Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect

See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of EMP, 
flux annihilation-reconnect.  Moray you will be interested in page 34 
(last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!

This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect 
theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018

https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas

https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields

https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html

On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of 
> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect.  Moray you will be interested in 
> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!

Bert Pool sent this to me: 
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm

On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect 
> theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>
> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>
>
> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>
>
> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>
> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of 
>> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in 
>> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm Thank You 
Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I need all the 
info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the Tesla Tech 
Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, Re-connect is 
certainly a current topic in the Scientific Community. The big question 
that has come to light is the emission of PARTICLES from annihilation of 
magnetic flux fields???   What are these super powerful particles? 
Interesting idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes of force) are actually 
a particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon with my experiments with 
the Neutral Spike and describe it as a Magneto-Electric event as John 
Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT doc.  Read the SLAC article very 
carefully and you will see that the emission of a particle flux out of 
black holes fall exactly aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of 
super-luminal velocities and super penetration energy like neutrinos and 
cosmic rays.

On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> Bert Pool sent this to me: 
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>
> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect 
>> theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>
>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>>
>>
>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>>
>>
>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>
>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of 
>>> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in 
>>> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!

Norm, This would somewhat explain the Holt space drive!

On 12/7/2018 6:47 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Bert Pool sent this to me:
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>
> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> >
> > This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect
> > theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
> >
> >
> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas
>
> >
> >
> >
> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields
>
> >
> >
> > https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
> >
> > On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> >> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of
> >> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in
> >> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!
>
>

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob 
Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Lane 
Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, 
Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Angel 
Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher 
<[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel mcclain 
<[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold 
<[email protected]>



https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm Thank You 
Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I need all the 
info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the Tesla Tech 
Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, Re-connect is 
certainly a current topic in the Scientific Community. The big question 
that has come to light is the emission of PARTICLES from annihilation of 
magnetic flux fields???   What are these super powerful particles? 
Interesting idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes of force) are actually 
a particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon with my experiments with 
the Neutral Spike and describe it as a Magneto-Electric event as John 
Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT doc.  Read the SLAC article very 
carefully and you will see that the emission of a particle flux out of 
black holes fall exactly aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of 
super-luminal velocities and super penetration energy like neutrinos and 
cosmic rays.

On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> Bert Pool sent this to me: 
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>
> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect 
>> theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>
>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>>
>>
>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>>
>>
>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>
>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of 
>>> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in 
>>> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!

Norm,

I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in your
response, you having been a student of Walter Russell

Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were
introduced at the same time or one before the other?

On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>  
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
> Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
> To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob
> Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Lane
> Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>,
> Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>,
> Angel Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher
> <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel mcclain
> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil
> Rembold <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm Thank
> You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I need all
> the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the Tesla Tech
> Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, Re-connect is
> certainly a current topic in the Scientific Community. The big
> question that has come to light is the emission of PARTICLES from
> annihilation of magnetic flux fields???   What are these super
> powerful particles? Interesting idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes
> of force) are actually a particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon
> with my experiments with the Neutral Spike and describe it as a
> Magneto-Electric event as John Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT
> doc.  Read the SLAC article very carefully and you will see that the
> emission of a particle flux out of black holes fall exactly aligned
> with the SUPER LIGHT theory of super-luminal velocities and super
> penetration energy like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>
> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> Bert Pool sent this to me:
>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>
>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of
>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>
>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields
>>>
>>>
>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>
>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of
>>>> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in
>>>> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!
>

Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal One, and 
studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the Biblical Story of 
creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief of the Creator of 
everything and it all came out of LIGHT.   GOD said, let there be 
light,  that light was not the light that we are so familiar to.  In my 
opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which BTW is the fundamental particle 
flux of magnetism. It is Magneto-Electric and carries a powerful 
magnetic flux field along with the attendant electric fields. see

On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in your 
> response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
>
> Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were 
> introduced at the same time or one before the other?
>
> On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>> Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>> To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob 
>> Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Lane 
>> Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, 
>> Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, 
>> Angel Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher 
>> <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel mcclain 
>> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil 
>> Rembold <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm Thank 
>> You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I need all 
>> the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the Tesla Tech 
>> Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, Re-connect is 
>> certainly a current topic in the Scientific Community. The big 
>> question that has come to light is the emission of PARTICLES from 
>> annihilation of magnetic flux fields???   What are these super 
>> powerful particles? Interesting idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes 
>> of force) are actually a particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon 
>> with my experiments with the Neutral Spike and describe it as a 
>> Magneto-Electric event as John Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT 
>> doc.  Read the SLAC article very carefully and you will see that the 
>> emission of a particle flux out of black holes fall exactly aligned 
>> with the SUPER LIGHT theory of super-luminal velocities and super 
>> penetration energy like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>>
>> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>> Bert Pool sent this to me: 
>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>>
>>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of 
>>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>>
>>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>>
>>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of 
>>>>> EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in 
>>>>> page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!
>

Norm,

It is interesting the superlight and Russell concept is being proven now
with the super high magnetic fields from galactic centers.   Don Smith
had an interesting concept that we were sitting on so much flux we were
like birds on a line and could not measure it objectively being in the
middle of a maelstrom.    Seems to me the mag particles and the plasma
are inseparable as a universal driver, kind of like lift and drag, or
Lenz.  Ways to work around the interplay with ionization or timing but
the yin and yang of it appear a standing requirement.

Not being a biblical scholar or anything close but always thought first
was the word or logos let there be light hence could be allegory for
some scientific fact RF preceding the superlight.  Hahaha calls for
conjecture bigtime.

I like how your research is very factual and empirical, thanks!

Also great illustrations from your experiments and I had wondered about
a hollow shaft, glad you tried it as it seems to correct some potential
flow issues with the eddys from the output ports and the shaft "ground
effects" "Burnelli" sorry don't know the proper term for hydraulics flow
along a surface.  Then finally with that hollow shaft one can have the
center of the vortex also.  Quite excellent!

How come you did not become a Shriner, fees too high?

On 12/19/2018 7:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal One,
> and studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the Biblical Story
> of creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief of the Creator of
> everything and it all came out of LIGHT.   GOD said, let there be
> light,  that light was not the light that we are so familiar to.  In
> my opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which BTW is the fundamental
> particle flux of magnetism. It is Magneto-Electric and carries a
> powerful magnetic flux field along with the attendant electric fields. see
>
> On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>  
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in
>> your response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
>>
>> Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were
>> introduced at the same time or one before the other?
>>
>> On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>>> Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>> To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob
>>> Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Lane
>>> Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>,
>>> Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>,
>>> Angel Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher
>>> <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel
>>> mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>,
>>> Phil Rembold <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm Thank
>>> You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I need
>>> all the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the Tesla
>>> Tech Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, Re-connect is
>>> certainly a current topic in the Scientific Community. The big
>>> question that has come to light is the emission of PARTICLES from
>>> annihilation of magnetic flux fields???   What are these super
>>> powerful particles? Interesting idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes
>>> of force) are actually a particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon
>>> with my experiments with the Neutral Spike and describe it as a
>>> Magneto-Electric event as John Mileweski theorized in the SUPER
>>> LIGHT doc.  Read the SLAC article very carefully and you will see
>>> that the emission of a particle flux out of black holes fall exactly
>>> aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of super-luminal velocities and
>>> super penetration energy like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>>>
>>> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>> Bert Pool sent this to me:
>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>>>
>>>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of
>>>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon
>>>>>> of EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested
>>>>>> in page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!
>

On 12/19/2018 7:08 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> It is interesting the superlight and Russell concept is being proven 
> now with the super high magnetic fields from galactic centers.   Don 
> Smith had an interesting concept that we were sitting on so much flux 
> we were like birds on a line and could not measure it objectively 
> being in the middle of a maelstrom.    Seems to me the mag particles 
> and the plasma are inseparable as a universal driver, kind of like 
> lift and drag, or Lenz.  Ways to work around the interplay with 
> ionization or timing but the yin and yang of it appear a standing 
> requirement.
>
> Not being a biblical scholar or anything close but always thought 
> first was the word or logos let there be light hence could be allegory 
> for some scientific fact RF preceding the superlight.  Hahaha calls 
> for conjecture bigtime.
>
I for one am not a big Biblical Scholar for sure but when hit over the 
head with solid evidence that there are forces and energy for which we, 
so far have no explanation, you just have to be the curious cat.  
Research. I spent some time with Don Smith and yes, his end game was to 
harness energy from the earth natural magnetic flux fields.  His library 
of magnetic maps showing all the anomalies over the globe was enough 
evidence for me.



