Knowledge of the Ancients, Sacred Geometry

Database ID: 112310
2019-02-18T08:53:42-06:00
Norman Wootan <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

On 2/18/2019 8:32 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> https://youtu.be/zoMk0estzXc    The TIMDIVIC as discussed on the old KeelyNet BBS  was a magnet runner track device that used the Orthagonal Magnet flux interaction that mimiced the Sacred Geometry Theory of the Vesica Pieces as shown in the video.   Yes, the device was a rip off of the Searle magnet roller System.  The dialog of the development of this system is hundreds of pages of dialog from the 1995 BBS of which I captured.
>
> See:      ===============================================================================
>
> Message 10870                                  DATE/TIME: 01/24/95 00:22
> >From   : NORMAN COMPARINI
> To     : ALL
> Subject: TMIDEVIC
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hello, all:
> Regarding the system described in this file, my own crude experiments
> show that the system works to the degree that it will accelerate the
> runner from zero velocity ( and no input force ) over several ramps (
> POSITIVE change in potential energy, PE ) via magnetic rails.
> The key to this system's motion seems to be the use of attract forces
> of the magnet to "pull" where needed, but then the earth's gravity to
> break free from the magnet to "reset " the system subset. It must
> break free or it will oscillate between the magnetic poles and reach
> equillibrium. The sytem in this file uses a ramp to point the gravity
> vector in the proper direction.
> ..
> Momentuum also plays a role in getting the "use " of the
> gravitational force....hard to explain without sckketches.....
> ..
> I would like to know if anyone else has toyed with this design, as it
> does not seem overly complex, and I feel that I am most likely
> overlooking a subtlty ety that .......It
> is interesting how the runner, being orthogonal to the two rails, is
> able to sustain linear motion, and the goeometry cancels the torques
> generated by two bar magnets out of parallel.....
> ..
> Help anyone?
> ..
> norm ( no, the other one )
> ===============================================================================
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 10916                                  DATE/TIME: 01/25/95 23:13
> >From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: (R) Timedevice
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hi Norm!  Well, I built one tonite and it does exactly as described...a
> cleaner construction with a guided pathway will make it run more better
> and I think the alternately opposed tracks would work as
> described...will clean it up some and try the alternate track thingy
> for the next meeting....interesting principle, though a bit ragged in
> the initial form...>>>  Jerry
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 10917                                  DATE/TIME: 01/25/95 23:17
> >From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : NORMAN COMPARINI
> Subject: TMIDEVIC Works
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hi Norm!  Well, I did what you did and whupped one of those TMIDEVIC
> things together tonight...it works just as described, most interesting
> and I see why he needs the decline right after the top of the magnets
> are reached...No doubt with a bit more refined construction such as a
> smoother roller setup and a guided pathway, this dog'll hunt!
> However, from what I can see of how the thing operates I think the
> hamster cage apparatus won't work as first thought....but it leads to
> some interesting speculations....I will let you know anything else that
> comes of it designwise....>>>  Jerry
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 10918                                  DATE/TIME: 01/25/95 23:20
> >From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> To     : GLENDA STOCKS
> Subject: Refer 10917
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hi Glenda!  Just wanted to let you know that Norman C. and I both have
> duplicated the TMIDEVIC that you shared with KeelyNet and it does as
> described....very simple, yet intriquing...will let you know what comes
> out of it as to alternative designs and that includes Stewart
> Harris...thanks for passing it along....>>>  Jerry
> ===============================================================================
> Message 10930                                  DATE/TIME: 01/26/95 05:38
> >From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> To     : NORMAN COMPARINI
> Subject: (R) Magnet drive
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hi Norm!  As to getting power out of it, I have not even considered
> that aspect because the thing has not proven unity, itself...if that
> circular or U track allows it to run around powered exclusively from
> the magnetic repulsion, then maybe a different geometry might be worth
> trying....I agree with you....something I noticed on mine...the more
> magnets I added to the sideways stack, the less overall force it
> had....20 magnets per side seems to give about the greatest thrust
> using a 10 magnet roller...that is an odd phenomenon that I don't
> understand at this point...any ideas on why the force would seem to
> weaken??  All I can think of is the longer magnet causes the field
> lines to be more separated and thus weaker...>>>  Jerry
> ===============================================================================
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 10996                                  DATE/TIME: 01/28/95 09:57
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: TMI Plans
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> For those who may be interested in building a TMIDEVIC, here are
> the measurements off mine, and it works, so it is a place to start.
>   
> The magnets are Radio Shack part number 64-1885, normally 39 cents
> each, but on sale now for 15 cents each.  It costs $8.89, incl. the
> sales tax, to buy the required 50 magnets.  You will also need tape,
> 48 pennies, and a piece of corrugated cardboard.  It takes about
> 30 minutes to put it together.  You can either use a magnetic compass
> or "trial and error" to get the magnets into position.
>   
> Cut a piece of cardboard 8 1/2 inches by 6 1/4 inches.  Fold it so
> that each "up ramp" is three inches long, and each "down ramp" is
> 1 1/4 inches long.  Under the peak of each up ramp you will need
> support, so tape together two stacks of pennies, six in each stack,
> and put a stack under the middle top of each up ramp.
>   
> Put together ten magnets.  They hold together pretty well as a result
> of their attractions, but you may want to smoothly tape around them
> anyway.  This is the "runner".  The magnet stacks along the sides of
> the "up ramps" have a penny in between each adjacent magnet, so you
> will want to tape around each stack.  Make these stacks, and set them
> aside.  Cut and prefold the cardboard.  Next, you will tape the side
> stacks to the top of the cardboard "up ramps".
>   
> If you are using a compass, the magnetic alignment will be:
>   
> second down ramp
>   
> N             S  second
>                     up
> S             N  ramp
>           
> first down ramp
>   
> N             S  first
>                     up
> S             N  ramp
>   
>       S N         runner
>   
> The height of each ramp from the table top will be 9/16 inch, which is
> the height of the six penny stack plus the thickness of the cardboard.
> If you experiment with this and get better results with your own
> methods, please share the information.
> As Mr. Rogers might say, "Can you say MONOPOLE?"
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11003                                  DATE/TIME: 01/28/95 18:49
> >From   : NORMAN WOOTAN                      -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> Subject: TMIDEVIC
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Jerry:  I went out to Joel's and looked at his magnetic motor perform
> and we discussed at least a dozen possibilities to make it into a
> continous running motor.  "HOT".  Everyone will jump right on this one
> for it has so many- many applications.  When kids drag this little
> experiment to school and show it to their science teachers they will
> simply go "NUTS".  Ha! Ha!  Next thing will be a run on Radio Shack
> magnets, and their computer was go crazy trying to figure out where
> this demand came from for magnets that last week they could not give
> away.  Well to put it this way they put them on sale for they were
> moving too slow.Sounds sort of like we were all buying parts for the
> "Lee Trippett" circuit.  tHEY PROBABLY NEVER FIGURED OUT THAT DEMAND
> CURVE ON THE COMPUTER SYSTEM EITHER.  Norm
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11019                                  DATE/TIME: 01/29/95 12:41
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : GLENDA STOCKS
> Subject: TMI..and thanks!
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Glenda,
>   
> Actually, Stewart Harris and you did the favor for US by sharing
> his ideas here...I'd like to know more about stewart's Theory of
> Magnetic Instability.  It's intriguing because, although the poles
> of the magnets are aligned for a net repulsion, Stewart sees some
> other definition of the forces at play.  His definition works, as
> opposed to that of his detractors, who apparently in their frus-
> tration and desperation, have chosen to question him, instead of
> actually building and analyzing the working device.
>   
> Magnets are holographic and like holograms, maintain their image
> memory in tiny molecule-sized fractal pieces.  The forces which
> create magnets force the substrate to simultaneously expand and
> contract, then "freeze" the energy/matter into an imbalance.  Mag-
> nets are, I believe, in a constant state of energy collapse, which
> is why they "attract" materials which have molecular structures which
> "resemble" their own.  As with any hologram, we see the effect, not
> the 3-space reality.
>   
> Stewart has been able to see and comprehend the reality, where science
> has, by definition, limited itself to the (measurable) effect...and
> it misses the boat.  The "instability" part of Stewart's theory would,
> I think, bridge the gap for us, if he will be kind enough to share it.
> Stewart is a seeker (and sharer) of truth...he has friends here.
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11044                                  DATE/TIME: 01/30/95 12:36
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: All aboard!!
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> The TMIDEVIC can be laid out as a "train track", and the "runner"
> can be placed anyplace within that track, and it will move forward.
> As it moves, it gains speed.  I suspect that with a long enough track
> and low enough surface tension, it might attain high velocity.
>   
> The implications of this are enormous for rail transportation, far
> superior to the "mag-lev" designs currently being built in Japan and
> Germany.  While there may still be a need for generators on TMI type
> trains, for air conditioning, etc., the actual drive power is zero.
> Small electromagnets could be used on the train for acceleration and
> braking.
>   
> For the "return trip", just reverse the magnets on the train.  So much
> more can be done...this is just one example.  Converting the magnetic
> fields into circular rotation as Stewart Harris did can begin to
> eliminate our reliance on fossil fuels.  Mass transportation can be
> much cheaper than ever thought possible.
>   
> The same principles will allow the electrical power that is needed to
> be generated without any type of fuels.  Regardless of what is said
> today, I suspect that Mr. Harris will be remembered by history.
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11048                                  DATE/TIME: 01/30/95 14:08
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN                       -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: TMI Geometry
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Norm,
>   
> Look at the TMIDEVIC again...the round magnets have torus shaped
> fields.  The 90 degree relationship between the runner and the rails
> creates intersections at vesica pisces coordinates, which creates
> a vortical energy flow on both ends of the runner, and the energy
> increases as the number of intersections increases with the speed
> of the runner.  This dog can warp.
>   
> Joel
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11077                                  DATE/TIME: 01/31/95 09:43
> >From   : BERT POOL                          -- PRIVATE --    -- RECEIVED --  
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN (FORWARDED)
> Subject: Rollin', rollin', rollin' down de river
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> NOTE: The following message was originally addressed to JOEL MCCLAIN
>        and was forwarded to you by Bert Pool on 01/31/95 at 09:50
>                               --------------------
> Joel,
> I'm not going to be able to build one of the roller magnet thingies for
> quite some time yet.  I've got those little round magnets stuck all
> over the inside of the cab of my truck, and my main observation is that
> they suck (or maybe don't suck enough?).  They are pitifully weak!
> I've not seen ads for neodymium magnets in this shape, but I bet they
> are made.  What would this thing do with neo mags, say about 50 times
> more powerful than what you are currently using?  Would it lock up, or
> would it go ballistic?  If you are getting positive results with these
> wimpy magnets, it might be very worth while to test with doughnut neos.
>   I volunteer $25.00 toward purchase of these neos, if a source can be
> found.   >> Bert
> ===============================================================================
> essage 11083                                  DATE/TIME: 01/31/95 11:18
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN                       -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : BERT POOL
> Subject: TMI Geometry
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Bert,
>   
> I'd suggest using the cheap magnets at first, until you decide how
> you want to construct your project.  Magnetism is secondary to
> geometry, and it is a matter of scale, not of effect.  The effect
> is the same.  Even the weak magnets will accelerate uphill and
> break the attraction at the top.  PHI is the key, and it is constant
> regardless of the (relative) strength of the magnets.
>   
> It is in the overlap of the fields where vesica pisces forms, and this
> is the PHI coordinate, where the same etheric energy which causes
> particle spin will rotate the magnets.  TMI applies sacred geometry
> in a way which utilizes etheric energy and that is why it violates
> the "known" laws of physics.  TMI also shows us how to end our need
> for fossil and nuclear fuels.
