Body
Hi Norman,
Don't be too sure that there is such a thing as static electricity. It may look static but the charges may actually be moving at signal speed but opposing each other to look like a static field. Ivor Catt's theory C tells that the charges always have to be on their move. Wilbert B. Smith's theory tells that electrons and positrons cannot exist without being on the move. An analogy can be made by using smoke rings which have some of the same properties as electrons and positrons. Try to stop a smoke ring and it just disintegrates.
Citing Ivor Catt from here http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/965.htm http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/965.htm:
"We are driving towards the principle that Energy (current) E x H cannot stand still; it can only travel at the speed of light. Any apparently steady field is a combination of two energy currents travelling in opposite directions at the speed of light.
Ivor Catt 6 May 2012"
Article about the experiment done by Tony Wakefield that confirmed Ivor Catt's theory C:
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf
And a succeeding experiment (Experiment to complement the Wakefield Experiment. Suggested by 4
students at Newcastle University UK.): http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x3a922.pdf http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x3a922.pdf
"The Wakefield Experiments Background and Motivation:" http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryricker/2015/12/12/the-wakefield-experiments-background-and-motivation/ http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryricker/2015/12/12/the-wakefield-experiments-background-and-motivation/
The problem is if nature is right and the experiments show how nature works or if theory is right and nature must follow theory even though it doesn't always do so. But even us humans violate laws and perhaps nature isn't different in that way or it is just ruled by its own laws.
Regards
Ole
Strange. Show message history doesn't work so copy pasted some in:
On 1/12/2019 7:28 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@... mailto:nwootan@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
Glad you asked there Mick for almost all of us have our copies of Joseph Cater's Book, Awesome Life Force in which he uses the terms Hard Electrons vs Soft Electrons. The Scientific Community take a dim view of publications such as this BUT teach, even at MIT that there are hard vs Soft electrons??
See; https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/6twjgw/eli5_what_are_soft_and_hard_electrons/ https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/6twjgw/eli5_what_are_soft_and_hard_electrons/
MIT lecture on Superposition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ3bPUKo5zc&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ3bPUKo5zc&feature=youtu.be
https://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field https://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
To sum up this whole argument, this article says it best https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-static-and-vs-dynamic-electricity/ https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-static-and-vs-dynamic-electricity/ If it is moving (dynamic) they are hard electrons and carry a magnetic field and electric field. If they are standing still, (no movement) they are Soft Electrons. Moving charges create fields. You can charge a large capacitor via an influence machine (electrostatic generator) and as long as the charge is at rest state, it is static electricity. When you discharge the capacitor, the resultant moving of charge (dynamic) creates the fields due to moving charge. This is how I see it.
https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma_classification_(types_of_plasma) https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma_classification_(types_of_plasma)
I had a friend, Leonard Dorsett that lived at Grapevine, TX by the lake. In the evening, just at dusk, the metal roof of his house would glow due to a strange ionization soft plasma. We never figured out this phenomenon.
On 1/11/2019 8:09 PM, Mick mkjekyll@... mailto:mkjekyll@... wrote:
Hide message history
Norm,
Could you please distill the concept of soft particles? I read the Cater book and for some reason have a disconnect concerning what defines a soft or hard electron etc.
Thanks,
Mick