Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect phenomenon

Database ID: 111631
2019-01-09T14:16:01-06:00
Norman Wootan <[email protected]>

← View thread

Message-ID
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Body

Good question Warren!   Nobody really knows how the potential and 
current manifest in the conductor passing through a flux field. Your 
question is valid cause there very well may be some sort of reconnect 
occurring here. Theory was, that the flux field was photon stream which 
enabled pairing to produce electrons and attending current.  There is 
still so much that we don't know but things are getting interesting.   
Read that last doc that I posted for it is very enlightening on this 
subject.  See: http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/temp/x565-hen.htm   
This is one of Oles  favorites.

On 1/9/2019 9:09 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected] 
[EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norman
>
> I wonder if, in a down to earth , practical manner, the 
> connect/re-connect plays a role in, for instance, the Kromery, where 
> one slides the magnets at right angles to their locked together state.
> Initially, I need both hands to grasp the flywheel to turn my Kromery.
> Once turning, one finger's friction on the rim, easily rotates the 
> flywheel, regardless of the load.
> Too fast, then eddy currents start warming the magnetic coil cores.
> Are we cutting those magnetic lines?
> Cheers Warren
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
>     On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 9:25 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     http://young.caltech.edu/Collisionless_Magnetic_Reconnection.html
>
>     On 1/9/2019 8:21 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>>     https://phys.org/news/2017-10-hidden-mechanics-magnetic-field-reconnection.html
>>
>>     On 1/9/2019 8:14 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>
>>>     https://gss.pppl.gov/talks/reconnection%20lecture%201.pdf
>>>
>>>     On 1/9/2019 8:09 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-009-0545-0_14
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Recent
>>>>     Developments
>>>>     in
>>>>     the
>>>>     Theory
>>>>     of
>>>>     Magnetic
>>>>     Reconnection
>>>>     Dieter
>>>>     Biskamp
>>>>     Max-Planck-Institut
>>>>     fiir
>>>>     Plasmaphysik
>>>>     8046
>>>>     Garching
>>>>     bei
>>>>     Miinchen,
>>>>     Federal
>>>>     Republic
>>>>     of
>>>>     Germany
>>>>     Abstract
>>>>     The
>>>>     talk
>>>>     briefly
>>>>     reviews
>>>>     previous
>>>>     stationary
>>>>     models,
>>>>     mainly
>>>>     configurations
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     Petschek
>>>>     type,
>>>>     pointing
>>>>     out
>>>>     their
>>>>     shortcomings
>>>>     and
>>>>     basic
>>>>     failure
>>>>     in
>>>>     accounting
>>>>     for
>>>>     fast
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     reconnection
>>>>     in
>>>>     the
>>>>     limit
>>>>     of
>>>>     large
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     Reynolds
>>>>     number.
>>>>     It
>>>>     is
>>>>     shown
>>>>     that
>>>>     in
>>>>     this
>>>>     limit
>>>>     no
>>>>     relevant
>>>>     stationary
>>>>     states
>>>>     exist.
>>>>     Instead
>>>>     strong
>>>>     small-scale
>>>>     MHD
>>>>     turbulence
>>>>     develops
>>>>     even
>>>>     in
>>>>     2D
>>>>     geometry,
>>>>     giving
>>>>     rise
>>>>     to
>>>>     energy
>>>>     dissipation
>>>>     and
>>>>     reconnection
>>>>     rates
>>>>     independent
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     value
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     collisional
>>>>     re-
>>>>     sistivity.
>>>>     I
>>>>     Introduction
>>>>     In
>>>>     the
>>>>     last
>>>>     decade
>>>>     it
>>>>     has
>>>>     been realized
>>>>     that
>>>>     the
>>>>     presence
>>>>     of
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     fields
>>>>     is
>>>>     a
>>>>     ubiquitous
>>>>     phenomenon
>>>>     in
>>>>     cosmic
>>>>     systems.
>>>>     On
>>>>     the
>>>>     one
>>>>     hand,
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     fields
>>>>     serve
>>>>     as
>>>>     a large
>>>>     energy
>>>>     reservoir
>>>>     which
>>>>     may
>>>>     be
>>>>     tapped
>>>>     in
>>>>     a fast
>>>>     dynamic
>>>>     process
>>>>     leading
>>>>     to
>>>>     various
>>>>     kinds
>>>>     of
>>>>     explosive
>>>>     events
>>>>     such
>>>>     as
>>>>     flares.