> I like how your research is very factual and empirical, thanks!
>
> Also great illustrations from your experiments and I had wondered 
> about a hollow shaft, glad you tried it as it seems to correct some 
> potential flow issues with the eddys from the output ports and the 
> shaft "ground effects" "Burnelli" sorry don't know the proper term for 
> hydraulics flow along a surface.  Then finally with that hollow shaft 
> one can have the center of the vortex also.  Quite excellent!
>
Mick, I studied everything about the Tesla Turbine and could not believe 
how misinformed everyone was regarding its operation. After studying 
Victor Schauberger implosion technology and the Repulsine Turbine, I 
employed the principles into the hollow shaft version to allow operation 
of turbine exhaust in a partial vacuum by running my condenser at 40 
degree F. using the MVR technology with a heat scavenging refrigerant. 
The heat of evaporation (980 BTU/# water) is totally recovered in the 
condenser via refrigerant loop.  This makes the Tesla Turbine truly an 
Implosion Turbine. The Internet sites like Germano etc. never got a 
grasp on Tesla's ingenuity>




> How come you did not become a Shriner, fees too high?
>
> On 12/19/2018 7:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal One, 
>> and studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the Biblical Story 
>> of creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief of the Creator of 
>> everything and it all came out of LIGHT.   GOD said, let there be 
>> light,  that light was not the light that we are so familiar to.  In 
>> my opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which BTW is the fundamental 
>> particle flux of magnetism. It is Magneto-Electric and carries a 
>> powerful magnetic flux field along with the attendant electric 
>> fields. see
>>
>> On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in 
>>> your response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
>>>
>>> Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were 
>>> introduced at the same time or one before the other?
>>>
>>> On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>> Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>>>> Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
>>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>>> To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob 
>>>> Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Lane 
>>>> Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz 
>>>> <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, 
>>>> Walt <[email protected]>, Angel Alvarez 
>>>> <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>, 
>>>> Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel mcclain 
>>>> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil 
>>>> Rembold <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm 
>>>> Thank You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I 
>>>> need all the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the 
>>>> Tesla Tech Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, 
>>>> Re-connect is certainly a current topic in the Scientific 
>>>> Community. The big question that has come to light is the emission 
>>>> of PARTICLES from annihilation of magnetic flux fields???   What 
>>>> are these super powerful particles? Interesting idea that magnetic 
>>>> flux lines (tubes of force) are actually a particle flux flow.  I 
>>>> saw this phenomenon with my experiments with the Neutral Spike and 
>>>> describe it as a Magneto-Electric event as John Mileweski theorized 
>>>> in the SUPER LIGHT doc.  Read the SLAC article very carefully and 
>>>> you will see that the emission of a particle flux out of black 
>>>> holes fall exactly aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of 
>>>> super-luminal velocities and super penetration energy like 
>>>> neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>> Bert Pool sent this to me: 
>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of 
>>>>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon 
>>>>>>> of EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be 
>>>>>>> interested in page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!
>

Norm,

In your closed cycle MVR system based on the size of the unit you built
how much differential in temperature did you require to achieve the 20:1
COP?

This research sounds so fantastic, the ultimate Stirling turbine,  why
did you stop working on the Tesla Turbine MVR system, had you built the
complete proof of concept prototype with the three different
refrigerants?  So much potential here mixing it with your thermocouple
Peltier harvesting concept!!!

What would the cost of such a system to build these days, would most of
the system be available in off the shelf parts aside from the Tesla Turbine?

Your understanding of Don Smith was he looking for a natural high or a
low mag field to perturb or an area with both and a steep differential
nearby that could be modulated similar to flux switching a reluctance motor?




On 12/19/2018 9:33 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
>
> On 12/19/2018 7:08 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>  
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> It is interesting the superlight and Russell concept is being proven
>> now with the super high magnetic fields from galactic centers.   Don
>> Smith had an interesting concept that we were sitting on so much flux
>> we were like birds on a line and could not measure it objectively
>> being in the middle of a maelstrom.    Seems to me the mag particles
>> and the plasma are inseparable as a universal driver, kind of like
>> lift and drag, or Lenz.  Ways to work around the interplay with
>> ionization or timing but the yin and yang of it appear a standing
>> requirement.
>>
>> Not being a biblical scholar or anything close but always thought
>> first was the word or logos let there be light hence could be
>> allegory for some scientific fact RF preceding the superlight. 
>> Hahaha calls for conjecture bigtime.
>>
> I for one am not a big Biblical Scholar for sure but when hit over the
> head with solid evidence that there are forces and energy for which
> we, so far have no explanation, you just have to be the curious cat. 
> Research. I spent some time with Don Smith and yes, his end game was
> to harness energy from the earth natural magnetic flux fields.  His
> library of magnetic maps showing all the anomalies over the globe was
> enough evidence for me.
>
>
>
>> I like how your research is very factual and empirical, thanks!
>>
>> Also great illustrations from your experiments and I had wondered
>> about a hollow shaft, glad you tried it as it seems to correct some
>> potential flow issues with the eddys from the output ports and the
>> shaft "ground effects" "Burnelli" sorry don't know the proper term
>> for hydraulics flow along a surface.  Then finally with that hollow
>> shaft one can have the center of the vortex also.  Quite excellent!
>>
> Mick, I studied everything about the Tesla Turbine and could not
> believe how misinformed everyone was regarding its operation. After
> studying Victor Schauberger implosion technology and the Repulsine
> Turbine, I employed the principles into the hollow shaft version to
> allow operation of turbine exhaust in a partial vacuum by running my
> condenser at 40 degree F. using the MVR technology with a heat
> scavenging refrigerant. The heat of evaporation (980 BTU/# water) is
> totally recovered in the condenser via refrigerant loop.  This makes
> the Tesla Turbine truly an Implosion Turbine.  The Internet sites like
> Germano etc. never got a grasp on Tesla's ingenuity>
>
>
>
>
>> How come you did not become a Shriner, fees too high?
>>
>> On 12/19/2018 7:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>  
>>>
>>> Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal One,
>>> and studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the Biblical
>>> Story of creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief of the
>>> Creator of everything and it all came out of LIGHT.   GOD said, let
>>> there be light,  that light was not the light that we are so
>>> familiar to.  In my opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which BTW is the
>>> fundamental particle flux of magnetism. It is Magneto-Electric and
>>> carries a powerful magnetic flux field along with the attendant
>>> electric fields. see
>>>
>>> On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Norm,
>>>>
>>>> I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in
>>>> your response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
>>>>
>>>> Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were
>>>> introduced at the same time or one before the other?
>>>>
>>>> On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>> Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>>>>> Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
>>>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>,
>>>>> Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>,
>>>>> Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz
>>>>> <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick <[email protected]>,
>>>>> Walt <[email protected]>, Angel Alvarez
>>>>> <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>,
>>>>> Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel mcclain
>>>>> <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil
>>>>> Rembold <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm
>>>>> Thank You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I
>>>>> need all the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the
>>>>> Tesla Tech Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation,
>>>>> Re-connect is certainly a current topic in the Scientific
>>>>> Community. The big question that has come to light is the emission
>>>>> of PARTICLES from annihilation of magnetic flux fields???   What
>>>>> are these super powerful particles? Interesting idea that magnetic
>>>>> flux lines (tubes of force) are actually a particle flux flow.  I
>>>>> saw this phenomenon with my experiments with the Neutral Spike and
>>>>> describe it as a Magneto-Electric event as John Mileweski
>>>>> theorized in the SUPER LIGHT doc.  Read the SLAC article very
>>>>> carefully and you will see that the emission of a particle flux
>>>>> out of black holes fall exactly aligned with the SUPER LIGHT
>>>>> theory of super-luminal velocities and super penetration energy
>>>>> like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>> Bert Pool sent this to me:
>>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of
>>>>>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon
>>>>>>>> of EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be
>>>>>>>> interested in page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!
>

