Body
Mick, Please understand that, in my lab I had all of the components for
a stand alone home energy system employing all of the technology's that
we discussed but I had a commitment to do the prototype machining and
Proof of Concept presentation for the investor group from GAZPROM. The
Implosion Vortex Hydrogen Generator took top priority. See
http://www.patentbuddy.com/Patent/7097676 US Patent, Process and
device for producing hydrogen US 7097676 B2
You mentioned the Peltier chips by Marlow Industries , I was salvaging
out and selling about 100/Mo. of the large chips. I had boxes of them
for research. Power generation from the chips was dead nuts simple with
just a temperature differential. With just 100 degree F differential you
could get one watt per sq. inch of collector surface. Far more power/
sq. meter than any solar photovoltaic panel.
For low lift MVR, select your refrigerant so as to operate at highest
pressures at lowest temperature differential. there is a wide choice
here. You are condensing your driving vapor so almost all latent heat is
recovered plus the sensible heat. Your heat scavenging refrigerant is
collecting heat from all sources including the ambient environment
(latent heat from RH of air) gray water source, ground water source,
solar collectors (flat panel water heating panels), you name it.
Cascade concept of MVR lift insures a great COP.
*efrigerant
No.*
*Name*
*Molecular Mass*
*Boiling point
at atmospheric pressure /14.7 psia, 1 bar abs/
/(^o F)/*
Freezing Point
at atmospheric pressure
/14.7 psia, 1 bar abs
(^o F)/
*Critical Point*
*Temperature
/(^o F)/*
Pressure
/(psia)/
*Specific Volume
/(Cu.Ft./lb.)/*
R-10
Carbontetrachloride
153.8
170.2
R-11
Trichlorofluoromethane^1)
137.37
74.9
-168
388
640
0.0289
R-12
<https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/dichlorodifluoromethane-R-12-d_972.html>
Dichlorodifluoromethane
<https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/dichlorodifluoromethane-R-12-d_972.html>2)
120.91
-21.8
-252
234
597
0.0287
R-13
Monochlorotrifluoromethane
104.46
-114.6
-294
84
561
0.0277
R-13B1
Bromotrifluoromethane
148.91
-72
-270
153
575
0.0215
R-14
Tetrafluoromethane (Carbon tetrafluoride)
88.00
-198.2
-299
-50
543
0.0256
R-14
Chloroform
119.4
142
R-21
Dichloro-fluoromethane
102.92
48.1
-211
R-22
Difluoromonochloromethane^3)
86.468
-41.3
-256
205
722
0.0305
R-23
Trifluormethane
70
-119.9
R-30
Methylene Chloride
84.9
105.2
R-31
Monochloromonofluoromethane
68.5
48.0
R-32
Methylene Fluoride
52.0
-61.4
R-40
Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride)
50.488
-10.7
-144
290
969
0.0454
R-41
Methyl Fluoride
34.0
-109
R-50
Methane
16.044
-259
-296.6
R-110
Hexachloroethane
236.8
365
R-111
Pentachloromonofluoroethane
220.3
279
R-112
Tetrachlorodifluoroethane
203.8
199.0
R-113
Trichlorotrifluoroethane^4)
187.39
118
-31
417
499
0.0278
R-114
1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane
170.92
38.4
-137
294
473
0.0275
R-115
Chloropentafluoroethane
154.47
-38.0
-149
176
458
0.0261
R-116
Hexafluoroethane
138.0
-108.8
R-120
Pentachloroethane
202.3
324
R-123
Dichlorotrifluoroethane^5)
152.93
82
-161
363
533
R-124
Monochlorotetrafluoroethane
136.5
10.4
R-125
Pentafluoroethane
120
-55
R-133a
Monochlorotrifluoroethane
118.5
43.0
R-134a
Tetrafluoroethane^6)
102.03
-15
-142
214
590
0.0290
R-140a
Trichloroethane
133.4
165
R-142b
1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane
100.50
14
-204
279
598
0.0368
R-143a
Trifluoroethane
84
-53.5
R-150a
Dichloroethane
98.9
140
R-152a
Difluoroethane
66.05
-13
R-160
Ethyl Chloride
64.515
12.2
-218
R-170
Ethane
30.070
-127
-278
90
710
0.0830
R-218
Octafluoropropane
188
-36.4
R-290
Propane
