Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Magnetic fields and stuff gets interesting when Einstein gets envolved. RELATIVITY

Body

Thanks Norm! I was amazed when I read that!!

On 2/9/2019 9:03 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> If you have any interest in Plasma Research, this is an absolute  Must
> Read doc.
>
> http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/NewEnergy/Cranks/Johnson%20-%20The%20secret%20world%20of%20magnets.pdf
>
> On 2/5/2019 6:45 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Thank You Art for contributing to this ongoing dialog on Plasma
>> Physics and the exciting findings achieved by some heavy weight
>> researchers into the Magnetic Flux Annihilation-Reconnect Phenomenon.
>> We learn more every week since this is a current subject.   Norm
>>
>> On 2/5/2019 5:01 PM, Arthur Devine wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings all from Art Devine,
>>>
>>> Bert Pool’s  astute comments of 1/1/2019  #1-5 are right on track as
>>> I see it.
>>>
>>> Just as certain elements are selectively tailored to coerce magnetic
>>> fields to attract or repel locally,  Gravitational waves, “like
>>> boiled spaghetti” are everywhere between known matter in the
>>> universe.   Never forget that space is always infinite and there is
>>> no such thing as time until there is matter and it’s chaos we intend
>>> to deal with.  Time is just a local  term for “when” 
>>>
>>> on our planet only.  String theory is not theory.  It is evidence of
>>> gravitational repulsion between objects in nearby and intergalactic
>>> space.  Any comet with a tail repelling our sun is negative matter.
>>>
>>> It’s the only reason any comet like Haley’s returning gets ever more
>>> distant each time.
>>>
>>> The “solar wind” is negative matter repelling the sun that created
>>> it.  Our volcanoes repel tons of it _trapped in our primordial mass_.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> We will simply never get buried in any matter having positive
>>> electrons.   Art
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *From:*Norman Wootan [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2019 7:45 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]; Art Devine; Ben Smith; Bert Pool; Bob
>>> Paddock; joel mcclain; Lane Wootan; Mbking42; Steven Elswick; Walt;
>>> Toby Grotz; Angel Alvarez; Fredric Fletcher; Jeane Manning; Jon
>>> Gentry; Phil Rembold
>>> *Subject:* Re: Magnetic fields and stuff gets interesting when
>>> Einstein gets envolved. RELATIVITY
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Mick, let us not forget this guy that was lost in the history of
>>> magnets.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrus_Peregrinus_de_Maricourt
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_compass
>>>
>>> http://www.thefullwiki.org/Magnetic_compass       Now we know how
>>> Warren gets from Canada to New Zealand.  Lol
>>>
>>> ===============================================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> Message 4192                                   DATE/TIME: 01/10/94
>>> 20:33
>>> From   : JOEL MCCLAIN                       -- RECEIVED --
>>> To     : NORMAN WOOTAN
>>> Subject: (R) Pereginus Motor
>>> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>>>
>>> Hi Norm,
>>> I had a friend, who is a historian, check out old Peregrinus, and it
>>> turns out that he's the guy who first recognized magnetic "poles" as
>>> such, and labelled them.  Later, he invented the graduated and
>>> calibrated compass!  Wonder why history has all but forgotten him?
>>> I'll bring the info to the next meeting...btw, when is it?
>>> CUL
>>> Joel
>>> ===============================================================================
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/4/2019 8:42 AM, Mick [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Must read!!!
>>>
>>> http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/NewEnergy/Cranks/Johnson%20-%20The%20secret%20world%20of%20magnets.pdf
>>>
>>> On 2/4/2019 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Back on new years day, Bert gave an excellent explanation of
>>> magnetic fields.  Please review.
>>>
>>> On 1/1/2019 9:20 AM, Bert Pool wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) Faraday generator experiments show that the magnetic field coming
>>> out of a magnet pole does NOT rotate when the magnet is rotated. 
>>> You can glue a Faraday disk to the magnet and rotate both and the
>>> disk generates a current.  I.e., the lines of force surrounding the
>>> magnet are stationary, even if the magnet rotates!  The magnet has
>>> to be there to align the flux lines and concentrate them, but the
>>> lines of flux are part and parcel of space and do not originate with
>>> the magnet.  Think of the magnet as a necessary "catalyst" for the
>>> flux.  To me, this shows that magnets do NOT produce a magnetic
>>> field, but instead they align and condense _magnetic flux that is
>>> already in that space_.
>>>
>>> 2) I visualize space as being filled with billions and billions of
>>> flux lines all coming from every possible direction and every
