Body
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/358727/two-electrons-exchanging-a-photon
On 1/12/2019 6:56 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> I just love some of the answers found on these physics sites. Lol
> OOOOOOOOH BOY!!! YOU GON ON TO MAKE A DOOZY OF A WIRL-WIN AIN'TCHA?!?!
>
> https://www.quora.com/What-will-happen-if-two-electrons-collide-Or-in-other-words-can-we-fuse-electrons
>
> On 1/12/2019 3:01 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Jon Gentry sent me this interesting book preview! Take a look:
>> https://books.google.com/books?id=Ec6MP26x6J8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
>>
>> On 1/12/2019 7:19 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> Bert Pool and Phil will appreciate this little piece of history of
>>> my research into Tesla back in the 70s. Before I met the boys of Ft.
>>> Worth Tesla Coil Builders, I called D C Cox and ordered a plan set
>>> for my first Tesla Coil. At the time I also asked for plans for a
>>> large Van de Graff Generator and got a resounding NO! Cox explained
>>> the huge difference between the two systems. In the Van de Graff you
>>> are accumulating charge (electrostatic) that when discharged is a
>>> multi-million volt discharge (DC) that, if you are grounded, flows
>>> through the body and will kill you deader that hell. The Tesla Coil
>>> on the other hand is HVAC at high frequency therefore travels over
>>> your body (skin effect) and will do no harm since the discharge
>>> never penetrates the body. Oh! Take off any metals from your body
>>> such as bracelets, rings etc. cause the high freq will cause heating
>>> and will burn you. I remember my first visit with Bert and Leslie
>>> at his Teslathon at Irving Texas back in the 80s.
>>>
>>> https://vimeo.com/channels/resonanceresearch
>>>
>>> https://library.e.abb.com/public/6d17725e73e547d6922c408557562ec4/DC_Resonance%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Hybrid%20HVDC%20System.pdf
>>>
>>> A note here that is of interest to Angel and Fredric since they are
>>> very active in the transmission of HVDC at megawatt levels. Any
>>> system that has the basic components of an LC circuit is subject to
>>> a resonance effect. So do not say "What, Resonance in a DC
>>> circuit"??? The switching will get you every time. Lol Norm
>>>
>>> On 1/12/2019 6:42 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Since it was mentioned in the reddit article:
>>>> https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Ultimate_Reality.html?id=ySsNiCPUPecC
>>>>
>>>> On 1/12/2019 6:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Glad you asked there Mick for almost all of us have our copies of
>>>>> Joseph Cater's Book, Awesome Life Force in which he uses the terms
>>>>> Hard Electrons vs Soft Electrons. The Scientific Community take a
>>>>> dim view of publications such as this BUT teach, even at MIT that
>>>>> there are hard vs Soft electrons??
