Fwd: Re: thorium rods I just love having an archeive of dialog

https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3730?cacheBust=1507869830771 Art, 
You will appreciate My and Bert Pools interest in the Phase Conjugate 
Mirror, laser test with Barium Titinate crystals and wedge mirrors, 
Satellite Killer Weapon, Article, Scientific American.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: 	13 2018 <>
X-Mozilla-Status: 	0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 	00800000
X-Mozilla-Keys: 	
Subject: 	Re: thorium rods
To: 	Mick <[email protected]>
References: 	<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]>
From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
Message-ID: 	<[email protected]>
Date: 	Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:47:12 -0500
User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 	1.0
In-Reply-To: 	<[email protected]>
Content-Type: 	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 	8bit
Content-Language: 	en-US



I did buy Thorium rods for the Tesla Nitrogen MHD Generator as described 
by William Lynn.


On 4/25/2018 12:07 PM, Mick wrote:
> Sorry Norm, I could have sworn you were buying some thorium rods for
> something.  I suppose I am confused.
>
> Yes Rich Fredrich learned most everything about charging from a flyback
> from Bedini and is boring as hell, not sure how you made it through a
> seminar of his. At least he is productive though and I think more
> thorough.  Back in the 80's I called Bedini a few times when I told him
> I was a fellow audio engineer he became really rude so I did not bother
> with him again.  I don't care how good someones technology is if they
> can't have proper manners I have no time.  Bedini and Bearden came out
> with interesting things almost 40 years ago but have not done squat with
> it.  The MEG certainly and I assume part of your MRA idea were takes on
> the Sweet device which was a improvement on the Radus boots. Bedini was
> a new take on Benitez so round and round we go.  Jerry poo pooed your
> device and Hector's too.  Jerry was a complex guy sometimes for a minute
> I doubt his veracity and then catch myself and think no way the guy was
> solid.
>
> Any ways to condition the spikes for scope viewing?  What you are saying
> with the reciprocal provides for some freaky rabbit holes, or should I
> say worm holes... I thought it might be a mirror boundary wave similar
> to a laser through barium titinate mirror like the link below but
> seemingly there is more to it.  If a shaded pole motor runs backwards
> then the event should be view able on a magnetometer.
>
> https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3730?cacheBust=1507869830771
>
> Hey congrats on your Son's gig!  The seafloor should be full of amazing
> stuff of high specific gravity, surprised it's taken so long.
>
>
>
> On 4/25/2018 5:44 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> I did not like messing with high thorium rods because of the hazards
>> of breathing fine particles.   BTW!  Don Smith was on to harnessing
>> earth natural magnetic fields but had such a crude way to approach
>> subject.  Jerry Decker Poo Pooed his early efforts. I went to a Rick
>> Frederich seminar and was not impressed since it was all Bedini
>> re-visited!   Yep! it all circles back to Bearden MEG and the MRA.
>> When Joel & I visited Tom at Huntsville and gave him a working MRA, He
>> told us of his plan to develop and patent the MEG!    Please watch
>> simple shaded pole motors in the presence of a Neutral Spike and you
>> will see them run backwards. They do not need to be turned on, simply
>> hooked to neutral side of line.  This is the sure fire sign of a
>> serious Neutral Spike generated.  BTW!  You cannot  see a Neutral
>> Spike on a scope because it is the reciprocal or inverse of
>> electromagnetic energy.  Magneto-electric as defined by Dr. John
>> Milewski!
>>
>>
>> On 4/24/2018 10:19 PM, Mick wrote:
>>> Hi Norm,
>>>
>>> Looks like Yahoo is messing with us, wonder why...
>>>
>>> What are you up to with the tig 4 percent rods?
>>>
>>> On another note, what are your feelings on the Don Smith device, Jerry
>>> thought he was a bullshit artist?  I have a feeling he may have got it
>>> right with your neutral spike but did not know the ins and outs so could
>>> not reliably replicate, but that is just an intuitive guess.
>>> After speaking to Rick Frederich for awhile and thinking about my couple
>>> unpleasant interactions with Bedini, John may have been a gatekeeper.
>>> I also find it suspicious that on Tom Bearden's site when he brings up
>>> the Radus mag boots and makes a big deal about suppression and lists the
>>> alleged sparse documentation, blatantly missing is the patent which is
>>> very easy to search.  When I searched it and looked at the list of
>>> patents that named it right there sure as shit is Bearden's MEG
>>>
>>> Have been messing with strobe Xenon triggered coil to 6ft ground rod,
>>> have not been able to discern a second pulse on the scope but it's
>>> tripping my ground faults of my pool so I know something is going on.
>>> Maybe I need a second rod...  Not sure of delay length or pulse shape
>>> yet but working on it.
>>>
>>> Take care,
>>>
>>> Mick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Great link Norm, they have been hiding this since SA came out.  I
thought we were all going to have lasers on our roofs rather than
micro-dishes after I read it back when we had the 12 foot dishes
everywhere.  There was an incident in Afghanistan where someone with a
backpack mountable system took out one of our birds. Assume it was
Russian designed and using PCM based on the alleged damage which pointed
to a high power laser.  I think the thing punched through the skin of
the spacecraft but don't quite recall.  The beam was triangulated down
to a footpath in the mountains so it was likely brumby mounted or on
someones back.
Also back when the Scientific American article came out I was working in
lasers.  I tried to get optical grade BT everywhere, no luck.   We were
able to see the argon laser at a university with the BT demo just like
the article.  The Professor said if you think that is something you
should see Lead Zirconate, what do you mean we said, I can't really talk
about it...

