Body
After my departure from the Military and DOD Research and having served
two tours in Vietnam, I developed an attitude such that I would say
"What are you going to do to me, Send me back to Vietnam"? I'm too old
for all this Bull Shit. I call it Hector Attitude. Lol
On 2/16/2019 10:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1074447/pg4 The connection
> of Hal Puthoff and the Institute down in Austin Texas and the
> NSA/CIA. The Institute is run as a screening agency for developments
> in the Energy/ Free Energy arena. A month before the Patent Office was
> to grant our Patent on the MRA, The NSA requested a complete folder on
> the Project from Robert Taylor in Atlanta. Upon Patent granting date,
> the Head of the Patent Office told Dr. Bass that our Patent had been
> locked away and would not be granted with no rejection nor reason for
> given. Miracles never cease for the technology surfaced at the Navy
> China Lake Facility as an ongoing project. BTW, Hal Puthoff was with
> Navy Intelligence,NSA, CIA. Remote Viewing Program was for CIA/NSA at
> SRI. The FIX was in.
>
> On 2/16/2019 8:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> This old Researcher is getting Long in the tooth so to speak and
>> would like for all of you out there to know the truth behind the
>> demise of the MRA as we lived it. Sequence of events.
>>
>> 12/11/94
>> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: AC Battery
>>
>> Hi Norm: This circuit is basically an AC battery, which is connected
>> to an ordinary bridge rectifier to give DC out. It is a piezo in
>> series with a coil connected to a sig gen. The sig gen is putting
>> out a measured half volt, but there is a volt apiece across the piezo
>> and the coil as a result of the coil being wrapped around a barium
>> ferrite magnet. According to Ohm, this is not possible, and it is
>> ONLY possible because the piezo is being resonated at the third
>> octave of the resonant freq of the barium ferrite. Let's crank this
>> up and give Mr. Puthoff a call. ~ Joel
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 9869 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
>> From : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP) -- PRIVATE -- --
>> RECEIVED --
>> To : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
>> Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
>> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>>
>> NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
>> and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
>> --------------------
>> Hi Joel! I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
>> a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
>> it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
>> yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
>> the one we saw in 1994). That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
>> stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
>> cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
>> major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
>> his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
>> details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
>> speed!!!!!!!!!!!
>> That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
>> is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
>> this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
>> community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
>> you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
>> think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
>> everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
>> others...>>> Jerry
>> ===============================================================================
>> Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.
>>
>> 01/23/95
>> From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
>> Subject: Hal's Test Report
>>
>> Hi Norm: I got a fax from Hal, and he states that the MRA is only 50%
>> of unity. He put resistance in series with the primary, over 11 ohms,
>> and measured the voltage drop across it to determine input current.
>> In effect, he used the only method which would drive the MRA below
>> unity. I had already told him about this before he did it, so I don't
>> know why he did it. I called Tom to get his slant on it, and he
>> suggested that I immediately write back to Hal and point this out,
>> and to keep a dialog going with Hal. I sent Hal a fax, which is below
>> this message to you. It's going to be up to us to provide the
>> self-sustaining mode of operation, and refute Hal's test report. I
>> think that Hal is being straight with us, and that he believes his
>> test results. Let's be very cool about this... eventually, the truth
>> will be known. We know, and for now, that will have to be enough. ~ Joel
>>
>> FAX Page 1 of 1
>> To: Hal Puthoff ~ cc: Scott Little ~ From: Joel McClain
>> Subject: Review of MRA Test Measurements
>>
>> First of all, thank you both for the time and effort which you gave
>> to the test of this device. It is very gratifying to us that your
>> measurements did not differ with those which we had reported.
>>
>> I think, however, that we need to continue dialogue with regard to
>> the method of determining input power to the MRA, specifically with
>> regard to the measurement of primary current. In our testing, we had
>> found that adding resistance in series with the primary had the
>> effect of increasing primary source current. I had mentioned this to
>> you in one of our telephone conversations, and was hoping that you
>> might shed some light onto this apparent violation of classical theory.
