Body
Jon Gentry sent me this interesting book preview! Take a look:
https://books.google.com/books?id=Ec6MP26x6J8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
On 1/12/2019 7:19 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Bert Pool and Phil will appreciate this little piece of history of my
> research into Tesla back in the 70s. Before I met the boys of Ft.
> Worth Tesla Coil Builders, I called D C Cox and ordered a plan set for
> my first Tesla Coil. At the time I also asked for plans for a large
> Van de Graff Generator and got a resounding NO! Cox explained the
> huge difference between the two systems. In the Van de Graff you are
> accumulating charge (electrostatic) that when discharged is a
> multi-million volt discharge (DC) that, if you are grounded, flows
> through the body and will kill you deader that hell. The Tesla Coil on
> the other hand is HVAC at high frequency therefore travels over your
> body (skin effect) and will do no harm since the discharge never
> penetrates the body. Oh! Take off any metals from your body such as
> bracelets, rings etc. cause the high freq will cause heating and will
> burn you. I remember my first visit with Bert and Leslie at his
> Teslathon at Irving Texas back in the 80s.
>
> https://vimeo.com/channels/resonanceresearch
>
> https://library.e.abb.com/public/6d17725e73e547d6922c408557562ec4/DC_Resonance%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Hybrid%20HVDC%20System.pdf
>
> A note here that is of interest to Angel and Fredric since they are
> very active in the transmission of HVDC at megawatt levels. Any
> system that has the basic components of an LC circuit is subject to a
> resonance effect. So do not say "What, Resonance in a DC
> circuit"??? The switching will get you every time. Lol Norm
>
> On 1/12/2019 6:42 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Since it was mentioned in the reddit article:
>> https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Ultimate_Reality.html?id=ySsNiCPUPecC
>>
>> On 1/12/2019 6:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Glad you asked there Mick for almost all of us have our copies of
>>> Joseph Cater's Book, Awesome Life Force in which he uses the terms
>>> Hard Electrons vs Soft Electrons. The Scientific Community take a
>>> dim view of publications such as this BUT teach, even at MIT that
>>> there are hard vs Soft electrons??
>>>
>>> See;
>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/6twjgw/eli5_what_are_soft_and_hard_electrons/
>>>
>>> MIT lecture on Superposition:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ3bPUKo5zc&feature=youtu.be
>>>
>>> https://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
>>>
>>> To sum up this whole argument, this article says it best
>>> https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-static-and-vs-dynamic-electricity/
>>> If it is moving (dynamic) they are hard electrons and carry a
>>> magnetic field and electric field. If they are standing still, (no
>>> movement) they are Soft Electrons. Moving charges create fields.
>>> You can charge a large capacitor via an influence machine
>>> (electrostatic generator) and as long as the charge is at rest
>>> state, it is static electricity. When you discharge the capacitor,
>>> the resultant moving of charge (dynamic) creates the fields due to
>>> moving charge. This is how I see it.
>>>
>>> https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma_classification_(types_of_plasma)
>>>
>>> I had a friend, Leonard Dorsett that lived at Grapevine, TX by the
>>> lake. In the evening, just at dusk, the metal roof of his house
>>> would glow due to a strange ionization soft plasma. We never figured
>>> out this phenomenon.
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2019 8:09 PM, Mick [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Norm,
>>>>
>>>> Could you please distill the concept of soft particles? I read the
>>>> Cater book and for some reason have a disconnect concerning what
>>>> defines a soft or hard electron etc.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Mick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/11/2019 9:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://physics.tutorcircle.com/modern-physics/pair-production.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/11/2019 7:15 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225697264_A_standing_wave_acoustic_levitation_system_for_large_planar_objects
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ja Brink & John ,"Thanks for your comments"! Since I went to
>>>>>> Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and am a dual rated aviator
>>>>>> (rotary wing), I concur with your observation regarding the lift
>>>>>> multiplication with multiple "counter rotating" rotors for this
>>>>>> is where the "pair production" of vortices happens which gives an
>>>>>> order of magnitude gross lift.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Having studied the large beetles (Rhinobeetle) it is interesting
>>>>>> to watch in slow motion video, them first cam forward and outward
>>>>>> and lock their Elytra (Wing cover shell) "no lift yet", then
>>>>>> start rotary wing motion which activates the micro cavity
>>>>>> structure (under side of Elyton) then take off with surprising
>>>>>> ease! The anomalous lift is induced by the wing motion air
>>>>>> currents under the shells. "Pure and simple"! Look at the video
>>>>>> and please note several Elyton (shells) laying on table "cup side
>>>>>> down" and are not "hovering". They are not "glued down to table
>>>>>> top" so if the "static" lift theory were valid they could not
>>>>>> simply lie there motionless! It takes the vortex air movement
>>>>>> to create the eddy flow which in-turn activates the AG effects
>>>>>> the same as seen in close proximity tornado vortex eddy air
>>>>>> flows. Please see shells laying cup side down here:
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW6uOW4aoJQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dallas tornado 2005, semi trailers suspended in mid air!
