Body
See remarks!
On 9/29/2018 6:46 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm,
>
> Wish I had known you then, would have come out for a visit. Those
> caps how amazing. I literally had a tons of large powerful caps
> that mostly came out of Stanford University Linear Accelerator Lab.
> Bert Pool & Phill still have many of the big Sangamo caps in there
> goodie pile!
>
> Did you try earthing the high voltage negative pulses and check for a
> mirror charge in positive? The earthing of pulses was done with
> the Neutral Spike experiments. There is a pronounced earth response to
> pulses! Please stop and think about the elevated positive terminal
> aka Tesla. Think about the hydraulic analog here as to the function of
> the upper terminal. Think water hammer where the work is being done
> at the earth negative going pulses and the positive side is the
> pressure accumulator! (potential driverz). I think you can get the
> picture. Tesla said many times that a proper wotrking example of his
> theory would not have any spark discharges at upper capacitive
> terminal.. Would be a waste of energy. Artist concepts of Wardencliff
> tower depict lightning bolts iminating from uper capacitance
> terminal. WRONG! Properly tuned to drive earth spiking there is no
> terminal discharge at all.
>
> As far as your understanding of the experiment do the little batteries
> work based on that adjustable top load ball he had about 80 or so feet
> up? Little batteries were used by Tesla for the Telegraphy
> experiments of 1899.
>
> Was the magnet part strictly electromagnet or a perm magnet wrapped
> into a hybrid perm-electromagnet? Permanent magnets for I had many
> hundreds of pounds of all types of magnets known. Neos, I had
> hundreds of pounds of them. Alnico 8 same there for I was wrecking
> down RCA Klystrons out of high power radar. One Klystron = 600 # of
> Alnico 8 magnets. They brought $6 /# at that time.
>
> My thoughts wold be strictly electromagnet based on how magnets are
> made now, but not sure... Electromagnets are more powerful but the
> right Neos do the trick!
>
>
> On 9/29/2018 4:30 PM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Although I have two copies of the Colorado Springs Notes, it was
>> unfortunate that I did not find Page 25 info till 2012. In 2012 I
>> had liquidated the Lab and sole off my 52 acre Research Farm and
>> moved back into Dallas.
>>
>>
>> Around 2004, I built Tesla's Disrupter Transformer and Re-worked on
>> of my X-ray supply pot (60KV) by switching the diode array so that
>> the the anode output was now negative output instead of positive to
>> be used to drive the disrupt coil. I had a HVDC negative power
>> supply at 60KV. I had a bank of capacitors to charge using the HVDC
>> supply. I used a large DC long throw HV relay which I could fire at
>> various pulse rates via mechanical insulated actuator. The 60KV caps
>> came out of SLAC, Stanford Linear Accelerator Complex and I managed
>> to get 60 of them at 2.5 MFD ea. I was discharging about 5
>> killo-Joules per pulse. The re-charge time of the cap bank dictated
>> the rate of firing. By discharging the caps through the very
>> powerful magnetic horn gap I got that unidirectional pure negative DC
>> discharge which was a blue white fire and gave the physical shock
>> wave that Tesla described in his experiments. Was an interesting
>> experiment. I just wish I had found the page 25 info while I had my
>> Lab. Sorry NO, I did not replicate Tesla's page 25 experiment!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/29/2018 11:05 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Norm,
>>>
>>> Have you replicated this experiment?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/29/2018 6:22 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kone! Your quote: I think Tesla was using a magnet to snuff the
>>>> spark out as you say at just the right distance for the 1/8
>>>> wavefront prior to it dropping on the other side of the 1/4.
>>>>
>>>> DUH! Please re-read the page 25 from the Colorado Springs Notes,
>>>> for Tesla laid out the fundamentals of how to pulse the earth with
>>>> negative unidirectional longitudnal waves using a magnetic quenched
>>>> discharge tube. Yes ! This was his magnetic rectifier via a
>>>> rapidly quenched discharge tube. This is precisely how the
>>>> Wardencliff system was going to work with the huge underground
>>>> earthing grid. Sort of like Hector deep earth ball. His findings
>>>> while experimenting with Telegraphy in 1899 allowed his ability to
>>>> radiate pulses into the ground at .020 A or 20 milliamps at 200 VDC
>>>> pulses (unidirectional with negative polarity). The elevated
>>>> antennae terminal carried a positive charge. Tesla, the Master,
>>>> left this vivid clue as to how your ground pulse approach should
>>>> work. You do not have to re-invent the wheel for it was given to
>>>> you to improve! BTW, Great work! Norm
>>>>
>>>> On 9/29/2018 12:36 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Kone,
>>>>>
>>>>> A cap will not charge with AC unless the waveform is highly
>>>>> asymmetric as each compression or rarefaction would need to be
>>>>> caught at 1/8 - 1/4 wavelength and disconnected to charge with
>>>>> conventional sine wave for instance. Otherwise as you say the
>>>>> charge is equalized with AC. I think Tesla was using a magnet
>>>>> to snuff the spark out as you say at just the right distance for
>>>>> the 1/8 wavefront prior to it dropping on the other side of the 1/4.
>>>>>
>>>>> Likely what you were noticing in your experiments as it creates
>>>>> very short DC pulses 1/8 to 1/4 of the wavelength so much higher
>>>>> harmonics than the fundamental.
>>>>>
>>>>> High voltage DC in a high rise for instance could cause all sorts
>>>>> of interesting havoc charging up layered walls as capacitors for
>>>>> instance. With a pair of diodes and GDT's the cap will rise in
>>>>> voltage to destruction and the plasma explosions are deafening.
>>>>> First is a hissing as insulation breaks through and the sound of
>>>>> air escaping a punctured tire. As the air ionizes enough to
>>>>> conduct the voltage stored in the cap with jump with a huge flash
>>>>> and bang, very dangerous!
>>>>>
>>>>> The spheres can be purchased inexpensively in China but shipping
>>>>> is another story. One could use a well I suppose but the danger
>>>>> of killing the well motor and having no water is a risk too high.
>>>>> Having enough trouble shutting down GFI's around here.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/27/2018 11:51 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Mick
>>>>>> Just my two cents I noticed with spark gapping experiments of
>>>>>> about 2000v coming from 90 degree to Airgap of n n pulsed dc
>>>>>> ucking coils (konehead motor) the distance of sparkgap adjusted
>>>>>> precise could make the ac looking pulse and collapse signal
>>>>>> suddenly go all humpy dc with just the right Airgap distance.
>>>>>> Someone told me Tesla uses to use sparkgaps to rectify HV all the
>>>>>> time as no good HV diodes back then.
>>>>>> Also have noticed let's say filling AC cap with AC...when you
>>>>>> disconnect charging of it then use cap to discharge to load there
>>>>>> is usually nothing there like the forces cancel naturally l don't
>>>>>> know
>>>>>> But if you rectify before filling cap now those joules and
>>>>>> potential in there will "stick" and upon discharge you see a good
>>>>>> blast of.power. I noticed same thing with my peak coil shorting
>>>>>> stuff in that without diodes first to rectify there is nothing
>>>>>> when ac cap discharges to a load...
>>>>>> Have you seen Hector's ground rod with large metal sphere
>>>>>> capacitor ball in air? This would be interesting to try....maybe
>>>>>> restaurant supply store has a couple giant mixing bowls you could
>>>>>> put together for sphere...
>>>>>> I will look around for that circuit drawing and post it when I
>>>>>> find it
>>>>>> Kone
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>