>>>>     On
>>>>     the
>>>>     other
>>>>     hand,
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     fields
>>>>     tend
>>>>     to
>>>>     be
>>>>     compressed
>>>>     in
>>>>     processes
>>>>     such
>>>>     as
>>>>     protostar
>>>>     formation
>>>>     and
>>>>     are
>>>>     computed
>>>>     to
>>>>     dominate
>>>>     the
>>>>     dynamics
>>>>     in
>>>>     the
>>>>     later
>>>>     phases
>>>>     in
>>>>     a nonrealistic
>>>>     way
>>>>     if
>>>>     not
>>>>     dissipated
>>>>     sufficiently
>>>>     fast.
>>>>     To
>>>>     account
>>>>     for
>>>>     such
>>>>     processes of
>>>>     fast
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     field
>>>>     annihilation
>>>>     is
>>>>     the
>>>>     main
>>>>     objective
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     theory
>>>>     of
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     reconnect
>>>>     ion.
>>>>     The
>>>>     term
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     reconnect
>>>>     ion
>>>>     refers
>>>>     to
>>>>     the
>>>>     picture
>>>>     of
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     field
>>>>     lines.
>>>>     These
>>>>     have
>>>>     a well-defined
>>>>     meaning
>>>>     in
>>>>     a highly
>>>>     conducting
>>>>     fluid,
>>>>     viz.
>>>>     thin
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     flux
>>>>     tubes
>>>>     which
>>>>     are
>>>>     carried
>>>>     along
>>>>     with
>>>>     the
>>>>     fluid,
>>>>     maintaining
>>>>     their
>>>>     individuality,
>>>>     though
>>>>     they
>>>>     may
>>>>     be
>>>>     wound
>>>>     in
>>>>     a very
>>>>     complex
>>>>     manner.
>>>>     Only
>>>>     owing
>>>>     to
>>>>     finite
>>>>     electrical
>>>>     resistivity
>>>>     or
>>>>     some
>>>>     equivalent
>>>>     process
>>>>     may
>>>>     two
>>>>     field
>>>>     lines
>>>>     coming
>>>>     close
>>>>     together
>>>>     lose
>>>>     their
>>>>     identities
>>>>     by
>>>>     being
>>>>     cut
>>>>     and
>>>>     reconnected
>>>>     in
>>>>     a different
>>>>     way.
>>>>     Though
>>>>     this
>>>>     is
>>>>     a local
>>>>     process,
>>>>     it
>>>>     leads
>>>>     to
>>>>     a change
>>>>     of
>>>>     field
>>>>     topology
>>>>     permitting
>>>>     new
>>>>     types
>>>>     of
>>>>     large-scale
>>>>     plasma
>>>>     motions
>>>>     that
>>>>     would
>>>>     otherwise
>>>>     be
>>>>     inhibited.
>>>>     The
>>>>     255
>>>>     w.
>>>>     BrinbMnn
>>>>     et
>>>>     al.
>>>>     (eds.J,
>>>>     Physical
>>>>     Processes
>>>>     in
>>>>     Hot
>>>>     Cosmic
>>>>     PlIlsmas,
>>>>     255-269.
>>>>     e
>>>>     1990
>>>>     Kluwer
>>>>     Academic
>>>>     Publishers.
>>>>     256
>>>>     change
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     field
>>>>     is described
>>>>     by
>>>>     Faraday's
>>>>     law:
>>>>     oB
>>>>     (
>>>>     ...
>>>>     )
>>>>     2'"
>>>>     7it=VX
>>>>     iixB
>>>>     +
>>>>     'IV
>>>>     B.
>>>>     (1)
>>>>     Here
>>>>     the
>>>>     ratio
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     diffusion
>>>>     term
>>>>     and
>>>>     the
>>>>     convection
>>>>     term
>>>>     (2)
>>>>     is
>>>>     a convenient
>>>>     dimensionless
>>>>     measure
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     resistivity,
>>>>     Rm
>>>>     being
>>>>     the
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     Reynolds
>>>>     number.
>>>>     In
>>>>     practically
>>>>     all
>>>>     astrophysical
>>>>     plasmas
>>>>     Rm
>>>>     is large,
>>>>     essentially
>>>>     because
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     large
>>>>     scales
>>>>     L.
>>>>     Hence
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     diffusion
>>>>     is
>>>>     in
>>>>     general
>>>>     a very
>>>>     weak
>>>>     process.
>>>>     Magnetic
>>>>     processes
>>>>     such
>>>>     as
>>>>     solar
>>>>     flares,
>>>>     however,
>>>>     seem
>>>>     to
>>>>     require
>>>>     fast
>>>>     reconnection
>>>>     with
>>>>     time
>>>>     scales
>>>>     practically
>>>>     independent
>>>>     of
>>>>     Rm.
>>>>     The
>>>>     main
>>>>     theoretical
>>>>     problem
>>>>     therefore
>>>>     is
>>>>     to
>>>>     find
>>>>     models
>>>>     allowing
>>>>     sufficiently
>>>>     high
>>>>     reconnect
>>>>     ion
>>>>     rates.
>>>>     Fast
>>>>     reconnection
>>>>     is
>>>>     not
>>>>     a diffuse
>>>>     process,
>>>>     but
>>>>     is
>>>>     strongly
>>>>     localized
>>>>     in
>>>>     current
>>>>     sheets.
>>>>     Such
>>>>     current
>>>>     sheets
>>>>     may
>>>>     arise
>>>>     at
>>>>     any
>>>>     point
>>>>     with
>>>>     non-vanishing
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     shear
>>>>     and
>>>>     a velocity
>>>>     gradient
>>>>     along
>>>>     the
>>>>     direction
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     shear
>>>>     perpendicular
>>>>     to
>>>>     the
>>>>     field,
>>>>     i.e.
>>>>     virtually
>>>>     everywhere
>>>>     in
>>>>     the
>>>>     plasma,
>>>>     as
>>>>     visualized
>>>>     in
>>>>     Fig.
>>>>     1.
>>>>     The
>>>>     simplest
>>>>     models
>>>>     are
>>>>     quasi-stationary
>>>>     configurations
>>>>     with
>>>>     one
>>>>     current
>>>>     sheet
>>>>     at
>>>>     a well
>>>>     defined
>>>>     location
>>>>     determined
>>>>     by
>>>>     the
>>>>     overall
>>>>     geometry,
>>>>     which
>>>>     have
>>>>     been
>>>>     investigated
>>>>     in
>>>>     the
>>>>     conventional
>>>>     theory
>>>>     of
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     reconnection.
>>>>     The
>>>>     basic
>>>>     assumption
>>>>     in
>>>>     these
>>>>     theoretical
>>>>     approaches is
>>>>     the
>>>>     existence
>>>>     of
>>>>     a two-dimensional
>>>>     subsystem
>>>>     around
>>>>     an
>>>>     X-type
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     neutral
>>>>     point
>>>>     which
>>>>     is
>>>>     small
>>>>     compared
>>>>     with
>>>>     the
>>>>     global
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     configuration
>>>>     but
>>>>     large
>>>>     compared
>>>>     with
>>>>     the
>>>>     so-called
>>>>     diffusion
>>>>     region
>>>>     around
>>>>     the
>>>>     neutral
>>>>     point,
>>>>     where
>>>>     the
>>>>     diffusion
>>>>     term
>>>>     in
>>>>     (1)
>>>>     is
>>>>     important.
>>>>     In
>>>>     this
>>>>     subsystem
>>>>     conditions
>>>>     would
>>>>     rapidly
>>>>     adjust
>>>>     to
>>>>     changes
>>>>     in
>>>>     the
>>>>     global
>>>>     configuration,
>>>>     so
>>>>     that
>>>>     the
>>>>     evolution
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     latter
>>>>     would
>>>>     correspond
>>>>     to
>>>>     a sequence
>>>>     of
>>>>     stationary
>>>>     states
>>>>     in
>>>>     the
>>>>     former
>>>>     which
>>>>     are
>>>>     steady-state
>>>>     solutions
>>>>     with
>>>>     the
>>>>     boundary
>>>>     conditions
>>>>     determined
>>>>     by
>>>>     the
>>>>     global
>>>>     system.
>>>>     This
>>>>     is
>>>>     the
>>>>     idea
>>>>     of
>>>>     stationary
>>>>     forced
>>>>     reconnection.
>>>>     The
>>>>     prototype
>>>>     of
>>>>     such
>>>>     configurations
>>>>     is Petschek's
>>>>     reconnection
>>>>     model
>>>>     1),
>>>>     which
>>>>     is given
>>>>     schematically
>>>>     in
>>>>     Fig.
>>>>     2.
