Body
Yep, Warren, i'm surprised that some of those super efficient motors are
not on open market. I was surprised that an old machinist such as you
are did not tell me that that 35,000 lb. lathe had no aerodynamic
characteristics at all. Lol In photo At bottom left, the 2011
Tuscaloosa tornado hurled a train car weighing 71,600lbs 130 yards in
one throw, according to witnesses. At bottom right, the 1995 Pampa
tornado lifted a 35,000 lb lathe.
On 2/21/2019 9:37 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
[EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Hi Norman
>
> Oh, okay, I guess I might settle for an electric motor that can be
> bought off the shelf that is 317% efficient.
> That was 1995. Patents only last 17.5 years, so in another three
> years, we will likely be able to even buy a Chinese version!
> If the Japanese company is smart, they should start flogging their
> magic motor, real soon, if they aren't already. Maybe good cordless
> drills use such motors? Who would even know?
> Maybe the USB receptacle on the back of your Dewalt might give it away?
> Hector! You have been sleeping at the switch. We only get 1.614% from
> your RV! Shape up, and get to work, the Japanese are doing better!
> Imagine driving along the highway, in your Tesla clone, after a few
> hours, and feeling a hankering to do some recreational arc welding, at
> a roadside picnic area, burning off the surplus build up in the
> batteries?.
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 9:40 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Interesting reading when you go back to the 90s, NEN issues. See
> N199512s.pdf for more comments on the AG problem.
>
> On 2/21/2019 8:00 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Since Joel and I had theorized that the AG effect in the Neiper
>> Ring was attributed to a VIRTUAL ROTATION within the tetrahedral
>> lattice of the silicon crystal, I find the following discussion
>> very interesting in Research Gate. See the answers
>> https://www.researchgate.net/post/In_solid_pure_metals_are_the_atoms_allowed_to_rotate
>>
>> On 2/21/2019 7:49 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
>>>
>>> https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2016/04/the-weird-tale-of-the-man-who-discovered-gravity-shielding-ufo-like-technologies/
>>>
>>> https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-atomic-weight-604378
>>>
>>> https://www.dummies.com/education/science/chemistry/positive-and-negative-ions-cations-and-anions/
>>>
>>> https://www.thoughtco.com/difference-between-atomic-radius-and-ionic-radius-603819
>>>
>>> https://www.thoughtco.com/atomic-weight-and-atomic-mass-difference-4046144
>>>
>>> On 2/20/2019 7:56 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Want to have some fun with understanding Ion Coulomb Crystals
>>>> see Attached 1411.4945.pdf
>>>>
>>>> On 2/20/2019 7:35 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Took a lot of searching but found the Neiper Ring test and
>>>>> Circuit in New Energy News 1994. See attached
>>>>>
>>>>> Project Winterhaven http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE24.html
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.chem.wisc.edu/areas/clc/general/103/crystalLattices/lattices.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~jnord/geol302/symmetry/symmetry.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://vlab.amrita.edu/?sub=1&brch=282&sim=370&cnt=1
>>>>>
>>>>> See attached 6bf1fac3
>>>>>
>>>>> Joel & I agreed that there was virtual rotation within the
>>>>> tetrahedral lattice of the silicon in the TO3 transistors that
>>>>> was causing the weight loss in the Neiper Ring Circuit. Study
>>>>> the lattice structure of all the elements, 14 total
>>>>> structures. Have fun with your AG experiments. Norm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/20/2019 2:28 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2019-02-ions-tokamaks.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://m.phys.org/news/2017-04-simulations-diii-d-mysterious-plasma.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://m.phys.org/news/2016-10-scientists-ions-bombard-fusion-device.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most of you will say "What does all this have to do with AG
>>>>>> and Over-unity?? Well, as you can see even the big boys do
>>>>>> not have all the answers.. They are like a bunch of teens
>>>>>> learning how to drive Dads Olds. as Joel used to dsay.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/20/2019 9:25 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.exopolitics.org/stunning-flying-triangle-photos-confirm-usaf-secret-space-program/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/20/2019 8:17 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_it_possible_to_control_gravitation_using_an_electromagnetic_field
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please read attached, 0701091. pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2019 8:06 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_research
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gravity
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/lostjournals/lostjournals06.htm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jeane Manning, Please read this entire document!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Excerpt from
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When *Tesla* was 82, instead of speaking at a dinner
>>>>>>>>> party, he issued a written statement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Although this was soon after he had been struck by a car,
>>>>>>>>> his mind was obviously still capable of mounting an attack
>>>>>>>>> on Einstein's theory of relativity:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all
>>>>>>>>> details and hope to give this to the world very soon.
