Re: [EVGRAY] plasma magnet
3
messages
·
2019-01-22T06:18:28-06:00
→
2019-01-25T08:57:55-06:00
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →
[1/3] Re: [EVGRAY] plasma magnet
2019-01-22T06:18:28-06:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
On 1/22/2019 6:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > To all on this dialog list, I will attempt to respond to Bart's > questions as to defining HEAT and COLD. First I must say that I am a, > somewhat amateur researcher sort of like the Good Old Boy Red Neck > that has an Oldsmobile Toronado (48 Oldsmobile with mud grip tires on > front wheels) on wood blocks in front yard. You just have to address > humor with a little humorous feed back. Bart's question is in regard > to an age old paradox that was found way back around turn of the > Century and was written about in Thermodynamics of Chemistry Text > Books. When studying the phase change of water, we know that in a > closed system (evaporator/ condenser) with very careful > instrumentation (caloriometer) it was found that there was more > caloric energy present on the condensation side of the equation which, > to this day remains unexplained by the very best scholars.� After > studying Tesla's Pyro Ferromagnetic Generator, I wanted to know how > the phase change of a material could provide an electrical output. > That is how I got into researching the Armstrong Electrostatic > Generator that used condensing steam in an insulated discharge nozzle > to accumulate a very powerful electrical charge.� It has been very > recent research developments that help us understand this phenomenon > which has to do with the photon/ virtual photon puzzle.� Digress here. > Back in 1995, Jerry Decker, Cheyenne Turner and I attended a > Conference down in Austin, TX hosted by Hal Puthoff, EarthTech. A > physicists from Austria did a presentation on the very subject that I > was researching which was the Paradox over the water phase change > phenomenon. As he explained, no one has solved the obvious in-balance > in the energy equation.� BTW, during Dr. John Bockris, TA&M > presentation on The Lateral Transmutation of Elements in the Cold > Fusion Cell (Bockris/ Bass Patent application)� Dr. Puthoff's lab > assistant dropped dead in the back of the room due to a burst coronary > artery.� See: > https://www.elsevier.com/books/chemical-thermodynamics/rouquerol/978-0-08-021366-8 > > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295087583_Chemical_Thermodynamics > Very important read. > > See attachment for full PDF.�� If you don't understand the information > in this PDF, you need to take your ball and bat home cause you are > trying to play in the wrong ballpark.� ( pleae download PDF, 16mb, > too, large for YAHOO) > > http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/British-thermal-unit-Btu.html > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_burner I put this document in here > which I think old Warren will appreciate cause he sees the ionization > phenomenon every time he lights up his Oxy/Acetylene torch and adjust > the flame.�� You have to go back and read the works of Tesla to > understand that a flame is an electrical phenomenon that Tesla was > very proud of his exact replication of the flame via electricity. Very > rapid positive ionization (combustion) yields the photon emission in > the various wavelengths of visible light based on the temperatures > present or created in the process. Take the old Oxy/Acetylene flame > for an example. When you light up, you get the orange light wave > length photon emission and a lot of soot due to incomplete combustion. > When the flame is leaned off to the ideal Complete combustion (no > soot, and more blue-like flame is the key) (Stoichiometric) mix you > get the emission of the blue wavelengths which are super high in > caloric value. See burn temperature table of common gasses.�� Bart, I > hope this will sort of clear up your questions.� Norm > > > On 1/21/2019 7:13 PM, bart woodard [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: >> >> Norman, >> �������������� Ok , I started chewing on this and will continue to do >> so until some value has resolved itself lets hope. >> Question.. according to this read and study you are saying >> condensation (electron pairing)has a higher value of charge with in >> vs any other state? correct? >> It does this more so on its descent. >> If so� a condensation "tank" constructed if you will would be able to >> employ itself as an on going capacitor. >> So then the next challenge would be to construct an on going >> environment of static value. Are you also stating that once its >> discharged it has nothing left of itself to continue producing the >> calculative like event ongoing? emp Unless otherwise the event is set >> up to recycle? Once temps have peaked could not the peltiers come in >> to play for ongoing maintenance values for input? >> >> 1/ Built two projects in the past one being like the crystal >> compression some one posted a while back and had a very high scary >> freakish shock to it. >> �� I also coiled a copper pipe spiral like above the device and found >> it also gave off a smaller value . >> Once I took it to a dc motor and it did effect the rpm slightly? It >> was odd results and study. >> Also as Hector mentioned the devices worked more efficiently pointed >> North. I have found this to be true. >> Sometimes 1- 3% noticeably pending outside temperatures. >> >> 2/ In the relationship of photons to heat charge I did this experiment... >> I took a plastic tank the farmers use for spraying. Thinking 1000 >> liter, I constructed 200watt leds inside on the top. >> On the bottom outlet I recycled the water bring it back to the top >> using a pipe and installed an in line vortex with 500 n52 with a >> disruptive design inside. >> The purpose was to see if I could maintain an ongoing charge with in >> the water structure with out using additives.� Was also thinking of >> my pool and hot tub water. >> I hooked up to a row of cucumbers 150ft long in a green house. With >> out using no more than 5% of their usual ingredient I ran it for two >> weeks. >> It maintained its standard ec value and flourished. It bloomed more >> than the other rows and had better tasting cucumbers lol. >> You may think the mags did it by them selves, yes but how ever for >> two weeks? Same water? The temp came up via the led and taco pump >> collecting >> a charge combined with the light and mags to my understandings >> enhancing the ec. >> >> Bart >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of >> Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* January 21, 2019 6:53 AM >> *To:* [email protected]; Bert Pool; Bob Paddock; joel mcclain; >> Lane Wootan; Mbking42; Steven Elswick; Walt; Angel Alvarez; Fredric >> Fletcher; Jon Gentry; Jeane Manning; Toby Grotz >> *Subject:* Re: [EVGRAY] plasma magnet >> >> Ok, Guys, remember what I told you in my paper, What is Heat.