Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect phenomenon

Database ID: 111635
2019-01-10T07:31:39-06:00
Norman Wootan <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

http://aa.springer.de/papers/7324002/2300449.pdf   Still researching the 
importance of the Alfven waves in plasma.

On 1/10/2019 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Moray, Jon Gentry and Warren asked pertinent questions regarding 
> velocities, magnetic flux etc. in plasma events so I did a search as 
> to whether Alfven waves have a frequency.  This site pretty well 
> defines a lot of plasma info that we need. See: 
> https://www.britannica.com/science/plasma-state-of-matter#ref507092
>
> On 1/10/2019 6:29 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] 
> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>> Norman
>> Hooper's work looks very compelling. At his time of experimentation, 
>> super conductors were not a reality as they are now. The fact that a 
>> resistance free conductor might accelerate  a potential's velocity, 
>> after going through a resistor, suggests an analogy to fluid 
>> dynamics, much like Bernuili's principle application of a venturi to 
>> gases.
>> The idea of dielectric conductors is a mind smasher, inverting our 
>> entire circuit thoughts.
>> Generally, pretty radical concepts, in a zone to set us up for 
>> quantum physics thinking. Whew!
>> Cheers Warren
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>
>>     On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 3:17 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>     Good question Warren!   Nobody really knows how the potential and
>>     current manifest in the conductor passing through a flux field.
>>     Your question is valid cause there very well may be some sort of
>>     reconnect occurring here. Theory was, that the flux field was
>>     photon stream which enabled pairing to produce electrons and
>>     attending current. There is still so much that we don't know but
>>     things are getting interesting.   Read that last doc that I
>>     posted for it is very enlightening on this subject. See:
>>     http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/temp/x565-hen.htm This is one
>>     of Oles  favorites.
>>
>>     On 1/9/2019 9:09 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>     Norman
>>>
>>>     I wonder if, in a down to earth , practical manner, the
>>>     connect/re-connect plays a role in, for instance, the Kromery,
>>>     where one slides the magnets at right angles to their locked
>>>     together state.
>>>     Initially, I need both hands to grasp the flywheel to turn my
>>>     Kromery.
>>>     Once turning, one finger's friction on the rim, easily rotates
>>>     the flywheel, regardless of the load.
>>>     Too fast, then eddy currents start warming the magnetic coil cores.
>>>     Are we cutting those magnetic lines?
>>>     Cheers Warren
>>>     Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>     <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>
>>>         On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 9:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>>         <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY]
>>>         <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>         http://young.caltech.edu/Collisionless_Magnetic_Reconnection.html
>>>
>>>         On 1/9/2019 8:21 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         https://phys.org/news/2017-10-hidden-mechanics-magnetic-field-reconnection.html
>>>>
>>>>         On 1/9/2019 8:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         https://gss.pppl.gov/talks/reconnection%20lecture%201.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>>         On 1/9/2019 8:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-0545-0_14
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Recent
>>>>>>         Developments
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         Theory
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         Magnetic
>>>>>>         Reconnection
>>>>>>         Dieter
>>>>>>         Biskamp
>>>>>>         Max-Planck-Institut
>>>>>>         fiir
>>>>>>         Plasmaphysik
>>>>>>         8046
>>>>>>         Garching
>>>>>>         bei
>>>>>>         Miinchen,
>>>>>>         Federal
>>>>>>         Republic
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         Germany
>>>>>>         Abstract
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         talk
>>>>>>         briefly
>>>>>>         reviews
>>>>>>         previous
>>>>>>         stationary
>>>>>>         models,
>>>>>>         mainly
>>>>>>         configurations
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         Petschek
>>>>>>         type,
>>>>>>         pointing
>>>>>>         out
>>>>>>         their
>>>>>>         shortcomings
>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>         basic
>>>>>>         failure
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         accounting
>>>>>>         for
>>>>>>         fast
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         reconnection
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         limit
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         large
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         Reynolds
>>>>>>         number.
>>>>>>         It
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         shown
>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         this
>>>>>>         limit
>>>>>>         no
>>>>>>         relevant
>>>>>>         stationary
>>>>>>         states
>>>>>>         exist.
>>>>>>         Instead
>>>>>>         strong
>>>>>>         small-scale
>>>>>>         MHD
>>>>>>         turbulence
>>>>>>         develops
>>>>>>         even
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         2D
>>>>>>         geometry,
>>>>>>         giving
>>>>>>         rise
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         energy
>>>>>>         dissipation
>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>         reconnection
>>>>>>         rates
>>>>>>         independent
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         value
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         collisional
>>>>>>         re-
>>>>>>         sistivity.