>>>>>> (outside of tornado vortex). 53 ft. trailer weighing 12,000 #s
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/3/2017 9:52 PM, jabrinka [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>> In the study of flight when using models to determine flight
>>>>>>> characteristics the models are typically smaller than the
>>>>>>> aircraft design being studied however the components that make
>>>>>>> up air remain the same size so... a smaller version will be
>>>>>>> operating in relatively more dense compressible fluid. This is
>>>>>>> known as scale effect. When a fish swings its tail to one side a
>>>>>>> vortex is created as a result. On the return swing the tail has
>>>>>>> the additional rotary motion (angular momentum) to push against
>>>>>>> as opposed to a stationary volume of fluid resulting in extra
>>>>>>> thrust. This explains the increased efficiency of multiple
>>>>>>> rotors on an aircraft drone or otherwise.
>>>>>>> On the lungan mousetrap buzzer thread, sometime ago 2007ish on
>>>>>>> this forum a member Gary (the Skipper ) had a design for a long
>>>>>>> coil with em/back emf collecting coils along its length. I had
>>>>>>> almost finished my reproduction when the latest spook showed up
>>>>>>> with several wild geese for me to chase. Lost my house and
>>>>>>> havent made another coil yet. The buzzer kickback Norm mentioned
>>>>>>> spelled out for me how Ron Cole's electric car with all the
>>>>>>> clicking relays must have worked (before he was disappeared).
>>>>>>> Evidently grounding to the car frame was enough to make a
>>>>>>> neutral spike of sorts.. heh....heh. Best to all Ja Brink
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John! Watch this video and pay close attention to the "Bird in
>>>>>> flight part"! See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcNGwmV1Yio
>>>>>> "Vortex pair generation via leading edge feathers" allows bird
>>>>>> to land "vertically"!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/3/2017 8:45 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John: Sorry! I did not see any evidence of "lift" or anti-gravity
>>>>>> with "dead bug" parts! What are you referring to with the window
>>>>>> blind & glue??? I did not see this evidence?? My "pair
>>>>>> production of counter rotating vortices" is a "dynamic flow"
>>>>>> situation and contend that you do not have evidence of a "static"
>>>>>> no air flow lift situation! Please show me some evidence of a
>>>>>> totally "static lift". Sure! the movement of "Elytra" on a table
>>>>>> top was shown as false due to "electrostatic effects". I can
>>>>>> walk across a polyester carpet and pick up a pair of steel
>>>>>> tweasers and make the Elyton move about via electrostatic charge!
>>>>>> Nothing conclusive here! Show me a Elyton hovering in air
>>>>>> "static, no air flow" over the table, them I will be convinced!
>>>>>> Sure there is the "AG" effect when the wings of the bug provide
>>>>>> the necessary circulating vortex air flow within the micro
>>>>>> cavities under the Elytra thus giving the anomalous lift we all
>>>>>> see as evidence that very large bugs, rhinobeatles and bumblebees
>>>>>> can achieve what the text books prove cannot be done. "Fly"!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sometimes it is great to be able to go back and retreive messages
>>>>>> that are applicable to today's topics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/11/2019 6:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok! folks, Ole has brought up a very interesting point when
>>>>>>> comparing the air mass, weather and the phenomenon of
>>>>>>> levitation, anti-gravity etc. Something that I have been wanting
>>>>>>> to bring up but the subject is a little far out of the
>>>>>>> mainstream thinking. Lets look at a profound statement here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alfven quote:"If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives rise to an
>>>>>>> E.M.F. which produces electric currents. Owing to the magnetic
>>>>>>> field, these currents give mechanical forces which change the
>>>>>>> state of motion of the liquid. Thus a kind of combined
>>>>>>> electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced.^"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ^Back when I posted the articles on electrostatic generators, I
>>>>>>> had stated that the 9th grade Science Class explanation for the
>>>>>>> source of the electrons was believed to be a shearing from the
>>>>>>> air as the device rotated, example Wimshurst Machine. WRONG. I
>>>>>>> gave you the example of the Felici Electrostatic Generator
>>>>>>> http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/highvoltage/HVgenerator/HVgenerator.htm
>>>>>>> Here we have a device that uses pure hydrogen gas at 30 bar
>>>>>>> pressure as the operating media and produces 2.5 KW at 300KV.