� Heat >> is positive ionization and cold is negative ionization. Its all in >> the conversion of electrons into photons as in the case of positive >> ionization and the pairing of photons back into electrons, negative >> ionization,as in the case of cooling. The element Gadolinium >> accomplishes the conversion in the presence or absence of a magnetic >> field.� Tesla's Pyro Ferromagnetic Generator worked this way with the >> molecular phase shift ( face center cubic to body centered cubic) at >> the thermal curie points of iron.� Everything in chemistry and >> physics is electrical based.��� Please understand, as an example, >> boiling water at the phase change into a vapor (positive ionization) >> electrons are converted into emitted photons, IR radiation and upon >> cooling the photon pairing provides the electrons for the water >> stricture to return to the liquid state.� In effect, you have an >> electron pump as demonstrated by Armstrong's Steam Electrostatic >> Generator. >> >> Here is something very important to consider in the Up and Down >> conversion of electrons in that at the simple, relative low >> temperature phase change process as is the case of water, it has been >> proven that more energy exist at the condensation process (electron >> paring) over the evaporation process.�� This has been an age old >> paradox.� When I started exploring the Annihilation-Reconnect >> phenomenon of magnetic flux, it was obvious that an order of >> magnitude discrepancy occurs at the conversion of magnetic flux into >> the photon-virtual photon emission then the paring at the re-connect >> phase giving the violent EMP pulse.�� Just a thought.� At the super >> high temperatures (positive ionization) in a hot plasma the energy >> equation get stood on its ear.� A huge amount of energy is manifest >> at the Re-connect, down conversion. Magneto-Electric. >> >> What is Heat #3 >> >> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of >> >> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of >> >> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of >> >> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this >> >> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted >> >> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My >> >> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented >> >> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in >> >> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most >> >> people do not understand how these devices move thermal >> >> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor >> >> junction.Historically we find that German physicist, >> >> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was >> >> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that >> >> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier >> >> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two >> >> Dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not >> >> Until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of >> >> Both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of >> >> Water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then >> >> Melted when the polarity of the direct current was >> >> Reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100 >> >> Years because of the unavailability of semiconductor >> >> Materials which could provide the wide temperature >> >> Differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became >> >> Available which revived the electric cooling principles.In >> >> The 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling >> >> Devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a >> >> Junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced >> >> Materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore >> >> Thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical >> >> Conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high >> >> Coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first >> >> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years >> >> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a >> >> small temperature differential across the device a weak >> >> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing >> >> the differential provided a proportional increase in current >> >> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the >> >> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on >> >> the Keely Net BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of >> >> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the >> >> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving >> >> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly >> >> reversible situation based on polarity. >> >> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in >> >> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase >> >> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have >> >> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided >> >> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same >> >> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the >> >> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would >> >> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change >> >> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840 >> >> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on >> >> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one >> >> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. >> >> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with >> >> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction >> >> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s) >> >> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the >> >> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and >> >> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or >> >> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the >> >> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material >> >> transitions between phases.More energy is present after >> >> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The >> >> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be >> >> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by >> >> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a >> >> Physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change >> >> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is >> >> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions >> >> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an >> >> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental >> >> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool >> >> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence >> >> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at >> >> a very simple example of heating which may explain this >> >> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is >> >> heated because electrons in the material are converted to >> >> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light >> >> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The >> >> more electrons a material loses the hotter it becomes.Now >> >> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water >> >> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a >> >> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the >> >> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame >> >> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons >> >> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic >> >> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur. >> >> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current >> >> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy >> >> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or >> >> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to >> >> how the process works.All phase change processes work the >> >> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical >> >> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is >> >> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level >> >> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. >> >> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago >> >> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in >> >> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the >> >> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on >> >> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly >> >> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a >> >> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion >> >> generator operates at very high voltages with very little >> >> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion >> >> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical >> >> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember >> >> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal >> >> differential will cause a development of current and voltage >> >> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will >> >> provide some food for thought out there on the Keely Net. >> >> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line >> >> of experimentation.Norm >> >> On 1/19/2019 9:16 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote: >>> >>> Bart >>> >>> Years ago, you made up a prototype experiment, using a rotor, with >>> slanted magnets, much like some self runners seem to be displaying. >>> Perhaps, it might be re-cycled, using these new magnets, with that >>> heat, cold, function, when driven? >>> The trick is to see exactly where this heat, and cold actually >>> appear, in order to exploit this phenomenon. >>> Then measuring how much energy is detected, and how much energy was >>> used to make it happen needs to be tested. >>> Designing a good test is the challenge. >>> Even if it matches contemporary refrigeration, or heating systems, >>> it might be a contender, to be competitive, if simple enough. >>> Cheers Warren >>> >>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> >>> >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 8:22 AM, [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] >>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bart >>> I think I read about this before from some info you sent, in a >>> nutshell, a strong neodymium magnet being pushed towards the >>> gandolimium (sp?)stuff vrestez heat, but when it pulls away it >>> creates cold (other way around?) So its not too difficult to >>> make something mechanical or rotating to createheatorcold or >>> both...maybe they are using the super strong magnets now newly >>> available Norm posted rabout recently(N60 type?) >>> Kone >>> >>
[2/3] Magnetic flux annihilation / Re-connect Solar Flare
2019-01-22T15:39:30-06:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/spectacular-3d-simulation-of-a-massive-solar-flare-from-start-to-finish Watch this beautifully created 3D simulation of a Solar Flare! On 1/22/2019 6:18 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > > On 1/22/2019 6:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >> >> To all on this dialog list, I will attempt to respond to Bart's >> questions as to defining HEAT and COLD. First I must say that I am a, >> somewhat amateur researcher sort of like the Good Old Boy Red Neck >> that has an Oldsmobile Toronado (48 Oldsmobile with mud grip tires on >> front wheels) on wood blocks in front yard. You just have to address >> humor with a little humorous feed back.� Bart's question is in regard >> to an age old paradox that was found way back around turn of the >> Century and was written about in Thermodynamics of Chemistry Text >> Books. When studying the phase change of water, we know that in a >> closed system (evaporator/ condenser) with very careful >> instrumentation (caloriometer) it was found that there was more >> caloric energy present on the condensation side of the equation >> which, to this day remains unexplained by the very best scholars.� >> After studying Tesla's Pyro Ferromagnetic Generator, I wanted to know >> how the phase change of a material could provide an electrical >> output. That is how I got into researching the Armstrong >> Electrostatic Generator that used condensing steam in an insulated >> discharge nozzle to accumulate a very powerful electrical charge.� It >> has been very recent research developments that help us understand >> this phenomenon which has to do with the photon/ virtual photon >> puzzle.� Digress here. Back in 1995, Jerry Decker, Cheyenne Turner >> and I attended a Conference down in Austin, TX hosted by Hal Puthoff, >> EarthTech.� A physicists from Austria did a presentation on the very >> subject that I was researching which was the Paradox over the water >> phase change phenomenon. As he explained, no one has solved the >> obvious in-balance in the energy equation.� BTW, during Dr. John >> Bockris, TA&M presentation on The Lateral Transmutation of Elements >> in the Cold Fusion Cell (Bockris/ Bass Patent application)� Dr. >> Puthoff's lab assistant dropped dead in the back of the room due to a >> burst coronary artery.� See: >> https://www.elsevier.com/books/chemical-thermodynamics/rouquerol/978-0-08-021366-8 >> >> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295087583_Chemical_Thermodynamics >> Very important read. >> >> See attachment for full PDF.�� If you don't understand the >> information in this PDF, you need to take your ball and bat home >> cause you are trying to play in the wrong ballpark.