Body
This old Researcher is getting Long in the tooth so to speak and would
like for all of you out there to know the truth behind the demise of the
MRA as we lived it. Sequence of events.
12/11/94
From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: AC Battery
Hi Norm: This circuit is basically an AC battery, which is connected to
an ordinary bridge rectifier to give DC out. It is a piezo in series
with a coil connected to a sig gen. The sig gen is putting out a
measured half volt, but there is a volt apiece across the piezo and the
coil as a result of the coil being wrapped around a barium ferrite
magnet. According to Ohm, this is not possible, and it is ONLY possible
because the piezo is being resonated at the third octave of the resonant
freq of the barium ferrite. Let's crank this up and give Mr. Puthoff a
call. ~ Joel
===============================================================================
Message 9869 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 14:46
From : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP) -- PRIVATE -- -- RECEIVED --
To : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
Subject: (R) Hi Norm, Hal called...
Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
and was forwarded to you by Jerry Decker on 12/13/94 at 14:54
--------------------
Hi Joel! I kind of wish you had not sent that to Hal just yet...he has
a 'reputation' for having spook associactions and he and Hal Fox are in
it for the money, despite what they say...I have a file that I've not
yet posted showing Hal being involved with a nasty death situation (not
the one we saw in 1994). That is one of the reasons Ken Shoulders
stepped away from Hal, because he was trying to take over the charged
cluster technology....major mistake with sending him the papers, major,
major, major.....he will try to improve on it and patent the circuit to
his benefit as he did with Shoulders....so the more public domain
details that can be derived and distributed, the better...and with warp
speed!!!!!!!!!!!
That is the same with Ken McNeil and a few others, you have to know who
is real and who is out there to get rich off others work....god, I hope
this doesn't become one of those.....you see, who cares what the inner
community thinks or says about you if you have millions of bucks that
you did not have to earn....maybe, higher forces will assist but I
think the less involved he is at this early stage, the better for
everyone...now Moray King is a 'real' person as well as a few
others...>>> Jerry
===============================================================================
Rest in peace, Jerry Decker.
01/23/95
From: JOEL MCCLAIN ~ To: NORMAN WOOTAN
Subject: Hal's Test Report
Hi Norm: I got a fax from Hal, and he states that the MRA is only 50% of
unity. He put resistance in series with the primary, over 11 ohms, and
measured the voltage drop across it to determine input current. In
effect, he used the only method which would drive the MRA below unity. I
had already told him about this before he did it, so I don't know why he
did it. I called Tom to get his slant on it, and he suggested that I
immediately write back to Hal and point this out, and to keep a dialog
going with Hal. I sent Hal a fax, which is below this message to you.
It's going to be up to us to provide the self-sustaining mode of
operation, and refute Hal's test report. I think that Hal is being
straight with us, and that he believes his test results. Let's be very
cool about this... eventually, the truth will be known. We know, and for
now, that will have to be enough. ~ Joel
FAX Page 1 of 1
To: Hal Puthoff ~ cc: Scott Little ~ From: Joel McClain
Subject: Review of MRA Test Measurements
First of all, thank you both for the time and effort which you gave to
the test of this device. It is very gratifying to us that your
measurements did not differ with those which we had reported.
I think, however, that we need to continue dialogue with regard to the
method of determining input power to the MRA, specifically with regard
to the measurement of primary current. In our testing, we had found that
adding resistance in series with the primary had the effect of
increasing primary source current. I had mentioned this to you in one of
our telephone conversations, and was hoping that you might shed some
light onto this apparent violation of classical theory.
We had found that primary current, as measured inline with a meter, is
greater with a resistor in series with the primary than it is with only
the meter inline. Using Thevenin's Theorem as a basis for using the
equivalent resistive circuit, we believe that the primary current from
the source is much lower than your tests indicate.
Adding resistance in series with the primary does, as you indicate,
cause the MRA to behave as an ordinary series resonant circuit. You have
verified that which we stipulated. We also noted that we don't know how
to determine power when source potential exceeds noload. We attempted,
but were unable to determine this.
The use of a series resistor is not debatable in a classical EM circuit.
However, classical EM theory excludes the possibility of outputs above
unity, and adding resistance has already been shown to eliminate the
over unity effect of the MRA. We hope that you will consider further
tests which do not add resistance to the primary.
Again Hal and Scott, our sincere thanks to you both. Best regards ~
Joel McClain
01/25/95
From: NORMAN ~ To: JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
Subject: MRA Testing
Jerry: Read carefully what transpired in the Hal Puthoff test of the
MRA. I now see what you tried to tell us about Hal Puthoff. OK! Go ahead
and say it "I told you so in the very beginning". We live and learn.
