Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] General info!
3
messages
·
2018-07-10T07:24:07-05:00
→
2018-07-10T10:01:40+00:00
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →
[1/3] Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] General info!
2018-07-10T07:24:07-05:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/peltier-chip.html Thay, I have had an account with Alibaba for many years and have ordered sample quantities of items from them. I really don"t know what the difference is between the refrigeration and generator chips. May be something in the semi-conductor material used. Alibaba is the cheapest source of the Peltier Junctions that I have found. I got a ton of the Marlow Ind. chips via salvage of Medical equipment and main frame computer systems. Regarding the black body solar panels, please go back and read the various articles that I have posed on my research. Recent break through on black body technology is fantastic. The latest from Industry is a total efficiency of greater than 99 percent absorptive! Thay! do your homework and read all the references to get the whole picture! https://www.aremco.com/news-item/new-hie-coat-840-c-high-temp-black-body-coating-offered/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body Long, long ago I read an interesting article regarding the behavior of infrared radiation and quickly picked up on the fact that photons in the infrared / far-infrared region of light cannot penetrate a collector glazing at acute angles. 45 degrees or less. A black body surface is a near perfect receptor as well as a near perfect emmiter of photons. Proof of this is the fact that you can make ice on a clear sky over desert with a black body emmiter. The radiation into space of the IR band photons leave the surface in a gross negative state thereby creating temperatures below freezing. (Read my article What is Heat) The secret is in ionization phenomenon. Now let's look at the powerful ionization rays of full spectrum sun light. When the sunlight penetrates the glazing of your solar collector and strikes your black body receptor surface ,said surface becomes ionized gross positive due to photon re-emmision in the far infrared and infrared spectrum. The preponderance of this re-emmision from the black body surface is at 90 degrees to the surface. Hmmm. Now understanding that the infrared spectrum cannot penetrate the glazing (re-emmision, you just make your collector surface into 90 degree trouths ( so that re-emmission is at a 45 degree angle to underside glazing angle of incidence. A quarter silvered tempered glazing is real important here. The collector is super efficient when you encase the whole thing in thermal foam to prevent heat losses due to overall collector heating. The unit that I built was a zeolyte based collector and the super thermal efficient design sent the operating temperatures over 200 degrees and shattered the glazing. The collector back plane was made from a 4ft. X 8ft. sheet of mild steel bent in a metal break with 8 inch wide 90 degree troughs which gave me a IR re-emmision angle of incidence of 45 degrees (perponderence) You have now cut your losses of energy to the lowest possible. The application of the Peltier chip coating (array) to the front side and circulating cooling water or air to the backside of collector plane will give you more than 100 degree thermal differential across the chips thus yielding a very efficient overall collector. 10X greater output over photovoltaic collectors. Sure the cost is much greater but good investment. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_internal_reflection https://physics.ucf.edu/~rep/publications/JournalPubs2010/ClearyGrating2010.pdf On 1/16/2016 10:06 AM, Norman wrote: PS: Natural infrared Sunlight, at an effective temperature of 5,780 kelvins, is composed of nearly thermal-spectrum radiation that is slightly more than half infrared. At zenith, sunlight provides an irradiance <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irradiance>of just over 1 kilowatt <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt>per square meter at sea level. Of this energy, 527 watts is infrared radiation, 445 watts is visible light <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_light>, and 32 watts is ultraviolet <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet>radiation.^[10] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#cite_note-10> On the surface of Earth, at far lower temperatures than the surface of the Sun, almost all thermal radiation consists of infrared in various wavelengths. Of these natural thermal radiation processes only lightning and natural fires are hot enough to produce much visible energy, and fires produce far more infrared than visible-light energy. If you are going to collect it you have to know what you are dealing with! On 1/16/2016 10:01 AM, Norman wrote: Back in the "day" 1996 when we were doing the "Elemental Replication/ "holy water" experiments, the two Texas Instruments Chemist present told of how they created a "black-body absorber" by acid etch burning of hard chrome that produced a "blackest black" that you will ever see. Totally absorbed all light with no re-emission at all. This really "intrigued me for I was designing a very special "flat plate" solar collector, the design of which no one had thought of! The design of a collector that has "zero" re-emission means that you capture all of the solar influx energy with practically no loss back to the atmosphere other than the modest heating of the surrounding housing material. If you are interested in the possibility of a Peltier Junction Collector, it is wise to read the following document. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/31267.pdf There are other "tricks of the trade" which most "solar guys" are not aware of. Of course you cannot even think of designing "the perfect collector" without reading and totally understanding the subject of absorption/ re-emission. Best start is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared "Enjoy"! Norm On 1/15/2016 1:46 PM, Norman wrote: Moray! Here is a rundown on the use of the Peltier Junction Chips from back in the 60s. See; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_Electric_Boatwhere large 8 ton capable solid state cooling (very compact) units were used on all the nuclear submarines since they had plenty of power available and these units took up very little room. ( I have numerous photos) Second generation computers and electronics used them for the obvious reasons due to compactness. Salvaging out of this old technology was done to recover the tons of 6061 extruded cooling and heating finned sinks. The Peltier chips went into a bin where I got thousands of them for the taking. I sold them for a buck apiece to my friend at B.G. Micro here in Dallas for he had customers waiting to get there hands on them. The wholesale price to Industry was at the time about $7.00 for the large 3 sq inch chip. The small chips were about $5.00. If the Electric Boat Engineers had known about the "reverse" process, they would have bonded via heat sinking putty the array of chips directly to the "cold" outer hull of the submarines and supplied a volume of steam to the hot side to deliver a tremendous amount of electric power from the vast area of the metal hull. "Just saying"! Lol To answer your question, since there is such a tremendous output/ sq. meter the Peltier solar panels would be well worth the investment. There are many ways to get the needed "heat differential" of which I can see your "brain massaging as I write this"! Since the chip construction is mostly ceramic & metal alloy construction, they can take a heat input much greater than I used and would give many times the power output. I can envision the development of a panel of similar dimensions as the solar panel with a continuous laminated membrane of the required semiconductor component to provide approximately 10 kw from 1X2 meter surface collector operating at 180 degrees under the glazing glass. Ground cool sinks could provide the cooling water at near ambient temperatures! "Dead Nuts" simple! Norm Roughly figuring, even using the Marlow Peltier large chips @ 3 sq, in. (1550 sq, in. / meter sq.) = 516 chips x $5 = $2583 for a yield of greater than 655 watts/ meter sq. Ain't shabby! On 1/14/2016 9:59 PM, Mbking42 wrote: Norm, That is creative! A Peltier junction solar heat to electricity converter. How cheap can an array of such junctions be made? Would it be significantly cheaper than today's solar panels? Good idea, Norm! -Moray -----Original Message----- From: Norman <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> To: Mbking42 <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; jongen422 <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; jerrrysmith <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; jsstone05 <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> Cc: jdecker <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; patrickgbailey <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; mleclair <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 8:38 am Subject: Re: Vortex cavitation energy Moray! "total agreement" here! Here is something to "ponder"! While studying Victor Schauberger's Implosion Vortex which I incorporated into my Patent of the Hydrogen Generator, I naturally had to understand the complex Hilsch tube vortex generator and how through "ion separation" at tremendous rotational velocities of over a million rpm caused the more dense, negative ionized air to migrate to the core discharge and exit as sub zero flow while the "positive ionized air swirled with high heat gain and exit at the hot air discharge port creating a mass flow proportion of 75% cold air discharge compared to a 25% hot air discharge. Heat differential ( this device) 40 degree F. cold air vs 270 degree hot air discharge from an input of 25 CFM @ 100 PSI, 100 degree F. air. Different devices produce much colder and greater differentials. Now when you consider that a "plasmoid" is a, "As you just pointed out", "A poloidal rotation closing into a toroidal rotation, a spiral closing on itself". I perceive the rapidly rotating plasma toroidal ball as a complex implosion vortex (multiples) with a core of heavily "negative ionized particles" with an outer mantle of highly ionized "positive" particles. The infolding super high speed rotation causes the "charge separation. The "positive" outer mantle give the appearance of a "positive" event when in reality the core is "Negative". and more dense. The implosion vortex proves this to be true. Please give the following some thought! Back in the early 90s I wrote a small piece on my ideas as to "What is Heat"??? I posted this to KeelNet with no response. Since I was doing a lot of salvage work on 1st & 2nd generation computer equipment I was able to accumulate hundreds of Peltier Cooling Chips which are manufactured by Marlow Industries here in Dallas. If you can provide a DC current across this device and get "ion separation", a hot side and a cold side. it would be 'logical" (as Spock would say) to assume that a temperature differential across a junction device like this will yield a DC current @ a given voltage i.e. wattage output. BTW, all of this was posted to the KeelyNet after I performed the experiment with "no comments"! I carefully set up a "hot" sink of heated water pumped through a copper block (hot side) and a "cold"" sink, with normal tap water flowing through a copper block on cold side! Here are the results of the Peltier Junction Chip output. Peltier Junction, small chip, 1.25" X 1.25" = 1.5625 sq." I used several different heat/cold differentials to provide a wattage output graph. 