Mick,
I will share with you my knowledge of the bible after a long life of bible study.
The Word or Logos was the first and only thing that Almighty God created directly from Himself and that is why he is referred to as His only begotten Son.  He is also called the First and the Last, meaning he is the First thing created directly by Almighty God and the Last thing created directly by Almighty God.
He is also the First to be resurrected directly by Almighty God and the Last to be resurrected directly by Almighty God.
His other names are King of Kings, Lord of Lords, and Michael the Archangel and after he came to earth to be born as a man he is called Jesus Christ.
Everything else was created indirectly by Almighty God through him, for him and by him.
He worked alongside Almighty God during the rest of the creative works as a master worker, and he is a mighty god but he is not Almighty God, only His Son.
Almighty God was talking to him when He said: "Let us make man in our image".
The word "DAY" has differentmeanings in the Bible. In one place it says that 1,000 years is as aday with Almighty God, and He told Adam and Eve that they would dieon the day that they sinned, so they had to die before reaching 1,000years of age. No human descendants of Adam and Eve were allowed toreach 1,000 years of age because of inherited sin, however, Methuselahreached 969 years, the longest lived human.
The 6 creative days are each 7000 yearslong and we are in Almighty God's rest day, the 7th day, which isalso 7,000 years long, and His only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ mustrule for 1,000 years before he hands over the reconciled Creation backto Almighty God, before His 7,000 year rest day is up. So the 1,000year reign of Christ is very near to its start and that means thatthe start of Armageddon is even closer. But there is much more toknow.
At Luke 23: 43 Jesus said to theevildoer: "Truly I tell you today, (comma) You will be with mein Paradise." Jesus went to hell (the grave) that day and was inhell (the grave) for part of 3 days so the evildoer could not havegone with him to paradise that day. Jesus will resurrect him in thefuture with all the others who are still waiting, such as King DavidActs 2:34 Actually David did not ascend to the heavens.....
Many people believe that their dead loved ones are in Heaven but this is not true, as they are still sleeping in death until they are resurrected. John3:13 Moreover, no man has ascended to heaven but he that descendedfrom heaven the Son of man.

Another point is that Almighty God didnot create planets and those called planets were known in the past aswandering stars. I have not read about Almighty God creating theuniverse or the cosmos in the Bible, but that He only created theheavens and the earth with a dome over the earth and the sun and mooninside the dome and the stars were and are attached to the dome. Ibelieve we should not mention the words "universe or cosmos"when speaking about Almighty God's Creation.
Almighty God's will for mankind has notchanged, and it is His will that faithful men and women will live onthe earth forever. Psalm 37:29 "The righteous themselves willpossess the earth, And they will reside forever upon it".Almighty God did not originally create mankind to live on earth for awhile and then die and then go to heaven; He made them to liveforever on the earth as long as they were obedient.
Many believe that Almighty God came inthe flesh and died for us; this is incorrect. We must learn thedifference between Almighty God and His only-begotten Son who is amighty god. The Scriptures tell us that Almighty God cannot die, butHis only begotten Son known as Jesus was able to die for us.
Michael gave up his spiritual life inheaven to become a man here on the earth, under the Mosaic Law.If anyone could keep the Mosaic Law perfectly he would earn the rightto continue living here on the earth forever or until he sinned;that is why the Jews considered it a curse, because none could keepit perfectly because they were sinners and so they were condemned todeath by the Mosaic Law. The wages of sin is death.
Jesus kept the Law perfectly and earnedthe right to live here on the earth forever, and this is what hesacrificed or gave up to buy back what Adam lost, the right to livehere on the earth forever.
He also gave up his spiritual life forthe angels that sinned and so he became a corresponding ransom forall when he died, so that all could be reconciled at the right timeback to Almighty God, after his thousand year reign is over.
The Lake of Fire is symbolic and thosethrown into it are symbolic. So all can be reconciled back toAlmighty God by Jesus Christ's sacrifice, both humans and spiritcreatures.
Almighty God has all things well under control no matterwhat we think, and His will shall be done according to His greatmercy.
Soon the UN will be the one world government and Almighty God through His only begotten Son will put His one thought into the hearts and minds of the political rulers to give their power and authority to the UN to destroy all false religion on the earth.
Revelation 17 shows false religion pictured as Babylon the Great, the great harlot that has a kingdom over the kings of the earth.  She has prostituted herself to all the kings of the earth and is pictured riding or being supported by the scarlet coloured wild beast an image of the first wild beast.  This beast is the UN and it is shown turning on her and destroying her and eating her up and taking all her treasures and wealth.
The UN plan to be in control of the earth by 2030 or before, so we can look forward to this destruction of  false religion.  This by the way is the start of Almighty God's war of Armageddon and a time of trouble that the earth has never seen.
When every trace of false religion is gone from the earth the political rulers will feel very smug thinking that at last we rule the earth without the help of the clergy.  But then Almighty God through His Only begotten Son finishes His war of Armageddon and destroys the political system, the last traces of the Devil's empire.
Jesus then starts his 1,000 year Kingdom rule to bring mankind and the earth back to perfection so he can hand over the reconciled Creation back to his Father, Almighty God.
Mankind can then live forever on the paradise earth. Pslam 37:29 The righteous themselves will possess the earth and they will reside forever upon it.
Hope this helps you understand the bible and the hope for our future.
George











    On Thursday, 20 December 2018, 12:16:33 am AEDT, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:  
 
     
 

Norm,
 
It is interesting the superlight and Russell concept is being proven now with the super high magnetic fields from galactic centers.   Don Smith had an interesting concept that we were sitting on so much flux we were like birds on a line and could not measure it objectively being in the middle of a maelstrom.    Seems to me the mag particles and the plasma are inseparable as a universal driver, kind of like lift and drag, or Lenz.  Ways to work around the interplay with ionization or timing but the yin and yang of it appear a standing requirement.
 
Not being a biblical scholar or anything close but always thought first was the word or logos let there be light hence could be allegory for some scientific fact RF preceding the superlight.  Hahaha calls for conjecture bigtime.
 
I like how your research is very factual and empirical, thanks!
 
Also great illustrations from your experiments and I had wondered about a hollow shaft, glad you tried it as it seems to correct some potential flow issues with the eddys from the output ports and the shaft "ground effects" "Burnelli" sorry don't know the proper term for hydraulics flow along a surface.  Then finally with that hollow shaft one can have the center of the vortex also.  Quite excellent!
 
