Re: Norm's Wired.com article

Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I contacted 
a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I called a "Light 
magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.   Looks like I was on the right 
track back then. Joel said it had a light channel. The Magneto-electric 
effect was the correct research path.  Had we known about the 
Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then, the whole story 
would have been altered.  The "pressure-induced magnetic phase 
transition."should be very interesting approach for You and Phil since 
you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber) which provides the more 
than 23GPa over pressures to  get the magnetic field conversion effect.  
The Z pinch effect provides the same over pressures that you would get 
with high speed explosives but probably much faster, down in the nano 
sec. range. The PLUS + for you is you don't have to deal with TNT.  Lol 
Please read these references to see why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.

BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak resonant 
range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect getting the flux 
conversion pressures for possible reconnect phenomenon. They did it in 
the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water just as Joel and I got in my 
Sonodiffuser. 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices 
Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop action 
strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV, Blue wave length.

See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap

https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759

https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition


On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>
> Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article 
> <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to in the 
> e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and out-of-place.  
> Maybe.  Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really weird and out-of-place/.
>
> The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium 
> magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents. But please re-read 
> this paragraph from the article:
>
> /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like the 
> ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile Research 
> Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on to *lead 
> zirconate titanate magnets*. The current state of the art is described 
> as a//completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage nanosecond 
> pulse-generating system 
> <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//, 
> occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>
> Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also 
> known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>
> This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate 
> titanate _*magnets*_. As far as I know, there is no such thing as a 
> lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the original 
> MRA PZT's.  Now, perhaps the author of the article is probably just 
> accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat out made a 
> mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet. But *someone* he talked 
> to mentioned using PZT in these explosive experiments - because no one 
> just accidentally spits out "lead zirconate titanate" in casual 
> conversation, especially when the topic is specifically blowing up 
> neodymium magnets - which normally has nothing whatsoever to do with 
> piezoelectric crystals!
>
> Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate that 
> over-unity pulse. . . . .   :>)
>
> Bert
>
>
> /
> /
>
> /
> /
>
> /
> /
>
> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This document 
>> is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.    My prime 
>> interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which according to 
>> the Wired article produces a stream of particles that can be focused 
>> and channeled to a target. My question is, What are the particles 
>> that composed the magnetic flux before destruction and do they comply 
>> with the SUPER LIGHT theory.  Folks, this is whole new ball game if 
>> we can create vast energy from directly destroying magnet flux. Kone, 
>> just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla one inch cube magnets and have a 
>> direct generation of "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition." 
>> electric output in KV @ KA. BTW, this is one for Ole to comment on.  Lol
>>
>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look at 
>>> this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ In the 
>>> old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV capacitor 
>>> bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful magnetic flux 
>>> field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP 
>>> (Magneto-electric pulse).  It  reasoned that the new family of Neo 
>>> magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the heavy 
>>> capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast explosive , 
>>> Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the nanosecond range 
>>> needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted into particle flux 
>>> which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>
>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux 
>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon.  Here is a first step into 
>>>> learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just build 
>>>> sensors. See attachment.   Now that you have a sensor lets look at 
>>>> the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very powerful 
>>>> neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember that energy cannot be 
>>>> destroyed but can convert into another form of energy we call the 
>>>> Magnetoelectric EMP.  See 
>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator 
>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field 
>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage of 
>>>>> iron phase shift.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>
>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>
>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>
>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>
>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>
>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>
>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>
>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>
>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>
>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>
>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>
>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>
>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>
>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>
>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>
>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>
>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>
>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>
>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>
>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>
>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>
>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>
>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>
>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>
>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>
>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>
>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>
>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>
>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>
>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>
>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>
>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>
>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>
>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>
>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>
>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>
>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>
>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>
>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>
>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>
>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>
>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>
>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>
>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>
>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>
>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>
>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>
>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>
>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>
>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>
>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>
>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>
>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>
>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>
>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>
>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>
>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>
>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>
>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>
>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>
>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>
>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>
>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>
>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>
>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>
>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>
>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>
>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>
>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>
>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>
>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>
>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>
>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>
>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>
>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>
>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>
>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>
>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>
>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>
>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>
>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>
>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>
>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>
>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>
>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>
>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>
>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>
>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>
>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>
>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>
>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>
>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>
>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>
>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>
>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>
>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>
>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>
>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>
>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>
>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>
>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>
>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>
>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>
>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>
>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>
>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>
>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>
>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>
>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>
>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>
>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>
>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>
>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>
>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>
>>>>

An added note to Moray King regarding the vortex-anti vortex reconnect 
phenomenon in water.  When I was working in Joseph Bender's lab, he had 
a book written on the Schauberger Implosion Vortex Electrical corona 
effects at the output of the vortex. (Electro-magnetic).  Little known 
is the fact that in an implosion vortex the pressures approach infinity 
in the needle fine vortex core which causes the dissociation of the 
water molecules and the recombining explosion (H-H-O) which yields the 
emission of photons in the UV, blue range of light.  Joel was fascinated 
by the fact that the water flowing around in the Sonodiffuser tygon 
tubing was magnetized. The plasma introduced the magnetism into the 
event since there is such a powerful magnetic current in plasma.

