Body
I'll throw in a few wild cards now and then based on the experimentation
by Joel and I back in the day. Here is a real goodie for your
consideration. Remember Hans Coler? See
https://rimstar.org/sdenergy/coler/index.htm
*174.925 magnetic frequency*
http://www.rimstar.org/sdenergy/coler/index.htm#MAGNETSTROMAPPARAT
Our measurement of the magnetic frequency ocured while experimenting
with the MRA. Interesting that our frequency closely agreed with the
Tesla Colorado Springs Coil and the findings in the Hans Coler device.
See Coler narritive.
If now the other winding is connected in series with the pre-magnetized
steel rod -- as secondary coil -- in such a way that the secondary
current must pass through the magnet, one half cycle of the secondary
current must be more or less subdued; in other words, a rectifying
effect must be created (It may be remembered that according to
measurements by Professors Kloss and Schumann, a high frequency pulsed
direct current-- about 180 KHz -- is flowing in the output resistance of
the apparatus, for the creation of which no other explanation seems
possible). BTW. The Corum's calculated the operating frequency of the
Tesla Magnifyer Coil at just under 180 kHz. As you are are well aware,
they are the leader of the effort over in Milford, TX. See Zenneck
Surface Wave.
http://vizivtechnologies.com/technology/
https://www.waxahachietx.com/news/20180611/milford-testing-facility-tower-seeks-to-send-signals-worldwide
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FXZbf2EWxQ&feature=youtu.be
On 1/4/2019 7:54 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> I have been on the EVGRAY Yahoo Group since Doug set it up after the
> 2001 Keely Net Conference in Dallas. Here is an example of the Cannon
> Fodder you have to put up with when you do open source
> experimentation. See Hector's RV Replication.
>
> On 1/3/2005 9:23 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>> Dear Earl: I'll try to be respectful to you inspite of your absolutely
>> ridiculous questions.
>> First of all I will state again for the nth time that I am not
>> interested in pursuing the research of
>> others. Hector asked anyone out there on the net to do his RV
>> experiment to verify that the RV
>> displays O/U output. I did the experiment 2 years ago and posted the
>> results on the net on the
>> KeelyNet web site. The results were also discussed on the various Yahoo
>> Groups. I have no desire to
>> build RV units and am not selling power nor am I off the grid. The RV
>> is so easy to put together and
>> cost so little to gather the necessary parts that I am quite confident
>> that a man of your extensive
>> knowledge and expertise can do this simple test and gather your own data
>> just the way you like it.
>> I chose to use the RV as the prime mover to drive a simple "low lenz" PM
>> disk motor as a generator
>> so that the output side of the energy equation was pure "filtered" DC
>> which when dissipated into a pure
>> resistive load would enable any simple idiot the ability to measure
>> output. Is that simple enough
>> for you as an "arm chair" critic to assimilate. Get a grasp on
>> reality. I believe that Ken Carrigan
>> stated the case correctly with his statement to me regarding power
>> factor. If the power factor was anything
>> other than 1:1 "unity" then the O/U would in fact be greater than my
>> calculations. The power in my
>> lab is absolutely "unity" 1:1. Since I have thousands of pounds of all
>> size caps, if it were not unity, I could
>> make it so in a matter of minutes. I have far too much going on in my
>> life to spend any time on photographing
>> scope traces and experimental data to give out to people whom are too
>> lazy to get off their asses and do the
>> experiment themselves. Your questions to me have demonstrated to
>> everyone on this list the true nature of the person
>> known as Earl. I suggest you "back off" and go do your research and
>> read the posted report.
>> P.S.: I have stated many times during the RV discussions that you
>> cannot heavily load a RV because it will
>> not display O/U if you drop the RPM below the design slip speed.
>> Remember you are dealing with a rotary
>> phase resonance situation. Fine tuning with the correct cap values
>> brings the current down to an absolute minimum
>> for each running condition under which you want to gather data. Change
>> the loading requires an adjustment to the
>> circuit capacitance.
>> Norm
>>
>> Earl Lagergren wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Norman,
>>>
>>> Since there is a rumor floating around that you have peer-reviewed the
>>> RV and confirmed OU, I have some questions for you:
>>>
>>> 1) Did you test the RV **under heavy mechanical load** and find it to
>>> be OU ? How much OU? When was this test? If in 2002, what news do
>>> you have to add now in 2005? Please bring us up-to-date with latest
>>> news and insights.
>>>
>>> 2) What are you presently doing with the RV?
>>>
>>> 3) Are you able to sell enough energy from OU RVs to retire and pay the
>>> bills exclusively from RV-generated income?
>>>
>>> 4) Are you still connected to the grid?
>>>
>>> 5) Where can I find the complete RV test report, including exact test
>>> setups, schematics, photos, utilized measuring equipment, etc. ? A
>>> report from 2002 used Amps without mentioning DC, RMS, peak, peak to
>>> peak, etc.
>>>
>>> 6) If your testing involved calculations of AC waveform powers, can
>>> you provide scope photos, phase angles, etc. and how you calculated
>>> power?
>>>
>>> 7) Did you check waveform shapes with a scope?
>>>
>>> Best regards, Earl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> On 1/4/2019 7:21 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> An added note to Moray King regarding the vortex-anti vortex
>> reconnect phenomenon in water. When I was working in Joseph Bender's
>> lab, he had a book written on the Schauberger Implosion Vortex
>> Electrical corona effects at the output of the vortex.
>> (Electro-magnetic). Little known is the fact that in an implosion
>> vortex the pressures approach infinity in the needle fine vortex core
>> which causes the dissociation of the water molecules and the
>> recombining explosion (H-H-O) which yields the emission of photons in
>> the UV, blue range of light. Joel was fascinated by the fact that
>> the water flowing around in the Sonodiffuser tygon tubing was
>> magnetized. The plasma introduced the magnetism into the event since
>> there is such a powerful magnetic current in plasma.
>>
>> On 1/4/2019 6:10 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> Bert, During the time Joel & I were working with MRA, 1995, I
>>> contacted a magnet mfg in China to make prototype magnet that I
>>> called a "Light magnet" for it had Fe, Ba, Ti and Zi. Looks like I
>>> was on the right track back then. Joel said it had a light channel.
>>> The Magneto-electric effect was the correct research path. Had we
>>> known about the Magneto-electric ( flux reconnect) effect back then,
>>> the whole story would have been altered. The "pressure-induced
>>> magnetic phase transition."should be very interesting approach for
>>> You and Phil since you have the Z pinch (quarter shrinking chamber)
>>> which provides the more than 23GPa over pressures to get the
>>> magnetic field conversion effect. The Z pinch effect provides the
>>> same over pressures that you would get with high speed explosives
>>> but probably much faster, down in the nano sec. range. The PLUS +
>>> for you is you don't have to deal with TNT. Lol Please read these
>>> references to see why the Army Boys were blowing up PZT.
>>>
>>> BTW, when we were driving the MRA at super high Q in the peak
>>> resonant range (lossless region of the curve) we were in effect
>>> getting the flux conversion pressures for possible reconnect
>>> phenomenon. They did it in the lab with vortex/anti vortex in water
>>> just as Joel and I got in my Sonodiffuser.
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278715793_Reconnection_of_skewed_vortices
>>> Ok! Moray King,this was what we saw in the Sonodiffuser when stop
>>> action strobe and getting the implosion light emission in the UV,
>>> Blue wave length.
>>>
>>> See attached APL RingNiPZT.pdf
>>>
>>> https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.2986470?journalCode=jap
>>>
>>> https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=3759
>>>
>>> https://www.americanelements.com/research/electrical-and-magnetic-properties-of-barium-hexaferrite-modified-barium-zirconium-titanate-lead
>>>
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276162517_NiCo-lead_zirconium_titanate-NiCo_trilayered_magnetoelectric_composites_prepared_by_electroless_deposition
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/3/2019 8:27 PM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Norm, I was reading that Wired.com article
>>>> <https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/> you linked to in
>>>> the e-mail below, and I spotted something very weird and
>>>> out-of-place. Maybe. Well, not just /maybe/, but /yeah, really
>>>> weird and out-of-place/.
>>>>
>>>> The article talks about how researchers are blowing up neodymium
>>>> magnets to release phenomenal electrical currents. But please
>>>> re-read this paragraph from the article:
>>>>
>>>> /Having proved the principle by blowing up neodymium magnets (like
>>>> the ones in your headphones) the Army's Aviation and Missile
>>>> Research Development and Engineering Center (Amrdec) have moved on
>>>> to *lead zirconate titanate magnets*. The current state of the art
>>>> is described as a//completely explosive ultracompact high-voltage
>>>> nanosecond pulse-generating system
>>>> <http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/post_prints/CompletelyExplosiveUltracompactHigh-VoltageNan_09007dcc805885f1.html>//,
>>>> occupying about one-fifth of a cubic inch./
>>>>
>>>> Now, I know that your MRA device used lead zirconate titanate (also
>>>> known as PZT) ultrasonic TRANSDUCERS.
>>>>
>>>> This article says the researchers are blowing up lead zirconate
>>>> titanate _*magnets*_. As far as I know, there is no such thing as
>>>> a lead zirconate titanate magnet! I still have a pile of the
>>>> original MRA PZT's. Now, perhaps the author of the article is
>>>> probably just accidentally mixing apples and oranges and just flat
>>>> out made a mistake in calling the PZT material a magnet. But
>>>> *someone* he talked to mentioned using PZT in these explosive
>>>> experiments - because no one just accidentally spits out "lead
>>>> zirconate titanate" in casual conversation, especially when the
>>>> topic is specifically blowing up neodymium magnets - which normally
>>>> has nothing whatsoever to do with piezoelectric crystals!
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the MRA just needed a bit more cee four "oomph" to generate
>>>> that over-unity pulse. . . . . :>)
>>>>
>>>> Bert
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> On 12/31/2018 5:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon This
>>>>> document is a pretty good review of the DEW technology so far.
>>>>> My prime interest is in the annihilation of magnetic flux which
>>>>> according to the Wired article produces a stream of particles that
>>>>> can be focused and channeled to a target. My question is, What are
>>>>> the particles that composed the magnetic flux before destruction
>>>>> and do they comply with the SUPER LIGHT theory. Folks, this is
>>>>> whole new ball game if we can create vast energy from directly
>>>>> destroying magnet flux. Kone, just blow up a few of your 1.5 Tesla
>>>>> one inch cube magnets and have a direct generation of
>>>>> "pressure-induced magnetic phase transition." electric output in
>>>>> KV @ KA. BTW, this is one for Ole to comment on. Lol
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/30/2018 1:51 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To add to the info on the Neo magnetic NNEMP weapon, take a look
>>>>>> at this Army doc. https://www.wired.com/2009/03/army-turns-bomb/
>>>>>> In the old Flux compression Generators there was a need for HV
>>>>>> capacitor bank and a long solenoid coil to provide the powerful
>>>>>> magnetic flux field needed to be annihilated which yielded the
>>>>>> EMP (Magneto-electric pulse). It reasoned that the new family
>>>>>> of Neo magnets held the necessary flux strength which negated the
>>>>>> heavy capacitors and copper solenoid coil. With a super fast
>>>>>> explosive , Octanitrocubane could destroy the Neo's in the
>>>>>> nanosecond range needed for the EMP shot (magnetic flux converted
>>>>>> into particle flux which is the constituents of the magnetic field)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octanitrocubane
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remember that my main line of research is the Magnetic flux
>>>>>>> annihilation-Reconnect EMP phenomenon. Here is a first step
>>>>>>> into learning more about the Magnetoelectric effect. Just build
>>>>>>> sensors. See attachment. Now that you have a sensor lets look
>>>>>>> at the Magnetoelectric (EMP output when you destroy a very
>>>>>>> powerful neo magnet via rapid explosives. Remember that energy
>>>>>>> cannot be destroyed but can convert into another form of energy
>>>>>>> we call the Magnetoelectric EMP. See
>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive-driven_ferromagnetic_generator
>>>>>>> This is a direct conversion of powerful magnetic flux field
>>>>>>> directly into very high power electrical output.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 11:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tesla's Pyro generator to which I referred which took advantage
>>>>>>>> of iron phase shift.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-428057-pyromagneto-electric-generator
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Somewhere here we have to jump back and address IONS both positive and negative. See my 1996 paper for KeelyNet titled WHAT is Heat which dealt with ionization and its potential. The loss or gain of electrons in the atomic lattice causes the precise predictability of the various phase change points.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the Bad Boy that I wanted to build using nitrogen gas and an alpha emitter electrodes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is Heat #2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electrical power around the phenomenon.The reason for this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials.My
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electronic cooling devices.Would you believe that most
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> junction.Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electrical energy resulted.Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold.It was not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> reversed.These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> differentials.In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles.In
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship.The first
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas.With a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed.Increasing
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and voltage.About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the KeelyNet BBS.My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thermal energy across the junction.This is a directly
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> change material such as water and refrigerants.We have
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change.Would
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> provides an attendant electrical effect.Back in 1840
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> passing through the nozzles.After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> not purely mechanical.The atoms of the material lose or
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> transitions between phases.More energy is present after
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> explained.When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> totally not understood by modern science.Now my suspicions
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> question of, What is heat?We were told in the school
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of energy.What is the form of this energy?Let us look at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> process.When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot.The
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes.Now
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> net negative state or cold.Heat or cold is based on the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ion relationship in the material.When we apply a flame
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (ions).Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> how the process works.All phase change processes work the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> processes which we were taught.Everything in chemistry is
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At a Vangard Science Round table discussion several years ago
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cooling effects.Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged.This is a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> very efficient method of air-conditioning because an ion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> current involved.It is possible to develop this ion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials.Remember
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> as in the Peltier device.I hope that this dialog will
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> of experimentation.Norm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/30/2018 10:49 AM, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:42 AM Norman Wootan<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As molten iron cools past its freezing point of 1538 °C, it crystallizes
>>>>>>>>> Where would something like the Barkenhausen effect, fit into this
>>>>>>>>> whole Iron thing?; See Volume-II of the Feynman Lecture on Physics.
>>>>>>>>> Feynman demonstrates energy generation, at a small scale.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is also "CATER, Joseph: The Awesome Life Force ~ A 1980s classic
>>>>>>>>> review of alternative sciences (PDF)",
>>>>>>>>> based on a mixture of conventional and original ideas by Cater.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://rexresearch.com/pdf/CaterAwesomeLifeForce.pdf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pg 126 "Nature of Magnetic Fields", pg 167 "Soft Electrons, Magnetic
>>>>>>>>> fields", pg 204 "Transmission through materials"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> which lead us to pg 256 "THE SELF-SUSTAINING ELECTRIC GENERATOR",
>>>>>>>>> based on Hubbard's Generator made of Iron shown later in the book.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We also have those that prefer to use metals that were forged
>>>>>>>>> pre-atomic-blasts in some esoteric devices. ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ��My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
>>>>>>>>>> ― Nikola Tesla
>>>>>>>>> Considered the Raikov Effect or Deep Trance Identification?
>>>>>>>>>
>>