Body
Warren, Interesting that you brought up the subject of photo lithography
for chips, since back in 1981, I was designing driver circuits for a new
class of DC motors and got to be friends with the Engineers at Texas
Instruments Dallas. I got a complete tour of their facilities and was
really impressed with the photo lithography lab. They had a wall very
long and high with the intricate details drafted of a single integrated
circuit chip. Photo reduction of the super high resolution image put the
whole wall of circuitry on a chip about 1/4" X 1/4" in size. The vacuum
deposition of the various elements in the chip building process was
fascinating.
Now if we could do the same thing with the bug wing geometry that
creates the micro vortex pairs, then we could duplicate the supposed
effect. Would provide experimental proof of validity. A good 3D
printer would suffice.
On 2/11/2019 10:14 AM, Mick [email protected] [] wrote:
>
> Warren,
>
> Great idea! As you say it's now called 3d printing. The best system
> uses the equivalent of a plasma torch to assemble from metal powders.
> One can specify stainless or titanium or whatever.
> http://www.arcam.com/
>
> The good old days of photo lithography for chips are difficult to
> replicate. The setups now are so expensive they have to amortize the
> systems bigtime, so it's not just the golf playing suits to blame it
> on. We are down around 10nm fab now and for Intel to setup a new Fab
> cost about a billion dollars. Keep in mind these are fully automated
> chip assembly lines not one offs. Technology is changing so fast they
> don't have time to use the old buildings just mothball the whole last
> system building and all or lose out. AMD has gone fabless and just
> bids out the best silicon forge at the time. Now that the concept is
> perfected there is not much of the small lithography stuff around
> anymore.
>
> I am sure the old machinery can be had for the cost of hauling it away
> if it can be located.
>
> It always helps to know someone. I think Chuck Moore the Originator
> of Fourth language (the most efficient high level language) designed a
> system to build one offs and skip one of the expensive steps involved
> in forging a chip. That's funny you were able to play with substrate
> that could be band saw cut, how things change!
>
> On 2/11/2019 6:44 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Norm
>>
>> Some number of years ago when working as director of research
>> for a research and development project for a medical company,
>> I had to come up with a way to make extremely tiny shapes, much like
>> your vortex problems.
>> The technology at the time for making logic chips, could be used.
>> Layers of various deposits, the shapes generated photographically at
>> that time, from artwork, of course, scaled down, were able to be
>> deposited, one, on top of another, conceptually like 3 D printing, on
>> a microscopic level.
>> Oddly enough, to get something made from your supplied artwork was
>> quite reasonable, compared to getting a new exhaust system put on the
>> car!
>> Back then, in the eighties, there were lots of independent
>> contractors with chip making capability, taking advantage of
>> government tax grants to encourage industry.
>> I'm out of touch now, but I know that you could sure make tiny vortex
>> nozzles that way, providing you have a usable design, by the square
>> meter.
>> When I got the chips made for the deadmau5 heads, we had to saw them
>> from big boards, that they were printed on, using a bandsaw, if you
>> can believe?
>> They were then cleaned up on a disc sanding machine.
>> They tested out with a 15% rejection rate, after, which is about average.
>> In your case, you can leave them in boards to fill surfaces perhaps?
>> What I am getting at, is that prototypes do not need to cost that much.
>> They are the golf playing suits that suck up the funds in an
>> organization.
>> Guys willing to put skin and bones on the line, get things done, and
>> don't cost that much.
>> If you are friends with your right and left hands, it is amazing what
>> just one person can do.
>> Cheers Warren
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 7:55 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>> [EVGRAY]
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I have clearly stated my opinion as to how any AG effect could
>> occur via the insect wing and shell theory. Vortex, counter
>> vortex induced flow could possibly create the effect. It would
>> agree with my theory of lift generated over aircraft wings etc.
>> in addition to Bernoulli and Newton's third Law. The tornado
>> induced vortex patterns could be the causing factors for the AG
>> effect we have seen. It all goes back to the fundamentals of
>> some sort of ionization of objects. All of the anti-gravity
>> examples have one common denominator, that being ionization
>> induced via Acustics, Hertzian wave, Vibratory Physics or vortex
>> generation. All occuring down at the atomic level. Yes, Stress
>> Fields.