On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I 
> contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I called 
> a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.  Looks like I was on 
> the right track back then. Joel said it had a light channel. The 
> Magneto-electric effect was the correct research path.  Had we known 
> about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then, the 
> whole story would have been altered.  The "pressure-induced magnetic 
> phase transition."should be very interesting approach for You and Phil 
> since you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber) which provides 
> the more than 23GPa over pressures to  get the magnetic field 
> conversion effect.  The Z pinch effect provides the same over 
> pressures that you would get with high speed explosives but probably 
> much faster, down in the nano sec. range. The PLUS + for you is you 
> don't have to deal with TNT.  Lol Please read these references to see 
> why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.
>
> BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak resonant 
> range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect getting the 
> flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect phenomenon. They did 
> it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water just as Joel and I got 
> in my Sonodiffuser. 
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices 
> Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop 
> action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV, Blue 
> wave length.
>
> See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf
>
> https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
>
> https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
>
> https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
>
>
> On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>
>> Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article 
>> <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to in the 
>> e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and out-of-place.  
>> Maybe.  Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really weird and 
>> out-of-place/.
>>
>> The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium 
>> magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents. But please re-read 
>> this paragraph from the article:
>>
>> /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like 
>> the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile Research 
>> Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on to *lead 
>> zirconate titanate magnets*. The current state of the art is 
>> described as a//completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage 
>> nanosecond pulse-generating system 
>> <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//, 
>> occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>>
>> Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also 
>> known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>>
>> This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate 
>> titanate _*magnets*_.  As far as I know, there is no such thing as a 
>> lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the original 
>> MRA PZT's. Now, perhaps the author of the article is probably just 
>> accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat out made a 
>> mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet.  But *someone* he 
>> talked to mentioned using PZT in these explosive experiments - 
>> because no one just accidentally spits out "lead zirconate titanate" 
>> in casual conversation, especially when the topic is specifically 
>> blowing up neodymium magnets - which normally has nothing whatsoever 
>> to do with piezoelectric crystals!
>>
>> Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate 
>> that over-unity pulse. . . . .   :>)
>>
>> Bert
>>
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This document 
>>> is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.    My prime 
>>> interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which according to 
>>> the Wired article produces a stream of particles that can be focused 
>>> and channeled to a target. My question is, What are the particles 
>>> that composed the magnetic flux before destruction and do they 
>>> comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory.  Folks, this is whole new ball 
>>> game if we can create vast energy from directly destroying magnet 
>>> flux.   Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla one inch cube 
>>> magnets and have a direct generation of "pressure-induced magnetic 
>>> phase transition." electric output in KV @ KA.     BTW, this is one 
>>> for Ole to comment on.  Lol
>>>
>>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look at 
>>>> this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ In 
>>>> the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV 
>>>> capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful 
>>>> magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP 
>>>> (Magneto-electric pulse).  It reasoned that the new family of Neo 
>>>> magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the heavy 
>>>> capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast explosive , 
>>>> Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the nanosecond range 
>>>> needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted into particle flux 
>>>> which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>>
>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux 
>>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon.  Here is a first step into 
>>>>> learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just build 
>>>>> sensors. See attachment.   Now that you have a sensor lets look at 
>>>>> the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very powerful 
>>>>> neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember that energy cannot be 
>>>>> destroyed but can convert into another form of energy we call the 
>>>>> Magnetoelectric EMP.  See 
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator 
>>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field 
>>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage 
>>>>>> of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>
>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>
>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>
>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>
>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>
>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>
>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>
>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>
>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>
>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>
>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>
>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>
>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>
>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>
>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>
>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>
>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>
>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>
>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>
>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>
>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>
>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>
>>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>
>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>
>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>
>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>
>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>
>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>
>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>
>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>
>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>
>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>
>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>
>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>

I have been on the EVGRAY Yahoo Group since Doug set it up after the 
2001 Keely Net Conference in Dallas.  Here is an example of the Cannon 
Fodder you have to put up with when you do open source experimentation. 
See    Hector's RV Replication.

On 1/3/2005 9:23 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> Dear Earl:  I'll try to be respectful to you inspite of your absolutely
> ridiculous questions.
> First of all I will state again for the nth time that I am not
> interested in pursuing the research of
> others.   Hector asked anyone out there on the net to do his RV
> experiment to verify that the RV
> displays O/U output.   I did the experiment 2 years ago and posted the
> results on the net on the
> KeelyNet web site.  The results were also discussed on the various Yahoo
> Groups.  I have no desire to
> build RV units and am not selling power nor am I off the grid.   The RV
> is so easy to put together and
> cost so little to gather the necessary parts that I am quite confident
> that a man of your extensive
> knowledge and expertise can do this simple test and gather your own data
> just the way you like it.
> I chose to use the RV as the prime mover to drive a simple "low lenz" PM
> disk motor as a generator
> so that the output side of the energy equation was pure "filtered" DC
> which when dissipated into a pure
> resistive load would enable any simple idiot the ability to measure
> output.  Is that simple enough
> for you as an "arm chair" critic to assimilate.   Get a grasp on
> reality.   I believe that Ken Carrigan
> stated the case correctly with his statement to me regarding power
> factor.   If the power factor was anything
> other than 1:1 "unity" then the O/U would in fact be greater than my
> calculations.   The power in my
> lab is absolutely "unity" 1:1.   Since I have thousands of pounds of all
> size caps, if it were not unity, I could
> make it so in a matter of minutes.   I have far too much going on in my
> life to spend any time on photographing
> scope traces and experimental data to give out to people whom are too
> lazy to get off their asses and do the
> experiment themselves.   Your questions to me have demonstrated to
> everyone on this list the true nature of the person
> known as Earl.   I suggest you "back off" and go do your research and
> read the posted report.
> P.S.:  I have stated many times during the RV discussions that you
> cannot heavily load a RV because it will
> not display O/U if you drop the RPM below the design slip speed.
> Remember you are dealing with a rotary
> phase resonance situation.  Fine tuning with the correct cap values
> brings the current down to an absolute minimum
> for each running condition under which you want to gather data.  Change
> the loading requires an adjustment to the
> circuit capacitance.
> Norm
>
> Earl Lagergren wrote:
>
>> Hi Norman,
>>
>> Since there is a rumor floating around that you have peer-reviewed the
>> RV and confirmed OU, I have some questions for you:
>>
>> 1) Did you test the RV **under heavy mechanical load** and find it to
>> be OU ?  How much OU?  When was this test?  If in 2002, what news do
>> you have to add now in 2005?  Please bring us up-to-date with latest
>> news and insights.
>>
>> 2) What are you presently doing with the RV?
>>
>> 3) Are you able to sell enough energy from OU RVs to retire and pay the
>> bills exclusively from RV-generated income?
>>
>> 4) Are you still connected to the grid?
>>
>> 5) Where can I find the complete RV test report, including exact test
>> setups, schematics, photos, utilized measuring equipment, etc. ? A
>> report from 2002 used Amps without mentioning DC, RMS, peak, peak to
>> peak, etc.
>>
>> 6) If your testing involved calculations of AC waveform powers, can
>> you provide scope photos, phase angles, etc. and how you calculated
>> power?
>>
>> 7) Did you check waveform shapes with a scope?
>>
>> Best regards, Earl
>>
>>   
>>
>
>
>   
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
On 1/4/2019 7:21 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> An added note to Moray King regarding the vortex-anti vortex reconnect 
> phenomenon in water.  When I was working in Joseph Bender's lab, he 
> had a book written on the Schauberger Implosion Vortex Electrical 
> corona effects at the output of the vortex. (Electro-magnetic).  
> Little known is the fact that in an implosion vortex the pressures 
> approach infinity in the needle fine vortex core which causes the 
> dissociation of the water molecules and the recombining explosion 
> (H-H-O) which yields the emission of photons in the UV, blue range of 
> light.  Joel was fascinated by the fact that the water flowing around 
> in the Sonodiffuser tygon tubing was magnetized. The plasma introduced 
> the magnetism into the event since there is such a powerful magnetic 
> current in plasma.
>
> On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I 
>> contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I 
>> called a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.   Looks like I 
>> was on the right track back then. Joel said it had a light channel. 
>> The Magneto-electric effect was the correct research path. Had we 
>> known about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then, 
>> the whole story would have been altered.  The "pressure-induced 
>> magnetic phase transition."should be very interesting approach for 
>> You and Phil since you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber) 
>> which provides the more than 23GPa over pressures to  get the 
>> magnetic field conversion effect. The Z pinch effect provides the 
>> same over pressures that you would get with high speed explosives but 
>> probably much faster, down in the nano sec. range. The PLUS + for you 
>> is you don't have to deal with TNT.  Lol Please read these references 
>> to see why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.
>>
>> BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak 
>> resonant range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect 
>> getting the flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect 
>> phenomenon. They did it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water 
>> just as Joel and I got in my Sonodiffuser. 
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices 
>> Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop 
>> action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV, 
>> Blue wave length.
>>
>> See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf
>>
>> https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
>>
>> https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
>>
>> https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
>>
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article 
>>> <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to in 
>>> the e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and 
>>> out-of-place.  Maybe.  Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really 
>>> weird and out-of-place/.
>>>
>>> The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium 
>>> magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents.  But please 
>>> re-read this paragraph from the article:
>>>
>>> /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like 
>>> the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile 
>>> Research Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on 
>>> to *lead zirconate titanate magnets*. The current state of the art 
>>> is described as a//completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage 
>>> nanosecond pulse-generating system 
>>> <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//, 
>>> occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>>>
>>> Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also 
>>> known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>>>
>>> This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate 
>>> titanate _*magnets*_.  As far as I know, there is no such thing as a 
>>> lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the original 
>>> MRA PZT's.  Now, perhaps the author of the article is probably just 
>>> accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat out made a 
>>> mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet.  But *someone* he 
>>> talked to mentioned using PZT in these explosive experiments - 
>>> because no one just accidentally spits out "lead zirconate titanate" 
>>> in casual conversation, especially when the topic is specifically 
>>> blowing up neodymium magnets - which normally has nothing whatsoever 
>>> to do with piezoelectric crystals!
>>>
>>> Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate 
>>> that over-unity pulse. . . . .   :>)
>>>
>>> Bert
>>>
>>>
>>> /
>>> /
>>>
>>> /
>>> /
>>>
>>> /
>>> /
>>>
>>> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This 
>>>> document is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.    
>>>> My prime interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which 
>>>> according to the Wired article produces a stream of particles that 
>>>> can be focused and channeled to a target. My question is, What are 
>>>> the particles that composed the magnetic flux before destruction 
>>>> and do they comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory.  Folks, this is 
>>>> whole new ball game if we can create vast energy from directly 
>>>> destroying magnet flux.   Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 
>>>> Tesla one inch cube magnets and have a direct generation of 
>>>> "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition." electric output in KV 
>>>> @ KA.     BTW, this is one for Ole to comment on.  Lol
>>>>
>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look 
>>>>> at this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ 
>>>>> In the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV 
>>>>> capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful 
>>>>> magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP 
>>>>> (Magneto-electric pulse).  It  reasoned that the new family of Neo 
>>>>> magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the heavy 
>>>>> capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast explosive 
>>>>> , Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the nanosecond range 
>>>>> needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted into particle 
>>>>> flux which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux 
>>>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon.  Here is a first step into 
>>>>>> learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just build 
>>>>>> sensors. See attachment. Now that you have a sensor lets look at 
>>>>>> the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very powerful 
>>>>>> neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember that energy cannot be 
>>>>>> destroyed but can convert into another form of energy we call the 
>>>>>> Magnetoelectric EMP.  See 
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator 
>>>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field 
>>>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage 
>>>>>>> of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>>>
>

