Body
I just love some of the answers found on these physics sites. Lol
OOOOOOOOH BOY!!! YOU GON ON TO MAKE A DOOZY OF A WIRL-WIN AIN'TCHA?!?!
https://www.quora.com/What-will-happen-if-two-electrons-collide-Or-in-other-words-can-we-fuse-electrons
On 1/12/2019 3:01 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Jon Gentry sent me this interesting book preview! Take a look:
> https://books.google.com/books?id=Ec6MP26x6J8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
>
> On 1/12/2019 7:19 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Bert Pool and Phil will appreciate this little piece of history of my
>> research into Tesla back in the 70s. Before I met the boys of Ft.
>> Worth Tesla Coil Builders, I called D C Cox and ordered a plan set
>> for my first Tesla Coil. At the time I also asked for plans for a
>> large Van de Graff Generator and got a resounding NO! Cox explained
>> the huge difference between the two systems. In the Van de Graff you
>> are accumulating charge (electrostatic) that when discharged is a
>> multi-million volt discharge (DC) that, if you are grounded, flows
>> through the body and will kill you deader that hell. The Tesla Coil
>> on the other hand is HVAC at high frequency therefore travels over
>> your body (skin effect) and will do no harm since the discharge never
>> penetrates the body. Oh! Take off any metals from your body such as
>> bracelets, rings etc. cause the high freq will cause heating and will
>> burn you. I remember my first visit with Bert and Leslie at his
>> Teslathon at Irving Texas back in the 80s.
>>
>> https://vimeo.com/channels/resonanceresearch
>>
>> https://library.e.abb.com/public/6d17725e73e547d6922c408557562ec4/DC_Resonance%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Hybrid%20HVDC%20System.pdf
>>
>> A note here that is of interest to Angel and Fredric since they are
>> very active in the transmission of HVDC at megawatt levels. Any
>> system that has the basic components of an LC circuit is subject to a
>> resonance effect. So do not say "What, Resonance in a DC
>> circuit"??? The switching will get you every time. Lol Norm
>>
>> On 1/12/2019 6:42 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>> Since it was mentioned in the reddit article:
>>> https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Ultimate_Reality.html?id=ySsNiCPUPecC
>>>
>>> On 1/12/2019 6:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Glad you asked there Mick for almost all of us have our copies of
>>>> Joseph Cater's Book, Awesome Life Force in which he uses the terms
>>>> Hard Electrons vs Soft Electrons. The Scientific Community take a
>>>> dim view of publications such as this BUT teach, even at MIT that
>>>> there are hard vs Soft electrons??
>>>>
>>>> See;
>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/6twjgw/eli5_what_are_soft_and_hard_electrons/
>>>>
>>>> MIT lecture on Superposition:
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ3bPUKo5zc&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> https://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
>>>>
>>>> To sum up this whole argument, this article says it best
>>>> https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-static-and-vs-dynamic-electricity/
>>>> If it is moving (dynamic) they are hard electrons and carry a
>>>> magnetic field and electric field. If they are standing still,
>>>> (no movement) they are Soft Electrons. Moving charges create
>>>> fields. You can charge a large capacitor via an influence machine
>>>> (electrostatic generator) and as long as the charge is at rest
>>>> state, it is static electricity. When you discharge the capacitor,
>>>> the resultant moving of charge (dynamic) creates the fields due to
>>>> moving charge. This is how I see it.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma_classification_(types_of_plasma)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I had a friend, Leonard Dorsett that lived at Grapevine, TX by the
>>>> lake. In the evening, just at dusk, the metal roof of his house
>>>> would glow due to a strange ionization soft plasma. We never
>>>> figured out this phenomenon.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/11/2019 8:09 PM, Mick [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please distill the concept of soft particles? I read
>>>>> the Cater book and for some reason have a disconnect concerning
>>>>> what defines a soft or hard electron etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/11/2019 9:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://physics.tutorcircle.com/modern-physics/pair-production.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/11/2019 7:15 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225697264_A_standing_wave_acoustic_levitation_system_for_large_planar_objects
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ja Brink & John ,"Thanks for your comments"! Since I went to
>>>>>>> Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and am a dual rated aviator
>>>>>>> (rotary wing), I concur with your observation regarding the lift
>>>>>>> multiplication with multiple "counter rotating" rotors for this
>>>>>>> is where the "pair production" of vortices happens which gives
>>>>>>> an order of magnitude gross lift.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having studied the large beetles (Rhinobeetle) it is interesting
>>>>>>> to watch in slow motion video, them first cam forward and
>>>>>>> outward and lock their Elytra (Wing cover shell) "no lift yet",
>>>>>>> then start rotary wing motion which activates the micro cavity
>>>>>>> structure (under side of Elyton) then take off with surprising
>>>>>>> ease! The anomalous lift is induced by the wing motion air
>>>>>>> currents under the shells. "Pure and simple"! Look at the video
>>>>>>> and please note several Elyton (shells) laying on table "cup
>>>>>>> side down" and are not "hovering". They are not "glued down to
>>>>>>> table top" so if the "static" lift theory were valid they could
>>>>>>> not simply lie there motionless! It takes the vortex air
>>>>>>> movement to create the eddy flow which in-turn activates the AG
>>>>>>> effects the same as seen in close proximity tornado vortex eddy
>>>>>>> air flows. Please see shells laying cup side down here:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW6uOW4aoJQ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dallas tornado 2005, semi trailers suspended in mid air!
