Fate of the Magnetic Resonant Rectifier (MRA)

This old Researcher is getting Long in the tooth so to speak and would 
like for all of you out there to know the truth behind the demise of the 
MRA as we lived it. Sequence of events.

12/11/94
From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: AC Battery

Hi Norm: This circuit is basically an AC battery, which is connected to 
an ordinary bridge rectifier to give DC out. It is a piezo in series 
with a coil connected to a sig gen.  The sig gen is putting out a 
measured half volt, but there is a volt apiece across the piezo and the 
coil as a result of the coil being wrapped around a barium ferrite 
magnet. According to Ohm, this is not possible, and it is ONLY possible 
because the piezo is being resonated at the third octave of the resonant 
freq of the barium ferrite. Let's crank this up and give Mr. Puthoff a 
call.  ~ Joel

===============================================================================

Message 9869                                   DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- PRIVATE --    -- RECEIVED --
To     : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"

NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
       and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
                              --------------------
Hi Joel!  I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
the one we saw in 1994).  That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
speed!!!!!!!!!!!
That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
others...>>>  Jerry
===============================================================================
Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.

01/23/95
From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: Hal's Test Report

Hi Norm: I got a fax from Hal, and he states that the MRA is only 50% of 
unity. He put resistance in series with the primary, over 11 ohms, and 
measured the voltage drop across it to determine input current. In 
effect, he used the only method which would drive the MRA below unity. I 
had already told him about this before he did it, so I don't know why he 
did it. I called Tom to get his slant on it, and he suggested that I 
immediately write back to Hal and point this out, and to keep a dialog 
going with Hal. I sent Hal a fax, which is below this message to you. 
It's going to be up to us to provide the self-sustaining mode of 
operation, and refute Hal's test report. I think that Hal is being 
straight with us, and that he believes his test results. Let's be very 
cool about this... eventually, the truth will be known. We know, and for 
now, that will have to be enough. ~ Joel

  FAX Page 1 of 1
To: Hal Puthoff ~ cc: Scott Little ~ From:  Joel McClain
Subject: Review of MRA Test Measurements

First of all, thank you both for the time and effort which you gave to 
the test of this device. It is very gratifying to us that your 
measurements did not differ with those which we had reported.

I think, however, that we need to continue dialogue with regard to the 
method of determining input power to the MRA, specifically with regard 
to the measurement of primary current. In our testing, we had found that 
adding resistance in series with the primary had the effect of 
increasing primary source current. I had mentioned this to you in one of 
our telephone conversations, and was hoping that you might shed some 
light onto this apparent violation of classical theory.

We had found that primary current, as measured inline with a meter, is 
greater with a resistor in series with the primary than it is with only 
the meter inline. Using Thevenin's Theorem as a basis for using the 
equivalent resistive circuit, we believe that the primary current from 
the source is much lower than your tests indicate.

Adding resistance in series with the primary does, as you indicate, 
cause the MRA to behave as an ordinary series resonant circuit. You have 
verified that which we stipulated. We also noted that we don't know how 
to determine power when source potential exceeds noload. We attempted, 
but were unable to determine this.

The use of a series resistor is not debatable in a classical EM circuit. 
However, classical EM theory excludes the possibility of outputs above 
unity, and adding resistance has already been shown to eliminate the 
over unity effect of the MRA. We hope that you will consider further 
tests which do not add resistance to the primary.

Again Hal and Scott, our sincere thanks to you both. Best regards  ~ 
Joel McClain

01/25/95
From: NORMAN ~ To: JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
Subject: MRA Testing

Jerry: Read carefully what transpired in the Hal Puthoff test of the  
MRA. I now see what you tried to tell us about Hal Puthoff. OK! Go ahead 
and say it "I told you so in the very beginning".  We live and learn.  
The very thing that we pointed out to Hal that would drive the MRA below 
unity during testing is to apply a resistor in series with the primary, 
what did he do, placed a resistor in series and made the MRA into an 
ordinary series resonant transformer which is below unity and then based 
his report of findings on this very point which we had already told him 
was not a valid test for it modified the MRA so that it could not 
possibly be an over-unity device. He just doesn't get it. We are 
proceeding full speed and I have a special MRA running at 7.5 Watts 
output. I am faced with the same problem that you have in that I still 
need that oscillator and front end driver to make it
"stand-alone". In time, In time. ~ Norm