>   
> Joel
> ======================================================================
> Message 11084                                  DATE/TIME: 01/31/95 12:08
> >From   : BERT POOL                          -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : JOEL MCCLAIN
> Subject: Rollin'
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Joel,
> Does the device accelerate the entire length of the track?
> If so, is the acceleration linear or exponential?
> I have a circuit that should allow us to measure the velocity at any
> desired point.  If the acceleration is exponential, then a relatively
> short track should allow acceleration of this device to absolutely
> incredible speeds.  If acceleration is linear, then a relatively short
> track should allow acceleration to "only" incredible speeds.  I know
> the device as shown in the plans uses ramps.  Will the mobile part
> accelerate on a track with no ramps?  If so, the acceleration should be
> higher on a flat track v.s. a ramped track.  Comments?
> Bert
> ===============================================================================
>   > Message 11003
>   > DATE/TIME: 01/28/95 18:49
>   > From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
>   > To     : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
>   > Subject: TMIDEVIC
>   > Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>   
>   > Jerry: I went out to Joel's and looked at his magnetic motor
>   > perform and we discussed at least a dozen possibilities to make
>   > it into a continuous running motor. "HOT".
>   
> [...]
>   
> ******************************** I offer:
>   
> Actually, I had heard that Radio Shack was going to discontinue this
> line of magnets. But they are available from most magnet
> manufacturers, and in greater variations of strengths. I have had
> models which constantly lift a runner which weighs about a pound.
>   
> As for the kids and schools and science teachers, this TMI device
> has already won a Clark County Science Fair for a 14-year-old boy,
> and he almost won the State prize but got a bit uppity with the
> judges and ended up second. Plus, he got uppity because the judges
> neither understood what it was nor believed it was not a sham.
>   
> [...]
>   
> Thanks again for your assistance. It seems my PMM devices will
> become realities in the very near future. I don't know what the
> science world will do. They forecast doom if I am right, yet I am
> certain they will exert their outer limits of flexibility and come
> to some consensus acceptable to all. I hope so. I certainly never
> meant any harm to scientists or science; and I find it ridiculous
> for anyone to believe I, one person, could do any harm.
>   
> Best Regards,
> Stewart Harris
>   
> Internet:[email protected]
> Internet:[email protected]
> Las Vegas - Home of High Rollers, Aliens and the Good Life
>              and Continuous Motion!!
> ... All things are difficult before they are easy.
>   * TLX v4.00 *
> --- Alexi/Mail 2.02b (#31)
>   * Origin: Vegas PlayGround BBS * LV, NV * 24 Nodes * (1:209/276)
>   
> ===============================================================================
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11103                                  DATE/TIME: 02/01/95 01:02
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : GLENDA STOCKS
> Subject: Message for Bill Teague
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Bill,
>   
> Life is based upon only two number sequences: binary and PHI, or
> Fibronacci.  Every bone in every vertebrate has a PHI relationship
> with a connecting bone.  All of the dimensions of butterfly body
> size, wing width to height, etc., are PHI.  The nautilus shell is
> a perfect Fibronacci, starting with PHI before it is even over one.
> Sunflower spirals are always 3 or 5 in one direction with 8 or 13
> in the other direction, corresponding with Fibronacci.  The spiral
> galaxy is a Fibronacci spiral.  Plants grow blossoms according to
> the Fibronacci series.
>   
> Cellular mitosis is binary.  Octave progressions are binary, although
> note progressions are in PHI intervals within the octaves.  The human
> spine is tuned with PHI ratios in adjacent discs and octave intervals
> in the spacing.  The upper and lower body halves are a PHI ratio.
> Standing with arms extended to the side is a PHI rectangle, within
> 1/10000 of an inch for an average group of people.  It takes 46 cell
> divisions in binary sequence to replace all of the cells in the body,
> and 46 is also the number of our chromosomes.
>   
> It takes 13 sperm working in unison before one is able to enter to
> fertilize the egg.  The sperm loses its tail, and grows to the exact
> size of the egg, and intersects with it at exactly vesica pisces,
> or where its outer edge touches the center of the egg.  This is the
> zero point, and from here life begins.
>   
> These examples are in all of nature.  The Greeks used them in all of
> their art, because they understood the geometry.  The Romans didn't
> have a clue, which is why Greek art is very beautiful while Roman art
> of the same era is rather ugly.  Most people, if they ever study PHI
> in geometry are never taught how this is used outside of geometry.
> It needs to be taught in music, and music needs to be taught in all
> science courses, or they miss the boat.  Hope this helps!
>   
> Joel
> ===============================================================================
>   Mick, do you understand why I said you need a crash course in Sacred Geometry??
>
>
> Message 11104                                  DATE/TIME: 02/01/95 01:03
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : BERT POOL
> Subject: Riiiver
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Bert,
>   
> It's hard to describe without a picture of the power waveform super-
> imposed over the distance waveform.  The power leads the movement
> like a square wave and a sine wave starting at the same point, be-
> cause the power zero point occurs low in the distance curve, so the
> peak pull differential becomes less as the roller gets higher. The
> roller is starting to slow down before reaching the top of the
> incline.
>   
> However, the roller has enough inertia to pass the attractions at
> the top of the incline, and start down the ramp.  The power wave-
> form stays above the zero point, and the peaks "fill in" if you
> draw overlapping circles which encompass the overlapping waves.
>   
> The overlaps are the vesica pisces coordinates, and they are where
> the logarithmic spirals can be seen, which are the zero points as
> far as power curve peaks.  Now, since the TMI starts out going up-
> hill, it seems reasonable that it should run like a bunny on a flat
> track, and it does, and just keeps going faster.  BTW, on the ramp
> version, if the "rail" magnets are on the table instead of on the
> ramp, the runner is faster because the net attraction at the top of
> the incline is offset by the angular displacement of the fields.
>   
> Clear as mud, right?
>   
> Joel
> ===============================================================================
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11108                                  DATE/TIME: 02/01/95 07:13
> >From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : GLENDA STOCKS
> Subject: TMIDEVIC
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Glenda:  Several things have transpired over the last week on the net
> that had me really "puzzled" then I realized what was occuring.  See I
> work everyday like most people and come home in the evenings and catch
> up on the messages on the Keely-Net. Since Joel and I are partners and
> share all data and information that we fall heir to I have a habbit of
> calling Joel and discussing all the details as to what has been posted
> to the Net during the course of the day.  Since Joel works out of his
> home he is responding during the day to messages and posting results of
> our discussions and project progress.  What became obvious to me was
> that I had become a "transparent" party to the action.  What made me
> realize this was a comment made by someone (I never forget little
> comments) that Joel had more info on the "hydrosonic pump".  The
> hydrosonic pump research was a project that I started back last summer
> and Joel got interested in the strange phenomenon that I reported on
> the Net.  As a result of these experiments that we jointly conducted we
> became "attached at the brain", Ha! hA!. I promise that I'll try to
> post thoughts and ideas on the board in the future instead of just
> calling Joel this way you guys and gals will see both sides of the
> conversation instead of just one side.  What I am saying is that Joel
> and I have both been involved in a "crash course" on "Sacred Geometry"
> so that we can see how all these things work in nature.  On the TMI
> device Joel and I have worked out a full sustaining method of making
> the TMI not only run itself continously but generate power in the
> process and if you so desire take "flight" just like the Searle Disk.
> Last night I went out to Joel's and we had a long visit during which we
> worked outr a lot of the details as to how the device actually worked
> and how it related to the Searle rollers.  After I got back home I ran
> several test on the magnet runner for I was interested in the
> relationship between the fixed track portions and the rotating magnetic
> runner or roller. The interesting phenomenon here is that the runner
> has to be rotating or the device will not provide the necessary thrust
> to continue to move.  One very interesting point that Stewart mentioned
> was that he used the "tinker toy" wheels to slow down the roller.  Well
> what I did was increase the spin rate of the roller or runner by the
> Phi rate in relation to the fixed magnetic track and found that the
> intersecting vesica pieces vortex paterns were multiplied to the extent
> that this thing has incredible thrust and does not need the broken
> segments in the track as per the original plans.  The track can be a
> continous vortical or helixal magnetic flow with the runner magnetic
> vortex intersecting at 90 degrees to provide 3D nested visica pieces
> vortices.  Very interesting little device which as Joel properly put
> it, "This dog will WARP".  A very true statement for what you will have
> created is a very simplified version of John Searle's SEG. For you non
> indoctrinated out there that means Searle Effect Generator. This thing
> properly constructed will not only run itself but generate plenty of
> excess power in the process.  The biggest problem you are faced is that
> if you ever lose the laod on it you will have the same problem that
> John Searle had in that your home powering generator will simply
> accelerate to the critical velocity of the rollers and simply fly away
> leaving a hole in your roof.  All kind of possibilities here.  Thanks
> for sharing this little device with the world.  Everyone will have fun
> with this one.  Norm
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11128                                  DATE/TIME: 02/01/95 20:34
> >From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : BERT POOL
> Subject: (R) Rollin'
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Bert, et al!  Stewart says the reason he calls it TOMI (Theory Of
> Magnetic Instability) is because something odd happens when you join
> individual magnets as opposed to one long magnet....there seem to be
> little circles of influence where the fields don't blend totally and
> these act as stairsteps of alternate repulsion/attraction....he says
> you can try to use a long bar or cylinder magnet and it won't work.
> He is definitely onto something with the observation....spoke with him
> Sunday and have put him in contact with a friend who owns a
> manufacturing and distribution company, both are very excited and
> coming up with various doo-dads to market as novelties and
> toys....really glad to see something is happening for Stewart, but it
> is still young at this point as they are new to each other....something
> about this reminds me of the barium 'flutter' as in the Sweet device
> and also the Gary magnetic motor....>>>  Jerry
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11146                                  DATE/TIME: 02/02/95 00:17
> >From   : STEVE THATCHER                     -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : JOEL MCCLAIN
> Subject: (R) MRA and other stuff
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> I certainly want to put my efforts in the best possible direction. I
> have read all the messages concerning the TMI device and haven't put
> together a mental model that I can build yet. It does sound simple
> though. The thoughts I have been having regarding magnetism, electron
> flow, photons, and emf all lump them in a similar category. Does anyone
> therize that a photon stream carries a perpendicular magentic field
> with it for example. I haven't studied up on the new photon theories
> yet, but this one just kind of popped up as a question in my mind. Has
> anyone produced a simple diagram for the tmi device? Maybe something
> more concrete then message discussions will prompt me to order some
> parts from Edmunds. Best regards, Steve Thatcher
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11149                                  DATE/TIME: 02/02/95 01:00
> >From   : GERALD O'DOCHARTY                  -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: (R) TMIDEVIC
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Norm, you said:
> >what I did was increase the spin rate of the roller or runner by the
> >Phi rate in relation to the fixed magnetic track and found that the
> >intersecting vesica pieces vortex paterns were multiplied to the extent
> >that this thing has incredible thrust and does not need the broken
> >segments in the track as per the original plans. 
>   
> Could you elaborate on what you mean by "..Phi rate in relation to the
> fixed magnetic track.."? This sounds very interesting.
>   
> THX,
> -Gerald
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11158                                  DATE/TIME: 02/02/95 07:20
> >From   : PAUL VISINGER                      -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> Subject: (R) Lurker making contribution
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hi Jerry,
> Thanks for the upgrade.  I've been busy reading the past messages.
> But I did take time to build a TMI device and it really works.  Now I
> need to search my current download for thoughts on the "Flapper" or the
> "Tireless Magnetic Rodent".  I couldn't believe how the roller took
> off!  Thanks to Joel for his instructions and especially for the tip for
> about the Radio Shack part number.  Bye, Paul.