>>>>>>         I
>>>>>>         Introduction
>>>>>>         In
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         last
>>>>>>         decade
>>>>>>         it
>>>>>>         has
>>>>>>         been realized
>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         presence
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         fields
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         a
>>>>>>         ubiquitous
>>>>>>         phenomenon
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         cosmic
>>>>>>         systems.
>>>>>>         On
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         one
>>>>>>         hand,
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         fields
>>>>>>         serve
>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>         a large
>>>>>>         energy
>>>>>>         reservoir
>>>>>>         which
>>>>>>         may
>>>>>>         be
>>>>>>         tapped
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         a fast
>>>>>>         dynamic
>>>>>>         process
>>>>>>         leading
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         various
>>>>>>         kinds
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         explosive
>>>>>>         events
>>>>>>         such
>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>         flares.
>>>>>>         On
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         other
>>>>>>         hand,
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         fields
>>>>>>         tend
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         be
>>>>>>         compressed
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         processes
>>>>>>         such
>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>         protostar
>>>>>>         formation
>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>         are
>>>>>>         computed
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         dominate
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         dynamics
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         later
>>>>>>         phases
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         a nonrealistic
>>>>>>         way
>>>>>>         if
>>>>>>         not
>>>>>>         dissipated
>>>>>>         sufficiently
>>>>>>         fast.
>>>>>>         To
>>>>>>         account
>>>>>>         for
>>>>>>         such
>>>>>>         processes of
>>>>>>         fast
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         field
>>>>>>         annihilation
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         main
>>>>>>         objective
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         theory
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         reconnect
>>>>>>         ion.
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         term
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         reconnect
>>>>>>         ion
>>>>>>         refers
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         picture
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         field
>>>>>>         lines.
>>>>>>         These
>>>>>>         have
>>>>>>         a well-defined
>>>>>>         meaning
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         a highly
>>>>>>         conducting
>>>>>>         fluid,
>>>>>>         viz.
>>>>>>         thin
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         flux
>>>>>>         tubes
>>>>>>         which
>>>>>>         are
>>>>>>         carried
>>>>>>         along
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         fluid,
>>>>>>         maintaining
>>>>>>         their
>>>>>>         individuality,
>>>>>>         though
>>>>>>         they
>>>>>>         may
>>>>>>         be
>>>>>>         wound
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         a very
>>>>>>         complex
>>>>>>         manner.
>>>>>>         Only
>>>>>>         owing
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         finite
>>>>>>         electrical
>>>>>>         resistivity
>>>>>>         or
>>>>>>         some
>>>>>>         equivalent
>>>>>>         process
>>>>>>         may
>>>>>>         two
>>>>>>         field
>>>>>>         lines
>>>>>>         coming
>>>>>>         close
>>>>>>         together
>>>>>>         lose
>>>>>>         their
>>>>>>         identities
>>>>>>         by
>>>>>>         being
>>>>>>         cut
>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>         reconnected
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         a different
>>>>>>         way.
>>>>>>         Though
>>>>>>         this
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         a local
>>>>>>         process,
>>>>>>         it
>>>>>>         leads
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         a change
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         field
>>>>>>         topology
>>>>>>         permitting
>>>>>>         new
>>>>>>         types
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         large-scale
>>>>>>         plasma
>>>>>>         motions
>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>         would
>>>>>>         otherwise
>>>>>>         be
>>>>>>         inhibited.
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         255
>>>>>>         w.
>>>>>>         BrinbMnn
>>>>>>         et
>>>>>>         al.
>>>>>>         (eds.J,
>>>>>>         Physical
>>>>>>         Processes
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         Hot
>>>>>>         Cosmic
>>>>>>         PlIlsmas,
>>>>>>         255-269.
>>>>>>         e
>>>>>>         1990
>>>>>>         Kluwer
>>>>>>         Academic
>>>>>>         Publishers.
>>>>>>         256
>>>>>>         change
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         field
>>>>>>         is described
>>>>>>         by
>>>>>>         Faraday's
>>>>>>         law:
>>>>>>         oB
>>>>>>         (
>>>>>>         ...
>>>>>>         )
>>>>>>         2'"
>>>>>>         7it=VX
>>>>>>         iixB
>>>>>>         +
>>>>>>         'IV
>>>>>>         B.