116 F. - 65 F. = 51 F. differential = .35 A @ .63 VDC = .22 watts 119 F. - 63 F. = 56 F. differential = .40 A @ .69 VDC = .276 watts 158 F. - 63 F. = 95 F. differential = .70 A @ 1.21 VDC = .847 watts 163 F. - 62 F. = 101 F. differential = .80 A @ 1.29 VDC = 1.03 watts Peltier Junction, large chip, 1.75" X 1.75" = 3.06 sq" 127 F. - 65 F. = 62 F. differential = .80 A @ .62 VDC = .496 watts 134 F. - 63 F. = 71 F. differential = .90 A @ .70 VDC = .63 watts 142 F. - 63 F. = 79 F. differential = 1.0 A @ .76 VDC = .76 watts 150 F. - 63 F. = 87 F. differential = 1.2 A @ .86 VDC = 1.03 watts 157 F. - 62 F. = 95 F. differential = 1.22 A @! .93 VDC = 1.13 watts 162 F. - 62 F. = 100 F. differential = 1.35 A @ 1.0 VDC = 1.35 watts Now consider that the "accepted" solar heat influx, full daytime sunlight is approximately one kilowatt / square meter. Photovoltaic solar collectors are just breaking the 10% efficiencies of converting the solar input into electrical output which means that they are achieving approximately 100 watts per square meter of collector surface. From the above Pelteir Junction table you can do a quick calculation and realize that the output is vastly superior to solar! The small chip puts out .659 watts / square inch X 1550 square inches / square meter = 1021.765 watts / square meter @ 101 F. differential. The large chip puts out .44 watts / square inch @ a temperature differential of 100 F. yielding (1550 square inches / square meter) 683.8 watts / meter square. Quite a difference compared to the 100 watts / square meter for solar collectors. Any heat source with an attendant cold sink can provide electric power via Peltier Junction far superior to solar cells. Flat plate collectors in direct sunlight can achieve collector temperatures close to 180 F. so with a cold sink maintained by ambient temp water you can greatly outperform standard solar collection performance. I think "Spock" would agree! My ideas as to just "What is Heat"! Crude by thought provocative! Norm What is Heat #2 For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of heating and cooling associated with the phase change of liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My line of thinking really took off back when I experimented with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most people do not understand how these devices move thermal energy through a current flow across a semiconductor junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist, Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier discovered that when a direct current was applied to two dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then melted when the polarity of the direct current was reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100 years because of the unavailability of semiconductor materials which could provide the wide temperature differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became available which revived the electric cooling principles.In the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a small temperature differential across the device a weak current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing the differential provided a proportional increase in current and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of how electron flow could move thermal energy across the junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly reversible situation based on polarity. Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase change material such as water and refrigerants.We have always been led to believe that evaporating water provided cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840 Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with the electrical output resulting from the steam friction passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s) Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or gain electrons in the process which accounts for the discrepancy in the energy equation when a material transitions between phases.More energy is present after the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The text book stated that this phenomenon could not be explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at a very simple example of heating which may explain this process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is heated because electrons in the material are converted to photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur. Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to how the process works.All phase change processes work the same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion generator operates at very high voltages with very little current involved.It is possible to develop this ion transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal differential will cause a development of current and voltage as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet. Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line of experimentation.Norm BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super Conductivity" they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of using the Linde, liquid air process to provide a super conductive Tesla Coil primary. Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink" with electron densities of a very high order! "Hmmmmn"! On 7/10/2018 5:01 AM, Thaelin [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: > > Hi Norm: > I have a few of these that were in the ice chests and such. You > mention that some are coolers and others are generators. Can you > elaborate on what the differences are? For someone out in the rough, a > solar panel is a dead give away you are there. A black surface in the > same area would be hard to notice if you were not really looking. This > tech perks my interest for LV generation. > > thay > > -------------------------------------------- > On Mon, 7/9/18, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] General info! > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, July 9, 2018, 2:26 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warren, I put together a one square ft. laminated > panel that had > 100 Peltier chips that proved the concept and yes, > they do produce > 10X more output per square meter of collector surface > over the > photovoltaic collectors with just the differential of > 100 degrees > F. It would take a pilot program funded to make sheets > of these > junctions. Dollars $$$$. Purchasing the Peltiers > from Alibaba, > China is the lowest prices I have found for the > Generator chips. > (bulk buy). BTW! They do make both chips, > refrigeration and > generator versions. Norm > > > > > On 7/8/2018 12:36 PM, > Warren Keillor > [email protected] > [EVGRAY] wrote: > > > > > > > > Norman > If > we can > make test units, it would be good. > Cheers > Warren > > > > Sent > from Yahoo Mail on Android > > > > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 at 11:43 AM, > Norman Wootan > [email protected] > [EVGRAY] > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am searching my files as we > write > looking for Peltier tables of > output. If > sheets of bonded junctions > would be made, > this approach has 10X energy > output over > the photovoltaic approach per > square ft. > of space. Uses only temp > differential > from the ambient > environment. > > > > > > On > 7/8/2018 2:54 AM, Warren > Keillor [email protected] > [EVGRAY] wrote: > > > > > > > > Norman > You > have written the best > essay on this > subject I have ever > read. > What > an interesting concept, > well > researched. > By > carefully stating the > subject, you > also leave the door open > to further > research on a collective > basis, for > a group effort to build > practical > applications. > This > paper deserves > recognition in a > serious scientific > journal. > Cheers > Warren > > Sent > from > Yahoo Mail on > Android > > > > > On Sat, 7 Jul > 2018 at 8:56 > PM, Norman Wootan > [email protected] > [EVGRAY] > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Try > this one: > > > > What is > Heat > #3 > > > > > For about 10 > years > I have been > > studying the > > effects of > heating and > > cooling associated > with > the phase > change > of > liquids with > the > hope of > > building a simple > > generator of > electrical > power > around the > > phenomenon. > > The reason > for > this > interest is > based > on the > theory > that energy > can be > extracted > from the > > ambient background > via > thermal > > differentials. > > My > line of > > thinking really > took > off back when > I > experimented > with the all > too > familiar > > Peltier junction > > devices found in > electronic > > cooling devices. > > Would you > > believe that most > people do not > > understand how > these > devices move > > thermal > energy > > through a current > flow > across a > > semiconductor > junction. > > Historically > we > find that > German > physicist, > Thomas > > Seebeck back in > 1820 > observed that > when > heat was > applied to a > > junction of copper > and > steel wire > > that > electrical > energy > resulted. > > Later in > 1834 > Jean Peltier > discovered > that > when a direct > > current was > > applied to two > Dissimilar > metals > the > > junction got hot > or > cold. It > was > not > Until 1838 > that > Emil Lenz > > clearly showed the > > importance of > Both Seebeck > and > Peltier s > > discoveries by > > placing a drop of > Water on the > > junction of > > dissimilar metals > which > froze then > Melted when > the > polarity of > the > direct current > > was > Reversed. > > These > > discoveries > > remained dormant > for > over 100 > Years because > of the > > unavailability of > > semiconductor > Materials > which > could > > provide the wide > > temperature > Differentials. > > In the 1930 > s > semiconductor > > materials became > Available > which > revived the > > electric cooling > > principles. > > In > The 1960 s > many > companies > began > building > spot > cooling > Devices and > > refrigerators > based > on these > > effects using a > Junction > > material of > > bismuth-telluride. > Today > more > > advanced > Materials are > used > with the > basic > parameters > of > being a pore > Thermal > > conductor but > being > an excellent > > electrical > Conductor. > The > dissimilar > > materials must > > provide a high > Coefficient > of > voltage > > temperature > > relationship. > > The first > Peltier > > devices that I > > experimented with > back > about 10 > > years > ago were > built > by Marlow > > Industries here in > > Dallas. With > > a > small > > temperature > > differential > across > the device > a > weak > current with > an > attendant > > voltage was > > developed. > > Increasing > the > > differential > > provided a > > proportional > > increase in > > current > and voltage. > > About 6 > years > ago I posted > a > chart of the > wattage > > generated from two > > different size > > Peltier chips on > the Keely Net > > BBS. My > > curiosity was > based > on the > puzzle > of > how electron > flow > could move > > thermal energy > across > the > junctions and > how > electrical > energy > was > > produced by moving > thermal > energy > across the > > junction. This > is a > directly > reversible > > situation based on > > polarity. > Now let us > look > at a very > > familiar parallel > > process used in > refrigeration, > > cooling and > > heating devices > > employing phase > change > > material such as > water > and > > refrigerants. > > We have > always been > led to > believe > that > evaporating > water > provided > cooling > > effects which is a > > mechanical > > process. By the > > same > mechanical > > process we are > > provided heating > > effects by the > condensation > of a > gas back to a > liquid > phase > > change. Would > > you believe > that > any material > that > undergoes a > phase > change > provides an > > attendant > > electrical effect. > > Back in > > 1840 > Armstrong > > invented an > > electrostatic > > generator based on > escaping > steam > through > > insulated nozzles > which > provided one > of the most > > powerful devices > of > this type ever > > built. > Popular > belief > was that > this > was a > > frictional process > > with > the > > electrical output > > resulting from the > steam > friction > passing > > through the > > nozzles. After > > reading an old > (1920 > s) > Thermodynamics > in > Chemistry text > book I > realized > that > the > phase change > of > materials was > an > electrical > > phenomenon and > not purely > > mechanical. > > The atoms > of the > material > lose > or > gain > > electrons in the > > process which > > accounts for the > discrepancy > in the > energy > > equation when a > > material > transitions > > between phases. > > More energy > is > present after > the phase > change > back to the > lower > form or > atomic > state. The > text book > stated > that this > > phenomenon could > not > be > explained. > > When Jerry > and I > attended a > > Conference hosted > > by > Hal Puthoff > down > in Austin > back > about 6 years > ago > a > Physicist > from > Austria > > presented a paper > on the > phase > > change > of water and > the > attendant > > electrical > > phenomenon which > > is > totally not > > understood by > modern > science. > > Now my > > suspicions > were > > confirmed that > phase > changes of > > materials are an > electrostatic > > phenomenon, which > leads > us to the > > fundamental > question of, > > What is > > heat? We > were > told in the > > school > that heat is > the > presence of > energy > and cool is > the > absence > of energy. > > What is the > form > of this > > energy? Let > us > look at > a > very simple > > example of heating > which > may explain > > this > process. > > When > > sunlight strikes > an > absorbing > > surface it is > heated > > because electrons > in the > material > are > converted to > photons which > are > emitted in the > > infrared band of > > light > leaving the > > material in a net > > positive state or > > hot. The > more > > electrons a > > material loses the > hotter > it becomes. > > Now > the inverse > > situation is > > explored by > > evaporating some > > water > from the > > surface of a > > material which > leaves > the surface > in > a > net negative > state > or cold. > > Heat or > cold > is based on > > the > ion > > relationship in > the > material. > > When we > apply > a flame > (ionizing) to > a > material we > cause > the emission > of > photons > which is > > basically > > stripping away > > electrons from the > > atomic > structure > > causing a gross > net > positive > > situation to > > occur. > Now we are > > getting a picture > as to > how an > > electric current > across the > > Peltier junction > can > transport > > thermal energy > (ions). > > Since the > energy > is in the > form > of presence > > or > absence of > > electrons then it > is a > simple > > explanation as to > how the > > process works. > > All phase > change > processes > work > the > same way > > basically via ion > > transport and are > not > mechanical > processes > which > we were > > taught. Everything > > in > > chemistry is > an electrical > or > electrostatic > > process at the > atomic > level > based on the > > ionized state of > the > atoms > > involved. > At a Vanguard > > Science Roundtable > > discussion several > years > ago > we talked > about > the ion wind > method > of fire > > fighting in > which ionized > air > will > > extinguish a flame > > because of the > cooling > > effects. Now > we see > Patents > issued > based on > negative ion > > spraying of a > > surface causing it > to > rapidly > cool because > it > becomes net > > negative charged. > > This is a > very > > efficient method > of > > air-conditioning > > because an ion > generator > operates > at very > high > voltages with > very > little > > > current > > involved. > > It is > > possible to > > develop this ion > transport > > (thermal energy) > to > provide direct > > electrical > output from > very > subtle > > temperature > > differentials. > > Remember > that this is > a > direct > > reversible process > where > a thermal > differential > will > cause a > > development of > > current and > > voltage > as in the > > Peltier device. > > I hope that > this > dialog will > provide some > food > for thought > out > there on the > Keely > Net. > Please > > provide some > > feedback on this > very > interesting > > line > of > > experimentation. > > Norm > > > > > On > > 7/7/2018 5:38 PM, > [email protected] > [EVGRAY] wrote: > > > > > > > Norm, > > > > > Part of > > your heat > > treatise was > > evaporated by > > yahoo, feel > > free to send > to > my email, > > very > > interesting > > topic that > > bummed me out > > when I hit > > "Would" and > > nothing > > further! > > > > > > > In > > respect to my > > wireless > > energy > > experiment I > > have found PNP > to > be superior > to > NPN, maybe > > they shut off > > faster being > > always on or > > maybe the end > > result is more > > hole ish. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524 -- > #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp { > border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px > 0;padding:0 10px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp hr { > border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp #yiv7877672524hd { > color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px > 0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp #yiv7877672524ads { > margin-bottom:10px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad { > padding:0 0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad p { > margin:0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad a { > color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor > #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc { > font-family:Arial;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor > #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc #yiv7877672524hd { > margin:10px > 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor > #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc .yiv7877672524ad { > margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524actions { > font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity { > background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span { > font-weight:700;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span:first-child { > text-transform:uppercase;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span a { > color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span span { > color:#ff7900;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span > .yiv7877672524underline { > text-decoration:underline;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach { > clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px > 0;width:400px;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach div a { > text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach img { > border:none;padding-right:5px;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach label { > display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach label a { > text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 blockquote { > margin:0 0 0 4px;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524bold { > font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524bold a { > text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p a { > font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} > > #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p span { > margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} > > #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p > span.yiv7877672524yshortcuts { > margin-right:0;} > > #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524attach-table div div a { > text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524attach-table { > width:400px;} > > #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524file-title a, #yiv7877672524 > div.yiv7877672524file-title a:active, #yiv7877672524 > div.yiv7877672524file-title a:hover, #yiv7877672524 > div.yiv7877672524file-title a:visited { > text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a, > #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:active, > #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:hover, > #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:visited { > text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 div#yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg > #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg p a span.yiv7877672524yshortcuts { > font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524green { > color:#628c2a;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524MsoNormal { > margin:0 0 0 0;} > > #yiv7877672524 o { > font-size:0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div { > float:left;width:72px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div div { > border:1px solid > #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div label { > color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524reco-category { > font-size:77%;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524reco-desc { > font-size:77%;} > > #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524replbq { > margin:4px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { > margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg { > font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, > sans-serif;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg table { > font-size:inherit;font:100%;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg select, > #yiv7877672524 input, #yiv7877672524 textarea { > font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv7877672524 > code { > font:115% monospace;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg * { > line-height:1.22em;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7877672524logo { > padding-bottom:10px;} > > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg p a { > font-family:Verdana;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg > p#yiv7877672524attach-count span { > color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-reco > #yiv7877672524reco-head { > color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-reco { > margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov > li a { > font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov > li { > font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov > ul { > margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text { > font-family:Georgia;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text p { > margin:0 0 1em 0;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text tt { > font-size:120%;} > > #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { > border-right:none !important; > } > #yiv7877672524 > >
[2/3] Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] General info!
2018-07-10T07:44:22-05:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vantablack This coating achieves the highest absorptivity of all! On 7/10/2018 7:24 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/peltier-chip.html Thay, I have had an > account with Alibaba for many years and have ordered sample quantities > of items from them. I really don"t know what the difference is between > the refrigeration and generator chips. May be something in the > semi-conductor material used. Alibaba is the cheapest source of the > Peltier Junctions that I have found. I got a ton of the Marlow Ind. > chips via salvage of Medical equipment and main frame computer > systems. Regarding the black body solar panels, please go back and > read the various articles that I have posed on my research. Recent > break through on black body technology is fantastic. The latest from > Industry is a total efficiency of greater than 99 percent absorptive! > Thay! do your homework and read all the references to get the whole > picture! > > https://www.aremco.com/news-item/new-hie-coat-840-c-high-temp-black-body-coating-offered/ > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body > > Long, long ago I read an interesting article regarding the behavior of > infrared radiation and quickly picked up on the fact that photons in > the infrared / far-infrared region of light cannot penetrate a > collector glazing at acute angles. 45 degrees or less. A black body > surface is a near perfect receptor as well as a near perfect emmiter > of photons. Proof of this is the fact that you can make ice on a > clear sky over desert with a black body emmiter. The radiation into > space of the IR band photons leave the surface in a gross negative > state thereby creating temperatures below freezing. (Read my article > What is Heat) The secret is in ionization phenomenon. Now let's look > at the powerful ionization rays of full spectrum sun light. When the > sunlight penetrates the glazing of your solar collector and strikes > your black body receptor surface ,said surface becomes ionized gross > positive due to photon re-emmision in the far infrared and infrared > spectrum. The preponderance of this re-emmision from the black body > surface is at 90 degrees to the surface. Hmmm. Now understanding > that the infrared spectrum cannot penetrate the glazing (re-emmision, > you just make your collector surface into 90 degree trouths ( so that > re-emmission is at a 45 degree angle to underside glazing angle of > incidence. A quarter silvered tempered glazing is real important > here. The collector is super efficient when you encase the whole > thing in thermal foam to prevent heat losses due to overall collector > heating. The unit that I built was a zeolyte based collector and the > super thermal efficient design sent the operating temperatures over > 200 degrees and shattered the glazing. The collector back plane was > made from a 4ft. X 8ft. sheet of mild steel bent in a metal break with > 8 inch wide 90 degree troughs which gave me a IR re-emmision angle of > incidence of 45 degrees (perponderence) You have now cut your losses > of energy to the lowest possible. The application of the Peltier chip > coating (array) to the front side and circulating cooling water or air > to the backside of collector plane will give you more than 100 degree > thermal differential across the chips thus yielding a very efficient > overall collector. 10X greater output over photovoltaic collectors. > Sure the cost is much greater but good investment. See: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_internal_reflection > https://physics.ucf.edu/~rep/publications/JournalPubs2010/ClearyGrating2010.pdf > > On 1/16/2016 10:06 AM, Norman wrote: > > PS: > > Natural infrared > > Sunlight, at an effective temperature of 5,780 kelvins, is composed of > nearly thermal-spectrum radiation that is slightly more than half > infrared. At zenith, sunlight provides an irradiance > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irradiance>of just over 1 kilowatt > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt>per square meter at sea level. > Of this energy, 527 watts is infrared radiation, 445 watts is visible > light <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_light>, and 32 watts is > ultraviolet <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet>radiation.^[10] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#cite_note-10> > > On the surface of Earth, at far lower temperatures than the surface of > the Sun, almost all thermal radiation consists of infrared in various > wavelengths. Of these natural thermal radiation processes only > lightning and natural fires are hot enough to produce much visible > energy, and fires produce far more infrared than visible-light energy. > If you are going to collect it you have to know what you are dealing with! > > On 1/16/2016 10:01 AM, Norman wrote: > > Back in the "day" 1996 when we were doing the "Elemental Replication/ > "holy water" experiments, the two Texas Instruments Chemist present > told of how they created a "black-body absorber" by acid etch burning > of hard chrome that produced a "blackest black" that you will ever > see. Totally absorbed all light with no re-emission at all. This > really "intrigued me for I was designing a very special "flat plate" > solar collector, the design of which no one had thought of! The > design of a collector that has "zero" re-emission means that you > capture all of the solar influx energy with practically no loss back > to the atmosphere other than the modest heating of the surrounding > housing material. If you are interested in the possibility of a > Peltier Junction Collector, it is wise to read the following document. > http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/31267.pdf > There are other "tricks of the trade" which most "solar guys" are not > aware of. > Of course you cannot even think of designing "the perfect collector" > without reading and totally understanding the subject of absorption/ > re-emission. Best start is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared > "Enjoy"! Norm > > On 1/15/2016 1:46 PM, Norman wrote: > > Moray! Here is a rundown on the use of the Peltier Junction Chips > from back in the 60s. See; > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_Electric_Boatwhere > large 8 ton capable solid state cooling (very compact) units were > used on all the nuclear submarines since they had plenty of power > available and these units took up very little room. ( I have numerous > photos) Second generation computers and electronics used them for the > obvious reasons due to compactness. Salvaging out of this old > technology was done to recover the tons of 6061 extruded cooling and > heating finned sinks. The Peltier chips went into a bin where I got > thousands of them for the taking. I sold them for a buck apiece to my > friend at B.G. Micro here in Dallas for he had customers waiting to > get there hands on them. The wholesale price to Industry was at the > time about $7.00 for the large 3 sq inch chip. The small chips were > about $5.00. If the Electric Boat Engineers had known about the > "reverse" process, they would have bonded via heat sinking putty the > array of chips directly to the "cold" outer hull of the submarines and > supplied a volume of steam to the hot side to deliver a tremendous > amount of electric power from the vast area of the metal hull. "Just > saying"! Lol To answer your question, since there is such a > tremendous output/ sq. meter the Peltier solar panels would be well > worth the investment. There are many ways to get the needed "heat > differential" of which I can see your "brain massaging as I write > this"! Since the chip construction is mostly ceramic & metal alloy > construction, they can take a heat input much greater than I used and > would give many times the power output. I can envision the > development of a panel of similar dimensions as the solar panel with a > continuous laminated membrane of the required semiconductor component > to provide approximately 10 kw from 1X2 meter surface collector > operating at 180 degrees under the glazing glass. Ground cool sinks > could provide the cooling water at near ambient temperatures! "Dead > Nuts" simple! Norm > Roughly