Body
Unless they come up with a radiation shield it's a waste of time and money
there dead out in space and Mars .the Van Allen belt is real bad .hi speed
protons .it's like walking through a cyclotron .
On Dec 27, 2017 2:12 PM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> The NASA SLS rocket will be bigger than the Saturn V Moon rockets. It will
> be able to make a manned flight to Mars and back again by help from a Moon
> flyby using the gravity of the Moon as a slingshot. The Moon is also used
> to brake the rocket during reentry.
>
> This will be the first time for a manned trip beyond the Moon. At least
> for an official trip that far. This is planned for the coming year. Old
> article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3664527/
> Watch-Nasa-test-biggest-rocket-SLS-booster-one-day-
> man-Mars-passes-final-firing-test.html
>
> When reading ET info they tell that to be able to survive such a trip the
> space ship must carry its own aether or stay in the aether of our planet
> like when only going to the Moon. There can be translation problems in
> transferring technical info from advanced civilizations though. Rockets
> aren't good for long distance. They only accelerate for short periods of
> time (minutes) and achieve low speed when comparing the distances in space.
> A motor that takes energy from the ambient is needed. Just like ships long
> ago traveled around the Earth using wind from the ambient. That technology
> just isn't official yet. To reach the speed of light requires transforming
> all mass of the object into propulsion. To go beyond the speed of light
> requires still more energy. This has to be taken along the trip like the
> old sail ships did by using wind power. That's the way the ETs are visiting
> us. Manipulating gravity is one way of doing propulsion through space.
> Gravity is a deduced effect of electromagnetism according to several
> sources (W.B. Smith, W.J. Hooper, Daniel Fry etc.).
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
> ---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
>
>
> Hello Warren, there is no development in space travel the space shuttle is
> already ancient and retired. Can the USA still fly into space on its own?
> You can sell anything, I think if it were possible, there would be a lot of
> people who would pay a lot of money. I once read that survival outside the
> radiation protection belt of the earth is not so easy. That's why all
> spaceflight missions are within this protective belt. There used to be no
> more propaganda race between the US and the USSR. The Sputnik should also
> be a lie. But I'm not too busy with it. As comparison. Somebody climbed
> Mount Everest at some point and that's not easy, but more and more people
> are doing it. Best regards Sven
>
> Von Samsung Mobile gesendet
>
>
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: "Warren Keillor schoonersolsticemoon@... [EVGRAY]"
> Datum:27.12.2017 19:36 (GMT+01:00)
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
>
>
>
> Sven
> It cost a lot of money to fly to the moon.
> The military industrial complex got redirected for a short time doing a
> lot of research and development, but not making their normal huge profits.
> They failed to come home with bags of gold , or even green cheese, so the
> shareholders pushed for a good old fashioned war in Vietnam where the
> companies produce like crazy, war munitions, and then they blow them all up
> in some distant place making giant profits from a gullible public. Well,
> not quite so gullible, that we didn't complain a bit.
> Oh, they landed on the moon all right, and drove an electric dune buggy
> around.
> Not exactly the right images for selling gas, for gas guzzling Chevrolets,
> and Pontiacs, or those Shelby Mustangs.
> The public's imagination was being spun away from the moon at full speed,
> because it was not good for business.
> The business of the military industrialists was not compatible with multi
> national space efforts.
> Cheers Warren
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:18 PM, 'Sven Friedrich' s.friedrich@...
> [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Ole,
>
> It sounds very plausible but I do not know how to transfer it to the
> transverter. Because there I excite the resonant circuit of the others
> with one coil, there will not flow the same current through both coils.
>
> Hector makes it easier, he says Radio Frequency = Radiant Energy. And VAR
> is a very low frequency radio wave trapped in the LC of a transformer and
> capacitor. That's how I always see it.
>
> I always ask myself or have not found anything yet. The various filters
> such as high pass and low pass as LC block only the interfering frequencies
> or absorb their energy and convert them into the frequency of the filter's
> passage?!?.
>
> This with ET gets too esoteric, although I'm sure there is life on this
> planet, why should not there be life elsewhere? Only the distances are
> insurmountable for my understanding. I am also someone who is firmly
> convinced that no one was yet on the moon, if it really was like that
> someone would have been flying up again in the last 40 years.
>
> Best regards
>
> Sven
>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017 um 16:13 Uhr
> *Von:* "onielsen@... [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
> *An:* [email protected]
> *Betreff:* Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> The magnetic field of a coil is a coherent field. Each turn or fraction of
> a turn sends out part of the magnetic field. By doubling the number of
> turns while having the same current through them quadruples the stored
> energy of the magnetic field. This is coherence. When doubling the number
> of turns by just having two separate coils with the same current going
> through them only doubles the energy stored. This is in a way more like
> superposition where at half the time the waves are added (quadrupling the
> energy) while the remaining time the field cancels out giving no stored
> energy. I consider a magnetic field as made up of shock waves emitted from
> moving charges. When each little wave front becomes coherent they form a
> magnetic field. For figures see 'Matter Is Made Of Waves'
>
> http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/index.htm
>
> Go to chapter 21 on magnetic fields.
>
> [image:
> http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/PROTON10.GIF]
> This is the first figure showing the interference pattern of two point
> emitters. This figure isn't shown as its name is in capital letters while
> the address linking to it use lower case letters. The figures are in this
> folder: http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/
>
> [image:
> http://rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_magnetic_files/MAGNET15.JPG]
> This is the fourth figure that is also missing on the page. Here are three
> point emitters to make up the magnetic field lines. The wavelengths and
> distances must match to make the field pattern. This is where coherence
> comes into play. Random emitted waves doesn't form magnetic fields.
>
> "Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact with
> each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw energy
> from them?"
> No idea. It was intended for a force field and to learn some new physics
> unknown to mankind. The ETs don't seem to agree on how much it's allowed to
> interfere with our world. It can have big consequences for them if they're
> from a future timeline which it seems that the ones interviewed in this
> book are. The ET crew that visited the Mexican professor aren't allowed to
> visit us any more because of interference by preventing the Russian
> submarine Kursk <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kursk_submarine_disaster>
> from a nuclear explosion that could have stopped the nuclear age. At least
> that's what they tell in the book.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <s.friedrich@...> wrote :
>
> Hello Ole,
>
> the coherent fields in simple words in words and pictures. Could you try
> it? Press 2 magnets together at a certain distance. The fields interact
> with each other, either attractive or repulsive, how do you want to draw
> energy from them?
>
> best regards
>
> Sven
>
>
>
>
>