>>>>>
>>>>> See;
>>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/6twjgw/eli5_what_are_soft_and_hard_electrons/
>>>>>
>>>>> MIT lecture on Superposition:
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ3bPUKo5zc&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
>>>>>
>>>>> To sum up this whole argument, this article says it best
>>>>> https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-static-and-vs-dynamic-electricity/
>>>>> If it is moving (dynamic) they are hard electrons and carry a
>>>>> magnetic field and electric field. If they are standing still,
>>>>> (no movement) they are Soft Electrons. Moving charges create
>>>>> fields. You can charge a large capacitor via an influence machine
>>>>> (electrostatic generator) and as long as the charge is at rest
>>>>> state, it is static electricity. When you discharge the capacitor,
>>>>> the resultant moving of charge (dynamic) creates the fields due to
>>>>> moving charge. This is how I see it.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma_classification_(types_of_plasma)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a friend, Leonard Dorsett that lived at Grapevine, TX by the
>>>>> lake. In the evening, just at dusk, the metal roof of his house
>>>>> would glow due to a strange ionization soft plasma. We never
>>>>> figured out this phenomenon.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/11/2019 8:09 PM, Mick [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please distill the concept of soft particles? I read
>>>>>> the Cater book and for some reason have a disconnect concerning
>>>>>> what defines a soft or hard electron etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/11/2019 9:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://physics.tutorcircle.com/modern-physics/pair-production.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/11/2019 7:15 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225697264_A_standing_wave_acoustic_levitation_system_for_large_planar_objects
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ja Brink & John ,"Thanks for your comments"! Since I went to
>>>>>>>> Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and am a dual rated
>>>>>>>> aviator (rotary wing), I concur with your observation regarding
>>>>>>>> the lift multiplication with multiple "counter rotating" rotors
>>>>>>>> for this is where the "pair production" of vortices happens
>>>>>>>> which gives an order of magnitude gross lift.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having studied the large beetles (Rhinobeetle) it is
>>>>>>>> interesting to watch in slow motion video, them first cam
>>>>>>>> forward and outward and lock their Elytra (Wing cover shell)
>>>>>>>> "no lift yet", then start rotary wing motion which activates
>>>>>>>> the micro cavity structure (under side of Elyton) then take off
>>>>>>>> with surprising ease! The anomalous lift is induced by the
>>>>>>>> wing motion air currents under the shells. "Pure and simple"!
>>>>>>>> Look at the video and please note several Elyton (shells)
>>>>>>>> laying on table "cup side down" and are not "hovering". They
>>>>>>>> are not "glued down to table top" so if the "static" lift
>>>>>>>> theory were valid they could not simply lie there motionless!
>>>>>>>> It takes the vortex air movement to create the eddy flow which
>>>>>>>> in-turn activates the AG effects the same as seen in close
>>>>>>>> proximity tornado vortex eddy air flows. Please see shells
>>>>>>>> laying cup side down here:
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW6uOW4aoJQ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dallas tornado 2005, semi trailers suspended in mid air!
>>>>>>>> (outside of tornado vortex). 53 ft. trailer weighing 12,000 #s
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2017 9:52 PM, jabrinka [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In the study of flight when using models to determine flight
>>>>>>>>> characteristics the models are typically smaller than the
>>>>>>>>> aircraft design being studied however the components that make
>>>>>>>>> up air remain the same size so... a smaller version will be
>>>>>>>>> operating in relatively more dense compressible fluid. This is
>>>>>>>>> known as scale effect. When a fish swings its tail to one side
>>>>>>>>> a vortex is created as a result. On the return swing the tail
>>>>>>>>> has the additional rotary motion (angular momentum) to push
>>>>>>>>> against as opposed to a stationary volume of fluid resulting
>>>>>>>>> in extra thrust. This explains the increased efficiency of
>>>>>>>>> multiple rotors on an aircraft drone or otherwise.
>>>>>>>>> On the lungan mousetrap buzzer thread, sometime ago 2007ish on
>>>>>>>>> this forum a member Gary (the Skipper ) had a design for a
>>>>>>>>> long coil with em/back emf collecting coils along its length.
>>>>>>>>> I had almost finished my reproduction when the latest spook
>>>>>>>>> showed up with several wild geese for me to chase. Lost my
>>>>>>>>> house and havent made another coil yet. The buzzer kickback
>>>>>>>>> Norm mentioned spelled out for me how Ron Cole's electric car
>>>>>>>>> with all the clicking relays must have worked (before he was
>>>>>>>>> disappeared). Evidently grounding to the car frame was enough
>>>>>>>>> to make a neutral spike of sorts.. heh....heh. Best to all Ja
>>>>>>>>> Brink
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John! Watch this video and pay close attention to the "Bird in
>>>>>>>> flight part"! See:
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcNGwmV1Yio "Vortex pair
>>>>>>>> generation via leading edge feathers" allows bird to land
>>>>>>>> "vertically"!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2017 8:45 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John: Sorry! I did not see any evidence of "lift" or
>>>>>>>> anti-gravity with "dead bug" parts! What are you referring to
>>>>>>>> with the window blind & glue??? I did not see this evidence??
>>>>>>>> My "pair production of counter rotating vortices" is a "dynamic
>>>>>>>> flow" situation and contend that you do not have evidence of a
>>>>>>>> "static" no air flow lift situation! Please show me some
>>>>>>>> evidence of a totally "static lift". Sure! the movement of
>>>>>>>> "Elytra" on a table top was shown as false due to
>>>>>>>> "electrostatic effects". I can walk across a polyester carpet
>>>>>>>> and pick up a pair of steel tweasers and make the Elyton move
>>>>>>>> about via electrostatic charge! Nothing conclusive here! Show
>>>>>>>> me a Elyton hovering in air "static, no air flow" over the
>>>>>>>> table, them I will be convinced! Sure there is the "AG" effect
>>>>>>>> when the wings of the bug provide the necessary circulating
>>>>>>>> vortex air flow within the micro cavities under the Elytra thus
>>>>>>>> giving the anomalous lift we all see as evidence that very
>>>>>>>> large bugs, rhinobeatles and bumblebees can achieve what the
>>>>>>>> text books prove cannot be done. "Fly"!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sometimes it is great to be able to go back and retreive
>>>>>>>> messages that are applicable to today's topics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2019 6:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok! folks, Ole has brought up a very interesting point when
>>>>>>>>> comparing the air mass, weather and the phenomenon of
>>>>>>>>> levitation, anti-gravity etc. Something that I have been
>>>>>>>>> wanting to bring up but the subject is a little far out of the
>>>>>>>>> mainstream thinking. Lets look at a profound statement here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alfven quote:"If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives rise to an
>>>>>>>>> E.M.F. which produces electric currents. Owing to the magnetic
>>>>>>>>> field, these currents give mechanical forces which change the
>>>>>>>>> state of motion of the liquid. Thus a kind of combined
>>>>>>>>> electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced.^"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ^Back when I posted the articles on electrostatic generators,
>>>>>>>>> I had stated that the 9th grade Science Class explanation for
>>>>>>>>> the source of the electrons was believed to be a shearing from
>>>>>>>>> the air as the device rotated, example Wimshurst Machine.
>>>>>>>>> WRONG. I gave you the example of the Felici Electrostatic
>>>>>>>>> Generator
>>>>>>>>> http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/highvoltage/HVgenerator/HVgenerator.htm
>>>>>>>>> Here we have a device that uses pure hydrogen gas at 30 bar
>>>>>>>>> pressure as the operating media and produces 2.5 KW at
>>>>>>>>> 300KV. CERN is operating an electrostatic generator that has
>>>>>>>>> a deep vacuum as the operating media. ?? Ole's example of
>>>>>>>>> air is interesting for we have discussed tornadoes and how we
>>>>>>>>> observe Anti-gravitic phenomenon at the vortex base due to
>>>>>>>>> the counter rotating, vortex-anti vortex eddy currents in
>>>>>>>>> which we get the Alfven example of
>>>>>>>>> Electromagnetic-hydrodynamics. We see this same example in the
>>>>>>>>> Sonodiffuser with the production of the micro cavitation
>>>>>>>>> production of vortex-counter vortex producing the photon
>>>>>>>>> burst. Air when ionized is a highly conductive fluid as is
>>>>>>>>> water.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ^With a background education in Aerodynamics, I studied the
>>>>>>>>> subject as thoroughly as possible an came away with a
>>>>>>>>> different Theory. See:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.mpoweruk.com/flight_theory.htm. Bernoulli's
>>>>>>>>> Principle and Newton's Law of motion do not complete the
>>>>>>>>> puzzle. In wind tunnel testing of airfoils, little turfs of
>>>>>>>>> string are attached at thousands of points on the upper, lift
>>>>>>>>> producing areas of the wing. There is clear evidence that
>>>>>>>>> micro vertices are produced along with the counter vertices
>>>>>>>>> and we get a gross production of the anti-gravitic effects as
>>>>>>>>> we see in the tornado example. See, I told you that this fly's
>>>>>>>>> way outside of mainstream thinking. The more we examine the
>>>>>>>>> evidence, new conclusions spring forth. Thank You Ole for
>>>>>>>>> your question opens a whole new approach into all thing that
>>>>>>>>> perturb the Aether.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 8:40 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Norman,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When looking at a weather map showing the air pressure wind
>>>>>>>>>> speed or temperature as field lines does that really mean
>>>>>>>>>> that air is made up of field lines or just being some
>>>>>>>>>> mathematical construct? What if the air is made up of small
>>>>>>>>>> particles only connected when bouncing into each other. The
>>>>>>>>>> particles then could transfer forces just like electric and
>>>>>>>>>> magnetic fields or gravitational fields. T.J.J. See
>>>>>>>>>> (https://wiki2.org/en/Thomas_Jefferson_Jackson_See) and C.A.
