Body
Bert Pool and Phil will appreciate this little piece of history of my
research into Tesla back in the 70s. Before I met the boys of Ft. Worth
Tesla Coil Builders, I called D C Cox and ordered a plan set for my
first Tesla Coil. At the time I also asked for plans for a large Van de
Graff Generator and got a resounding NO! Cox explained the huge
difference between the two systems. In the Van de Graff you are
accumulating charge (electrostatic) that when discharged is a
multi-million volt discharge (DC) that, if you are grounded, flows
through the body and will kill you deader that hell. The Tesla Coil on
the other hand is HVAC at high frequency therefore travels over your
body (skin effect) and will do no harm since the discharge never
penetrates the body. Oh! Take off any metals from your body such as
bracelets, rings etc. cause the high freq will cause heating and will
burn you. I remember my first visit with Bert and Leslie at his
Teslathon at Irving Texas back in the 80s.
https://vimeo.com/channels/resonanceresearch
https://library.e.abb.com/public/6d17725e73e547d6922c408557562ec4/DC_Resonance%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Hybrid%20HVDC%20System.pdf
A note here that is of interest to Angel and Fredric since they are very
active in the transmission of HVDC at megawatt levels. Any system that
has the basic components of an LC circuit is subject to a resonance
effect. So do not say "What, Resonance in a DC circuit"??? The
switching will get you every time. Lol Norm
On 1/12/2019 6:42 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Since it was mentioned in the reddit article:
> https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Ultimate_Reality.html?id=ySsNiCPUPecC
>
> On 1/12/2019 6:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Glad you asked there Mick for almost all of us have our copies of
>> Joseph Cater's Book, Awesome Life Force in which he uses the terms
>> Hard Electrons vs Soft Electrons. The Scientific Community take a
>> dim view of publications such as this BUT teach, even at MIT that
>> there are hard vs Soft electrons??
>>
>> See;
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/6twjgw/eli5_what_are_soft_and_hard_electrons/
>>
>> MIT lecture on Superposition:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ3bPUKo5zc&feature=youtu.be
>>
>> https://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
>>
>> To sum up this whole argument, this article says it best
>> https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-static-and-vs-dynamic-electricity/
>> If it is moving (dynamic) they are hard electrons and carry a
>> magnetic field and electric field. If they are standing still, (no
>> movement) they are Soft Electrons. Moving charges create fields.
>> You can charge a large capacitor via an influence machine
>> (electrostatic generator) and as long as the charge is at rest state,
>> it is static electricity. When you discharge the capacitor, the
>> resultant moving of charge (dynamic) creates the fields due to moving
>> charge. This is how I see it.
>>
>> https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma_classification_(types_of_plasma)
>>
>> I had a friend, Leonard Dorsett that lived at Grapevine, TX by the
>> lake. In the evening, just at dusk, the metal roof of his house would
>> glow due to a strange ionization soft plasma. We never figured out
>> this phenomenon.
>>
>> On 1/11/2019 8:09 PM, Mick [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> Could you please distill the concept of soft particles? I read the
>>> Cater book and for some reason have a disconnect concerning what
>>> defines a soft or hard electron etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2019 9:28 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://physics.tutorcircle.com/modern-physics/pair-production.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/11/2019 7:15 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225697264_A_standing_wave_acoustic_levitation_system_for_large_planar_objects
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ja Brink & John ,"Thanks for your comments"! Since I went to
>>>>> Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and am a dual rated aviator
>>>>> (rotary wing), I concur with your observation regarding the lift
>>>>> multiplication with multiple "counter rotating" rotors for this is
>>>>> where the "pair production" of vortices happens which gives an
>>>>> order of magnitude gross lift.
>>>>>
>>>>> Having studied the large beetles (Rhinobeetle) it is interesting
>>>>> to watch in slow motion video, them first cam forward and outward
>>>>> and lock their Elytra (Wing cover shell) "no lift yet", then
>>>>> start rotary wing motion which activates the micro cavity
>>>>> structure (under side of Elyton) then take off with surprising
>>>>> ease! The anomalous lift is induced by the wing motion air
>>>>> currents under the shells. "Pure and simple"! Look at the video
>>>>> and please note several Elyton (shells) laying on table "cup side
>>>>> down" and are not "hovering". They are not "glued down to table
>>>>> top" so if the "static" lift theory were valid they could not
>>>>> simply lie there motionless! It takes the vortex air movement to
>>>>> create the eddy flow which in-turn activates the AG effects the
>>>>> same as seen in close proximity tornado vortex eddy air flows.