>>>>>>         (1)
>>>>>>         Here
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         ratio
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         diffusion
>>>>>>         term
>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         convection
>>>>>>         term
>>>>>>         (2)
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         a convenient
>>>>>>         dimensionless
>>>>>>         measure
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         resistivity,
>>>>>>         Rm
>>>>>>         being
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         Reynolds
>>>>>>         number.
>>>>>>         In
>>>>>>         practically
>>>>>>         all
>>>>>>         astrophysical
>>>>>>         plasmas
>>>>>>         Rm
>>>>>>         is large,
>>>>>>         essentially
>>>>>>         because
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         large
>>>>>>         scales
>>>>>>         L.
>>>>>>         Hence
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         diffusion
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         general
>>>>>>         a very
>>>>>>         weak
>>>>>>         process.
>>>>>>         Magnetic
>>>>>>         processes
>>>>>>         such
>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>         solar
>>>>>>         flares,
>>>>>>         however,
>>>>>>         seem
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         require
>>>>>>         fast
>>>>>>         reconnection
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         time
>>>>>>         scales
>>>>>>         practically
>>>>>>         independent
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         Rm.
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         main
>>>>>>         theoretical
>>>>>>         problem
>>>>>>         therefore
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         find
>>>>>>         models
>>>>>>         allowing
>>>>>>         sufficiently
>>>>>>         high
>>>>>>         reconnect
>>>>>>         ion
>>>>>>         rates.
>>>>>>         Fast
>>>>>>         reconnection
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         not
>>>>>>         a diffuse
>>>>>>         process,
>>>>>>         but
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         strongly
>>>>>>         localized
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         current
>>>>>>         sheets.
>>>>>>         Such
>>>>>>         current
>>>>>>         sheets
>>>>>>         may
>>>>>>         arise
>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>         any
>>>>>>         point
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         non-vanishing
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         shear
>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>         a velocity
>>>>>>         gradient
>>>>>>         along
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         direction
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         shear
>>>>>>         perpendicular
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         field,
>>>>>>         i.e.
>>>>>>         virtually
>>>>>>         everywhere
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         plasma,
>>>>>>         as
>>>>>>         visualized
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         Fig.
>>>>>>         1.
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         simplest
>>>>>>         models
>>>>>>         are
>>>>>>         quasi-stationary
>>>>>>         configurations
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         one
>>>>>>         current
>>>>>>         sheet
>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>         a well
>>>>>>         defined
>>>>>>         location
>>>>>>         determined
>>>>>>         by
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         overall
>>>>>>         geometry,
>>>>>>         which
>>>>>>         have
>>>>>>         been
>>>>>>         investigated
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         conventional
>>>>>>         theory
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         reconnection.
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         basic
>>>>>>         assumption
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         these
>>>>>>         theoretical
>>>>>>         approaches is
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         existence
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         a two-dimensional
>>>>>>         subsystem
>>>>>>         around
>>>>>>         an
>>>>>>         X-type
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         neutral
>>>>>>         point
>>>>>>         which
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         small
>>>>>>         compared
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         global
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         configuration
>>>>>>         but
>>>>>>         large
>>>>>>         compared
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         so-called
>>>>>>         diffusion
>>>>>>         region
>>>>>>         around
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         neutral
>>>>>>         point,
>>>>>>         where
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         diffusion
>>>>>>         term
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         (1)
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         important.
>>>>>>         In
>>>>>>         this
>>>>>>         subsystem
>>>>>>         conditions
>>>>>>         would
>>>>>>         rapidly
>>>>>>         adjust
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         changes
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         global
>>>>>>         configuration,
>>>>>>         so
>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         evolution
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         latter
>>>>>>         would
>>>>>>         correspond
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         a sequence
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         stationary
>>>>>>         states
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         former
>>>>>>         which
>>>>>>         are
>>>>>>         steady-state
>>>>>>         solutions
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         boundary
>>>>>>         conditions
>>>>>>         determined
>>>>>>         by
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         global
>>>>>>         system.
>>>>>>         This
>>>>>>         is
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         idea
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         stationary
>>>>>>         forced
>>>>>>         reconnection.
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         prototype
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         such
>>>>>>         configurations
>>>>>>         is Petschek's
>>>>>>         reconnection
>>>>>>         model
>>>>>>         1),
>>>>>>         which
>>>>>>         is given
>>>>>>         schematically
>>>>>>         in
>>>>>>         Fig.
>>>>>>         2.
>>>>>>         In
>>>>>>         fact,
>>>>>>         much
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         theoretical
>>>>>>         work
>>>>>>         on
>>>>>>         magnetic
>>>>>>         reconnection
>>>>>>         2
>>>>>>         ),3)
>>>>>>         consists
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         modifications
>>>>>>         and
>>>>>>         refinements
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         this
>>>>>>         model.
>>>>>>         The
>>>>>>         theory
>>>>>>         is based
>>>>>>         on
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         effect
>>>>>>         that
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         motion
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         a plasma
>>>>>>         may
>>>>>>         be
>>>>>>         supersonic
>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>         arbitrarily
>>>>>>         low
>>>>>>         speed
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         respect
>>>>>>         to
>>>>>>         the
>>>>>>         slow
>>>>>>         mode
>>>>>>         . Hence,
>>>>>>         by
>>>>>>         analogy
>>>>>>         with
>>>>>>         a system
>>>>>>         of
>>>>>>         two
>>>>>>         supersonic
>>>>>>         gas
>>>>>>         jets
>>>
>>

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 7862 invoked by uid 102); 10 Jan 2019 13:31:43 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.196.204.226) by m10.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2019 13:31:43 -0000
X-Received (qmail 5997 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2019 13:31:43 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta4004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.201.195.149) by mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2019 13:31:43 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-YMailISG phssEv8WLDuqYxJ7Vs3hNIcf2lziq4G86Ru5tzgXjak9eIu_ nUfHZB079eykJO9Osye4w0Qryje_J_qfr73S.e6sXiE8359delQp7WnU3i6s Ugd_z4OzoVhcBv866shyJ11K_FvUSXdKLDvftRG1ehiy_2UzzEh1rThrymmq I1sYf59vH2iJx.UHve72Rl2i7R_NJATfIgvkdFbE3lONC51Hi912Ml.tIuoX HIIXqu0AgMxkQ8OZ5RHLYEBuWQpoE95At07Ux.ndyHD0mbjUC3JRz3tkLemC CwvNbrDgDWVlPvfLQKse8M1hhJSN_3YG9mB24NPAYicyTOyGlsk_1yZkrlvE 3Z4iEedfO8SJTYCBWhau8yH5y9dr42xIaeLRiPA_IFmk96aAgg8vAjcHSzbi J3A3db9D9pQbvdgDIYLncj81eNPvY.BugDuj0wmiAg5hlrP6EkjO60zHQkc_ xZOcXBVpe6e3O13jxad6dtib8INkrsRIqYX9HPSNWqc6f7gHKjJElRHESgHw 4uxBmpDL_zp0iRB5ct4qxr1LSoyY8d3Zewf7KXvCK5t8J7C4i2d0SJy9YiSL hcxY1pzAs1Kn57f21WJic_Xa.BsKwLaqf5op4P6NNgCGbgXjho_T.Q.hvA6Y 6JHs1RB5gOqhWA.2G8r9SbDbvMBIMOiJvhXi0Jv2nsvKzqEOwj5615XnXm07 pwE0_SjLDYB.tdIRQA5YuROZTpD7zqvM0e7W0N4lpFXiyMZkZSekMG4PxkqJ 0tddA1.oOiIMsVLXkXqeUBiCIRrJd8f3_QzQvHmdTIiqLz0E7CcnqlIOExsV 5pXLnKUVm7DVfj82OWApyKVR0rUQX6NZleqCs_rim1QeKCB2Wh0mH9b8Mq2J rH8SNEiQFXl0voJ40oXzzvR0tvcfOsPJl_2Ra3mtqSeWZjdPTZBNGZaXmsDS btlQBDh5Cy2cek5U2EViCg8BoMaUOuB8INHIDrCzkHBn1ENY9M9WWGuh_FIc 8Y_OSuaKPcL8eluFLPC_yUFzbTVFV.SMEBPGQUml8TVxP614TObQFZalqmx5 R_CWhYp6KZcPimRVtWakXpxRV0xAv..edpJrktxVS_vePi_K0g1wph.Hvekj AqaMb7wXNgD2u41V9Uy7jlVr.DosVztWjZAaUtkbi_Av8mBhOloZuK3S4.7b N1ykVv.ufoyDZAQn3qYn6n9yXcRHy7W6n2g9D_BVA3u6z7anq3I1LOsoSVKm O7ieZN8wPW.NsFwGHt_PQwfTMVLLrtcHFZEdFKwq8bWHp23HFUC.DB6dIb4M b2vprE5Or6W4SQ1815IF6f2Qg2M0N1BbHwgSq9Q0hN.G82Wj3c_LtIXlEQA8 QeWb5AnzaFsTjQ15zT35HumFbct.Q.sJ3mmwNDWOgmQjWjQSMIYNRd9ims1W biwIbiov7KhSwEckLfi8yKXAMgVqnIKh7ink7ws9i47q_FIlMz9bOA8VrRPP VxsfzdFbbsxbdxZykfOfpEdm9sqNkN9ufDoK3xYl5ky7dzZCv9H6oPB.xj5S gJFvwvQ9nBFsQ9a9ZL_rwQ--