>>> possible north/south polarity.  Think of space as filled with a mass
>>> of boiled spaghetti, representing a chaotic mixture of flux lines. 
>>> Since these lines are completely random as to polarity, the sum
>>> values of all the flux in any one spot averages to zero.  But, when
>>> you place a chunk of special metal (we call it a magnet) into that
>>> space, it bends and aligns these random flux lines all into the same
>>> direction and polarity.  A magnet does not produce a magnetic field,
>>> it brings order and coherence to the mass of field lines that
>>> already exist in that space surrounding the magnet.  Think of it as
>>> taking that mass of bent, twisted and random spaghetti and
>>> straightening it out into nice, neat straight aligned fields.
>>>
>>> 3) Why do certain metal combinations affect magnetic lines of flux,
>>> while others do not?  I don't think anyone has a good answer to
>>> that.  For example, Alnico magnets are made of aluminum and cobalt. 
>>> Aluminum is non-magnetic, so why is aluminum required for an alnico
>>> magnet to work? 
>>>
>>> 4)  If space is filled with a random mass of magnetic flux lines
>>> that sum to zero, and are only evident to us as observers when a
>>> mass of appropriate metal alloy (a magnet) is present, then I wonder
>>> are there other kinds of flux filling space, somewhat like lines of
>>> magnetic flux, that are not apparent to us because they too sum to
>>> zero, but would appear if only a different kind of "magnet" were
>>> constructed which aligns those other non-magnetic fields, thus
>>> making them evident.  For example, it could be that gravity fields
>>> cross through space from all directions and with random orientations
>>> and normally sum to zero.  If I place you into space a few billion
>>> miles from anything else, will you experience "gravity"?  No.  But
>>> place a suitable piece of properly made alloy into that space, and
>>> it would align and concentrate those lines of gravitational flux so
>>> that we can percieve this new thing we might call a gravitational
>>> field.  Fortunately, the alloy for gravitational flux already
>>> exists, and is called "matter."  Some alloys work better at aligning
>>> and concentrating gravitational flux lines, just as different metal
>>> alloys differ in their ability to align and concentrate magnetic
>>> flux lines.  Some kinds of metals work better as magnets than
>>> others.  Some kinds of mass work better as gravity concentrators
>>> than others (i.e., styrofoam versus lead.)
>>>
>>> 5) Magnetic field lines can be affected by electrical coils, which
>>> perform the same alignment and concentration of flux lines in space
>>> that permant magnets do.  It might very well be possible that
>>> producing a gravitational analog is possible.  Of course, the
>>> question becomes, what would the "coil" be made of, and what kind of
>>> energy would flow through it to align and concentrate gravity?  And
>>> perhaps not only gravity.  There could be other kinds of energy that
>>> fills space and sums to zero without the presence of a suitable
>>> nearby "magnet."  Dark energy comes to mind as a possible example.
>>>
>>> Bert
>>>
>>> On 2/5/2019 9:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     https://www.physics-and-radio-electronics.com/electronic-devices-and-circuits/semiconductor/intrinsic-semiconductor/electron-and-hole-current.html
>>>
>>>
>>>     https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/semiconductors/chpt-2/electrons-and-holes/
>>>
>>>
>>>     https://www.quora.com/How-does-one-explain-electricity-at-relativistic-speeds
>>>     This is absolutely a great dissertation on my main interest in
>>>     NEGATIVE ELECTRICITY.
>>>
>>>     See 33432 at attachments    Remember my paper on WHAT is HEAT,
>>>     negative Ions = cold, positive Ions = hot.
>>>
>>>     See InTech at attachments
>>>
>>>     https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/71099/relativity-and-current-in-wire
>>>
>>>
>>>     https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/introduction-to-ee/intro-to-ee/v/ee-conventional-current
>>>
>>>
>>>     https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/introduction-to-ee/intro-to-ee/v/current-direction
>>>
>>>
>>>     https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/magnetic-forces-and-magnetic-fields/magnetic-field-current-carrying-wire/v/magnetism-6-magnetic-field-due-to-current
>>>
>>>
>>>     Warren, You are an Old Navy Salt, Sailor, whom will appreciate
>>>     the color coding of conductors by the Marine Industry, taken
>>>     from the U.S. Navy days gone by.   When I went through DeVry
>>>     School in 1953, I learned that Black was common ground in a
>>>     circuit and white
>>>
>>>     was the hot wire. U.S. Navy.  Remember when General motors used
>>>     a POSITIVE ground on their cars and Ford had a NEGATIVE ground
>>>     as did the U.S. Navy to prevent the electroylisis problem.  We
>>>     had to be careful when using battery cables trying to jump start
>>>     a Chevy from a Ford battery, cause of opposite polarity.  Gee. 
>>>     The salt used on the roads up North ate up the fenders of
>>>     Chevys. Lol
>>>
>>>
>