Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.

Database ID: 105385
2017-12-30T04:43:10+00:00
james glinski <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
<CA+uJ=nduEb91OjJiOgn7oWmcdH9pyW=4F9-2SKFJRySYD=urBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

NASA may never gone back to the moon .but we go every day on the forum
.those old computers were just a box with a roll of paper and a wood pecker
punching out the type . I'm going to wait for the book to come out . I
heard the Russia's lost a man ..aka was dead on return from radiation .
would the shadow people be part of the flat earth ? Like Balinese shadow
dancing. There flat ! Probably there cover . I heard the Democrats ran out
of dead people to vote and are trying to register Balinese shadow dancers .
On Dec 29, 2017 5:47 PM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hi George,
>
> This is definitely not proven without doubt as claimed. Run it through the
> scientific method to see if there isn't an explanation for the observations.
>
> The waving flag receives power from the astronaut as it isn't held steady.
> It still has inertia. There isn't enough of atmosphere on the moon to
> dampen the movements. When the flag was planted in the ground it stopped
> its movements.
>
> I don't see NASA admitting we never went to the Moon. Using the radiation
> temperature as a proof isn't good. There are almost no molecules or even
> plasma up there. Even though the particles represent very high temperatures
> there aren't enough of them to really heat anything like solid materials.
> The opposite side away from the Sun is very cold as any heat is radiated
> away just as quickly as it is received. We being bombarded with the around
> 5000 K temperature from the sun don't melt. The heat needs to be
> concentrated to heat physical materials enough to melt. The temperature
> alone isn't enough for that as it requires the proper amount of heat too.
> Even the very hot plasma inside a lit fluorescent light doesn't melt the
> glass tube because of the same reason. The glass tube isn't even hot enough
> to get a burn. The plasma temperature inside the tube is in the UV range
> which is twice the temperature of the surface of the sun:
> https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-device-in-household-
> which-exceeds-the-surface-temperature-of-Sun
>
> The Van Allen radiation didn't damage the primitive electronics of the
> Apollo rocket age. Modern processors using electronics with details in the
> nanometer size are prone to errors in that radiation which has to be
> accounted for. Either proper shielding or parallel systems like in the old
> space shuttles or bigger transistors in the chips like in the old obsolete
> chips could be a solution.
>
> The astronaut interviewed on the space station tells we haven't rockets at
> the moment to go beyond low orbit. At the time they went to the moon they
> had some of the biggest rockets ever build. Only some of the latest rockets
> will be bigger than the Saturn V rockets. This doesn't prove that those big
> rockets back then couldn't reach the moon.
>
> The radiation problem for a Mars trip will be much greater than that of
> the short trip to the moon lasting less than a week. He's right that that
> has to be solved.
>
> We destroyed the technology to go to the moon. Well it probably is made
> obsolete by the development in technology since then. Our modern computers
> aren't even compatible to computers of that era. All the other components
> may be obsolete as well. Even if you own a car or anything else technical
> of that era made in small quantities it may be hard to find spare parts or
> blueprints for making new ones. It would definitely be cheaper to start all
> over using modern technology.
>
> This video doesn't prove what it claims.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <canowindracd@...> wrote :
>
> Ole,
>
> Maybe we never went to the Moon.
>
> NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON <https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI>
>
> NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON
> Unlike all of the other proof over the years about the moon landing hoax,
> this video will examine how NASA thems...
> <https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI>
>
> George
> ...
>
> 
>

