Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.

Database ID: 105381
2017-12-29T23:47:09+00:00
onielsen2000 <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

Hi George,

This is definitely not proven without doubt as claimed. Run it through the scientific method to see if there isn't an explanation for the observations.

The waving flag receives power from the astronaut as it isn't held steady. It still has inertia. There isn't enough of atmosphere on the moon to dampen the movements. When the flag was planted in the ground it stopped its movements.

I don't see NASA admitting we never went to the Moon. Using the radiation temperature as a proof isn't good. There are almost no molecules or even plasma up there. Even though the particles represent very high temperatures there aren't enough of them to really heat anything like solid materials. The opposite side away from the Sun is very cold as any heat is radiated away just as quickly as it is received. We being bombarded with the around 5000 K temperature from the sun don't melt. The heat needs to be concentrated to heat physical materials enough to melt. The temperature alone isn't enough for that as it requires the proper amount of heat too. Even the very hot plasma inside a lit fluorescent light doesn't melt the glass tube because of the same reason. The glass tube isn't even hot enough to get a burn. The plasma temperature inside the tube is in the UV range which is twice the temperature of the surface of the sun: https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-device-in-household-which-exceeds-the-surface-temperature-of-Sun https://www.quora.com/Is-there-any-device-in-household-which-exceeds-the-surface-temperature-of-Sun

The Van Allen radiation didn't damage the primitive electronics of the Apollo rocket age. Modern processors using electronics with details in the nanometer size are prone to errors in that radiation which has to be accounted for. Either proper shielding or parallel systems like in the old space shuttles or bigger transistors in the chips like in the old obsolete chips could be a solution.

The astronaut interviewed on the space station tells we haven't rockets at the moment to go beyond low orbit. At the time they went to the moon they had some of the biggest rockets ever build. Only some of the latest rockets will be bigger than the Saturn V rockets. This doesn't prove that those big rockets back then couldn't reach the moon.

The radiation problem for a Mars trip will be much greater than that of the short trip to the moon lasting less than a week. He's right that that has to be solved.

We destroyed the technology to go to the moon. Well it probably is made obsolete by the development in technology since then. Our modern computers aren't even compatible to computers of that era. All the other components may be obsolete as well. Even if you own a car or anything else technical of that era made in small quantities it may be hard to find spare parts or blueprints for making new ones. It would definitely be cheaper to start all over using modern technology.

This video doesn't prove what it claims.

Regards
Ole






---In [email protected], <canowindracd@...> wrote :

 Ole,
 

 Maybe we never went to the Moon.
 

 NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI

 

 NASA ADMITS WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON Unlike all of the other proof over the years about the moon landing hoax, this video will examine how NASA thems... https://youtu.be/DpPMoIv1lxI
 

 George
 ...

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 19075 invoked by uid 102); 29 Dec 2017 23:47:12 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.142) by m15.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2017 23:47:12 -0000
X-Received (qmail 12196 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2017 23:47:12 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta1004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (98.139.245.163) by mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2017 23:47:12 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of yahoogroups.com designates 98.137.66.213 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG zxrbG9EWLDttE2RA_Xrt4lm1dReSjAC2SMjScjDq1Vq039xg M8NK4WPpZOeKpFnXxTW_b3fiEAlmX.wDTsipi9bJLpTfO_EolWX29f51Cm3t CqvGOT2_ej.3z2sqgJD.zdnuNy2S9khktciJfr1LfYHpVVt3p2QpciepEtXF dDQ3.fh3fCZ8lcAVmKXmhZuMKyLb8dqWzSF3158.4itgZGSXJ13YRZsCY9kC 9Dzw3VfiYEffn6S4W2bbDsZ3utpCyz.EXXgZuRc6MCjidqr0pLL2QY8RAdnB a7Sxqve1pPtjt_j83TJtFYYEQJ_CJ9XY.euY.4EIEhwHXDG5ZTXBy5KJ8HjI fhF9GmMf.BfAnbupIx1YjyqfM4ZrQjiDO9NWBUWznCCZoRlOtKlSsWRkmfRD pL_o1dPSU1xkenFXltRCSbGgkxUEshS2X_ptyb5y7o3qfu0..aoKMlF3VkXT fHMlVcyMnvktv6s7hj8m0GJQ2cPUlkM4CLBcbMb_n_Dng3Gl6ovG0OieepzG YaY3atCg9InBBzW3cg2DlE4dmtk.2cmmu.vCMDcLb.2g.J73NvC1HiCozj6E 4muUc2XPht21_b1oPLCDIZE52_0p4BrOWX_zkmfHEsJyCWCIiFWDiCJYR4cH Y0.oxvmbVcFO5GvsHXOVOZzX.rfsxlSnxDc05lF14iLO04h9tzFWEtSHfWE5 dgk.hInj29BcZzKa_xWGOaJAQXCuAWAfi6bBsBsixYvMJAuIZFvDmL3AhBNi AFqQUHKlG3x08vdVqqCj7WOTJAum7nSZBSguyt_ok8nfdB7DDRRKbSQB0scm QutrXnUOSR1OjNzSqxhrVUOX.EBoaF74U8qASWbnIsDLTTYmmQvpbmXDgf8R pKEMOgXHma1EC5ZifEIAfDm.3UWPTHMW7owUSLxkxN.WiU_tVO5_xFT16dwK nvfsohvSMSw9ft1L9wkXXuCQcUena4g.BHuCg7oRM0uuoQAIkb.GgGocbsGU 2zBQ9AOaYGtfXXmXgCF5XjL6IjPCCYe7XRwFZ6NQfabmeOZGtEvKD4qhWaLT lht4tMm6vCiVWqPQug40pSuw4Hem5o6I3S4aUu6TdOkbvgSblFUi35RsMdDp YUbKVN8UvJG4j3p2yy2FhSFnUJVPLpvKKq5s3wE0fWM_B2ja6sdkr7RfkiSQ tfUl5IkMH5a6u0RDn2nYs4cyy4IF5lCJwLy7vufbWHCQKQvduSUb3B8gAPyD hHxmtBNMQM.mon7WwdWHeuhj95TpA_W37n6u31prZjZQL9PHCsdNkakQN3rT Ck1MP6.KW7_NN0yFIqaIGfFKn1gs51unFjcnSUAVMMJtgHkZU_4vdxhK.f.D fsHHe9lqHtOIg3Wh
Authentication-Results mta1004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=yahoogroups.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=yahoogroups.com; dkim=permerror (bad sig)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic319-32.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.137.66.213) by mta1004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 23:47:12 +0000
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic319.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 23:47:11 +0000
Date Fri, 29 Dec 2017 23:47:09 +0000
X-Received from [127.0.0.1] by gapi16.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Dec 2017 23:47:09 -0000
To [email protected]
X-Original-Return-Path [email protected]
X-Original-From [email protected]
X-Mailer Yahoo Groups Message Poster
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property groups-compose
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="9nlWnTS9ocNmxdhsK3FKVLWiM6a5jwOaA8HvrLV"
X-Originating-IP 94.145.200.76
X-Yahoo-Post-IP 94.145.200.76
Reply-To [email protected]
Subject Re: AW: Re: Aw: Re: [EVGRAY] Capacitive coupling of energy.
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=115023864; y=Zr9q-l4eSevo4sb2KCWLLW_lr2jf-xfswnos8n_v8RJpva5Tfq_h
X-Yahoo-Profile onielsen2000
From [email protected]