>>>>>>>>>> Bjérknes (https://wiki2.org/en/Carl_Anton_Bjerknes)
>>>>>>>>>> demonstrated that the same laws applied no matter what medium
>>>>>>>>>> was used and thus concluded that there must be some aether
>>>>>>>>>> behaving like gases or liquids. The same conclusion is made
>>>>>>>>>> by the Rhythmodynamics theory: http://mirit.ru/rd_2007en.htm.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Even gravity is united into those kind of theories but still
>>>>>>>>>> missing in classical electromagnetism. Here is a video
>>>>>>>>>> showing levitating objects using sound waves in air: Present:
>>>>>>>>>> "Levitation in a Sound Standing Wave" (11 khz):
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIi5tUupH9c (3:35). Even
>>>>>>>>>> though the sound waves may be described by using field lines
>>>>>>>>>> I don't see this really describing air or sound as being made
>>>>>>>>>> of field lines. It's just a mathematical construct that can
>>>>>>>>>> be broken down to something even smaller. Field lines are
>>>>>>>>>> very useful in describing a field except when the field lines
>>>>>>>>>> become discontinuous at some intersections.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by the
>>>>>>>>>> earth for example. This field is very big. If virtual photons
>>>>>>>>>> can travel all the way around the field in a time shorter
>>>>>>>>>> than planck time, aren't they moving faster than the speed of
>>>>>>>>>> light?" Ah Ha! Super Light, Super luminal velocities."
>>>>>>>>>> This may actually be the case. W.B. Smith couldn't measure
>>>>>>>>>> any delay in the propagation of his tensor beam. His theory
>>>>>>>>>> tells that it carries time along with its length and thus is
>>>>>>>>>> at the same time along its length. What is considered empty
>>>>>>>>>> space by most of science actually has the physical constants
>>>>>>>>>> of permittivity of vacuum and permeability of vacuum as if
>>>>>>>>>> there is still something physical there? The theories that
>>>>>>>>>> take this into account are probably more correct than the
>>>>>>>>>> ones dismissing such facts. According to the theory of
>>>>>>>>>> Rhythmodynamics there are different modes of wave propagation
>>>>>>>>>> like longitudinal waves behaving like transverse waves at
>>>>>>>>>> some distance from the emitters which could be why light and
>>>>>>>>>> other electromagnetic waves are seen as transverse
>>>>>>>>>> electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We may be living in several different densities that
>>>>>>>>>> propagates signals at each their own speed. Glass water air
>>>>>>>>>> and vacuum have each their own density and speed of
>>>>>>>>>> propagating electromagnetic waves. Perhaps there are even
>>>>>>>>>> less densities than the ones we know. John W. Keely claimed
>>>>>>>>>> that this is the case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4gCTmlm5RQ
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:21 PM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lets look at the actual make up of the magnetic flux
>>>>>>>>>>> lines.