figuring, even using the Marlow Peltier large chips @ 3 sq, > in. (1550 sq, in. / meter sq.) = 516 chips x $5 = $2583 for a yield > of greater than 655 watts/ meter sq. Ain't shabby! > > On 1/14/2016 9:59 PM, Mbking42 wrote: > > Norm, > > That is creative! A Peltier junction solar heat to electricity converter. > How cheap can an array of such junctions be made? Would it be > significantly cheaper than today's solar panels? > Good idea, Norm! > > -Moray > > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> > To: Mbking42 <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; jongen422 > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; jerrrysmith > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; jsstone05 > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: jdecker <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; > patrickgbailey <[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]>; mleclair > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 8:38 am > Subject: Re: Vortex cavitation energy > > Moray! "total agreement" here! Here is something to "ponder"! While > studying Victor Schauberger's Implosion Vortex which I incorporated > into my Patent of the Hydrogen Generator, I naturally had to > understand the complex Hilsch tube vortex generator and how through > "ion separation" at tremendous rotational velocities of over a million > rpm caused the more dense, negative ionized air to migrate to the core > discharge and exit as sub zero flow while the "positive ionized air > swirled with high heat gain and exit at the hot air discharge port > creating a mass flow proportion of 75% cold air discharge compared to > a 25% hot air discharge. Heat differential ( this device) 40 degree > F. cold air vs 270 degree hot air discharge from an input of 25 CFM @ > 100 PSI, 100 degree F. air. Different devices produce much colder > and greater differentials. Now when you consider that a "plasmoid" > is a, "As you just pointed out", "A poloidal rotation closing into a > toroidal rotation, a spiral closing on itself". I perceive the > rapidly rotating plasma toroidal ball as a complex implosion vortex > (multiples) with a core of heavily "negative ionized particles" with > an outer mantle of highly ionized "positive" particles. The infolding > super high speed rotation causes the "charge separation. The > "positive" outer mantle give the appearance of a "positive" event when > in reality the core is "Negative". and more dense. The implosion > vortex proves this to be true. > Please give the following some thought! > Back in the early 90s I wrote a small piece on my ideas as to "What is > Heat"??? I posted this to KeelNet with no response. Since I was doing > a lot of salvage work on 1st & 2nd generation computer equipment I was > able to accumulate hundreds of Peltier Cooling Chips which are > manufactured by Marlow Industries here in Dallas. If you can provide > a DC current across this device and get "ion separation", a hot side > and a cold side. it would be 'logical" (as Spock would say) to assume > that a temperature differential across a junction device like this > will yield a DC current @ a given voltage i.e. wattage output. BTW, > all of this was posted to the KeelyNet after I performed the > experiment with "no comments"! I carefully set up a "hot" sink of > heated water pumped through a copper block (hot side) and a "cold"" > sink, with normal tap water flowing through a copper block on cold > side! Here are the results of the Peltier Junction Chip output. > > Peltier Junction, small chip, 1.25" X 1.25" = 1.5625 sq." I used > several different heat/cold differentials to provide a wattage output > graph. > > 116 F. - 65 F. = 51 F. differential = .35 A @ .63 VDC = .22 > watts > 119 F. - 63 F. = 56 F. differential = .40 A @ .69 VDC = .276 watts > 158 F. - 63 F. = 95 F. differential = .70 A @ 1.21 VDC = .847 watts > 163 F. - 62 F. = 101 F. differential = .80 A @ 1.29 VDC = 1.03 watts > > Peltier Junction, large chip, 1.75" X 1.75" = 3.06 sq" > > 127 F. - 65 F. = 62 F. differential = .80 A @ .62 VDC = .496 > watts > 134 F. - 63 F. = 71 F. differential = .90 A @ .70 VDC = > .63 watts > 142 F. - 63 F. = 79 F. differential = 1.0 A @ .76 VDC = > .76 watts > 150 F. - 63 F. = 87 F. differential = 1.2 A @ .86 VDC = 1.03 > watts > 157 F. - 62 F. = 95 F. differential = 1.22 A @! .93 VDC = 1.13 > watts > 162 F. - 62 F. = 100 F. differential = 1.35 A @ 1.0 VDC = 1.35 watts > > Now consider that the "accepted" solar heat influx, full daytime > sunlight is approximately one kilowatt / square meter. > Photovoltaic solar collectors are just breaking the 10% efficiencies > of converting the solar input into electrical output which means that > they are achieving approximately 100 watts per square meter of > collector surface. > > From the above Pelteir Junction table you can do a quick calculation > and realize that the output is vastly superior to solar! > The small chip puts out .659 watts / square inch X 1550 square inches > / square meter = 1021.765 watts / square meter @ 101 F. differential. > > The large chip puts out .44 watts / square inch @ a temperature > differential of 100 F. yielding (1550 square inches / square meter) > 683.8 watts / meter square. Quite a difference compared to the 100 > watts / square meter for solar collectors. Any heat source with an > attendant cold sink can provide electric power via Peltier Junction > far superior to solar cells. > > Flat plate collectors in direct sunlight can achieve collector > temperatures close to 180 F. so with a cold sink maintained by ambient > temp water you can greatly outperform standard solar collection > performance. I think "Spock" would agree! > > My ideas as to just "What is Heat"! Crude by thought provocative! > Norm > > What is Heat #2 > > For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of > > heating and cooling associated with the phase change of > > liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of > > electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this > > interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted > > from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My > > line of thinking really took off back when I experimented > > with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in > > electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most > > people do not understand how these devices move thermal > > energy through a current flow across a semiconductor > > junction.Historically we find thatGerman physicist, > > Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was > > applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that > > electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier > > discovered that when a direct current was applied to two > > dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not > > until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of > > both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of > > water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then > > melted when the polarity of the direct current was > > reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100 > > years because of the unavailability of semiconductor > > materials which could provide the wide temperature > > differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became > > available which revived the electric cooling principles.In > > the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling > > devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a > > junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced > > materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore > > thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical > > conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high > > coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first > > Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years > > ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a > > small temperature differential across the device a weak > > current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing > > the differential provided a proportional increase in current > > and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the > > wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on > > the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of > > how electron flow could move thermal energy across the > > junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving > > thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly > > reversible situation based on polarity. > > Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in > > refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase > > change material such as water and refrigerants.We have > > always been led to believe that evaporating water provided > > cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same > > mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the > > condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would > > you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change > > provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840 > > Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on > > escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one > > of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. > > Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with > > the electrical output resulting from the steam friction > > passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s) > > Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the > > phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and > > not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or > > gain electrons in the process which accounts for the > > discrepancy in the energy equation when a material > > transitions between phases.More energy is present after > > the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The > > text book stated that this phenomenon could not be > > explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by > > Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a > > physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change > > of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is > > totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions > > were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an > > electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental > > question of,What is heat?We were told in theschool > > that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence > > of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at > > a very simple example of heating which may explain this > > process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is > > heated because electrons in the material are converted to > > photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light > > leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The > > more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now > > the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water > > from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a > > net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the > > ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame > > (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons > > which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic > > structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur. > > Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current > > across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy > > (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or > > absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to > > how the process works.All phase change processes work the > > same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical > > processes which we were taught.Everythingin chemistry is > > an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level > > based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. > > At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago > > we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in > > which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the > > cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on > > negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly > > cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a > > very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion > > generator operates at very high voltages with very little > > current involved.It is possible to develop this ion > > transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical > > output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember > > that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal > > differential will cause a development of current and voltage > > as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will > > provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet. > > Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line > > of experimentation.Norm > > > BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super Conductivity" > they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of using the Linde, > liquid air process to provide a super conductive Tesla Coil primary. > Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink" with electron densities of > a very high order! "Hmmmmn"! > > > > On 7/10/2018 5:01 AM, Thaelin [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: >> >> Hi Norm: >> I have a few of these that were in the ice chests and such. You >> mention that some are coolers and others are generators. Can you >> elaborate on what the differences are? For someone out in the rough, >> a solar panel is a dead give away you are there. A black surface in >> the same area would be hard to notice if you were not really looking. >> This tech perks my interest for LV generation. >> >> thay >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> On Mon, 7/9/18, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] General info! >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Monday, July 9, 2018, 2:26 PM >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Warren, I put together a one square ft. laminated >> panel that had >> 100 Peltier chips that proved the concept and yes, >> they do produce >> 10X more output per square meter of collector surface >> over the >> photovoltaic collectors with just the differential of >> 100 degrees >> F. It would take a pilot program funded to make sheets >> of these >> junctions. Dollars $$$$. Purchasing the Peltiers >> from Alibaba, >> China is the lowest prices I have found for the >> Generator chips. >> (bulk buy). BTW! They do make both chips, >> refrigeration and >> generator versions. Norm >> >> >> >> >> On 7/8/2018 12:36 PM, >> Warren Keillor >> [email protected] >> [EVGRAY] wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Norman >> If >> we can >> make test units, it would be good. >> Cheers >> Warren >> >> >> >> Sent >> from Yahoo Mail on Android >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 at 11:43 AM, >> Norman Wootan >> [email protected] >> [EVGRAY] >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I am searching my files as we >> write >> looking for Peltier tables of >> output. If >> sheets of bonded junctions >> would be made, >> this approach has 10X energy >> output over >> the photovoltaic approach per >> square ft. >> of space. Uses only temp >> differential >> from the ambient >> environment. >> >> >> >> >> >> On >> 7/8/2018 2:54 AM, Warren >> Keillor [email protected] >> [EVGRAY] wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Norman >> You >> have written the best >> essay on this >> subject I have ever >> read. >> What >> an interesting concept, >> well >> researched. >> By >> carefully stating the >> subject, you >> also leave the door open >> to further >> research on a collective >> basis, for >> a group effort to build >> practical >> applications. >> This >> paper deserves >> recognition in a >> serious scientific >> journal. >> Cheers >> Warren >> >> Sent >> from >> Yahoo Mail on >> Android >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 7 Jul >> 2018 at 8:56 >> PM, Norman Wootan >> [email protected] >> [EVGRAY] >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Try >> this one: >> >> >> >> What is >> Heat >> #3 >> >> >> >> >> For about 10 >> years >> I have been >> >> studying the >> >> effects of >> heating and >> >> cooling associated >> with >> the phase >> change >> of >> liquids with >> the >> hope of >> >> building a simple >> >> generator of >> electrical >> power >> around the >> >> phenomenon. >> >> The reason >> for >> this >> interest is >> based >> on the >> theory >> that energy >> can be >> extracted >> from the >> >> ambient background >> via >> thermal >> >> differentials. >> >> My >> line of >> >> thinking really >> took >> off back when >> I >> experimented >> with the all >> too >> familiar >> >> Peltier junction >> >> devices found in >> electronic >> >> cooling devices. >> >> Would you >> >> believe that most >> people do not >> >> understand how >> these >> devices move >> >> thermal >> energy >> >> through a current >> flow >> across a >> >> semiconductor >> junction. >> >> Historically >> we >> find that >> German >> physicist, >> Thomas >> >> Seebeck back in >> 1820 >> observed that >> when >> heat was >> applied to a >> >> junction of copper >> and >> steel wire >> >> that >> electrical >> energy >> resulted. >> >> Later in >> 1834 >> Jean Peltier >> discovered >> that >> when a direct >> >> current was >> >> applied to two >> Dissimilar >> metals >> the >> >> junction got hot >> or >> cold. It >> was >> not >> Until 1838 >> that >> Emil Lenz >> >> clearly showed the >> >> importance of >> Both Seebeck >> and >> Peltier s >> >> discoveries by >> >> placing a drop of >> Water on the >> >> junction of >> >> dissimilar metals >> which >> froze then >> Melted when >> the >> polarity of >> the >> direct current >> >> was >> Reversed. >> >> These >> >> discoveries >> >> remained dormant >> for >> over 100 >> Years because >> of the >> >> unavailability of >> >> semiconductor >> Materials >> which >> could >> >> provide the wide >> >> temperature >> Differentials. >> >> In the 1930 >> s >> semiconductor >> >> materials became >> Available >> which >> revived the >> >> electric cooling >> >> principles. >> >> In >> The 1960 s >> many >> companies >> began >> building >> spot >> cooling >> Devices and >> >> refrigerators >> based >> on these >> >> effects using a >> Junction >> >> material of >> >> bismuth-telluride. >> Today >> more >> >> advanced >> Materials are >> used >> with the >> basic >> parameters >> of >> being a pore >> Thermal >> >> conductor but >> being >> an excellent >> >> electrical >> Conductor. >> The >> dissimilar >> >> materials must >> >> provide a high >> Coefficient >> of >> voltage >> >> temperature >> >> relationship. >> >> The first >> Peltier >> >> devices that I >> >> experimented with >> back >> about 10 >> >> years >> ago were >> built >> by Marlow >> >> Industries here in >> >> Dallas. With >> >> a >> small >> >> temperature >> >> differential >> across >> the device >> a >> weak >> current with >> an >> attendant >> >> voltage was >> >> developed. >> >> Increasing >> the >> >> differential >> >> provided a >> >> proportional >> >> increase in >> >> current >> and voltage. >> >> About 6 >> years >> ago I posted >> a >> chart of the >> wattage >> >> generated from two >> >> different size >> >> Peltier chips on >> the Keely Net >> >> BBS. My >> >> curiosity was >> based >> on the >> puzzle >> of >> how electron >> flow >> could move >> >> thermal energy >> across >> the >> junctions and >> how >> electrical >> energy >> was >> >> produced by moving >> thermal >> energy >> across the >> >> junction. This >> is a >> directly >> reversible >> >> situation based on >> >> polarity. >> Now let us >> look >> at a very >> >> familiar parallel >> >> process used in >> refrigeration, >> >> cooling and >> >> heating devices >> >> employing phase >> change >> >> material such as >> water >> and >> >> refrigerants. >> >> We have >> always been >> led to >> believe >> that >> evaporating >> water >> provided >> cooling >> >> effects which is a >> >> mechanical >> >> process. By the >> >> same >> mechanical >> >> process we are >> >> provided heating >> >> effects by the >> condensation >> of a >> gas back to a >> liquid >> phase >> >> change. Would >> >> you believe >> that >> any material >> that >> undergoes a >> phase >> change >> provides an >> >> attendant >> >> electrical effect. >> >> Back in >> >> 1840 >> Armstrong >> >> invented an >> >> electrostatic >> >> generator based on >> escaping >> steam >> through >> >> insulated nozzles >> which >> provided one >> of the most >> >> powerful devices >> of >> this type ever >> >> built. >> Popular >> belief >> was that >> this >> was a >> >> frictional process >> >> with >> the >> >> electrical output >> >> resulting from the >> steam >> friction >> passing >> >> through the >> >> nozzles. After >> >> reading an old >> (1920 >> s) >> Thermodynamics >> in >> Chemistry text >> book I >> realized >> that >> the >> phase change >> of >> materials was >> an >> electrical >> >> phenomenon and >> not purely >> >> mechanical. >> >> The atoms >> of the >> material >> lose >> or >> gain >> >> electrons in the >> >> process which >> >> accounts for the >> discrepancy >> in the >> energy >> >> equation when a >> >> material >> transitions >> >> between