Body
http://physics.tutorcircle.com/modern-physics/pair-production.html
On 1/11/2019 7:15 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225697264_A_standing_wave_acoustic_levitation_system_for_large_planar_objects
>
>
> Ja Brink & John ,"Thanks for your comments"! Since I went to
> Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and am a dual rated aviator
> (rotary wing), I concur with your observation regarding the lift
> multiplication with multiple "counter rotating" rotors for this is
> where the "pair production" of vortices happens which gives an order
> of magnitude gross lift.
>
> Having studied the large beetles (Rhinobeetle) it is interesting to
> watch in slow motion video, them first cam forward and outward and
> lock their Elytra (Wing cover shell) "no lift yet", then start rotary
> wing motion which activates the micro cavity structure (under side of
> Elyton) then take off with surprising ease! The anomalous lift is
> induced by the wing motion air currents under the shells. "Pure and
> simple"! Look at the video and please note several Elyton (shells)
> laying on table "cup side down" and are not "hovering". They are not
> "glued down to table top" so if the "static" lift theory were valid
> they could not simply lie there motionless! It takes the vortex air
> movement to create the eddy flow which in-turn activates the AG
> effects the same as seen in close proximity tornado vortex eddy air
> flows. Please see shells laying cup side down here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW6uOW4aoJQ
>
> Dallas tornado 2005, semi trailers suspended in mid air! (outside of
> tornado vortex). 53 ft. trailer weighing 12,000 #s
>
>
> On 4/3/2017 9:52 PM, jabrinka [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>> In the study of flight when using models to determine flight
>> characteristics the models are typically smaller than the aircraft
>> design being studied however the components that make up air remain
>> the same size so... a smaller version will be operating in relatively
>> more dense compressible fluid. This is known as scale effect. When a
>> fish swings its tail to one side a vortex is created as a result. On
>> the return swing the tail has the additional rotary motion (angular
>> momentum) to push against as opposed to a stationary volume of fluid
>> resulting in extra thrust. This explains the increased efficiency of
>> multiple rotors on an aircraft drone or otherwise.
>> On the lungan mousetrap buzzer thread, sometime ago 2007ish on this
>> forum a member Gary (the Skipper ) had a design for a long coil with
>> em/back emf collecting coils along its length. I had almost finished
>> my reproduction when the latest spook showed up with several wild
>> geese for me to chase. Lost my house and havent made another coil
>> yet. The buzzer kickback Norm mentioned spelled out for me how Ron
>> Cole's electric car with all the clicking relays must have worked
>> (before he was disappeared). Evidently grounding to the car frame was
>> enough to make a neutral spike of sorts.. heh....heh. Best to all Ja
>> Brink
>>
>
> John! Watch this video and pay close attention to the "Bird in flight
> part"! See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcNGwmV1Yio "Vortex
> pair generation via leading edge feathers" allows bird to land
> "vertically"!
>
>
> On 4/3/2017 8:45 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> John: Sorry! I did not see any evidence of "lift" or anti-gravity with
> "dead bug" parts! What are you referring to with the window blind &
> glue??? I did not see this evidence?? My "pair production of counter
> rotating vortices" is a "dynamic flow" situation and contend that you
> do not have evidence of a "static" no air flow lift situation! Please
> show me some evidence of a totally "static lift". Sure! the movement
> of "Elytra" on a table top was shown as false due to "electrostatic
> effects". I can walk across a polyester carpet and pick up a pair of
> steel tweasers and make the Elyton move about via electrostatic
> charge! Nothing conclusive here! Show me a Elyton hovering in air
> "static, no air flow" over the table, them I will be convinced! Sure
> there is the "AG" effect when the wings of the bug provide the
> necessary circulating vortex air flow within the micro cavities under
> the Elytra thus giving the anomalous lift we all see as evidence that
> very large bugs, rhinobeatles and bumblebees can achieve what the text
> books prove cannot be done. "Fly"!
>
> Sometimes it is great to be able to go back and retreive messages that
> are applicable to today's topics.
>
> On 1/11/2019 6:30 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Ok! folks, Ole has brought up a very interesting point when
>> comparing the air mass, weather and the phenomenon of levitation,
>> anti-gravity etc. Something that I have been wanting to bring up but
>> the subject is a little far out of the mainstream thinking. Lets
>> look at a profound statement here:
>>
>>
>> Alfven quote:"If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant magnetic
>> field, every motion of the liquid gives rise to an E.M.F. which
>> produces electric currents. Owing to the magnetic field, these
>> currents give mechanical forces which change the state of motion of
>> the liquid. Thus a kind of combined electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave
>> is produced.^"
>>
>> ^
>>
>> ^
>>
>> ^Back when I posted the articles on electrostatic generators, I had
>> stated that the 9th grade Science Class explanation for the source of
>> the electrons was believed to be a shearing from the air as the
>> device rotated, example Wimshurst Machine. WRONG. I gave you the
>> example of the Felici Electrostatic Generator
>> http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/highvoltage/HVgenerator/HVgenerator.htm
>> Here we have a device that uses pure hydrogen gas at 30 bar pressure
>> as the operating media and produces 2.5 KW at 300KV. CERN is
>> operating an electrostatic generator that has a deep vacuum as the
>> operating media. ?? Ole's example of air is interesting for we have
>> discussed tornadoes and how we observe Anti-gravitic phenomenon at
>> the vortex base due to the counter rotating, vortex-anti vortex
>> eddy currents in which we get the Alfven example of
>> Electromagnetic-hydrodynamics. We see this same example in the
>> Sonodiffuser with the production of the micro cavitation production
>> of vortex-counter vortex producing the photon burst. Air when
>> ionized is a highly conductive fluid as is water.