On 2/3/2019 7:08 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3730?cacheBust=1507869830771  
> Art, You will appreciate My and Bert Pools interest in the Phase
> Conjugate Mirror, laser test with Barium Titinate crystals and wedge
> mirrors, Satellite Killer Weapon, Article, Scientific American.
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: 	13 2018 <>
> X-Mozilla-Status: 	0001
> X-Mozilla-Status2: 	00800000
> X-Mozilla-Keys: 	
> Subject: 	Re: thorium rods
> To: 	Mick <[email protected]>
> References: 	<[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> From: 	Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: 	<[email protected]>
> Date: 	Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:47:12 -0500
> User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0)
> Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
> MIME-Version: 	1.0
> In-Reply-To: 	<[email protected]>
> Content-Type: 	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 	8bit
> Content-Language: 	en-US
>
>
>
> I did buy Thorium rods for the Tesla Nitrogen MHD Generator as
> described by William Lynn.
>
>
> On 4/25/2018 12:07 PM, Mick wrote:
>> Sorry Norm, I could have sworn you were buying some thorium rods for
>> something.  I suppose I am confused.
>>
>> Yes Rich Fredrich learned most everything about charging from a flyback
>> from Bedini and is boring as hell, not sure how you made it through a
>> seminar of his. At least he is productive though and I think more
>> thorough.  Back in the 80's I called Bedini a few times when I told him
>> I was a fellow audio engineer he became really rude so I did not bother
>> with him again.  I don't care how good someones technology is if they
>> can't have proper manners I have no time.  Bedini and Bearden came out
>> with interesting things almost 40 years ago but have not done squat with
>> it.  The MEG certainly and I assume part of your MRA idea were takes on
>> the Sweet device which was a improvement on the Radus boots.  Bedini was
>> a new take on Benitez so round and round we go.  Jerry poo pooed your
>> device and Hector's too.  Jerry was a complex guy sometimes for a minute
>> I doubt his veracity and then catch myself and think no way the guy was
>> solid.
>>
>> Any ways to condition the spikes for scope viewing?  What you are saying
>> with the reciprocal provides for some freaky rabbit holes, or should I
>> say worm holes... I thought it might be a mirror boundary wave similar
>> to a laser through barium titinate mirror like the link below but
>> seemingly there is more to it.  If a shaded pole motor runs backwards
>> then the event should be view able on a magnetometer.
>>
>> https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3730?cacheBust=1507869830771
>>
>> Hey congrats on your Son's gig!  The seafloor should be full of amazing
>> stuff of high specific gravity, surprised it's taken so long.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/2018 5:44 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>> I did not like messing with high thorium rods because of the hazards
>>> of breathing fine particles.   BTW!  Don Smith was on to harnessing
>>> earth natural magnetic fields but had such a crude way to approach
>>> subject.  Jerry Decker Poo Pooed his early efforts. I went to a Rick
>>> Frederich seminar and was not impressed since it was all Bedini
>>> re-visited!   Yep! it all circles back to Bearden MEG and the MRA.
>>> When Joel & I visited Tom at Huntsville and gave him a working MRA, He
>>> told us of his plan to develop and patent the MEG!    Please watch
>>> simple shaded pole motors in the presence of a Neutral Spike and you
>>> will see them run backwards. They do not need to be turned on, simply
>>> hooked to neutral side of line.  This is the sure fire sign of a
>>> serious Neutral Spike generated.  BTW!  You cannot  see a Neutral
>>> Spike on a scope because it is the reciprocal or inverse of
>>> electromagnetic energy.  Magneto-electric as defined by Dr. John
>>> Milewski!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/24/2018 10:19 PM, Mick wrote:
>>>> Hi Norm,
>>>>
>>>> Looks like Yahoo is messing with us, wonder why...
>>>>
>>>> What are you up to with the tig 4 percent rods?
>>>>
>>>> On another note, what are your feelings on the Don Smith device, Jerry
>>>> thought he was a bullshit artist?  I have a feeling he may have got it
>>>> right with your neutral spike but did not know the ins and outs so
>>>> could
>>>> not reliably replicate, but that is just an intuitive guess.
>>>> After speaking to Rick Frederich for awhile and thinking about my
>>>> couple
>>>> unpleasant interactions with Bedini, John may have been a gatekeeper.
>>>> I also find it suspicious that on Tom Bearden's site when he brings up
>>>> the Radus mag boots and makes a big deal about suppression and
>>>> lists the
>>>> alleged sparse documentation, blatantly missing is the patent which is
>>>> very easy to search.  When I searched it and looked at the list of
>>>> patents that named it right there sure as shit is Bearden's MEG
>>>>
>>>> Have been messing with strobe Xenon triggered coil to 6ft ground rod,
>>>> have not been able to discern a second pulse on the scope but it's
>>>> tripping my ground faults of my pool so I know something is going on.
>>>> Maybe I need a second rod...  Not sure of delay length or pulse shape
>>>> yet but working on it.
>>>>
>>>> Take care,
>>>>
>>>> Mick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>