>>>>>>> (outside of tornado vortex). 53 ft. trailer weighing 12,000 #s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/3/2017 9:52 PM, jabrinka [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>> In the study of flight when using models to determine flight
>>>>>>>> characteristics the models are typically smaller than the
>>>>>>>> aircraft design being studied however the components that make
>>>>>>>> up air remain the same size so... a smaller version will be
>>>>>>>> operating in relatively more dense compressible fluid. This is
>>>>>>>> known as scale effect. When a fish swings its tail to one side
>>>>>>>> a vortex is created as a result. On the return swing the tail
>>>>>>>> has the additional rotary motion (angular momentum) to push
>>>>>>>> against as opposed to a stationary volume of fluid resulting in
>>>>>>>> extra thrust. This explains the increased efficiency of
>>>>>>>> multiple rotors on an aircraft drone or otherwise.
>>>>>>>> On the lungan mousetrap buzzer thread, sometime ago 2007ish on
>>>>>>>> this forum a member Gary (the Skipper ) had a design for a long
>>>>>>>> coil with em/back emf collecting coils along its length. I had
>>>>>>>> almost finished my reproduction when the latest spook showed up
>>>>>>>> with several wild geese for me to chase. Lost my house and
>>>>>>>> havent made another coil yet. The buzzer kickback Norm
>>>>>>>> mentioned spelled out for me how Ron Cole's electric car with
>>>>>>>> all the clicking relays must have worked (before he was
>>>>>>>> disappeared). Evidently grounding to the car frame was enough
>>>>>>>> to make a neutral spike of sorts.. heh....heh. Best to all Ja Brink
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John! Watch this video and pay close attention to the "Bird in
>>>>>>> flight part"! See:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcNGwmV1Yio "Vortex pair
>>>>>>> generation via leading edge feathers" allows bird to land
>>>>>>> "vertically"!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/3/2017 8:45 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John: Sorry! I did not see any evidence of "lift" or
>>>>>>> anti-gravity with "dead bug" parts! What are you referring to
>>>>>>> with the window blind & glue??? I did not see this evidence??
>>>>>>> My "pair production of counter rotating vortices" is a "dynamic
>>>>>>> flow" situation and contend that you do not have evidence of a
>>>>>>> "static" no air flow lift situation! Please show me some
>>>>>>> evidence of a totally "static lift". Sure! the movement of
>>>>>>> "Elytra" on a table top was shown as false due to "electrostatic
>>>>>>> effects". I can walk across a polyester carpet and pick up a
>>>>>>> pair of steel tweasers and make the Elyton move about via
>>>>>>> electrostatic charge! Nothing conclusive here! Show me a Elyton
>>>>>>> hovering in air "static, no air flow" over the table, them I
>>>>>>> will be convinced! Sure there is the "AG" effect when the wings
>>>>>>> of the bug provide the necessary circulating vortex air flow
>>>>>>> within the micro cavities under the Elytra thus giving the
>>>>>>> anomalous lift we all see as evidence that very large bugs,
>>>>>>> rhinobeatles and bumblebees can achieve what the text books
>>>>>>> prove cannot be done. "Fly"!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sometimes it is great to be able to go back and retreive
>>>>>>> messages that are applicable to today's topics.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/11/2019 6:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok! folks, Ole has brought up a very interesting point when
>>>>>>>> comparing the air mass, weather and the phenomenon of
>>>>>>>> levitation, anti-gravity etc. Something that I have been
>>>>>>>> wanting to bring up but the subject is a little far out of the
>>>>>>>> mainstream thinking. Lets look at a profound statement here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alfven quote:"If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives rise to an
>>>>>>>> E.M.F. which produces electric currents. Owing to the magnetic
>>>>>>>> field, these currents give mechanical forces which change the
>>>>>>>> state of motion of the liquid. Thus a kind of combined
>>>>>>>> electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced.^"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ^Back when I posted the articles on electrostatic generators, I
>>>>>>>> had stated that the 9th grade Science Class explanation for the
>>>>>>>> source of the electrons was believed to be a shearing from the
>>>>>>>> air as the device rotated, example Wimshurst Machine. WRONG.
