ROTOVERTER

Hiv everyone,You are all likely to remember the RV  experiment involving
putting the load in series with the capacitor, and ignoring the shaft turning?This begs a question regarding the other phasesHow are they employed?One runs the motor.I think the other one is using the capacitance to tune to resonance?The capacitance is adjusted to the load, for minimum draw to the motor.Now let's introduce a moving permanent magnet to energize all three phases, such as in the Samsung washing machine motor, being driven as a generator.Each of these three phases is putting out an AC signal in relation to the other two wires.Could it then be possible to tune, much in the same way, as the Rotoverter, not for the lowest amperage draw, but for the lowest shaft torque required to drive the load?The drive could be a Rotoverter motor, belt driving the said permanent magnet alternator/ generator.It would require four capacitor tuning boxes, the loads in series with the tuned capacitors combined, using three bridge rectifiers, to a common, in parallel, DC output.My first experiment is to determine that the shaft torque is, indeed, reduced by capacitor tuning.Should that be verified, and consistent with our 1.614 to 1.618 advantages found with the Rotoverter, it would be sweet, because we might find ourselves on the road to lowering the forces of lenz drag.You can guess how that might help.Turning the Golden bicycle motor, using a DC motor and measuring the amperage draw lighting a 100 watt light bulb, with, and without, capacitors, should give us a clue?Cheers Warren
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

Funny that ? I was just thinking about Newman motors and if they could be
tuned to move the node point to an energy extraction point .if that might
boost out put .in transmitters you use a swr meter to cut the antenna to
put the node at the very top .it seems relevant to power out put .so why
wouldn't that apply to motors ect?.

On Monday, October 21, 2019, Warren Keillor [email protected]
[EVGRAY] <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hiv everyone,
> You are all likely to remember the RV  experiment involving
> putting the load in series with the capacitor, and ignoring the shaft
> turning?
> This begs a question regarding the other phases
> How are they employed?
> One runs the motor.
> I think the other one is using the capacitance to tune to resonance?
> The capacitance is adjusted to the load, for minimum draw to the motor.
> Now let's introduce a moving permanent magnet to energize all three
> phases, such as in the Samsung washing machine motor, being driven as a
> generator.
> Each of these three phases is putting out an AC signal in relation to the
> other two wires.
> Could it then be possible to tune, much in the same way, as the
> Rotoverter, not for the lowest amperage draw, but for the lowest shaft
> torque required to drive the load?
> The drive could be a Rotoverter motor, belt driving the said permanent
> magnet alternator/ generator.
> It would require four capacitor tuning boxes, the loads in series with the
> tuned capacitors combined, using three bridge rectifiers, to a common, in
> parallel, DC output.
> My first experiment is to determine that the shaft torque is, indeed,
> reduced by capacitor tuning.
> Should that be verified, and consistent with our 1.614 to 1.618 advantages
> found with the Rotoverter, it would be sweet, because we might find
> ourselves on the road to lowering the forces of lenz drag.
> You can guess how that might help.
> Turning the Golden bicycle motor, using a DC motor and measuring the
> amperage draw lighting a 100 watt light bulb, with, and without,
> capacitors, should give us a clue?
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> 
>