Authentication-Results mta4004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [email protected]; header.s=s1024; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic306-6.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com) (74.6.132.45) by mta4004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:31:43 +0000
X-YMail-OSG ss137mMVM1njgKWrV2CLvPq9lJIIOlL91NXB.GdWW55GjXMKi.FvTmr5ydNUqVM vjf5VKIOV7kdNXKKWVHDcJiIb2SDFWDjT6KEhtJd3tumPfvCQwG3PcFRHKyp9J8UpWiCee.56jTv jszqvPS7gIXN_9RdZJzDdu1Q6hPbCBP1Byi61T_LlMBTW3yIkvH2kbC9_xEKkixO2ttl_V_vZnLO o_ABZuADXwfATXFjO1lzkNmqDf3D5o7Lqdw.qMk3ECxM0b.8S9vtX9_LuueK.1mk0gliBe7C_Q4p HUXYmcy2H6rqE7tPxtaPoxlYDJtBnnIEV6L2.Ly_cd0ZnR5Zty8HFQ2ZHsqDWumEfnaM.TE8Hc_j GvSwXWokazXNYuadkbL4g13OvYVoJQ2dPbgd5ahylAt8aEy_aFjq9cvj4dujAPRH6R_UMtlCuOin hErCWDkJZRfhgDPyoSAG6iAw_T3ZJn_6MCMb_Hl893E2V68OzsV1z6ebo16Y1dRlkF.2Nmc5GUb5 b7uj3qtGnvxUhabAT8EDHo3f5t53NU2RPrUQSIbqFSyZ0HLg_WKGF0RujK8IxR8_RLwg90dVXE0b tOyiQVfCMZYCYP96ALmDKIC_E8.hnJtchcplpgZkrLNvAXSkYpczjBAFOvT4eWk2VkENkorbLUkB 0T98MKHoqB3EpwnkfdYA67jTz0aBKJlbTEvMtY7fqI26fMeIDH5Mxc_lWDqjJKFtCQJGDkk7mg_k IakvcS9SV45Dltb97TsKWLRviWvOoO2rcw4sV0JArL9EmfVbnZTt6F5C7HqS9hfAWBvvd8NQAJkm PWqw7RDILMek.iVCyRw4monYSSGdWHYzXlVsTg0Z5Xh.d72drJRqz5CAvH59mqFJTntTrVJwoU7w Q98hYJHr1HrvtskA1kDJK2isE0Ciy7zz92C2FSjEkYC_UOxX_rlM6QZV2MwBzlYvu8bH4dnZOURN TTC2yA8Ehia5rPriWGwUvSd5BkYIp0M0I7lJUJ3coaQpLVVi_V88xtUv2zpkMFOq3i2bzE3H2cNt dKoImoYtLbKeXCq5XXvLPT8gPJkdf.o_sxWf.gOHGxi4ifvp4_6hEQd66vDPff_1CsmrGmJ8kpTW l
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:31:42 +0000
X-Received from ip70-189-27-193.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.5]) ([70.189.27.193]) by smtp405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID fa163183f779131f3f69f9b85d8099ab; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:31:40 +0000 (UTC)
To [email protected], Mbking42 <[email protected]>, Jon Gentry <[email protected]>, Bert Pool <[email protected]>, Bob Paddock <[email protected]>, joel mcclain <[email protected]>, Lane Wootan <[email protected]>, Toby Grotz <[email protected]>, Walt <[email protected]>, Phil Rembold <[email protected]>, Angel Alvarez <[email protected]>, Fredric Fletcher <[email protected]>, Jeane Manning <[email protected]>
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2019 07:31:39 -0600
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4FD7D7610D8324E88BDAE626"
Content-Language en-US
X-Originating-IP 10.201.195.149
Subject Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect phenomenon
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=554418533; y=zF5KsGODrtHpF9DO5WGEwXhBcv9v-f_cEmoEmg2uzSxZ0484v1mhnb5D
X-Yahoo-Profile [email protected]
From Norman Wootan <[email protected]>