How come you did not become a Shriner, fees too high?
 
 On 12/19/2018 7:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
  
    
 
 
Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal One, and studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the Biblical Story of creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief of the Creator of everything and it all came out of LIGHT.   GOD said, let there be light,  that light was not the light that we are so familiar to.  In my opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which BTW is the fundamental particle flux of magnetism. It is Magneto-Electric and carries a powerful magnetic flux field along with the attendant electric fields. see
 

 On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
  
    
 
 
Norm,
 
I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in your response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
 
 
Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were introduced at the same time or one before the other?
 
 On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
  
    
 
 

 
 
 
 -------- Forwarded Message -------- 
| Subject:  | Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect |
| Date:  | Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600 |
| From:  | Norman Wootan <[email protected]> |
| To:  | [email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Angel Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]> |

 
 
 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm Thank You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. I need all the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at the Tesla Tech Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, Re-connect is certainly a current topic in the  Scientific Community. The big question that has come to light is the emission of PARTICLES from annihilation of magnetic flux fields???   What are these super powerful particles? Interesting idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes of force) are actually a particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon with my experiments with the Neutral Spike and describe it as a Magneto-Electric event as John Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT doc.  Read the SLAC article very carefully and you will see that the emission of a particle flux out of black holes fall exactly aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of super-luminal velocities and super penetration energy like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
 
 On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
 
Bert Pool sent this to me: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
 
 On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
 

 This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
 
 https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
 
 https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
 
 https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
 
 On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
 
See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the phenomenon of EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will be interested in page 34 (last page) on the production of "plasmoids"!

Hi  George,
 

 I appreciate your great insights into biblical studies, Thanks!
 

 At one point you had posted concerning how to harvest energy from a transformer at about 300 percent or a 200 percent gain I think it was.
 

 Have you built and proved out such a device?

No Mick I have not built such a device.

    On Thursday, 20 December 2018, 10:41:45 am AEDT, [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:  
 
     

Hi  George,
I appreciate your great insights into biblical studies, Thanks!
At one point you had posted concerning how to harvest energy from a transformer at about 300 percent or a 200 percent gain I think it was.
Have you built and proved out such a device?

Mick, Please understand that, in my lab I had all of the components for 
a stand alone home energy system employing all of the technology's that 
we discussed but I had a commitment to do the prototype machining and 
Proof of Concept presentation for the investor group from GAZPROM. The 
Implosion Vortex Hydrogen Generator took top priority. See 
http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/7097676    US Patent, Process and 
device for producing hydrogen US 7097676 B2

You mentioned the Peltier chips by Marlow Industries , I was salvaging 
out and selling about 100/Mo. of the large chips. I had boxes of them 
for research.  Power generation from the chips was dead nuts simple with 
just a temperature differential. With just 100 degree F differential you 
could get one watt per sq. inch of collector surface.  Far more power/ 
sq. meter than any solar photovoltaic panel.

For low lift MVR, select your refrigerant so as to operate at highest 
pressures at lowest temperature differential. there is a wide choice 
here. You are condensing your driving vapor so almost all latent heat is 
recovered plus the sensible heat.  Your heat scavenging refrigerant is 
collecting heat from all sources including the ambient environment 
(latent heat from RH of air) gray water source, ground water source, 
solar collectors (flat panel water heating panels), you name it.  
Cascade concept of MVR lift insures a great COP.


*efrigerant
No.*

	

*Name*

	

*Molecular Mass*

	

*Boiling point
at atmospheric pressure /14.7 psia, 1 bar abs/
/(^o F)/*

	

Freezing Point
at atmospheric pressure
/14.7 psia, 1 bar abs
(^o F)/

*Critical Point*

*Temperature
/(^o F)/*

	
	

Pressure
/(psia)/

*Specific Volume
/(Cu.Ft./lb.)/*

	

R-10

	

Carbontetrachloride

	

153.8

	

170.2

	

	

	

	

R-11

	

Trichlorofluoromethane^1)

	

137.37

	

74.9

	

-168

	

388

	

640

	

0.0289

R-12 
<https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/dichlorodifluoromethane-R-12-d_972.html>

	

Dichlorodifluoromethane 
<https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/dichlorodifluoromethane-R-12-d_972.html>2)

	

120.91

	

-21.8

	

-252

	

234

	

597

	

0.0287

R-13

	

Monochlorotrifluoromethane

	

104.46

	

-114.6

	

-294

	

84

	

561

	

0.0277

R-13B1

	

Bromotrifluoromethane

	

148.91

	

-72

	

-270

	

153

	

575

	

0.0215

R-14

	

Tetrafluoromethane (Carbon tetrafluoride)

	

88.00

	

-198.2

	

-299

	

-50

	

543

	

0.0256

R-14

	

Chloroform

	

119.4

	

142

	

	

	

	

R-21

	

Dichloro-fluoromethane

	

102.92

	

48.1

	

-211

	

	

	

R-22

	

Difluoromonochloromethane^3)

	

86.468

	

-41.3

	

-256

	

205

	

722

	

0.0305

R-23

	

Trifluormethane

	

70

	

-119.9

	

	

	

	

R-30

	

Methylene Chloride

	

84.9

	

105.2

	

	

	

	

R-31

	

Monochloromonofluoromethane

	

68.5

	

48.0

	

	

	

	

R-32

	

Methylene Fluoride

	

52.0

	

-61.4

	

	

	

	

R-40

	

Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride)

	

50.488

	

-10.7

	

-144

	

290

	

969

	

0.0454

R-41

	

Methyl Fluoride

	

34.0

	

-109

	

	

	

	

R-50

	

Methane

	

16.044

	

-259

	

-296.6

	

	

	

R-110

	

Hexachloroethane

	

236.8

	

365

	

	

	

	

R-111

	

Pentachloromonofluoroethane

	

220.3

	

279

	

	

	

	

R-112

	

Tetrachlorodifluoroethane

	

203.8

	

199.0

	

	

	

	

R-113

	

Trichlorotrifluoroethane^4)

	

187.39

	

118

	

-31

	

417

	

499

	

0.0278

R-114

	

1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane

	

170.92

	

38.4

	

-137

	

294

	

473

	

0.0275

R-115

	

Chloropentafluoroethane

	

154.47

	

-38.0

	

-149

	

176

	

458

	

0.0261

R-116

	

Hexafluoroethane

	

138.0

	

-108.8

	

	

	

	

R-120

	

Pentachloroethane

	

202.3

	

324

	

	

	

	

R-123

	

Dichlorotrifluoroethane^5)

	

152.93

	

82

	

-161

	

363

	

533

	

R-124

	

Monochlorotetrafluoroethane

	

136.5

	

10.4

	

	

	

	

R-125

	

Pentafluoroethane

	

120

	

-55

	

	

	

	

R-133a

	

Monochlorotrifluoroethane

	

118.5

	

43.0

	

	

	

	

R-134a

	

Tetrafluoroethane^6)

	

102.03

	

-15

	

-142

	

214

	

590

	

0.0290

R-140a

	

Trichloroethane

	

133.4

	

165

	

	

	

	

R-142b

	

1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane

	

100.50

	

14

	

-204

	

279

	

598

	

0.0368

R-143a

	

Trifluoroethane

	

84

	

-53.5

	

	

	

	

R-150a

	

Dichloroethane

	

98.9

	

140

	

	

	

	

R-152a

	

Difluoroethane

	

66.05

	

-13

	

	

	

	

R-160

	

Ethyl Chloride

	

64.515

	

12.2

	

-218

	

	