I'll throw in a few wild cards now and then based on the experimentation 
by Joel and I back in the day. Here is a real goodie for your 
consideration.  Remember Hans Coler?  See

https://rimstar.org/sdenergy/coler/index.htm

*174.925 magnetic frequency*

http://www.rimstar.org/sdenergy/coler/index.htm#MAGNETSTROMAPPARAT


Our measurement of the magnetic frequency ocured while experimenting 
with the MRA.   Interesting that our frequency closely agreed with the 
Tesla Colorado Springs Coil and the findings in the Hans Coler device. 
See Coler narritive.


If now the other winding is connected in series with the pre-magnetized 
steel rod -- as secondary coil -- in such a way that the secondary 
current must pass through the magnet, one half cycle of the secondary 
current must be more or less subdued; in other words, a rectifying 
effect must be created (It may be remembered that according to 
measurements by Professors Kloss and Schumann, a high frequency pulsed 
direct current-- about 180 KHz -- is flowing in the output resistance of 
the apparatus, for the creation of which no other explanation seems 
possible). BTW. The Corum's calculated the operating frequency of the 
Tesla Magnifyer Coil at just under 180 kHz.  As you are are well aware, 
they are the leader of the effort over in Milford, TX. See Zenneck 
Surface Wave.

http://vizivtechnologies.com/technology/

https://www.waxahachietx.com/news/20180611/milford-testing-facility-tower-seeks-to-send-signals-worldwide

