Body
Thank You Art for contributing to this ongoing dialog on Plasma Physics
and the exciting findings achieved by some heavy weight researchers into
the Magnetic Flux Annihilation-Reconnect Phenomenon. We learn more every
week since this is a current subject. Norm
On 2/5/2019 5:01 PM, Arthur Devine wrote:
>
> Greetings all from Art Devine,
>
> Bert Pool’s astute comments of 1/1/2019 #1-5 are right on track as I
> see it.
>
> Just as certain elements are selectively tailored to coerce magnetic
> fields to attract or repel locally, Gravitational waves, “like boiled
> spaghetti” are everywhere between known matter in the universe.
> Never forget that space is always infinite and there is no such thing
> as time until there is matter and it’s chaos we intend to deal with.
> Time is just a local term for “when”
>
> on our planet only. String theory is not theory. It is evidence of
> gravitational repulsion between objects in nearby and intergalactic
> space. Any comet with a tail repelling our sun is negative matter.
>
> It’s the only reason any comet like Haley’s returning gets ever more
> distant each time.
>
> The “solar wind” is negative matter repelling the sun that created
> it. Our volcanoes repel tons of it _trapped in our primordial mass_.
>
> We will simply never get buried in any matter having positive
> electrons. Art
>
> *From:*Norman Wootan [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2019 7:45 AM
> *To:* [email protected]; Art Devine; Ben Smith; Bert Pool; Bob
> Paddock; joel mcclain; Lane Wootan; Mbking42; Steven Elswick; Walt;
> Toby Grotz; Angel Alvarez; Fredric Fletcher; Jeane Manning; Jon
> Gentry; Phil Rembold
> *Subject:* Re: Magnetic fields and stuff gets interesting when
> Einstein gets envolved. RELATIVITY
>
> Mick, let us not forget this guy that was lost in the history of magnets.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrus_Peregrinus_de_Maricourt
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_compass
>
> http://www.thefullwiki.org/Magnetic_compass Now we know how Warren
> gets from Canada to New Zealand. Lol
>
> ===============================================================================
>
>
> Message 4192 DATE/TIME: 01/10/94 20:33
> From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED --
> To : NORMAN WOOTAN
> Subject: (R) Pereginus Motor
> Folder : A, "Public Mail"
>
> Hi Norm,
> I had a friend, who is a historian, check out old Peregrinus, and it
> turns out that he's the guy who first recognized magnetic "poles" as
> such, and labelled them. Later, he invented the graduated and
> calibrated compass! Wonder why history has all but forgotten him?
> I'll bring the info to the next meeting...btw, when is it?
> CUL
> Joel
> ===============================================================================
>
>
> On 2/4/2019 8:42 AM, Mick [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Must read!!!
>
> http://exvacuo.free.fr/div/Sciences/NewEnergy/Cranks/Johnson%20-%20The%20secret%20world%20of%20magnets.pdf
>
> On 2/4/2019 5:47 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Back on new years day, Bert gave an excellent explanation of magnetic
> fields. Please review.
>
> On 1/1/2019 9:20 AM, Bert Pool wrote:
>
> 1) Faraday generator experiments show that the magnetic field coming
> out of a magnet pole does NOT rotate when the magnet is rotated. You
> can glue a Faraday disk to the magnet and rotate both and the disk
> generates a current. I.e., the lines of force surrounding the magnet
> are stationary, even if the magnet rotates! The magnet has to be
> there to align the flux lines and concentrate them, but the lines of
> flux are part and parcel of space and do not originate with the
> magnet. Think of the magnet as a necessary "catalyst" for the flux.
> To me, this shows that magnets do NOT produce a magnetic field, but
> instead they align and condense _magnetic flux that is already in that
> space_.
