Fwd: Re: Magnetoelectric vs Electromagnetic
2
messages
·
2019-03-13T07:52:46-05:00
→
2019-03-13T14:45:53+00:00
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →
[1/2] Fwd: Re: Magnetoelectric vs Electromagnetic
2019-03-13T07:52:46-05:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: 09 2019 <> X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: AOyzRz9Z4ILmXIgq/gX7QFo3G+g X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Mozilla-Keys: X-Apparently-To: [email protected]; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:56:14 +0000 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received-SPF: none (domain of vortexenergi.systems does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-YMailISG: hBaR4o8WLDvtgSFXhTisD0VRVaZzQrIZ6XLOVwz7744NEglo xotm0ZfWg4AelQNJPhEBl5JU.c9G.FloiYCw3Fdtbwq8ZsexMY1nTjCReth1 9EVJNRKTJqFcpYlW9oAn3TUGg55c9ISPgxmAri1aciNQudZUuBpx.AmbPzEx RqFwxEDo_7qs_Pn_BY0nvG0MUsSG_EmL7VyjCj7NGeLdKgLUiPZdQW.Y.UkF GaGSS05yp2uP9KjqzQfh6s.yiIpq2h1EE92w4WjpIPKyB4Fvtwmbq4d7T57A vfLQGa976h3kI_Fpk6ibJf7H0nxNrAeSCeJqwCoDY6mU9jOFVgeqLfi9MiUh dHjxwQiNujexQtaNTw6alDpMRfrmHvD5k88Lr5lrSp8oK2.sNmbs28mU0qGj aNSVk2i53.YfUum0DwEL235NKKxylQtLFB_RBt0TAl60F.2gbPn09SCUPCRD 8znIv9wu3gbI7Z2IJR031x37y6DGJkjwSNU7cMfJtZsaPbfmtsqKPvOTz1b4 QmHP1tj6biijtg5DA901IwK.ZZnA9IJKZmzmyTWP0XkbQr2MHgulSii3f9_q WLkrful.dRG9RCZj8e9WUcYJjQ8n2NTzPpTf604d_KmY4xhnuNJDv7OQECMb CjXAYQ.DgONn_mpKBiYEx2DHCNbeEQ6.WDNA3WmXjdGFLpb7olxHEe5RpZIx 0n0FWwOsHft4yke9Y96mRfgrt7FFkId__EnNkdO7WijDjJxguiXx0AGnZX84 3mELmd0Vq1McTQsD2p154Z1yX.dTzKS06f76nZOawMRyHYLEpwXj4gRGO2JB jcHcirnaSpfET3X2jZ4A8CZRXk3fuGFshL9kuNKqL4lsDLfIdIQXqPyDgk43 oh0blF1xDD9RNa4KY7s3lC2RnvJA58nSQqbzyuoHFXdDGHuqkSazszvORpZg hSgA9tTU_kV.o3Wbon_EM29CiGSMOlIUQKzzkE0McISI6bafby5K72.BC_7B A7lVK72qTm4cMVcAb3FzD_yq0nFHAhevBAE9TWZgH77N5GY9asNTVywNixKL XO5o5K9Y5KyE.OwHdvcTjWK7vgFz81k4koZrepHsapfxK9p7acdsK6y..rWA x5cXxo6jgde42hgmFqDY_tT6iSesmG690va9NX3go0nvoAD.QwcEMcU4Nj1m Ki4mXpqVOppE9WH03JYCqL.xWe.DJZdyvTik_Q8cOWbjvfNI6HpFcxUEUx2y qnmRH0H1y7aWNno3bf5ZgRVYdRSlbc2uSBIqKWc6V1o90fv0r2MiokDZwqGZ qzHQnCamZrlZBEh0LxUITqDcRu.0MGa6H4DREge9OKGmLWUlKucgn_jgrsgS EECIPuPaTo812h7SXXY2Za0A39G9vL6ADe5E0NlCkE.kc1F3xsiQkObvsbyw l7zpfuNMmSbtm7uAO9KFKjdqEVyGnUo5_ZWwWR8BAAlxFrNRoZCuu01WMmof zxZf797Ao3c5YIaX7UfdE7jAmtRAt2FrNQFarfaU6CMlZq1y X-Originating-IP: [209.85.210.50] Authentication-Results: mta4068.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [email protected]; header.s=20150623; dkim=pass (ok) Received: from 209.85.210.50 (EHLO alpd683.prodigy.net) (144.160.244.84) by mta4068.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:56:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [209.85.210.50] Received: from mail-ot1-f50.google.com (mail-ot1-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by alpd683.prodigy.net (8.14.4 IN altR5 TLS/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x2CLfSiC069159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <[email protected]>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:56:12 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f50.google.com with SMTP id t7so3909988otk.8 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:56:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vortexenergi-systems.