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11169                                  DATE/TIME: 02/02/95 10:50
> >From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : GLENDA STOCKS
> Subject: Miracle of Flight in Nature
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Glenda:  I read with great interest the message from Billy Teague where
> he mentioned the flight of Hummingbirds bees and all of the other
> Natural Aeronaughts.  Since Joel and I are well into our education on
> the "Sacred Geometry" then the following becomes perfectly obvious to
> the "informed.  Back some time ago there was a very good segment run on
> PBS television (Nature or some other organization) about flight in
> nature. When they showed a high speed photo sequence of a hummingbird
> at a hover the researchers traced the wing tip paths and guess what
> this trace drew?  You are on the right track for now I can relate this
> tracing directly to the VESICA PIECES that are nestred and intersected
> exactly the same way that your little TMI device magnetic vortices
> intersect to establish (running through the center of the vesica pieces
> a resulting thrust vector which causes the lift. The energy is in the
> form of resonant standing waves created by the wing beats or strokes
> and are actually acoustic in fact. When you look carefully at the
> intersecting wave forms they do not intersect straight on but are
> actually closer to a 90 degree  melding which results in the thrust
> vector being established.  When I went through the civilian and
> military flight schools we mathmatically proved that insects such as
> the hugh Japanese beatles and large bumblebees could not possibly fly
> for the wing loading would be incredible and simply could not be done.
> Well "mother nature" gave these little creatures the secret of the
> "SCARED GEOMETRY" to achieve what our physics say is impossible. Can
> you say there is a lot of power in resonant geometry?  You bet and the
> more we learn about it the more we will explain about the "NATURE" all
> around us.  There you have it, the secret of flight, just wish we had
> the knowledge to apply it to our transportation problems. Maybe there
> is something behind Jerry's men in silve suits seen flying around
> useing some sort of acoustic resonant fields.  more later.  Norm
> ===============================================================================
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11171                                  DATE/TIME: 02/02/95 14:37
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN                       -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : BERT POOL
> Subject: Dances With Cows
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> Howdy Bert,
>   
> As the roller begins to move, it intersects more magnetic flux waves
> per unit of time, which increases force per unit of distance, which
> increases speed, which cause it to intersect more magnetic flux waves,
> and so on.  That is the advantage over a bar magnet, which has only
> one set of distributed flux lines.  Each of the little bagel magnets
> (too hard to be donuts) has its own torus field.
>   
> As to whether to use thick or thin magnets, and where to use them,
> if the above paragraph is accurate, then thicker magnets would be
> similar to bar magnets and tend to slow it down.  I've found that
> adding pennies between the magnets has the opposite effect, so that
> thinner magnets with equal gauss and more spacing might be best.
> You might even put springs in between the magnets at the start of
> the track to give it a "slingshot" effect.
>   
> The Radio Shack magnets have a 4.5:1 ratio of width to diameter, so
> at the "giddy-up", you already have a lot of torque.  A lot of thin
> magnets would overcome inertia from startup, where spaced thick mag-
> nets would govern speed.
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11173                                  DATE/TIME: 02/02/95 17:12
> >From   : BERT POOL                          -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : JOEL MCCLAIN
> Subject: (R) Dances With Cows
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> Joel,
>   
> If the TMI device can be extended into a cyclic device, i.e., a roller
> on a continuous track, the obvious result would be a free energy
> device.  If it can be done using permanent magnets, then it can be done
> using electromagnets.  A permanent magnet design would be super-simple;
> only one moving part, no adjustments, etc., which is a good thing so far
> as reliability goes.  But if you use electromagnets, you gain
> magnitudes of order more control over the operating conditions.  If you
> build a circular track device, and start changing the spacing between
> the magnets, then you will by definition change the diameter of the
> loop, which means large mechanical changes, which is a pain.  If you
> can do the equivalent thing by turning a potentiometer, life is much
> easier.  I expect a simple machine to use perm. magnets, and a machine
> which can be regulated will use electromagnets in at least the track.
> Actually, as I think about it, if you were to replace the roller magnet
> assembly with a coil/armature, as it passes the stationary magnets it
> becomes an electromagnet.....hmmmm, might work, yes?
> >> bert
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11196                                  DATE/TIME: 02/03/95 07:58
> >From   : PAUL VISINGER
> To     : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)
> Subject: (R) Lurker making contribution
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hi Jerry.  I'v been having great fun playing with my TMI device.  When
> the roller took off for the first time I was amazed and still am for
> that matter.  It required no finger push, in fact, I had to hold on to
> it to get it into the proper position.  I thought, "This must of been
> what John Searle originally played with."  So, I want to know more.
> Where can I find out about "vesica pieces" -- I've seen it mentioned in
> quite a few messages.  Just point me in the right direction, specific
> references would be much appreciated.  Bye, Paul.
> P.S.  I've built several different configurations but now I want to go
> circular!
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11197                                  DATE/TIME: 02/03/95 08:07
> >From   : PAUL VISINGER                      -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: TMIdevice
> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>
> Hi Norm.  If you've already answered this question I'll get it from the
> downloaded messages or if you're too busy I'll understand that too.
> I've built several different versions of the TMIdevice.  The version
> Joel described, a flat one and a ramped one with the runners flat and
> now I want to build a circular one.  In message 11108 you mentioned
> that you, "Increased the spin rate of the roller or runner by the Phi
> rate in relation to the fixed magnetic track and found that the
> intersecting vesica pieces vortex paterns were multiplied..."  How did
> you increase the spin rate.  What is the Phi rate in relation to the
> fixed magnetic track.  What and where are the intersecting vesica
> pieces vortex patterns?  Any help would be appreciated.  I really like
> your work on the MRA.  Thanks.  Bye, Paul.
> ===============================================================================
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11200                                  DATE/TIME: 02/03/95 09:08
> >From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : PAUL VISINGER
> Subject: TMI Device
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Paul:  To answer your question which was asked by Gerald O'here goes.
> If you roll the runner magnet assembly along a track your have a fixed
> rate of helix magnetic flux interfaces that occur at 90 degree angles
> between the fixed track and the rotating runner.  If you mount the
> runner or roller on a stainless steel shaft and mount a pinnion gear at
> the inboard end or pivot end off the shaft running on a ring gear that
> is a greater number of teath by the Phi ratio them as the moving arm
> proceeds forward a spin rate of + Phi will be imparted on the spinning
> roller and you will have eliminated the friction contact with the
> track. Just visualize the differential gears in the rear-end of your
> car for it has a ring gear and pinnion in a hypoid gear set which
> allows a drive shaft RPM which is greater than the axle RPM by the gear
> ratio.  All I am doing is turning this arrangement around and letting
> the pinion gear turn faster that the fixed ring gear.  The central
> pivot shaft of the whole unit has a DC generator attached to provide
> the necessary loading to prevent the Searle Effect to progress to the
> point of "lift Off".  Believe me it will happen for when the rate of
> intersecting magnetic flux lines of i
> intersecting "vesica pieces" (will explain) are increasing  to the
> point that you have a plasma folding back on itself then you will start
> seeing a corona or pink glow which happens when this beast achieves
> it's "N" critical rotational speed.  Searle claimed 3000 RPM was the
> "N" crit on his disk but I'm sure it is a radius and perifial velocity
> relationship somehow.  Joel and I have tested the increased spin rate
> and it does allow for a greater number of flux line intersections which
> increases the torque and acceleration of the unit.  We have resolved
> the entire unit so that you do not have to have the broken segments it
> the fixed magnet unit which we have formed into a contiuous circle with
> only one outer fixed magnet with the rollers suspended on arms from a
> central pivot point 6 each in number.  Joel found that by spacing the
> magnets apart with copper pennies the field effect was enhanced in the
> fixed magnet unit.  Basically it increases the little toroid flux lines
> for there is a little leakage of flux trying to fold back in at each
> little magnet interface (N-S) or junction. This becomes amplified when
> you close the loop by making a continous circle of the little
> "baggles", darnI like Joel's description of these little critters. You
> really need to read all you can on the "Sacred Geometry" to fully
> understand about the energies that are focused within the vesica
> pieces.  Joel is going back and modifying the Phi and Res file for we
> have learned a vast amount of additional knowledge since this file was
> created.   Norm
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11206                                  DATE/TIME: 02/03/95 14:08
> >From   : BERT POOL
> To     : ALL
> Subject: TMI or TOMI
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Well, I went with Norm over to Joel McClain's house last night, and I
> was thoroughly instructed in the proper construction and operation of
> the TMI magnetic propulsion device by Jake - a MOST astute five year
> old!
>   
> The device does exactly what everyone says it will do.  The roller
> wants to roll like hell.  It will roll like hell with ONE row of
> magnets, instead of two.  If you extend the length of the magnets, and
> I did extend it to about 18 inches long, it rolls the whole length, and
> evidences NO intent to slow down or stop.  If I had a couple of rows of
> magnets that went from here in Dallas to California, I have no doubt
> that little sucker would pull itself all the way to Gerald O's house!
> I have some discomfort about a CIRCULAR track, unless it is large in
> diameter, because there is a possibility that placing the magnets at
> the required small angle to form a torus may affect the shape of the
> interacting fields enough between the adjacent magnets to stop it from
> working.  But Norm's prototype will very likely work.  I'm not sure
> the PHI ratio gearing will improve performance, but even without the
> additional rotational speed derived from the planetary gear, it should
> still run.
>   
> I've seen some neat things over the years, but nothing comes close to
> this so far as simplicity and the fact that it moves!
>   
> It moves! ........ it moves up hill.  It damn near leaps in the air!
>   
> It is going to be most interesting to see how far we take this thing.
>   
> Bert
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11227                                  DATE/TIME: 02/03/95 23:58
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN                       -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: Dances with PHI
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Norm,
>   
> Got my order from Am. Sci. & Surplus today...they actually do sell
> things other than coffee mugs.  Included was the "rattleback", or
> "space pet", the ellipsoid that only spins CCW.  If you spin it CW,
> it rattles back and forth, stops spinning CW and spins CCW.  I Know
> that you aren't surprised that the ratio of width to height of this
> device is PHI.  Interesting how this was used in the geometry of
> Noah's Ark.  Also, if you add the width and height together and mul-
> tiply them by Phi, then double the product, you get the exact length,
> so once again it is the Fibronacci series (PHI) and the binary
> series, which is the times two.  Anybody could build an Ark just
> by knowing the PHI ratio, and have a perfectly rock-less boat.
> For some reason, the Celts used the exact same ellipsoidal pattern
> on their knife and axe blades, but then they were primitives.
>   
> Other stuff...the angles of the Great Pyramid are approx. 52 and 38
> degrees, as you know.  The cosine of 52 and the sine of 38 (actually
> the REAL measurements, not these approximations), are both 0.618,
> the inverse of PHI.
>   
> Moray King and Dave Faust sent a fax tonight, with a suggestion for
> using a third coil around the MRA, and feeding the MRA in that manner
> as opposed to directly connecting into the primary.  They tried to
> upload the info as a file but weren't able to...durn 'puters.
>   
> Also, got a few radiac detectors...no particular reason, except they
> were real cheap, so if you want one, it's yours.  BTW did you know
> that the half-life of U238 is 4.5 Billion years?  Picked up that bit
> of comforting info in the Pocket Ref book from A.S.&S.
>   
> C'ya,
> Joel
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11229                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 00:31
> >From   : BILL BEATY
> To     : ALL
> Subject: Bad Griggs News!!!
> Folder : E, "Special Associates Area Omega"
>
> All the internet traffic has made a local Seattle experimenter
> approach me with some unsettling news about Griggs.  This guy
> says that Griggs was involved with Aquatech, the company which
> had the Schaffer patent, that Griggs was sent by Aquatech to
> install their products all over the country, that Griggs split
> off with hostility to start his own company, and that Griggs
> is not an inventor, but just took advantage of systems he was
> working with already.  This guy is Mike Huffman,[email protected].
> He has just entered a patent for his own Schaffer-based device,
> which he has done mainly to keep it from being taken over by
> others.  He is being non-secretive, and is spreading info packets
> around on his device so that others can duplicate it.
