Body
https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3730?cacheBust=1507869830771 Art,
You will appreciate My and Bert Pools interest in the Phase Conjugate
Mirror, laser test with Barium Titinate crystals and wedge mirrors,
Satellite Killer Weapon, Article, Scientific American.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: 13 2018 <>
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Subject: Re: thorium rods
To: Mick <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:47:12 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
I did buy Thorium rods for the Tesla Nitrogen MHD Generator as described
by William Lynn.
On 4/25/2018 12:07 PM, Mick wrote:
> Sorry Norm, I could have sworn you were buying some thorium rods for
> something. I suppose I am confused.
>
> Yes Rich Fredrich learned most everything about charging from a flyback
> from Bedini and is boring as hell, not sure how you made it through a
> seminar of his. At least he is productive though and I think more
> thorough. Back in the 80's I called Bedini a few times when I told him
> I was a fellow audio engineer he became really rude so I did not bother
> with him again. I don't care how good someones technology is if they
> can't have proper manners I have no time. Bedini and Bearden came out
> with interesting things almost 40 years ago but have not done squat with
> it. The MEG certainly and I assume part of your MRA idea were takes on
> the Sweet device which was a improvement on the Radus boots. Bedini was
> a new take on Benitez so round and round we go. Jerry poo pooed your
> device and Hector's too. Jerry was a complex guy sometimes for a minute
> I doubt his veracity and then catch myself and think no way the guy was
> solid.
>
> Any ways to condition the spikes for scope viewing? What you are saying
> with the reciprocal provides for some freaky rabbit holes, or should I
> say worm holes... I thought it might be a mirror boundary wave similar
> to a laser through barium titinate mirror like the link below but
> seemingly there is more to it. If a shaded pole motor runs backwards
> then the event should be view able on a magnetometer.
>
> https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3730?cacheBust=1507869830771
>
> Hey congrats on your Son's gig! The seafloor should be full of amazing
> stuff of high specific gravity, surprised it's taken so long.
>
>
>
> On 4/25/2018 5:44 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> I did not like messing with high thorium rods because of the hazards
>> of breathing fine particles. BTW! Don Smith was on to harnessing
>> earth natural magnetic fields but had such a crude way to approach
>> subject. Jerry Decker Poo Pooed his early efforts. I went to a Rick
>> Frederich seminar and was not impressed since it was all Bedini
>> re-visited! Yep! it all circles back to Bearden MEG and the MRA.
>> When Joel & I visited Tom at Huntsville and gave him a working MRA, He
>> told us of his plan to develop and patent the MEG! Please watch
>> simple shaded pole motors in the presence of a Neutral Spike and you
>> will see them run backwards. They do not need to be turned on, simply
>> hooked to neutral side of line. This is the sure fire sign of a
>> serious Neutral Spike generated. BTW! You cannot see a Neutral
>> Spike on a scope because it is the reciprocal or inverse of
>> electromagnetic energy. Magneto-electric as defined by Dr. John
>> Milewski!
>>
>>
>> On 4/24/2018 10:19 PM, Mick wrote:
>>> Hi Norm,
>>>
>>> Looks like Yahoo is messing with us, wonder why...
>>>
>>> What are you up to with the tig 4 percent rods?
>>>
>>> On another note, what are your feelings on the Don Smith device, Jerry
>>> thought he was a bullshit artist? I have a feeling he may have got it
>>> right with your neutral spike but did not know the ins and outs so could
>>> not reliably replicate, but that is just an intuitive guess.
>>> After speaking to Rick Frederich for awhile and thinking about my couple
>>> unpleasant interactions with Bedini, John may have been a gatekeeper.
>>> I also find it suspicious that on Tom Bearden's site when he brings up
>>> the Radus mag boots and makes a big deal about suppression and lists the
>>> alleged sparse documentation, blatantly missing is the patent which is
>>> very easy to search. When I searched it and looked at the list of
>>> patents that named it right there sure as shit is Bearden's MEG
>>>
>>> Have been messing with strobe Xenon triggered coil to 6ft ground rod,
>>> have not been able to discern a second pulse on the scope but it's
>>> tripping my ground faults of my pool so I know something is going on.
>>> Maybe I need a second rod... Not sure of delay length or pulse shape
>>> yet but working on it.
>>>
>>> Take care,
>>>
>>> Mick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>