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6CvOPMop27cUvD9aeBKn5x9yx9SCuYgKvIdkPwtm4B8=; b=KwQ6uoAmoyqjiYVUwG86OR0gWYLuZqHCEVn1iax+Cns9pPMP7QJOJfpQkrlsztwLYU 06cgerdxfJfGtfmVTZPL4Yy/s9ok9d+tfNeXZ0gs8oh57x+L37xKo/kHodkwUiu/OX1W CFrxkwcNP6sDrohSrdO6asxZVozH1kkjLVjv2FDmNgoxRUu6ChqoI31sDEdvj9AeayA0 D+otz0RQl54uQhc2E6kOdzvlsXssZSmSAnO5dIQlKWs3DxK/9lha7gb12PFBiWV5afOa CngEII6jlOcy8Lc7gEu3LxEReRy68px5ENAlMA13Sp548f0I0ZMXVqxcie9W5B8WpY4n j+bQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6CvOPMop27cUvD9aeBKn5x9yx9SCuYgKvIdkPwtm4B8=; b=HsmPZSoSinmwCsAyPQXMbLC+19+busBN7adcf9VyZ//TJgXFfbLZGpphznakBvDMdC yvhV4mv/m0oTq9HejBUwGNbNjsXZfzHkpqbc/wEmyLHadBtlLgO0br65SpBEIklUPDPt Xs/3bsAT+Tp8Bp6ZZG4fq+T2/xIPU5C+PtDf/1s3nrigjguZFx8v45rDqtpLUZsxqKh/ u7ApPtJtbPn3IeywKWxSzoISYooYf1NKGUV+g5KEZvZOhmGBtDAWHKosX4S4Rj+26tQu T7Lb4oZwHFEelSJNvcB9MwCEDcI/E+yzLE0pUUKYmKT8vtnRmERp8qBE6bF9IVBUSwoj sC5A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLW4ubjGWgZEpGafDwMkbNBqAnctGpsRSsfzCq+ENIyAu/bBZt 39q8KVszPMXpONxYBdXjxFtT+w50DGc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwDUN4yRxEwE86AsjR6e3P/n3e3WNZP9YH6YYUVqN5DD//akNcXeB42zmw11uGQw4c3fxoMYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c84:: with SMTP id c4mr26381130otr.242.1552427532220; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:4500:7d00:1c72:9345:1eee:e843? ([2600:8802:4500:7d00:1c72:9345:1eee:e843]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm3893524oid.22.2019.03.12.14.51.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-ACE04C46-D5A2-48F8-AD40-6A62ED3EE674 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Magnetoelectric vs Electromagnetic From: Angel Alvarez <[email protected]> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57) In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:51:45 -0700 Cc: Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, Art Devine <[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]>, John Smith <[email protected]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> To: Norman Wootan <[email protected]> Content-Length: 22656 Thank you, I appreciate your explanation. Sent from my mobile phone Angel A. Alvarez P. E. President and Manager of Vortex Energi, LLC 949 632 8315 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> On Mar 12, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Norman Wootan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Angel and Bert, Very old Physics books depicted the magnetic flux > ropes between the earth and the other heavy planets and speculated > that this magnetic flux flow was the cause of core heating and > maintenance of the planets. Example, > https://www.universetoday.com/19234/core-of-uranus/ They re-discover > the obvious. As Bert said, simple sun bathing the surface with > photons does not cut it. Now, If you really want to see over-unity, > try to figure how much energy has to be expended to release the huge > quantity of PHOTON ENERGY from magnetic flux conversion methods. > Blowing up a Neo magnet with 1.5 Tesla field strength yields X amount > of energy, that they have been able to capture vs the explosives > needed to yield an over pressure shock wave of 23GPa/ nano sec. All I > would do is explore the 3rd variable which is heat. Sounds like a > good job for some resonance hammering at super high heat. Just a > thought. Go back to some basic research that happened back a few > years ago on this subject. see attached > > https://www3.aps.anl.gov/~haskel/PS/PRL_HPLCMO.pdf > > Here is a three variable equation that I looked at and as you can see, > you have to consider all three variables in this situation. Vola!~ > > https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/23655/0000621.pdf?seq > > On 3/12/2019 7:59 AM, Angel Alvarez wrote: >> Thank you Bert, your explanation is awesome, great resources! >> >> Sent from my mobile phone >> Angel A. Alvarez P. E. >> President and Manager of >> Vortex Energi, LLC >> 949 632 8315 >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> On Mar 12, 2019, at 2:38 AM, Bert Pool <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> OK, so just how many millions of terawatts of energy are we talking >>> about flowing directly from