Body
Hi Norman,
This annihilation is treated as if a magnetic field is really made of some lines of force. Normally field lines are just a mathematical way of representing fields. Consider if the theory of W.B. Smith or the Rhythmodynamics theory is correct that density is most fundamental after space. Density is then followed by having the density diverge which is represented by the electric field which again is followed by curling around the electric field or spinning the diverging density to get the (tornado like) magnetic field. Then annihilation of magnetic fields is like having two tornadoes of opposite spin direction cross each other to annihilate. Smith's principle of inversion happens when two fields of the same kind same direction and same size shares more than half of each other in the same space. This is when the fields become coherent and represent more energy than the sum of the energy of each of the fields when separate. Where the energy manifests is where the two separate fields becomes coherent (i.e. becomes one new field instead of two separate ones).
Annihilation of the fields may not actually be happening. If making an experiment with a transformer core that can be separated as in figure 1A and 1B while powered on it looks like the two fields canceling each other are still active. By shorting the secondary coil (blue) and energizing the primary coil (red) with alternating current the primary and secondary field cancels each other. The I-part of the core isn't 'attracted' to the E-part and can be easily removed (figure 1B). But when removing the I-part the coupling between the two coils is partly lost and the inductance drops way down because of the air gap introduced. Thus have a current limiter like an incandescent lamp in series with the primary coil to limit the current. When operating only the primary coil (i.e. open circuit secondary coil) the I-part of the core is very hard to remove (figure 1A) as the core gets almost fully magnetized. If managing to remove the I-part with the primary energized the inductance almost vanishes and big current runs which must again be limited (by the lamp) from outside the coil.
From this experiment it looks like the two opposing magnetic fields from the primary and secondary coils cancel each other as the I-part of the core can be easily removed while energized. But the I-part must be in place to conduct the magnetic fields that are canceling to avoid the primary coil from shorting the power supply. Does that mean that the fields are still there even though they cancel out and can't be measured as a magnetic field or a force field? The current in each of the canceling coils can be measured to indicate that the source of the magnetic fields does indeed exist.
The above experiment shows that W.J. Hooper (http://electrogravityphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/1-Hooper-New-horizons-in-EM-and-gravitational-field-theory-transcription.pdf http://electrogravityphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/1-Hooper-New-horizons-in-EM-and-gravitational-field-theory-transcription.pdf) is right in that there are more fields than shown in the modern form of the equations of Maxwell. The modern vector form was reduced from the original Maxwell equations by Oliver Heaviside (https://wiki2.org/en/Oliver_Heaviside https://wiki2.org/en/Oliver_Heaviside). This made it easier for engineers to work with but some of the solutions are thrown away.
Regards
Ole
---In [email protected], <nwootan@...> wrote :
Yes! The transverse wave gives the pinch, compression that drives the anti-parallel flux annihilation, reconnect.
Illustration:
On 1/10/2019 7:47 AM, Mick mkjekyll@... mailto:mkjekyll@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
Norm,
As far as a rudimentary frequency:
Looks to me it's like strumming a guitar string, depending on which
string, as depending on the ions and density of the plasma as a
secondary reaction vis a vis frequency. Nothing much on the primary
magnetic flux besides Alven wave velocity and time. I guess it's akin
to throwing a permanent magnet towards some wires... The Alvin is
longitudinal and the frequency reaction is transverse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfv%C3%A9n_wave https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfv%C3%A9n_wave
On 1/10/2019 7:51 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@... mailto:nwootan@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
> Alfven waves