Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.

7 messages · 2017-12-27T20:12:04+00:00 → 2017-12-30T04:43:10+00:00
Hi Sven,

The NASA SLS rocket will be bigger than the Saturn V Moon rockets. It will be able to make a manned flight to Mars and back again by help from a Moon flyby using the gravity of the Moon as a slingshot. The Moon is also used to brake the rocket during reentry.

This will be the first time for a manned trip beyond the Moon. At least for an official trip that far. This is planned for the coming year. Old article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3664527/Watch-Nasa-test-biggest-rocket-SLS-booster-one-day-man-Mars-passes-final-firing-test.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3664527/Watch-Nasa-test-biggest-rocket-SLS-booster-one-day-man-Mars-passes-final-firing-test.html

When reading ET info they tell that to be able to survive such a trip the space ship must carry its own aether or stay in the aether of our planet like when only going to the Moon. There can be translation problems in transferring technical info from advanced civilizations though. Rockets aren't good for long distance. They only accelerate for short periods of time (minutes) and achieve low speed when comparing the distances in space. A motor that takes energy from the ambient is needed. Just like ships long ago traveled around the Earth using wind from the ambient. That technology just isn't official yet. To reach the speed of light requires transforming all mass of the object into propulsion. To go beyond the speed of light requires still more energy. This has to be taken along the trip like the old sail ships did by using wind power. That's the way the ETs are visiting us. Manipulating gravity is one way of doing propulsion through space. Gravity is a deduced effect of electromagnetism according to several sources (W.B. Smith, W.J. Hooper, Daniel Fry etc.).

Regards
Ole

---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :

 

 Hello Warren, there is no development in space travel the space shuttle is already ancient and retired. Can the USA still fly into space on its own? You can sell anything, I think if it were possible, there would be a lot of people who would pay a lot of money. I once read that survival outside the radiation protection belt of the earth is not so easy. That's why all spaceflight missions are within this protective belt. There used to be no more propaganda race between the US and the USSR. The Sputnik should also be a lie. But I'm not too busy with it. As comparison. Somebody climbed Mount Everest at some point and that's not easy, but more and more people are doing it. Best regards Sven
 

 Von Samsung Mobile gesendet



-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Warren Keillor schoonersolsticemoon@... [EVGRAY]" 
Datum:27.12.2017 19:36 (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy. 

   Sven
 It cost a lot of money to fly to the moon.
 The military industrial complex got redirected for a short time doing a lot of research and development, but not making their normal huge profits.
 They failed to come home with bags of gold , or even green cheese, so the shareholders pushed for a good old fashioned war in Vietnam where the companies produce like crazy, war munitions, and then they blow them all up in some distant place making giant profits from a gullible public. Well, not quite so gullible, that we didn't complain a bit.
 Oh, they landed on the moon all right, and drove an electric dune buggy around.
 Not exactly the right images for selling gas, for gas guzzling Chevrolets, and Pontiacs, or those Shelby Mustangs.
 The public's imagination was being spun away from the moon at full speed, because it was not good for business.
 The business of the military industrialists was not compatible with multi national space efforts.
 Cheers Warren

 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android
 
 On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18 PM, 'Sven Friedrich' s.friedrich@... [EVGRAY]
 <[email protected]> wrote:
 
   
 Hi Ole,
 
 It sounds very plausible but I do not know how to transfer it to the transverter. Because there I excite the resonant circuit of the others with one coil, there will not flow the same current through both coils.
 
 Hector makes it easier, he says Radio Frequency = Radiant Energy. And VAR is a very low frequency radio wave trapped in the LC of a transformer and capacitor. That's how I always see it.
 
 I always ask myself or have not found anything yet. The various filters such as high pass and low pass as LC block only the interfering frequencies or absorb their energy and convert them into the frequency of the filter's passage?!?.
 
 This with ET gets too esoteric, although I'm sure there is life on this planet, why should not there be life elsewhere? Only the distances are insurmountable for my understanding. I am also someone who is firmly convinced that no one was yet on the moon, if it really was like that someone would have been flying up again in the last 40 years.
 