	

R-170

	

Ethane

	

30.070

	

-127

	

-278

	

90

	

710

	

0.0830

R-218

	

Octafluoropropane

	

188

	

-36.4

	

	

	

	

R-290

	

Propane

	

44.097

	

-44

	

-309.8

	

206

	

617

	

0.0728

RC-318

	

Octafluorocyclobutane

	

200.04

	

22

	

-43

	

240

	

404

	

0.0258

R-410A

	

R-32 Difluoromethane (50% weight), R-125 Pentafluoroethane (50% weight)

	

72.6

	

-55.4

	

	

162

	

690

	

R-500

	

Dichlorodifluoromethane/
Difluoroethane^7)

	

99.31

	

-28

	

-254

	

222

	

642

	

0.0323

R-502

	

Chlorodifluoromethane/
Chloropentafluoroethane

	

111.63

	

-50

	

	

180

	

591

	

0.0286

R-503

	

Chlorotrifluoromethane/
Trifluoromethane

	

87.50

	

-128

	

	

67

	

607

	

0.0326

R-600

	

n-Butane

	

58.12

	

31.2

	

-217

	

306

	

551

	

0.0702

R-600a

	

Isobutane (2-Methyl propane)

	

58.12

	

10.8

	

-229

	

275

	

529

	

0.0725

R-611

	

Methyl formate

	

60.05

	

89

	

-146

	

417

	

870

	

0.0459

R-702

	

Hydrogen

	

2.016

	

-423

	

-434.6

	

	

	

R-704

	

Helium

	

4.0026

	

-452

	

	

	

	

R-717 <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ammonia-d_971.html>

	

Ammonia <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ammonia-d_971.html>

	

17.02

	

-28

	

-107.9

	

271

	

1657

	

0.0680

R-720

	

Neon

	

20.179

	

-410.9

	

-415.6

	

	

	

R-728

	

Nitrogen

	

28.0134

	

-320.4

	

-346

	

	

	

R-729

	

Air

	

28.966

	

-320

	

-357.2

	

	

	

R-732

	

Oxygen

	

31.9988

	

-297.3

	

-361.3

	

	

	

R-740

	

Argon

	

39.948

	

-303

	

-308.5

	

	

	

R-744

	

Carbon Dioxide

	

44.01

	

-109.4

	

-70

	

88

	

1070

	

0.0342

R-744A

	

Nitrous Oxide

	

44.012

	

-127.3

	

-131.5

	

	

	

R-764

	

Sulfur Dioxide

	

64.06

	

14.0

	

-104

	

316

	

1143

	

0.0306

R-1150

	

Ethylene

	

28.05

	

-155

	

-272

	

49

	

742

	

0.0700


	
	
	
	
	
	
	


On 12/19/2018 6:53 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> In your closed cycle MVR system based on the size of the unit you 
> built how much differential in temperature did you require to achieve 
> the 20:1 COP?
>
> This research sounds so fantastic, the ultimate Stirling turbine,  why 
> did you stop working on the Tesla Turbine MVR system, had you built 
> the complete proof of concept prototype with the three different 
> refrigerants?  So much potential here mixing it with your thermocouple 
> Peltier harvesting concept!!!
>
> What would the cost of such a system to build these days, would most 
> of the system be available in off the shelf parts aside from the Tesla 
> Turbine?
>
> Your understanding of Don Smith was he looking for a natural high or a 
> low mag field to perturb or an area with both and a steep differential 
> nearby that could be modulated similar to flux switching a reluctance 
> motor?
>
>
>
>
> On 12/19/2018 9:33 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/19/2018 7:08 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> It is interesting the superlight and Russell concept is being proven 
>>> now with the super high magnetic fields from galactic centers.   Don 
>>> Smith had an interesting concept that we were sitting on so much 
>>> flux we were like birds on a line and could not measure it 
>>> objectively being in the middle of a maelstrom.    Seems to me the 
>>> mag particles and the plasma are inseparable as a universal driver, 
>>> kind of like lift and drag, or Lenz.  Ways to work around the 
>>> interplay with ionization or timing but the yin and yang of it 
>>> appear a standing requirement.
>>>
>>> Not being a biblical scholar or anything close but always thought 
>>> first was the word or logos let there be light hence could be 
>>> allegory for some scientific fact RF preceding the superlight. 
>>> Hahaha calls for conjecture bigtime.
>>>
>> I for one am not a big Biblical Scholar for sure but when hit over 
>> the head with solid evidence that there are forces and energy for 
>> which we, so far have no explanation, you just have to be the curious 
>> cat. Research. I spent some time with Don Smith and yes, his end game 
>> was to harness energy from the earth natural magnetic flux fields.  
>> His library of magnetic maps showing all the anomalies over the globe 
>> was enough evidence for me.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I like how your research is very factual and empirical, thanks!
>>>
>>> Also great illustrations from your experiments and I had wondered 
>>> about a hollow shaft, glad you tried it as it seems to correct some 
>>> potential flow issues with the eddys from the output ports and the 
>>> shaft "ground effects" "Burnelli" sorry don't know the proper term 
>>> for hydraulics flow along a surface.  Then finally with that hollow 
>>> shaft one can have the center of the vortex also. Quite excellent!
>>>
>> Mick, I studied everything about the Tesla Turbine and could not 
>> believe how misinformed everyone was regarding its operation. After 
>> studying Victor Schauberger implosion technology and the Repulsine 
>> Turbine, I employed the principles into the hollow shaft version to 
>> allow operation of turbine exhaust in a partial vacuum by running my 
>> condenser at 40 degree F. using the MVR technology with a heat 
>> scavenging refrigerant. The heat of evaporation (980 BTU/# water) is 
>> totally recovered in the condenser via refrigerant loop.  This makes 
>> the Tesla Turbine truly an Implosion Turbine.  The Internet sites 
>> like Germano etc. never got a grasp on Tesla's ingenuity>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> How come you did not become a Shriner, fees too high?
>>>
>>> On 12/19/2018 7:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal 
>>>> One, and studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the 
>>>> Biblical Story of creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief 
>>>> of the Creator of everything and it all came out of LIGHT. GOD 
>>>> said, let there be light,  that light was not the light that we are 
>>>> so familiar to.  In my opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which BTW is 
>>>> the fundamental particle flux of magnetism. It is Magneto-Electric 
>>>> and carries a powerful magnetic flux field along with the attendant 
>>>> electric fields. see
>>>>
>>>> On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in 
>>>>> your response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were 
>>>>> introduced at the same time or one before the other?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>>> Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>>>>>> Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
>>>>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>, 
>>>>>> Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, 
>>>>>> Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Angel Alvarez 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel 
>>>>>> mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm 
>>>>>> Thank You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC. 
>>>>>> I need all the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at 
>>>>>> the Tesla Tech Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation, 
>>>>>> Re-connect is certainly a current topic in the Scientific 
>>>>>> Community. The big question that has come to light is the 
>>>>>> emission of PARTICLES from annihilation of magnetic flux 
>>>>>> fields???   What are these super powerful particles? Interesting 
>>>>>> idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes of force) are actually a 
>>>>>> particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon with my experiments 
>>>>>> with the Neutral Spike and describe it as a Magneto-Electric 
>>>>>> event as John Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT doc.  Read 
>>>>>> the SLAC article very carefully and you will see that the 
>>>>>> emission of a particle flux out of black holes fall exactly 
>>>>>> aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of super-luminal velocities 
>>>>>> and super penetration energy like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>> Bert Pool sent this to me: 
>>>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of 
>>>>>>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the 
>>>>>>>>> phenomenon of EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will 
>>>>>>>>> be interested in page 34 (last page) on the production of 
>>>>>>>>> "plasmoids"!
>

Norm,

If you could provide a link to the refrigerant list this would be
helpful as the header info was jumbled in the email.