> .
> His device is a "cake" of plexi layers having routed channels in
> the form of a slight spiral, which is then spun in a plastic
> close-fitting chamber.  He has just begun testing, and has not
> had the equipment together yet to measure overunity.  THe device
> is a little 8" box connected to a 1/3 HP pump motor, and it boils
> water in a couple of minutes.
> .
> Some good news: he says that Schaffer had a "pull start"
> self-sustaining device working at one time, but Schaffer pulled
> the old secrecy act, never told anyone how it works, and died
> with the secret.
> .
> I told him the story of the Texas inventor with the self-acting
> vegetable oil spiral turbine.  He then told me the Schaffer story,
> and wondered why these people always take it to the grave rather
> than just let loose.  He applauds the MRA efforts.  I haven't
> convinced him to call Keelynet yet, but will soon.
>
> cc: Norman Wootan
>      
> ===============================================================================
>
>
> Message 11231                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 00:58
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : PAUL VISINGER
> Subject: Your MSG # 11198
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Paul,
> and you're welcome!
>   
> Glad the info was helpful, and it's really great to see lots of
> people looking into Stewart Harris' TMI device. It's truly excellent.
>   
> I was most fortunate that Norm got hold of some fine material on
> the 'sacred geometry', and is kindly sharing it with me.  Actually,
> it was Peter Tompkins' book, "Secrets of the Great Pyramid" that
> turned me on to PHI, and the new material goes right into the heart
> of anti-g, ZPE, etc., and it is all PHI related, as is all of nature.
>   
> The term "vesica pices" is what Keely called the "neutral center", it
> just defines it geometrically.  The CBS eye is a vesica pices.  When
> you see it as a PHI proportion, you can connect with the concept in
> a circuit where the fields overlap, or "breathe" into each other at
> their centers.  We can see this happening in the torus fields of the
> circular magnets, and can therefore calculate optimum distance and
> spin ratios using PHI.  That's the 'secret' to the Schauberger
> UFO design...three circles in octave proportion intersecting at
> each other's neutral center...Fibronacci and binary.
>   
> >From a less 'sacred' perspective, the TMI also has a 4.5:1 torque
> ratio, based upon the 1/4" width and 1 1/8" height at 90 degrees
> relative to each other in the TMI.  The easiest thing for the roller
> to do is to roll, and as it does, it intersects more fields per unit
> of time, so it increases in speed at an increasing rate.  It can only
> go so fast before it intersects with half of the magnets on a round
> track, and when this goes over 180 degrees, it should go airborne.
> That's what happened, as you know, with the Searl generator.
>   
> Glad you're actively researching...hit 'em hard.
>   
> Joel
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11234                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 10:12
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: Save the Greys
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> For those who read messages # 11227 and 11231, where Noah's Ark and
> UFOs are equated in terms of their use of the constant phi (í), you
> may be wondering how this could be.  Modern (at least Western) thought
> does not provide the same "maet" concept as was used by the Egyptians
> and others.  The maet is a term which means that one set of principles
> is at work in all things, and that a society can base its direction
> and ideals on these universal constants.
>   
> Because í is how nature chose to "work", anything that is going to
> work within nature should emulate the í proportion to avoid working
> against nature.  That is why all living things use this ratio, and
> why successful free energy devices use resonance.  As seen in the
> file, PHI&RES.ASC, harmony in vibrations is determined by the root
> derivatives of í times frequency.  Harmonies create resonance, and
> overlapping resonances, as Keely demonstrated, cross the zero point.
>   
> Walter Russell and others have been able to intuit the relationship,
> but had they known the pervasiveness of í and used it knowingly, we
> can only imagine how much further they could have gone.  We have that
> opportunity.  It's only math, and really, it's very simple...da Vinci
> and others understood it in our own recorded history.  The problem
> for some is that when you follow the natural progressions, it explains
> too much...it can free mankind in ways that we are only beginning to
> realize, as with the Incunabula and other forms of consciousness
> elevating.  These things are real, and can be accomplished naturally.
>   
> I believe that we are entering the dawn of a whole new era, and that
> whether we are ready or not, we will soon be entering a higher plane
> of existance, including unity consciousness.  It is a natural stage
> in the evolution of the universe, and by understanding the constants
> of the universe, we can simply walk into the light of that new day.
> It is our birthright, denied to us by those who know the maet, but
> who use it to "rule" with.  As with the dinosaurs who once "ruled"
> the earth with fear, these folks are facing extinction.
>   
> I believe that ZPE has not been suppressed as much for the obvious
> reason, as for the reason that understanding it of necessity leads
> to the understanding of all else.  That is why sharing this infor-
> mation is so very important now.  We can do anything that any machine
> can do, and we give up our innate ability every time we use one.
> Technology is a trap...the greys use machines as UFOs, and they are
> now dieing out all over the universe.  We can use our own energies
> to create higher dimensional "UFOs", called merkabas, and free our-
> selves of all need.  We are ready now, and that is why the awareness
> is being given.  We have been, almost literally, asleep, through no
> fault of our own.  We are awakening now, and it's going to be a good
> day.
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11237                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 11:13
> >From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: TMIDEVIC
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Well now that Joel and I convinced Bert that the effect of the Syewart
> Harris TMI is real and has potential of running itself we are off and
> running.  Last night I worked out enough of the geometry of a circular
> device to determine that I need a total of 800 magnets to finalize my
> design of a unit with an outside diameter of 23 inches with 6 rotating
> spokes carrying the runner or rollers. Nothing ventured nothing gained
> as we say. If it does not work we (Bert, Joel and I) will have a lot of
> little novelity toys around to play with <g>. Is there any other use
> for these "crummey" little magnets?  Keep the faith for we know there
> is a way to make this into a workable device.  We all have our own
> ideas so we have to put them into hardware form to test out the theory.
>   It looks good on paper but the proof is in a working device.  Right
> Jerry??  I still want to see Jerry's Hamster Cage TMI work with the
> little magnetic rodent continously rolling along in it like ferris
> wheel ride except the magnetic rodent stays at the bottom of the
> spinning cage. See Jerry, Joel and I have a secret camera hidden in you
> living room.  Ha! Ha!  Just kidding.  Norm  PS: well it is off to the
> Radio Shacks to clean out the remaining stock. Let's see, I have 460
> magnets now so I only have to find 340 more to complete this project.
> ===============================================================================
> essage 11239                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 13:06
> >From   : JOEL MCCLAIN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: The Ark, the laser and the UFO
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Just one other note for now on the "rattleback" or í designed device
> which is the geometry of Noah's Ark.  The longitudinal axis blocks
> laser light by inverting the phase and cancelling it.  In other words
> laser light will not pass through it on the double í dimension.  I've
> tried it, and you can see the cancellation of energy occurring.
>   
> A boat which is built on the same ratios does not rock in the water.
> This has been tested empirically by a group of archaeologists who
> built a small "ark" and found that it would ride over waves without
> any feeling of motion.  The end-to-end energy is cancelled just as
> the laser light is cancelled.
>   
> Put two rattlebacks together and you also have the shape of a
> "classic" UFO.
>   
> Joel
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11243                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 21:37
> >From   : GLENDA STOCKS
> To     : ALL
> Subject: light universe 1/3
> Folder : C, "INSIGHTS/Coincidences/Messages"
>
>   
> 27 Jan 95  01:24:12
> By: Ian Wilson
> To: All
> Re: Universal Vision
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>    
> The Geometry of Light into Matter
>     
> The model is a representation of a vision that I had where I saw
> sub-particles of matter as units of consciousness. The following is
> an overview how the order of this consciousness relates to itself
> and combines to create physical matter and the laws of cause and
> effect.
>      
> The area of thought that this vision contained was relationships in
> numeric unity and geometric form. I am still researching several
> outlets to this form and attempting to articulate as much as I can
> the vision as it creates itself in to logic and unity.
>       
> Keep in mind that this model is a representation and it's a small
> tool to observe relationships in energy and thought as well as it's
> relationship to matter. The nature of this is from the science of
> spirit into the logic of matter so you may find some of the concepts
> not adhering to linear time rather (to) events happening in infinite
> timeless expressiveness.
>        
> A single group or sub-particle is a separated unit from a whole.
> This whole is represented by infinite timeless existance and ties
> into an order of thought that addresses a universal consciousness
> that is self- actualising and expressively harmonious. Light and
> pure thought was the intended model as a representation of this
> universal infinitum. And all aspects of this universe was divided up
> into an infinite number of parts. When these parts descend into
> matter, they transform from light [energy] into physical matter.
> >From there laws are establised creating the structure and physics
> that we form in our science.
>         
> For what ever reasons, the model for the singular personafied unit
> of an infinite order was represented by this following model :
>          
>           
>                  12                This model has 12 sides.
>              11ÚÄÄÄÄ¿1             We add 12 by it's numbers to get 3
>           10   ³    ³  2
>           ÚÄÄÄÄÙ    ÀÄÄÄÄ¿         eg.  12 :  1 + 2 = 3
>          9³              ³ 3
>           ÀÄÄÄÄ¿    ÚÄÄÄÄÙ         We do this to fit it into a feild of
>            8   ³    ³   4          unity
>               7ÀÄÄÄÄÙ5
>                  6
>            
> This singular unit is a part of a greater body of energy. In it's
> material state, it combines with other particles forming
> relationships and bonds. The bonds were represented by a loving,
> harmonious recognition of self and other parts of self. Since this
> energy is light and light has consciousness this unit is self-aware.
> The relationship was called a family and from this family we have a
> molecular order.
>   
> The particles then bond in harmonious order to form larger matter
> based relationship. Keeping in mind that all matter comes from a
> universal field of light energy that has altered it's frequency into
> lower vibrations to form matter. But in it's pure state, it is the
> same: Light. We can take a look at Einsteins theory of relativity
>            2
> where E=MC  This formula represents the relationship of matter and
> light as energy.
>    
> And all this light has consciousness. This key (that) is lacking in
> our science is that energy is consciousness and aware that it
> exists. That it is self aware. And self is what this model is
> representing.
>     
> When light in matter unifies, it forms a relationsip with other
> particles according to laws of relationships between matter and
> light. This becomes a greater whole and we'll form how this order
> creates a larger sub-particle.
>      
> We'll look at four groups of consciousness forming a single particle
> of matter in a relationship. That particle has a unified number and
> it has a relationship; we look at 4 units.
>       
>        
>         
>                  ÚÄÄÄÄ¿            4 units X 12 sides = 48
>                  ³    ³      we add 48 together to unify the number
>        ÚÄÄÄÄÂÄÄÄÄÙ    ÀÄÄÄÄ¿
>        ³    ³              ³       48 :  4 + 8 = 12
>   ÚÄÄÄÄÙ    ÀÄÄÄÄ¿    ÚÄÄÄÄ´
>   ³              ³    ³    ³ And we have 12, which in turn adds to 3.
>   ÀÄÄÄÄ¿    ÚÄÄÄÄÅÄÄÄÄÙ    ÀÄÄÄÄ¿
>        ³    ³    ³              ³
>        ÃÄÄÄÄÙ    ÀÄÄÄÄ¿    ÚÄÄÄÄÙ
>        ³              ³    ³
>        ÀÄÄÄÄ¿    ÚÄÄÄÄÁÄÄÄÄÙ
>             ³    ³
>             ÀÄÄÄÄÙ
>   
> What physical matter reality represents is light at a denser
> vibrational state. Since light is consciousness, it was by thought
> that the light had lowered itself in it's vibration into sub
> particles. And it was this light in it's thoughts that formed
> frequency, matter and fields of energy et al; the laws we strive to
> understand.
>    
> The order comes from attraction and replusion. Since light in a
> matter state creates a resonance of vibration it has a magnetic
> order. Electro-magnetic fields form at various frequencies and this
> identifying order creates the grounds on which matter collects into
> it's schools of particles and families.