>>>>> Please see shells laying cup side down here:
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW6uOW4aoJQ
>>>>>
>>>>> Dallas tornado 2005, semi trailers suspended in mid air! (outside
>>>>> of tornado vortex). 53 ft. trailer weighing 12,000 #s
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/3/2017 9:52 PM, jabrinka [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>> In the study of flight when using models to determine flight
>>>>>> characteristics the models are typically smaller than the
>>>>>> aircraft design being studied however the components that make up
>>>>>> air remain the same size so... a smaller version will be
>>>>>> operating in relatively more dense compressible fluid. This is
>>>>>> known as scale effect. When a fish swings its tail to one side a
>>>>>> vortex is created as a result. On the return swing the tail has
>>>>>> the additional rotary motion (angular momentum) to push against
>>>>>> as opposed to a stationary volume of fluid resulting in extra
>>>>>> thrust. This explains the increased efficiency of multiple rotors
>>>>>> on an aircraft drone or otherwise.
>>>>>> On the lungan mousetrap buzzer thread, sometime ago 2007ish on
>>>>>> this forum a member Gary (the Skipper ) had a design for a long
>>>>>> coil with em/back emf collecting coils along its length. I had
>>>>>> almost finished my reproduction when the latest spook showed up
>>>>>> with several wild geese for me to chase. Lost my house and havent
>>>>>> made another coil yet. The buzzer kickback Norm mentioned spelled
>>>>>> out for me how Ron Cole's electric car with all the clicking
>>>>>> relays must have worked (before he was disappeared). Evidently
>>>>>> grounding to the car frame was enough to make a neutral spike of
>>>>>> sorts.. heh....heh. Best to all Ja Brink
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John! Watch this video and pay close attention to the "Bird in
>>>>> flight part"! See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcNGwmV1Yio
>>>>> "Vortex pair generation via leading edge feathers" allows bird to
>>>>> land "vertically"!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/3/2017 8:45 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> John: Sorry! I did not see any evidence of "lift" or anti-gravity
>>>>> with "dead bug" parts! What are you referring to with the window
>>>>> blind & glue??? I did not see this evidence?? My "pair production
>>>>> of counter rotating vortices" is a "dynamic flow" situation and
>>>>> contend that you do not have evidence of a "static" no air flow
>>>>> lift situation! Please show me some evidence of a totally "static
>>>>> lift". Sure! the movement of "Elytra" on a table top was shown as
>>>>> false due to "electrostatic effects". I can walk across a
>>>>> polyester carpet and pick up a pair of steel tweasers and make the
>>>>> Elyton move about via electrostatic charge! Nothing conclusive
>>>>> here! Show me a Elyton hovering in air "static, no air flow" over
>>>>> the table, them I will be convinced! Sure there is the "AG"
>>>>> effect when the wings of the bug provide the necessary circulating
>>>>> vortex air flow within the micro cavities under the Elytra thus
>>>>> giving the anomalous lift we all see as evidence that very large
>>>>> bugs, rhinobeatles and bumblebees can achieve what the text books
>>>>> prove cannot be done. "Fly"!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes it is great to be able to go back and retreive messages
>>>>> that are applicable to today's topics.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/11/2019 6:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok! folks, Ole has brought up a very interesting point when
>>>>>> comparing the air mass, weather and the phenomenon of levitation,
>>>>>> anti-gravity etc. Something that I have been wanting to bring up
>>>>>> but the subject is a little far out of the mainstream thinking.
>>>>>> Lets look at a profound statement here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alfven quote:"If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives rise to an
>>>>>> E.M.F. which produces electric currents. Owing to the magnetic
>>>>>> field, these currents give mechanical forces which change the
>>>>>> state of motion of the liquid. Thus a kind of combined
>>>>>> electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced.^"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^Back when I posted the articles on electrostatic generators, I
>>>>>> had stated that the 9th grade Science Class explanation for the
>>>>>> source of the electrons was believed to be a shearing from the
>>>>>> air as the device rotated, example Wimshurst Machine. WRONG. I
>>>>>> gave you the example of the Felici Electrostatic Generator
>>>>>> http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/highvoltage/HVgenerator/HVgenerator.htm
>>>>>> Here we have a device that uses pure hydrogen gas at 30 bar
>>>>>> pressure as the operating media and produces 2.5 KW at 300KV.