Sounds like you designed the Tesla Turbine to run from the phase change
of a refrigerant at high head pressure rather than water-steam, what are
the design parameters of the TT for differing viscosity or pressure
drivers such as a steam system vs good old R12, Ammonia or even Co2?  
Very interested in the differences in the disc spacing and nozzles
depending on pressures and types of "fuel"

What is the best surface to have on the disks for the energy transfer
polished or nano embossed?

How did you re-compress the vapor, what is best in efficiency here for
your low lift MVR a scroll compressor, screw etc.?

I could not find your info on the TT designing at the Tesla Tech website
so much there hard to search, I guess maybe I should call or email the
owner when I get back North.

On 12/20/2018 7:50 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Mick, Please understand that, in my lab I had all of the components
> for a stand alone home energy system employing all of the technology's
> that we discussed but I had a commitment to do the prototype machining
> and Proof of Concept presentation for the investor group from GAZPROM.
> The Implosion Vortex Hydrogen Generator took top priority. See 
> http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/7097676    US Patent, Process and
> device for producing hydrogen US 7097676 B2
>
> You mentioned the Peltier chips by Marlow Industries , I was salvaging
> out and selling about 100/Mo. of the large chips. I had boxes of them
> for research.  Power generation from the chips was dead nuts simple
> with just a temperature differential. With just 100 degree F
> differential you could get one watt per sq. inch of collector
> surface.  Far more power/ sq. meter than any solar photovoltaic panel.
>
> For low lift MVR, select your refrigerant so as to operate at highest
> pressures at lowest temperature differential. there is a wide choice
> here. You are condensing your driving vapor so almost all latent heat
> is recovered plus the sensible heat.  Your heat scavenging refrigerant
> is collecting heat from all sources including the ambient environment
> (latent heat from RH of air)  gray water source, ground water source,
> solar collectors (flat panel water heating panels), you name it. 
> Cascade concept of MVR lift insures a great COP. 
>
>
> *efrigerant
> No.*
>
> 	
>
> *Name*
>
> 	
>
> *Molecular Mass*
>
> 	
>
> *Boiling point
> at atmospheric pressure /14.7 psia, 1 bar abs/
> /(^o F)/*
>
> 	
>
> Freezing Point
> at atmospheric pressure
> /14.7 psia, 1 bar abs
> (^o F)/
>
> *Critical Point*
>
> *Temperature
> /(^o F)/*
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Pressure
> /(psia)/
>
> *Specific Volume
> /(Cu.Ft./lb.)/*
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-10
>
> 	
>
> Carbontetrachloride
>
> 	
>
> 153.8
>
> 	
>
> 170.2
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-11
>
> 	
>
> Trichlorofluoromethane^1)
>
> 	
>
> 137.37
>
> 	
>
> 74.9
>
> 	
>
> -168
>
> 	
>
> 388
>
> 	
>
> 640
>
> 	
>
> 0.0289
>
> R-12
> <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/dichlorodifluoromethane-R-12-d_972.html>
>
> 	
>
> Dichlorodifluoromethane
> <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/dichlorodifluoromethane-R-12-d_972.html>2)
>
> 	
>
> 120.91
>
> 	
>
> -21.8
>
> 	
>
> -252
>
> 	
>
> 234
>
> 	
>
> 597
>
> 	
>
> 0.0287
>
> R-13
>
> 	
>
> Monochlorotrifluoromethane
>
> 	
>
> 104.46
>
> 	
>
> -114.6
>
> 	
>
> -294
>
> 	
>
> 84
>
> 	
>
> 561
>
> 	
>
> 0.0277
>
> R-13B1
>
> 	
>
> Bromotrifluoromethane
>
> 	
>
> 148.91
>
> 	
>
> -72
>
> 	
>
> -270
>
> 	
>
> 153
>
> 	
>
> 575
>
> 	
>
> 0.0215
>
> R-14
>
> 	
>
> Tetrafluoromethane (Carbon tetrafluoride)
>
> 	
>
> 88.00
>
> 	
>
> -198.2
>
> 	
>
> -299
>
> 	
>
> -50
>
> 	
>
> 543
>
> 	
>
> 0.0256
>
> R-14
>
> 	
>
> Chloroform
>
> 	
>
> 119.4
>
> 	
>
> 142
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-21
>
> 	
>
> Dichloro-fluoromethane
>
> 	
>
> 102.92
>
> 	
>
> 48.1
>
> 	
>
> -211
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-22
>
> 	
>
> Difluoromonochloromethane^3)
>
> 	
>
> 86.468
>
> 	
>
> -41.3
>
> 	
>
> -256
>
> 	
>
> 205
>
> 	
>
> 722
>
> 	
>
> 0.0305
>
> R-23
>
> 	
>
> Trifluormethane
>
> 	
>
> 70
>
> 	
>
> -119.9
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-30
>
> 	
>
> Methylene Chloride
>
> 	
>
> 84.9
>
> 	
>
> 105.2
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-31
>
> 	
>
> Monochloromonofluoromethane
>
> 	
>
> 68.5
>
> 	
>
> 48.0
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-32
>
> 	
>
> Methylene Fluoride
>
> 	
>
> 52.0
>
> 	
>
> -61.4
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-40
>
> 	
>
> Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride)
>
> 	
>
> 50.488
>
> 	
>
> -10.7
>
> 	
>
> -144
>
> 	
>
> 290
>
> 	
>
> 969
>
> 	
>
> 0.0454
>
> R-41
>
> 	
>
> Methyl Fluoride
>
> 	
>
> 34.0
>
> 	
>
> -109
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-50
>
> 	
>
> Methane
>
> 	
>
> 16.044
>
> 	
>
> -259
>
> 	
>
> -296.6
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-110
>
> 	
>
> Hexachloroethane
>
> 	
>
> 236.8
>
> 	
>
> 365
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-111
>
> 	
>
> Pentachloromonofluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 220.3
>
> 	
>
> 279
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-112
>
> 	
>
> Tetrachlorodifluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 203.8
>
> 	
>
> 199.0
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-113
>
> 	
>
> Trichlorotrifluoroethane^4)
>
> 	
>
> 187.39
>
> 	
>
> 118
>
> 	
>
> -31
>
> 	
>
> 417
>
> 	
>
> 499
>
> 	
>
> 0.0278
>
> R-114
>
> 	
>
> 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 170.92
>
> 	
>
> 38.4
>
> 	
>
> -137
>
> 	
>
> 294
>
> 	
>
> 473
>
> 	
>
> 0.0275
>
> R-115
>
> 	
>
> Chloropentafluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 154.47
>
> 	
>
> -38.0
>
> 	
>
> -149
>
> 	
>
> 176
>
> 	
>
> 458
>
> 	
>
> 0.0261
>
> R-116
>
> 	
>
> Hexafluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 138.0
>
> 	
>
> -108.8
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-120
>
> 	
>
> Pentachloroethane
>
> 	
>
> 202.3
>
> 	
>
> 324
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-123
>
> 	
>
> Dichlorotrifluoroethane^5)
>
> 	
>
> 152.93
>
> 	
>
> 82
>
> 	
>
> -161
>
> 	
>
> 363
>
> 	
>
> 533
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-124
>
> 	
>
> Monochlorotetrafluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 136.5
>
> 	
>
> 10.4
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-125
>
> 	
>
> Pentafluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 120
>
> 	
>
> -55
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-133a
>
> 	
>
> Monochlorotrifluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 118.5
>
> 	
>
> 43.0
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-134a
>
> 	
>
> Tetrafluoroethane^6)
>
> 	
>
> 102.03
>
> 	
>
> -15
>
> 	
>
> -142
>
> 	
>
> 214
>
> 	
>
> 590
>
> 	
>
> 0.0290
>
> R-140a
>
> 	
>
> Trichloroethane
>
> 	
>
> 133.4
>
> 	
>
> 165
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-142b
>
> 	
>
> 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 100.50
>
> 	
>
> 14
>
> 	
>
> -204
>
> 	
>
> 279
>
> 	
>
> 598
>
> 	
>
> 0.0368
>
> R-143a
>
> 	
>
> Trifluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 84
>
> 	
>
> -53.5
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-150a
>
> 	