The very thing that we pointed out to Hal that would drive the MRA below
unity during testing is to apply a resistor in series with the primary,
what did he do, placed a resistor in series and made the MRA into an
ordinary series resonant transformer which is below unity and then based
his report of findings on this very point which we had already told him
was not a valid test for it modified the MRA so that it could not
possibly be an over-unity device. He just doesn't get it. We are
proceeding full speed and I have a special MRA running at 7.5 Watts
output. I am faced with the same problem that you have in that I still
need that oscillator and front end driver to make it
"stand-alone". In time, In time. ~ Norm
===============================================================================
Message 11346 DATE/TIME: 02/08/95 22:25
From : NORMAN WOOTAN
To : ALL
Subject: MRA Test Results
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
I have been rather quiet on the subject of the MRA test that was
conducted for I have let Joel handle the responses since he is more
diplomatic the I. Well I have a few comments for all who are
interested to really ponder. First let us consider the true nature of
the piezoelectric element in the MRA. This is probably the most "NON
LINEAR" device that man or nature has ever constructed. Everyone knows
just how NON linear they are especially when I can hit the piezo with
asimple pulse of 57V and get a return of over 1000V as a response from
this little device. Now let us look at the peculiar little MRA coil.
First we start with a totally "saturated" magnetic core with a primary
coil and a secondary coil wound directly onto the magnet. We are
"ringing" the crystaline lattice structure of the BaFeSi material that
composes the magnet therefore this component is also "TOTALLY NON
LINEAR". What do you get when you couple two "TOTALLY NON LINEAR"
devices together into a series resonant circuit where we are driving
one element 3 octaves above the other and producing 9 harmonics and
purposely detuning the circuit to cause one of the harmonics to beat
against the incoming current from the signal source to cause the MRA to
achieve over-unity????? Well if you haven't figgured it out yet you
have a circuit that does things that are "NOT IN ANY TEXT BOOK
PRINTED". Joel and I have spent countless hours looking at results of
simple experiments conducted with the MRA that simply defy all EM
theory or logic. Now "please" consider what I have said about how "NON
LINEAR" this whole device is and go down to the last line in the file
MRACLAR.ASC and read the recomendation that we should read "Principles
of Linear Networks" by Friedland, Wing& Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961. I
highly respect Hal puthoff and his theoretical abilities but in the
case of the MRA, I'm sorry the "light has not come on". This circuit
is over-unity and we are still proceeding with the driver circuit to
make it obvious to all who wish to see and "believe". Norm
BTW, The Bible for Resonant, Series and Parallel Circuits is by Terman,
Stanford University, See attachment.
Tuned to ultra high Q, the circuit looks like this with a rich harmonic
field.
===============================================================================
Message 11238 DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 11:24
From : NORMAN WOOTAN
To : ALL
Subject: MRA Tech Bulletin
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Well, just for grins I built a "super MRA" which is in the form of a
right cylindrical magnet section with large flanges top and bottom made
of plexiglass so I could wind a very long wire primary and secondary
coil so as to be able to play some turns ratio games without having to
take the unit apart and rewind each time I needed to change ratios. I
did this by winding 18,000 feet of wire on the magnetic core with taps
brought out about every 1000 feet of winding. This way you can play
some interesting games not only with impedance matching but also with
wire lengths in the windings for resonant tuning as we do in Tesla
Coils. Any one interested in building the MRA and fine tuning it to
peak out the performance should consider this approach for it provided
me some rather impressive data. Now there is no doubt about over-unity
for I have been able to back off to practically nothing the input power
to the unit and maintain a healthy output.I am seeing the input
potential from my source amplifier being trippled from an idle availabe
source voltage of 48VAC goimg up tp 160VAC with the MRA tuned to max
gain. You can place a grain of wheat bulb in the primary of the circuit
and it will not even light at all while driving a 120V 3Watt standard
bulb across the bridge rectifier. Real interesting what happens when
you approach a near perfect impedance and resonant match in the
windings. This is something that we wanted to do in time. That is the
point all should consider, that is all this takes valuable time and it
will be done by not only Joel and I but by others out there who are
serious researchers such as Hans Becker and others. Norm
===============================================================================
Message 11288 DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 23:37
From : NORMAN WOOTAN -- RECEIVED --
To : BOB PADDOCK
Subject: MRA Driver
Folder : A, "Public Mail"
Bob: That last device you described may just do the trick, the EL2082.
Do you have any tech data on the "Black Hole Antennea"? I attended the
Tesla conference and was at their presentation of the "Black Hole
Antennea" but don't have the schematics etc. The text of their
presentation is in the proceedings of the 1992 Tesla conference. A lot
of people have asked about this over the last several years especially
when I have mentioned that it created "Negative Impedance" by the
cancellation going on in the circuit. Quite by accident I stumbled over
something you may find interesting. Back several weeks ago I mentioned
to Jerry and Joel that I thought a Tesla coil type resonant driver may
be the best approach to driving the MRA since you could accurately tune
a Tesla tank circuit oscillator with a spark gap to match our circuit
requirments and give the 150V punch we need to extract the maximum
energy out of the piezo. Well I was running my latest MRA driving a 22
Watt flourescent lamp "full brightness at an output of 410V pulsed DC
and disconnected the amplifier lead going to the piezo to check the
unloaded voltage from the signal source (57VAC) when a very small
strand of loose wire came close to the input lead. An arc about 1/8
inch jumped between the leads and held a steady arc with the output
voltage soaring above 1000V and the lamp got "very bright". Darn near
blew it out. We know the piezo is a capacitive device with very high
"Q" and would be the perfect cap in a Tesla primary circuit. I will set
up a driver circuit with a high voltage diode to protect the signal
source and use an adjusrable needle spark gap to fine tune the circuit
just to check out this phenomenon. May be the answer to this "vexing"
driver circuit. Will let you know how it works out. Norm
===============================================================================