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FXZbf2EWxQ&feature=youtu.be

On 1/4/2019 7:54 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> I have been on the EVGRAY Yahoo Group since Doug set it up after the 
> 2001 Keely Net Conference in Dallas.  Here is an example of the Cannon 
> Fodder you have to put up with when you do open source 
> experimentation. See    Hector's RV Replication.
>
> On 1/3/2005 9:23 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> Dear Earl:  I'll try to be respectful to you inspite of your absolutely
>> ridiculous questions.
>> First of all I will state again for the nth time that I am not
>> interested in pursuing the research of
>> others.   Hector asked anyone out there on the net to do his RV
>> experiment to verify that the RV
>> displays O/U output.   I did the experiment 2 years ago and posted the
>> results on the net on the
>> KeelyNet web site.  The results were also discussed on the various Yahoo
>> Groups.  I have no desire to
>> build RV units and am not selling power nor am I off the grid.   The RV
>> is so easy to put together and
>> cost so little to gather the necessary parts that I am quite confident
>> that a man of your extensive
>> knowledge and expertise can do this simple test and gather your own data
>> just the way you like it.
>> I chose to use the RV as the prime mover to drive a simple "low lenz" PM
>> disk motor as a generator
>> so that the output side of the energy equation was pure "filtered" DC
>> which when dissipated into a pure
>> resistive load would enable any simple idiot the ability to measure
>> output.  Is that simple enough
>> for you as an "arm chair" critic to assimilate.   Get a grasp on
>> reality.   I believe that Ken Carrigan
>> stated the case correctly with his statement to me regarding power
>> factor.   If the power factor was anything
>> other than 1:1 "unity" then the O/U would in fact be greater than my
>> calculations.   The power in my
>> lab is absolutely "unity" 1:1.   Since I have thousands of pounds of all
>> size caps, if it were not unity, I could
>> make it so in a matter of minutes.   I have far too much going on in my
>> life to spend any time on photographing
>> scope traces and experimental data to give out to people whom are too
>> lazy to get off their asses and do the
>> experiment themselves.   Your questions to me have demonstrated to
>> everyone on this list the true nature of the person
>> known as Earl.   I suggest you "back off" and go do your research and
>> read the posted report.
>> P.S.:  I have stated many times during the RV discussions that you
>> cannot heavily load a RV because it will
>> not display O/U if you drop the RPM below the design slip speed.
>> Remember you are dealing with a rotary
>> phase resonance situation.  Fine tuning with the correct cap values
>> brings the current down to an absolute minimum
>> for each running condition under which you want to gather data.  Change
>> the loading requires an adjustment to the
>> circuit capacitance.
>> Norm
>>
>> Earl Lagergren wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Norman,
>>>
>>> Since there is a rumor floating around that you have peer-reviewed the
>>> RV and confirmed OU, I have some questions for you:
>>>
>>> 1) Did you test the RV **under heavy mechanical load** and find it to
>>> be OU ?  How much OU?  When was this test?  If in 2002, what news do
>>> you have to add now in 2005?  Please bring us up-to-date with latest
>>> news and insights.
>>>
>>> 2) What are you presently doing with the RV?
>>>
>>> 3) Are you able to sell enough energy from OU RVs to retire and pay the
>>> bills exclusively from RV-generated income?
>>>
>>> 4) Are you still connected to the grid?
>>>
>>> 5) Where can I find the complete RV test report, including exact test
>>> setups, schematics, photos, utilized measuring equipment, etc. ? A
>>> report from 2002 used Amps without mentioning DC, RMS, peak, peak to
>>> peak, etc.
>>>
>>> 6) If your testing involved calculations of AC waveform powers, can
>>> you provide scope photos, phase angles, etc. and how you calculated
>>> power?
>>>
>>> 7) Did you check waveform shapes with a scope?
>>>
>>> Best regards, Earl
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>   
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> On 1/4/2019 7:21 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> An added note to Moray King regarding the vortex-anti vortex 
>> reconnect phenomenon in water.  When I was working in Joseph Bender's 
>> lab, he had a book written on the Schauberger Implosion Vortex 
>> Electrical corona effects at the output of the vortex. 
>> (Electro-magnetic).  Little known is the fact that in an implosion 
>> vortex the pressures approach infinity in the needle fine vortex core 
>> which causes the dissociation of the water molecules and the 
>> recombining explosion (H-H-O) which yields the emission of photons in 
>> the UV, blue range of light.  Joel was fascinated by the fact that 
>> the water flowing around in the Sonodiffuser tygon tubing was 
>> magnetized. The plasma introduced the magnetism into the event since 
>> there is such a powerful magnetic current in plasma.
>>
>> On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I 
>>> contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I 
>>> called a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.   Looks like I 
>>> was on the right track back then. Joel said it had a light channel. 
>>> The Magneto-electric effect was the correct research path.  Had we 
>>> known about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then, 
>>> the whole story would have been altered.  The "pressure-induced 
>>> magnetic phase transition."should be very interesting approach for 
>>> You and Phil since you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber) 
>>> which provides the more than 23GPa over pressures to  get the 
>>> magnetic field conversion effect.  The Z pinch effect provides the 
>>> same over pressures that you would get with high speed explosives 
>>> but probably much faster, down in the nano sec. range. The PLUS + 
>>> for you is you don't have to deal with TNT.  Lol Please read these 
>>> references to see why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.
>>>
>>> BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak 
>>> resonant range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect 
>>> getting the flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect 
>>> phenomenon. They did it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water 
>>> just as Joel and I got in my Sonodiffuser. 
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices 
>>> Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop 
>>> action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV, 
>>> Blue wave length.
>>>
>>> See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf
>>>
>>> https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
>>>
>>> https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
>>>
>>> https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
>>>
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article 
>>>> <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to in 
>>>> the e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and 
>>>> out-of-place.  Maybe. Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really 
>>>> weird and out-of-place/.
>>>>
>>>> The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium 
>>>> magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents.  But please 
>>>> re-read this paragraph from the article:
>>>>
>>>> /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like 
>>>> the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile 
>>>> Research Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on 
>>>> to *lead zirconate titanate magnets*. The current state of the art 
>>>> is described as a//completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage 
>>>> nanosecond pulse-generating system 
>>>> <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//, 
>>>> occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>>>>
>>>> Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also 
>>>> known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>>>>
>>>> This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate 
>>>> titanate _*magnets*_.  As far as I know, there is no such thing as 
>>>> a lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the 
>>>> original MRA PZT's.  Now, perhaps the author of the article is 
>>>> probably just accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat 
>>>> out made a mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet.  But 
>>>> *someone* he talked to mentioned using PZT in these explosive 
>>>> experiments - because no one just accidentally spits out "lead 
>>>> zirconate titanate" in casual conversation, especially when the 
>>>> topic is specifically blowing up neodymium magnets - which normally 
>>>> has nothing whatsoever to do with piezoelectric crystals!
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate 
>>>> that over-unity pulse. . . . . :>)
>>>>
>>>> Bert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This 
>>>>> document is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.    
>>>>> My prime interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which 
>>>>> according to the Wired article produces a stream of particles that 
>>>>> can be focused and channeled to a target. My question is, What are 
>>>>> the particles that composed the magnetic flux before destruction 
>>>>> and do they comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory.  Folks, this is 
>>>>> whole new ball game if we can create vast energy from directly 
>>>>> destroying magnet flux. Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla 
>>>>> one inch cube magnets and have a direct generation of 
>>>>> "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition." electric output in 
>>>>> KV @ KA.     BTW, this is one for Ole to comment on.  Lol
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look 
>>>>>> at this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ 
>>>>>> In the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV 
>>>>>> capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful 
>>>>>> magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the 
>>>>>> EMP (Magneto-electric pulse).  It  reasoned that the new family 
>>>>>> of Neo magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the 
>>>>>> heavy capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast 
>>>>>> explosive , Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the 
>>>>>> nanosecond range needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted 
>>>>>> into particle flux which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux 
>>>>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon.  Here is a first step 
>>>>>>> into learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just build 
>>>>>>> sensors. See attachment.   Now that you have a sensor lets look 
>>>>>>> at the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very 
>>>>>>> powerful neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember that energy 
>>>>>>> cannot be destroyed but can convert into another form of energy 
>>>>>>> we call the Magnetoelectric EMP.  See 
>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator 
>>>>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field 
>>>>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage 
>>>>>>>> of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>>>>
>>

Thank You Ole, for I had read about Marcel Vogel and the quartz crystal 
vortex experiment.  Interesting effects.

On 1/4/2019 7:24 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Norman,
>
> "Joel was fascinated by the fact that the water flowing around in the 
> Sonodiffuser tygon tubing was magnetized."
> This reminds me of an experiment done by Marcel Vogel where he spun 
> water through a Pyrex glass tube around a big quarts crystal cut in a 
> special way. Marcel was flung into the wall by some kind of force and 
> found the experiment interesting but wouldn't dare to repeat it. He 
> was around 70 years old and didn't like the effect on his body.
>
> "Although in most cases it was found that water generated a weak 
> magnetic field, on one occasion a different effect was noted. Normally 
> the effects noted above were attained by circulating water through a 
> Pyrex glass tube coiled seven clockwise turns, around a tuned crystal. 
> By reversing the position of the crystal so that the firing tip was 
> pointed upwards, an energy was released that lifted Marcel off the 
> floor and flung him to the wall. He was standing approximately three 
> feet away from the apparatus when this happened. Afterwards his eyes 
> were burned as if from intense radiation. "
>
> Citation and pictures are from here about halfway down the page: 
> http://marcelvogel.org/#squiggle
>
> This force is probably caused by one or more of the fields mentioned 
> by William J. Hooper.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>
> An added note to Moray King regarding the vortex-anti vortex reconnect 
> phenomenon in water.  When I was working in Joseph Bender's lab, he 
> had a book written on the Schauberger Implosion Vortex Electrical 
> corona effects at the output of the vortex. (Electro-magnetic).  
> Little known is the fact that in an implosion vortex the pressures 
> approach infinity in the needle fine vortex core which causes the 
> dissociation of the water molecules and the recombining explosion 
> (H-H-O) which yields the emission of photons in the UV, blue range of 
> light.  Joel was fascinated by the fact that the water flowing around 
> in the Sonodiffuser tygon tubing was magnetized. The plasma introduced 
> the magnetism into the event since there is such a powerful magnetic 
> current in plasma.
>
> On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
>>     Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I
>>     contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I
>>     called a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.   Looks
>>     like I was on the right track back then. Joel said it had a light
>>     channel. The Magneto-electric effect was the correct research
>>     path.  Had we known about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect)
>>     effect back then, the whole story would have been altered. The
>>     "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition."should be very
>>     interesting approach for You and Phil since you have the Z pinch
>>     (quarter shrinking chamber) which provides the more than 23GPa
>>     over pressures to  get the magnetic field conversion effect.  The
>>     Z pinch effect provides the same over pressures that you would
>>     get with high speed explosives but probably much faster, down in
>>     the nano sec. range. The PLUS + for you is you don't have to deal
>>     with TNT.  Lol Please read these references to see why the Army
>>     Boys were blowing up PZT.
>>
>>     BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak
>>     resonant range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect
>>     getting the flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect
>>     phenomenon. They did it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in
>>     water just as Joel and I got in my Sonodiffuser.
>>     https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices
>>     Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop
>>     action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV,
>>     Blue wave length.
>>
>>     See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf
>>
>>     https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
>>
>>     https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
>>
>>     https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
>>
>>     https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
>>
>>
>>     On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>>
>>>     Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article
>>>     <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to
>>>     in the e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and
>>>     out-of-place.  Maybe. Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really
>>>     weird and out-of-place/.
>>>
>>>     The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium
>>>     magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents.  But please
>>>     re-read this paragraph from the article:
>>>
>>>     /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets
>>>     (like the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and
>>>     Missile Research Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec)
>>>     have moved on to *lead zirconate titanate magnets*. The current
>>>     state of the art is described as a//completely explosive
>>>     ultracompact high-voltage nanosecond pulse-generating system
>>>     <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//,
>>>     occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>>>
>>>     Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate
>>>     (also known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>>>
>>>     This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate
>>>     titanate _*magnets*_.  As far as I know, there is no such thing
>>>     as a lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the
>>>     original MRA PZT's.  Now, perhaps the author of the article is
>>>     probably just accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just
>>>     flat out made a mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet. 
>>>     But *someone* he talked to mentioned using PZT in these
>>>     explosive experiments - because no one just accidentally spits
>>>     out "lead zirconate titanate" in casual conversation, especially
>>>     when the topic is specifically blowing up neodymium magnets -
>>>     which normally has nothing whatsoever to do with piezoelectric
>>>     crystals!
>>>
>>>     Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to
>>>     generate that over-unity pulse. . . . . :>)
>>>
>>>     Bert
>>>
>>>
>>>     /
>>>     /
>>>
>>>     /
>>>     /
>>>
>>>     /
>>>     /
>>>
>>>     On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This
>>>>     document is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so
>>>>     far.    My prime interest is in the annihilation of magnetic
>>>>     flux which according to the Wired article produces a stream of
>>>>     particles that can be focused and channeled to a target. My
>>>>     question is, What are the particles that composed the magnetic
>>>>     flux before destruction and do they comply with the SUPER LIGHT
>>>>     theory.  Folks, this is whole new ball game if we can create
>>>>     vast energy from directly destroying magnet flux. Kone, just
>>>>     blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla one inch cube magnets and have
>>>>     a direct generation of "pressure-induced magnetic phase
>>>>     transition." electric output in KV @ KA. BTW, this is one for
>>>>     Ole to comment on.  Lol
>>>>
>>>>     On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a
>>>>>     look at this Army doc.
>>>>>     https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ In the old Flux
>>>>>     compression Generators there was a need for HV capacitor bank
>>>>>     and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful magnetic flux
>>>>>     field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP
>>>>>     (Magneto-electric pulse).  It  reasoned that the new family of
>>>>>     Neo magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the
>>>>>     heavy capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast
>>>>>     explosive , Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the
>>>>>     nanosecond range needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux
>>>>>     converted into particle flux which is the constituents of the
>>>>>     magnetic field)
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>     <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux
>>>>>>     annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon. Here is a first step
>>>>>>     into learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just
>>>>>>     build sensors. See attachment.   Now that you have a sensor
>>>>>>     lets look at the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy
>>>>>>     a very powerful neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember
>>>>>>     that energy cannot be destroyed but can convert into another
>>>>>>     form of energy we call the Magnetoelectric EMP.  See
>>>>>>     https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator
>>>>>>     This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field
>>>>>>     directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took
>>>>>>>     advantage of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>
>

> This reminds me of an experiment done by Marcel Vogel where he spun water through a Pyrex glass tube around a big quarts crystal cut in a special way.

Vogel Crystals?  Several photos of the protege of Vogel's collection:

http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1637.JPG.html

http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1638.JPG.html

http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1639.JPG.html

http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1640.JPG.html

http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1633.JPG.html

Several others...

Lowest cost one about $7, biggest one around $10,000.


Hyperspace was mentioned someplace.
If Hyperspace Navigators get paid by the hour, what is their rate of of pay,
in a place where time has no meaning?

Hi Norman,

"Joel was fascinated by the fact that the water flowing around in the Sonodiffuser tygon tubing was magnetized."
This reminds me of an experiment done by Marcel Vogel where he spun water through a Pyrex glass tube around a big quarts crystal cut in a special way. Marcel was flung into the wall by some kind of force and found the experiment interesting but wouldn't dare to repeat it. He was around 70 years old and didn't like the effect on his body.

"Although in most cases it was found that water generated a weak magnetic field, on one occasion a different effect was noted. Normally the effects noted above were attained by circulating water through a Pyrex glass tube coiled seven clockwise turns, around a tuned crystal. By reversing the position of the crystal so that the firing tip was pointed upwards, an energy was released that lifted Marcel off the floor and flung him to the wall. He was standing approximately three feet away from the apparatus when this happened. Afterwards his eyes were burned as if from intense radiation. "
     
Citation and pictures are from here about halfway down the page: http://marcelvogel.org/#squiggle http://marcelvogel.org/#squiggle

This force is probably caused by one or more of the fields mentioned by William J. Hooper.

Regards
Ole


---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :

 An added note to Moray King regarding the vortex-anti vortex reconnect phenomenon in water.  When I was working in Joseph Bender's lab, he had a book written on the Schauberger Implosion Vortex Electrical corona effects at the output of the vortex. (Electro-magnetic).  Little known is the fact that in an implosion vortex the pressures approach infinity in the needle fine vortex core which causes the dissociation of the water molecules and the recombining explosion (H-H-O) which yields the emission of photons in the UV, blue range of light.  Joel was fascinated by the fact that the water flowing around in the Sonodiffuser tygon tubing was magnetized. The plasma introduced the magnetism into the event since there is such a powerful magnetic current in plasma.
 
 
 On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
 
 Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I called a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.   Looks like I was on the right track back then. Joel said it had a light channel. The Magneto-electric effect was the correct research path.  Had we known about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then, the whole story would have been altered.  The "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition."should be very interesting approach for You and Phil since you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber) which provides the more than 23GPa over pressures to  get the magnetic field conversion effect.  The Z pinch effect provides the same over pressures that you would get with high speed explosives but probably much faster, down in the nano sec. range. The PLUS + for you is you don't have to deal with TNT.  Lol Please read these references to see why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.
 BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak resonant range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect getting the flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect phenomenon. They did it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water just as Joel and I got in my Sonodiffuser.    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices      Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV, Blue wave length.
 See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf
 
 https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
 https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759 https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
 https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
 
 
 On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
 
 Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article you linked to in the e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and out-of-place.  Maybe.  Well, not just maybe, but yeah, really weird and out-of-place.
 
 The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents.  But please re-read this paragraph from the article:
 Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on to lead zirconate titanate magnets. The current state of the art is described as a completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage nanosecond pulse-generating system, occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch.
 Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.  
 
 This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate titanate magnets.  As far as I know, there is no such thing as a lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the original MRA PZT's.  Now, perhaps the author of the article is probably just accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat out made a mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet.  But someone he talked to mentioned using PZT in these explosive experiments - because no one just accidentally spits out "lead zirconate titanate" in casual conversation, especially when the topic is specifically blowing up neodymium magnets - which normally has nothing whatsoever to do with piezoelectric crystals!
 Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate that over-unity pulse. . . . .   :>)
 
 Bert
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
 
 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon  This document is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.    My prime interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which according to the Wired article produces a stream of particles that can be focused and channeled to a target. My question is, What are the particles that composed the magnetic flux before destruction and do they comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory.  Folks, this is whole new ball game if we can create vast energy from directly destroying magnet flux.   Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla one inch cube magnets and have a direct generation of "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition." electric output in KV @ KA.     BTW, this is one for Ole to comment on.  Lol 
 On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
 
 To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look at this Army doc.  https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/    In the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP (Magneto-electric pulse).  It  reasoned that the new family of Neo magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the heavy capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast explosive , Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the nanosecond range needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted into particle flux which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
 
 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane 
 
 
 
 On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@... mailto:nwootan@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
 
   
 Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon.  Here is a first step into learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just build sensors. See attachment.   Now that you have a sensor lets look at the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very powerful neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember that energy cannot be destroyed but can convert into another form of energy we call the Magnetoelectric EMP.  See  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator  This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field directly into very high power electrical output.
 
 On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
 
 Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage of iron phase shift.
 
 https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator

Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.

This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes. 





                      What is Heat #2
  
  
  
  
 For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
 heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
 liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
 electrical power around the phenomenon.  The reason for this
 interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
 from the ambient background via thermal differentials.  My
 line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
 with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
 electronic cooling devices.  Would you believe that most
 people do not understand how these devices move thermal
 energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
 junction.  Historically we find that German physicist,
 Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
 applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
 electrical energy resulted.  Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
 discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
 dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.  It was not
 until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
 both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
 water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
 melted when the polarity of the direct current was
 reversed.  These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
 years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
 materials which could provide the wide temperature
 differentials.  In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
 available which revived the electric cooling principles.  In
 the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
 devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
 junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
 materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
 thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
 conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
 coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.  The first
 Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
 ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.   With a
 small temperature differential across the device a weak
 current with an attendant voltage was developed.  Increasing
 the differential provided a proportional increase in current
 and voltage.  About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
 wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
 the KeelyNet BBS.   My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
 how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
 junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
 thermal energy across the junction.  This is a directly
 reversible situation based on polarity.
 Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
 refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
 change material such as water and refrigerants.  We have
 always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
 cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
 mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
 condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.  Would
 you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
 provides an attendant electrical effect.   Back in 1840
 Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
 escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
 of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
 Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
 the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
 passing through the nozzles.   After reading an old (1920 s)
 Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
 phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
 not purely mechanical.  The atoms of the material lose or
 gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
 discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
 transitions between phases.  More energy is present after
 the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
 text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
 explained.  When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
 Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
 physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
 of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
 totally not understood by modern science.  Now my suspicions
 were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
 electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
 question of, What is heat?    We were told in the school 
 that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
 of energy.  What is the form of this energy?  Let us look at
 a very simple example of heating which may explain this
 process.  When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
 heated because electrons in the material are converted to
 photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
 leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.  The
 more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.  Now
 the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
 from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
 net negative state or cold.  Heat or cold is based on the
 ion relationship in the material.  When we apply a flame
 (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
 which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
 structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
 Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
 across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
 (ions).  Since the energy is in the form of presence or
 absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
 how the process works.  All phase change processes work the
 same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
 processes which we were taught.  Everything in chemistry is
 an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
 based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
 At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
 we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
 which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
 cooling effects.  Now we see Patents issued based on
 negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
 cool because it becomes net negative charged.  This is a
 very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
 generator operates at very high voltages with very little
 current involved.   It is possible to develop this ion
 transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
 output from very subtle temperature differentials.  Remember
 that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
 differential will cause a development of current and voltage
 as in the Peltier device.   I hope that this dialog will
 provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
 Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
 of experimentation.   Norm

