Body
I think it was Newton that said that power in and power out was the same
for electrostatic generators and electromagnetic .
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Oh! BTW, if you enclose the unit in an air tight enclosure and draw down a
> high vacuum, you get rid of the air drag losses and the O/U ratio goes up
> drastically!
>
> On 10/10/2018 10:25 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Warren & Mick, a vacuum cleaner motor turning 6,000 RPM usually draws
> about 10 amps therefor it is 1200 watts or one HP to turn a device that
> puts out 20KW in HVDC output. Not bad for O/U ratio!
>
> On 10/10/2018 10:17 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
>
> Warren! I etched from printed circuit board material but your laser
> cutting is more precise and a lot easier! See the Hyde generator or
> segment design.
>
>
> <http://rexresearch.com/hyde/hyde.htm>
> http://rexresearch.com/hyde/hyde.htm Great photos of actual machine
> components!
>
> On 10/10/2018 10:07 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
>
> Norman
> That is a cute idea, making an air gap variable capacitance machine.
> It is an ideal project for a laser cutting service, rather than making
> stupid Christmas ornaments like most people use them for.
> It really doesn't matter which metal they are cutting. Stainless steel
> works great, laser cut out from sheet stock. Caps are usually aluminium,
> and anodized. I wonder what shape is needed of each sector? One might also
> stack machine them to shape
> Cheers Warren
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 10:57 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY]
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> https://patents.google.com/patent/US3013201A/en
>
> On 10/10/2018 9:50 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4897592.html Mick! This is the
> > machine that Charles Yost published an article on and the one that I
> > built and eventually gave it to Bert Pool, Ft. Worth Tesla Coil
> > Builders group!
> >
> >
> > On 10/10/2018 9:43 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
> >> https://patents.google.com/patent/US2697793 After you read this
> >> lengthy description of the problem with the Van de Graff belt
> >> transfer method, you will so why they elected to go the Vacuum
> >> dielectric media approach!
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>