>>>>>>>> I gave you the example of the Felici Electrostatic Generator
>>>>>>>> http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/highvoltage/HVgenerator/HVgenerator.htm
>>>>>>>> Here we have a device that uses pure hydrogen gas at 30 bar
>>>>>>>> pressure as the operating media and produces 2.5 KW at 300KV.
>>>>>>>> CERN is operating an electrostatic generator that has a deep
>>>>>>>> vacuum as the operating media. ?? Ole's example of air is
>>>>>>>> interesting for we have discussed tornadoes and how we observe
>>>>>>>> Anti-gravitic phenomenon at the vortex base due to the counter
>>>>>>>> rotating, vortex-anti vortex eddy currents in which we get the
>>>>>>>> Alfven example of Electromagnetic-hydrodynamics. We see this
>>>>>>>> same example in the Sonodiffuser with the production of the
>>>>>>>> micro cavitation production of vortex-counter vortex producing
>>>>>>>> the photon burst. Air when ionized is a highly conductive
>>>>>>>> fluid as is water.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ^With a background education in Aerodynamics, I studied the
>>>>>>>> subject as thoroughly as possible an came away with a different
>>>>>>>> Theory. See: https://www.mpoweruk.com/flight_theory.htm.
>>>>>>>> Bernoulli's Principle and Newton's Law of motion do not
>>>>>>>> complete the puzzle. In wind tunnel testing of airfoils,
>>>>>>>> little turfs of string are attached at thousands of points on
>>>>>>>> the upper, lift producing areas of the wing. There is clear
>>>>>>>> evidence that micro vertices are produced along with the
>>>>>>>> counter vertices and we get a gross production of the
>>>>>>>> anti-gravitic effects as we see in the tornado example. See, I
>>>>>>>> told you that this fly's way outside of mainstream thinking.
>>>>>>>> The more we examine the evidence, new conclusions spring
>>>>>>>> forth. Thank You Ole for your question opens a whole new
>>>>>>>> approach into all thing that perturb the Aether.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 8:40 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Norman,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When looking at a weather map showing the air pressure wind
>>>>>>>>> speed or temperature as field lines does that really mean that
>>>>>>>>> air is made up of field lines or just being some mathematical
>>>>>>>>> construct? What if the air is made up of small particles only
>>>>>>>>> connected when bouncing into each other. The particles then
>>>>>>>>> could transfer forces just like electric and magnetic fields
>>>>>>>>> or gravitational fields. T.J.J. See
>>>>>>>>> (https://wiki2.org/en/Thomas_Jefferson_Jackson_See) and C.A.
>>>>>>>>> Bjérknes (https://wiki2.org/en/Carl_Anton_Bjerknes)
>>>>>>>>> demonstrated that the same laws applied no matter what medium
>>>>>>>>> was used and thus concluded that there must be some aether
>>>>>>>>> behaving like gases or liquids. The same conclusion is made by
>>>>>>>>> the Rhythmodynamics theory: http://mirit.ru/rd_2007en.htm.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Even gravity is united into those kind of theories but still
>>>>>>>>> missing in classical electromagnetism. Here is a video showing
>>>>>>>>> levitating objects using sound waves in air: Present:
>>>>>>>>> "Levitation in a Sound Standing Wave" (11 khz):
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIi5tUupH9c (3:35). Even
>>>>>>>>> though the sound waves may be described by using field lines I
>>>>>>>>> don't see this really describing air or sound as being made of
>>>>>>>>> field lines. It's just a mathematical construct that can be
>>>>>>>>> broken down to something even smaller. Field lines are very
>>>>>>>>> useful in describing a field except when the field lines
>>>>>>>>> become discontinuous at some intersections.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by the
>>>>>>>>> earth for example. This field is very big. If virtual photons
>>>>>>>>> can travel all the way around the field in a time shorter than
>>>>>>>>> planck time, aren't they moving faster than the speed of
>>>>>>>>> light?" Ah Ha! Super Light, Super luminal velocities."