>>>>>>>>> It explains the causes of this force and the motions
>>>>>>>>> of heavenly bodies under its influence so
>>>>>>>>> satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle
>>>>>>>>> speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved
>>>>>>>>> space. According to the relativists, space has a
>>>>>>>>> tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or
>>>>>>>>> presence of celestial bodies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic
>>>>>>>>> idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every
>>>>>>>>> action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and
>>>>>>>>> the effects of the latter are directly opposite to
>>>>>>>>> those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act
>>>>>>>>> upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the
>>>>>>>>> same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved
>>>>>>>>> spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the
>>>>>>>>> opposite effects, straighten out the curves.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows
>>>>>>>>> that the supposed curvature of space is entirely
>>>>>>>>> impossible -However, even if it existed it would not
>>>>>>>>> explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only
>>>>>>>>> the existence of a field of force can account for them
>>>>>>>>> and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All
>>>>>>>>> literature on this subject is futile and destined to
>>>>>>>>> oblivion."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is a great pity that Tesla never published his dynamic
>>>>>>>>> theory of gravity. Modern thinking about gravity suggests
>>>>>>>>> that when a heavy object moves it emits gravitational
>>>>>>>>> waves that radiate at the speed of light. These gravity
>>>>>>>>> waves behave in similar ways to many other types of waves.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tesla's greatest inventions were all based on the /study
>>>>>>>>> of waves/. He always considered sound, light, heat, X-rays
>>>>>>>>> and radio waves to be related phenomena that could be
>>>>>>>>> studied using the same sort of math. His differences with
>>>>>>>>> Einstein suggest that he had extended this thinking to
>>>>>>>>> _gravity_.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the 1980s he was proved to be right. A study of energy
>>>>>>>>> loss in a double neutron star pulsar called PSR 1913 + 16
>>>>>>>>> proved that _gravity waves exist_. Tesla's idea that
>>>>>>>>> gravity is a field effect is now taken more seriously than
>>>>>>>>> Einstein took it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, Tesla never revealed what had led him to
>>>>>>>>> this conclusion. He never explained his theory of
>>>>>>>>> gravitation to the world. The attack he made on Einstein's
>>>>>>>>> work was considered outrageous by the scientific
>>>>>>>>> establishment of the time, and only now do we have enough
>>>>>>>>> understanding of gravity to realize that he was right.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BR8Ac7hxbg We all saw
>>>>>>>>> this at the New Energy Conference at Denver 1994.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2019 7:15 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://extremeplanet.me/tag/heaviest-moved-by-tornado/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *IVh. The Heaviest Object Ever Lifted by a Tornado*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed
>>>>>>>>>> in the desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of
>>>>>>>>>> the tornado's path, an oil production facility was
>>>>>>>>>> destroyed (at left) and three oil tanks weighing
>>>>>>>>>> 180,000lbs were moved three miles to the east. Two of the
>>>>>>>>>> tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40 degree
>>>>>>>>>> incline. This is one of the most impresive instances of
>>>>>>>>>> tornado damage ever recorded and perhaps the only
>>>>>>>>>> instance of an object over 100,000lbs being moved a great
>>>>>>>>>> distance.
>>>>>>>>>> <https://extremeplanet.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/largest-ever-moved-tornado.png>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed
>>>>>>>>>> in the desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of
>>>>>>>>>> the tornado’s path in Bakersfield Valley, a production
>>>>>>>>>> facility was destroyed (at left) and three oil tanks
>>>>>>>>>> weighing 180,000lbs were moved three miles to the east.