===============================================================================

Message 11346                                  DATE/TIME: 02/08/95 22:25
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA Test Results
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

I have been rather quiet on the subject of the MRA test that was
conducted for I have let Joel handle the responses since he is more
diplomatic the I.  Well I have a few comments for all who are
interested to really ponder.  First let us consider the true nature of
the piezoelectric element in the MRA.  This is probably the most "NON
LINEAR" device that man or nature has ever constructed.  Everyone knows
just how NON linear they are especially when I can hit the piezo with
asimple pulse of 57V and get a return of over 1000V as a response from
this little device.  Now let us look at the peculiar little MRA coil.
First we start with a totally "saturated" magnetic core with a primary
coil and a secondary coil wound directly onto the magnet. We are
"ringing" the crystaline lattice structure of the BaFeSi material that
composes the magnet therefore this component is also "TOTALLY NON
LINEAR".  What do you get when you couple two "TOTALLY NON LINEAR"
devices together into a series resonant circuit where we are driving
one element 3 octaves above the other and producing 9 harmonics and
purposely detuning the circuit to cause one of the harmonics to beat
against the incoming current from the signal source to cause the MRA to
achieve over-unity?????  Well if you haven't figgured it out yet you
have a circuit that does things that are "NOT IN ANY TEXT BOOK
PRINTED". Joel and I have spent countless hours looking at results of
simple experiments conducted with the MRA that simply defy all EM
theory or logic.  Now "please" consider what I have said about how "NON
LINEAR" this whole device is and go down to the last line in the file
MRACLAR.ASC and read the recomendation that we should read "Principles
of Linear Networks" by Friedland, Wing& Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961. I
highly respect Hal puthoff and his theoretical abilities but in the
case of the MRA,  I'm sorry the "light has not come on". This circuit
is over-unity and we are still proceeding with the driver circuit to
make it obvious to all who wish to see and "believe".  Norm


BTW,  The Bible for Resonant, Series and Parallel Circuits is by Terman, 
Stanford University, See attachment.

Tuned to ultra high Q, the circuit looks like this with a rich harmonic 
field.


===============================================================================

Message 11238                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 11:24
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
To     : ALL
Subject: MRA Tech Bulletin
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Well, just for grins I built a "super MRA" which is in the form of a
right cylindrical magnet section with large flanges top and bottom made
of plexiglass so I could wind a very long wire primary and secondary
coil so as to be able to play some turns ratio games without having to
take the unit apart and rewind each time I needed to change ratios. I
did this by winding 18,000 feet of wire on the magnetic core with taps
brought out about every 1000 feet of winding.  This way you can play
some interesting games not only with impedance matching but also with
wire lengths in the windings for resonant tuning as we do in Tesla
Coils.  Any one interested in building the MRA and fine tuning it to
peak out the performance should consider this approach for it provided
me some rather impressive data.  Now there is no doubt about over-unity
for I have been able to back off to practically nothing the input power
to the unit and maintain a healthy output.I am seeing the input
potential from my source amplifier being trippled from an idle availabe
source voltage of 48VAC goimg up tp 160VAC with the MRA tuned to max
gain. You can place a grain of wheat bulb in the primary of the circuit
and it will not even light at all while driving a 120V 3Watt standard
bulb across the bridge rectifier.  Real interesting what happens when
you approach a near perfect impedance and resonant match in the
windings.  This is something that we wanted to do in time. That is the
point all should consider, that is all this takes valuable time and it
will be done by not only Joel and I but by others out there who are
serious researchers such as Hans Becker and others.  Norm