phases. >> >> More energy >> is >> present after >> the phase >> change >> back to the >> lower >> form or >> atomic >> state. The >> text book >> stated >> that this >> >> phenomenon could >> not >> be >> explained. >> >> When Jerry >> and I >> attended a >> >> Conference hosted >> >> by >> Hal Puthoff >> down >> in Austin >> back >> about 6 years >> ago >> a >> Physicist >> from >> Austria >> >> presented a paper >> on the >> phase >> >> change >> of water and >> the >> attendant >> >> electrical >> >> phenomenon which >> >> is >> totally not >> >> understood by >> modern >> science. >> >> Now my >> >> suspicions >> were >> >> confirmed that >> phase >> changes of >> >> materials are an >> electrostatic >> >> phenomenon, which >> leads >> us to the >> >> fundamental >> question of, >> >> What is >> >> heat? We >> were >> told in the >> >> school >> that heat is >> the >> presence of >> energy >> and cool is >> the >> absence >> of energy. >> >> What is the >> form >> of this >> >> energy? Let >> us >> look at >> a >> very simple >> >> example of heating >> which >> may explain >> >> this >> process. >> >> When >> >> sunlight strikes >> an >> absorbing >> >> surface it is >> heated >> >> because electrons >> in the >> material >> are >> converted to >> photons which >> are >> emitted in the >> >> infrared band of >> >> light >> leaving the >> >> material in a net >> >> positive state or >> >> hot. The >> more >> >> electrons a >> >> material loses the >> hotter >> it becomes. >> >> Now >> the inverse >> >> situation is >> >> explored by >> >> evaporating some >> >> water >> from the >> >> surface of a >> >> material which >> leaves >> the surface >> in >> a >> net negative >> state >> or cold. >> >> Heat or >> cold >> is based on >> >> the >> ion >> >> relationship in >> the >> material. >> >> When we >> apply >> a flame >> (ionizing) to >> a >> material we >> cause >> the emission >> of >> photons >> which is >> >> basically >> >> stripping away >> >> electrons from the >> >> atomic >> structure >> >> causing a gross >> net >> positive >> >> situation to >> >> occur. >> Now we are >> >> getting a picture >> as to >> how an >> >> electric current >> across the >> >> Peltier junction >> can >> transport >> >> thermal energy >> (ions). >> >> Since the >> energy >> is in the >> form >> of presence >> >> or >> absence of >> >> electrons then it >> is a >> simple >> >> explanation as to >> how the >> >> process works. >> >> All phase >> change >> processes >> work >> the >> same way >> >> basically via ion >> >> transport and are >> not >> mechanical >> processes >> which >> we were >> >> taught. Everything >> >> in >> >> chemistry is >> an electrical >> or >> electrostatic >> >> process at the >> atomic >> level >> based on the >> >> ionized state of >> the >> atoms >> >> involved. >> At a Vanguard >> >> Science Roundtable >> >> discussion several >> years >> ago >> we talked >> about >> the ion wind >> method >> of fire >> >> fighting in >> which ionized >> air >> will >> >> extinguish a flame >> >> because of the >> cooling >> >> effects. Now >> we see >> Patents >> issued >> based on >> negative ion >> >> spraying of a >> >> surface causing it >> to >> rapidly >> cool because >> it >> becomes net >> >> negative charged. >> >> This is a >> very >> >> efficient method >> of >> >> air-conditioning >> >> because an ion >> generator >> operates >> at very >> high >> voltages with >> very >> little >> >> >> current >> >> involved. >> >> It is >> >> possible to >> >> develop this ion >> transport >> >> (thermal energy) >> to >> provide direct >> >> electrical >> output from >> very >> subtle >> >> temperature >> >> differentials. >> >> Remember >> that this is >> a >> direct >> >> reversible process >> where >> a thermal >> differential >> will >> cause a >> >> development of >> >> current and >> >> voltage >> as in the >> >> Peltier device. >> >> I hope that >> this >> dialog will >> provide some >> food >> for thought >> out >> there on the >> Keely >> Net. >> Please >> >> provide some >> >> feedback on this >> very >> interesting >> >> line >> of >> >> experimentation. >> >> Norm >> >> >> >> >> On >> >> 7/7/2018 5:38 PM, >> [email protected] >> [EVGRAY] wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Norm, >> >> >> >> >> Part of >> >> your heat >> >> treatise was >> >> evaporated by >> >> yahoo, feel >> >> free to send >> to >> my email, >> >> very >> >> interesting >> >> topic that >> >> bummed me out >> >> when I hit >> >> "Would" and >> >> nothing >> >> further! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In >> >> respect to my >> >> wireless >> >> energy >> >> experiment I >> >> have found PNP >> to >> be superior >> to >> NPN, maybe >> >> they shut off >> >> faster being >> >> always on or >> >> maybe the end >> >> result is more >> >> hole ish. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524 -- >> #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp { >> border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px >> 0;padding:0 10px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp hr { >> border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp #yiv7877672524hd { >> color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px >> 0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp #yiv7877672524ads { >> margin-bottom:10px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad { >> padding:0 0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad p { >> margin:0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad a { >> color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor >> #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc { >> font-family:Arial;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor >> #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc #yiv7877672524hd { >> margin:10px >> 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor >> #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc .yiv7877672524ad { >> margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524actions { >> font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity { >> background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span { >> font-weight:700;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span:first-child { >> text-transform:uppercase;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span a { >> color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span span { >> color:#ff7900;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span >> .yiv7877672524underline { >> text-decoration:underline;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach { >> clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px >> 0;width:400px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach div a { >> text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach img { >> border:none;padding-right:5px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach label { >> display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach label a { >> text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 blockquote { >> margin:0 0 0 4px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524bold { >> font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524bold a { >> text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p a { >> font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p span { >> margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p >> span.yiv7877672524yshortcuts { >> margin-right:0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524attach-table div div a { >> text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524attach-table { >> width:400px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524file-title a, #yiv7877672524 >> div.yiv7877672524file-title a:active, #yiv7877672524 >> div.yiv7877672524file-title a:hover, #yiv7877672524 >> div.yiv7877672524file-title a:visited { >> text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a, >> #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:active, >> #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:hover, >> #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:visited { >> text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 div#yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg >> #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg p a span.yiv7877672524yshortcuts { >> font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524green { >> color:#628c2a;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524MsoNormal { >> margin:0 0 0 0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 o { >> font-size:0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div { >> float:left;width:72px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div div { >> border:1px solid >> #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div label { >> color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524reco-category { >> font-size:77%;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524reco-desc { >> font-size:77%;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524replbq { >> margin:4px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { >> margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg { >> font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, >> sans-serif;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg table { >> font-size:inherit;font:100%;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg select, >> #yiv7877672524 input, #yiv7877672524 textarea { >> font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv7877672524 >> code { >> font:115% monospace;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg * { >> line-height:1.22em;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7877672524logo { >> padding-bottom:10px;} >> >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg p a { >> font-family:Verdana;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg >> p#yiv7877672524attach-count span { >> color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-reco >> #yiv7877672524reco-head { >> color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-reco { >> margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov >> li a { >> font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov >> li { >> font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov >> ul { >> margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text { >> font-family:Georgia;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text p { >> margin:0 0 1em 0;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text tt { >> font-size:120%;} >> >> #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { >> border-right:none !important; >> } >> #yiv7877672524 >> >> >
[3/3] Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] General info!