>>
>> On 2/10/2019 2:24 PM, Mick [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> You were friends with Jerry and I know how he was very insistent
>>> the Grebenikov story was real or at least full of substance and
>>> he is the main reason everybody in the West with such interests
>>> is aware of it. Personally I think the gluing a bunch of insect
>>> wings part is a simile or metaphor.
>>>
>>> What is your opinion of the story and do you believe G may have
>>> created a levity platform and if so how?
>>>
>>> Being that stress fields (the ones the Russians were studying,
>>> cant recall the name now) create vectors at 90 degrees to the
>>> stress force I think an important part is imbuing this type of
>>> energy with angular momentum. Back to my beer can, compression
>>> on the ends expands the center. We try to first save the beer
>>> for Warren.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/10/2019 6:00 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Additional info. See http://www.rexresearch.com/pdf/levitylost.pdf
>>>>
>>>> On 2/10/2019 7:53 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, the most interesting work of Victor Schauberger was in
>>>>> the area of anti-gravity. One device that escapes mention was
>>>>> the Farrow Device. See,
>>>>> http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/farrow.htm here we use
>>>>> Hertzian waves, EM force which in reality is what happens in
>>>>> the Schauberger repulsine device because of the ionization
>>>>> that occurs. http://rexresearch.com/farrow/farrow.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> Back in 1996, a friend showed me a photograph of Victor
>>>>> Schauberger and Son, Walter riding in a C-54 aircraft, looking
>>>>> down on Sherman, TX, the proposed re-location home. see
>>>>>
>>>>> 1958 An American consortium offers financial means for
>>>>> practical experiments with "Implosion Energy". Visit to Texas
>>>>> with his son Walter. Return to Austria after a heavy dispute.
>>>>> (Schauberger, Viktor) Viktor Schauberger was forced to sign an
>>>>> agreement, forbidding him any further research with Implosion.
>>>>> All documents, models and equipment are left behind in the
>>>>> USA. Five days after his return, Viktor Schauberger dies on
>>>>> September 25th ...Viktor's Children: Walter, Margarete, Huberta
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/10/2019 7:29 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://peswiki.com/powerpedia:viktor-schauberger
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://sanet.st/blogs/games-musics/sacred_living_geometry_the_theories_of_viktor_schauberger.2401786.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_implosion.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://changingpower.net/w-baumgartner-will-be-missed/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After studying all of Victor's works and writings and
>>>>>> followed Walter Baumgartner's follow up works with Implosion
>>>>>> Technology, I got a real surprise in the fall of 1995. I was
>>>>>> in a mining camp up in BC, Canada, where we had a community
>>>>>> wash room, laundry area. The owners wife asked me to look at
>>>>>> the mop sink that would not drain properly. We filled the
>>>>>> sink to maximum capacity and pulled the drain plug.
>>>>>> Immediately, a very powerful vortex formed and you could look
>>>>>> down the 1 1/2 inch drain with the extreme vortex rotation
>>>>>> velocity. It would take, on average, about ten minutes for
>>>>>> the water to drain completely. Approximately 30 gallons of
>>>>>> water. Having read everything regarding the Golden Mean
>>>>>> Ratios and the influence in formation of the famous Implosion
>>>>>> vortex, I carefully measured all the dimensions of the mop
>>>>>> sink. Yes, the length vs width ratio of the sink box was a
>>>>>> perfect 1.618 ratio which was a major contributing factor
>>>>>> with the very powerful vortex formation. Instantly what
>>>>>> popped into my mind was to install an impeller on a shaft
>>>>>> suspended in the vortex core at the exit to capture the high
>>>>>> rotational energy. Both Victor and Walter wrote about the
>>>>>> corona charge that was produced by a very tightly defined
>>>>>> vortex core exit. Interesting phenomenon. TRUE STORY. BTW,
>>>>>> the Schauberger Implosion Vortex Technology is a perfect
>>>>>> replicas of the Black Hole Space Phenomenon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/10/2019 5:17 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-study-a-black-hole-s-hum-in-water-swirling-down-a-plug-hole
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Victor Schauberger "Implosion Vortex"!
>>
>