===============================================================================

Message 11288                                  DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 23:37
From   : NORMAN WOOTAN                      -- RECEIVED --
To     : BOB PADDOCK
Subject: MRA Driver
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Bob:  That last device you described may just do the trick, the EL2082.
Do you have any tech data on the "Black Hole Antennea"?  I attended the
Tesla conference and was at their presentation of the "Black Hole
Antennea" but don't have the schematics etc. The text of their
presentation is in the proceedings of the 1992 Tesla conference. A lot
of people have asked about this over the last several years especially
when I have mentioned that it created "Negative Impedance" by the
cancellation going on in the circuit. Quite by accident I stumbled over
something you may find interesting.  Back several weeks ago I mentioned
to Jerry and Joel that I thought a Tesla coil type resonant driver may
be the best approach to driving the MRA since you could accurately tune
a Tesla tank circuit oscillator with a spark gap to match our circuit
requirments and give the 150V punch we need to extract the maximum
energy out of the piezo.  Well I was running my latest MRA driving a 22
Watt flourescent lamp "full brightness at an output of 410V pulsed DC
and disconnected the amplifier lead going to the piezo to check the
unloaded voltage from the signal source (57VAC) when a very small
strand of loose wire came close to the input lead. An arc about 1/8
inch jumped between the leads and held a steady arc with the output
voltage soaring above 1000V and the lamp got "very bright".  Darn near
blew it out.  We know the piezo is a capacitive device with very high
"Q" and would be the perfect cap in a Tesla primary circuit. I will set
up a driver circuit with a high voltage diode to protect the signal
source and use an adjusrable needle spark gap to fine tune the circuit
just to check out this phenomenon.  May be the answer to this "vexing"
driver circuit. Will let you know how it works out.  Norm
===============================================================================

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1074447/pg4     The connection 
of Hal Puthoff and the Institute down in Austin Texas and the NSA/CIA.  
The Institute is run as a screening agency for developments in the 
Energy/ Free Energy arena. A month before the Patent Office was to grant 
our Patent on the MRA, The NSA requested a complete folder on the 
Project from Robert Taylor in Atlanta. Upon Patent granting date, the 
Head of the Patent Office told Dr. Bass that our Patent had been locked 
away and would not be granted with no rejection nor reason for given.  
Miracles never cease for the technology surfaced at the Navy China Lake 
Facility as an ongoing project.  BTW, Hal Puthoff was with Navy 
Intelligence,NSA, CIA. Remote Viewing Program was for CIA/NSA at SRI.   
The FIX was in.