� ( pleae download >> PDF, 16mb, too, large for YAHOO) >> >> http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/British-thermal-unit-Btu.html >> >> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_burner I put this document in >> here which I think old Warren will appreciate cause he sees the >> ionization phenomenon every time he lights up his Oxy/Acetylene torch >> and adjust the flame. You have to go back and read the works of Tesla >> to understand that a flame is an electrical phenomenon that Tesla was >> very proud of his exact replication of the flame via electricity. >> Very rapid positive ionization (combustion) yields the photon >> emission in the various wavelengths of visible light based on the >> temperatures present or created in the process. Take the old >> Oxy/Acetylene flame for an example. When you light up, you get the >> orange light wave length photon emission and a lot of soot due to >> incomplete combustion. When the flame is leaned off to the ideal >> Complete combustion (no soot, and more blue-like flame is the key) >> (Stoichiometric) mix you get the emission of the blue wavelengths >> which are super high in caloric value. See burn temperature table of >> common gasses. Bart, I hope this will sort of clear up your >> questions.� Norm >> >> >> On 1/21/2019 7:13 PM, bart woodard [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: >>> >>> Norman, >>> �������������� Ok , I started chewing on this and will continue to >>> do so until some value has resolved itself lets hope. >>> Question.. according to this read and study you are saying >>> condensation (electron pairing)has a higher value of charge with in >>> vs any other state? correct? >>> It does this more so on its descent. >>> If so� a condensation "tank" constructed if you will would be able >>> to employ itself as an on going capacitor. >>> So then the next challenge would be to construct an on going >>> environment of static value. Are you also stating that once its >>> discharged it has nothing left of itself to continue producing the >>> calculative like event ongoing? emp Unless otherwise the event is >>> set up to recycle? Once temps have peaked could not the peltiers >>> come in to play for ongoing maintenance values for input? >>> >>> 1/ Built two projects in the past one being like the crystal >>> compression some one posted a while back and had a very high scary >>> freakish shock to it. >>> �� I also coiled a copper pipe spiral like above the device and >>> found it also gave off a smaller value . >>> Once I took it to a dc motor and it did effect the rpm slightly? It >>> was odd results and study. >>> Also as Hector mentioned the devices worked more efficiently pointed >>> North. I have found this to be true. >>> Sometimes 1- 3% noticeably pending outside temperatures. >>> >>> 2/ In the relationship of photons to heat charge I did this >>> experiment... >>> I took a plastic tank the farmers use for spraying. Thinking 1000 >>> liter, I constructed 200watt leds inside on the top. >>> On the bottom outlet I recycled the water bring it back to the top >>> using a pipe and installed an in line vortex with 500 n52 with a >>> disruptive design inside. >>> The purpose was to see if I could maintain an ongoing charge with in >>> the water structure with out using additives.� Was also thinking of >>> my pool and hot tub water. >>> I hooked up to a row of cucumbers 150ft long in a green house. With >>> out using no more than 5% of their usual ingredient I ran it for two >>> weeks. >>> It maintained its standard ec value and flourished. It bloomed more >>> than the other rows and had better tasting cucumbers lol. >>> You may think the mags did it by them selves, yes but how ever for >>> two weeks? Same water? The temp came up via the led and taco pump >>> collecting >>> a charge combined with the light and mags to my understandings >>> enhancing the ec. >>> >>> Bart >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of >>> Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* January 21, 2019 6:53 AM >>> *To:* [email protected]; Bert Pool; Bob Paddock; joel mcclain; >>> Lane Wootan; Mbking42; Steven Elswick; Walt; Angel Alvarez; Fredric >>> Fletcher; Jon Gentry; Jeane Manning; Toby Grotz >>> *Subject:* Re: [EVGRAY] plasma magnet >>> >>> Ok, Guys, remember what I told you in my paper, What is Heat.� Heat >>> is positive ionization and cold is negative ionization. Its all in >>> the conversion of electrons into photons as in the case of positive >>> ionization and the pairing of photons back into electrons, negative >>> ionization,as in the case of cooling. The element Gadolinium >>> accomplishes the conversion in the presence or absence of a magnetic >>> field.� Tesla's Pyro Ferromagnetic Generator worked this way with >>> the molecular phase shift ( face center cubic to body centered >>> cubic) at the thermal curie points of iron.� Everything in chemistry >>> and physics is electrical based.��� Please understand, as an >>> example, boiling water at the phase change into a vapor (positive >>> ionization) electrons are converted into emitted photons, IR >>> radiation and upon cooling the photon pairing provides the electrons >>> for the water stricture to return to the liquid state.� In effect, >>> you have an electron pump as demonstrated by Armstrong's Steam >>> Electrostatic Generator. >>> >>> Here is something very important to consider in the Up and Down >>> conversion of electrons in that at the simple, relative low >>> temperature phase change process as is the case of water, it has >>> been proven that more energy exist at the condensation process >>> (electron paring) over the evaporation process.�� This has been an >>> age old paradox.� When I started exploring the >>> Annihilation-Reconnect phenomenon of magnetic flux, it was obvious >>> that an order of magnitude discrepancy occurs at the conversion of >>> magnetic flux into the photon-virtual photon emission then the >>> paring at the re-connect phase giving the violent EMP pulse.�� Just >>> a thought.� At the super high temperatures (positive ionization) in >>> a hot plasma the energy equation get stood on its ear.