Body
https://qz.com/1566061/quantum-computing-will-change-the-way-the-world-uses-energy/
On 3/12/2019 12:59 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon
>
> http://news.mit.edu/2010/explained-phonons-0706
>
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sound-by-the-pound-surprising-discovery-hints-sonic-waves-carry-mass/
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fc-NcAvqguM&feature=youtu.be This is
> good one..
>
> On 3/12/2019 4:05 AM, Bert Pool wrote:
>> By the way, this report comes from the highly respected journal
>> /Physical Review Letters, /and not the /Daily Sun /or the/National
>> Inquirer./
>> /
>> /
>> /See link at bottom to read article./
>>
>> It's going to be hard to explain this new discovery, especially since
>> the recent discovery (about five years ago) of the Higgs particle
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson> at CERN, a discovery
>> which pretty well cements into place the Standard Model, where the
>> Higgs particle is responsible for everything having mass (and thus is
>> a key part of any defining theory of gravity)!
>>
>> If something as simple as a sound wave can carry /negative/ gravity,
>> then what about all other waves??
>>
>> Jerry Decker would be going nuts over this, as he was a big proponent
>> of all the old legends about past civilizations levitating all those
>> 100 ton blocks of stone with sound. So, maybe there actually was a
>> basis in physics for those legends, after all! One has to wonder if
>> this negative gravity effect also imparts negative MASS to
>> something? I mean, sure, it's nice and all to reduce the weight of a
>> vehicle to zero (I'm stretching the limits of what this discovery
>> might eventually lead to), or even produce negative weight, but
>> wouldn't it be peachy keen if your craft /also/ had zero mass? Gosh,
>> I'd bet you could fly around the sky and make 90 degree turns at
>> 3,000 miles per hour! It's a shame no one has ever reported seeing
>> such a thing.
>>
>> Continuing . . . .
>> According to the article, the anti-gravity effect is very tiny and
>> extremely difficult to measure.
>>
>> Questions immediately come to mind: What frequencies of waves would
>> work best - does a higher frequency work better than a low
>> frequency? Do louder sounds create more anti-mass than quiet
>> sounds? What effect does the shape of the waveform have on the
>> anti-gravity effect? *If the effect is simply due to the existence of
>> a wave, (any wave?), might this new effect explain the operation of
>> that microwave **E.M. drive
>> <https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/05/nasa-emdrive-impossible-physics-independent-tests-magnetic-space-science/>**that
>> NASA built, but then NASA could not explain HOW it worked?
>> Microwaves are a damn sight higher in frequency than sound!
>> *
>>
>> Hmmmmm. Maybe those Vedic dudes really did float stuff around using
>> sound! It will be interesting to see if any other scientific group
>> is able to replicate these initial test results.
>>
>> Bert
>>
>> The link:
>>
>> *Sound May Be Carried by Tiny Particles With Negative Gravity*
>>
>> Futurism
>>
>> Important Update Conventional wisdom in physics dictates that sound
>> waves are massless fluctuations in pressure that travel through
>> materials like air, water, and eardrums — and can't travel through
>> empty space. That's why the recent discovery that sound waves
>> actually do carry a trace amount of mass is so shocking — it's been
>> right under scientists'... Read the full story
>> <https://futurism.com/sound-waves-particles-negative-gravity/>
>>
>>