>>
>> We had found that primary current, as measured inline with a meter,
>> is greater with a resistor in series with the primary than it is with
>> only the meter inline. Using Thevenin's Theorem as a basis for using
>> the equivalent resistive circuit, we believe that the primary current
>> from the source is much lower than your tests indicate.
>>
>> Adding resistance in series with the primary does, as you indicate,
>> cause the MRA to behave as an ordinary series resonant circuit. You
>> have verified that which we stipulated. We also noted that we don't
>> know how to determine power when source potential exceeds noload. We
>> attempted, but were unable to determine this.
>>
>> The use of a series resistor is not debatable in a classical EM
>> circuit. However, classical EM theory excludes the possibility of
>> outputs above unity, and adding resistance has already been shown to
>> eliminate the over unity effect of the MRA. We hope that you will
>> consider further tests which do not add resistance to the primary.
>>
>> Again Hal and Scott, our sincere thanks to you both. Best regards ~
>> Joel McClain
>>
>> 01/25/95
>> From: NORMAN ~ To: JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
>> Subject: MRA Testing
>>
>> Jerry: Read carefully what transpired in the Hal Puthoff test of the
>> MRA. I now see what you tried to tell us about Hal Puthoff. OK! Go
>> ahead and say it "I told you so in the very beginning". We live and
>> learn. The very thing that we pointed out to Hal that would drive the
>> MRA below unity during testing is to apply a resistor in series with
>> the primary, what did he do, placed a resistor in series and made the
>> MRA into an ordinary series resonant transformer which is below unity
>> and then based his report of findings on this very point which we had
>> already told him was not a valid test for it modified the MRA so that
>> it could not possibly be an over-unity device. He just doesn't get
>> it. We are proceeding full speed and I have a special MRA running at
>> 7.5 Watts output. I am faced with the same problem that you have in
>> that I still need that oscillator and front end driver to make it
>> "stand-alone". In time, In time. ~ Norm
>>
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11346 DATE/TIME: 02/08/95 22:25
>> From : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> To : ALL
>> Subject: MRA Test Results
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> I have been rather quiet on the subject of the MRA test that was
>> conducted for I have let Joel handle the responses since he is more
>> diplomatic the I. Well I have a few comments for all who are
>> interested to really ponder. First let us consider the true nature of
>> the piezoelectric element in the MRA. This is probably the most "NON
>> LINEAR" device that man or nature has ever constructed. Everyone knows
>> just how NON linear they are especially when I can hit the piezo with
>> asimple pulse of 57V and get a return of over 1000V as a response from
>> this little device. Now let us look at the peculiar little MRA coil.
>> First we start with a totally "saturated" magnetic core with a primary
>> coil and a secondary coil wound directly onto the magnet. We are
>> "ringing" the crystaline lattice structure of the BaFeSi material that
>> composes the magnet therefore this component is also "TOTALLY NON
>> LINEAR". What do you get when you couple two "TOTALLY NON LINEAR"
>> devices together into a series resonant circuit where we are driving
>> one element 3 octaves above the other and producing 9 harmonics and
>> purposely detuning the circuit to cause one of the harmonics to beat
>> against the incoming current from the signal source to cause the MRA to
>> achieve over-unity????? Well if you haven't figgured it out yet you
>> have a circuit that does things that are "NOT IN ANY TEXT BOOK
>> PRINTED". Joel and I have spent countless hours looking at results of
>> simple experiments conducted with the MRA that simply defy all EM
>> theory or logic. Now "please" consider what I have said about how "NON
>> LINEAR" this whole device is and go down to the last line in the file
>> MRACLAR.ASC and read the recomendation that we should read "Principles
>> of Linear Networks" by Friedland, Wing& Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961. I
>> highly respect Hal puthoff and his theoretical abilities but in the
>> case of the MRA, I'm sorry the "light has not come on". This circuit
>> is over-unity and we are still proceeding with the driver circuit to
>> make it obvious to all who wish to see and "believe". Norm
>>
>>
>> BTW, The Bible for Resonant, Series and Parallel Circuits is by
>> Terman, Stanford University, See attachment.