>>>>>>>>>> Two of the tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40
>>>>>>>>>> degree incline. This is one of the most impressive
>>>>>>>>>> instances of tornado damage ever recorded and perhaps the
>>>>>>>>>> only documented instance of an object over 100,000 lbs
>>>>>>>>>> being moved a long distance. (Images by Wayne Greene)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A note here of which I have stated before: "Bernoulli and
>>>>>>>>>> Newton's third Law" was not involved here.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Over many years, I have been experimenting with the
>>>>>>>>>> Negative Ion Generators which are so common for cleaning
>>>>>>>>>> environmental air and the supposed good health effects. I
>>>>>>>>>> have one running continuously in my home. Besides
>>>>>>>>>> creating some ozone via the formation of the tri-atomic
>>>>>>>>>> bond of oxygen you see the drop out of dust particles
>>>>>>>>>> from the air due to the charge. Yep you have to dust
>>>>>>>>>> frequently cause that is how the air cleaning principle
>>>>>>>>>> works. That is how they are used in the old bars, dance
>>>>>>>>>> halls etc. where there is heavy smoking. They were
>>>>>>>>>> called Smoke Eaters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That aside lets discuss some interesting facts regarding
>>>>>>>>>> negative ionization and the attendant effects. No one
>>>>>>>>>> noticed back in the early 90s that ALL, I say again, ALL
>>>>>>>>>> interesting discussion of the negative ionization effects
>>>>>>>>>> were removed from the Internet feed on purpose. Good
>>>>>>>>>> reason cause the paragraph at the beginning of this page
>>>>>>>>>> where objects weighing over 100,000 lbs. were moved is a
>>>>>>>>>> classic example of the anti-gravitic effects of
>>>>>>>>>> ionization of molecular lattice in material. When I first
>>>>>>>>>> got interested in the subject, you could go online and
>>>>>>>>>> pull up numerous interesting articles on the subject. One
>>>>>>>>>> of the most revealing articles was on the un-exploded
>>>>>>>>>> ordinance recovery, robotic vehicles which had too
>>>>>>>>>> frequent failures due to electronics on board over
>>>>>>>>>> heating. Engineers knew about negative ionization
>>>>>>>>>> cooling so they simply installed a HVDC power unit and
>>>>>>>>>> maintained a gross negative charge on the vehicle and it
>>>>>>>>>> remained cool in the scorching desert heat. Many
>>>>>>>>>> interesting articles have been removed from the Internet
>>>>>>>>>> on purpose.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now you ask, OK, smart ASS, how does it work"?
>>>>>>>>>> Examine the Schauberger Implosion Vortex phenomenon to
>>>>>>>>>> understand as in the case of a natural tornado, that
>>>>>>>>>> there is an inflow of warm, moist air tangentially into a
>>>>>>>>>> very strong low pressure region with extreme air
>>>>>>>>>> velocities being achieved. The low pressure gradient
>>>>>>>>>> causes the cooling and condensation of huge volumes of
>>>>>>>>>> moisture from the air with off the scale electrostatic
>>>>>>>>>> charge. PHASE CHANGE IS ELECTROSTATIC RE-ARRANGEMENT OF
>>>>>>>>>> ELECTRONS IN THE ATOMIC LATTICE. You in effect have the
>>>>>>>>>> worlds largest Van de Graff Generator. Reference the
>>>>>>>>>> Armstrong Electrostatic Steam Generator. In the high
>>>>>>>>>> velocity inflow air currents there are a huge number of
>>>>>>>>>> eddy vortex actions occurring which leave material
>>>>>>>>>> objects grossly ionized. Take it for what it is worth,
>>>>>>>>>> for I believe that the AG effect is due to gross
>>>>>>>>>> ionization of an object. The rapidity of the ionization
>>>>>>>>>> of an object causes a great amount of electron movement
>>>>>>>>>> in the molecular structure and the attendant
>>>>>>>>>> manifestation of electric fields ( Ole, Hooper Motional
>>>>>>>>>> electric field?? ) and Magnetic flux. Remember, if a
>>>>>>>>>> charge moves it creates an electric field with attendant
>>>>>>>>>> magnetic field. Physics 101.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate some feed back on these subjects for I
>>>>>>>>>> feel, sometimes that the class room is empty. Lol
>>>>>>>>>> Norm PS: Moray, there may be some plasma reconnect
>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon occurring here also.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>