On 2/16/2019 8:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> This old Researcher is getting Long in the tooth so to speak and would 
> like for all of you out there to know the truth behind the demise of 
> the MRA as we lived it. Sequence of events.
>
> 12/11/94
> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: AC Battery
>
> Hi Norm: This circuit is basically an AC battery, which is connected 
> to an ordinary bridge rectifier to give DC out. It is a piezo in 
> series with a coil connected to a sig gen.  The sig gen is putting out 
> a measured half volt, but there is a volt apiece across the piezo and 
> the coil as a result of the coil being wrapped around a barium ferrite 
> magnet. According to Ohm, this is not possible, and it is ONLY 
> possible because the piezo is being resonated at the third octave of 
> the resonant freq of the barium ferrite. Let's crank this up and give 
> Mr. Puthoff a call.  ~ Joel
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 9869                                   DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
> From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- PRIVATE --    -- 
> RECEIVED --
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
> Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
>       and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
>                              --------------------
> Hi Joel!  I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
> a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
> it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
> yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
> the one we saw in 1994).  That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
> stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
> cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
> major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
> his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
> details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
> speed!!!!!!!!!!!
> That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
> is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
> this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
> community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
> you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
> think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
> everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
> others...>>>  Jerry
> ===============================================================================
> Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.
>
> 01/23/95
> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: Hal's Test Report
>
> Hi Norm: I got a fax from Hal, and he states that the MRA is only 50% 
> of unity. He put resistance in series with the primary, over 11 ohms, 
> and measured the voltage drop across it to determine input current. In 
> effect, he used the only method which would drive the MRA below unity. 
> I had already told him about this before he did it, so I don't know 
> why he did it. I called Tom to get his slant on it, and he suggested 
> that I immediately write back to Hal and point this out, and to keep a 
> dialog going with Hal. I sent Hal a fax, which is below this message 
> to you. It's going to be up to us to provide the self-sustaining mode 
> of operation, and refute Hal's test report. I think that Hal is being 
> straight with us, and that he believes his test results. Let's be very 
> cool about this... eventually, the truth will be known. We know, and 
> for now, that will have to be enough. ~ Joel
>
>  FAX Page 1 of 1
> To: Hal Puthoff ~ cc: Scott Little ~ From:  Joel McClain
> Subject: Review of MRA Test Measurements
>
> First of all, thank you both for the time and effort which you gave to 
> the test of this device. It is very gratifying to us that your 
> measurements did not differ with those which we had reported.
>
> I think, however, that we need to continue dialogue with regard to the 
> method of determining input power to the MRA, specifically with regard 
> to the measurement of primary current. In our testing, we had found 
> that adding resistance in series with the primary had the effect of 
> increasing primary source current. I had mentioned this to you in one 
> of our telephone conversations, and was hoping that you might shed 
> some light onto this apparent violation of classical theory.
>
> We had found that primary current, as measured inline with a meter, is 
> greater with a resistor in series with the primary than it is with 
> only the meter inline. Using Thevenin's Theorem as a basis for using 
> the equivalent resistive circuit, we believe that the primary current 
> from the source is much lower than your tests indicate.
>
> Adding resistance in series with the primary does, as you indicate, 
> cause the MRA to behave as an ordinary series resonant circuit. You 
> have verified that which we stipulated. We also noted that we don't 
> know how to determine power when source potential exceeds noload. We 
> attempted, but were unable to determine this.
>
> The use of a series resistor is not debatable in a classical EM  
> circuit. However, classical EM theory excludes the possibility of 
> outputs above unity, and adding resistance has already been shown to 
> eliminate the over unity effect of the MRA. We hope that you will 
> consider further tests which do not add resistance to the primary.
>
> Again Hal and Scott, our sincere thanks to you both. Best regards  ~ 
> Joel McClain
>
> 01/25/95
> From: NORMAN ~ To: JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> Subject: MRA Testing
>
> Jerry: Read carefully what transpired in the Hal Puthoff test of the  
> MRA. I now see what you tried to tell us about Hal Puthoff. OK! Go 
> ahead and say it "I told you so in the very beginning".  We live and 
> learn.  The very thing that we pointed out to Hal that would drive the 
> MRA below unity during testing is to apply a resistor in series with 
> the primary, what did he do, placed a resistor in series and made the 
> MRA into an ordinary series resonant transformer which is below unity 
> and then based his report of findings on this very point which we had 
> already told him was not a valid test for it modified the MRA so that 
> it could not possibly be an over-unity device. He just doesn't get it. 
> We are proceeding full speed and I have a special MRA running at 7.5 
> Watts output. I am faced with the same problem that you have in that I 
> still need that oscillator and front end driver to make it
> "stand-alone". In time, In time. ~ Norm
>
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11346                                  DATE/TIME: 02/08/95 22:25
> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: MRA Test Results
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> I have been rather quiet on the subject of the MRA test that was
> conducted for I have let Joel handle the responses since he is more
> diplomatic the I.  Well I have a few comments for all who are
> interested to really ponder.  First let us consider the true nature of
> the piezoelectric element in the MRA.  This is probably the most "NON
> LINEAR" device that man or nature has ever constructed. Everyone knows
> just how NON linear they are especially when I can hit the piezo with
> asimple pulse of 57V and get a return of over 1000V as a response from
> this little device.  Now let us look at the peculiar little MRA coil.
> First we start with a totally "saturated" magnetic core with a primary
> coil and a secondary coil wound directly onto the magnet. We are
> "ringing" the crystaline lattice structure of the BaFeSi material that
> composes the magnet therefore this component is also "TOTALLY NON
> LINEAR".  What do you get when you couple two "TOTALLY NON LINEAR"
> devices together into a series resonant circuit where we are driving
> one element 3 octaves above the other and producing 9 harmonics and
> purposely detuning the circuit to cause one of the harmonics to beat
> against the incoming current from the signal source to cause the MRA to
> achieve over-unity?????  Well if you haven't figgured it out yet you
> have a circuit that does things that are "NOT IN ANY TEXT BOOK
> PRINTED". Joel and I have spent countless hours looking at results of
> simple experiments conducted with the MRA that simply defy all EM
> theory or logic.  Now "please" consider what I have said about how "NON
> LINEAR" this whole device is and go down to the last line in the file
> MRACLAR.ASC and read the recomendation that we should read "Principles
> of Linear Networks" by Friedland, Wing& Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961. I
> highly respect Hal puthoff and his theoretical abilities but in the
> case of the MRA,  I'm sorry the "light has not come on". This circuit
> is over-unity and we are still proceeding with the driver circuit to
> make it obvious to all who wish to see and "believe". Norm
>
>
> BTW,  The Bible for Resonant, Series and Parallel Circuits is by 
> Terman, Stanford University, See attachment.
>
> Tuned to ultra high Q, the circuit looks like this with a rich 
> harmonic field.
>
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11238                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 11:24
> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: MRA Tech Bulletin
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Well, just for grins I built a "super MRA" which is in the form of a
> right cylindrical magnet section with large flanges top and bottom made
> of plexiglass so I could wind a very long wire primary and secondary
> coil so as to be able to play some turns ratio games without having to
> take the unit apart and rewind each time I needed to change ratios. I
> did this by winding 18,000 feet of wire on the magnetic core with taps
> brought out about every 1000 feet of winding.  This way you can play
> some interesting games not only with impedance matching but also with
> wire lengths in the windings for resonant tuning as we do in Tesla
> Coils.  Any one interested in building the MRA and fine tuning it to
> peak out the performance should consider this approach for it provided
> me some rather impressive data.  Now there is no doubt about over-unity
> for I have been able to back off to practically nothing the input power
> to the unit and maintain a healthy output.I am seeing the input
> potential from my source amplifier being trippled from an idle availabe
> source voltage of 48VAC goimg up tp 160VAC with the MRA tuned to max
> gain. You can place a grain of wheat bulb in the primary of the circuit
> and it will not even light at all while driving a 120V 3Watt standard
> bulb across the bridge rectifier.  Real interesting what happens when
> you approach a near perfect impedance and resonant match in the
> windings.  This is something that we wanted to do in time. That is the
> point all should consider, that is all this takes valuable time and it
> will be done by not only Joel and I but by others out there who are
> serious researchers such as Hans Becker and others.  Norm
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11288                                  DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 23:37
> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN                      -- RECEIVED --
> To     : BOB PADDOCK
> Subject: MRA Driver
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Bob:  That last device you described may just do the trick, the EL2082.
> Do you have any tech data on the "Black Hole Antennea"?  I attended the
> Tesla conference and was at their presentation of the "Black Hole
> Antennea" but don't have the schematics etc. The text of their
> presentation is in the proceedings of the 1992 Tesla conference.  A lot
> of people have asked about this over the last several years especially
> when I have mentioned that it created "Negative Impedance" by the
> cancellation going on in the circuit. Quite by accident I stumbled over
> something you may find interesting.  Back several weeks ago I mentioned
> to Jerry and Joel that I thought a Tesla coil type resonant driver may
> be the best approach to driving the MRA since you could accurately tune
> a Tesla tank circuit oscillator with a spark gap to match our circuit
> requirments and give the 150V punch we need to extract the maximum
> energy out of the piezo.  Well I was running my latest MRA driving a 22
> Watt flourescent lamp "full brightness at an output of 410V pulsed DC
> and disconnected the amplifier lead going to the piezo to check the
> unloaded voltage from the signal source (57VAC) when a very small
> strand of loose wire came close to the input lead. An arc about 1/8
> inch jumped between the leads and held a steady arc with the output
> voltage soaring above 1000V and the lamp got "very bright".  Darn near
> blew it out.  We know the piezo is a capacitive device with very high
> "Q" and would be the perfect cap in a Tesla primary circuit. I will set
> up a driver circuit with a high voltage diode to protect the signal
> source and use an adjusrable needle spark gap to fine tune the circuit
> just to check out this phenomenon.  May be the answer to this "vexing"
> driver circuit. Will let you know how it works out.  Norm
> ===============================================================================
>
>
>