44.097
-44
-309.8
206
617
0.0728
RC-318
Octafluorocyclobutane
200.04
22
-43
240
404
0.0258
R-410A
R-32 Difluoromethane (50% weight), R-125 Pentafluoroethane (50% weight)
72.6
-55.4
162
690
R-500
Dichlorodifluoromethane/
Difluoroethane^7)
99.31
-28
-254
222
642
0.0323
R-502
Chlorodifluoromethane/
Chloropentafluoroethane
111.63
-50
180
591
0.0286
R-503
Chlorotrifluoromethane/
Trifluoromethane
87.50
-128
67
607
0.0326
R-600
n-Butane
58.12
31.2
-217
306
551
0.0702
R-600a
Isobutane (2-Methyl propane)
58.12
10.8
-229
275
529
0.0725
R-611
Methyl formate
60.05
89
-146
417
870
0.0459
R-702
Hydrogen
2.016
-423
-434.6
R-704
Helium
4.0026
-452
R-717 <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ammonia-d_971.html>
Ammonia <https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ammonia-d_971.html>
17.02
-28
-107.9
271
1657
0.0680
R-720
Neon
20.179
-410.9
-415.6
R-728
Nitrogen
28.0134
-320.4
-346
R-729
Air
28.966
-320
-357.2
R-732
Oxygen
31.9988
-297.3
-361.3
R-740
Argon
39.948
-303
-308.5
R-744
Carbon Dioxide
44.01
-109.4
-70
88
1070
0.0342
R-744A
Nitrous Oxide
44.012
-127.3
-131.5
R-764
Sulfur Dioxide
64.06
14.0
-104
316
1143
0.0306
R-1150
Ethylene
28.05
-155
-272
49
742
0.0700
On 12/19/2018 6:53 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> In your closed cycle MVR system based on the size of the unit you
> built how much differential in temperature did you require to achieve
> the 20:1 COP?
>
> This research sounds so fantastic, the ultimate Stirling turbine, why
> did you stop working on the Tesla Turbine MVR system, had you built
> the complete proof of concept prototype with the three different
> refrigerants? So much potential here mixing it with your thermocouple
> Peltier harvesting concept!!!
>
> What would the cost of such a system to build these days, would most
> of the system be available in off the shelf parts aside from the Tesla
> Turbine?
>
> Your understanding of Don Smith was he looking for a natural high or a
> low mag field to perturb or an area with both and a steep differential
> nearby that could be modulated similar to flux switching a reluctance
> motor?
>
>
>
>
> On 12/19/2018 9:33 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/19/2018 7:08 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> It is interesting the superlight and Russell concept is being proven
>>> now with the super high magnetic fields from galactic centers. Don
>>> Smith had an interesting concept that we were sitting on so much
>>> flux we were like birds on a line and could not measure it
>>> objectively being in the middle of a maelstrom. Seems to me the
>>> mag particles and the plasma are inseparable as a universal driver,
>>> kind of like lift and drag, or Lenz. Ways to work around the
>>> interplay with ionization or timing but the yin and yang of it
>>> appear a standing requirement.
>>>
>>> Not being a biblical scholar or anything close but always thought
>>> first was the word or logos let there be light hence could be
>>> allegory for some scientific fact RF preceding the superlight.
>>> Hahaha calls for conjecture bigtime.
>>>
>> I for one am not a big Biblical Scholar for sure but when hit over
>> the head with solid evidence that there are forces and energy for
>> which we, so far have no explanation, you just have to be the curious
>> cat. Research. I spent some time with Don Smith and yes, his end game
>> was to harness energy from the earth natural magnetic flux fields.
>> His library of magnetic maps showing all the anomalies over the globe
>> was enough evidence for me.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I like how your research is very factual and empirical, thanks!