� A huge >>> amount of energy is manifest at the Re-connect, down conversion. >>> Magneto-Electric. >>> >>> What is Heat #3 >>> >>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of >>> >>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of >>> >>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of >>> >>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this >>> >>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted >>> >>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My >>> >>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented >>> >>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in >>> >>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most >>> >>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal >>> >>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor >>> >>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist, >>> >>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was >>> >>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that >>> >>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier >>> >>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two >>> >>> Dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not >>> >>> Until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of >>> >>> Both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of >>> >>> Water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then >>> >>> Melted when the polarity of the direct current was >>> >>> Reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100 >>> >>> Years because of the unavailability of semiconductor >>> >>> Materials which could provide the wide temperature >>> >>> Differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became >>> >>> Available which revived the electric cooling principles.In >>> >>> The 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling >>> >>> Devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a >>> >>> Junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced >>> >>> Materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore >>> >>> Thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical >>> >>> Conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high >>> >>> Coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first >>> >>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years >>> >>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a >>> >>> small temperature differential across the device a weak >>> >>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing >>> >>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current >>> >>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the >>> >>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on >>> >>> the Keely Net BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of >>> >>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the >>> >>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving >>> >>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly >>> >>> reversible situation based on polarity. >>> >>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in >>> >>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase >>> >>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have >>> >>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided >>> >>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same >>> >>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the >>> >>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would >>> >>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change >>> >>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840 >>> >>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on >>> >>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one >>> >>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. >>> >>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with >>> >>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction >>> >>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s) >>> >>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the >>> >>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and >>> >>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or >>> >>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the >>> >>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material >>> >>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after >>> >>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The >>> >>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be >>> >>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by >>> >>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a >>> >>> Physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change >>> >>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is >>> >>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions >>> >>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an >>> >>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental >>> >>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool >>> >>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence >>> >>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at >>> >>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this >>> >>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is >>> >>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to >>> >>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light >>> >>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The >>> >>> more electrons a material loses the hotter it becomes.Now >>> >>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water >>> >>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a >>> >>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the >>> >>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame >>> >>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons >>> >>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic >>> >>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur. >>> >>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current >>> >>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy >>> >>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or >>> >>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to >>> >>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the >>> >>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical >>> >>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is >>> >>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level >>> >>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. >>> >>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago >>> >>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in >>> >>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the >>> >>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on >>> >>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly >>> >>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a >>> >>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion >>> >>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little >>> >>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion >>> >>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical >>> >>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember >>> >>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal >>> >>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage >>> >>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will >>> >>> provide some food for thought out there on the Keely Net. >>> >>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line >>> >>> of experimentation.Norm >>> >>> On 1/19/2019 9:16 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote: >>>> >>>> Bart >>>> >>>> Years ago, you made up a prototype experiment, using a rotor, with >>>> slanted magnets, much like some self runners seem to be displaying. >>>> Perhaps, it might be re-cycled, using these new magnets, with that >>>> heat, cold, function, when driven? >>>> The trick is to see exactly where this heat, and cold actually >>>> appear, in order to exploit this phenomenon. >>>> Then measuring how much energy is detected, and how much energy was >>>> used to make it happen needs to be tested. >>>> Designing a good test is the challenge. >>>> Even if it matches contemporary refrigeration, or heating systems, >>>> it might be a contender, to be competitive, if simple enough. >>>> Cheers Warren >>>> >>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 8:22 AM, [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] >>>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Bart >>>> I think I read about this before from some info you sent, in a >>>> nutshell, a strong neodymium magnet being pushed towards the >>>> gandolimium (sp?)stuff vrestez heat, but when it pulls away it >>>> creates cold (other way around?) So its not too difficult to >>>> make something mechanical or rotating to createheatorcold or >>>> both...maybe they are using the super strong magnets now newly >>>> available Norm posted rabout recently(N60 type?) >>>> Kone >>>> >>>
[3/3] Re: Magnetic flux annihilation / Re-connect Solar Flare
2019-01-25T08:57:55-06:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Bert, I have been looking more into the PZT, Lead Zirconate EMP generation, Magneto-Electric Effect. Check out these sites. https://phys.org/news/2016-05-scientists-giant-magnetoelectric-effect-bismuth.html https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284097138_Origin_of_the_giant_linear_magnetoelectric_effect_in_perovskite-like_multiferroic_BiFeO_3 https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.1577404��� Bert, MRA all the way!�� High audio freq range. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260732043_Observation_of_nonlinear_magnetoelectric_response_to_magnetic_pulses_in_layered_magnetostrictive-piezoelectric_structures See PDF at attached. On 1/22/2019 3:39 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/spectacular-3d-simulation-of-a-massive-solar-flare-from-start-to-finish > > Watch this beautifully created 3D simulation of a Solar Flare! > > On 1/22/2019 6:18 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >> >> >> On 1/22/2019 6:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>> >>> To all on this dialog list, I will attempt to respond to Bart's >>> questions as to defining HEAT and COLD. First I must say that I am >>> a, somewhat amateur researcher sort of like the Good Old Boy Red >>> Neck that has an Oldsmobile Toronado (48 Oldsmobile with mud grip >>> tires on front wheels) on wood blocks in front yard. You just have >>> to address humor with a little humorous feed back.� Bart's question >>> is in regard to an age old paradox that was found way back around >>> turn of the Century and was written about in Thermodynamics of >>> Chemistry Text Books. When studying the phase change of water, we >>> know that in a closed system (evaporator/ condenser) with very >>> careful instrumentation (caloriometer) it was found that there was >>> more caloric energy present on the condensation side of the equation >>> which, to this day remains unexplained by the very best scholars.� >>> After studying Tesla's Pyro Ferromagnetic Generator, I wanted to >>> know how the phase change of a material could provide an electrical >>> output. That is how I got into researching the Armstrong >>> Electrostatic Generator that used condensing steam in an insulated >>> discharge nozzle to accumulate a very powerful electrical charge.� >>> It has been very recent research developments that help us >>> understand this phenomenon which has to do with the photon/ virtual >>> photon puzzle.� Digress here. Back in 1995, Jerry Decker, Cheyenne >>> Turner and I attended a Conference down in Austin, TX hosted by Hal >>> Puthoff, EarthTech.� A physicists from Austria did a presentation on >>> the very subject that I was researching which was the Paradox over >>> the water phase change phenomenon. As he explained, no one has >>> solved the obvious in-balance in the energy equation.� BTW, during >>> Dr. John Bockris, TA&M presentation on The Lateral Transmutation of >>> Elements in the Cold Fusion Cell (Bockris/ Bass Patent application)� >>> Dr. Puthoff's lab assistant dropped dead in the back of the room due >>> to a burst coronary artery.� See: >>> https://www.elsevier.com/books/chemical-thermodynamics/rouquerol/978-0-08-021366-8 >>> >>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295087583_Chemical_Thermodynamics >>> Very important read. >>> >>> See attachment for full PDF.�� If you don't understand the >>> information in this PDF, you need to take your ball and bat home >>> cause you are trying to play in the wrong ballpark.� ( pleae >>> download PDF, 16mb, too, large for YAHOO) >>> >>> http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/British-thermal-unit-Btu.html >>> >>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_burner I put this document in >>> here which I think old Warren will appreciate cause he sees the >>> ionization phenomenon every time he lights up his Oxy/Acetylene >>> torch and adjust the flame.�� You have to go back and read the works >>> of Tesla to understand that a flame is an electrical phenomenon that >>> Tesla was very proud of his exact replication of the flame via >>> electricity. Very rapid positive ionization (combustion) yields the >>> photon emission in the various wavelengths of visible light based on >>> the temperatures present or created in the process. Take the old >>> Oxy/Acetylene flame for an example. When you light up, you get the >>> orange light wave length photon emission and a lot of soot due to >>> incomplete combustion. When the flame is leaned off to the ideal >>> Complete combustion (no soot, and more blue-like flame is the key) >>> (Stoichiometric) mix you get the emission of the blue wavelengths >>> which are super high in caloric value. See burn temperature table of >>> common gasses.�� Bart, I hope this will sort of clear up your >>> questions.