the sun to the earth in one of these >>> magnetic connections? We always thought the earth was kept nicely >>> heated and comfy (and alive) from the photons falling on the surface >>> - but it seems to me that the energy delivered by random photons of >>> light would pale in comparison to the energy that is being piped >>> straight to the earth through a magnetic tunnel the diameter of the >>> earth! >>> >>> Bert >>> >>> >>> I didn't see any estimations on just how much power this represents. >>> >>> On 3/10/2019 8:30 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>>> >>>> Bert, Bob and all, remember back a few years when NASA was >>>> speculating over a possibly space craft that could travel of near >>>> LUMINAL velocity by navigating in these huge magnetic tubes of >>>> force. Along for the ride so to speak. Now we know for a fact >>>> that Science has the ability to convert magnetic flux into photon >>>> power which is what my whole research has been about.. This is >>>> the reason for the NASA flux tube mapping operation. >>>> >>>> https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=AwrCwOJkD4VcixgA5y8PxQt.;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=magnetic+flux+tube+mapping+by+NASA+satellite&fr=yhs-pty-pty_converter&hspart=pty&hsimp=yhs-pty_converter >>>> >>>> https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/30oct_ftes/ >>>> >>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_tube >>>> >>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_transfer_event >>>> >>>> The space craft extracts its needed power from the magnetic flux >>>> tubs of force. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/6/2019 4:26 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes! Bert, Thought you would find that particular article rather >>>>> interesting. After I read it, I thought about going to the Mr. >>>>> Peabody Way Back Machine and pull up all the writings by the >>>>> Master back then. Gee Wiz. >>>>> >>>>> Wilhelm Röntgen >>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_R%C3%B6ntgen> in 1888 >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetoelectric_effect I firmly >>>>> believe that after we run full circle, we will realize that the >>>>> secret for what we are looking for is in the DIELECTRIC. Hmmmmm. >>>>> >>>>> Norm >>>>> >>>>> On 3/6/2019 10:58 AM, Bert Pool wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Norm, all, that first article blew my mind! I was wondering why I >>>>>> wasn't taught about the magnetoelectric effect back in my >>>>>> electronic school days, and then I saw that the scientific >>>>>> research references on this work only came about sometime around >>>>>> the year 2000 - practically new work, and long after my school days! >>>>>> >>>>>> So, moving a dielectric material through an electrostatic field >>>>>> causes the dielectric to be come magnetized! I would assume that >>>>>> the magnetic field is only generated while the dielectric (or >>>>>> conversely, the electrostatic field) is moving? And the magnetic >>>>>> field disappears (probably) when the relative movement stops? >>>>>> >>>>>> Norm, remember the PZT piezo disks you and Joel used with the MRA? >>>>>> >>>>>> Experiment: Take one of the PZT disks and mount it on a plastic >>>>>> or fiberglass arbor so it can be spun around its axis, kind of >>>>>> like a phonograph record. Place a conductive metallic electrode >>>>>> above part of the piezo and one conductive metal electrode below, >>>>>> and apply an adjustable H.V d.c. electrostatic field to the >>>>>> plates. You now have a moving piezo dielectric which is spinning >>>>>> through a static electric field. You can easily measure whether >>>>>> a magnetic field is being produced by the dielectric with a >>>>>> simple magnetic compass or Hall effect sensor. Note: you'll >>>>>> probably have to grind the silver contact surfaces off both sides >>>>>> of the PZT piezo so that the spinning silver conductors don't >>>>>> screw with the creation of the dielectric's magnetic field. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is an easy enough experiment to do. >>>>>> >>>>>> Step two is to lock the PZT disk in place, so it does NOT move. >>>>>> Replace the single top metal electrode with a series of pie-slice >>>>>> shapeed electrodes arranged in a disk shape (kind of like a >>>>>> sliced pie, with the metal pie slices separated with a small >>>>>> gap). You also replace the lower electrode with a similar series >>>>>> of pie-slice electrodes. Instead of rotating the PZT disk, you >>>>>> instead sequentially charge/discharge the pie segments of the >>>>>> electrostatic disks. You would, thus, in effect, be creating a >>>>>> *rotating electrostatic field*! >>>>>> >>>>>> The obvious question now, is whether you would then be measuring >>>>>> a rotating magnetic field above the PZT disk? As far as I know, >>>>>> there is no limit as to how fast you could sequentially charge >>>>>> the metal disk segments; in other words you could create a >>>>>> phenomenally fast rotating electrostatic field, and since there >>>>>> is no CURRENT flowing, that I can see, there likely is not a >>>>>> counter-emf force you have to fight! >>>>>> >>>>>> Bert >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/3/2019 8:57 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetoelectric_effect >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_field >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostatics >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatics >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bert, If we are to fully understand AG and EMP, we need to >>>>>>> understand the subtle differences from normal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The current debate is how to shield against EMP and Space >>>>>>> Radiation, magnetic. Pay particular attention to the first >>>>>>> topic, especially magnetostrictive and piezo materials >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > <(PDF) Pressure-Induced Magnetic Transition in Manganite > (La0.75Ca0.25MnO3).html>
[2/2] Re: [EVGRAY] Fwd: Re: Magnetoelectric vs Electromagnetic
2019-03-13T14:45:53+00:00
·
bart woodard
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<YTBPR01MB2448B9723DD97160F6CD39E4CE4A0@YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Norm,
At certain points of observations, the cycling of water through the disrupt-er vortex exposure then the physical vortex inside the tank , (imploding) .
The ppms would change as well as the ec.
That at first start up reasonably with in the first hour to two the 500 liters would take a significant change! The ppm would go from approx
250 (tap water) to 300 + - . The ec would go from 1 to 1,3-4 , then when the nutrients were added and phosphate , then let cycle .
The more it ran with time the more it gained and then....... it felt as if you were loosing it! The ppm as well! Its like it would just drop off!
Then if you checked later it would appear toall reappear! Its like it needed to cycle 720 degrees or more recapping its own evaluation with pairing and unpairing.
This is where I refer to as ghost like elements. Octaving its values perhaps?
May sound weird but there is some thing there! I gave the project to group of students from the University. They said they would keep me apprised.
Hopefully this makes some sense !
Bart
________________________________
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →