Re: [EVGRAY] Re: shielding from EMP?

Database ID: 112473
2019-03-02T21:39:04+00:00
bart woodard <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
<YTBPR01MB24480C23DE66ABF2663007ECCE770@YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <YTBPR01MB2448F1F561DD9856FFEC7ED6CE770@YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Body

I will try to explain.
One year I packed up the family and headed off to Arizona.
There was or maybe still is a bussiness of a gentleman whom buys scrap military parts and pieces.
I bought almost a 1/4 ton lol
There were 6 toroidal on one arrayment. It was going from large to small in size.
8 inches next 7 next 6 and so on. It had a circuit on it.
Now I could not remember what the values were. Only one guy there told me to watch out for the fields coming off of it.
There were more weird kinds as well vortex like etc.
They were stolen from my shop. But the 6 toroidal one if you put almost anything in or on its openings it would severely alter it's value.
Sometimes blowing them.
The place was down past Phoenix.  I will check .
Prescott. I remember everything was super cheap.
So I was playing with the and seeing what would stand up and for how long kinda thing.  Diodes never took much.






Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada's largest network.


-------- Original message --------
From: "bart woodard [email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
Date: 2019-03-02 1:35 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] Re: shielding from EMP?



Mick Ole

I brought this up years ago with some retired electronic engineering friend's.
One dI'd mention occupied iron and another the mumetel which I played with.
I bought also at the time of sheet green in colour for showing magnetic fields.
I remember playing with it and testing out each value bench guessing lol
The occupied iron did work fairly well maybe enough?
I asked the group at the time as my shop was the place of drinking coffee and teas,
about preparing. One gentleman said keep all components fresh that have never been exposed to any value under a sheet of tin and if you can lead. Then should there be an incident
you are ok . It was about 2005 lol


Sent from my Bell Samsung device over Canada's largest network.


-------- Original message --------
From: "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <[email protected]>
Date: 2019-03-02 1:23 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EVGRAY] Re: shielding from EMP?



By the way it doesn't seem to be possible to shield the motional electric field. This makes even toroidal wound transformers radiate. The field from Alexey Chekurkov's levitating device destroys electronics. The Searl effect generator also interacts with electrical systems. Both of these devices having mechanical rotating charges make them generate motional electric fields.

Regards
Ole


---In [email protected], <onielsen@...> wrote :

Hi Mick,

Iron is a good magnetic shield. For fast rise time a good electrical conductor like copper or silver will do too. The magnetic field induces eddy currents in the electrical conductor which mirrors the magnetic field and thus cancels it on the inside or outside of the shield. Iron with its greater electrical resistance dissipates more of the magnetic field as heat.

Regards
Ole


---In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :

As we know the E field can be shielded by a Faraday cage while the B
field is another consideration.

What is the best way to shield electronics from the fast risetime HV B
field,  what type of cocoon would be best?