>>>>>>>>> This may actually be the case. W.B. Smith couldn't measure any
>>>>>>>>> delay in the propagation of his tensor beam. His theory tells
>>>>>>>>> that it carries time along with its length and thus is at the
>>>>>>>>> same time along its length. What is considered empty space by
>>>>>>>>> most of science actually has the physical constants of
>>>>>>>>> permittivity of vacuum and permeability of vacuum as if there
>>>>>>>>> is still something physical there? The theories that take this
>>>>>>>>> into account are probably more correct than the ones
>>>>>>>>> dismissing such facts. According to the theory of
>>>>>>>>> Rhythmodynamics there are different modes of wave propagation
>>>>>>>>> like longitudinal waves behaving like transverse waves at some
>>>>>>>>> distance from the emitters which could be why light and other
>>>>>>>>> electromagnetic waves are seen as transverse electromagnetic
>>>>>>>>> waves.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We may be living in several different densities that
>>>>>>>>> propagates signals at each their own speed. Glass water air
>>>>>>>>> and vacuum have each their own density and speed of
>>>>>>>>> propagating electromagnetic waves. Perhaps there are even less
>>>>>>>>> densities than the ones we know. John W. Keely claimed that
>>>>>>>>> this is the case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4gCTmlm5RQ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:21 PM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lets look at the actual make up of the magnetic flux
>>>>>>>>>> lines. https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created
>>>>>>>>>> by the earth for example. This field is very big. If
>>>>>>>>>> virtual photons can travel all the way around the field
>>>>>>>>>> in a time shorter than planck time, aren't they moving
>>>>>>>>>> faster than the speed of light?" Ah Ha! Super Light,
>>>>>>>>>> Super luminal velocities.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYA0bntrjsk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P-FGw5KUeo&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crfY2vzVMbI&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rst9EcF9ryk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk1cOffTgdk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>> The Best!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 4:55 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You, Bert Pool for this new soc.
>>>>>>>>>>> https://scienceblog.com/505176/scientists-inch-closer-to-fusion-energy-with-discovery-of-a-process-that-stabilizes-plasmas/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:58 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén wave
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> An *Alfvén wave* is a wave that occurs in a plasma
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma> (or conducting
>>>>>>>>>>>> fluid), resulting from the interaction of the magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>> fields and electric currents
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Electric_current>
>>>>>>>>>>>> within it, causing an oscillation of the ions. Alfvén
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in a letter to the journal /Nature/ in 1942:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives
>>>>>>>>>>>> rise to an E.M.F. which produces electric currents.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Owing to the magnetic field, these currents give
>>>>>>>>>>>> mechanical forces which change the state of motion
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the liquid. Thus a kind of combined
>>>>>>>>>>>> electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced."^[1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Alfv%C3%A9n_wave#cite_note-alfven1942-1>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén waves initiated the field of
>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetohydrodynamics
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Magnetohydrodynamics>
>>>>>>>>>>>> which subsequently earned Alfvén a Nobel Prize.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Put some thought behind this statement "A conductive
>>>>>>>>>>>> liquid"!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please read this mans research and see how he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> often rejected by fellow physicists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:31 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aa.springer.de/papers/7324002/2300449.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still researching the importance of the Alfven waves
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in plasma.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moray, Jon Gentry and Warren asked pertinent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions regarding velocities, magnetic flux etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in plasma events so I did a search as to whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alfven waves have a frequency. This site pretty well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defines a lot of plasma info that we need. See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.britannica.com/science/plasma-state-of-matter#ref507092
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:29 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hooper's work looks very compelling. At his time of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimentation, super conductors were not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reality as they are now. The fact that a resistance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free conductor might accelerate a potential's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> velocity, after going through a resistor, suggests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an analogy to fluid dynamics, much like Bernuili's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> principle application of a venturi to gases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea of dielectric conductors is a mind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smasher, inverting our entire circuit thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Generally, pretty radical concepts, in a zone to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set us up for quantum physics thinking. Whew!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 3:17 PM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question Warren! Nobody really knows how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the potential and current manifest in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conductor passing through a flux field. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question is valid cause there very well may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some sort of reconnect occurring here. Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was, that the flux field was photon stream
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which enabled pairing to produce electrons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attending current. There is still so much that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we don't know but things are getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting. Read that last doc that I posted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it is very enlightening on this subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/temp/x565-hen.htm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is one of Oles favorites.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 9:09 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if, in a down to earth , practical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manner, the connect/re-connect plays a role
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in, for instance, the Kromery, where one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slides the magnets at right angles to their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locked together state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially, I need both hands to grasp the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flywheel to turn my Kromery.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once turning, one finger's friction on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rim, easily rotates the flywheel, regardless
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the load.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too fast, then eddy currents start warming the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic coil cores.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we cutting those magnetic lines?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 9:25 AM, Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wootan nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://young.caltech.edu/Collisionless_Magnetic_Reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:21 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2017-10-hidden-mechanics-magnetic-field-reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gss.pppl.gov/talks/reconnection%20lecture%201.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-0545-0_14
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Developments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dieter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biskamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Planck-Institut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fiir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plasmaphysik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8046
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Miinchen,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abstract
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> briefly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviews
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> models,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petschek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortcomings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reynolds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small-scale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MHD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turbulence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissipation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collisional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sistivity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decade
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been realized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cosmic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>