Ole, on EVGRAY Group sent me these photos.  When I was experimenting and 
Patenting my Sonodiffuser, studied Marcel Vogel's work with crystals.  
Interesting guy. Also need to look up Dean and Mary Hardy and their book 
on Pyramid energy.  Also see video 
ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNtZUFhjquw 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNtZUFhjquw>


On 1/4/2019 8:02 PM, Bob Paddock [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> > This reminds me of an experiment done by Marcel Vogel where he spun 
> water through a Pyrex glass tube around a big quarts crystal cut in a 
> special way.
>
> Vogel Crystals? Several photos of the protege of Vogel's collection:
>
> http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1637.JPG.html
>
> http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1638.JPG.html
>
> http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1639.JPG.html
>
> http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1640.JPG.html
>
> http://files.bpaddock.com/tcgms2017/Day6/tn/IMG_1633.JPG.html
>
> Several others...
>
> Lowest cost one about $7, biggest one around $10,000.
>
> Hyperspace was mentioned someplace.
> If Hyperspace Navigators get paid by the hour, what is their rate of 
> of pay,
> in a place where time has no meaning?
>
>

Moray King, Back where my Patent on the Implosion Vortex Hydrogen 
Reactor was being reviewed by International Patent Application, A 
Japanese examiner challenged the vortex principles and called us out 
saying it was centrifugal in operation.    I replied back to him asking 
that he explore Victor Schauberger's works with the implosion vortex, 
(Centripetal not centrifugal)  The problem that researchers have is 
understanding that micro cavitation vortex has a core pressure 
approaching infinity which causes the heating to such high values. 
Pressure results in heat, Vacuum results in cooling.   See the reasoning 
in these videos. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOPCG8M30lI&feature=youtu.be   
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEsJSpru0Bw&feature=youtu.be

On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I 
> contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I called 
> a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.  Looks like I was on 
> the right track back then. Joel said it had a light channel. The 
> Magneto-electric effect was the correct research path.  Had we known 
> about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then, the 
> whole story would have been altered.  The "pressure-induced magnetic 
> phase transition."should be very interesting approach for You and Phil 
> since you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber) which provides 
> the more than 23GPa over pressures to  get the magnetic field 
> conversion effect.  The Z pinch effect provides the same over 
> pressures that you would get with high speed explosives but probably 
> much faster, down in the nano sec. range. The PLUS + for you is you 
> don't have to deal with TNT.  Lol Please read these references to see 
> why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.
>
> BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak resonant 
> range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect getting the 
> flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect phenomenon. They did 
> it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water just as Joel and I got 
> in my Sonodiffuser. 
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices 
> Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop 
> action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV, Blue 
> wave length.
>
> See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf
>
> https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
>
> https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
>
> https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
>
>
> On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>
>> Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article 
>> <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to in the 
>> e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and out-of-place.  
>> Maybe.  Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really weird and 
>> out-of-place/.
>>
>> The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium 
>> magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents. But please re-read 
>> this paragraph from the article:
>>
>> /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like 
>> the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile Research 
>> Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on to *lead 
>> zirconate titanate magnets*. The current state of the art is 
>> described as a//completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage 
>> nanosecond pulse-generating system 
>> <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//, 
>> occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>>
>> Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also 
>> known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>>
>> This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate 
>> titanate _*magnets*_.  As far as I know, there is no such thing as a 
>> lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the original 
>> MRA PZT's. Now, perhaps the author of the article is probably just 
>> accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat out made a 
>> mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet.  But *someone* he 
>> talked to mentioned using PZT in these explosive experiments - 
>> because no one just accidentally spits out "lead zirconate titanate" 
>> in casual conversation, especially when the topic is specifically 
>> blowing up neodymium magnets - which normally has nothing whatsoever 
>> to do with piezoelectric crystals!
>>
>> Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate 
>> that over-unity pulse. . . . .   :>)
>>
>> Bert
>>
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This document 
>>> is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.    My prime 
>>> interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which according to 
>>> the Wired article produces a stream of particles that can be focused 
>>> and channeled to a target. My question is, What are the particles 
>>> that composed the magnetic flux before destruction and do they 
>>> comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory.  Folks, this is whole new ball 
>>> game if we can create vast energy from directly destroying magnet 
>>> flux.   Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla one inch cube 
>>> magnets and have a direct generation of "pressure-induced magnetic 
>>> phase transition." electric output in KV @ KA.     BTW, this is one 
>>> for Ole to comment on.  Lol
>>>
>>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look at 
>>>> this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ In 
>>>> the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV 
>>>> capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful 
>>>> magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP 
>>>> (Magneto-electric pulse).  It reasoned that the new family of Neo 
>>>> magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the heavy 
>>>> capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast explosive , 
>>>> Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the nanosecond range 
>>>> needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted into particle flux 
>>>> which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>>
>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux 
>>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon.  Here is a first step into 
>>>>> learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just build 
>>>>> sensors. See attachment.   Now that you have a sensor lets look at 
>>>>> the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very powerful 
>>>>> neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember that energy cannot be 
>>>>> destroyed but can convert into another form of energy we call the 
>>>>> Magnetoelectric EMP.  See 
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator 
>>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field 
>>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage 
>>>>>> of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>
>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>
>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>
>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>
>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>
>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>
>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>
>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>
>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>
>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>
>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>
>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>
>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>
>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>
>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>
>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>
>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>
>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>
>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>
>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>
>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>
>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>
>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>
>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>
>>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>
>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>
>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>
>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>
>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>
>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>
>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>
>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>
>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>
>>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>
>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>
>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>
>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>
>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>

Since I brought up the MRA in this document, here is my reply to Hal 
Puthoff back in 1995 after his 50% unity on the Internet.