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>,<[email protected]>,<YTBPR01MB2448F1F561DD9856FFEC7ED6CE770@YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 29807 invoked by uid 102); 2 Mar 2019 21:39:06 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.196.204.226) by m15.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2019 21:39:06 -0000
X-Received (qmail 11211 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2019 21:39:06 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.194.219) by mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2019 21:39:06 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF pass (domain of hotmail.com designates 40.92.8.66 as permitted sender)
X-YMailISG CoFOcXYWLDvs6lHsylKY4.tha6uILlFfbKJwbFouZA1j.YBE x5lWjL7DGDx7CI9cZSH8ywHkWsEeoOuen4jtOSs7UBwmBoRxm5VWoxkHEO9q 0xBPYPxo3FBZbpd1tHUuA8q01NPqFOFQLvVtFw0ufEvjirH9O63Rc4DHCLMS dMbqm10iyU78wl2tJYcExrFLUtgt5Vu0evbQakMNLCWQrSQOCAZbbYaHurCC PRz46d.OmlbepHKQbegb67.NSTjbmKzBmv.uTWxWrZokyElGMpxoijV8HDpT bEQxXrppwqdfcQ7s4ntwkeCqSbmTHi5NHj4X8uvunY2AwmuMT.lUW40DoJOR 6hwbTGlipcwsY_nxq.dyTYt53M7PJZMdaNAhTA7yZ87V07IfWyLunRLRpjnU mxQf0wOKsG8EM.jHRMg3dhUMwlvUNANSoWmR2GZY_R7yc9F0HtaCyaKYktgP ZgsutGBfK_8m3F29E_btbO84a8LbD7RXHP.1kGLlsACzD1H9WonGISNHlcMn iVtI6fdl8e9rD9BLCXdmWvYdJE1bx9xpbUcYh42bA3zXnxkpUyvTjMz2rSUy CE.M83LtN16EE0qqe3_1K3cifRixH3eHwDLq3Jv_8M5uWuDfYTp38WrmxyD1 PjlJNjjw26v4t8H.i_rc4lt7wHVtnkppGk_hICVwpBTC4I7lrsEm_Nx4NfLH 7SQidWCSB9zA538ZxkGH57C0MGHCHozsAOB2F7BpjCJtxzclYiZFyDBf2SkH fGQMegeF33J5x9AF6AGWct4ntugRQFe5rPLx0DvsQumPTNEmNF13l_ryVDp9 sQ2BMdzTAZu6VyCpavGPj7Jpz2LdsUSAKTrLwKEerA6SJbghvgTcSP00FD9u x7TS_jwGzhW55iqthqX3chUrP4Widjj0rdTs8e0Cn.3Fj2sJNRN1DUcekTxI hEnSWf4588V8bQ70VFPW8tgg.zMj.JV6yEK.jUOyjiX7tmo3dybHJVJaeUTd NhmyWQGBh.WKv1o8D9SNysxCTt3Ht1GZyO3TI.u83joowNQSXa9Uf0pqeF6X u5eijrP9fp9jhA1AJl0DqfQRAtUzQMLPI_XLNp.ztC56p813mXtrVsxawuIC H_1pQJy965IWiEcZR9lz_PUF9oQrixM0xG9hWR6cal3Mt.EukUKczKWZXMZ3 J0biCMn3Ch5oLSR5ZVjO17yYzl.NTXma9iFyoaoP7oSogSnESulPXX_87X7L sTL8KlUAS9PWHF7g8NG3Lxp7nvrfZaQ14zL_HX3REUheRbNx39kz9R27Cuwl FlKOhosvbaQXoLGqgYkHbrLHT7vy9iTuw_fxPD47Uf91v_I3pcdAMmzdv28d wEhfdg1r8Y_Y1JLJfiYvj8vq0IQE2gVaSCFtwTwrwmf17sqGZ33MC17iY5ws d0xJZMWgE0x_aj_mghJwkKkIdzFDM3G7aAljSKhX93rmUxWD8Una3wdIZsZ_ z0tZCdPngw--
Authentication-Results mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [email protected]; header.s=selector1; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (40.92.8.66) by mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 21:39:06 +0000
X-Received from BY2NAM03FT051.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.51) by BY2NAM03HT212.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1643.13; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 21:39:05 +0000
X-Received from YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.84.52) by BY2NAM03FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1643.13 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 21:39:05 +0000
X-Received from YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::5426:3587:c5bb:5bea]) by YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::5426:3587:c5bb:5bea%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1665.019; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 21:39:05 +0000
To "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Thread-Topic [EVGRAY] Re: shielding from EMP?
Thread-Index AQHU0TK1zvnLgHHCwUePR52XQYEq36X4yQWAgAADcg+AABHa1w==
Date Sat, 02 Mar 2019 21:39:04 +0000
Message-ID <YTBPR01MB24480C23DE66ABF2663007ECCE770@YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>,<YTBPR01MB2448F1F561DD9856FFEC7ED6CE770@YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To <YTBPR01MB2448F1F561DD9856FFEC7ED6CE770@YTBPR01MB2448.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language en-CA, en-US
Content-Language en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator
x-incomingtopheadermarker OriginalChecksum:C6F2A952BBA8C9161437561036F04457DC2FB5EDED4FBF5A6D7A7FC737E16B55;UpperCasedChecksum:704CB350B58310329CFDB54F74876C892990EB822AD7943429EE36D22D4E88D8;SizeAsReceived:7108;Count:44
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype 1
x-tmn [5fy5YHPeSfpbHvjwW7MbvoIil1uuEA0E4Oml61+bPMiYnUli1KNbhNm79aSM1yeCB6w3AhmAuLE=]
x-ms-publictraffictype Email
x-incomingheadercount 44
x-eopattributedmessage 0
x-microsoft-antispam BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(20181119110)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322404)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045);SRVR:BY2NAM03HT212;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic BY2NAM03HT212:
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info sxrvVG8qqEqe0ziDv+CHk8iSaSfSpRkK4Hi84cF/BGFc7ROfmas8Y4Z+dcUF4W3t
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_YTBPR01MB24480C23DE66ABF2663007ECCE770YTBPR01MB2448CANP_"
MIME-Version 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id fd26db19-b0c4-49c9-f4a1-08d69f577e55
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime 02 Mar 2019 21:39:04.9096 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped BY2NAM03HT212
X-Originating-IP 10.201.194.219
Subject Re: [EVGRAY] Re: shielding from EMP?
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=370750413; y=2KxouVEY3vKZ6XfLlm8qapFLq7wiQcUS35al8vvpJ0Je
X-Yahoo-Profile okbart
From bart woodard <[email protected]>