>>>>>> CERN is operating an electrostatic generator that has a deep
>>>>>> vacuum as the operating media. ?? Ole's example of air is
>>>>>> interesting for we have discussed tornadoes and how we observe
>>>>>> Anti-gravitic phenomenon at the vortex base due to the counter
>>>>>> rotating, vortex-anti vortex eddy currents in which we get the
>>>>>> Alfven example of Electromagnetic-hydrodynamics. We see this
>>>>>> same example in the Sonodiffuser with the production of the micro
>>>>>> cavitation production of vortex-counter vortex producing the
>>>>>> photon burst. Air when ionized is a highly conductive fluid
>>>>>> as is water.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ^With a background education in Aerodynamics, I studied the
>>>>>> subject as thoroughly as possible an came away with a different
>>>>>> Theory. See: https://www.mpoweruk.com/flight_theory.htm.
>>>>>> Bernoulli's Principle and Newton's Law of motion do not complete
>>>>>> the puzzle. In wind tunnel testing of airfoils, little turfs of
>>>>>> string are attached at thousands of points on the upper, lift
>>>>>> producing areas of the wing. There is clear evidence that micro
>>>>>> vertices are produced along with the counter vertices and we get
>>>>>> a gross production of the anti-gravitic effects as we see in the
>>>>>> tornado example. See, I told you that this fly's way outside of
>>>>>> mainstream thinking. The more we examine the evidence, new
>>>>>> conclusions spring forth. Thank You Ole for your question opens
>>>>>> a whole new approach into all thing that perturb the Aether.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 8:40 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Norman,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When looking at a weather map showing the air pressure wind
>>>>>>> speed or temperature as field lines does that really mean that
>>>>>>> air is made up of field lines or just being some mathematical
>>>>>>> construct? What if the air is made up of small particles only
>>>>>>> connected when bouncing into each other. The particles then
>>>>>>> could transfer forces just like electric and magnetic fields or
>>>>>>> gravitational fields. T.J.J. See
>>>>>>> (https://wiki2.org/en/Thomas_Jefferson_Jackson_See) and C.A.
>>>>>>> Bjérknes (https://wiki2.org/en/Carl_Anton_Bjerknes) demonstrated
>>>>>>> that the same laws applied no matter what medium was used and
>>>>>>> thus concluded that there must be some aether behaving like
>>>>>>> gases or liquids. The same conclusion is made by the
>>>>>>> Rhythmodynamics theory: http://mirit.ru/rd_2007en.htm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even gravity is united into those kind of theories but still
>>>>>>> missing in classical electromagnetism. Here is a video showing
>>>>>>> levitating objects using sound waves in air: Present:
>>>>>>> "Levitation in a Sound Standing Wave" (11 khz):
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIi5tUupH9c (3:35). Even though
>>>>>>> the sound waves may be described by using field lines I don't
>>>>>>> see this really describing air or sound as being made of field
>>>>>>> lines. It's just a mathematical construct that can be broken
>>>>>>> down to something even smaller. Field lines are very useful in
>>>>>>> describing a field except when the field lines become
>>>>>>> discontinuous at some intersections.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by the
>>>>>>> earth for example. This field is very big. If virtual photons
>>>>>>> can travel all the way around the field in a time shorter than
>>>>>>> planck time, aren't they moving faster than the speed of light?"
>>>>>>> Ah Ha! Super Light, Super luminal velocities."
>>>>>>> This may actually be the case. W.B. Smith couldn't measure any
>>>>>>> delay in the propagation of his tensor beam. His theory tells
>>>>>>> that it carries time along with its length and thus is at the
>>>>>>> same time along its length. What is considered empty space by
>>>>>>> most of science actually has the physical constants of
>>>>>>> permittivity of vacuum and permeability of vacuum as if there is
>>>>>>> still something physical there? The theories that take this into
>>>>>>> account are probably more correct than the ones dismissing such
>>>>>>> facts. According to the theory of Rhythmodynamics there are
>>>>>>> different modes of wave propagation like longitudinal waves
>>>>>>> behaving like transverse waves at some distance from the
>>>>>>> emitters which could be why light and other electromagnetic
>>>>>>> waves are seen as transverse electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We may be living in several different densities that propagates
>>>>>>> signals at each their own speed. Glass water air and vacuum have
>>>>>>> each their own density and speed of propagating electromagnetic
>>>>>>> waves. Perhaps there are even less densities than the ones we
>>>>>>> know. John W. Keely claimed that this is the case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Ole
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4gCTmlm5RQ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:21 PM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lets look at the actual make up of the magnetic flux lines.