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 29795 invoked by uid 102); 30 Dec 2017 04:43:14 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.143) by m17.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Dec 2017 04:43:14 -0000
X-Received (qmail 25390 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2017 04:43:14 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.170.166) by mtaq4.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Dec 2017 04:43:14 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.128.174 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG ZqeEThkWLDvKIB3mkgNs6LKS51Y0IH.X0Enrlb7dxIEU_8TC C4EdJEMv7_a79G3T1r_aIr38JsIEw82o2GoAdQLvsknn8YmzodoiHOwKOL9X eYlWhWuP5tYdzR_hBj44BaPwsMRofHfqTXgFLd7Rks_3d0DXu2K0A0ej7yJE 5_SPlx4EnduIYLQjktxNTRpg4erLdxWLv8qMDF_P0X_P3wENwGsdRZyM74ae J5YUw9IpwUnLrl7dNUuQs.xoRMiJloHUQN6P6NBdhtV37_zs7T3Ddn0u83oV 7YN1m_VsmANUnK2zmL1yzdAqS331zBk2o9B2U.paRFLusG8NFkiXdPjin83Y 7O.USo4grTNMeToacBD9TqUnl8pa0jd_lh5u1Y0tzNy7z4YrqynePZOd06.L TxeeUCAb.LAr8KuvkI9Lyz8uKbQHTl3i.jTFtFuPCSASPAdxpElkv1M3eC3n 82H.U_CirvwlzWsAJMPirXyJk3sE2kNQunhXtkjkdBOBWl6Xh6z6RVeKkE_L wXeXqCdZW1ZbPV_5Sf55LyRYuQ4o1f2INQhpFO27RXl79pIe39LaF9jGHlPd eNDhdbqPwTi9pMF886sShwM9PqykzR65e6pAOgjp7nmy55I.y8dHvFOSz6sV ir3RRJTb7e9KuDWYpuQkap0Ex.bM7Xvtj9Zd4R.BTTGBnVwQnmtMY4JMTjKS .uCpvBSXb2UAvCTm0IGMnZF4y4DSA.BdBmAF5i8AP0A8KAt864a3EpwSfSkO Y72Xgmvuk3wgCn1NHrp1yTpCLF93xRO_YdXFLZnCYX_QdxLrXIjn5MF7It_h 4cLNB.7V05xqXXB_uvR1v_kmZY1BWzGYRkolaOjxYm8dSogYOQBA41_CUQJ0 KuX02VfsD7Y2RV._eNrZzWppJ2dVfPf4noqeZ.DZIzu3FoMSUXorMHbKQliE BSgzhT0ARFtdbXDmAUL4mlU8ejp6XJ.yMgqW26YxeAENBlGCs3jXvassVi6b 2QAw8l6Vz4gxbtY3.E.Ps063TWjjTPRQEa6TPeVG2WOLmKtKzMEJtme1T5o3 z4P93eIJxYU4ZSFO.jBcUIwxJQUR9Qc.V8ash2B2Ed5modNkJjyowyL4qZVw 7XiNZb2RQbkDACkpLCW4gNTR5TFibnqx773FxcRyqjbh8aZRkximFGToj9NU zd9UkvCZ4jXm7BXRV1Dg2zgv6p1GS7KTpBecbO1hkGTeMI3GU8lws9RsrroQ o0nUdCvTOaMixWuXYXaQtOnRkOH6H3Wx3e21.KOdOPMHk8nOc4ozBYrM0D8. xP3OjcMEC6QQc4IFkYQCws3B6zH4b8hiq9YFeUoU8mymaVqlfKUK10CFNCrW JHJTFb5ggHDT8Vv16QkC_BfOc2y9unvWj48jFHUag3ZA1_1R66qSveBm72pT mHUsVpgWRXBOPPhCjNKfF4NRluXwYIjco1Vzx29PXXfAcJKVMbyQPqHi8aZU x33a98pz1NKAzlQT.XchDzsaD571hKYDjiutR1mFe8yAr5SyQ9ot_KQcPNdd xiTJ
Authentication-Results mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=gmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=gmail.com; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mail-wr0-f174.google.com) (209.85.128.174) by mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 04:43:14 +0000
X-Received by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 36so9681323wrh.1 for <[email protected]>; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:43:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=9N/hnuhc4QjE5Ob6W07xPk6Z8bFTWIeJNuUGNa7TClc=; b=fn9NSDupmX52T9NnDedWZDbH3N4MhHOSpd8VAHoER/2EgvgqsOWyFJTaZXbzDsO+RW 8xr886F7FgkP8Yr2N3FojtIutPLFYld0n2GwDPPhnBUnv1j0iP4B9JKLIHNbTZpofbJr 6ukSSlTVnx3CKTJh/iIHrFeGfucCFa2HGrvaF18lOlmfnoCC97qBb7eNsZHHTVkV+MDj rCj7wO92gA2ccHN0EdYfaQeN7Hc33+s0tQv08GhizyRJ00OiODCAfJPGLdur6t+qHZZI SxO/T0sbqxTiIvNKnzuCz+1IrQGBKfWgQHSxPWUEZ4ABqXX0eanUl+zF7hb/hV8D/bzB VhJA==
X-Gm-Message-State AKGB3mLPL/hzQTOpYcw/20OmN+QfI9RQD2FV0289mUAb5ZbtLHZ0XUEs 02ZSaPKe3vreYGngmUwOdh0J/n0KleqwZe3xZFs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source ACJfBosles0AWgUpdvPyrrmzvAnx0xVBY4B72nlZgqPRb+HzqDM68EOD9UkA0QOEfnuSo+7xo+rg2+SRvabW758Z0Q8=
X-Received by 10.223.183.33 with SMTP id l33mr35355063wre.175.1514608992754; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:43:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.28.234.136 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:43:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received by 10.28.234.136 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 20:43:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date Sat, 30 Dec 2017 04:43:10 +0000
Message-ID <CA+uJ=nduEb91OjJiOgn7oWmcdH9pyW=4F9-2SKFJRySYD=urBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To [email protected]
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="f40304388ec0fc9f99056187622b"
X-Originating-IP 98.139.170.166
Subject Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=330388810; y=tG9JTCxE2HjbDxHcF5HN9Nrv9ftYMsC2gmzErZqUnHysyAlXFq4
X-Yahoo-Profile glinski_jim
From James Glinski <[email protected]>