After my departure from the Military and DOD Research and having served 
two tours in Vietnam, I developed an attitude such that I would say 
"What are you going to do to me, Send me back to Vietnam"?   I'm too old 
for all this Bull Shit.    I call it Hector Attitude.   Lol

On 2/16/2019 10:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1074447/pg4 The connection 
> of Hal Puthoff and the Institute down in Austin Texas and the 
> NSA/CIA.  The Institute is run as a screening agency for developments 
> in the Energy/ Free Energy arena. A month before the Patent Office was 
> to grant our Patent on the MRA, The NSA requested a complete folder on 
> the Project from Robert Taylor in Atlanta. Upon Patent granting date, 
> the Head of the Patent Office told Dr. Bass that our Patent had been 
> locked away and would not be granted with no rejection nor reason for 
> given.  Miracles never cease for the technology surfaced at the Navy 
> China Lake Facility as an ongoing project.  BTW, Hal Puthoff was with 
> Navy Intelligence,NSA, CIA. Remote Viewing Program was for CIA/NSA at 
> SRI.   The FIX was in.
>
> On 2/16/2019 8:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> This old Researcher is getting Long in the tooth so to speak and 
>> would like for all of you out there to know the truth behind the 
>> demise of the MRA as we lived it. Sequence of events.
>>
>> 12/11/94
>> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: AC Battery
>>
>> Hi Norm: This circuit is basically an AC battery, which is connected 
>> to an ordinary bridge rectifier to give DC out. It is a piezo in 
>> series with a coil connected to a sig gen.  The sig gen is putting 
>> out a measured half volt, but there is a volt apiece across the piezo 
>> and the coil as a result of the coil being wrapped around a barium 
>> ferrite magnet. According to Ohm, this is not possible, and it is 
>> ONLY possible because the piezo is being resonated at the third 
>> octave of the resonant freq of the barium ferrite. Let's crank this 
>> up and give Mr. Puthoff a call.  ~ Joel
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 9869 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
>> From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- PRIVATE --    -- 
>> RECEIVED --
>> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
>> Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
>>       and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
>>                              --------------------
>> Hi Joel!  I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
>> a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
>> it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
>> yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
>> the one we saw in 1994).  That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
>> stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
>> cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
>> major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
>> his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
>> details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
>> speed!!!!!!!!!!!
>> That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
>> is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
>> this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
>> community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
>> you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
>> think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
>> everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
>> others...>>>  Jerry
>> ===============================================================================
>> Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.
>>
>> 01/23/95
>> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: Hal's Test Report
>>
>> Hi Norm: I got a fax from Hal, and he states that the MRA is only 50% 
>> of unity. He put resistance in series with the primary, over 11 ohms, 
>> and measured the voltage drop across it to determine input current. 
>> In effect, he used the only method which would drive the MRA below 
>> unity. I had already told him about this before he did it, so I don't 
>> know why he did it. I called Tom to get his slant on it, and he 
>> suggested that I immediately write back to Hal and point this out, 
>> and to keep a dialog going with Hal. I sent Hal a fax, which is below 
>> this message to you. It's going to be up to us to provide the 
>> self-sustaining mode of operation, and refute Hal's test report. I 
>> think that Hal is being straight with us, and that he believes his 
>> test results. Let's be very cool about this... eventually, the truth 
>> will be known. We know, and for now, that will have to be enough. ~ Joel
>>
>>  FAX Page 1 of 1
>> To: Hal Puthoff ~ cc: Scott Little ~ From:  Joel McClain
>> Subject: Review of MRA Test Measurements
>>
>> First of all, thank you both for the time and effort which you gave 
>> to the test of this device. It is very gratifying to us that your 
>> measurements did not differ with those which we had reported.
>>
>> I think, however, that we need to continue dialogue with regard to 
>> the method of determining input power to the MRA, specifically with 
>> regard to the measurement of primary current. In our testing, we had 
>> found that adding resistance in series with the primary had the 
>> effect of increasing primary source current. I had mentioned this to 
>> you in one of our telephone conversations, and was hoping that you 
>> might shed some light onto this apparent violation of classical theory.
>>
>> We had found that primary current, as measured inline with a meter, 
>> is greater with a resistor in series with the primary than it is with 
>> only the meter inline. Using Thevenin's Theorem as a basis for using 
>> the equivalent resistive circuit, we believe that the primary current 
>> from the source is much lower than your tests indicate.
>>
>> Adding resistance in series with the primary does, as you indicate, 
>> cause the MRA to behave as an ordinary series resonant circuit. You 
>> have verified that which we stipulated. We also noted that we don't 
>> know how to determine power when source potential exceeds noload. We 
>> attempted, but were unable to determine this.
>>
>> The use of a series resistor is not debatable in a classical EM  
>> circuit. However, classical EM theory excludes the possibility of 
>> outputs above unity, and adding resistance has already been shown to 
>> eliminate the over unity effect of the MRA. We hope that you will 
>> consider further tests which do not add resistance to the primary.
>>
>> Again Hal and Scott, our sincere thanks to you both. Best regards  ~ 
>> Joel McClain
>>
>> 01/25/95
>> From: NORMAN ~ To: JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
>> Subject: MRA Testing
>>
>> Jerry: Read carefully what transpired in the Hal Puthoff test of the  
>> MRA. I now see what you tried to tell us about Hal Puthoff. OK! Go 
>> ahead and say it "I told you so in the very beginning".  We live and 
>> learn. The very thing that we pointed out to Hal that would drive the 
>> MRA below unity during testing is to apply a resistor in series with 
>> the primary, what did he do, placed a resistor in series and made the 
>> MRA into an ordinary series resonant transformer which is below unity 