>     
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11244                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 21:40
> >From   : GLENDA STOCKS
> To     : ALL
> Subject: light universe 2/3
> Folder : C, "INSIGHTS/Coincidences/Messages"
>
>   
> The Universe as a Whole.
>    
> When addressing any universal concepts we scientifically see the
> universe in terms of light, energy and matter. Energy being neither
> created nor destroyed, just transformed into one stage or another,
> but it is all energy, and the more groups of energy unified in one
> frequency or pattern the more intense and focused the energy
> becomes.
>     
> The universe is intelligent and energy has intelligence. Our
> thoughts are comprised of electrical charges passing through neural
> transmitters in the synapse. This unified balance of patterned
> energy and it's applications give us intelligence, but intelligence
> is still energy.
>      
> The reason we think on a human level is because we have a specific
> frequency of thought energy and it's relationship in it's creative
> design gives the framework for our consciousness and directs or
> controls this intelligence for the purpose of this linear human
> experience. This is commonly noted by brain wave patterns alpha,
> beta, theta, and delta. Controlled frequencies of neural energy
> (Intelligence).
>       
> We are focused particles of energy, matter and light formed in a
> very specific design to comprise the experience we are. And it is
> now very important to start to address thought and it's influence on
> itself. Energy reacts to thought. But we are getting into a series
> of concepts that humanly has been denied or submersed by the
> inability of our thinkers to grasp that their thoughts are an energy
> and are influencing creatively the effects of thought on light as
> electromagnetic brainwave patterns.
>        
> Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. And thoughts do
> create very specific fields of biomagnetic energy in the mind and
> this has an effect much like dropping a pebble into a pond. It is an
> energy, but it is not felt physically rather by electromagnetic
> fields instead of matter fields.
>         
> The universe is connected by both physical bonds and electromagnetic
> bonds. Electromagnetic energy is becoming the science of the soul
> and this is common with such concepts of an AURA which really is a
> biomagnetic field that surrounds the body created by the various
> patterns of electrical impusles caused by thoughts.
>          
> When the mind needs the body to preform a task, it sends a signal to
> a muscle and this muscle reacts with controlled electrical nervous
> responses and thus creates a movement acting upon a denser energy
> stored in as fuel for the cells. Still it's different fields of
> energy preforming very specific tasks. But it is all energy at
> different frequencies.
>           
> This echange creates the biomagnetic aura as energy surges in this
> living machine. And it all starts with thought. And thought is what
> we will examine in some depth and draw upon some areas of thought,
> of applied thought by influencing electromagnetic energy. And this
> gets really interesting.
>   
> Back to the Vision and it's examples.
>    
> The vision then began to illustrate a field of pure white light
> energy as the sum total of all energy existing in the universe in a
> perfect harmonious balanced state of existence. That all parts of
> this energy were at the exact same frequency and order of balance as
> a body, much like an infinite ocean.
>     
> This field was labled the source, source meaning the source of all
> energy and energy being consciousness. So a very intelligent and
> self aware field of energy.
>      
> When this field began to apply thought, parts of it's self began to
> form to those thoughts and this was illustrated as a change of
> frequency and the birth of a new level of energy. This new level of
> energy was the same but different and since it's thoughts were on a
> different field than the first infinite body, this field was more
> focused and represented the first applied thought.
>       
> And in an instant of infinite time, a reaction was formed. Call it
> the big bang, or what ever concept of birth, and energy began to
> lower in frequency and created personifications as this reaction
> caused the entire field of energy to form the structure of the
> universe by an order of applied self-seeking energy.
>        
> This reaction created a number of realities, energy systems and
> physical matter reality was one of many. Physical matter reality was
> the moment when this energy dropped so low in frequency that it
> crystallised and became unified at a series of dense levels.
>         
> Since thought is energy and human thought is energy focused at a
> very human level, we have to understand that there are many fields
> of intelligent energy; all self aware as we are self-aware. We are
> by no means the most intelligent force in the universe. And the
> application of thought causes energy to react and form around that
> thought giving it a dimension to exist in. And depending on the
> frequency of that thought, it will manifest. And I mean it WILL
> manifest, either as a mental formed image to a chain of events that
> gives birth to it in reality. I will go into more depth as I will
> lose so many at this point. So I will clarify this so we can
> understand the principles of this.
>   
> The vision continued to show that these lower particles as they
> dropped in frequency became less aware of the source and more
> submersed into darkness. I saw that the darker it became, the closer
> it came to the physical matter universe until the universe was much
> like the stars in the sky, pin points of energy balanced by a field
> of cause and effect.
>    
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11245                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 21:44
> >From   : GLENDA STOCKS
> To     : ALL
> Subject: light universe 3/3
> Folder : C, "INSIGHTS/Coincidences/Messages"
>
>   
> Why thought as a creative energy?
>    
> It was thought that gave birth to the reaction which created the
> universes. Thought was dynamic and since thought is energy, it
> created a very specific field of energy. And since that feild was
> energy, it also had thought, but a different thought so another
> reaction was formed and we have a chain reaction much like what
> happens in a nuclear bomb when a chain reaction occurs.
>     
> And in all this reaction there were very simple universal laws that
> formed around the relationship of energy and it's self. And we begin
> to get into emotion, love, creation and other mechanisms of
> communication that generate our reality and all realities that exist
> at the different feilds of frequency.
>      
> This now becomes a science of light, and the science of thought.
> Reality is energy, and energy is thought. There is a relationship
> that we have to identify with since this will be a very major
> realisation for most that reality is more energy than it is physical
> but since there are specific laws of cause and effect we find that
> when energy hits another energy feild it creates a specific
> reaction. But it has been and always will be energy and it's
> relationships.
>       
> We exist in a mental universe of crystallised thought energy. Our
> senses are a form of communication devices for translating this
> specific reality and it's order of cause and effect. When we touch
> something, we are sent a message by that "something" that we touch
> according to the relationship of cause and effect. That object tells
> us by feeling that it is, say a ball. A group of focused energy in a
> constructed thought forming a ball in a reality of cause and effect.
> That ball is still energy and energy is thought crystallised at a
> very specific frequency.
>        
> This is a language. We think that our garbled human words are the
> only thing that is communicating with us but we forget that all our
> senses are in fact communicating with very specific frequencies of
> energy. That the whole observed reality is speaking to our senses
> screaming I am BALL! And we feel this ball, taste it, hear it
> bounce, see it's collection of particles. But we do not realise that
> we are from the same creative origin and lack the connection to
> understand that this ball is a energy system that has an awareness
> at a very specific feild.
>   
> I would like to go into detail, but the best advice I can offer is
> eat some rice crispies so that you can have all your senses
> activated by this communication of energy and it's relationship with
> your awareness. And instead of just wolfing it down, be aware that
> your senses are communicating with very specific reactions of energy
> and this dinner is simply communicating to you that this is what it
> is, and you are sharing an exchange of energy with it. And enjoy
> eating it, as all of the sensory input is a language of matter
> reality. And this is what happens when you observe a very specific
> crytallised thought energy. Apply this to all you experience
> physically. And be aware that there is a relationship and a language
> being observed at many differnet levels at once, to create your
> sensory experience with this energy system.
>    
> Can human thought manifest in reality?
>     
> ABSOLUTELY!!!! 100%!!!! We just have a few handicaps to over-come.
> First, we need imagination. We have to believe (and know) that we
> can create something. And then we have to apply that thought. It
> starts with an idea, say the wheel. The wheel was formed first by an
> human idea. And then this human acted upon this energy of thought an
> formed it by the means available to it. And by shaping physical
> reality to a desired thought, a wheel was fashioned by a very human
> hand.
>      
> Then this wheel had a very specific purpose and it spoke to man, and
> man called it wheel. When I say it spoke to him, it was observed by
> senses as a circular object of specific order and design.
>       
> All of our technology today comes from ideas that man has acted upon
> when his desire became so strong that he had to form that thought by
> means of physically hammering it out. They could not have formed if
> thought was not first initiated. That it was thought seeking
> manifestation and building energy, created the events which lead to
> the first wheel being fashioned.
>        
> If we think of something, and begin to add emotion to it, chances
> are we will dream of it if we are active. That the thought formed in
> an electromagnetic reality if you would like. If more energy is
> added to this thought, a person might have an inspiration all of a
> sudden to get off one's bottom and actually fulfill that dreamed of
> idea.
>         
> Thought forms reality, much how we form our technology. Reality was
> a thought before it became crystallised. I will end this portion of
> this discussion as I am rushing to get this out before I get lazy
> and uninspired :) In the next segment we will begin to unlock how
> our thoughts can manifest certain events in reality since there is a
> reaction caused by this. And hence we will talk in some detail on
> thought manifestation.
>   
>                          Till then,
>                                   Ian Wilson
>    
> Ian Wilson               102-197 Roy Ave
> Penticton      B.C.V2A 3M8 Canada
> (604)-493-3455
>     
> This article is still being flushed out, so it is raw material and
> will be revised as I include a lot more of what this area is
> covering. I am just trying to get this out for a few who asked about
> it, but more thought is required before it is fully explained as it
> is.
>      
> Ian Wilson
>       
>   * Origin: Penticton Community Online Media (1:353/115) FidoNet
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11246                                  DATE/TIME: 02/04/95 21:47
> >From   : GLENDA STOCKS
> To     : ALL
> Subject: crystals
> Folder : C, "INSIGHTS/Coincidences/Messages"
>
> Origin: XBN - 0001 - F:I_UFO
>    From: DEBORAH MAYA                  Public
>      To: GLENDA STOCKS
>    Date: 01/28/95 at 05:28
>      Re: CRYSTAL SCIENCE
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> HI!
> This is another page in The 7 Mysteries Of Life: (Guy Murchie)
> Crystal Science:  Piezo, The Crystal of Life (double terminated). The
> sort of crystal that reconcites this paradox of life best of
> all is the rather extraordinary type called piezo, with
> something like a very simple nervous system that makes it
> generate an electric current whenever it is distorted by
> mechanical pressure. The verb " to press" in Greek is piezin so
> it was only logical to name this kind of vital response the
> piezoelectric effect. It occurs because distorting a crystal
> means moving atoms in relation  in one another and, since some
> of them are ions carrying extra electrons, this kind of
> distortion amounts to a flow of electrons which by difinition,
> collectively add up to an electric current. Putting it another
> way as the illustration shows (in book) when a piezoelectric
> crystal unit is not distorted its centers of positive and
> negative electric charge conside and there is no flow of
> current. But the same unit is squeezed into a different shape,
> the charge centers are pushed apart and the current flows as
> long as the centers keep moving. Further more because the
> phenomenon is relative, it works recipiocally-so that, when an
> outside electric current is applied, the charge centers move
> and the crystal contracts or, if connected to an altering
> current, it alternately contracts and expands. In which case of
> course it becomes an oscillator and regulate frequencies in all
> sorts of electronic equipment.  (especially radios and
> communications equipment) Among the better types of crystals
> for piezoelectricity are salt, because its full of ions,
> Quartz, tourmaline, and barium titanate, the last of which has
> become important in radio and TV, microphones, where early this
> century it learned to sing, Transmitters, submarine sonar
> systems, ultrasonic tools and cleaning devices. (Can you
> imagine with natural piez?) Feromagetic crystal with oppositely
> magnetized sublatties so indenpendltly responsive to temperature
> that by warming or cooling it a mere degree of two (as when
> holding it in hand, as I do during a Transmission) it polartity
> can be reversed, making it usefull for storing information in
> computer memory cells. Another bi way jump takes us to the size
> of a lava field containing quartz, such as a large one on North
> Idu peninsula in Japan where an earthquake in November 1930 was
> accompanied by spectacular lightning in a clear sky, a phenoemon
> already becoming well enough recognized to have disseminated
> the theory that piezoelectric crystals subjected to disrupted
> mechanical pressure over many square miles of territory CAN
> GENERATE VOLTAGE SUFFICENT TO CAUSE A THUNDERSTORM. (and a lot
> of WEATHER CONTROL type conditions) In all such widely
> different cases, it seems approprate to cite the increasing
> evidence that in magnetically ordered crystals, the spins of
> the atoms periodically do something that could be called a
> flip, reversing their direction and polarity of Earth, the Sun
> and the Stars and probably the Galaxies. And this change
> actually advances from atom to atom like a roll of falling
> dominoes in a microprogression physicist call a spin (indeed)
> wave that sweeps  through the material like a swell on a ocean.