 Best regards
 
 Sven   Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017 um 16:13 Uhr
 Von: "onielsen@... [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
 An: [email protected]
 Betreff: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
   Hi Sven,
 
 The magnetic field of a coil is a coherent field. Each turn or fraction of a turn sends out part of the magnetic field. By doubling the number of turns while having the same current through them quadruples the stored energy of the magnetic field. This is coherence. When doubling the number of turns by just having two separate coils with the same current going through them only doubles the energy stored. This is in a way more like superposition where at half the time the waves are added (quadrupling the energy) while the remaining time the field cancels out giving no stored energy. I consider a magnetic field as made up of shock waves emitted from moving charges. When each little wave front becomes coherent they form a magnetic field. For figures see 'Matter Is Made Of Waves'
 http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/index.htm http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/index.htm
 
 Go to chapter 21 on magnetic fields.
 
 
 This is the first figure showing the interference pattern of two point emitters. This figure isn't shown as its name is in capital letters while the address linking to it use lower case letters. The figures are in this folder: http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/ http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/
 
 
 This is the fourth figure that is also missing on the page. Here are three point emitters to make up the magnetic field lines. The wavelengths and distances must match to make the field pattern. This is where coherence comes into play. Random emitted waves doesn't form magnetic fields.
 
 "Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?"
 No idea. It was intended for a force field and to learn some new physics unknown to mankind. The ETs don't seem to agree on how much it's allowed to interfere with our world. It can have big consequences for them if they're from a future timeline which it seems that the ones interviewed in this book are. The ET crew that visited the Mexican professor aren't allowed to visit us any more because of interference by preventing the Russian submarine Kursk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kursk_submarine_disaster from a nuclear explosion that could have stopped the nuclear age. At least that's what they tell in the book.
 
 Regards
 Ole
   
 
 ---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
   Hello Ole,
 
 the coherent fields in simple words in words and pictures. Could you try it? Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?
 
 best regards
 
 Sven
Hello Warren, there is no development in space travel the space shuttle is already ancient and retired. Can the USA still fly into space on its own? You can sell anything, I think if it were possible, there would be a lot of people who would pay a lot of money. I once read that survival outside the radiation protection belt of the earth is not so easy. That's why all spaceflight missions are within this protective belt. There used to be no more propaganda race between the US and the USSR. The Sputnik should also be a lie. But I'm not too busy with it. As comparison. Somebody climbed Mount Everest at some point and that's not easy, but more and more people are doing it. Best regards Sven

Von Samsung Mobile gesendet

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Warren Keillor [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]> 
Datum:27.12.2017  19:36  (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy. 

Sven

It cost a lot of money to fly to the moon.
The military industrial complex got redirected for a short time doing a lot of research and development, but not making their normal huge profits.
They failed to come home with bags of gold , or even green cheese, so the shareholders pushed for a good old fashioned war in Vietnam where the companies produce like crazy, war munitions, and then they blow them all up in some distant place making giant profits from a gullible public. Well, not quite so gullible, that we didn't complain a bit.
Oh, they landed on the moon all right, and drove an electric dune buggy around.
Not exactly the right images for selling gas, for gas guzzling Chevrolets, and Pontiacs, or those Shelby Mustangs.
The public's imagination was being spun away from the moon at full speed, because it was not good for business.
The business of the military industrialists was not compatible with multi national space efforts.
Cheers Warren

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18 PM, 'Sven Friedrich' [email protected] [EVGRAY]
<[email protected]> wrote:
 
Hi Ole,

It sounds very plausible but I do not know how to transfer it to the transverter. Because there I excite the resonant circuit of the others with one coil, there will not flow the same current through both coils.

Hector makes it easier, he says Radio Frequency = Radiant Energy. And VAR is a very low frequency radio wave trapped in the LC of a transformer and capacitor. That's how I always see it.

I always ask myself or have not found anything yet. The various filters such as high pass and low pass as LC block only the interfering frequencies or absorb their energy and convert them into the frequency of the filter's passage?!?.

This with ET gets too esoteric, although I'm sure there is life on this planet, why should not there be life elsewhere? Only the distances are insurmountable for my understanding. I am also someone who is firmly convinced that no one was yet on the moon, if it really was like that someone would have been flying up again in the last 40 years.

Best regards

Sven
 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017 um 16:13 Uhr
Von: "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
 
Hi Sven,

The magnetic field of a coil is a coherent field. Each turn or fraction of a turn sends out part of the magnetic field. By doubling the number of turns while having the same current through them quadruples the stored energy of the magnetic field. This is coherence. When doubling the number of turns by just having two separate coils with the same current going through them only doubles the energy stored. This is in a way more like superposition where at half the time the waves are added (quadrupling the energy) while the remaining time the field cancels out giving no stored energy. I consider a magnetic field as made up of shock waves emitted from moving charges. When each little wave front becomes coherent they form a magnetic field. For figures see 'Matter Is Made Of Waves'

http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/index.htm


Go to chapter 21 on magnetic fields.