2018-07-10T10:01:40+00:00
·
Thaelin
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Hi Norm: I have a few of these that were in the ice chests and such. You mention that some are coolers and others are generators. Can you elaborate on what the differences are? For someone out in the rough, a solar panel is a dead give away you are there. A black surface in the same area would be hard to notice if you were not really looking. This tech perks my interest for LV generation. thay -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 7/9/18, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] General info! To: [email protected] Date: Monday, July 9, 2018, 2:26 PM Warren, I put together a one square ft. laminated panel that had 100 Peltier chips that proved the concept and yes, they do produce 10X more output per square meter of collector surface over the photovoltaic collectors with just the differential of 100 degrees F. It would take a pilot program funded to make sheets of these junctions. Dollars $$$$. Purchasing the Peltiers from Alibaba, China is the lowest prices I have found for the Generator chips. (bulk buy). BTW! They do make both chips, refrigeration and generator versions. Norm On 7/8/2018 12:36 PM, Warren Keillor [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: Norman If we can make test units, it would be good. Cheers Warren Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 at 11:43 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote: I am searching my files as we write looking for Peltier tables of output. If sheets of bonded junctions would be made, this approach has 10X energy output over the photovoltaic approach per square ft. of space. Uses only temp differential from the ambient environment. On 7/8/2018 2:54 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: Norman You have written the best essay on this subject I have ever read. What an interesting concept, well researched. By carefully stating the subject, you also leave the door open to further research on a collective basis, for a group effort to build practical applications. This paper deserves recognition in a serious scientific journal. Cheers Warren Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 at 8:56 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote: Try this one: What is Heat #3 For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of heating and cooling associated with the phase change of liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of electrical power around the phenomenon. The reason for this interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted from the ambient background via thermal differentials. My line of thinking really took off back when I experimented with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in electronic cooling devices. Would you believe that most people do not understand how these devices move thermal energy through a current flow across a semiconductor junction. Historically we find that German physicist, Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that electrical energy resulted. Later in 1834 Jean Peltier discovered that when a direct current was applied to two Dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold. It was not Until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of Both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of Water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then Melted when the polarity of the direct current was Reversed. These discoveries remained dormant for over 100 Years because of the unavailability of semiconductor Materials which could provide the wide temperature Differentials. In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became Available which revived the electric cooling principles. In The 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling Devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a Junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced Materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore Thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical Conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high Coefficient of voltage temperature relationship. The first Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas. With a small temperature differential across the device a weak current with an attendant voltage was developed. Increasing the differential provided a proportional increase in current and voltage. About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on the Keely Net BBS. My curiosity was based on the puzzle of how electron flow could move thermal energy across the junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving thermal energy across the junction. This is a directly reversible situation based on polarity. Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase change material such as water and refrigerants. We have always been led to believe that evaporating water provided cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change. Would you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change provides an attendant electrical effect. Back in 1840 Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one of the most powerful devices of this type ever built. Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with the electrical output resulting from the steam friction passing through the nozzles. After reading an old (1920 s) Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and not purely mechanical. The atoms of the material lose or gain electrons in the process which accounts for the discrepancy in the energy equation when a material transitions between phases. More energy is present after the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The text book stated that this phenomenon could not be explained. When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a Physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is totally not understood by modern science. Now my suspicions were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental question of, What is heat? We were told in the school that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence of energy. What is the form of this energy? Let us look at a very simple example of heating which may explain this process. When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is heated because electrons in the material are converted to photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light leaving the material in a net positive state or hot. The more electrons a material loses the hotter it becomes. Now the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a net negative state or cold. Heat or cold is based on the ion relationship in the material. When we apply a flame (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur. Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy (ions). Since the energy is in the form of presence or absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to how the process works. All phase change processes work the same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical processes which we were taught. Everything in chemistry is an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level based on the ionized state of the atoms involved. At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the cooling effects. Now we see Patents issued based on negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly cool because it becomes net negative charged. This is a very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion generator operates at very high voltages with very little current involved. It is possible to develop this ion transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical output from very subtle temperature differentials. Remember that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal differential will cause a development of current and voltage as in the Peltier device. I hope that this dialog will provide some food for thought out there on the Keely Net. Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line of experimentation. Norm On 7/7/2018 5:38 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote: Norm, Part of your heat treatise was evaporated by yahoo, feel free to send to my email, very interesting topic that bummed me out when I hit "Would" and nothing further! In respect to my wireless energy experiment I have found PNP to be superior to NPN, maybe they shut off faster being always on or maybe the end result is more hole ish. #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524 -- #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp #yiv7877672524hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp #yiv7877672524ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad { padding:0 0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad p { margin:0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mkp .yiv7877672524ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc #yiv7877672524hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ygrp-lc .yiv7877672524ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span { font-weight:700;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524activity span .yiv7877672524underline { text-decoration:underline;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524bold a { text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #yiv7877672524 dd.yiv7877672524last p span.yiv7877672524yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524attach-table { width:400px;} #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524file-title a, #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524file-title a:active, #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524file-title a:hover, #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a, #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:active, #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:hover, #yiv7877672524 div.yiv7877672524photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 div#yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg p a span.yiv7877672524yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524green { color:#628c2a;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #yiv7877672524 o { font-size:0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524reco-category { font-size:77%;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #yiv7877672524 .yiv7877672524replbq { margin:4px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv7877672524 input, #yiv7877672524 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv7877672524 code { font:115% monospace;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-mlmsg #yiv7877672524logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-msg p#yiv7877672524attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-reco #yiv7877672524reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-sponsor #yiv7877672524ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #yiv7877672524 #yiv7877672524ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important; } #yiv7877672524
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →