Re: Fwd: Futurism: Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity
4
messages
·
2019-03-12T13:03:24-05:00
→
2019-03-13T07:38:58-05:00
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →
[1/4] Re: Fwd: Futurism: Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity
2019-03-12T13:03:24-05:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
https://qz.com/1566061/quantum-computing-will-change-the-way-the-world-uses-energy/ On 3/12/2019 12:59 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon > > http://news.mit.edu/2010/explained-phonons-0706 > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sound-by-the-pound-surprising-discovery-hints-sonic-waves-carry-mass/ > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc-NcAvqguM&feature=youtu.be This is > good one.. > > On 3/12/2019 4:05 AM, Bert Pool wrote: >> By the way, this report comes from the highly respected journal >> /Physical Review Letters, /and not the /Daily Sun /or the/National >> Inquirer./ >> / >> / >> /See link at bottom to read article./ >> >> It's going to be hard to explain this new discovery, especially since >> the recent discovery (about five years ago) of the Higgs particle >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson> at CERN, a discovery >> which pretty well cements into place the Standard Model, where the >> Higgs particle is responsible for everything having mass (and thus is >> a key part of any defining theory of gravity)! >> >> If something as simple as a sound wave can carry /negative/ gravity, >> then what about all other waves?? >> >> Jerry Decker would be going nuts over this, as he was a big proponent >> of all the old legends about past civilizations levitating all those >> 100 ton blocks of stone with sound. So, maybe there actually was a >> basis in physics for those legends, after all! One has to wonder if >> this negative gravity effect also imparts negative MASS to >> something? I mean, sure, it's nice and all to reduce the weight of a >> vehicle to zero (I'm stretching the limits of what this discovery >> might eventually lead to), or even produce negative weight, but >> wouldn't it be peachy keen if your craft /also/ had zero mass? Gosh, >> I'd bet you could fly around the sky and make 90 degree turns at >> 3,000 miles per hour! It's a shame no one has ever reported seeing >> such a thing. >> >> Continuing . . . . >> According to the article, the anti-gravity effect is very tiny and >> extremely difficult to measure. >> >> Questions immediately come to mind: What frequencies of waves would >> work best - does a higher frequency work better than a low >> frequency? Do louder sounds create more anti-mass than quiet >> sounds? What effect does the shape of the waveform have on the >> anti-gravity effect? *If the effect is simply due to the existence of >> a wave, (any wave?), might this new effect explain the operation of >> that microwave **E.M. drive >> <https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/05/nasa-emdrive-impossible-physics-independent-tests-magnetic-space-science/>**that >> NASA built, but then NASA could not explain HOW it worked? >> Microwaves are a damn sight higher in frequency than sound! >> * >> >> Hmmmmm. Maybe those Vedic dudes really did float stuff around using >> sound! It will be interesting to see if any other scientific group >> is able to replicate these initial test results. >> >> Bert >> >> The link: >> >> *Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity* >> >> Futurism >> >> Important Update Conventional wisdom in physics dictates that sound >> waves are massless fluctuations in pressure that travel through >> materials like air, water, and eardrums — and can't travel through >> empty space. That's why the recent discovery that sound waves >> actually do carry a trace amount of mass is so shocking — it's been >> right under scientists'... Read the full story >> <https://futurism.com/sound-waves-particles-negative-gravity/> >> >>
[2/4] Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Fwd: Futurism: Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity
2019-03-12T23:45:36+00:00
·
james glinski
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<CA+uJ=nc80Rwd_9JBHwOTP8GUtYcc+V6rTWnsHwoMiKhJMJ6KnA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello this is off topic but important to some .I've recently got a audio book off google play or google book .?.well its called ... curing the incurable ...written by a MD .on mega doces of vitamin C ..he said I think its 2400 case study's from medical journals ..it sure felt like it ..took me several runs to get though it . its all about the research done on vitamin C oral ..intermuscular... And intervenial .it all viruses .period . complety safe ..cures the common cold the flue ..polio ..hep C .ect and a hell of a lot more ..all these news story's about children dieing each year are completely unnessary . its a treasure for 14.00 ...I've checked you can get ready to go intermuscular vitamin C on google .its seems that your very limited with oral because your gut only allows a certain level in your blood and shears the rest .but intermuscular not so or intravenous not so you can use less and get more of an effect .with the information you might not ever see a doctor again !! On Tuesday, March 12, 2019, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] < [email protected]> wrote: > > > https://qz.com/1566061/quantum-computing-will-change- > the-way-the-world-uses-energy/ > On 3/12/2019 12:59 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon > > http://news.mit.edu/2010/explained-phonons-0706 > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sound-by-the-pound- > surprising-discovery-hints-sonic-waves-carry-mass/ > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc-NcAvqguM&feature=youtu.be This is > good one.. > On 3/12/2019 4:05 AM, Bert Pool wrote: > > By the way, this report comes from the highly respected journal *Physical > Review Letters, *and not the *Daily Sun *or the* National Inquirer.* > > *See link at bottom to read article.* > > It's going to be hard to explain this new discovery, especially since the > recent discovery (about five years ago) of the Higgs particle > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson> at CERN, a discovery which > pretty well cements into place the Standard Model, where the Higgs particle > is responsible for everything having mass (and thus is a key part of any > defining theory of gravity)! > > If something as simple as a sound wave can carry *negative* gravity, then > what about all other waves?? > > Jerry Decker would be going nuts over this, as he was a big proponent of > all the old legends about past civilizations levitating all those 100 ton > blocks of stone with sound. So, maybe there actually was a basis in > physics for those legends, after all! One has to wonder if this negative > gravity effect also imparts negative MASS to something? I mean, sure, it's > nice and all to reduce the weight of a vehicle to zero (I'm stretching the > limits of what this discovery might eventually lead to), or even produce > negative weight, but wouldn't it be peachy keen if your craft *also* had > zero mass? Gosh, I'd bet you could fly around the sky and make 90 degree > turns at 3,000 miles per hour! It's a shame no one has ever reported > seeing such a thing. > > Continuing . . . . > According to the article, the anti-gravity effect is very tiny and > extremely difficult to measure. > > Questions immediately come to mind: What frequencies of waves would work > best - does a higher frequency work better than a low frequency? Do louder > sounds create more anti-mass than quiet sounds? What effect does the shape > of the waveform have on the anti-gravity effect? *If the effect is > simply due to the existence of a wave, (any wave?), might this new effect > explain the operation of that microwave **E.M. drive > <https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/05/nasa-emdrive-impossible-physics-independent-tests-magnetic-space-science/>* > * that NASA built, but then NASA could not explain HOW it worked? > Microwaves are a damn sight higher in frequency than sound! * > > Hmmmmm. Maybe those Vedic dudes really did float stuff around using > sound! It will be interesting to see if any other scientific group is able > to replicate these initial test results. > > Bert > > The link: > > *Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity* > > Futurism > > Important Update Conventional wisdom in physics dictates that sound waves > are massless fluctuations in pressure that travel through materials like > air, water, and eardrums — and can't travel through empty space. That's why > the recent discovery that sound waves actually do carry a trace amount of > mass is so shocking — it's been right under scientists'... Read the full > story <https://futurism.com/sound-waves-particles-negative-gravity/> > > >
[3/4] Re: Fwd: Futurism: Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity
2019-03-13T07:23:33-05:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/03/190312123354.htm Thanks to Bert Pool for this article which explains a lot of past observations in experimentation. Example, MRA, VTA. When Floyd Sweet and Bearden told me that we would not be able to loop the MRA due to the fact that we were dealing with the COLD Electricity phenomenon, little did I know. A whole new insight into the twisted magnetic field lines that we observed. See ** *Tuning procedures used on the MRA* ** ** *A MRA was constructed using two ea. Of the Radio Shack barium ferrite magnets #64-1877 that Greg Hodowanec referenced on page 4 of 18 in article written fro New Energy News as found on the Rex Research site.I wound 100 turns of #26 stranded wire on the primary then wound (overlaid) 162 turns of #30 stranded for a secondary which gave me a PHI (1:1.618) Ratio.For those that do not know about the “Golden Mean” or Phi ratios you need to do some serious research before proceeding any further.Everything related to this project refers directly back to this ratio.This ratio is paramount to the study of the resonant phenomenon as employed in this device.The piezo used in the attached circuit was the standard Branson Welder element, which we were told, was lead zirconate piezo crystal with a primary resonant freq of 32KHZ.MRA was driven with a HP200 vacuum tube signal generator with a 48V lamp on the DC output from the full wave bridge.* *Tuning requires finding the various resonant points and zeroing in on the most powerful, finding that very sharp resonant peak.* *Attached are three oscilloscope photographs, circuit diagram (series resonant MRA circuit) and a resonant curve for a series resonant circuit, which depicts the region of operation that we seek to find.* *This document will describe the tuning procedures used to bring the resonating circuit into that loss less ultra high “Q” region slightly on the right side of the resonant peak.Keep in mind that we are tuning a series resonant circuit, which produces a slight reactive**component (current lagging) when tuned to the immediate right side of the resonant curve.This tuned position provides us almost infinite impedance in the input side of our circuit.* *To reach this finely tuned, ideal resonant condition it is first necessary to find that resonant condition shown in oscilloscope photo*#1.*This photo depicts a net capacitive condition with the current clearly leading the voltage traces.The next step is to tune through the resonant peak to find a condition of net reactive which shows a current lagging scope trace as shown in photo #3.Now we tune ever so slightly down in frequency* *to approach that infinite “Q” sweet spot which lies just to the right of the resonant peak providing an almost infinite impedance in our primary which also brings the current and voltage into a very favorable* *power factor which yields the maximum gain possible as depicted in photo #2.* When working with the MRA you have to understand the conditioning that has to be observed.Tune your MRA to a resonant condition and leave it running for several hours in a room temperature of about 75 degrees.A cold magnet will not work in the MRA.There is a strange columnar field that slowly builds around the device.You have to experiment with the length of the clip leads that you use to connect the signal generator to the MRA.I have one small MRA that will light a 15 watt florescent tube via signal generator input using 12 inch #18ga. leads but will not work with 18 inch leads.Remember that you are working with a resonant device so all factors relate and must be observed.This is the reason so many researchers have totally failed to make the MRA function.It is due to lack of understanding of the basic principals involved.If you examine the scope photos you clearly see the huge number of harmonics involved in a properly tuned and functioning MRA.These higher order harmonics are the key to achieving O/U.Without a sharp resonant curve to begin with you will not get the results desired.The taller sine waves are the potential (voltage) and the packed (bright) wave forms are the current wave form from the current probe.Potential (voltage) in these photos are approximately 50VAC peak to peak with a signal generator input of less than 5 VAC.Digest this and we will discuss more later.I have many wild stories to tell regarding some of the really weird things that happen around the MRA when it has been running for a long time at resonance. *More later.* *Norm* *Thanks, Bert for you were right on with your comment about needing some C-4. Lol * On 3/12/2019 1:03 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > https://qz.com/1566061/quantum-computing-will-change-the-way-the-world-uses-energy/ > > On 3/12/2019 12:59 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: >> >> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon >> >> http://news.mit.edu/2010/explained-phonons-0706 >> >> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sound-by-the-pound-surprising-discovery-hints-sonic-waves-carry-mass/ >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc-NcAvqguM&feature=youtu.be This is >> good one.. >> >> On 3/12/2019 4:05 AM, Bert Pool wrote: >>> By the way, this report comes from the highly respected journal >>> /Physical Review Letters, /and not the /Daily Sun /or the/National >>> Inquirer./ >>> / >>> / >>> /See link at bottom to read article./ >>> >>> It's going to be hard to explain this new discovery, especially >>> since the recent discovery (about five years ago) of the Higgs >>> particle <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson> at CERN, a >>> discovery which pretty well cements into place the Standard Model, >>> where the Higgs particle is responsible for everything having mass >>> (and thus is a key part of any defining theory of gravity)! >>> >>> If something as simple as a sound wave can carry /negative/ gravity, >>> then what about all other waves?? >>> >>> Jerry Decker would be going nuts over this, as he was a big >>> proponent of all the old legends about past civilizations levitating >>> all those 100 ton blocks of stone with sound. So, maybe there >>> actually was a basis in physics for those legends, after all! One >>> has to wonder if this negative gravity effect also imparts negative >>> MASS to something? I mean, sure, it's nice and all to reduce the >>> weight of a vehicle to zero (I'm stretching the limits of what this >>> discovery might eventually lead to), or even produce negative >>> weight, but wouldn't it be peachy keen if your craft /also/ had zero >>> mass? Gosh, I'd bet you could fly around the sky and make 90 degree >>> turns at 3,000 miles per hour! It's a shame no one has ever >>> reported seeing such a thing. >>> >>> Continuing . . . . >>> According to the article, the anti-gravity effect is very tiny and >>> extremely difficult to measure. >>> >>> Questions immediately come to mind: What frequencies of waves would >>> work best - does a higher frequency work better than a low >>> frequency? Do louder sounds create more anti-mass than quiet >>> sounds? What effect does the shape of the waveform have on the >>> anti-gravity effect? *If the effect is simply due to the existence >>> of a wave, (any wave?), might this new effect explain the operation >>> of that microwave **E.M. drive >>> <https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/05/nasa-emdrive-impossible-physics-independent-tests-magnetic-space-science/>**that >>> NASA built, but then NASA could not explain HOW it worked? >>> Microwaves are a damn sight higher in frequency than sound! >>> * >>> >>> Hmmmmm. Maybe those Vedic dudes really did float stuff around using >>> sound! It will be interesting to see if any other scientific group >>> is able to replicate these initial test results. >>> >>> Bert >>> >>> The link: >>> >>> *Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity* >>> >>> Futurism >>> >>> Important Update Conventional wisdom in physics dictates that sound >>> waves are massless fluctuations in pressure that travel through >>> materials like air, water, and eardrums — and can't travel through >>> empty space. That's why the recent discovery that sound waves >>> actually do carry a trace amount of mass is so shocking — it's been >>> right under scientists'... Read the full story >>> <https://futurism.com/sound-waves-particles-negative-gravity/> >>> >>>
[4/4] Harnessing the energy in those twist and turns in magnetic flux
2019-03-13T07:38:58-05:00
·
Norman Wootan
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
http://www.teslatech.info/ttevents/2019conf/2019ETCall.pdf?inf_contact_key=b88d1c214cff5cca8c26a4928c25b26e680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1 On 3/13/2019 7:23 AM, Norman Wootan wrote: > > https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/03/190312123354.htm Thanks > to Bert Pool for this article which explains a lot of past > observations in experimentation. Example, MRA, VTA. When Floyd Sweet > and Bearden told me that we would not be able to loop the MRA due to > the fact that we were dealing with the COLD Electricity phenomenon, > little did I know. A whole new insight into the twisted magnetic > field lines that we observed. See > > ** > > *Tuning procedures used on the MRA* > > ** > > ** > > *A MRA was constructed using two ea. Of the Radio Shack barium ferrite > magnets #64-1877 that Greg Hodowanec referenced on page 4 of 18 in > article written fro New Energy News as found on the Rex Research > site.I wound 100 turns of #26 stranded wire on the primary then wound > (overlaid) 162 turns of #30 stranded for a secondary which gave me a > PHI (1:1.618) Ratio.For those that do not know about the “Golden Mean” > or Phi ratios you need to do some serious research before proceeding > any further.Everything related to this project refers directly back to > this ratio.This ratio is paramount to the study of the resonant > phenomenon as employed in this device.The piezo used in the attached > circuit was the standard Branson Welder element, which we were told, > was lead zirconate piezo crystal with a primary resonant freq of > 32KHZ.MRA was driven with a HP200 vacuum tube signal generator with a > 48V lamp on the DC output from the full wave bridge.* > > *Tuning requires finding the various resonant points and zeroing in on > the most powerful, finding that very sharp resonant peak.* > > *Attached are three oscilloscope photographs, circuit diagram (series > resonant MRA circuit) and a resonant curve for a series resonant > circuit, which depicts the region of operation that we seek to find.* > > *This document will describe the tuning procedures used to bring the > resonating circuit into that loss less ultra high “Q” region slightly > on the right side of the resonant peak.Keep in mind that we are tuning > a series resonant circuit, which produces a slight reactive**component > (current lagging) when tuned to the immediate right side of the > resonant curve.This tuned position provides us almost infinite > impedance in the input side of our circuit.* > > *To reach this finely tuned, ideal resonant condition it is first > necessary to find that resonant condition shown in oscilloscope > photo*#1.*This photo depicts a net capacitive condition with the > current clearly leading the voltage traces.The next step is to tune > through the resonant peak to find a condition of net reactive which > shows a current lagging scope trace as shown in photo #3.Now we tune > ever so slightly down in frequency* *to approach that infinite “Q” > sweet spot which lies just to the right of the resonant peak providing > an almost infinite impedance in our primary which also brings the > current and voltage into a very favorable* *power factor which yields > the maximum gain possible as depicted in photo #2.* > > When working with the MRA you have to understand the conditioning that > has to be observed.Tune your MRA to a resonant condition and leave it > running for several hours in a room temperature of about 75 degrees.A > cold magnet will not work in the MRA.There is a strange columnar field > that slowly builds around the device.You have to experiment with the > length of the clip leads that you use to connect the signal generator > to the MRA.I have one small MRA that will light a 15 watt florescent > tube via signal generator input using 12 inch #18ga. leads but will > not work with 18 inch leads.Remember that you are working with a > resonant device so all factors relate and must be observed.This is the > reason so many researchers have totally failed to make the MRA > function.It is due to lack of understanding of the basic principals > involved.If you examine the scope photos you clearly see the huge > number of harmonics involved in a properly tuned and functioning > MRA.These higher order harmonics are the key to achieving O/U.Without > a sharp resonant curve to begin with you will not get the results > desired.The taller sine waves are the potential (voltage) and the > packed (bright) wave forms are the current wave form from the current > probe.Potential (voltage) in these photos are approximately 50VAC peak > to peak with a signal generator input of less than 5 VAC.Digest this > and we will discuss more later.I have many wild stories to tell > regarding some of the really weird things that happen around the MRA > when it has been running for a long time at resonance. > > *More later.* > > *Norm* > > *Thanks, Bert for you were right on with your comment about needing > some C-4. Lol > * > > On 3/12/2019 1:03 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: >> >> https://qz.com/1566061/quantum-computing-will-change-the-way-the-world-uses-energy/ >> >> On 3/12/2019 12:59 PM, Norman Wootan wrote: >>> >>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon >>> >>> http://news.mit.edu/2010/explained-phonons-0706 >>> >>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sound-by-the-pound-surprising-discovery-hints-sonic-waves-carry-mass/ >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc-NcAvqguM&feature=youtu.be This is >>> good one.. >>> >>> On 3/12/2019 4:05 AM, Bert Pool wrote: >>>> By the way, this report comes from the highly respected journal >>>> /Physical Review Letters, /and not the /Daily Sun /or the/National >>>> Inquirer./ >>>> / >>>> / >>>> /See link at bottom to read article./ >>>> >>>> It's going to be hard to explain this new discovery, especially >>>> since the recent discovery (about five years ago) of the Higgs >>>> particle <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson> at CERN, a >>>> discovery which pretty well cements into place the Standard Model, >>>> where the Higgs particle is responsible for everything having mass >>>> (and thus is a key part of any defining theory of gravity)! >>>> >>>> If something as simple as a sound wave can carry /negative/ >>>> gravity, then what about all other waves?? >>>> >>>> Jerry Decker would be going nuts over this, as he was a big >>>> proponent of all the old legends about past civilizations >>>> levitating all those 100 ton blocks of stone with sound. So, maybe >>>> there actually was a basis in physics for those legends, after >>>> all! One has to wonder if this negative gravity effect also >>>> imparts negative MASS to something? I mean, sure, it's nice and >>>> all to reduce the weight of a vehicle to zero (I'm stretching the >>>> limits of what this discovery might eventually lead to), or even >>>> produce negative weight, but wouldn't it be peachy keen if your >>>> craft /also/ had zero mass? Gosh, I'd bet you could fly around the >>>> sky and make 90 degree turns at 3,000 miles per hour! It's a shame >>>> no one has ever reported seeing such a thing. >>>> >>>> Continuing . . . . >>>> According to the article, the anti-gravity effect is very tiny and >>>> extremely difficult to measure. >>>> >>>> Questions immediately come to mind: What frequencies of waves would >>>> work best - does a higher frequency work better than a low >>>> frequency? Do louder sounds create more anti-mass than quiet >>>> sounds? What effect does the shape of the waveform have on the >>>> anti-gravity effect? *If the effect is simply due to the existence >>>> of a wave, (any wave?), might this new effect explain the operation >>>> of that microwave **E.M. drive >>>> <https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/05/nasa-emdrive-impossible-physics-independent-tests-magnetic-space-science/>**that >>>> NASA built, but then NASA could not explain HOW it worked? >>>> Microwaves are a damn sight higher in frequency than sound! >>>> * >>>> >>>> Hmmmmm. Maybe those Vedic dudes really did float stuff around >>>> using sound! It will be interesting to see if any other scientific >>>> group is able to replicate these initial test results. >>>> >>>> Bert >>>> >>>> The link: >>>> >>>> *Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity* >>>> >>>> Futurism >>>> >>>> Important Update Conventional wisdom in physics dictates that sound >>>> waves are massless fluctuations in pressure that travel through >>>> materials like air, water, and eardrums — and can't travel through >>>> empty space. That's why the recent discovery that sound waves >>>> actually do carry a trace amount of mass is so shocking — it's been >>>> right under scientists'... Read the full story >>>> <https://futurism.com/sound-waves-particles-negative-gravity/> >>>> >>>>
← Previous
Page 1 of 1
Next →