>
> 2) I visualize space as being filled with billions and billions of
> flux lines all coming from every possible direction and every possible
> north/south polarity. Think of space as filled with a mass of boiled
> spaghetti, representing a chaotic mixture of flux lines. Since these
> lines are completely random as to polarity, the sum values of all the
> flux in any one spot averages to zero. But, when you place a chunk of
> special metal (we call it a magnet) into that space, it bends and
> aligns these random flux lines all into the same direction and
> polarity. A magnet does not produce a magnetic field, it brings order
> and coherence to the mass of field lines that already exist in that
> space surrounding the magnet. Think of it as taking that mass of
> bent, twisted and random spaghetti and straightening it out into nice,
> neat straight aligned fields.
>
> 3) Why do certain metal combinations affect magnetic lines of flux,
> while others do not? I don't think anyone has a good answer to that.
> For example, Alnico magnets are made of aluminum and cobalt. Aluminum
> is non-magnetic, so why is aluminum required for an alnico magnet to
> work?
>
> 4) If space is filled with a random mass of magnetic flux lines that
> sum to zero, and are only evident to us as observers when a mass of
> appropriate metal alloy (a magnet) is present, then I wonder are there
> other kinds of flux filling space, somewhat like lines of magnetic
> flux, that are not apparent to us because they too sum to zero, but
> would appear if only a different kind of "magnet" were constructed
> which aligns those other non-magnetic fields, thus making them
> evident. For example, it could be that gravity fields cross through
> space from all directions and with random orientations and normally
> sum to zero. If I place you into space a few billion miles from
> anything else, will you experience "gravity"? No. But place a
> suitable piece of properly made alloy into that space, and it would
> align and concentrate those lines of gravitational flux so that we can
> percieve this new thing we might call a gravitational field.
> Fortunately, the alloy for gravitational flux already exists, and is
> called "matter." Some alloys work better at aligning and
> concentrating gravitational flux lines, just as different metal alloys
> differ in their ability to align and concentrate magnetic flux lines.
> Some kinds of metals work better as magnets than others. Some kinds
> of mass work better as gravity concentrators than others (i.e.,
> styrofoam versus lead.)
>
> 5) Magnetic field lines can be affected by electrical coils, which
> perform the same alignment and concentration of flux lines in space
> that permant magnets do. It might very well be possible that
> producing a gravitational analog is possible. Of course, the question
> becomes, what would the "coil" be made of, and what kind of energy
> would flow through it to align and concentrate gravity? And perhaps
> not only gravity. There could be other kinds of energy that fills
> space and sums to zero without the presence of a suitable nearby
> "magnet." Dark energy comes to mind as a possible example.
>
> Bert
>
> On 2/5/2019 9:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
>
> https://www.physics-and-radio-electronics.com/electronic-devices-and-circuits/semiconductor/intrinsic-semiconductor/electron-and-hole-current.html
>
>
> https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/semiconductors/chpt-2/electrons-and-holes/
>
>
> https://www.quora.com/How-does-one-explain-electricity-at-relativistic-speeds
> This is absolutely a great dissertation on my main interest in
> NEGATIVE ELECTRICITY.
>
> See 33432 at attachments Remember my paper on WHAT is HEAT,
> negative Ions = cold, positive Ions = hot.
>
> See InTech at attachments
>
> https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/71099/relativity-and-current-in-wire
>
>
> https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/introduction-to-ee/intro-to-ee/v/ee-conventional-current
>
>
> https://www.khanacademy.org/science/electrical-engineering/introduction-to-ee/intro-to-ee/v/current-direction
>
>
> https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/magnetic-forces-and-magnetic-fields/magnetic-field-current-carrying-wire/v/magnetism-6-magnetic-field-due-to-current
>
>
> Warren, You are an Old Navy Salt, Sailor, whom will appreciate the
> color coding of conductors by the Marine Industry, taken from the
> U.S. Navy days gone by. When I went through DeVry School in
> 1953, I learned that Black was common ground in a circuit and white
>
> was the hot wire. U.S. Navy. Remember when General motors used a
> POSITIVE ground on their cars and Ford had a NEGATIVE ground as
> did the U.S. Navy to prevent the electroylisis problem. We had to
> be careful when using battery cables trying to jump start a Chevy
> from a Ford battery, cause of opposite polarity. Gee. The salt
> used on the roads up North ate up the fenders of Chevys. Lol
>
>