Re: [EVGRAY] Electromagnet - Wikipedia

Body

Hi Warren,
 
 I haven't studied Hector's rotoverter enough to tell why it works. My guess would be to look for the Principle of Inversion given by W.B. Smith. Another UFO/ET contactee Daniel Fry also gives this principle and states that the natural laws are inverted which can be used for inverting gravity to antigravity. This can actually be done by just manipulating electrons according to Fry as also suspected by W.B. Smith and W.J. Hooper.
 
 Manipulating the sample rate of nature (all being waves according to the Rhythmodynamics theory) can invert the forces. This will make a motor work as a generator or a heater work as a cooling device etc.
 
 I have completed a small Pierre Cotnoir alike setup consisting of two hex MOSFET bridges and an Arduino board for controlling them. Instead of the generator stator six small ferrite transformers are used as this is a solid state project with no need for an actually rotating field. At least for now I don't believe it necessary for the field to actually rotate or spin. The hardware is made for being able to individually control the 24 MOSFETs which make it possible for a lot of different mixing of the waves. The first test was just two waves running mostly overlapping each other at some phase shift. This didn't give off excess energy. There was no coil shorting of individual coils as in the original device of Cotnoir.
 
 One peculiar characteristic of the setup is that when running in saturated mode it doesn't take extra energy when loading the device. I don't remember if this happens in a normal transformer.
 
 Regards
 Ole
 

---In [email protected], <schoonersolsticemoon@...> wrote :

 Ole Now for the big question.
 Using the rules, why does Hector's RV work? It most certainly does, as I have tested it myself, quite carefully. I achieved 1.614 times more than was feeding it, a little less than others, who got 1.618, but that is close enough for validation.
 Why does it work?
 By understanding, perhaps we can use it better?
 Cheers Warren

 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature
 
 On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 7:22 AM, onielsen@... [EVGRAY]
 <[email protected]> wrote:

   Hi James,

Ideal coils as well as ideal capacitors are pure reactive components meaning they don't dissipate energy. They just store the energy. Coils and capacitors are diametrically opposites of each other. What current is for a coil voltage is for a capacitor and vice versa. This can be shown when making a circuit of just one capacitor and one coil (inductor). Applying energy to such a circuit (LC-tank) will make it oscillate continually if the energy isn't dissipated which requires some resistance. The energy is oscillating between fully magnetic (current or amps) and fully electric (tension or voltage). Thus for a coil the tension doesn't represent energy stored but only how fast the energy is moved which is the power. For a capacitor the current doesn't represent energy stored but only how fast the energy is transferred which is the power.

Real coils and capacitors have resistance because they are made of metals having resistance (usually copper and aluminum or tantalum). The resistive part is called the parasitic part when dealing with both capacitors and inductors. Inductors also have a capacitive part (between the turns as well as to the ambient) which is also a parasitic part when dealing with inductors. Capacitors also have an inductive parasitic part because when current enters them a magnetic field is created around the current path which is inductive. Even resistors have parasitic parts of inductance and capacitance because of the same reasons. Thus all the three fundamental components of electronics (i.e. the resistor, capacitor and inductor) have parts of each other intrinsic to them.

Calculating a circuit is way easier when dealing with only the ideal parts of the components. When building the calculated circuit some surprises may arise because of omitting the parasitic values in the calculations. This becomes more distinctly the higher the working frequency or the faster the switching transitions of the circuit. Even the wires or leads connecting the components have resistance capacitance and inductance. For the theory behind it for example read Ivor Catt about electromagnetism.

Regards
Ole

 

---In [email protected], <jglinski01@...> wrote :

 Norm read Thu it and nothing about voltage .as far as there concerned voltage doesn't exist ? With I think is bs .with out it there's no Watts all current and no volts ?? Well I kept looking and ..
 By using a battery with a greater voltage the strength is increased. You can also add more batteries to a series circuit to increase the strength. What factors affect the strength of an electromagnet? By increasing the number of coils of wire around an object can increase the strength of the electromagnet. How would they Dodge this ?
 On Sep 23, 2018 4:50 PM, "Mick mkjekyll@... mailto:mkjekyll@... [EVGRAY]" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
   Far out, reminiscent of an n-machine
 
 On 9/23/2018 2:37 PM, Norman Wootan nwootan@... mailto:nwootan@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
 e