>>>>     In
>>>>     fact,
>>>>     much
>>>>     of
>>>>     the
>>>>     theoretical
>>>>     work
>>>>     on
>>>>     magnetic
>>>>     reconnection
>>>>     2
>>>>     ),3)
>>>>     consists
>>>>     of
>>>>     modifications
>>>>     and
>>>>     refinements
>>>>     of
>>>>     this
>>>>     model.
>>>>     The
>>>>     theory
>>>>     is based
>>>>     on
>>>>     the
>>>>     effect
>>>>     that
>>>>     the
>>>>     motion
>>>>     of
>>>>     a plasma
>>>>     may
>>>>     be
>>>>     supersonic
>>>>     at
>>>>     arbitrarily
>>>>     low
>>>>     speed
>>>>     with
>>>>     respect
>>>>     to
>>>>     the
>>>>     slow
>>>>     mode
>>>>     . Hence,
>>>>     by
>>>>     analogy
>>>>     with
>>>>     a system
>>>>     of
>>>>     two
>>>>     supersonic
>>>>     gas
>>>>     jets
>
>

References

<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Headers

Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Sender [email protected]
X-Apparently-To [email protected]
X-Received (qmail 11820 invoked by uid 102); 9 Jan 2019 20:16:54 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.196.204.226) by m2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2019 20:16:54 -0000
X-Received (qmail 28224 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2019 20:16:54 -0000
X-Received from unknown (HELO mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (10.221.10.59) by mtaq3.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2019 20:16:54 -0000
X-Original-Return-Path <[email protected]>
X-Received-SPF none (domain of att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-YMailISG dcEWSLgWLDsfrbumGkKFnt4n_cRDBCD6b1UnFIiINalKmiV_ Sy10pBKEhj6bxI0mk3DWKofGjJ8VDfLYPoah8s7_BS6RhS3Q0.CJhIhyq0Hj b5RBbngB.ORROfmuXghFUGLYIkJQ38d85a60s06Goq1y8l6Ex0hVGLjqRfYK UpxS4QzwGFhsM8jRW.q998.vxjpstgGVoALOKOFjyTwXAS_sjOQQfJzJv5Mw wev9BF5p.M3G4IVHY2X0ZsanomuZXpRp57UJwFK4vUzyR8FoxHMRgAYlqqLd lWRiQn6qXs.ifkqtOPtKE0FT1sMBqX14a9.aAff4ECUHA1KCsG9D3qgOqJFz 08SEoV1el8RscZbaBDc6MwqAoQ.4bvNa6FYxGxedSH.6paoTDvPlFAfItf47 5EESHBTULS4GDXqCXNs3FncPHGZRHcsJ1hN1pidxmjPc7Wm6L0O39i_W.4kM XZPFHxQk.hp7apdA4SxdEgHAR3VLV_2PK1hrDf9YloBMQEYNg_4QNxIc_ffT eD5VWheqaQht136eeJPNHnoUF4640d1nqyxRJcBlh02rSmIvRU0oHIbERDfF mF8yrXJmd9X5TV5bFvmQkn69YiMnMsdVVI1rAJc6URaWc6EyIUXEK_sDN5Pb M4EExas.ambs03NctUyyFbie9o.ebTSbW73T.OMgKxCInvCQ81po3xFKLpd4 H5jUvROQTap_icT8eV6TQyVvh.Xrdy0hL0blphXPLSRgcQyildFjy9NVap4L lOe50CJksEc9SN9oUhA1eKjDbWXFE.48Q1g.rctFqctJiwpQ.Rdifw0Fu8mw jXVg6_zrHg1IL2OhiPA8NFEDpfAtxDn.Uj8R.cKosajQCLh5pMKrV441RBFT bfyR0POdbpHQjkfoqEQHw_KZy3Ff5NQ7NYXeoQ_5wcEDatlsXspjEd79_cAl 2Ye1W74X.GpNQ.elWGP_HZgTbWvuOvY512.Z8_HQa9sQk0LpF1GNyFbv2NsM lTGX_0hr8iLNRuBozmtTnrcGkBrAMzPzaVExjbaky9.4jG2WOO_fOBgPfX1B 8WAO2etAjxGxKX39S3gl5yYLwgGzasVJVdUR3YbPFlTA7b_ROrTpRfq2O8Zo RWtHV5MK8rvHr7pN1K5o4Fjni0csDFmnhFm1kPs9LtjPAMuV7tKXZ6viEwrF 5AGOAaCE1e7vnC3wp4pbi9mUWysTny.r2PrcKG69xhizJZrYD7X2FRh73dSU pJFklOs6RK_5AFflJr36a6YpxC8C4D763lxOFrNVgBHMczNjOVkLY4McUjUn dzbunfeqz6bHJp_AUtG7UNWi.Yqsheu5VGM2M6IkzFw3SAuUnLmlskA9ubTG ckLyZfGXW9qF3wxdzK0ItMncl1jDdaMvIBAfuHdXGW.P1RtTTHDu.Y2sAata EO.k69Ypd3hfdric2NtTphS0PeT4IB3qlgKYqQWAxvVcAqT69a.jpioWgwXg sM1OjUmaRPY6LVAsIMP2Urg..VciUy5PQlGhLbsc8HUWksH.ZYOJcBVzVYhQ x03QzX6fYHbjzmaNQlU-