>
> Dichloroethane
>
> 	
>
> 98.9
>
> 	
>
> 140
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-152a
>
> 	
>
> Difluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 66.05
>
> 	
>
> -13
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-160
>
> 	
>
> Ethyl Chloride
>
> 	
>
> 64.515
>
> 	
>
> 12.2
>
> 	
>
> -218
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-170
>
> 	
>
> Ethane
>
> 	
>
> 30.070
>
> 	
>
> -127
>
> 	
>
> -278
>
> 	
>
> 90
>
> 	
>
> 710
>
> 	
>
> 0.0830
>
> R-218
>
> 	
>
> Octafluoropropane
>
> 	
>
> 188
>
> 	
>
> -36.4
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-290
>
> 	
>
> Propane
>
> 	
>
> 44.097
>
> 	
>
> -44
>
> 	
>
> -309.8
>
> 	
>
> 206
>
> 	
>
> 617
>
> 	
>
> 0.0728
>
> RC-318
>
> 	
>
> Octafluorocyclobutane
>
> 	
>
> 200.04
>
> 	
>
> 22
>
> 	
>
> -43
>
> 	
>
> 240
>
> 	
>
> 404
>
> 	
>
> 0.0258
>
> R-410A
>
> 	
>
> R-32 Difluoromethane (50% weight), R-125 Pentafluoroethane (50% weight)
>
> 	
>
> 72.6
>
> 	
>
> -55.4
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
> 162
>
> 	
>
> 690
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-500
>
> 	
>
> Dichlorodifluoromethane/
> Difluoroethane^7)
>
> 	
>
> 99.31
>
> 	
>
> -28
>
> 	
>
> -254
>
> 	
>
> 222
>
> 	
>
> 642
>
> 	
>
> 0.0323
>
> R-502
>
> 	
>
> Chlorodifluoromethane/
> Chloropentafluoroethane
>
> 	
>
> 111.63
>
> 	
>
> -50
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
> 180
>
> 	
>
> 591
>
> 	
>
> 0.0286
>
> R-503
>
> 	
>
> Chlorotrifluoromethane/
> Trifluoromethane
>
> 	
>
> 87.50
>
> 	
>
> -128
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
> 67
>
> 	
>
> 607
>
> 	
>
> 0.0326
>
> R-600
>
> 	
>
> n-Butane
>
> 	
>
> 58.12
>
> 	
>
> 31.2
>
> 	
>
> -217
>
> 	
>
> 306
>
> 	
>
> 551
>
> 	
>
> 0.0702
>
> R-600a
>
> 	
>
> Isobutane (2-Methyl propane)
>
> 	
>
> 58.12
>
> 	
>
> 10.8
>
> 	
>
> -229
>
> 	
>
> 275
>
> 	
>
> 529
>
> 	
>
> 0.0725
>
> R-611
>
> 	
>
> Methyl formate
>
> 	
>
> 60.05
>
> 	
>
> 89
>
> 	
>
> -146
>
> 	
>
> 417
>
> 	
>
> 870
>
> 	
>
> 0.0459
>
> R-702
>
> 	
>
> Hydrogen
>
> 	
>
> 2.016
>
> 	
>
> -423
>
> 	
>
> -434.6
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-704
>
> 	
>
> Helium
>
> 	
>
> 4.0026
>
> 	
>
> -452
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-717 <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ammonia-d_971.html>
>
> 	
>
> Ammonia <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ammonia-d_971.html>
>
> 	
>
> 17.02
>
> 	
>
> -28
>
> 	
>
> -107.9
>
> 	
>
> 271
>
> 	
>
> 1657
>
> 	
>
> 0.0680
>
> R-720
>
> 	
>
> Neon
>
> 	
>
> 20.179
>
> 	
>
> -410.9
>
> 	
>
> -415.6
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-728
>
> 	
>
> Nitrogen
>
> 	
>
> 28.0134
>
> 	
>
> -320.4
>
> 	
>
> -346
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-729
>
> 	
>
> Air
>
> 	
>
> 28.966
>
> 	
>
> -320
>
> 	
>
> -357.2
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-732
>
> 	
>
> Oxygen
>
> 	
>
> 31.9988
>
> 	
>
> -297.3
>
> 	
>
> -361.3
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-740
>
> 	
>
> Argon
>
> 	
>
> 39.948
>
> 	
>
> -303
>
> 	
>
> -308.5
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-744
>
> 	
>
> Carbon Dioxide
>
> 	
>
> 44.01
>
> 	
>
> -109.4
>
> 	
>
> -70
>
> 	
>
> 88
>
> 	
>
> 1070
>
> 	
>
> 0.0342
>
> R-744A
>
> 	
>
> Nitrous Oxide
>
> 	
>
> 44.012
>
> 	
>
> -127.3
>
> 	
>
> -131.5
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> 	
>
>  
>
> R-764
>
> 	
>
> Sulfur Dioxide
>
> 	
>
> 64.06
>
> 	
>
> 14.0
>
> 	
>
> -104
>
> 	
>
> 316
>
> 	
>
> 1143
>
> 	
>
> 0.0306
>
> R-1150
>
> 	
>
> Ethylene
>
> 	
>
> 28.05
>
> 	
>
> -155
>
> 	
>
> -272
>
> 	
>
> 49
>
> 	
>
> 742
>
> 	
>
> 0.0700
>
>
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
>
>  
>
>
> On 12/19/2018 6:53 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>  
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> In your closed cycle MVR system based on the size of the unit you
>> built how much differential in temperature did you require to achieve
>> the 20:1 COP?
>>
>> This research sounds so fantastic, the ultimate Stirling turbine, 
>> why did you stop working on the Tesla Turbine MVR system, had you
>> built the complete proof of concept prototype with the three
>> different refrigerants?  So much potential here mixing it with your
>> thermocouple Peltier harvesting concept!!!
>>
>> What would the cost of such a system to build these days, would most
>> of the system be available in off the shelf parts aside from the
>> Tesla Turbine?
>>
>> Your understanding of Don Smith was he looking for a natural high or
>> a low mag field to perturb or an area with both and a steep
>> differential nearby that could be modulated similar to flux switching
>> a reluctance motor?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/19/2018 9:33 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/19/2018 7:08 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Norm,
>>>>
>>>> It is interesting the superlight and Russell concept is being
>>>> proven now with the super high magnetic fields from galactic
>>>> centers.   Don Smith had an interesting concept that we were
>>>> sitting on so much flux we were like birds on a line and could not
>>>> measure it objectively being in the middle of a maelstrom.    Seems
>>>> to me the mag particles and the plasma are inseparable as a
>>>> universal driver, kind of like lift and drag, or Lenz.  Ways to
>>>> work around the interplay with ionization or timing but the yin and
>>>> yang of it appear a standing requirement.
>>>>
>>>> Not being a biblical scholar or anything close but always thought
>>>> first was the word or logos let there be light hence could be
>>>> allegory for some scientific fact RF preceding the superlight. 
>>>> Hahaha calls for conjecture bigtime.
>>>>
>>> I for one am not a big Biblical Scholar for sure but when hit over
>>> the head with solid evidence that there are forces and energy for
>>> which we, so far have no explanation, you just have to be the
>>> curious cat.  Research. I spent some time with Don Smith and yes,
>>> his end game was to harness energy from the earth natural magnetic
>>> flux fields.  His library of magnetic maps showing all the anomalies
>>> over the globe was enough evidence for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I like how your research is very factual and empirical, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Also great illustrations from your experiments and I had wondered
>>>> about a hollow shaft, glad you tried it as it seems to correct some
>>>> potential flow issues with the eddys from the output ports and the
>>>> shaft "ground effects" "Burnelli" sorry don't know the proper term
>>>> for hydraulics flow along a surface.  Then finally with that hollow
>>>> shaft one can have the center of the vortex also.  Quite excellent!
>>>>
>>> Mick, I studied everything about the Tesla Turbine and could not
>>> believe how misinformed everyone was regarding its operation. After
>>> studying Victor Schauberger implosion technology and the Repulsine
>>> Turbine, I employed the principles into the hollow shaft version to
>>> allow operation of turbine exhaust in a partial vacuum by running my
>>> condenser at 40 degree F. using the MVR technology with a heat
>>> scavenging refrigerant. The heat of evaporation (980 BTU/# water) is
>>> totally recovered in the condenser via refrigerant loop.  This makes
>>> the Tesla Turbine truly an Implosion Turbine.  The Internet sites
>>> like Germano etc. never got a grasp on Tesla's ingenuity>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> How come you did not become a Shriner, fees too high?
>>>>
>>>> On 12/19/2018 7:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal
>>>>> One, and studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the
>>>>> Biblical Story of creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief
>>>>> of the Creator of everything and it all came out of LIGHT.   GOD
>>>>> said, let there be light,  that light was not the light that we
>>>>> are so familiar to.  In my opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which
>>>>> BTW is the fundamental particle flux of magnetism. It is
>>>>> Magneto-Electric and carries a powerful magnetic flux field along
>>>>> with the attendant electric fields. see
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in
>>>>>> your response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were
>>>>>> introduced at the same time or one before the other?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>>>> Subject: 	Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>>>>>>> Date: 	Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
>>>>>>> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> To: 	[email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>> Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby
>>>>>>> Grotz <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Angel
>>>>>>> Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel
>>>>>>> mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm
>>>>>>> Thank You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC.
>>>>>>> I need all the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at
>>>>>>> the Tesla Tech Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation,
>>>>>>> Re-connect is certainly a current topic in the Scientific
>>>>>>> Community. The big question that has come to light is the
>>>>>>> emission of PARTICLES from annihilation of magnetic flux
>>>>>>> fields???   What are these super powerful particles? Interesting
>>>>>>> idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes of force) are actually a
>>>>>>> particle flux flow.  I saw this phenomenon with my experiments
>>>>>>> with the Neutral Spike and describe it as a Magneto-Electric
>>>>>>> event as John Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT doc.  Read
>>>>>>> the SLAC article very carefully and you will see that the
>>>>>>> emission of a particle flux out of black holes fall exactly
>>>>>>> aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of super-luminal velocities
>>>>>>> and super penetration energy like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bert Pool sent this to me:
>>>>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of
>>>>>>>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> See: attached doc.  Best I have found to explain the
>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon of EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you
>>>>>>>>>> will be interested in page 34 (last page) on the production
>>>>>>>>>> of "plasmoids"!
>