> It is a vital factor in the melodic reality behind the wave of
> nature of all matter-the still mysterious truth discovered in
> France in 1922 by Louis de Broglie after the merest hint in
> acient ancient times by py l or t pythagoras who had listened
> and listen for and eventually hear, the MUSIC OF THE SPHERES.  ****8
> [...]
> --- FMail 0.92
>   * Origin: Spirit BBS **704-297-5973**Fido#1:3666/701 (1:3666/701)
> ===============================================================================
> Message 11250                                  DATE/TIME: 02/05/95 09:28
> >From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : GLENDA STOCKS
> Subject: TMIDEVIC
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Glenda:  Relay to Stewart Harris that when Joel, Bert and I get the TMI
> device into a self sustaining form that will generate some extra energy
> beyond what it takes to run itself the device will be intoduced to the
> world as "The Harris Effect Generator" (HEG) and not the Searle Effect
> Generator although they are closely related. Stewart's device is really
> a poor boys approach that accomplishes the same results.  "Elegantly
> Simple".  Just want all to know and give credit to the source of the
> knowledge that will make it all possible.  Sure glad you are into the
> "Sacred Geometry" for in it lies all the answers to many questions. I
> am working out the proper geometry of the circular self sustaining
> device as we write and exchange ideas.  To answer your question regards
> the Vesica Pieces pattern all you have to do is clasp both of your
> cupped hands together and visualize the thrust vector that would run
> diagonally through the neutral center of the nested cup formed by your
> hands.  This is the energy vector formed by the intersection of two
> energies coming together in exactly the same strengths and frequencies
> to form the standing wave.  That is the way Joel and I see it but we
> don't have all the answers and this explanation will surfice in our
> minds till someone comes up with concrete proof otherwise.  You know
> all about opinions, everyone has one and I'm sure all will have a
> different answer as to how the TMI really works.  I had fun yesterday
> going around and cleaning out 4 Radio Shack Store of their loose magnet
> stock.  The Managers would ask me what I needed so many of these
> magnets for.  I would say "Just ring up my purchase then I will tell
> you".  After the sale was complete I would draw out the TMI and explain
> to which the Manager would say, "darn it, you just bought all my
> magnets so I will have to order more before I can build my own TMI.
> The Tandy Wharehouse Computer is going nuts with this demand curve and
> the reorder quantities are going out the roof.  I can see a night shift
> working at the Tandy Magnet Plant at Ft. Worth.  Ha! Ha!  Will keep you
> all informed as to progress on the "HEG".  Norm
>
>
>
> Message 11255                                  DATE/TIME: 02/05/95 12:35
> >From   : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP)               -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: (R) TMIDEVIC
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Norm!  The hamster cage model was one Stewart and I both discussed
> but I had designed one that is basically the current linear model on
> edge.....there are several people who have written, called or emailed
> they are doing essentially the same thing....to have one single closed
> loop that propels the magnet continually is the secret and one that has
> been missed for so many years....I am told there was a device of this
> nature over 40 years ago that ran continuously....and after a couple of
> years of so, everything became magnetic and the device stopped....the
> inventor then simply replaced the magnets and it resumed...
> ...
> One other thing, do you remember the Hummel flying disk???  The
> cylindrical magnetic suspension chamber uses the same continuous
> forward thrust that had me going so bad on the way back and resulted in
> that feeble attempt with the two black disks with all the little
> magnets glued onto it.....
> ...
> It would have worked had they been attached as Stewart Harris had done to
> take advantage of the 'magnetic instability'....since 1978, he has had
> this information and been trying to get it out in one form or another,
> now it's hit and will lead to phenomenal things....IT INDEED WORKS...
> ...
> Just got a call from Dan, after we talked last night, he rigged up the
> magnets and was just laughing his head off at how it worked just as
> described and dammit, after all these years, the principle (one of them)
> is SO SIMPLE a child could do it.....anyway, he is placing an order
> with AZ for hundreds of magnets to develop a circular track...
> ...
> It will be fun to watch this next year as the newsletters, conferences
> and indeed THE MEDIA become aware and focussed on this principle...I
> have sent out packages to all the contacts, TESLA, ESJ, BORDERLAND,
> NEN, SEA, KING, BEARDEN, ETC....so they will be aware of what is going
> on with the full details....it will simply expand now way beyond
> this.....I just want Stewart to get his full due as the DISCOVERER of
> the effect, not that others have not done it, but that Stewart first
> RELEASED it for others to understand.....PHANTASTIC!!!......>>>  Jerry
> ===============================================================================
>
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11272                                  DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 08:08
> >From   : BOB PADDOCK                        -- RECEIVED -- 
> To     : JOEL MCCLAIN
> Subject: (R) TMI Plans
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
>   JM>
>   JM> For those who may be interested in building a TMIDEVIC, here are
>   JM> the measurements off mine, and it works, so it is a place to start.
>   JM>
>   [snip]
>   JM>
>   JM> Put together ten magnets.  They hold together pretty well as a
> result
>   JM> of their attractions, but you may want to smoothly tape around them
>   JM> anyway.  This is the "runner".  The magnet stacks along the sides
> of
>   JM> the "up ramps" have a penny in between each adjacent magnet, so you
>   JM> will want to tape around each stack.  Make these stacks, and set
> them
>   JM> aside.  Cut and prefold the cardboard.  Next, you will tape the
> side
>   JM> stacks to the top of the cardboard "up ramps".
>   |
>   |      This reminded me of some thing, so I want and pulled
>   | my "Magnet File" (Need to look in my files more often
>   | things in there I didn't remember having, see near end):
>   |
>   |      From Science & Mechanics Magazine, Spring 1980,
>   | "Amazing Magnet-Powred Motor" by Jorma Hyypia.
>   |
>   |      On page 46: "In the assembly at right the vehicle is
>   | propelled, in either direction, by the force of the large
>   | magnets arranged below tracks."
>   |
>   |      On page 47: is a Gauss plot:  "... plots of
>   | experimental data showing the dramatically different
>   | magnetic effects at the north and south poles of armature
>   | magnet.  These are "STEEPED" [Emphasis mine] readings made
>   | over the stator magnets and spaces between them.  If the
>   | magnetic flux patterns are plotted on a continuous basis as
>   | the armature moves along the stator track, the result is a
>   | "sinousoidal" graph.  .... showing complex magnetic forces
>   | interacting to create off-balance effects that move the
>   | armature from right to left..."   This plot looks like your
>   | corrugated cardboard.
>   |
>   |      [Next plan a trip trip to Toys'R'Us ....]
>   |
>   |      "A transparent plastic sheet atop this magnet
>   | assembly supports a length of plastic model rail-road track.
>   | The vehicle, basically a model railroad flatcar, supports a
>   | foil-wrapped pair of curved magnets, plus some sort of
>   | weight, in some cases merely a rock.  The weight is needed
>   | to keep the vehicle down on the track, against the powerful
>   | magnetic forces that would otherwise push it askew....
>   |
>   |      "...I was prepared to develop eye strain in an
>   | effort to detect some sort of motion in the vehicle. ... The
>   | moment the inventor let go of the vehicle he carefully
>   | placed at one end of the track, it accelerated and literally
>   | **ZIPPED** from one end to the other onto the floor!
>   | **Wow**!"
>   |
>   |      "Knowing that I would be asked if the track might
>   | have had a slant, I reversed the vehicle and started it from
>   | the opposite end of the track.  It worked just as effectively
>   | in the reverse direction.  In fact, the vehicle can even
>   | navigate a respectable up-grade."
>   |
>   |      Also see patent "4,151,431 4/24/1979 Permanent
>   | Magnet Motor" by Howard R. Johnson.  Note that the graph "biassing
>   | magnetic field" on the first page is from some other patent,
>   | but I don't know which one.  Also this patent is for a
>   | rotatory thing not the linear thing described above.  It was
>   | the linear model demonstrated, but the a rotary thing that
>   | was patented.  Also there has been some questions over the
>   | years if some of the article was true or not.
>   |
>   |      Don't over look neat things you can do with magnetic
>   | 'craft' tape.  You can get 20 foot rolls at any 'craft
>   | store', didn't you every wonder how all of those things got
>   | stuck to the front of the refiduator????
>   |
>   |      There is also the work of Bill Muller (2/29/1984).
>   |
>   |      Picture a "Lazy Susan" on the moving part are
>   | intermixed magnets and iron blocks spaced every 22.5 degrees
>   | (center to center).  On the outside (non moving part) are
>   | larger magnets/blocks spaced every 24 degrees (center to
>   | center).  I know this is vague, but I can't read most of the
>   | details from this crummy copy.  It was reported to work, but
>   | be slow and jerky, with little torque.
>   |
>   |
>   |      As for the part about my bad memory, I have a copy
>   | of "Perpetual Motion Journal", March 1969, Volume I, Number
>   | 4.  Any one know if these people are still around?  One
>   | thing I can say is that the quality of the coping machines
>   | was a lot better back then than now, I can count the number
>   | of turns on the coils...
>   |
>   |      Any way it covers these patens:
>   |
>   |      #1,835,721 for a permanent magnet motor by Arthur
>   | Powell.
>   |
>   |      #1,963,213 for a magnetic motor was issued to J.W.
>   | Poysa, 6/19/1934.
>   |
>   |      #1,859,643, 5/24/1932, by Mr. Harry L. Worthington.
>   |
>   |      #1,859,764, May 24, 1932 by Geroge H. Bougon.  This
>   | one closely resembles what you have described.
>   |
>   |      Also in the March 1879  (yes 18) issue of Harper's
>   | Magazine, reprinted in "The Theosophist" for November 1879,
>   | is reported to be a drawings of a working motor, any one got
>   | these laying around?
>   |
>   |      And from NASA we have "A Linear Magnetic Motor and
>   | Generator: A device that can be used as a bidirectional
>   | motor or AC generator", GSC-12518.  [Nothing self sustaining
>   | with this one tho.  I've noticed some thing about this NASA
>   | stuff, any one of these things alone is not particularly
>   | exciting.  But I've amassed a large collection of them, the
>   | sum of the whole is more than its components, there is a
>   | clear pattern of 'Free Energy' stuff emerging under
>   | the guise of "Space Operation".]
>   |
>   |   "There is nothing new under the sun.  See this is new."
>   |
> ===============================================================================
> ===============================================================================
>
> Message 11268                                  DATE/TIME: 02/06/95 07:17
> >From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
> To     : ALL
> Subject: Inter-Atomic Resonance
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> For a long time I have been struggling with an idea or theory which I
> will share with everyone now and will write up for Jerry as a file if
> he wants to post it.  It goes like this: In 1892 Nikola Tesla created
> electrostatic discharges from an induction coil that possesed every
> characteristic of what we commonly know as a chemical decomposition
> flame and posed the question to the scientific world; "Is a chemical
> flame simply a release of atomic electrostatic rewsonances during
> transition between states of matter?"  My Cold Fusion Patent search was
> based on the theory that since electrostatic forces are the "glue" or
> binding force which holds all mater together then if we use resonant
> standing waves (scalar effect) then we could disassemble the atomic
> structure which is what Tesla had proposed during his Lecture before
> the Electrical Engineering Conference in London when de discribed his
> carbon button lamp experiments. My theory explains the dissosation
> process in the electrolytic cell when we separate hydrogen and oxygen
> from water. It is the inter-atomic resonances that cause the
> disassociation of the hydrogen from the oxygen in the simple
> electroylisis of water.  The normally strong molecular bond of the H2O
> molecule is broken by the difference in resonant frequencies of
> hydrogen and oxygen which are excited by the flow of electric current.