>>>
>>> Also great illustrations from your experiments and I had wondered
>>> about a hollow shaft, glad you tried it as it seems to correct some
>>> potential flow issues with the eddys from the output ports and the
>>> shaft "ground effects" "Burnelli" sorry don't know the proper term
>>> for hydraulics flow along a surface. Then finally with that hollow
>>> shaft one can have the center of the vortex also. Quite excellent!
>>>
>> Mick, I studied everything about the Tesla Turbine and could not
>> believe how misinformed everyone was regarding its operation. After
>> studying Victor Schauberger implosion technology and the Repulsine
>> Turbine, I employed the principles into the hollow shaft version to
>> allow operation of turbine exhaust in a partial vacuum by running my
>> condenser at 40 degree F. using the MVR technology with a heat
>> scavenging refrigerant. The heat of evaporation (980 BTU/# water) is
>> totally recovered in the condenser via refrigerant loop. This makes
>> the Tesla Turbine truly an Implosion Turbine. The Internet sites
>> like Germano etc. never got a grasp on Tesla's ingenuity>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> How come you did not become a Shriner, fees too high?
>>>
>>> On 12/19/2018 7:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mick, Yes, I bought the entire Walter Russell course, Universal
>>>> One, and studied his fundamental beliefs which followed the
>>>> Biblical Story of creation in Genius One. Walter had a firm belief
>>>> of the Creator of everything and it all came out of LIGHT. GOD
>>>> said, let there be light, that light was not the light that we are
>>>> so familiar to. In my opinion it was the SUPER LIGHT which BTW is
>>>> the fundamental particle flux of magnetism. It is Magneto-Electric
>>>> and carries a powerful magnetic flux field along with the attendant
>>>> electric fields. see
>>>>
>>>> On 12/17/2018 5:16 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> I know this question calls for speculation but I am interested in
>>>>> your response, you having been a student of Walter Russell
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think the magnetic and electric sides of the universe were
>>>>> introduced at the same time or one before the other?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/17/2018 8:38 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:l
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Neutral Spike, Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 06:04:41 -0600
>>>>>> From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: [email protected], Bert Pool <[email protected]>,
>>>>>> Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>,
>>>>>> Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Angel Alvarez
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, joel
>>>>>> mcclain <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry
>>>>>> <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181213131242.htm
>>>>>> Thank You Bert Pool for this very informative article from SLAC.
>>>>>> I need all the info I can find to prepare for my presentation at
>>>>>> the Tesla Tech Conference. The subject of Magnetic Annihilation,
>>>>>> Re-connect is certainly a current topic in the Scientific
>>>>>> Community. The big question that has come to light is the
>>>>>> emission of PARTICLES from annihilation of magnetic flux
>>>>>> fields??? What are these super powerful particles? Interesting
>>>>>> idea that magnetic flux lines (tubes of force) are actually a
>>>>>> particle flux flow. I saw this phenomenon with my experiments
>>>>>> with the Neutral Spike and describe it as a Magneto-Electric
>>>>>> event as John Mileweski theorized in the SUPER LIGHT doc. Read
>>>>>> the SLAC article very carefully and you will see that the
>>>>>> emission of a particle flux out of black holes fall exactly
>>>>>> aligned with the SUPER LIGHT theory of super-luminal velocities
>>>>>> and super penetration energy like neutrinos and cosmic rays.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/7/2018 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>> Bert Pool sent this to me:
>>>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181203101417.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/6/2018 6:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is about as up-to-date as I can get on the subject of
>>>>>>>> re-connect theories. The 3rd doc. is dated 5 Dec. 2018
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1470943-biermann-battery-mediated-magnetic-reconnection-colliding-plasmas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.pppl.gov/news/2018/10/surprise-finding-discovering-previously-unknown-role-source-magnetic-fields
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2018-12-universe-theory-percent-cosmos.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/5/2018 4:16 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> See: attached doc. Best I have found to explain the
>>>>>>>>> phenomenon of EMP, flux annihilation-reconnect. Moray you will
>>>>>>>>> be interested in page 34 (last page) on the production of
>>>>>>>>> "plasmoids"!
>