>>
>>
>> ^
>>
>> ^With a background education in Aerodynamics, I studied the subject
>> as thoroughly as possible an came away with a different Theory. See:
>> https://www.mpoweruk.com/flight_theory.htm. Bernoulli's Principle and
>> Newton's Law of motion do not complete the puzzle. In wind tunnel
>> testing of airfoils, little turfs of string are attached at thousands
>> of points on the upper, lift producing areas of the wing. There is
>> clear evidence that micro vertices are produced along with the
>> counter vertices and we get a gross production of the anti-gravitic
>> effects as we see in the tornado example. See, I told you that this
>> fly's way outside of mainstream thinking. The more we examine the
>> evidence, new conclusions spring forth. Thank You Ole for your
>> question opens a whole new approach into all thing that perturb the
>> Aether.
>>
>> On 1/10/2019 8:40 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Norman,
>>>
>>> When looking at a weather map showing the air pressure wind speed or
>>> temperature as field lines does that really mean that air is made up
>>> of field lines or just being some mathematical construct? What if
>>> the air is made up of small particles only connected when bouncing
>>> into each other. The particles then could transfer forces just like
>>> electric and magnetic fields or gravitational fields. T.J.J. See
>>> (https://wiki2.org/en/Thomas_Jefferson_Jackson_See) and C.A.
>>> Bjérknes (https://wiki2.org/en/Carl_Anton_Bjerknes) demonstrated
>>> that the same laws applied no matter what medium was used and thus
>>> concluded that there must be some aether behaving like gases or
>>> liquids. The same conclusion is made by the Rhythmodynamics theory:
>>> http://mirit.ru/rd_2007en.htm.
>>>
>>> Even gravity is united into those kind of theories but still missing
>>> in classical electromagnetism. Here is a video showing levitating
>>> objects using sound waves in air: Present: "Levitation in a Sound
>>> Standing Wave" (11 khz): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIi5tUupH9c
>>> (3:35). Even though the sound waves may be described by using field
>>> lines I don't see this really describing air or sound as being made
>>> of field lines. It's just a mathematical construct that can be
>>> broken down to something even smaller. Field lines are very useful
>>> in describing a field except when the field lines become
>>> discontinuous at some intersections.
>>>
>>> "https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by the earth
>>> for example. This field is very big. If virtual photons can travel
>>> all the way around the field in a time shorter than planck time,
>>> aren't they moving faster than the speed of light?" Ah Ha! Super
>>> Light, Super luminal velocities."
>>> This may actually be the case. W.B. Smith couldn't measure any delay
>>> in the propagation of his tensor beam. His theory tells that it
>>> carries time along with its length and thus is at the same time
>>> along its length. What is considered empty space by most of science
>>> actually has the physical constants of permittivity of vacuum and
>>> permeability of vacuum as if there is still something physical
>>> there? The theories that take this into account are probably more
>>> correct than the ones dismissing such facts. According to the theory
>>> of Rhythmodynamics there are different modes of wave propagation
>>> like longitudinal waves behaving like transverse waves at some
>>> distance from the emitters which could be why light and other
>>> electromagnetic waves are seen as transverse electromagnetic waves.
>>>
>>> We may be living in several different densities that propagates
>>> signals at each their own speed. Glass water air and vacuum have
>>> each their own density and speed of propagating electromagnetic
>>> waves. Perhaps there are even less densities than the ones we know.
>>> John W. Keely claimed that this is the case.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4gCTmlm5RQ
>>>
>>> On 1/10/2019 6:21 PM, Norman Wootan nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...>
>>> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lets look at the actual make up of the magnetic flux lines.
>>>> https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=414
>>>>
>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/30fari/what_is_a_magnetic_field_made_of/
>>>> Interesting note here "Take the magnetic field created by the
>>>> earth for example. This field is very big. If virtual photons
>>>> can travel all the way around the field in a time shorter than
>>>> planck time, aren't they moving faster than the speed of
>>>> light?" Ah Ha! Super Light, Super luminal velocities.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYA0bntrjsk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P-FGw5KUeo&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crfY2vzVMbI&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rst9EcF9ryk&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk1cOffTgdk&feature=youtu.be
>>>> The Best!
>>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2019 4:55 PM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank You, Bert Pool for this new soc.
