Body
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_it_possible_to_control_gravitation_using_an_electromagnetic_field
Please read attached, 0701091. pdf
On 2/20/2019 8:06 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_research
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gravity
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics
>
> https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/lostjournals/lostjournals06.htm
>
> Jeane Manning, Please read this entire document!
>
> Excerpt from
>
> When *Tesla* was 82, instead of speaking at a dinner party, he issued
> a written statement.
>
> Although this was soon after he had been struck by a car, his mind was
> obviously still capable of mounting an attack on Einstein's theory of
> relativity:
>
> "I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and
> hope to give this to the world very soon. It explains the causes
> of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its
> influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle
> speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space.
> According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature
> owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies.
>
> "Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is
> still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an
> equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly
> opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act
> upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it
> appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the
> bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the
> curves.
>
> "Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the
> supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible -However, even
> if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as
> observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for
> them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All
> literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion."
>
> It is a great pity that Tesla never published his dynamic theory of
> gravity. Modern thinking about gravity suggests that when a heavy
> object moves it emits gravitational waves that radiate at the speed of
> light. These gravity waves behave in similar ways to many other types
> of waves.
>
> Tesla's greatest inventions were all based on the /study of waves/. He
> always considered sound, light, heat, X-rays and radio waves to be
> related phenomena that could be studied using the same sort of math.
> His differences with Einstein suggest that he had extended this
> thinking to _gravity_.
>
> In the 1980s he was proved to be right. A study of energy loss in a
> double neutron star pulsar called PSR 1913 + 16 proved that _gravity
> waves exist_. Tesla's idea that gravity is a field effect is now taken
> more seriously than Einstein took it.
>
> Unfortunately, Tesla never revealed what had led him to this
> conclusion. He never explained his theory of gravitation to the world.
> The attack he made on Einstein's work was considered outrageous by the
> scientific establishment of the time, and only now do we have enough
> understanding of gravity to realize that he was right.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BR8Ac7hxbg We all saw this at the New
> Energy Conference at Denver 1994.
>
>
> On 2/20/2019 7:15 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> https://extremeplanet.me/tag/heaviest-moved-by-tornado/
>>
>> *IVh. The Heaviest Object Ever Lifted by a Tornado*
>>
>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed in the
>> desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of the tornado's path,
>> an oil production facility was destroyed (at left) and three oil
>> tanks weighing 180,000lbs were moved three miles to the east. Two of
>> the tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40 degree incline.
>> This is one of the most impresive instances of tornado damage ever
>> recorded and perhaps the only instance of an object over 100,000lbs
>> being moved a great distance.
>> <https://extremeplanet.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/largest-ever-moved-tornado.png>
>>
>>
>> In June of 1990, an exceptionally violent tornado formed in the
>> desert-land of southwest Texas. Near the end of the tornado’s path in
>> Bakersfield Valley, a production facility was destroyed (at left) and
>> three oil tanks weighing 180,000lbs were moved three miles to the
>> east. Two of the tanks were found 600ft up a hillside with a 40
>> degree incline. This is one of the most impressive instances of
>> tornado damage ever recorded and perhaps the only documented instance
>> of an object over 100,000 lbs being moved a long distance. (Images by
>> Wayne Greene)
>>
>> A note here of which I have stated before: "Bernoulli and Newton's
>> third Law" was not involved here.
>>
>> Over many years, I have been experimenting with the Negative Ion
>> Generators which are so common for cleaning environmental air and the
>> supposed good health effects. I have one running continuously in my
>> home. Besides creating some ozone via the formation of the tri-atomic
>> bond of oxygen you see the drop out of dust particles from the air
>> due to the charge. Yep you have to dust frequently cause that is how
>> the air cleaning principle works. That is how they are used in the
>> old bars, dance halls etc. where there is heavy smoking. They were
>> called Smoke Eaters.
>>
>> That aside lets discuss some interesting facts regarding negative
>> ionization and the attendant effects. No one noticed back in the
>> early 90s that ALL, I say again, ALL interesting discussion of the
>> negative ionization effects were removed from the Internet feed on
>> purpose. Good reason cause the paragraph at the beginning of this
>> page where objects weighing over 100,000 lbs. were moved is a classic
>> example of the anti-gravitic effects of ionization of molecular
>> lattice in material. When I first got interested in the subject, you
>> could go online and pull up numerous interesting articles on the
>> subject. One of the most revealing articles was on the un-exploded
>> ordinance recovery, robotic vehicles which had too frequent failures
>> due to electronics on board over heating. Engineers knew about
>> negative ionization cooling so they simply installed a HVDC power
>> unit and maintained a gross negative charge on the vehicle and it
>> remained cool in the scorching desert heat. Many interesting
>> articles have been removed from the Internet on purpose.
>>
>> Now you ask, OK, smart ASS, how does it work"? Examine the
>> Schauberger Implosion Vortex phenomenon to understand as in the case
>> of a natural tornado, that there is an inflow of warm, moist air
>> tangentially into a very strong low pressure region with extreme air
>> velocities being achieved. The low pressure gradient causes the
>> cooling and condensation of huge volumes of moisture from the air
>> with off the scale electrostatic charge. PHASE CHANGE IS
>> ELECTROSTATIC RE-ARRANGEMENT OF ELECTRONS IN THE ATOMIC LATTICE. You
>> in effect have the worlds largest Van de Graff Generator. Reference
>> the Armstrong Electrostatic Steam Generator. In the high velocity
>> inflow air currents there are a huge number of eddy vortex actions
>> occurring which leave material objects grossly ionized. Take it for
>> what it is worth, for I believe that the AG effect is due to gross
>> ionization of an object. The rapidity of the ionization of an object
>> causes a great amount of electron movement in the molecular structure
>> and the attendant manifestation of electric fields ( Ole, Hooper
>> Motional electric field?? ) and Magnetic flux. Remember, if a charge
>> moves it creates an electric field with attendant magnetic field.
>> Physics 101.
>>
>> I would appreciate some feed back on these subjects for I feel,
>> sometimes that the class room is empty. Lol Norm PS: Moray,
>> there may be some plasma reconnect phenomenon occurring here also.
>>
>>