Body
BTW, I think that to work on this kind of thing, it would help to have
sensitivity.
Sensitivity is not hard to gain, and most people have some anyway.
It gives you important feedback, because the tech that Dave is presenting,
and in truth all real Free Energy, the type we are seeking is all based on
aetheric/subtle energy/vacuum energy/orgone/chi/vibration or whatever names
you want to give it.
But, you have to actually try, and be open to it.
I think you will find evidence that the majority of the Free Energy
inventors felt these energies, they were sensitive to energy.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 12:39 PM John Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, Dave, it's easy enough if you use a universal motor to power the
> stator coils separately to the rotor.
> You can get a universal motor from basically any appliance that plugs into
> the wall with a decent motor power.
>
> Vacuum cleaners, or kitchen appliances are good bets.
>
> It just takes a little looking at the wiring scheme to separate the two
> likely without even cutting any wires.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:53 AM [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi All - Question
>>
>>
>> Has any one here used pulse modulations on the motors you are playing
>> with?
>>
>>
>> I always wanted to try a pi / 2 ratio between two different pulse trains
>> on a motor.
>>
>> I don't know if you can pulse the stator and rotor separatly to achieve
>> this, but you would need two different frequencies to mix in order to set
>> up a self sustaining form of vibraiton on the motor.
>>
>>
>> The vibration energy is contained in the direction of motion vector, and
>> is not per say electrical, although it can come from electrical modulation
>> at 90 degrees to both.
>>
>>
>> With an AC field however the field is in rotation.
>>
>>
>> Also wanted to point out that I have observed in my experiments,
>> vibration resonance has nothing to do with EM resonance althrough they can
>> be coupled at 2 times the AC waves frequency.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> We can also set up an 89 / 50 vibration ratio around a spinning mass to
>> lower it's resistance to acceleration.
>>
>> That is a ratio a bit larger then pi / 2.
>>
>>
>> Pi / 2 = 1.5707963 ...
>>
>>
>> 89 / 50 = 1.78
>>
>>
>> Thanks all for reading,
>>
>> Dave L
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>