> When hydrogen is oxidized by oxygen (combustion) the results, water and
> a release of energy which we perceive as heat and light is actually a
> broad band of electrostatic resonances. This conforms with Tesla's
> observations. Since the electromagnetic spectrum goes from "0"HZ or DC
> all the way up to Cosmic Rays and who knows how much higher (infinity)
> with no differentation or categories of energy then why can't all
> frequencies be electrostatic resonances. When we feel heat we say  that
> is "heat" but it is actually and electrostatic resonance that we
> perceive as heat and if the frequency is high enough it becomes visible
> red or even higher freq it becomes white light if the resonances are
> broad band to encompass enough frequenciesa
> More later on this subject for Jerry does not want files in the message
> base.  Think about this one.  Norm
> ===============================================================================
>
> To all, as you can see that all of this TMIDEVIC activity occured during the whole MRA slug fest, both Joel and I were pretty busy juggling the balls in the circus. Lol
>
> On 2/17/2019 2:28 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Hi Norm,
>>
>> Can you tell us more about this device Joel commented "this dog will 
>> warp"
>>
>> Sounds like some kind of Searle device possibly without the 
>> individual rollers.  Perhaps similar to my concept of polarization 
>> bias via spin locking along with magnetic lenzing.
>>
>> Interesting how ferromagnetic materials are so easy to achieve 
>> molecular alignment.
>>
>> When studying the MRA did you determine to what alignment 
>> relationship the piezo had with the E field, if it was perpendicular 
>> again as the E to B and in what direction of rotation?
>> Assuming the insect flight may also have something to do with piezo 
>> electric mode...
>>
>> Wonder which way one would have to align to allow for transparency to 
>> visible light...
>>
>> On 2/16/2019 5:39 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The vortex phenomenon is everywhere.
>>>
>>> ===============================================================================
>>>
>>> Message 11108 DATE/TIME: 02/01/95 07:13
>>> From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
>>> To     : GLENDA STOCKS
>>> Subject: TMIDEVIC
>>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>>
>>> Glenda:  Several things have transpired over the last week on the net
>>> that had me really "puzzled" then I realized what was occuring. See I
>>> work everyday like most people and come home in the evenings and catch
>>> up on the messages on the Keely-Net. Since Joel and I are partners and
>>> share all data and information that we fall heir to I have a habbit of
>>> calling Joel and discussing all the details as to what has been posted
>>> to the Net during the course of the day.  Since Joel works out of his
>>> home he is responding during the day to messages and posting results of
>>> our discussions and project progress.  What became obvious to me was
>>> that I had become a "transparent" party to the action.  What made me
>>> realize this was a comment made by someone (I never forget little
>>> comments) that Joel had more info on the "hydrosonic pump".  The
>>> hydrosonic pump research was a project that I started back last summer
>>> and Joel got interested in the strange phenomenon that I reported on
>>> the Net.  As a result of these experiments that we jointly conducted we
>>> became "attached at the brain", Ha! hA!. I promise that I'll try to
>>> post thoughts and ideas on the board in the future instead of just
>>> calling Joel this way you guys and gals will see both sides of the
>>> conversation instead of just one side.  What I am saying is that Joel
>>> and I have both been involved in a "crash course" on "Sacred Geometry"
>>> so that we can see how all these things work in nature.  On the TMI
>>> device Joel and I have worked out a full sustaining method of making
>>> the TMI not only run itself continously but generate power in the
>>> process and if you so desire take "flight" just like the Searle Disk.
>>> Last night I went out to Joel's and we had a long visit during which we
>>> worked outr a lot of the details as to how the device actually worked
>>> and how it related to the Searle rollers.  After I got back home I ran
>>> several test on the magnet runner for I was interested in the
>>> relationship between the fixed track portions and the rotating magnetic
>>> runner or roller. The interesting phenomenon here is that the runner
>>> has to be rotating or the device will not provide the necessary thrust
>>> to continue to move.  One very interesting point that Stewart mentioned
>>> was that he used the "tinker toy" wheels to slow down the roller. Well
>>> what I did was increase the spin rate of the roller or runner by the
>>> Phi rate in relation to the fixed magnetic track and found that the
>>> intersecting vesica pieces vortex paterns were multiplied to the extent
>>> that this thing has incredible thrust and does not need the broken
>>> segments in the track as per the original plans. The track can be a
>>> continous vortical or helixal magnetic flow with the runner magnetic
>>> vortex intersecting at 90 degrees to provide 3D nested visica pieces
>>> vortices.  Very interesting little device which as Joel properly put
>>> it, "This dog will WARP".  A very true statement for what you will have
>>> created is a very simplified version of John Searle's SEG. For you non
>>> indoctrinated out there that means Searle Effect Generator. This thing
>>> properly constructed will not only run itself but generate plenty of
>>> excess power in the process.  The biggest problem you are faced is that
>>> if you ever lose the laod on it you will have the same problem that
>>> John Searle had in that your home powering generator will simply
>>> accelerate to the critical velocity of the rollers and simply fly away
>>> leaving a hole in your roof.  All kind of possibilities here. Thanks
>>> for sharing this little device with the world. Everyone will have fun
>>> with this one.  Norm
>>> ===============================================================================
>>>
>>> On 2/16/2019 7:32 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>> > 
>>> =============================================================================== 
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Message 11109                                  DATE/TIME: 02/01/95 
>>> 07:46
>>> > From   : NORMAN WOOTAN
>>> > To     : BERT POOL
>>> > Subject: MIT report
>>> > Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>> >
>>> > Bert:  Great report you posted yesterday. I need to go back to the
>>> > Hydrosonic Pump testing that Joel and I did and write up our findings
>>> > so those guys will have a better understanding as to what is going on
>>> > in the Griggs and Perkins type pumps. They are off track by believing
>>> > that the pitting effect on the rotor is caused by heat. joel and I 
>>> have
>>> > already determined that the whole anomolous heating effect is an
>>> > electrical phenomenon which we proved by building the pump unit with a
>>> > transparent outer tube so we could study the cadeuses helix standing
>>> > wave patterns which were composed of millions of very tiny bubbles in
>>> > the shape of little tornadoes in the form of an "S" shape. The
>>> > electrical effect is obvious by the presence of a very strong magnetic
>>> > field around the rotor in the form of a magnetic monopole.  I'm am
>>> > surprised that Gene Mallove did not tell Griggs about our research fro
>>> > I sent him a complete package on our testing of the Perkins Pump unit
>>> > along with the MRA info. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.  Norm
>>> > 
>>> =============================================================================== 
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 2/16/2019 7:29 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>> >> Moray King,  please note.
>>> >>
>>> >> 
>>> =============================================================================== 
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Message 11075                                  DATE/TIME: 
>>> 01/31/95 09:40
>>> >> From   : BERT POOL                          -- RECEIVED --
>>> >> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
>>> >> Subject: Griggs, C.F., motors, etc., cont.
>>> >> Folder : D, "Special Associates Area Alpha"
>>> >>
>>> >> Norm, here's the good stuff!
>>> >> Message #800 - Fidonet - Science
>>> >>    Date: 01-23-95 23:55:14
>>> >>    From: Michael Fullerton
>>> >>      To: All
>>> >> Subject: Cold Fusion Day at MIT
>>> >> Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
>>> >> From: [email protected] (Eugene Mallove)
>>> >> Subject: Brief Report on MIT IAP Cold Fusion Day
>>> >> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1995 13:50:03 GMT
>>> >> Lines: 139
>>> >> [
>>> >> *Brief* Memo on IAP Cold Fusion Day at MIT by Eugene F. Mallove,
>>> >>    Sc.D., meeting organizer
>>> >> [
>>> >> The Cold Fusion Day IAP meeting at MIT on Saturday, January 21, which
>>> >> I organized, was in my view, a spectacular success. About 150
>>> >> attendees in rapt attention for about 10 hours in the main Physics
>>> >> Lecture Hall (Room 6-120). Several high points came at the end of the
>>> >> day:
>>> >> (A) Jim Griggs of Hydrodynamics, Inc. (Rome, Georgia) gave a
>>> >> magnificent presentation with new data on *massive melting* that has
>>> >> occurred on the periphery of his Hydrosonic Pump aluminum rotors on
>>> >> several occasions. He also described re-welding of melted material to
>>> >> the rotor surface -- an even higher-temperature effect, he said. He
>>> >> had one such rotor unit there and you could see and feel it.
>>> >> Fantastically high temerpatures would be required to do that and this
>>> >> is NOT ordinary cavitation. Among other observations, if it were
>>> >> simple cavitation, why would that not occur as a regular feature of
>>> >> Hydrosonic Pump operation? -- it does not. Cavitation experts at
>>> >> Georgia Inst. of Technology have now become involved. They say it is
>>> >> NOT cavitaiton. Griggs presented some stunning photomicrographs.
>>> >> Meanwhile, the over-unity effect continues to be seen, even as Griggs
>>> >> continues to sell in recent months several hundred thousand dollars
>>> >> worth of Hydrosonic Pumps for standard applications up to 250 HP.
>>> >> (B) Bert Werjefelt from PolyTech(USA) in Hawaii spoke about his work
>>> >> on magnetic motors and the theory behind them. He reported that
>>> >> experiments have seen output powers of 450 watts electric, with only
>>> >> 150 watts electric going in. Attempts at self-sustaining have been
>>> >> successfull for periods of minutes. The company now thinks it knows
>>> >> how to make a self-sustainer continue indefinitely and is 
>>> building one
>>> >> right now, expected to be ready in the next month or two. He showed
>>> >> gorgeous CAD diagrams of the 100-200 watt self-sustainer now under
>>> >> construction in Hawaii. He explained how it worked (the precise
>>> >> balancing of repulsion and attraction systems to substantially reduce
>>> >> torque). It was obvious that many if not most in the audience 
>>> accepted
>>> >> his apparently very solid experimental conclusions -- even *some* I
>>> >> would have thought would have left in disgust. Werjefelt put 
>>> forth his
>>> >> theoretical ideas, which are based, in part, on suggestions made by
>>> >> several (now) Nobel laureate physicists in the 1950s regarding 
>>> nuclear
>>> >> magnetic spin systems (Pound, Purcell, and Ramsey). Others in the
>>> >> audience were extremely excited by this report, and put forth their
>>> >> theoretical ideas. Werjefelt is a solid mechanical engineer, whose
>>> >> company manufactures pioneering FAA-certified safetly equipment. 
>>> He is
>>> >> deeply involved in aviation safety issues and would have much
>>> >> credibility to lose if he were not on absolutely solid ground with
>>> >> this magnetic energy technology. He has been working quietly in this
>>> >> field for about ten years. On the advice of his patent attorneys, he
>>> >> published his general ideas in an article titled, "Magnetic Battery,"
>>> >> in that countner-scientific culture journal, "Extraordinary Science"
>>> >> (Telsa Society), May/June/July 1993, which is availbale in places 
>>> like
>>> >> Barnes& Nobel book stores. Don't let your prejudices about the Tesla
>>> >> Society fool you, this is a very carefully crafted scientific article
>>> >> with some excellent possible avenues to explain concrete experimental
>>> >> results.