Authentication-Results mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [email protected]; header.s=s1024; dkim=pass (ok)
X-Received from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO sonic309-24.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (66.163.184.150) by mta4001.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTPS; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 20:16:53 +0000
X-YMail-OSG AkQzjIAVM1nEZXjgkCvmLW.4HeuXxbvoamTcEpR0c32yG9uraumUGe0YsKKk0VZ NCupG48MDQzpNqw.mFfC8gVJrVWbQ0h_XmdwiHUS_9F6mGuw.31_jzTsOM_KOPGiy6304bv_PE4b GGVp.83LhLgaucCjPBxj46GQEOd0sFHBROvwkPu7wp7WaUzKxw4UM2jKLNpvyc2Nk5owGaBwR36u sQqadYKak1sCKSJ34H8vCi_cZcCEn3MleR8ucRXzCEN957WCQ.p8MF776A_NEqAhtj096oL_IKsV IrkDyGPDSOCzKjK5889v4ajyRrc7sfPEdk3RZUYqc913.lT.BohveSOsTB_9YLUadGjGth2Kayj7 heb9p6zarqupDbDTMcCWIbWQY7qaUos8TAEX5gtQjcQtbe7Bim0w6r7_1XnPW3cFbMjL4NVPeczn 6UmdqZzYvx6T8C_YHB0MH3dgfvDxZnupvzmqe682hwfHNdmu5LyXO1jOO.axeaMuba2NpC.7cxC4 X3qKv4PsEcowFAEce22yR_iV4UfwtLpffFm8p4nngzlKIfVh.CgsGDxO5qtygEANVUZswOuX3mQZ wkahAXKyC9UdLIjBGGPGxGBQ5TDmA6RErFGKBcVzPCuADN4PyBa76pNvkk2FDCRRvkDYUd8qw5Jk sqG71RN6o7GfAJ6Tdnmaom63eS.A01hB09NLw6.dN_66q8Ccn24CJF8Ccg3waeM1KIj8DlViNIzL kRbeI3ERG.6j21WIfIEvJsuXGSlaiBpp5SoNF9.17LZx4exSzhRnmowNZmbBN6SE3hK4oorOB5Qv p1GRWAguDI3b8F_gRY2701ht5B02GCkj0zLK2wuWQKcELyWKnqPbxp8tk41.d.Oht5E.8J_AQpGt 8SpnYhMxVVeUR1MyW.XcWbOiF1TXCBBV3fJT1TsUtFZJ__Wb8lWk8lXRCx2PTrM5O3_TmbBr5bRs EeyHOry1fDgaKOtVuaycikjjDTkYB4YbLIS2wny2yWlatAESPmoLZY_t2u7bVUZC2LPLD9AT7tlK IPR1xBUlLu47lcPEovLMaLNfrhfcKtZb9CidTeYOOIns12yU70AwqQA--
X-Received from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 20:16:53 +0000
X-Received from ip70-189-27-193.lf.br.cox.net (EHLO [192.168.0.5]) ([70.189.27.193]) by smtp427.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 844562c336c6e8190b19f33ca61d5533 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 20:16:02 +0000 (UTC)
To [email protected]
References <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2019 14:16:01 -0600
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <[email protected]>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="------------30552F27F95336B1EC0F9E18"
Content-Language en-US
X-Originating-IP 10.221.10.59
Subject Re: [EVGRAY] Re: Magnetic flux annihilation-reconnect phenomenon
X-Yahoo-Group-Post member; u=554418533; y=dwSwcaPJ5K7ZGnFoimzrvw6d-GfEtQ_4kF5s-p6b_EABxmB8Q24mY6r6
X-Yahoo-Profile [email protected]
From Norman Wootan <[email protected]>