>> and then based his report of findings on this very point which we had 
>> already told him was not a valid test for it modified the MRA so that 
>> it could not possibly be an over-unity device. He just doesn't get 
>> it. We are proceeding full speed and I have a special MRA running at 
>> 7.5 Watts output. I am faced with the same problem that you have in 
>> that I still need that oscillator and front end driver to make it
>> "stand-alone". In time, In time. ~ Norm
>>
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11346 DATE/TIME: 02/08/95 22:25
>> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> To     : ALL
>> Subject: MRA Test Results
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> I have been rather quiet on the subject of the MRA test that was
>> conducted for I have let Joel handle the responses since he is more
>> diplomatic the I.  Well I have a few comments for all who are
>> interested to really ponder.  First let us consider the true nature of
>> the piezoelectric element in the MRA.  This is probably the most "NON
>> LINEAR" device that man or nature has ever constructed. Everyone knows
>> just how NON linear they are especially when I can hit the piezo with
>> asimple pulse of 57V and get a return of over 1000V as a response from
>> this little device.  Now let us look at the peculiar little MRA coil.
>> First we start with a totally "saturated" magnetic core with a primary
>> coil and a secondary coil wound directly onto the magnet. We are
>> "ringing" the crystaline lattice structure of the BaFeSi material that
>> composes the magnet therefore this component is also "TOTALLY NON
>> LINEAR".  What do you get when you couple two "TOTALLY NON LINEAR"
>> devices together into a series resonant circuit where we are driving
>> one element 3 octaves above the other and producing 9 harmonics and
>> purposely detuning the circuit to cause one of the harmonics to beat
>> against the incoming current from the signal source to cause the MRA to
>> achieve over-unity?????  Well if you haven't figgured it out yet you
>> have a circuit that does things that are "NOT IN ANY TEXT BOOK
>> PRINTED". Joel and I have spent countless hours looking at results of
>> simple experiments conducted with the MRA that simply defy all EM
>> theory or logic.  Now "please" consider what I have said about how "NON
>> LINEAR" this whole device is and go down to the last line in the file
>> MRACLAR.ASC and read the recomendation that we should read "Principles
>> of Linear Networks" by Friedland, Wing& Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961. I
>> highly respect Hal puthoff and his theoretical abilities but in the
>> case of the MRA,  I'm sorry the "light has not come on". This circuit
>> is over-unity and we are still proceeding with the driver circuit to
>> make it obvious to all who wish to see and "believe". Norm
>>
>>
>> BTW,  The Bible for Resonant, Series and Parallel Circuits is by 
>> Terman, Stanford University, See attachment.
>>
>> Tuned to ultra high Q, the circuit looks like this with a rich 
>> harmonic field.
>>
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11238 DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 11:24
>> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> To     : ALL
>> Subject: MRA Tech Bulletin
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> Well, just for grins I built a "super MRA" which is in the form of a
>> right cylindrical magnet section with large flanges top and bottom made
>> of plexiglass so I could wind a very long wire primary and secondary
>> coil so as to be able to play some turns ratio games without having to
>> take the unit apart and rewind each time I needed to change ratios. I
>> did this by winding 18,000 feet of wire on the magnetic core with taps
>> brought out about every 1000 feet of winding.  This way you can play
>> some interesting games not only with impedance matching but also with
>> wire lengths in the windings for resonant tuning as we do in Tesla
>> Coils.  Any one interested in building the MRA and fine tuning it to
>> peak out the performance should consider this approach for it provided
>> me some rather impressive data.  Now there is no doubt about over-unity
>> for I have been able to back off to practically nothing the input power
>> to the unit and maintain a healthy output.I am seeing the input
>> potential from my source amplifier being trippled from an idle availabe
>> source voltage of 48VAC goimg up tp 160VAC with the MRA tuned to max
>> gain. You can place a grain of wheat bulb in the primary of the circuit
>> and it will not even light at all while driving a 120V 3Watt standard
>> bulb across the bridge rectifier.  Real interesting what happens when
>> you approach a near perfect impedance and resonant match in the
>> windings.  This is something that we wanted to do in time. That is the
>> point all should consider, that is all this takes valuable time and it
>> will be done by not only Joel and I but by others out there who are
>> serious researchers such as Hans Becker and others. Norm
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11288 DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 23:37
>> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN                      -- RECEIVED --
>> To     : BOB PADDOCK
>> Subject: MRA Driver
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> Bob:  That last device you described may just do the trick, the EL2082.
>> Do you have any tech data on the "Black Hole Antennea"? I attended the
>> Tesla conference and was at their presentation of the "Black Hole
>> Antennea" but don't have the schematics etc. The text of their
>> presentation is in the proceedings of the 1992 Tesla conference.  A lot
>> of people have asked about this over the last several years especially
>> when I have mentioned that it created "Negative Impedance" by the
>> cancellation going on in the circuit. Quite by accident I stumbled over
>> something you may find interesting.  Back several weeks ago I mentioned
>> to Jerry and Joel that I thought a Tesla coil type resonant driver may
>> be the best approach to driving the MRA since you could accurately tune
>> a Tesla tank circuit oscillator with a spark gap to match our circuit
>> requirments and give the 150V punch we need to extract the maximum
>> energy out of the piezo.  Well I was running my latest MRA driving a 22
>> Watt flourescent lamp "full brightness at an output of 410V pulsed DC
>> and disconnected the amplifier lead going to the piezo to check the
>> unloaded voltage from the signal source (57VAC) when a very small
>> strand of loose wire came close to the input lead. An arc about 1/8
>> inch jumped between the leads and held a steady arc with the output
>> voltage soaring above 1000V and the lamp got "very bright".  Darn near
>> blew it out.  We know the piezo is a capacitive device with very high
>> "Q" and would be the perfect cap in a Tesla primary circuit. I will set
>> up a driver circuit with a high voltage diode to protect the signal
>> source and use an adjusrable needle spark gap to fine tune the circuit
>> just to check out this phenomenon.  May be the answer to this "vexing"
>> driver circuit. Will let you know how it works out. Norm
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>>
>>