>>> >> The 8-minute video tape of the Japanese developments in this area of
>>> >> "Dream Energy" (Magnetic Energy)  was shown. This had aired on 
>>> FUJI TV
>>> >> in Japan on October 20, 1993. There are four major coporations
>>> >> involved under MITI aegis: Sumitomo, Hitachi, Mitsubishi, and
>>> >> Matsushita. Werjefelt's company appears to have a very strong patent
>>> >> position in his area, however. The chief engineer of the Aerospace
>>> >> Division of Sumitomo has visited Werjefelt and told him that this
>>> >> discovery is "the greatest discovery of the 20th century."
>>> >> Gene Mallove, who has been working with others who are getting
>>> >> similar, related results with smaller units,  will co-author a paper
>>> >> with Bert Werjefelt that will be presented at the Fifth International
>>> >> Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF5) in Monte Carlo, Monaco (April 9-13,
>>> >> 1995). This paper will present both experimental evidence and a
>>> >> suggested theoretical framework. It is expected that several working
>>> >> self-sustaining units will be brought to ICCF5. There is a possible
>>> >> (likely!) connection with cold fusion thermal effects that have been
>>> >> seen.
>>> >> The MIT IAP proceedings of 1/21/95 were professionally videotaped. A
>>> >> sligthly edited full-version of the day-long program ( 8-10 hours)
>>> >> will be distributed by Cold Fusion Technology. Also, a shorter 
>>> version
>>> >> summary (less than two hours) will be be prepared by Mallove, working
>>> >> with a video production corporation in Manchester, NH. Due to 
>>> schedule
>>> >> overload, it may be another 4 weeks before the tapes are available..
>>> >> Every effort will be made to accelerate the process. A transcribed
>>> >> version of some of the talks is also being planned by Cold Fusion
>>> >> Technology.
>>> >> This is only the "tip of the iceberg" of the incredible events at MIT
>>> >> Cold Fusion Day. In retrospect, this was an extremely historic
>>> >> meeting. It was the first time that present and imminent
>>> >> commercial-level power production from cold fusion/free energy was
>>> >> discussed in a completely scientific manner at a major 
>>> university. The
>>> >> message was apparently very well received. Mallove received numerous
>>> >> compliments on the decorum and solidity of the sessions.
>>> >> The former editors of "Cold Fusion" Magazine have joined forces and
>>> >> put out an interim "Cold Fusion/New Energy Technology" (CFNET) 
>>> Update,
>>> >> a 36 page compendium -- mostly on cold fusion. This was distributed
>>> >> free of charge to attendees at the MIT IAP meeting. Others wanting
>>> >> this document should send a nominal $5.00 to Cold Fusion 
>>> Technology to
>>> >> obtain a copy for themselves:
>>> >> Cold Fusion Technology, Box 2816, Concord, NH 03302-2816 USA
>>> >> Fax: 603-224-5975, Phone: 603-228-4516
>>> >> This CFNET Update is a precursor to the continuation of a 
>>> **reliable**
>>> >> Cold Fusion/New Energy Technology magazine (title yet to be
>>> >> finalized).
>>> >> ****A recent posting by Victor Lapuszynski of "Cold Fusion" at WGI
>>> >> contained an egregious error: Piantelli has NOT seen "50 *MeV*
>>> >> gammas"! He has observed 50 KeV gammas, and will be publishing a 
>>> paper
>>> >> soon. And so there is absolutely NO CONFUSION here: There is no 
>>> longer
>>> >> any connection whatsoever between Wayne Green's "Cold Fusion"
>>> >> newsletter and Cold Fusion Technology in Concord, New Hampshire. An
>>> >> indication of the "quality" of the present editorial direction at
>>> >> "Cold Fusion" at WGI: Mr. Lapuszynski left the sessions after 
>>> repeated
>>> >> announcements that two extremely important presentations on
>>> >> experiments were to be made.]****
>>> >> National Public Radio aired a one-hour cold fusion program (1/20/95)
>>> >> the day before the MIT IAP program, as part of the Ira Flatow 
>>> "Science
>>> >> Friday" show. Featued for the "pro" side were Dr. Edmund Storms,
>>> >> formerly of Los Alamos National Laboratory and Dr. Eugene Mallove of
>>> >> Cold Fusion Technology, who gave a brief overview of what the next
>>> >> day's MIT Cold Fusion program would be about. Also on air were two
>>> >> members of the "Flat Earth Society" -- Gary Taubes, author of "Bad
>>> >> Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion" and Professor
>>> >> David Goodstein of Caltech, neither of whom obviously knew what they
>>> >> were talking about in the matter of cold fusion. Neither have been
>>> >> seen at any cold fusion conferences in recent years, but that did not
>>> >> stop them from calling cold fusion research "lousy science." Both
>>> >> managed to record themselves for posterity as the pontificating,
>>> >> ignorant naysayers that they are -- at this, the 11th hour and 59th
>>> >> minute of the Fossil Fuel Era, at the dawn of the New Energy Age. A
>>> >> copy of this tape can be obtained from National Public Radio in
>>> >> Washington.
>>> >> Sincerely, Eugene F. Mallove, Sc.D., Cold Fusion Technology,
>>> >> P.O. Box 2816, Concord, NH 03302-2816, Fax: 603-224-5975,
>>> >> Phone: 603-228-4516
>>> >> >> Good stuff, no?      Bert
>>> >> 
>>> =============================================================================== 
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 19939 invoked by uid 102); 18 Feb 2019 14:53:49 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq5.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.198.29.78) by m6.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2019 14:53:49 -0000
X-Received (qmail 13923 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2019 14:53:49 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.194.219) by mtaq5.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2019 14:53:49 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-YMailISG lt1IHF0WLDuhkF2f.Z6FOvMLCWszUS0REDQxxcCF1A.Gg41C zmPgfIJe3F4YOgb7D0WCu1kIeCA8c7Til6f2QF6v6vxJjKI11TjC1SGxn_73 gYUYgym_rlfYNGxJq478UhVGDSZbYgGlvQgZJ7lxJVKj5MGptfgEnktU0vqE oGVeJuN_wQT73pUx7RmVUhzHY3tcnlR39sboOT.GCg5UjQR0tIo3MKqyK9m2 uO55OsSP5ZHJxhdr2477KsF1kHW9_kpl69ZTD_iAjehViL2skjS.Jk2.1hg. DZVyt6lNRoG712BJo2x3AtsLzSpCYKxOFKWsppu7WeA6wUj8xN8Jbp.hn5es OlA14A15AIjg_arRSFB13pa9FHp.kv34.U5kuZcE0eMOyAF4xyNah2wxe9YK wT7hFp2CmsfoE4pMRCPzRyAIlhITVgLDdMXyoxlgcRSOhG5skr9JUYqtlBI1 vDmp0XSnEK84L4v7ObkrddWEyWbYt0O9JaIEm1LEYDPppa9nEm10TrbZYiM2 2W2YoiOs5aIPGRS2GqcLsyqn.cXJPWTdsRweh1bk2H6lkWSHRHo3OgSggbq3 fQiUD.aeNiFiP8hc8XN99Snj1.vCWcP6D5y9Z1RGazB_1qFZuy60a9dCyRZC dAOY.bpAIBX1Si717z1xcx72KOWoxQbNpQPh1Snl586QuENzXAGRumcYvI5B 1itksW6eH82g79GsQlQWzuwCHlCctbgV3HEvzJuxedbx2xW7z2N9ER2BiSXX 8z0E6_MTsgiN4GBSqT3PCRef5FF54F6hJjnFRCbGCoryoJc8niFQ1Dxlqylw lrdEBMMuVWn0xnVvu2ebeiteDEftt3_0GVs1uYnkl1SVzAgxiucKzs_6Jg5h 9njT5AlBCPaV1q88zsFPo9iK.vuR8kjVtQJ67qbNn6l66a1UogdMZz_cPKjM 4LAXm93V2Bd9_dR_Ujp5lftdiDg80mEDk2AouwasHEL0PDXefcHJ6WRIEOhu 7_QVEQmaojqLez4bnbiSFJEZNY669wptU88eyx3yiCBIzlyx29bduyeFrvBJ Api2Ot7pB7fjpfnWirjqzKjW9nd4TpGsWYAIQQjUoKnWzEDSpoeB6vW9kZhb fT7MqNyylGlV4QlJHnPuJRBc9konoivu4hGKrCRyr5JXbnqCB6_KvN3x9_Yw i3u.0XUDIPN4_nfGLQfL5Fq7ANBViP.IHMQOT2k_cMLy4BvqiG_22rszw.7N W4wYb8wLiMcHA6YcvnU-
Authentication-Results mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [email protected]; header.s=s1024; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic302-6.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com) (74.6.135.45) by mta4001.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:53:48 +0000
X-YMail-OSG eJS0XN0VM1neD9D0ExN7GerHlfPXfv2rSva2.fdE6itCDLS74WQIRnsxqpO4K18 iiVJqbxXKJg0vLMgk8zE64cgPJ5PzsfpIedbIRtJw_9rtZZAffyZXzCn8VrKM.V5ybKGShew.kJj rt_4q1NkH9dqDbUXGuGG9qR_8fi9c5RmjfYfNG166JzMkldqhuRfGN0VIUjm88a.aMcddv_YQxcw QPXxb8I6mr6vhozRXREx_.b41WhhvI4Q0196oAc9PcPRXtHNrx0GTs5HqG1B_QMHImsMlXPhOkob .BCPz0O3BYKnulCTiFiRPfMhlk4T.MN5VMrfI.d5u.NlrBNytuxxmQsbC7KF16MQdLSJNY8Ab8qH .A3gpJEpX.w41xIItSWYnceJb4PKedfXfdroIalfmHf8Tggn9yC.a0S2dOKvVPBbfUm_ElRp4naC uSldlSpnumwKSHUfTsiQaGSAu17rzyFiwY9gkvD5o1BaDrgqbJECbVpqeNdrmFXTiP1kLNWCD2vJ zb6882Upaep4G.MKJW96A_4iqa88t5yFHcWm8iKX3nI3YYzbgrThL19yNbpnRidG8cpU_xWJa6Ee 5GQx1fcOTGBbh0x_6aTG3B5JTzgajoh9_9_tsrIxB3W8ZaLMO5lAP6kmfOM9hjrqh_ySCNx3egle trmwaaG6PU1fU16yGoTyZs_8neMo0UjRwZIFVBLXFoQkWgc8c2HYjUg5ZeVaXWEzEC0S_TLzQKNQ o0Edbw4ik9Lg1Z2wboW73NNOWAgc28YIDaQzIhDEwFc45OnddccqmEVQpsaW_WcMX3IeR12J9W93 8MxUFx8H09EjzSCEV8LjgzNiQYz2i0XI0dsb7Q3b1_.6vpUuPuz7ttbMi3DNiCpMaf_f7qcbaAGU gUZeeEYivLeflk2xP1iFPMi57DxPmWOC7K4x1t55pw6knb52V4IdQwBlnFgBXZVFr0hmNrtdRjsh o2nItm_KowFPcvU2i.kh2bu_Py5.2dobsaQlhMIIRxRYz5JtqX4mZeeQnZTUvxMn4tVgVX1MyX47 KMDsJi1zFWobGVFfFvjYUnOBXWD5xhZPef3UIu.LfoeGlAFsCPdYqh0a_lxeeAeKrcw--
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic302.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:53:48 +0000
X-Received from ip70-189-27-193.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.5]) ([70.189.27.193]) by smtp407.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID f45629a4f0a9ba51243f874b5058bd1f; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
To [email protected], Art Devine <[email protected]>, Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Steven Elswick <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Angel Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]>
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:53:42 -0600
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4BD7AF3ABF7F24935473E072"
Content-Language en-US
X-Originating-IP 10.201.194.219
Subject Knowledge of the Ancients, Sacred Geometry
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=554418533; y=spxXuHiRod1NeNpuHOANbSrYkItl9EfohZ7AgzyqEKQ2E0p-43_CMVdH
X-Yahoo-Profile [email protected]
From Norman Wootan <[email protected]>