This is the first figure showing the interference pattern of two point emitters. This figure isn't shown as its name is in capital letters while the address linking to it use lower case letters. The figures are in this folder: http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/


This is the fourth figure that is also missing on the page. Here are three point emitters to make up the magnetic field lines. The wavelengths and distances must match to make the field pattern. This is where coherence comes into play. Random emitted waves doesn't form magnetic fields.

"Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?"
No idea. It was intended for a force field and to learn some new physics unknown to mankind. The ETs don't seem to agree on how much it's allowed to interfere with our world. It can have big consequences for them if they're from a future timeline which it seems that the ones interviewed in this book are. The ET crew that visited the Mexican professor aren't allowed to visit us any more because of interference by preventing the Russian submarine Kursk from a nuclear explosion that could have stopped the nuclear age. At least that's what they tell in the book.

Regards
Ole
 


---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
 
Hello Ole,

the coherent fields in simple words in words and pictures. Could you try it? Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?

best regards

Sven

[3/7] Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.

2017-12-27T22:11:28+00:00 · james glinski <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CA+uJ=nf+oMPkHeAcq_ZKRGHRfWL5w4C3dYVKe70QRZG0gzCGhA@mail.gmail.com>
Unless they come up with a radiation shield it's a waste of time and money
there dead out in space and Mars .the Van Allen belt is real bad .hi speed
protons .it's like walking through a cyclotron .
On Dec 27, 2017 2:12 PM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> The NASA SLS rocket will be bigger than the Saturn V Moon rockets. It will
> be able to make a manned flight to Mars and back again by help from a Moon
> flyby using the gravity of the Moon as a slingshot. The Moon is also used
> to brake the rocket during reentry.
>
> This will be the first time for a manned trip beyond the Moon. At least
> for an official trip that far. This is planned for the coming year. Old
> article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3664527/
> Watch-Nasa-test-biggest-rocket-SLS-booster-one-day-
> man-Mars-passes-final-firing-test.html
>
> When reading ET info they tell that to be able to survive such a trip the
> space ship must carry its own aether or stay in the aether of our planet
> like when only going to the Moon. There can be translation problems in
> transferring technical info from advanced civilizations though. Rockets
> aren't good for long distance. They only accelerate for short periods of
> time (minutes) and achieve low speed when comparing the distances in space.
> A motor that takes energy from the ambient is needed. Just like ships long
> ago traveled around the Earth using wind from the ambient. That technology
> just isn't official yet. To reach the speed of light requires transforming
> all mass of the object into propulsion. To go beyond the speed of light
> requires still more energy. This has to be taken along the trip like the
> old sail ships did by using wind power. That's the way the ETs are visiting
> us. Manipulating gravity is one way of doing propulsion through space.
> Gravity is a deduced effect of electromagnetism according to several
> sources (W.B. Smith, W.J. Hooper, Daniel Fry etc.).
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
> ---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
>
>
> Hello Warren, there is no development in space travel the space shuttle is
> already ancient and retired. Can the USA still fly into space on its own?
> You can sell anything, I think if it were possible, there would be a lot of
> people who would pay a lot of money. I once read that survival outside the
> radiation protection belt of the earth is not so easy. That's why all
> spaceflight missions are within this protective belt. There used to be no
> more propaganda race between the US and the USSR. The Sputnik should also
> be a lie. But I'm not too busy with it. As comparison. Somebody climbed
> Mount Everest at some point and that's not easy, but more and more people
> are doing it. Best regards Sven
>
> Von Samsung Mobile gesendet
>
>
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: "Warren Keillor schoonersolsticemoon@... [EVGRAY]"
> Datum:27.12.2017 19:36 (GMT+01:00)
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
>
>
>
> Sven
> It cost a lot of money to fly to the moon.
> The military industrial complex got redirected for a short time doing a
> lot of research and development, but not making their normal huge profits.
> They failed to come home with bags of gold , or even green cheese, so the
> shareholders pushed for a good old fashioned war in Vietnam where the
> companies produce like crazy, war munitions, and then they blow them all up
> in some distant place making giant profits from a gullible public. Well,
> not quite so gullible, that we didn't complain a bit.
> Oh, they landed on the moon all right, and drove an electric dune buggy
> around.
> Not exactly the right images for selling gas, for gas guzzling Chevrolets,
> and Pontiacs, or those Shelby Mustangs.
> The public's imagination was being spun away from the moon at full speed,
> because it was not good for business.
> The business of the military industrialists was not compatible with multi
> national space efforts.
> Cheers Warren
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18 PM, 'Sven Friedrich' s.friedrich@...
> [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Ole,
>
> It sounds very plausible but I do not know how to transfer it to the
> transverter. Because there I excite the resonant circuit of the others
> with one coil, there will not flow the same current through both coils.
>
> Hector makes it easier, he says Radio Frequency = Radiant Energy. And VAR
> is a very low frequency radio wave trapped in the LC of a transformer and
> capacitor. That's how I always see it.
>
> I always ask myself or have not found anything yet. The various filters
> such as high pass and low pass as LC block only the interfering frequencies
> or absorb their energy and convert them into the frequency of the filter's
> passage?!?.
>
> This with ET gets too esoteric, although I'm sure there is life on this
> planet, why should not there be life elsewhere? Only the distances are
> insurmountable for my understanding. I am also someone who is firmly
> convinced that no one was yet on the moon, if it really was like that
> someone would have been flying up again in the last 40 years.
>
> Best regards
>
> Sven
>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017 um 16:13 Uhr
> *Von:* "onielsen@... [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
> *An:* [email protected]
> *Betreff:* Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> The magnetic field of a coil is a coherent field. Each turn or fraction of
> a turn sends out part of the magnetic field. By doubling the number of
> turns while having the same current through them quadruples the stored
> energy of the magnetic field. This is coherence. When doubling the number
> of turns by just having two separate coils with the same current going
> through them only doubles the energy stored. This is in a way more like
> superposition where at half the time the waves are added (quadrupling the
> energy) while the remaining time the field cancels out giving no stored
> energy. I consider a magnetic field as made up of shock waves emitted from
> moving charges. When each little wave front becomes coherent they form a
> magnetic field. For figures see 'Matter Is Made Of Waves'
>
> http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/index.htm
>
> Go to chapter 21 on magnetic fields.
>
> [image:
> http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/PROTON10.GIF]
> This is the first figure showing the interference pattern of two point
> emitters. This figure isn't shown as its name is in capital letters while
> the address linking to it use lower case letters. The figures are in this
> folder: http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/
>
> [image:
> http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/MAGNET15.JPG]
> This is the fourth figure that is also missing on the page. Here are three
> point emitters to make up the magnetic field lines. The wavelengths and
> distances must match to make the field pattern. This is where coherence
> comes into play. Random emitted waves doesn't form magnetic fields.
>
> "Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with
> each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy
> from them?"
> No idea. It was intended for a force field and to learn some new physics
> unknown to mankind. The ETs don't seem to agree on how much it's allowed to
> interfere with our world. It can have big consequences for them if they're
> from a future timeline which it seems that the ones interviewed in this
> book are. The ET crew that visited the Mexican professor aren't allowed to
> visit us any more because of interference by preventing the Russian
> submarine Kursk <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kursk_submarine_disaster>
> from a nuclear explosion that could have stopped the nuclear age. At least
> that's what they tell in the book.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
>
> Hello Ole,
>
> the coherent fields in simple words in words and pictures. Could you try
> it? Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact
> with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw
> energy from them?
>
> best regards
>
> Sven
>
>
>
> 
>
Sven,
Here is a video showing why we never went to the moon.George
NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

  
|  
|   
|   
|   |    |

   |

  |
|  
|    |  
NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON
 Unlike all of the other proof over the years about the moon landing hoax, this video will examine how NASA thems...  |   |

  |

  |

 


      From: "'S.friedrich' [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Thursday, 28 December 2017, 6:36
 Subject: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
   
    
Hello Warren, there is no development in space travel the space shuttle is already ancient and retired. Can the USA still fly into space on its own? You can sell anything, I think if it were possible, there would be a lot of people who would pay a lot of money. I once read that survival outside the radiation protection belt of the earth is not so easy. That's why all spaceflight missions are within this protective belt. There used to be no more propaganda race between the US and the USSR. The Sputnik should also be a lie. But I'm not too busy with it. As comparison. Somebody climbed Mount Everest at some point and that's not easy, but more and more people are doing it. Best regards Sven
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Warren Keillor [email protected] [EVGRAY]" 
Datum:27.12.2017 19:36 (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy. 