> Message 11288                                  DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 23:37
> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN                      -- RECEIVED --
> To     : BOB PADDOCK
> Subject: MRA Driver
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Bob:  That last device you described may just do the trick, the EL2082.
> Do you have any tech data on the "Black Hole Antennea"?  I attended the
> Tesla conference and was at their presentation of the "Black Hole
> Antennea" but don't have the schematics etc. The text of their
> presentation is in the proceedings of the 1992 Tesla conference.

Schematic and other info is here:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070222233759/http://www.unusualresearch.com/Sutton/sutton.htm

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:43 AM Norman Wootan <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1074447/pg4     ... BTW, Hal Puthoff was with Navy Intelligence,NSA, CIA. Remote Viewing Program was for CIA/NSA at SRI.   The FIX was in.

Mars 1,000,000 BC, referenced in Norm's link above:

Remote Viewing of Mars by Joe McMoneagle with RV Target “Mars 1,000,000 BC”:

MARS EXPLORATION, MAY 22, 1984 Document Type: CREST Collection:
STARGATE https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00788r001900760001-9

Volume Two of the, now four (was originally to be an eight) volume
set, 'Star Gate Archives' just started shipping.

https://www.lfr.org/book-store

When I asked Ed May if he had figured out how Remote Viewing worked,
he pointed me to this document (you want the PDF):

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2158244015576056

CIA released 13 million pages of documents. From UFO sightings to
Project Start Gate.

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/collection/crest-25-year-program-archive

Star Gate here:

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/search/site/Stargate

Most of the Remote Viewing documents are under “Stargate” (The proper
project name is 'Star[space]Gate'), doing a search for project code
names such as “Centerlane” and “Grillflame” also return hits.

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/search/site/Stargate

PDF overview of Star Gate:
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R003300210001-2.pdf

UFO Files as well:

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/search/site/ufo%20photo


“Regarding psi warfare, america had the Stargate program and Russia Yuri.”

Russia also had a Remote Viewing program, and I have reason to believe
they still do.