Re: [EVGRAY] Panacea site

Body

Well it involves a pluse system like Muller but that's a bad example for
this it's removing the core material after the push pulse so the material
doesn't interfere with the other neo's the disk would just free wheel with
a heavy flywheel and no other iron around to lock up the rotation just a
power pulse and pull the cores .greater pulse energy with out any drag
.there getting I think 3.3 OU now with out iron cores just air .Bedini was
talking about it on a vid about Watson's motor once at speed the energizers
would only turn on occasionally because of the stored kinetic in the big
flywheel .that put I in to OU .the thing would just act as a magneto
generator free wheeling .there not much said about stored flywheel energy
and bedini's wheels a little not much .to capture the pulse energy as
motion and use it to turn the wheel is a part of the system .

On Saturday, November 3, 2018, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> James very subjective question It depends on the setup and use motor or
> generator, the frequency number of pulses per second how close the coils
> are to one another.  However for small slower motor systems more power/
> torque should be developed with the core than copper alone.  Without the
> core or with very fine core there is less loss due to  Lenz on the
> generating side or when loaded at certain speeds as a motor.  If I got any
> of this wrong Kone can correct me as he is far more knowledgeable with this
> kind of thing.
>
> On 11/3/2018 1:10 PM, James Glinski [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm going to ask a general question .when using a coil with a magnet for
> turning a wheel .when you use the coil with out a iron core you use x
> amount of power in a pluse .and is it more when you use a iron core in the
> same coil . is the presence of iron just generate a larger magnetic field
> .with out more energy being used. ? Or does the iron core pull more energy
> ? In useage ? Any opinions ?.
>
> On Saturday, November 3, 2018, [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Mick
>> Not sure if this related to rotary condenser description, but run cap
>> phase of rotovertor motor is known ad rotary transformer phase (not so much
>> condensor)
>> Kone
>>
>
> 
>