Body
Norm,
Do you have any more background on Aarons video? Easy to get magnets
to jump discharging through a coil, how is the setup different such as
source of DC and source of static?
On 9/18/2018 7:02 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0iYdN-pfEo
>
>
> On 9/18/2018 8:51 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>>
>> https://youtu.be/azfxP9lBAao Ok! Guys, here is something that I never thought about regarding the EV Gray Repulsion Plate experiments. (I had the EV Gray plates with the motors we found in Dodge KS.) Please note the novel idea to actually extract energy from a coil energized with HV Electrostatic potential and pulsed with colliding low voltage DC to a common ground! This is very worthy of research and quantification! Here again we see the Green white spark discharge which is a clue. Think! Colliding both HV Potential with DC pulse!
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Fwd: Re: [EVGRAY] the infinite magnetic field EH antenna
>> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:27:12 -0500
>> From: Norman Wootan <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [EVGRAY] the infinite magnetic field EH antenna
>> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 10:51:47 -0700
>> From: Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Norm,
>>
>> I think I stole it from you hahaha. Anyways I know Smith was using
>> magnets in his devices or at least a very rectangular BH curve
>> material, his use of the GDT was brilliant by the way. I also know
>> he was not fucking around because of the amount of experimental
>> devices and scale of some of the other stuff. As he told people he
>> left things out of his explanations and the circuit diagrams have
>> obvious issues.
>>
>> I have a feeling it went like this, same way as Wesley who was
>> visited, and they said "we don't care what you make or sell just as
>> long as no one believes you" therefore no more demo after the first
>> one. He could have been brain blasted too where they target the
>> person with serious gain extremely short waves or he was just plain
>> unlucky. The fact that brilliant guy from Cavetonics had a stroke
>> gives me pause.
>>
>> Negative impedance, capacitance resistance, it doesn't matter, a pump
>> is a pump is a pump.
>>
>> BTW I don't think one needs microspheres if working with lower
>> frequencies, Teslas sperical topload comes to mind and was not the
>> TMT supposed to have a multitude a spheres packed around the torus
>> topload...
>> Dr Tesla was so insanely brilliant the fact we are not super advanced
>> as a species is because too many scientists were/are too stupid to
>> understand him and the greed won out from there.
>>
>> Surface plasmon polaritron, see a similarity to aether along a
>> polished conductor...
>>
>> Norm you still play in the lab or permanently gone crawdadding?
>>
>> http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/acousticsystem/resonators.html
>>
>> https://econtact.ca/7_2/godman_vitruvius.pdf
>>
>>
>> On 9/16/2018 6:02 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Mick! Glad to see someone is paying attention! Your quote! BTW. I
>>> was a friend of Smith and can verify that his goal was to capture
>>> and utilize the earth magnetic fields as his source of power. He
>>> had all the maps of magnetic flux anomalies around the earth. His
>>> favorite was at Little Rock AR. You are correct in your
>>> assumption! You mentioned the Neutral Spike phenomenon. It all
>>> goes back to the John Miliske Super Light which you should re-read
>>> and appreciate its implications. See: Super Light.
>>>
>>> *WHAT IS SUPERLIGHT ?*
>>>
>>> *By: Dr. John Mileweski***
>>>
>>> *SuperLight is magnetic light; it is **magneto–electric radiation**. *
>>>
>>> *Regular light is electric light or **electro–magnetic radiation**.
>>> There is parity or symmetry the Universe, everything has an equal
>>> and opposite mirror–image counterpart, the Ying and the Yang, right
>>> and left, matter and anti matter, the electron and the positron. Why
>>> not light? *
>>>
>>> *Both science and metaphysics have honored this parity law in all
>>> things except light. They are wrong. ** There is parity in light as
>>> well ! *
>>>
>>> *I will now explain and give you more detail. *
>>>
>>> *SuperLight is the unseen force in nature that has been ignored by
>>> science but real to the mystics and metaphysicians for thousands of
>>> years. It has been given different names by different cultures for
>>> thousands of years. *
>>>
>>> *A Nuous, Chi, Biomagnetic Energy, Wilhelm Reich's Orgone Energy,
>>> Tesler's Free Earth Energy, Animal Magnetism, Space Energy, Vacuum
>>> Energy, and Zero Point Energy, etc. Those who have subtle perception
>>> know it is real. *
>>>
>>> *SuperLight was identified scientifically over 100 years ago when
>>> James Clerk Maxwell <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/report.htm>
>>> solved his famous wave equation. This occurred shortly after radio
>>> was invented by Nikola Tesla
>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/tesla.htm>, and theoretical
>>> physicists tried to find a mathematical model to explain radio
>>> waves. When using positive numbers in Maxwell's Equations this
>>> explains radio waves and also all forms of electro–magnetic
>>> radiation such as light, radio, TV, microwaves, x–rays, etc. What
>>> his equation also explains 100 years ago was SuperLight but because
>>> it was the solution that comes from the use of negative numbers,
>>> **"this second solution"**was ignored for over 100 years. Remember
>>> when you were taught algebra and were told to ignore imaginary
>>> numbers (e.g. The square root of –1) because they have no meaning in
>>> this world. Well, times have changed and now we have a very valid
>>> second solution to Maxwell's equation and it is SuperLight. *
>>>
>>> *In the mid 70's a scientist, Dr. William Tiller, at Stanford
>>> University took another look at Maxwell's equation and asked; "What
>>> does this second solution explain when interpreted in our world."_{1} *
>>>
>>> *To understand this second solution, we must first review what the
>>> first or positive solution explains. The first solution is as
>>> follows: Radio waves leave the antenna and radiate out into space
>>> from a point source (the antenna) equally in all directions into
>>> space toward infinity traveling at the speed of light. The wave is
>>> composed of a large electrical component and a small magnetic
>>> component 90 degrees to the electrical component. Thus named,
>>> electro–magnetic radiation. *
>>>
>>> *The second solution describes a particle wave of just the opposite
>>> structure. It explains that **from infinity traveling toward the
>>> point source from all directions radiates SuperLight**. This new
>>> radiation is composed of a large magnetic component and a small
>>> electrical component, thus the name, magneto–electric radiation.