>>>>>>>>>>> https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created
>>>>>>>>>>> by the earth for example. This field is very big. If
>>>>>>>>>>> virtual photons can travel all the way around the field
>>>>>>>>>>> in a time shorter than planck time, aren't they moving
>>>>>>>>>>> faster than the speed of light?" Ah Ha! Super Light,
>>>>>>>>>>> Super luminal velocities.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYA0bntrjsk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P-FGw5KUeo&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crfY2vzVMbI&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rst9EcF9ryk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk1cOffTgdk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>> The Best!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 4:55 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You, Bert Pool for this new soc.
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://scienceblog.com/505176/scientists-inch-closer-to-fusion-energy-with-discovery-of-a-process-that-stabilizes-plasmas/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:58 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén wave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> An *Alfvén wave* is a wave that occurs in a plasma
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma> (or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conducting fluid), resulting from the interaction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the magnetic fields and electric currents
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Electric_current>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> within it, causing an oscillation of the ions. Alfvén
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in a letter to the journal /Nature/ in 1942:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise to an E.M.F. which produces electric
>>>>>>>>>>>>> currents. Owing to the magnetic field, these
>>>>>>>>>>>>> currents give mechanical forces which change the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> state of motion of the liquid. Thus a kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> combined electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> produced."^[1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Alfv%C3%A9n_wave#cite_note-alfven1942-1>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén waves initiated the field of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetohydrodynamics
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Magnetohydrodynamics>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which subsequently earned Alfvén a Nobel Prize.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Put some thought behind this statement "A conductive
>>>>>>>>>>>>> liquid"!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please read this mans research and see how he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> often rejected by fellow physicists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:31 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aa.springer.de/papers/7324002/2300449.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still researching the importance of the Alfven waves
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in plasma.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moray, Jon Gentry and Warren asked pertinent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions regarding velocities, magnetic flux etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in plasma events so I did a search as to whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alfven waves have a frequency. This site pretty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well defines a lot of plasma info that we need.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.britannica.com/science/plasma-state-of-matter#ref507092
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:29 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hooper's work looks very compelling. At his time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of experimentation, super conductors were not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reality as they are now. The fact that a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resistance free conductor might accelerate a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> potential's velocity, after going through a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resistor, suggests an analogy to fluid dynamics,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much like Bernuili's principle application of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> venturi to gases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea of dielectric conductors is a mind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smasher, inverting our entire circuit thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Generally, pretty radical concepts, in a zone to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set us up for quantum physics thinking. Whew!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 3:17 PM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question Warren! Nobody really knows how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the potential and current manifest in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conductor passing through a flux field. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question is valid cause there very well may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some sort of reconnect occurring here. Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was, that the flux field was photon stream
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which enabled pairing to produce electrons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attending current. There is still so much that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we don't know but things are getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting. Read that last doc that I posted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it is very enlightening on this subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/temp/x565-hen.htm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is one of Oles favorites.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 9:09 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if, in a down to earth , practical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manner, the connect/re-connect plays a role
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in, for instance, the Kromery, where one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slides the magnets at right angles to their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locked together state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially, I need both hands to grasp the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flywheel to turn my Kromery.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once turning, one finger's friction on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rim, easily rotates the flywheel, regardless
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the load.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too fast, then eddy currents start warming
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the magnetic coil cores.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we cutting those magnetic lines?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 9:25 AM, Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wootan nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://young.caltech.edu/Collisionless_Magnetic_Reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:21 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2017-10-hidden-mechanics-magnetic-field-reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gss.pppl.gov/talks/reconnection%20lecture%201.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-0545-0_14
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Developments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dieter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biskamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Planck-Institut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fiir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plasmaphysik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8046
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Miinchen,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abstract
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> briefly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviews
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> models,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petschek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortcomings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reynolds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small-scale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MHD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turbulence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissipation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collisional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sistivity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decade
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been realized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cosmic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>