>>>>>>>> https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>>>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by
>>>>>>>> the earth for example. This field is very big. If virtual
>>>>>>>> photons can travel all the way around the field in a time
>>>>>>>> shorter than planck time, aren't they moving faster than
>>>>>>>> the speed of light?" Ah Ha! Super Light, Super luminal
>>>>>>>> velocities.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYA0bntrjsk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P-FGw5KUeo&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crfY2vzVMbI&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rst9EcF9ryk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk1cOffTgdk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>> The Best!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 4:55 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank You, Bert Pool for this new soc.
>>>>>>>>> https://scienceblog.com/505176/scientists-inch-closer-to-fusion-energy-with-discovery-of-a-process-that-stabilizes-plasmas/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:58 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén wave
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> An *Alfvén wave* is a wave that occurs in a plasma
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma> (or conducting
>>>>>>>>>> fluid), resulting from the interaction of the magnetic
>>>>>>>>>> fields and electric currents
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Electric_current> within
>>>>>>>>>> it, causing an oscillation of the ions. Alfvén wrote in a
>>>>>>>>>> letter to the journal /Nature/ in 1942:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant
>>>>>>>>>> magnetic field, every motion of the liquid gives rise
>>>>>>>>>> to an E.M.F. which produces electric currents. Owing
>>>>>>>>>> to the magnetic field, these currents give mechanical
>>>>>>>>>> forces which change the state of motion of the
>>>>>>>>>> liquid. Thus a kind of combined
>>>>>>>>>> electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced."^[1]
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Alfv%C3%A9n_wave#cite_note-alfven1942-1>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alfvén waves initiated the field of magnetohydrodynamics
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Magnetohydrodynamics>
>>>>>>>>>> which subsequently earned Alfvén a Nobel Prize.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Put some thought behind this statement "A conductive
>>>>>>>>>> liquid"!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n Please
>>>>>>>>>>> read this mans research and see how he was often
>>>>>>>>>>> rejected by fellow physicists.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:31 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://aa.springer.de/papers/7324002/2300449.pdf Still
>>>>>>>>>>>> researching the importance of the Alfven waves in plasma.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moray, Jon Gentry and Warren asked pertinent questions
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding velocities, magnetic flux etc. in plasma
>>>>>>>>>>>>> events so I did a search as to whether Alfven waves
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a frequency. This site pretty well defines a lot
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of plasma info that we need. See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.britannica.com/science/plasma-state-of-matter#ref507092
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:29 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hooper's work looks very compelling. At his time of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimentation, super conductors were not a reality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as they are now. The fact that a resistance free
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conductor might accelerate a potential's velocity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after going through a resistor, suggests an analogy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to fluid dynamics, much like Bernuili's principle
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of a venturi to gases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The idea of dielectric conductors is a mind smasher,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inverting our entire circuit thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Generally, pretty radical concepts, in a zone to set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us up for quantum physics thinking. Whew!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 3:17 PM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question Warren! Nobody really knows how the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> potential and current manifest in the conductor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passing through a flux field. Your question is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid cause there very well may be some sort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnect occurring here. Theory was, that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flux field was photon stream which enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pairing to produce electrons and attending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current. There is still so much that we don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know but things are getting interesting. Read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that last doc that I posted for it is very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enlightening on this subject. See:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/temp/x565-hen.htm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is one of Oles favorites.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 9:09 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if, in a down to earth , practical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manner, the connect/re-connect plays a role in,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for instance, the Kromery, where one slides the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnets at right angles to their locked together
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially, I need both hands to grasp the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flywheel to turn my Kromery.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once turning, one finger's friction on the rim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> easily rotates the flywheel, regardless of the load.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too fast, then eddy currents start warming the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic coil cores.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we cutting those magnetic lines?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 9:25 AM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://young.caltech.edu/Collisionless_Magnetic_Reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:21 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2017-10-hidden-mechanics-magnetic-field-reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gss.pppl.gov/talks/reconnection%20lecture%201.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-0545-0_14
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Developments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dieter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biskamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Planck-Institut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fiir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plasmaphysik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8046
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Miinchen,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abstract
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> briefly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviews
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> models,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petschek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortcomings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reynolds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small-scale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MHD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turbulence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissipation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collisional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sistivity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decade
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been realized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cosmic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>