Hi George
 I have had a little bit of contact with your friend Jesus, as when my very best friend (bass player for the fuckedtones, Mit Geary) died (took a speedball heroin and cocaine mix) I was crying as felt it was my fault a lot since had cut him off and would not answer his calls and such since he was smoking heroin pretty bad and figured I should just cut him off as punishment this was about 13 years ago...
 Anyways I said a prayer to Jesus and got a return message as clear as day:
 "thank you for thinking of me" That was all, but I think this is "how he works!"...
 

 Also I was at a church once with very fat and loud  bombastic black preacher and I was forced to sit through his sermon...he really threw me the wrong way, his message was there was a common phrase everyone uses to say what it is Jesus said, but in fact this common phrase (cant remember exactly what it is now) was never actually written in bible....so that was his point, like he discovered and revealed this fact, but to me it is so stupid, as so what? 
 Does something have to be written into bible to be real and fact?? Of course not, there are a million facts and things without doubt REAL and truth not written within bible at all....so this was revelation to me, (given to me by black preacher I considered an idiot in sheeps clothing haha)  
 as when the "bible-thumpers" quote bible, they also will imply its in the bible and (sometimes) actual quotes and  words of Jesus or God  so therefore it must be real, but in fact it is just as real or real as everything NOT written in bible!!  So all the things Jesus or God DO NOT say, is just as real and truth as what they do say (at least what certain people will translate and interpret they say) This is important I think as also it opens up other religious teachings and philosophies such as Hindu and Muslim and Buddhist for examples which are not anything to fear AT ALL  and all this  is a very simple teaching of Jesus given to me.
 Kone

Doug,
I don't think you got the point that I was tying to make about false religion being destroyed by God. False religion is described in the Bible under the name of Babylon the Great.

Satan the Devil runs all the political systems and all the religions, they all belong to him, and all the religions are bundled together under the name of Babylon the Great, the mother of the harlots and of the disgusting things of the earth. 'And the woman whom you saw means the great city that has a kingdom over the kings of the earth'.
Rev. 18: 2,4 He cried out with a strong voice saying: She has fallen........And I heard another voice out of heaven say: "Get out of her, my people, if you do not want to share with her in her sins, and if you do not want to receive part of her plagues."
When the UN gets control of the earth soon, God will cause all the political rulers to give their power and authority to the UN to destroy every trace of false religion from the face of the earth.
The way I see it, is that there will be millions, maybe billions of army/service personnel from every country wearing blue UN hats and they will have one task and that is to destroy all religious buildings, trinkets, statues, rosary beads, prayer flags, photos, jewelry, clothing with religious things on them, even family photos with a church cross or crucifix in the photo.  There will not be left the slightest trace of anything religious on the earth. If it has a cross on it will be destroyed. Libraries will need to emptied of anything religious.

This will be very far reaching and all books that have something religious in them will need to be burned.
All music and songs with religious words will need to be destroyed.  All hard drives will have something on them perhaps and they will have to be destroyed.

Sorry George... the UN is an instrument of our controllers.
 

 Agenda 21, UN 2030 agenda, etc
 

 Ron

Ron,
The UN will be the 8th world power and God will put his one thought into the hearts and minds of the political rulers to carry out their own one thought to destroy Babylon the Great, Satan the Devil's world empire of false religion.
The world political rulers will believe it is their own thought to carry out the destruction of false religion and they will give their power and authority to the UN to do this.
The seven world powers that have gone before this are: The Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Medo-Persians, Greeks, Romans and Anglo Americans. The UN will be an 8th world power but it springs from or is made up from the other seven world powers.
The Elite want the UN to be the one world government by 2030 or sooner.

There is not a long time for this to be proved one way or the other so just keep your eye on things to see how wrong I am.
George

    On Friday, 21 December 2018, 2:32:07 pm AEDT, [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:  
 
     


Sorry George... the UN is an instrument of our controllers.
Agenda 21, UN 2030 agenda, etc
Ron