>>>>>>> CERN is operating an electrostatic generator that has a deep
>>>>>>> vacuum as the operating media. ?? Ole's example of air is
>>>>>>> interesting for we have discussed tornadoes and how we observe
>>>>>>> Anti-gravitic phenomenon at the vortex base due to the counter
>>>>>>> rotating, vortex-anti vortex eddy currents in which we get the
>>>>>>> Alfven example of Electromagnetic-hydrodynamics. We see this
>>>>>>> same example in the Sonodiffuser with the production of the
>>>>>>> micro cavitation production of vortex-counter vortex producing
>>>>>>> the photon burst. Air when ionized is a highly conductive
>>>>>>> fluid as is water.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ^With a background education in Aerodynamics, I studied the
>>>>>>> subject as thoroughly as possible an came away with a different
>>>>>>> Theory. See: https://www.mpoweruk.com/flight_theory.htm.
>>>>>>> Bernoulli's Principle and Newton's Law of motion do not complete
>>>>>>> the puzzle. In wind tunnel testing of airfoils, little turfs of
>>>>>>> string are attached at thousands of points on the upper, lift
>>>>>>> producing areas of the wing. There is clear evidence that micro
>>>>>>> vertices are produced along with the counter vertices and we get
>>>>>>> a gross production of the anti-gravitic effects as we see in the
>>>>>>> tornado example. See, I told you that this fly's way outside of
>>>>>>> mainstream thinking. The more we examine the evidence, new
>>>>>>> conclusions spring forth. Thank You Ole for your question
>>>>>>> opens a whole new approach into all thing that perturb the Aether.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 8:40 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Norman,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When looking at a weather map showing the air pressure wind
>>>>>>>> speed or temperature as field lines does that really mean that
>>>>>>>> air is made up of field lines or just being some mathematical
>>>>>>>> construct? What if the air is made up of small particles only
>>>>>>>> connected when bouncing into each other. The particles then
>>>>>>>> could transfer forces just like electric and magnetic fields or
>>>>>>>> gravitational fields. T.J.J. See
>>>>>>>> (https://wiki2.org/en/Thomas_Jefferson_Jackson_See) and C.A.
>>>>>>>> Bjérknes (https://wiki2.org/en/Carl_Anton_Bjerknes)
>>>>>>>> demonstrated that the same laws applied no matter what medium
>>>>>>>> was used and thus concluded that there must be some aether
>>>>>>>> behaving like gases or liquids. The same conclusion is made by
>>>>>>>> the Rhythmodynamics theory: http://mirit.ru/rd_2007en.htm.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even gravity is united into those kind of theories but still
>>>>>>>> missing in classical electromagnetism. Here is a video showing
>>>>>>>> levitating objects using sound waves in air: Present:
>>>>>>>> "Levitation in a Sound Standing Wave" (11 khz):
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIi5tUupH9c (3:35). Even though
>>>>>>>> the sound waves may be described by using field lines I don't
>>>>>>>> see this really describing air or sound as being made of field
>>>>>>>> lines. It's just a mathematical construct that can be broken
>>>>>>>> down to something even smaller. Field lines are very useful in
>>>>>>>> describing a field except when the field lines become
>>>>>>>> discontinuous at some intersections.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by the
>>>>>>>> earth for example. This field is very big. If virtual photons
>>>>>>>> can travel all the way around the field in a time shorter than
>>>>>>>> planck time, aren't they moving faster than the speed of
>>>>>>>> light?" Ah Ha! Super Light, Super luminal velocities."