   SvenIt cost a lot of money to fly to the moon.The military industrial complex got redirected for a short time doing a lot of research and development, but not making their normal huge profits.They failed to come home with bags of gold , or even green cheese, so the shareholders pushed for a good old fashioned war in Vietnam where the companies produce like crazy, war munitions, and then they blow them all up in some distant place making giant profits from a gullible public. Well, not quite so gullible, that we didn't complain a bit.Oh, they landed on the moon all right, and drove an electric dune buggy around.Not exactly the right images for selling gas, for gas guzzling Chevrolets, and Pontiacs, or those Shelby Mustangs.The public's imagination was being spun away from the moon at full speed, because it was not good for business.The business of the military industrialists was not compatible with multi national space efforts.Cheers Warren

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18 PM, 'Sven Friedrich' [email protected] [EVGRAY]<[email protected]> wrote:       Hi Ole,

It sounds very plausible but I do not know how to transfer it to the transverter. Because there I excite the resonant circuit of the others with one coil, there will not flow the same current through both coils.

Hector makes it easier, he says Radio Frequency = Radiant Energy. And VAR is a very low frequency radio wave trapped in the LC of a transformer and capacitor. That's how I always see it.

I always ask myself or have not found anything yet. The various filters such as high pass and low pass as LC block only the interfering frequencies or absorb their energy and convert them into the frequency of the filter's passage?!?.

This with ET gets too esoteric, although I'm sure there is life on this planet, why should not there be life elsewhere? Only the distances are insurmountable for my understanding. I am also someone who is firmly convinced that no one was yet on the moon, if it really was like that someone would have been flying up again in the last 40 years.

Best regards

Sven Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017 um 16:13 Uhr
Von: "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy. Hi Sven,

The magnetic field of a coil is a coherent field. Each turn or fraction of a turn sends out part of the magnetic field. By doubling the number of turns while having the same current through them quadruples the stored energy of the magnetic field. This is coherence. When doubling the number of turns by just having two separate coils with the same current going through them only doubles the energy stored. This is in a way more like superposition where at half the time the waves are added (quadrupling the energy) while the remaining time the field cancels out giving no stored energy. I consider a magnetic field as made up of shock waves emitted from moving charges. When each little wave front becomes coherent they form a magnetic field. For figures see 'Matter Is Made Of Waves'http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/index.htm
Go to chapter 21 on magnetic fields.


This is the first figure showing the interference pattern of two point emitters. This figure isn't shown as its name is in capital letters while the address linking to it use lower case letters. The figures are in this folder: http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/


This is the fourth figure that is also missing on the page. Here are three point emitters to make up the magnetic field lines. The wavelengths and distances must match to make the field pattern. This is where coherence comes into play. Random emitted waves doesn't form magnetic fields.

"Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?"
No idea. It was intended for a force field and to learn some new physics unknown to mankind. The ETs don't seem to agree on how much it's allowed to interfere with our world. It can have big consequences for them if they're from a future timeline which it seems that the ones interviewed in this book are. The ET crew that visited the Mexican professor aren't allowed to visit us any more because of interference by preventing the Russian submarine Kursk from a nuclear explosion that could have stopped the nuclear age. At least that's what they tell in the book.

Regards
Ole
 

---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
 Hello Ole,

the coherent fields in simple words in words and pictures. Could you try it? Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?

best regards

Sven     
   #yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574 -- #yiv7968782574ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mkp #yiv7968782574hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mkp #yiv7968782574ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mkp .yiv7968782574ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mkp .yiv7968782574ad p {margin:0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mkp .yiv7968782574ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-sponsor #yiv7968782574ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-sponsor #yiv7968782574ygrp-lc #yiv7968782574hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-sponsor #yiv7968782574ygrp-lc .yiv7968782574ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574activity span .yiv7968782574underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 dd.yiv7968782574last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7968782574 dd.yiv7968782574last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv7968782574 dd.yiv7968782574last p span.yiv7968782574yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574file-title a, #yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574file-title a:active, #yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574file-title a:hover, #yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574photo-title a, #yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574photo-title a:active, #yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574photo-title a:hover, #yiv7968782574 div.yiv7968782574photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 div#yiv7968782574ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7968782574ygrp-msg p a span.yiv7968782574yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv7968782574 o {font-size:0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv7968782574 .yiv7968782574replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv7968782574 input, #yiv7968782574 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv7968782574 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7968782574logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-msg p#yiv7968782574attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-reco #yiv7968782574reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-sponsor #yiv7968782574ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-sponsor #yiv7968782574ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-sponsor #yiv7968782574ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv7968782574 #yiv7968782574ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv7968782574
Ole,
Maybe we never went to the Moon.
NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON

  
|  
|   
|   
|   |    |

   |

  |
|  
|    |  
NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON
 Unlike all of the other proof over the years about the moon landing hoax, this video will examine how NASA thems...  |   |

  |

  |

 
George

      From: "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Thursday, 28 December 2017, 7:12
 Subject: Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
   