� Norm >>> >>> >>> On 1/21/2019 7:13 PM, bart woodard [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: >>>> >>>> Norman, >>>> �������������� Ok , I started chewing on this and will continue to >>>> do so until some value has resolved itself lets hope. >>>> Question.. according to this read and study you are saying >>>> condensation (electron pairing)has a higher value of charge with in >>>> vs any other state? correct? >>>> It does this more so on its descent. >>>> If so� a condensation "tank" constructed if you will would be able >>>> to employ itself as an on going capacitor. >>>> So then the next challenge would be to construct an on going >>>> environment of static value. Are you also stating that once its >>>> discharged it has nothing left of itself to continue producing the >>>> calculative like event ongoing? emp Unless otherwise the event is >>>> set up to recycle? Once temps have peaked could not the peltiers >>>> come in to play for ongoing maintenance values for input? >>>> >>>> 1/ Built two projects in the past one being like the crystal >>>> compression some one posted a while back and had a very high scary >>>> freakish shock to it. >>>> �� I also coiled a copper pipe spiral like above the device and >>>> found it also gave off a smaller value . >>>> Once I took it to a dc motor and it did effect the rpm slightly? It >>>> was odd results and study. >>>> Also as Hector mentioned the devices worked more efficiently >>>> pointed North. I have found this to be true. >>>> Sometimes 1- 3% noticeably pending outside temperatures. >>>> >>>> 2/ In the relationship of photons to heat charge I did this >>>> experiment... >>>> I took a plastic tank the farmers use for spraying. Thinking 1000 >>>> liter, I constructed 200watt leds inside on the top. >>>> On the bottom outlet I recycled the water bring it back to the top >>>> using a pipe and installed an in line vortex with 500 n52 with a >>>> disruptive design inside. >>>> The purpose was to see if I could maintain an ongoing charge with >>>> in the water structure with out using additives.� Was also thinking >>>> of my pool and hot tub water. >>>> I hooked up to a row of cucumbers 150ft long in a green house. With >>>> out using no more than 5% of their usual ingredient I ran it for >>>> two weeks. >>>> It maintained its standard ec value and flourished. It bloomed more >>>> than the other rows and had better tasting cucumbers lol. >>>> You may think the mags did it by them selves, yes but how ever for >>>> two weeks? Same water? The temp came up via the led and taco pump >>>> collecting >>>> a charge combined with the light and mags to my understandings >>>> enhancing the ec. >>>> >>>> Bart >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf >>>> of Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* January 21, 2019 6:53 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected]; Bert Pool; Bob Paddock; joel mcclain; >>>> Lane Wootan; Mbking42; Steven Elswick; Walt; Angel Alvarez; Fredric >>>> Fletcher; Jon Gentry; Jeane Manning; Toby Grotz >>>> *Subject:* Re: [EVGRAY] plasma magnet >>>> >>>> Ok, Guys, remember what I told you in my paper, What is Heat.� Heat >>>> is positive ionization and cold is negative ionization. Its all in >>>> the conversion of electrons into photons as in the case of positive >>>> ionization and the pairing of photons back into electrons, negative >>>> ionization,as in the case of cooling. The element Gadolinium >>>> accomplishes the conversion in the presence or absence of a >>>> magnetic field. Tesla's Pyro Ferromagnetic Generator worked this >>>> way with the molecular phase shift ( face center cubic to body >>>> centered cubic) at the thermal curie points of iron.� Everything in >>>> chemistry and physics is electrical based.��� Please understand, as >>>> an example, boiling water at the phase change into a vapor >>>> (positive ionization) electrons are converted into emitted photons, >>>> IR radiation and upon cooling the photon pairing provides the >>>> electrons for the water stricture to return to the liquid state.� >>>> In effect, you have an electron pump as demonstrated by Armstrong's >>>> Steam Electrostatic Generator. >>>> >>>> Here is something very important to consider in the Up and Down >>>> conversion of electrons in that at the simple, relative low >>>> temperature phase change process as is the case of water, it has >>>> been proven that more energy exist at the condensation process >>>> (electron paring) over the evaporation process.�� This has been an >>>> age old paradox.� When I started exploring the >>>> Annihilation-Reconnect phenomenon of magnetic flux, it was obvious >>>> that an order of magnitude discrepancy occurs at the conversion of >>>> magnetic flux into the photon-virtual photon emission then the >>>> paring at the re-connect phase giving the violent EMP pulse.�� Just >>>> a thought.� At the super high temperatures (positive ionization) in >>>> a hot plasma the energy equation get stood on its ear.� A huge >>>> amount of energy is manifest at the Re-connect, down conversion. >>>> Magneto-Electric. >>>> >>>> What is Heat #3 >>>> >>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of >>>> >>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of >>>> >>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of >>>> >>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this >>>> >>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted >>>> >>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My >>>> >>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented >>>> >>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in >>>> >>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most >>>> >>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal >>>> >>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor >>>> >>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist, >>>> >>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was >>>> >>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that >>>> >>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier >>>> >>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two >>>> >>>> Dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not >>>> >>>> Until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of >>>> >>>> Both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of >>>> >>>> Water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then >>>> >>>> Melted when the polarity of the direct current was >>>> >>>> Reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100 >>>> >>>> Years because of the unavailability of semiconductor >>>> >>>> Materials which could provide the wide temperature >>>> >>>> Differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became >>>> >>>> Available which revived the electric cooling principles.In >>>> >>>> The 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling >>>> >>>> Devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a >>>> >>>> Junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced >>>> >>>> Materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore >>>> >>>> Thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical >>>> >>>> Conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high >>>> >>>> Coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first >>>> >>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years >>>> >>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a >>>> >>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak >>>> >>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing >>>> >>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current >>>> >>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the >>>> >>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on >>>> >>>> the Keely Net BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of >>>> >>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the >>>> >>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving >>>> >>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly >>>> >>>> reversible situation based on polarity. >>>> >>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in >>>> >>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase >>>> >>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have >>>> >>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided >>>> >>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same >>>> >>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the >>>> >>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would >>>> >>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change >>>> >>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840 >>>> >>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on >>>> >>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one >>>> >>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. >>>> >>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with >>>> >>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction >>>> >>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s) >>>> >>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the >>>> >>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and >>>> >>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or >>>> >>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the >>>> >>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material >>>> >>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after >>>> >>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The >>>> >>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be >>>> >>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by >>>> >>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a >>>> >>>> Physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change >>>> >>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is >>>> >>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions >>>> >>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an >>>> >>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental >>>> >>>> question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool >>>> >>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence >>>> >>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at >>>> >>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this >>>> >>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is >>>> >>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to >>>> >>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light >>>> >>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The >>>> >>>> more electrons a material loses the hotter it becomes.Now >>>> >>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water >>>> >>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a >>>> >>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the >>>> >>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame >>>> >>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons >>>> >>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic >>>> >>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur. >>>> >>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current >>>> >>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy >>>> >>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or >>>> >>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to >>>> >>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the >>>> >>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical >>>> >>>> processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is >>>> >>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level >>>> >>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. >>>> >>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago >>>> >>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in >>>> >>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the >>>> >>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on >>>> >>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly >>>> >>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a >>>> >>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion >>>> >>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little >>>> >>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion >>>> >>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical >>>> >>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember >>>> >>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal >>>> >>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage >>>> >>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will >>>> >>>> provide some food for thought out there on the Keely Net. >>>> >>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line >>>> >>>> of experimentation.Norm >>>> >>>> On 1/19/2019 9:16 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Bart >>>>> >>>>> Years ago, you made up a prototype experiment, using a rotor, with >>>>> slanted magnets, much like some self runners seem to be displaying. >>>>> Perhaps, it might be re-cycled, using these new magnets, with that >>>>> heat, cold, function, when driven? >>>>> The trick is to see exactly where this heat, and cold actually >>>>> appear, in order to exploit this phenomenon. >>>>> Then measuring how much energy is detected, and how much energy >>>>> was used to make it happen needs to be tested. >>>>> Designing a good test is the challenge. >>>>> Even if it matches contemporary refrigeration, or heating systems, >>>>> it might be a contender, to be competitive, if simple enough. >>>>> Cheers Warren >>>>> >>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 8:22 AM, [email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] >>>>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bart >>>>> I think I read about this before from some info you sent, in a >>>>> nutshell, a strong neodymium magnet being pushed towards the >>>>> gandolimium (sp?)stuff vrestez heat, but when it pulls away it >>>>> creates cold (other way around?) So its not too difficult to >>>>> make something mechanical or rotating to createheatorcold or >>>>> both...maybe they are using the super strong magnets now newly >>>>> available Norm posted rabout recently(N60 type?) >>>>> Kone >>>>> >>>>
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →