named, electro–magnetic radiation. *
>
> *The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite 
> structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the point 
> source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new radiation 
> is composed of a large magnetic component and a small electrical 
> component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation. When the 
> equations are looked at more closely, one finds that **"SuperLight" 
> travels at the speed of light squared !**  10^20 meters per second,   
> or 10 billion times faster than light 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *
>
> *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a corresponding, 
> shorter wavelength.   It therefore has a higher energy density. *
>
> *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how come 
> we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected scientifically?"   
> Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length so short, (4 x 10^–8 
> nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its velocity so fast, that it goes 
> through everything as though the substance was nearly completely 
> transparent (like glass). *
>
> *We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like 
> x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative 
> size, will be given later. *
>
> *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***
>
> *It comes out of black holes !***
>
> *First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make the 
> analogy for SuperLight. *
>
> *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric 
> monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is an 
> electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off or 
> absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation. Sunlight is 
> converted into electricity by this process in a solar cell. Just the 
> opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert electricity into light. *
>
> *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an 
> electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its 
> energy in the form of light. *
>
> *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and hot 
> matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes contain 
> magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely small, 
> extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by lowering 
> their orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our SuperLight. 
> So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant beings of 
> SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong gravitation forces 
> of the black holes because its velocity is the square of the velocity 
> of light and it therefore, can easily escape._{7} *
>
> *The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every galaxy 
> in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and billions of 
> galaxies all around us, and they all are producing SuperLight. We are 
> literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic energy field, or an 
> "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT and LIFE***
>
> *I believe that SuperLight is the prime activating energy in the 
> universe and accounts for the production of what we call life. I 
> believe SuperLight interacts with special forms of matter in our 
> bodies and produces what we call Vital Life Forces. These special 
> forms of matter are found in bones, micro–crystals and also in the 
> various fluids in the body, that contain cell salts. There are also, 
> believed to be organic molecules in some body fluids, that are 
> believed to be liquid crystalline in structure. These change state 
> (liquid to crystal) very readily, with a extremely small change in 
> energy (e.g. emotions). *
>
> *Another form of organized structure found in the body, are the 
> multitude of long parallel conductive protein structures, that form 
> phase arrays like structures_{5} . Like the phased array radio 
> telescope in Socorro, New Mexico, they pick up extreme weak signals 
> and amplify them, by being in phase. It is also suggested, that these 
> proteins may have room temperature superconductivity. It is these 
> organized structures in living things, that produce a coherence that 
> has resonance with very minute amounts of SuperLight. Most of it 
> passes through matter, between the nucleus and electron, without even 
> coming in contact with them. *
>
> *Our body is electronic in nature_{2-5} and it is composed of millions 
> and billions of micro–electronic units that are formed in structures 
> that have a phase array organization_{3} . I believe that the 
> electronic resonance in these organized conductive molecules, have 
> some resonance with very small amounts of SuperLight and that these 
> energy fields and currents are responsible for the human aura and the 
> energy vortexes found in the body chakra area. They also produce the 
> Vital Life Forces. But, since SuperLight is so powerful, even a very, 
> very small amount produces more than enough energy to sustain life. 
> Thus, life is produced and sustained by specific forms and amounts of 
> organized matter, and old age and eventual death occurs when too much 
> disorder and disease comes into our bodies and breaks up this ordered 
> structure. At that point, the body can no longer produce enough Vital 
> Life Force from SuperLight to sustain itself. I also believe that all 
> forms of organized matter produce its own aura–finger–prints or energy 
> signature when it reacts with SuperLight. *
>
> *There are many sensitive people, who can detect and read the aura of 
> living entities and substances. Our body can determine whether this 
> energy is good or bad for itself. I believe that this accounts for 
> Kineseology and also explains how herbs work on the body. For example, 
> each herb has an energy field signature that has a special attunement 
> to specific body parts and its presence helps "kick off" or reactivate 
> that energy center which may be slow or stopped, because of some 
> illness or disease. Therefore, SuperLight to the rescue, through the 
> herb structure that is appropriate to that area of the body in need. *
>
> *Crystals**to the rescue also. Crystals are very organized structures 
> and thus according to this thesis are also converters or transducers 
> of SuperLight. This is where their energy comes from and explains how 
> they seemingly can radiate a positive signal continuously without 
> being recharged. As with herbs, crystals and minerals of different 
> chemistries and structures, develop different types of energy fields. 
> This explains why different crystals have different effects on 
> different parts of the body. The key to crystal healing is to match 
> the required energy with the proper crystal that produces that 
> specific energy need. *
>
> *As scientists and experimenters become more aware of SuperLight and 
> start to understand it, experiments and instruments will be designed 
> to attune to these energies. In the future, I conceive of 
> manufacturing simulated body structures_{4} which will be micro–size 
> phase array assemblies made of room temperature superconductors. They 
> will be converters SuperLight into Vital Life Force for healing. 
> Specific micro–structures will be designed to attune to, and resonate 
> with, the exact energy needed, in the specific part of the body that 
> needs an energy boost for healing and regeneration. *
>
> *It is said, that the priests in Atlantis lived for thousands of 
> years, and that their secret was that they, at times, would sleep in 
> crystal lined caves and that this would rejuvenate their bodies, 
> bringing healing and new growth. *
>
> *I propose that, in the very near future, I will be able to test this 
> idea with the fiber crystal that I am making in my lab in Albuquerque. 
> Soon, I hope to be able to grow my fiber crystals long enough, and in 
> large enough quantities, that we will be able to spin these crystals 
> into yarn. Once spun into yarn, single crystal fiber cloth could be 
> woven to make crystal cloth head and wristbands, hats, and meditation 
> shawls. You could even stuff your mattress with crystal fiber, or 
> cover your bedroom wall with crystal fiber cloth wallpaper. This 
> should stimulate creativity, imagination, healing and regeneration. *
>
> *Now this next idea may sound way out, but, I believe that it will be 
> possible to make room temperature superconductors of crystal fiber. If 
> this becomes possible, we are talking about levitation, and possibly 
> even a magic carpet. *
>
> *So, the door is wide open with the possibilities of working with 
> SuperLight energies, through the use of single crystal fibers. I 
> believe these need to be high purity crystal fibers, in order to have 
> the coherence necessary to resonate with SuperLight. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT AND GRAVITY*
>
> *Gravity is not an intrinsic property of matter 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/matter.htm>, neither is inertia 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/inertia.htm>. These secondary 
> forces are both formed by the reaction of matter to the dynamic field 
> of SuperLight. Gravity is not an attraction! It is the result of a 
> universal pressure, exerted by **SuperLight as it rains in from 
> infinity, from all directions, onto every object**.   Materials are 
> not 100% transparent to SuperLight. I estimate, perhaps about 
> 99.99999999% transparent. As a consequence, all material domains, all 
> "matter", experiences an acceleration caused by SuperLight. Every 
> "particle" is affected by a slight drag, or pressure differential, as 
> SuperLight travels past and through them. *
>
> *Quantum Particle Interactions, come into play as SuperLight joins in, 
> or exits the activities of the particle domain. Field effects come 
> into play, as the SuperLight Entity travels through the Atomic 
> Atmosphere producing drag. Drag turbulence and particle pressures 
> combine to produce the accelerational force we know as gravity. *
>
> *This acceleration is of little consequence when a single object is in 
> space, at a very great distance from other objects, since the force 
> vectors cancel out. However, when a second object comes close to the 
> first object, then, the two objects shield each other from the full 
> power of SuperLight pressure on the opposite sides of the objects 
> facing each other. As a result of this, the objects experience a net 
> accelerational force toward each other, which is directly proportional 
> to their mass. Mass that produces the mutual shielding that each 
> object experiences. Thus, falsely, each object is said to be attracted 
> to each other !   In reality, they are being pushed together by the 
> net differential force of SuperLight pressure which results from the 
> slight absorption of SuperLight as it passes through these objects. 
> This, according to my theory, is what creates gravity. It is a push 
> exerted by SuperLight, on objects shielding each other, from a portion 
> of the SuperLight radiation. *
>
> *Gravity then becomes the "Weak Force", from the effects of porous 
> matter. An atom of matter is about 10^18 parts void for each part of 
> solid matter. The wavelength of SuperLight is much smaller than the 
> typical atomic dimension. Thus, most of SuperLight passes through the 
> atomic structure unopposed. However, when SuperLight contacts the 
> nucleus or electrons it produces the force that holds the electrons in 
> orbit, and the nucleus together. It is the nuclear glue. This gives 
> matter its chemical properties. Thus, gravity is the weak force since 
> only a very small amount of SuperLight interacts with matter on the 
> atomic scale. An example that will give you some idea as to how porous 
> solid matter is, as follows: Let us expand the nucleus of an atom to 
> the size of a golf ball, then the electrons in orbit about this 
> nucleus would be about the size of a pea. Now when this pea makes its 
> orbit about the golf ball its orbit is not a few feet or even a few 
> yards in diameter, its orbit is about 2 miles in diameter. Matter is 
> mostly composed of void or space and the energy rays of SuperLight, 
> whose wavelength is many times smaller than the diameter of the 
> electron, will to a large extent miss the particle regions, as it 
> rains through the atomic region. Only a small amount of SuperLight 
> interacts with the nucleus and electrons while the majority will pass 
> right through the region. *
>
> *NUCLEAR FORCE***
>
> *The structure of the nucleus is extremely dense, when compared to 
> that of the atom as a whole. The particles of matter in the nucleus 
> are much closer to each other, than those in the electron. The nucleus 
> is probably in the order of 10^28 more dense. Thus, the force that 
> holds the nucleus together, must be very strong. *
>
> *In reality, it is still the effects of SuperLight pushing and 
> interacting, that holds the components of nucleus together. These 
> stronger interactions on the nucleus, are a result of its increased 
> relative density and ability to shield SuperLight. It is the density 
> and geometry of matter that changes the forces we see. Thus, from One 
> Source, comes the One Force, that divides and manifests itself in so 
> many interesting ways. *
>
> *The relative packing symmetry is very critical in the nucleus and 
> this accounts for the relative stability of various nuclei. A less 
> symmetrical structure, results in radioactivity and an unstable 
> nucleus. In this way, SuperLight helps to explain radioactivity. *
>
> *SUPERLIGHT IS THE SINGULARITY***
>
> *(The University Field or Energy Source) *
>
> *Einstein spent the last half of his life in search of a unifying 
> field theory that would unite all forces into one. I believe that with 
> SuperLight, a theory can be developed to explain this idea. 
> SuperLight; one force, once source. The concept I've developed is new, 
> and all aspects have not yet been considered, but what has been 
> covered appears to fit quite well with our current understanding of 
> reality. *
>
> *I propose that SuperLight energy is the singularity or universal 
> energy force in all nature and that its interaction with various forms 
> of matter and energy produce all other forces in the Universe. 
> Specific atomic structures and sub-atomic structures are resonant to 
> and interact with some aspects of SuperLight as it passes through them 
> and our bodies. The energy that is absorbed is converted into the 
> electrical, magnetic, nuclear and gravitational forces producing our 
> vital life force. This can explain all the forces of nature and life 
> energies. *
>
> *It is the geometry and density of matter that explains the different 
> forms and intensity of the forces that are produced. *
>
> *FUTURE ENERGY SOURCE***
>
> *As greater understanding of what types of devices 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/tommy/td.htm> can attune to 
> SuperLight, I believe that it will be possible to capture this energy, 
> collect it, and measure it. At first only small assemblies will be 
> made for healing and regeneration, (only small amounts are needed) 
> scientific analysis, proof of principle and localized experiments. In 
> the future, I envision massive devices to be used as direct energy 
> converters. This development will have a significant effect on 
> reducing world pollution associated with most other energy producing 
> systems such as nuclear and fossil fuels. *
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *SUMMARY***
>
> *There is parity in the universe, therefore light has two forms: *
>
> *ELECRTO–MAGNETIC — electric light traveling at C.   (10^10 meters per 
> sec.) *
>
> *MAGNETO–ELECTRIC — magnetic light traveling at C squared. *
>
> *These lights are responsible for all created matter, all forces, and 
> life itself. As a result of this theory , I make the following 
> statements; *
>
> *LIFE HEALING AND SPIRITUALITY***
>
> *1. Vital life force energies come from SuperLight reacting with 
> coherent structures in the body. *
>
> *2. Organs and chakras produce energy vortexes from the interaction 
> with SuperLight. *
>
> *3. Aging comes from loss of coherence in the body. *
>
> *4. Healing and regeneration will be possible, by exposure to higher 
> concentrations of SuperLight. *
>
> *5.All psychic phenomena takes place on the SuperLight wave bands. *
>
> *Super Light as it Affects Physics and Astronomy***
>
> *1. It proposes a three dimensional dynamic ether that reacts with all 
> matter and energy causing all forces. *
>
> *2. Gravity is not and intrinsic property of matter, but only a 
> reaction to an external force. (e.g. SuperLight) *
>
> *3. Inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, but only it's 
> reaction to acceleration through the ether of SuperLight's dynamic 
> field. *
>
> *4. It eliminates the problem of action at a distance. *
>
> *5. It eliminates the need for dark matter, and solves Dr. Rubins 
> problem of the outer stars in galaxies "traveling too fast". (There is 
> a slight drag causing the stars to fall slowly into the center of the 
> galaxy.) *
>
> *6. Also, the gravity constant is not constant, but becomes less as 
> one approaches black holes, due to the reduction effect of SuperLight 
> radiating out of the black hole. *
>
> *7. This also means that the gravity constant becomes significantly 
> less at the edge of the Universe. *
>
> *8. It also allows black holes to reach an equilibrium state, — matter 
> in SuperLight out — thus preventing one black hole from becoming 
> massive and gobbling up the whole universe. *
>
> *9. It explains what neutrinos are: they are SuperLight. *
>
> *10. It allows many new scenarios for the Big Bang and creation 
> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/bigbang.htm>. For example: Since 
> gravity and inertia are the result of matter reacting with SuperLight, 
> which did not exist prior to the big bang, or in early times, then, 
> the Big Bang could have been a Little Bang (or a big breath)because 
> any force would cause and infinite acceleration, since there was 
> nothing to hold matter back. *
>
> *SuperLight And Space Travel***
>
> *Communication, on the SuperLight wave bands, will permit extreme 
> distant communication in space in much shorter times. (e.g. 100,000 
> light years in 3 to 4 minutes.) *
>
> *It eliminates the need to take fuel, when you travel in space, thus 
> permitting real deep space travel. *
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **
>
> *Harnessing SuperLight Will Give Us An
> Infinite Supply of Non-Polluting Energy ***
>
>
>
> Your question on the Ion Wind fire fighting,  You have to have a very 
> high volume capacity HVDC (negative)  ion generator like the Felici 
> 3,000 watt electrostatic generator.  When I was working with Leonard 
> Dorsett and his Super Steam Generator that put out CO2, Nitrogen and 
> water vapor, planned to incorporate the HVDC (negative) ion 
> genweration to enhance its proven fire fighting capability!  (Super 
> Steam Presentation & Workshop at Tesla Conference 1995) see YouTube.
>
>
> On 7/25/2018 8:52 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> Great stuff on the VTA.  Always found it suspicious that after the 
>> Scientific American released the time reversed light article that all 
>> slid into obscurity.  We should be using these mirrors for satellite 
>> communications and all sorts of other applications but no.  Seems 
>> that maybe wireless power is in the same boat as it should have been 
>> widely applied by now with all the carbide fets designed just for 
>> this purpose, could it be that loose coupling an off the shelf 
>> wireless power device might give away the candy store...
>>
>> I am very interested in the device you posted about for fire 
>> control.  Unfortunately your posts are not parsable by subject 
>> matter.  Do you think this application has potential for forest fires 
>> and if so what is required to build a prototype?  From the brief 
>> description available it appeared to be some sort of air pump 
>> connected to a neg ion source.  Do you know the size of the generator 
>> used for fuel fires you mentioned?  Is just a series of 15 kv diode 
>> rectified flybacks sufficient or are more relativistic voltages 
>> employed/required?   Interesting I have not found patent of Teslas 
>> magnetic spark gap but the description and drawing are available in 
>> The inventions, researches and writings of Nikola Tesla by Thomas 
>> Commeford Martin.  There also seemed to be magnetic vacuum rectifiers 
>> build for a short spell but have not found much more about these 
>> interesting claimed devices that the occasional mutterings.
>>
>> I know you also mentioned that some Tesla coils can produce this 
>> effect so is this a matter of timing of a rectified primary?  Need to 
>> get my thyratron up and online, so many chores and so much to build.
>>
>>
>> On 7/23/2018 12:48 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>> Date: 	Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:08:28 -0500
>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>> To: 	Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Bert Pool 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> CC: 	Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain 
>>> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Lane 
>>> Wootan <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Phil 
>>> Rembold <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Toby! Back in the early 80s, I was designing some PM motors and 
>>> became friends with the Production Manager at General Magnetics 
>>> (Southland Corp) in Dallas for they manufactured speaker magnets of 
>>> all size and shapes. My frequent visits with him, I saw the mixing, 
>>> molding, firing and magnetizing of the then Barium Ferite magnets. 
>>> EPA mandated the end of the use of barium in the manufacturing 
>>> process with a strontium substitute. The barium magnets became 
>>> available from Brazil and China. Back when I visited with Don Martin 
>>> and got the dimensions of Sparky's magnets  I found them at Edmund 
>>> Scientific so bought the exact same Sweet magnets. I was scrapping 
>>> sown all the main frame (IBM) computers in the DFW area and  found 
>>> that the early versions of the big hard drives had the barium 
>>> magnets which Joel and I used in the MRA (Mini Sweet).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The MRA magnets were barium ferrite taken from these linear servos 
>>> in the read write heads.
>>>
>>> After talking to Bearden regarding the conversion of cold electrical 
>>> output making a self runner (Sweet said not possible) I realized 
>>> that much more had to be learned about this aspect of research. I 
>>> know you were involved to some extent.
>>>
>>> See: Sweet attachments in his own words!
>>>
>>> Before I got all bogged down with  my Hydrogen Production Process 
>>> and building Proof of concept prototypes for GAZPROM, Russia, I had 
>>> formulated a real neat Barium, Titanium dioxide, Ferrite magnet to 
>>> be made by a Chinese vendor. I never got the prototype magnets built.
>>> Over the years with contact with Gunderson, Sweet VTA Yahoo site, I 
>>> accumulated practically all there is to know about the Sweet 
>>> Project. I guess Bearden's Final, Final, Final Secret is still yet 
>>> to be realized!  Lol
>>> Norm
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/23/2018 8:15 AM, Toby Grotz wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Lots of stuff here.  I have been busy so need to back and review all.
>>>>
>>>> I did see a reference to barium ferrite.  Sparky sweet said the 
>>>> magnets he used had to be barium ferrite.  Most ceramic magnets of 
>>>> the size he was using are strontium ferrite.  To tell the 
>>>> difference I used, per his instructions, an ohm meter.  One 
>>>> conducts, the other doesn’t.  I forget which way it is.  Somewhere 
>>>> in my collection of boxes I think I have one of his magnets.  I’m 
>>>> still unpackingand organizing  after many, many moves so it will be 
>>>> awhile before I find it.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, attached is Sweet circuit and plot from a magnet he had used.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Toby
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 22, 2018, at 7:20 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>> Subject: 	Re: [EVGRAY] The Energy in Negative charge (What is Heat?)
>>>>> Date: 	Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:39:51 -0700
>>>>> From: 	[email protected][EVGRAY]<[email protected]>
>>>>> Reply-To: 	[email protected]
>>>>> To: 	[email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting theory Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sure you have thought far more about Hydrogen than most other 
>>>>> people, I read your patent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Protium and molecular, not sure where the electron difference is 
>>>>> but there seems to be the potential of a hole difference or at 
>>>>> least a neutron missing.  Very interesting what happens with a 
>>>>> Coleman battery in that it emits neutrons. As no one really seems 
>>>>> to know what a hole is, some say it's protons but I think proton 
>>>>> electricity is a different animal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tesla always said it was a gas and lighter than Hydrogen so maybe 
>>>>> the mono form is one of the light Aether gasses since it has no 
>>>>> neutron and would only need a proton to gather an electron. If it 
>>>>> shows up from out of nowhere that is a key to dimensional tuning.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's either coming from the (ZP) aether well or earth well so we 
>>>>> do agree on the origin. Also have a theory about rain forming in a 
>>>>> similar way.  When we have these weather systems starting on the 
>>>>> west cost and dumping billions of gallons all across the country 
>>>>> more than the clouds could ever hold.  As the high and lower 
>>>>> clouds commingle I thing they convert nitrogen to hydrogen and oxygen.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I have seen an influence machine work properly 
>>>>> without a ground connection so they are in fact pumps.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK I have been wondering about all the todo of rectifying and then 
>>>>> fractioning the HV to a coil vs straight up static charge from a 
>>>>> serious influence machine for the neutral spike.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Felici device sounds like something to build someday.  Also 
>>>>> interesting what NASA is doing with the helium to hold H in the 
>>>>> Protium state.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Lyne had the monoatomic furnace which is a great idea too.  I 
>>>>> think there are some deep truths in William Lynes writings even if 
>>>>> some of the whys and wherefores may be misinterpreted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dielectric stress in piezo crytals is another field I intend to 
>>>>> pursue as far as attempting electrets and anisotropic alignments 
>>>>> and restructuring.   I think Barrium Ferrite might be 
>>>>> piezoelectric, don't recall right now, but either way it seems to 
>>>>> be a very good insulator and something that can fraction electrons 
>>>>> from the B field.  I imagine you played with this stuff quite a 
>>>>> bit during your MRA design and likely noticed some interesting 
>>>>> aspects of the material.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a guy who was using magnetic tape rings and tape heads 
>>>>> for a OU lenz free generator.   He had a single sine wave freq and 
>>>>> claimed he could loop generating electricity in this way as the 
>>>>> tape passing by the heads each putting out about 9 volts did not 
>>>>> seem to get loaded down.  Probably just another tuned high 
>>>>> impedance system.  Find it interesting as mag tape is mostly 
>>>>> barium ferrite particles.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2018 10:50 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember Mick, You have been saying Differential?  Well, here is 
>>>>>> what is happening which agrees with Hal Puthoff paper on the 
>>>>>> spontaneous formation of hydrogen from space background from free 
>>>>>> protons.  Please reviewIrving Langmuir 
>>>>>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Langmuir>  Atomic 
>>>>>> Hydrogen.  Here is my theory as to how the 3000watts of HVDC is 
>>>>>> created in a 30 atm. atmosphere of .9999 pure hydrogen gas. In 
>>>>>> the Lanfmuir torch a high voltage charge breaks the H2 bond 
>>>>>> creating monatomic hydrogen (atoms).  Same with the Felici 
>>>>>> Generator, the operating gas is Atomic Hydrogen. According to Hal 
>>>>>> Puthoff, if a hydrogen atom looses an electron it is immediately 
>>>>>> replenished by the Zero Point space background. The Felici 
>>>>>> Generator is a zero Point Energy Generator or PUMP.  I had an 
>>>>>> interesting discussion with Ken (RIP) Shoulders at a New Energy 
>>>>>> Symposium in Denver. I asked him what type of power supply he 
>>>>>> used in charging his HVDC capacitor banks for the Charged Cluster 
>>>>>> experiments. His reply was an Electrostatic Influence Machine 
>>>>>> (Holtz Machine). He  said that if you apply a potential of lets 
>>>>>> say 100,000 Volts across a capacitor it will charge because you 
>>>>>> have stressed the dielectric (dielectric displacement). 
>>>>>> Interesting answer to say the least.  The charged capacitors will 
>>>>>> do work. Same with the Felici Generator for the 3,000 watt output 
>>>>>> will do work drawing the energy from the space background. See!  
>>>>>> Mick, I had to answer my own question for nobody thinks about the 
>>>>>> perplexing problems.  Ha! Ha!     Norm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja02208a003
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 11:13 AM, [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, well, well... certainly not from inside the device!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 8:12 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.webring.org/l/rd?ring=teslaring;id=1;url=http%3A%2F%2Fu2%2Elege%2Enet%2Fnewebmasters%2Ecom__freeenergy%2Fexternal_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet%2Ecom%2Fhighvoltage%2FHVgenerator%2FHVgenerator%2Ehtm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Speaking of Hydrogen, gas with one proton and one electron / 
>>>>>>>> atom, where does the electrons come from in the Felici HV 
>>>>>>>> Electrostatic Generator??  I have issued this challenge before 
>>>>>>>> with no comments.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2018 9:37 AM, Norman [email protected][EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Going back to a subject not fully understood. What is Heat?    
>>>>>>>>> Which has more energy, Holes or Electrons? Hot surface = holes 
>>>>>>>>> due to missing electrons vs cold surface= packing of electrons 
>>>>>>>>> until all holes are filled (absolute zero conditions) BTW, 
>>>>>>>>> absolute zero conditions, there is no Browning Motion for 
>>>>>>>>> there are no holes for electrons to move in the atomic 
>>>>>>>>> lattice. See:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199606/achieve.cfm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra 
>>>>>>>>> energy not just from the additional in the coil collapse but 
>>>>>>>>> from the neutral spike Norm is on to.  It is elusive because 
>>>>>>>>> it requires a solid negative pulse for that huge power return 
>>>>>>>>> strike just like lighting.  With positive lightening there is 
>>>>>>>>> no return strike.  The return mucks up everything silicon so 
>>>>>>>>> no wonder it has been completely engineered around.  It's 
>>>>>>>>> difficult to get solid negative with high voltage as the 
>>>>>>>>> oscillations provide as you know the counter field so the 
>>>>>>>>> proper neg polarity to input of a coil doesn't cut it but is a 
>>>>>>>>> good start.  This is why Tesla was using magnetic to fraction 
>>>>>>>>> out the negative traveling wave which is what he referred to 
>>>>>>>>> as radiant.  I am sure certain materials also contribute to a 
>>>>>>>>> more pure charge one way or the other just like with static 
>>>>>>>>> charges.  We just have to learn to use the proper materials in 
>>>>>>>>> our coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/ 
>>>>>>>>> <http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you think about this for a moment, I believe you will 
>>>>>>>>> understand the concentration of negative charge (cold) 
>>>>>>>>> creating the huge amounts of ice & hail in the negative 
>>>>>>>>> thunderstorm. Moray is interested in the positive lighting 
>>>>>>>>> producing the sprite events over the storms as photographed by 
>>>>>>>>> the ISIS Space Station. (interaction of the Hot positive 
>>>>>>>>> charge with the Cold Negative ionosphere.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *What is Heat ?*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   By
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Norman L. Wootan*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Battle Creek Farms*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *22825 FM709N*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Hubbard, TX 76648*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *(214)907-0010
>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *[email protected]*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist,
>>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool
>>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is
>>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super 
>>>>>>>>> Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea 
>>>>>>>>> of using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super 
>>>>>>>>> conductive Tesla Coil primary. Tesla understood the power of a 
>>>>>>>>> "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very high order! 
>>>>>>>>> "Hmmmmn"!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> 
>