Body
Hi Ole,
Why u instead of V?
Yes the inductor is a current source and acts as a current flywheel,
good metaphor.
Can you explain the fabled flux capacitor of Faraday and what may indeed
be considered as such if one uses plasma states for instance?
On 1/25/2019 1:33 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> Hi Norman, Mick,
>
> "...a reverse current is being induced into the iron core coil with
> the reverse polarity."
> The current continues in the same direction while the voltage or
> tension changes sign. The current can't be stopped or having its
> direction changed in a jump as it is always continuous. It would be
> like immediately stopping or changing the direction of a running
> flywheel. The force required or given off is like the voltage when
> speaking coils. The voltage or force will be of infinite size if the
> change happens in an instant. The current starts decreasing from
> whatever value it has at the disruption. Only how fast is related to
> the size of the induced voltage (u = L x di/dt) where u is the
> voltage, L is the inductance of the coil, i is the current and t is
> time. di/dt is the slope of the current.
>
> Regards
> Ole
>
>
> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>
> Mick, first envision a North-South magnetic poles embedded in
> flywheel. When the North-South magnets bridge the first two poles of
> the stator (rotation) a forward going current is induced into iron
> core coil and at same time charges up condenser to max. Important note
> here is that the impedance of coil is LC matched to the value of the
> condenser. When the North-South magnets move over to the middle and
> last poles, breaker points open and at same time a reverse current is
> being induced into the iron core coil with the reverse polarity, the
> condenser discharges through coil windings to frame ground. With the
> condenser being charged via the forward going current, 1st step, when
> it discharges into coil a reverse current is being induced by moving
> magnets. In effect you have opposing currents, opposite polarity,
> (BUCKING-OPPOSED) which cause a miniature magnetic flux annihilation
> event and a MAGNETO-ELECTRIC, micro EMP event. That is the reason the
> old magnetos had such a powerful spark even when you turned them by
> hand at super low RPM. I worked on thousands of them on my magneto
> test bench. Norm
>
> On 1/25/2019 9:20 AM, Mick mkjekyll@... <mailto:mkjekyll@...> [EVGRAY]
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Norm,
>>
>> So this is the same effect from the 3 pole magneto you showed us,
>> when the cap discharges during the collapsing flyback pulse and
>> compresses the delta?
>>
>> Were three poles used in parallel in order to make sure the iron
>> was fully saturated even at low speed in the old magneto?
>>
>> On 1/25/2019 9:35 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Your quote, feed it a reverse potential as voltage is maximal
>>> peaking and you have a mother of an EMP neutral spike on your
>>> hands ! Yeeeeeeaaaaah! Hector my friend, you got it
>>> exactly right. In all my experience with old time magnetos, this
>>> is exactly how the conderser discharge through the primary
>>> windings happens with reverse polarity. Bang, you get a sharp
>>> crack spark discharge in the bright blue wave lengths. Not a
>>> measily orange spark without any zip to it. The 5HP
>>> compressor, EMP test I did works this way.
>>>
>>> On 1/25/2019 6:35 AM, arkresearch@... <mailto:arkresearch@...>
>>> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you short a coil current becomes maximal voltage stays lag
>>>> at zero upon max core saturation , then at short cut off
>>>> ,voltage becomes leading and maximal as current drop to zero
>>>> ... basic RF neutral spike dynamics !
>>>>
>>>> feed it a reverse potential as voltage is maximal peaking and
>>>> you have a mother of an EMP neutral spike on your hands !
>>>>
>>>> (H) other methods are applicable ,,, rotary is best for
>>>> simplicity ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---In [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>> <konehead@...> <mailto:konehead@...> wrote :
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mick
>>>> "would require shorting to saturate the core from passing a magnet"
>>>> Did you mean:
>>>> "would require shorting to saturate the core from a passing
>>>> magnet" ?
>>>> I don't know something else?
>>>> Also wouldn't a shorted coil become rf transmitter not so much
>>>> an antenna?
>>>> Anyways still confused but just half way confused now..
>>>> Kone
>
>