>>
>> Tuned to ultra high Q, the circuit looks like this with a rich
>> harmonic field.
>>
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11238 DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 11:24
>> From : NORMAN WOOTAN
>> To : ALL
>> Subject: MRA Tech Bulletin
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> Well, just for grins I built a "super MRA" which is in the form of a
>> right cylindrical magnet section with large flanges top and bottom made
>> of plexiglass so I could wind a very long wire primary and secondary
>> coil so as to be able to play some turns ratio games without having to
>> take the unit apart and rewind each time I needed to change ratios. I
>> did this by winding 18,000 feet of wire on the magnetic core with taps
>> brought out about every 1000 feet of winding. This way you can play
>> some interesting games not only with impedance matching but also with
>> wire lengths in the windings for resonant tuning as we do in Tesla
>> Coils. Any one interested in building the MRA and fine tuning it to
>> peak out the performance should consider this approach for it provided
>> me some rather impressive data. Now there is no doubt about over-unity
>> for I have been able to back off to practically nothing the input power
>> to the unit and maintain a healthy output.I am seeing the input
>> potential from my source amplifier being trippled from an idle availabe
>> source voltage of 48VAC goimg up tp 160VAC with the MRA tuned to max
>> gain. You can place a grain of wheat bulb in the primary of the circuit
>> and it will not even light at all while driving a 120V 3Watt standard
>> bulb across the bridge rectifier. Real interesting what happens when
>> you approach a near perfect impedance and resonant match in the
>> windings. This is something that we wanted to do in time. That is the
>> point all should consider, that is all this takes valuable time and it
>> will be done by not only Joel and I but by others out there who are
>> serious researchers such as Hans Becker and others. Norm
>>
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>> Message 11288 DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 23:37
>> From : NORMAN WOOTAN -- RECEIVED --
>> To : BOB PADDOCK
>> Subject: MRA Driver
>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>
>> Bob: That last device you described may just do the trick, the EL2082.
>> Do you have any tech data on the "Black Hole Antennea"? I attended the
>> Tesla conference and was at their presentation of the "Black Hole
>> Antennea" but don't have the schematics etc. The text of their
>> presentation is in the proceedings of the 1992 Tesla conference. A lot
>> of people have asked about this over the last several years especially
>> when I have mentioned that it created "Negative Impedance" by the
>> cancellation going on in the circuit. Quite by accident I stumbled over
>> something you may find interesting. Back several weeks ago I mentioned
>> to Jerry and Joel that I thought a Tesla coil type resonant driver may
>> be the best approach to driving the MRA since you could accurately tune
>> a Tesla tank circuit oscillator with a spark gap to match our circuit
>> requirments and give the 150V punch we need to extract the maximum
>> energy out of the piezo. Well I was running my latest MRA driving a 22
>> Watt flourescent lamp "full brightness at an output of 410V pulsed DC
>> and disconnected the amplifier lead going to the piezo to check the
>> unloaded voltage from the signal source (57VAC) when a very small
>> strand of loose wire came close to the input lead. An arc about 1/8
>> inch jumped between the leads and held a steady arc with the output
>> voltage soaring above 1000V and the lamp got "very bright". Darn near
>> blew it out. We know the piezo is a capacitive device with very high
>> "Q" and would be the perfect cap in a Tesla primary circuit. I will set
>> up a driver circuit with a high voltage diode to protect the signal
>> source and use an adjusrable needle spark gap to fine tune the circuit
>> just to check out this phenomenon. May be the answer to this "vexing"
>> driver circuit. Will let you know how it works out. Norm
>> ===============================================================================
>>
>>
>>