    Hi Sven,

The NASA SLS rocket will be bigger than the Saturn V Moon rockets. It will be able to make a manned flight to Mars and back again by help from a Moon flyby using the gravity of the Moon as a slingshot. The Moon is also used to brake the rocket during reentry.

This will be the first time for a manned trip beyond the Moon. At least for an official trip that far. This is planned for the coming year. Old article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3664527/Watch-Nasa-test-biggest-rocket-SLS-booster-one-day-man-Mars-passes-final-firing-test.html

When reading ET info they tell that to be able to survive such a trip the space ship must carry its own aether or stay in the aether of our planet like when only going to the Moon. There can be translation problems in transferring technical info from advanced civilizations though. Rockets aren't good for long distance. They only accelerate for short periods of time (minutes) and achieve low speed when comparing the distances in space. A motor that takes energy from the ambient is needed. Just like ships long ago traveled around the Earth using wind from the ambient. That technology just isn't official yet. To reach the speed of light requires transforming all mass of the object into propulsion. To go beyond the speed of light requires still more energy. This has to be taken along the trip like the old sail ships did by using wind power. That's the way the ETs are visiting us. Manipulating gravity is one way of doing propulsion through space. Gravity is a deduced effect of electromagnetism according to several sources (W.B. Smith, W.J. Hooper, Daniel Fry etc.).

Regards
Ole

---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :


Hello Warren, there is no development in space travel the space shuttle is already ancient and retired. Can the USA still fly into space on its own? You can sell anything, I think if it were possible, there would be a lot of people who would pay a lot of money. I once read that survival outside the radiation protection belt of the earth is not so easy. That's why all spaceflight missions are within this protective belt. There used to be no more propaganda race between the US and the USSR. The Sputnik should also be a lie. But I'm not too busy with it. As comparison. Somebody climbed Mount Everest at some point and that's not easy, but more and more people are doing it. Best regards Sven
Von Samsung Mobile gesendet

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Warren Keillor schoonersolsticemoon@... [EVGRAY]" 
Datum:27.12.2017 19:36 (GMT+01:00) 
An: [email protected] 
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy. 

   SvenIt cost a lot of money to fly to the moon.The military industrial complex got redirected for a short time doing a lot of research and development, but not making their normal huge profits.They failed to come home with bags of gold , or even green cheese, so the shareholders pushed for a good old fashioned war in Vietnam where the companies produce like crazy, war munitions, and then they blow them all up in some distant place making giant profits from a gullible public. Well, not quite so gullible, that we didn't complain a bit.Oh, they landed on the moon all right, and drove an electric dune buggy around.Not exactly the right images for selling gas, for gas guzzling Chevrolets, and Pontiacs, or those Shelby Mustangs.The public's imagination was being spun away from the moon at full speed, because it was not good for business.The business of the military industrialists was not compatible with multi national space efforts.Cheers Warren

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 

 
  On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18 PM, 'Sven Friedrich' s.friedrich@... [EVGRAY]<[email protected]> wrote:       Hi Ole,

It sounds very plausible but I do not know how to transfer it to the transverter. Because there I excite the resonant circuit of the others with one coil, there will not flow the same current through both coils.

Hector makes it easier, he says Radio Frequency = Radiant Energy. And VAR is a very low frequency radio wave trapped in the LC of a transformer and capacitor. That's how I always see it.

I always ask myself or have not found anything yet. The various filters such as high pass and low pass as LC block only the interfering frequencies or absorb their energy and convert them into the frequency of the filter's passage?!?.

This with ET gets too esoteric, although I'm sure there is life on this planet, why should not there be life elsewhere? Only the distances are insurmountable for my understanding. I am also someone who is firmly convinced that no one was yet on the moon, if it really was like that someone would have been flying up again in the last 40 years.

Best regards

Sven Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017 um 16:13 Uhr
Von: "onielsen@... [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy. Hi Sven,

The magnetic field of a coil is a coherent field. Each turn or fraction of a turn sends out part of the magnetic field. By doubling the number of turns while having the same current through them quadruples the stored energy of the magnetic field. This is coherence. When doubling the number of turns by just having two separate coils with the same current going through them only doubles the energy stored. This is in a way more like superposition where at half the time the waves are added (quadrupling the energy) while the remaining time the field cancels out giving no stored energy. I consider a magnetic field as made up of shock waves emitted from moving charges. When each little wave front becomes coherent they form a magnetic field. For figures see 'Matter Is Made Of Waves'http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/index.htm
Go to chapter 21 on magnetic fields.


This is the first figure showing the interference pattern of two point emitters. This figure isn't shown as its name is in capital letters while the address linking to it use lower case letters. The figures are in this folder: http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/


This is the fourth figure that is also missing on the page. Here are three point emitters to make up the magnetic field lines. The wavelengths and distances must match to make the field pattern. This is where coherence comes into play. Random emitted waves doesn't form magnetic fields.

"Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?"
No idea. It was intended for a force field and to learn some new physics unknown to mankind. The ETs don't seem to agree on how much it's allowed to interfere with our world. It can have big consequences for them if they're from a future timeline which it seems that the ones interviewed in this book are. The ET crew that visited the Mexican professor aren't allowed to visit us any more because of interference by preventing the Russian submarine Kursk from a nuclear explosion that could have stopped the nuclear age. At least that's what they tell in the book.

Regards
Ole
 

---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
 Hello Ole,

the coherent fields in simple words in words and pictures. Could you try it? Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy from them?

best regards

Sven     

    #yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662 -- #yiv4410053662ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mkp #yiv4410053662hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mkp #yiv4410053662ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mkp .yiv4410053662ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mkp .yiv4410053662ad p {margin:0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mkp .yiv4410053662ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-sponsor #yiv4410053662ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-sponsor #yiv4410053662ygrp-lc #yiv4410053662hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-sponsor #yiv4410053662ygrp-lc .yiv4410053662ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662activity span .yiv4410053662underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 dd.yiv4410053662last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4410053662 dd.yiv4410053662last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4410053662 dd.yiv4410053662last p span.yiv4410053662yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662file-title a, #yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662file-title a:active, #yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662file-title a:hover, #yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662photo-title a, #yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662photo-title a:active, #yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662photo-title a:hover, #yiv4410053662 div.yiv4410053662photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 div#yiv4410053662ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4410053662ygrp-msg p a span.yiv4410053662yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv4410053662 o {font-size:0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv4410053662 .yiv4410053662replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv4410053662 input, #yiv4410053662 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv4410053662 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4410053662logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-msg p#yiv4410053662attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-reco #yiv4410053662reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-sponsor #yiv4410053662ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-sponsor #yiv4410053662ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-sponsor #yiv4410053662ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv4410053662 #yiv4410053662ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv4410053662
Hi George,

This is definitely not proven without doubt as claimed. Run it through the scientific method to see if there isn't an explanation for the observations.

The waving flag receives power from the astronaut as it isn't held steady. It still has inertia. There isn't enough of atmosphere on the moon to dampen the movements. When the flag was planted in the ground it stopped its movements.

I don't see NASA admitting we never went to the Moon. Using the radiation temperature as a proof isn't good. There are almost no molecules or even plasma up there. Even though the particles represent very high temperatures there aren't enough of them to really heat anything like solid materials. The opposite side away from the Sun is very cold as any heat is radiated away just as quickly as it is received. We being bombarded with the around 5000 K temperature from the sun don't melt. The heat needs to be concentrated to heat physical materials enough to melt. The temperature alone isn't enough for that as it requires the proper amount of heat too. Even the very hot plasma inside a lit fluorescent light doesn't melt the glass tube because of the same reason. The glass tube isn't even hot enough to get a burn. The plasma temperature inside the tube is in the UV range which is twice the temperature of the surface of the sun: https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-device-in-household-which-exceeds-the-surface-temperature-of-Sun https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-device-in-household-which-exceeds-the-surface-temperature-of-Sun

The Van Allen radiation didn't damage the primitive electronics of the Apollo rocket age. Modern processors using electronics with details in the nanometer size are prone to errors in that radiation which has to be accounted for. Either proper shielding or parallel systems like in the old space shuttles or bigger transistors in the chips like in the old obsolete chips could be a solution.

The astronaut interviewed on the space station tells we haven't rockets at the moment to go beyond low orbit. At the time they went to the moon they had some of the biggest rockets ever build. Only some of the latest rockets will be bigger than the Saturn V rockets. This doesn't prove that those big rockets back then couldn't reach the moon.

The radiation problem for a Mars trip will be much greater than that of the short trip to the moon lasting less than a week. He's right that that has to be solved.

We destroyed the technology to go to the moon. Well it probably is made obsolete by the development in technology since then. Our modern computers aren't even compatible to computers of that era. All the other components may be obsolete as well. Even if you own a car or anything else technical of that era made in small quantities it may be hard to find spare parts or blueprints for making new ones. It would definitely be cheaper to start all over using modern technology.

This video doesn't prove what it claims.

Regards
Ole






---In [email protected], <canowindracd@...> wrote :

 Ole,
 

 Maybe we never went to the Moon.
 

 NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI

 

 NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON Unlike all of the other proof over the years about the moon landing hoax, this video will examine how NASA thems... https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI
 

 George
 ...

[7/7] Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.

2017-12-30T04:43:10+00:00 · james glinski <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <CA+uJ=nduEb91OjJiOgn7oWmcdH9pyW=4F9-2SKFJRySYD=urBQ@mail.gmail.com>
NASA may never gone back to the moon .but we go every day on the forum
.those old computers were just a box with a roll of paper and a wood pecker
punching out the type . I'm going to wait for the book to come out . I
heard the Russia's lost a man ..aka was dead on return from radiation .
would the shadow people be part of the flat earth ? Like Balinese shadow
dancing. There flat ! Probably there cover . I heard the Democrats ran out
of dead people to vote and are trying to register Balinese shadow dancers .
On Dec 29, 2017 5:47 PM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hi George,
>
> This is definitely not proven without doubt as claimed. Run it through the
> scientific method to see if there isn't an explanation for the observations.
>
> The waving flag receives power from the astronaut as it isn't held steady.
> It still has inertia. There isn't enough of atmosphere on the moon to
> dampen the movements. When the flag was planted in the ground it stopped
> its movements.
>
> I don't see NASA admitting we never went to the Moon. Using the radiation
> temperature as a proof isn't good. There are almost no molecules or even
> plasma up there. Even though the particles represent very high temperatures
> there aren't enough of them to really heat anything like solid materials.
> The opposite side away from the Sun is very cold as any heat is radiated
> away just as quickly as it is received. We being bombarded with the around
> 5000 K temperature from the sun don't melt. The heat needs to be
> concentrated to heat physical materials enough to melt. The temperature
> alone isn't enough for that as it requires the proper amount of heat too.
> Even the very hot plasma inside a lit fluorescent light doesn't melt the
> glass tube because of the same reason. The glass tube isn't even hot enough
> to get a burn. The plasma temperature inside the tube is in the UV range
> which is twice the temperature of the surface of the sun:
> https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-device-in-household-
> which-exceeds-the-surface-temperature-of-Sun
>
> The Van Allen radiation didn't damage the primitive electronics of the
> Apollo rocket age. Modern processors using electronics with details in the
> nanometer size are prone to errors in that radiation which has to be
> accounted for. Either proper shielding or parallel systems like in the old
> space shuttles or bigger transistors in the chips like in the old obsolete
> chips could be a solution.
>
> The astronaut interviewed on the space station tells we haven't rockets at
> the moment to go beyond low orbit. At the time they went to the moon they
> had some of the biggest rockets ever build. Only some of the latest rockets
> will be bigger than the Saturn V rockets. This doesn't prove that those big
> rockets back then couldn't reach the moon.
>
> The radiation problem for a Mars trip will be much greater than that of
> the short trip to the moon lasting less than a week. He's right that that
> has to be solved.
>
> We destroyed the technology to go to the moon. Well it probably is made
> obsolete by the development in technology since then. Our modern computers
> aren't even compatible to computers of that era. All the other components
> may be obsolete as well. Even if you own a car or anything else technical
> of that era made in small quantities it may be hard to find spare parts or
> blueprints for making new ones. It would definitely be cheaper to start all
> over using modern technology.
>
> This video doesn't prove what it claims.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <canowindracd@...> wrote :
>
> Ole,
>
> Maybe we never went to the Moon.
>
> NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON <https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI>
>
> NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON
> Unlike all of the other proof over the years about the moon landing hoax,
> this video will examine how NASA thems...
> <https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI>
>
> George
> ...
>
> 
>