>>>>>>>> This may actually be the case. W.B. Smith couldn't measure any
>>>>>>>> delay in the propagation of his tensor beam. His theory tells
>>>>>>>> that it carries time along with its length and thus is at the
>>>>>>>> same time along its length. What is considered empty space by
>>>>>>>> most of science actually has the physical constants of
>>>>>>>> permittivity of vacuum and permeability of vacuum as if there
>>>>>>>> is still something physical there? The theories that take this
>>>>>>>> into account are probably more correct than the ones dismissing
>>>>>>>> such facts. According to the theory of Rhythmodynamics there
>>>>>>>> are different modes of wave propagation like longitudinal waves
>>>>>>>> behaving like transverse waves at some distance from the
>>>>>>>> emitters which could be why light and other electromagnetic
>>>>>>>> waves are seen as transverse electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We may be living in several different densities that propagates
>>>>>>>> signals at each their own speed. Glass water air and vacuum
>>>>>>>> have each their own density and speed of propagating
>>>>>>>> electromagnetic waves. Perhaps there are even less densities
>>>>>>>> than the ones we know. John W. Keely claimed that this is the case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4gCTmlm5RQ
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:21 PM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lets look at the actual make up of the magnetic flux
>>>>>>>>> lines. https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by
>>>>>>>>> the earth for example. This field is very big. If virtual
>>>>>>>>> photons can travel all the way around the field in a time
>>>>>>>>> shorter than planck time, aren't they moving faster than
>>>>>>>>> the speed of light?" Ah Ha! Super Light, Super luminal
>>>>>>>>> velocities.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYA0bntrjsk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P-FGw5KUeo&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crfY2vzVMbI&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rst9EcF9ryk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk1cOffTgdk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>> The Best!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 4:55 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank You, Bert Pool for this new soc.
>>>>>>>>>> https://scienceblog.com/505176/scientists-inch-closer-to-fusion-energy-with-discovery-of-a-process-that-stabilizes-plasmas/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:58 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén wave
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> An *Alfvén wave* is a wave that occurs in a plasma
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma> (or conducting
>>>>>>>>>>> fluid), resulting from the interaction of the magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>> fields and electric currents
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Electric_current>
>>>>>>>>>>> within it, causing an oscillation of the ions. Alfvén
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in a letter to the journal /Nature/ in 1942:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives
>>>>>>>>>>> rise to an E.M.F. which produces electric currents.
>>>>>>>>>>> Owing to the magnetic field, these currents give
>>>>>>>>>>> mechanical forces which change the state of motion
>>>>>>>>>>> of the liquid. Thus a kind of combined
>>>>>>>>>>> electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced."^[1]
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Alfv%C3%A9n_wave#cite_note-alfven1942-1>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén waves initiated the field of magnetohydrodynamics
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Magnetohydrodynamics>
>>>>>>>>>>> which subsequently earned Alfvén a Nobel Prize.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Put some thought behind this statement "A conductive
>>>>>>>>>>> liquid"!!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n Please
>>>>>>>>>>>> read this mans research and see how he was often
>>>>>>>>>>>> rejected by fellow physicists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:31 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aa.springer.de/papers/7324002/2300449.pdf Still
>>>>>>>>>>>>> researching the importance of the Alfven waves in plasma.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moray, Jon Gentry and Warren asked pertinent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions regarding velocities, magnetic flux etc. in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plasma events so I did a search as to whether Alfven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waves have a frequency. This site pretty well defines
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of plasma info that we need. See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.britannica.com/science/plasma-state-of-matter#ref507092
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:29 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hooper's work looks very compelling. At his time of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimentation, super conductors were not a reality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as they are now. The fact that a resistance free
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conductor might accelerate a potential's velocity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after going through a resistor, suggests an analogy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to fluid dynamics, much like Bernuili's principle
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of a venturi to gases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea of dielectric conductors is a mind smasher,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inverting our entire circuit thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Generally, pretty radical concepts, in a zone to set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us up for quantum physics thinking. Whew!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 3:17 PM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question Warren! Nobody really knows how
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the potential and current manifest in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conductor passing through a flux field. Your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question is valid cause there very well may be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some sort of reconnect occurring here. Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was, that the flux field was photon stream which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled pairing to produce electrons and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attending current. There is still so much that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we don't know but things are getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting. Read that last doc that I posted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for it is very enlightening on this subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/temp/x565-hen.htm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is one of Oles favorites.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 9:09 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if, in a down to earth , practical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manner, the connect/re-connect plays a role in,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for instance, the Kromery, where one slides the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnets at right angles to their locked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> together state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially, I need both hands to grasp the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flywheel to turn my Kromery.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once turning, one finger's friction on the rim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily rotates the flywheel, regardless of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> load.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too fast, then eddy currents start warming the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic coil cores.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we cutting those magnetic lines?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 9:25 AM, Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wootan nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://young.caltech.edu/Collisionless_Magnetic_Reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:21 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2017-10-hidden-mechanics-magnetic-field-reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gss.pppl.gov/talks/reconnection%20lecture%201.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-0545-0_14
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Developments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dieter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biskamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Planck-Institut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fiir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plasmaphysik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8046
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Miinchen,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abstract
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> briefly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviews
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> models,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petschek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortcomings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reynolds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small-scale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MHD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turbulence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissipation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collisional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sistivity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decade
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been realized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cosmic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>