02/08/95
From: NORMAN WOOTAN  ~ To: ALL
Subject: MRA Test Results

I have been rather quiet on the subject of the MRA test that was 
conducted for I have let Joel handle the responses since he is more 
diplomatic the I. Well I have a few comments for all who are interested 
to really ponder. First, let us consider the true nature of the 
piezoelectric element in the MRA. This is probably the most "NON LINEAR" 
device that man or nature has ever constructed. Everyone knows just how 
NON-linear they are especially when I can hit the piezo with a simple 
pulse of 57 V and get a return of over 1000 V as a response from this 
little device. Now let us look at the peculiar little MRA coil. First we 
start with a totally "saturated" magnetic core with a primary coil and a 
secondary coil wound directly onto the magnet. We are "ringing" the 
crystalline lattice structure of the BaFeSi material that composes the 
magnet therefore this component is also "TOTALLY NONLINEAR". What do you 
get when you couple two "TOTALLY NON LINEAR" devices together into a 
series resonant circuit where we are driving one element 3 octaves above 
the other and producing 9 harmonics and purposely de-tuning the circuit 
to cause one of the harmonics to beat
against the incoming current from the signal source to cause the MRA to 
achieve over-unity???  Well if you haven't figured it out yet you have a 
circuit that does things that are "NOT IN ANY TEXT BOOK PRINTED". Joel 
and I have spent countless hours looking at results of simple 
experiments conducted with the MRA that simply defy all EM theory or 
logic. Now "please" consider what I have said about how "NONLINEAR" this 
whole device is and go down to the last line in the file MRACLAR.ASC and 
read the recommendation that we should read "Principles of Linear 
Networks" by Friedland, Wing & Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961. I highly respect 
Hal Puthoff and his theoretical abilities but in the case of the MRA, 
I'm sorry the "light has not come on". This circuit is over-unity and we 
are still proceeding with the driver circuit to make it obvious to all 
who wish to see and "believe". ~ Norm

On 1/6/2019 9:22 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Moray King, Back where my Patent on the Implosion Vortex Hydrogen 
> Reactor was being reviewed by International Patent Application, A  
> Japanese examiner challenged the vortex principles and called us out 
> saying it was centrifugal in operation.    I replied back to him 
> asking that he explore Victor Schauberger's works with the implosion 
> vortex, (Centripetal not centrifugal)  The problem that researchers 
> have is understanding that micro cavitation vortex has a core pressure 
> approaching infinity which causes the heating to such high values. 
> Pressure results in heat, Vacuum results in cooling.   See the 
> reasoning in these videos. 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOPCG8M30lI&feature=youtu.be 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEsJSpru0Bw&feature=youtu.be
>
> On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Bert,  During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I 
>> contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I 
>> called a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi.   Looks like I 
>> was on the right track back then. Joel said it had a light channel. 
>> The Magneto-electric effect was the correct research path.  Had we 
>> known about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then, 
>> the whole story would have been altered.  The "pressure-induced 
>> magnetic phase transition."should be very interesting approach for 
>> You and Phil since you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber) 
>> which provides the more than 23GPa over pressures to get the magnetic 
>> field conversion effect.  The Z pinch effect provides the same over 
>> pressures that you would get with high speed explosives but probably 
>> much faster, down in the nano sec. range. The PLUS + for you is you 
>> don't have to deal with TNT.  Lol Please read these references to see 
>> why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.
>>
>> BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak 
>> resonant range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect 
>> getting the flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect 
>> phenomenon. They did it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water 
>> just as Joel and I got in my Sonodiffuser. 
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices 
>> Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop 
>> action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV, 
>> Blue wave length.
>>
>> See attached   APL RingNiPZT.pdf
>>
>> https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
>>
>> https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
>>
>> https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
>>
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article 
>>> <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to in 
>>> the e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and 
>>> out-of-place.  Maybe. Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really 
>>> weird and out-of-place/.
>>>
>>> The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium 
>>> magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents.  But please 
>>> re-read this paragraph from the article:
>>>
>>> /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like 
>>> the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile 
>>> Research Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on 
>>> to *lead zirconate titanate magnets*. The current state of the art 
>>> is described as a//completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage 
>>> nanosecond pulse-generating system 
>>> <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//, 
>>> occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>>>
>>> Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also 
>>> known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>>>
>>> This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate 
>>> titanate _*magnets*_.  As far as I know, there is no such thing as a 
>>> lead zirconate titanate magnet!  I still have a pile of the original 
>>> MRA PZT's.  Now, perhaps the author of the article is probably just 
>>> accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat out made a 
>>> mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet.  But *someone* he 
>>> talked to mentioned using PZT in these explosive experiments - 
>>> because no one just accidentally spits out "lead zirconate titanate" 
>>> in casual conversation, especially when the topic is specifically 
>>> blowing up neodymium magnets - which normally has nothing whatsoever 
>>> to do with piezoelectric crystals!
>>>
>>> Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate 
>>> that over-unity pulse. . . . .   :>)
>>>
>>> Bert
>>>
>>>
>>> /
>>> /
>>>
>>> /
>>> /
>>>
>>> /
>>> /
>>>
>>> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This 
>>>> document is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.    
>>>> My prime interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which 
>>>> according to the Wired article produces a stream of particles that 
>>>> can be focused and channeled to a target. My question is, What are 
>>>> the particles that composed the magnetic flux before destruction 
>>>> and do they comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory.  Folks, this is 
>>>> whole new ball game if we can create vast energy from directly 
>>>> destroying magnet flux. Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla 
>>>> one inch cube magnets and have a direct generation of 
>>>> "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition." electric output in KV 
>>>> @ KA.   BTW, this is one for Ole to comment on.  Lol
>>>>
>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look 
>>>>> at this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/ 
>>>>> In the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV 
>>>>> capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful 
>>>>> magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the EMP 
>>>>> (Magneto-electric pulse).  It  reasoned that the new family of Neo 
>>>>> magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the heavy 
>>>>> capacitors and copper solenoid coil.  With a super fast explosive 
>>>>> , Octanitrocubane  could destroy the Neo's in the nanosecond range 
>>>>> needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted into particle 
>>>>> flux which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux 
>>>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon.  Here is a first step into 
>>>>>> learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect.  Just build 
>>>>>> sensors. See attachment.   Now that you have a sensor lets look 
>>>>>> at the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very 
>>>>>> powerful neo magnet via rapid explosives.  Remember that energy 
>>>>>> cannot be destroyed but can convert into another form of energy 
>>>>>> we call the Magnetoelectric EMP.  See 
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator 
>>>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field 
>>>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage 
>>>>>>> of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative.  See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential.  The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>