>>>>> https://scienceblog.com/505176/scientists-inch-closer-to-fusion-energy-with-discovery-of-a-process-that-stabilizes-plasmas/
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:58 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@...
>>>>> <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alfvén wave
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An *Alfvén wave* is a wave that occurs in a plasma
>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Plasma> (or conducting
>>>>>> fluid), resulting from the interaction of the magnetic fields
>>>>>> and electric currents
>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Electric_current> within it,
>>>>>> causing an oscillation of the ions. Alfvén wrote in a letter
>>>>>> to the journal /Nature/ in 1942:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant magnetic
>>>>>> field, every motion of the liquid gives rise to an E.M.F.
>>>>>> which produces electric currents. Owing to the magnetic
>>>>>> field, these currents give mechanical forces which change
>>>>>> the state of motion of the liquid. Thus a kind of
>>>>>> combined electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is
>>>>>> produced."^[1]
>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Alfv%C3%A9n_wave#cite_note-alfven1942-1>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alfvén waves initiated the field of magnetohydrodynamics
>>>>>> <https://www.plasma-universe.com/Magnetohydrodynamics> which
>>>>>> subsequently earned Alfvén a Nobel Prize.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Put some thought behind this statement "A conductive liquid"!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:41 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n Please read
>>>>>>> this mans research and see how he was often rejected by
>>>>>>> fellow physicists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 7:31 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://aa.springer.de/papers/7324002/2300449.pdf Still
>>>>>>>> researching the importance of the Alfven waves in plasma.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Moray, Jon Gentry and Warren asked pertinent questions
>>>>>>>>> regarding velocities, magnetic flux etc. in plasma events
>>>>>>>>> so I did a search as to whether Alfven waves have a
>>>>>>>>> frequency. This site pretty well defines a lot of plasma
>>>>>>>>> info that we need. See:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.britannica.com/science/plasma-state-of-matter#ref507092
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/2019 6:29 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@... <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...>
>>>>>>>>> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>> Hooper's work looks very compelling. At his time of
>>>>>>>>>> experimentation, super conductors were not a reality as
>>>>>>>>>> they are now. The fact that a resistance free conductor
>>>>>>>>>> might accelerate a potential's velocity, after going
>>>>>>>>>> through a resistor, suggests an analogy to fluid
>>>>>>>>>> dynamics, much like Bernuili's principle application of a
>>>>>>>>>> venturi to gases.
>>>>>>>>>> The idea of dielectric conductors is a mind smasher,
>>>>>>>>>> inverting our entire circuit thoughts.
>>>>>>>>>> Generally, pretty radical concepts, in a zone to set us
>>>>>>>>>> up for quantum physics thinking. Whew!
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 3:17 PM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>>>> nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good question Warren! Nobody really knows how the
>>>>>>>>>> potential and current manifest in the conductor
>>>>>>>>>> passing through a flux field. Your question is valid
>>>>>>>>>> cause there very well may be some sort of reconnect
>>>>>>>>>> occurring here. Theory was, that the flux field was
>>>>>>>>>> photon stream which enabled pairing to produce
>>>>>>>>>> electrons and attending current. There is still so
>>>>>>>>>> much that we don't know but things are getting
>>>>>>>>>> interesting. Read that last doc that I posted for it
>>>>>>>>>> is very enlightening on this subject. See:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/temp/x565-hen.htm
>>>>>>>>>> This is one of Oles favorites.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 9:09 AM, Warren Keillor
>>>>>>>>>> schoonersolsticemoon@...
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:schoonersolsticemoon@...> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Norman
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if, in a down to earth , practical manner,
>>>>>>>>>>> the connect/re-connect plays a role in, for
>>>>>>>>>>> instance, the Kromery, where one slides the magnets
>>>>>>>>>>> at right angles to their locked together state.
>>>>>>>>>>> Initially, I need both hands to grasp the flywheel
>>>>>>>>>>> to turn my Kromery.
>>>>>>>>>>> Once turning, one finger's friction on the rim,
>>>>>>>>>>> easily rotates the flywheel, regardless of the load.
>>>>>>>>>>> Too fast, then eddy currents start warming the
>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic coil cores.
>>>>>>>>>>> Are we cutting those magnetic lines?
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 9:25 AM, Norman Wootan
>>>>>>>>>>> nwootan@... <mailto:nwootan@...> [EVGRAY]
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://young.caltech.edu/Collisionless_Magnetic_Reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:21 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://phys.org/news/2017-10-hidden-mechanics-magnetic-field-reconnection.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gss.pppl.gov/talks/reconnection%20lecture%201.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2019 8:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-0545-0_14
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Developments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Theory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dieter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biskamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Planck-Institut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fiir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plasmaphysik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8046
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Garching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bei
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Miinchen,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Germany
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Abstract
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> briefly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reviews
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> models,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petschek
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortcomings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accounting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reynolds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stationary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> states
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> small-scale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MHD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> turbulence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geometry,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> giving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dissipation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reconnection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collisional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sistivity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decade
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been realized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> magnetic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ubiquitous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phenomenon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cosmic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>