Body
https://sciencing.com/metals-make-good-conductors-electricity-8115694.html
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_is_silver_more_conductive_than_other_metals
https://www.bluesea.com/resources/108/Electrical_Conductivity_of_Materials
http://eddy-current.com/conductivity-of-metals-sorted-by-resistivity/
Back when I built a 12" replica of the famous Dotto Ring, I had to put
my copper ring in an annealing furnace and bring up the temp to the
curie point of the copper to get the dead soft annealed conductivity
specified. I have told all of you about getting the max performance out
of your coils by going through the annealing step to relieve the work
hardening due to bending stress.
https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/m/0lrn5&hl=en-US&kgs=8eb4e8960f9f4384&q=Phonon&shndl=0&source=sh/x/kp&entrypoint=sh/x/kp
Something very important here is the role of the Phonon in electron
mobility within the atomic lattice. Bert, this sort of answers the
question that Joel and I had as having to warm up the MRA Piezo crystal
and Barium ferrite magnet before it displayed the O/U traits. Acoustic
energy moves those electrons around.
https://www.chemicool.com/definition/phonons.html
https://www.yourdictionary.com/phonon
On 2/5/2019 9:44 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Mick, let us not forget this guy that was lost in the history of magnets.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrus_Peregrinus_de_Maricourt
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_compass
>
> http://www.thefullwiki.org/Magnetic_compass Now we know how Warren
> gets from Canada to New Zealand. Lol
>
> ===============================================================================
>
>
> Message 4192 DATE/TIME: 01/10/94 20:33
> From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> To : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: (R) Pereginus Motor
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Norm,
> I had a friend, who is a historian, check out old Peregrinus, and it
> turns out that he's the guy who first recognized magnetic "poles" as
> such, and labelled them. Later, he invented the graduated and
> calibrated compass! Wonder why history has all but forgotten him?
> I'll bring the info to the next meeting...btw, when is it?
> CUL
> Joel
> ===============================================================================
>
>
> On 2/4/2019 8:42 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Must read!!!
>
> http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/NewEnergy/Cranks/Johnson%20-%20The%20secret%20world%20of%20magnets.pdf
>
> On 2/4/2019 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Back on new years day, Bert gave an excellent explanation of magnetic
> fields. Please review.
>
> On 1/1/2019 9:20 AM, Bert Pool wrote:
>
> 1) Faraday generator experiments show that the magnetic field coming
> out of a magnet pole does NOT rotate when the magnet is rotated. You
> can glue a Faraday disk to the magnet and rotate both and the disk
> generates a current. I.e., the lines of force surrounding the magnet
> are stationary, even if the magnet rotates! The magnet has to be
> there to align the flux lines and concentrate them, but the lines of
> flux are part and parcel of space and do not originate with the
> magnet. Think of the magnet as a necessary "catalyst" for the flux.
> To me, this shows that magnets do NOT produce a magnetic field, but
> instead they align and condense _magnetic flux that is already in that
> space_.
>
> 2) I visualize space as being filled with billions and billions of
> flux lines all coming from every possible direction and every possible
> north/south polarity. Think of space as filled with a mass of boiled
> spaghetti, representing a chaotic mixture of flux lines. Since these
> lines are completely random as to polarity, the sum values of all the
> flux in any one spot averages to zero. But, when you place a chunk of
> special metal (we call it a magnet) into that space, it bends and
> aligns these random flux lines all into the same direction and
> polarity. A magnet does not produce a magnetic field, it brings order
> and coherence to the mass of field lines that already exist in that
> space surrounding the magnet. Think of it as taking that mass of
> bent, twisted and random spaghetti and straightening it out into nice,
> neat straight aligned fields.
>
> 3) Why do certain metal combinations affect magnetic lines of flux,
> while others do not? I don't think anyone has a good answer to that.
> For example, Alnico magnets are made of aluminum and cobalt. Aluminum
> is non-magnetic, so why is aluminum required for an alnico magnet to
> work?
>
> 4) If space is filled with a random mass of magnetic flux lines that
> sum to zero, and are only evident to us as observers when a mass of
> appropriate metal alloy (a magnet) is present, then I wonder are there
> other kinds of flux filling space, somewhat like lines of magnetic
> flux, that are not apparent to us because they too sum to zero, but
> would appear if only a different kind of "magnet" were constructed
> which aligns those other non-magnetic fields, thus making them
> evident. For example, it could be that gravity fields cross through
> space from all directions and with random orientations and normally
> sum to zero. If I place you into space a few billion miles from
> anything else, will you experience "gravity"? No. But place a
> suitable piece of properly made alloy into that space, and it would
> align and concentrate those lines of gravitational flux so that we can
> percieve this new thing we might call a gravitational field.
> Fortunately, the alloy for gravitational flux already exists, and is
> called "matter." Some alloys work better at aligning and
> concentrating gravitational flux lines, just as different metal alloys
> differ in their ability to align and concentrate magnetic flux lines.
> Some kinds of metals work better as magnets than others. Some kinds
> of mass work better as gravity concentrators than others (i.e.,
> styrofoam versus lead.)
>
> 5) Magnetic field lines can be affected by electrical coils, which
> perform the same alignment and concentration of flux lines in space
> that permant magnets do. It might very well be possible that
> producing a gravitational analog is possible. Of course, the question
> becomes, what would the "coil" be made of, and what kind of energy
> would flow through it to align and concentrate gravity? And perhaps
> not only gravity. There could be other kinds of energy that fills
> space and sums to zero without the presence of a suitable nearby
> "magnet." Dark energy comes to mind as a possible example.
>
> Bert
> On 2/5/2019 9:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> https://www.physics-and-radio-electronics.com/electronic-devices-and-circuits/semiconductor/intrinsic-semiconductor/electron-and-hole-current.html
>>
>>
>> https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/semiconductors/chpt-2/electrons-and-holes/
>>
>>
>> https://www.quora.com/How-does-one-explain-electricity-at-relativistic-speeds
>> This is absolutely a great dissertation on my main interest in
>> NEGATIVE ELECTRICITY.
>>
>> See 33432 at attachments Remember my paper on WHAT is HEAT,
>> negative Ions = cold, positive Ions = hot.
>>
>> See InTech at attachments
>>
>> https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/71099/relativity-and-current-in-wire
>>
>>
>> https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/introduction-to-ee/intro-to-ee/v/ee-conventional-current
>>
>>
>> https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/introduction-to-ee/intro-to-ee/v/current-direction
>>
>>
>> https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/magnetic-forces-and-magnetic-fields/magnetic-field-current-carrying-wire/v/magnetism-6-magnetic-field-due-to-current
>>
>>
>> Warren, You are an Old Navy Salt, Sailor, whom will appreciate the
>> color coding of conductors by the Marine Industry, taken from the
>> U.S. Navy days gone by. When I went through DeVry School in 1953, I
>> learned that Black was common ground in a circuit and white
>>
>> was the hot wire. U.S. Navy. Remember when General motors used a
>> POSITIVE ground on their cars and Ford had a NEGATIVE ground as did
>> the U.S. Navy to prevent the electroylisis problem. We had to be
>> careful when using battery cables trying to jump start a Chevy from a
>> Ford battery, cause of opposite polarity. Gee. The salt used on the
>> roads up North ate up the fenders of Chevys. Lol
>>
>>
>>
>