>>> When the equations are looked at more closely, one finds that
>>> **"SuperLight" travels at the speed of light squared !** 10^20
>>> meters per second, or 10 billion times faster than light
>>> <http://www.hbci.com/%7Ewenonah/new/gravity2.htm>. *
>>>
>>> *It has a frequency 10 billion times higher, and has a
>>> corresponding, shorter wavelength. It therefore has a higher
>>> energy density. *
>>>
>>> *The question one asks immediately is, "if it is so powerful, how
>>> come we do not feel it, or how come it is not detected
>>> scientifically?" Well, the frequency is so high, its wave length
>>> so short, (4 x 10^–8 nano–meters, or 4 x 10^–17 meters), its
>>> velocity so fast, that it goes through everything as though the
>>> substance was nearly completely transparent (like glass). *
>>>
>>> *We can say the higher frequency is completely penetrating like
>>> x–rays, but even more so. More information, regarding the relative
>>> size, will be given later. *
>>>
>>> *WHERE DOES SUPERLIGHT COME FROM ?***
>>>
>>> *It comes out of black holes !***
>>>
>>> *First, I will describe how regular light is formed and then make
>>> the analogy for SuperLight. *
>>>
>>> *Regular electro–magnetic radiation or light is formed when electric
>>> monopoles give off energy. The electron in orbit about our atoms is
>>> an electric monopole — as it changes its' orbit it either gives off
>>> or absorbs energy in the form of electro– magnetic radiation.
>>> Sunlight is converted into electricity by this process in a solar
>>> cell. Just the opposite occurs in optical diodes, which convert
>>> electricity into light. *
>>>
>>> *So, electro magnetic radiation or visible light is produced when an
>>> electron (an electric monopole) lowers its orbit and releases its
>>> energy in the form of light. *
>>>
>>> *Now, I believe a similar event occurs in the extremely dense and
>>> hot matter found in black holes. It is theorized that black holes
>>> contain magnetic monopoles and when these extremely dense, extremely
>>> small, extremely energetic magnetic monopoles release energy by
>>> lowering their orbit they radiate magneto–electric radiation, our
>>> SuperLight. So black holes really are not so black. They are radiant
>>> beings of SuperLight. Of course SuperLight escapes the strong
>>> gravitation forces of the black holes because its velocity is the
>>> square of the velocity of light and it therefore, can easily
>>> escape._{7} *
>>>
>>> *The current scientific thinking is that in the center of every
>>> galaxy in the universe is a black hole. There are billions and
>>> billions of galaxies all around us, and they all are producing
>>> SuperLight. We are literally bathed in a three-dimensional dynamic
>>> energy field, or an "Ether" of SuperLight — a Dynamic Ether. *
>>>
>>> When you get into IONS, one should remember the negative ion fields
>>> that are created around a running Tesla coil that causes chilling
>>> effects. Se my paper on What is Heat that I wrote back in the 90s.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is Heat #2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For about 10 years I have been studying the effects of
>>>
>>> heating and cooling associated with the phase change of
>>>
>>> liquids with the hope of building a simple generator of
>>>
>>> electrical power around the phenomenon. The reason for this
>>>
>>> interest is based on the theory that energy can be extracted
>>>
>>> from the ambient background via thermal differentials. My
>>>
>>> line of thinking really took off back when I experimented
>>>
>>> with the all too familiar Peltier junction devices found in
>>>
>>> electronic cooling devices. Would you believe that most
>>>
>>> people do not understand how these devices move thermal
>>>
>>> energy through a current flow across a semiconductor
>>>
>>> junction. Historically we find that German physicist,
>>>
>>> Thomas Seebeck back in 1820 observed that when heat was
>>>
>>> applied to a junction of copper and steel wire that
>>>
>>> electrical energy resulted. Later in 1834 Jean Peltier
>>>
>>> discovered that when a direct current was applied to two
>>>
>>> dissimilar metals the junction got hot or cold. It was not
>>>
>>> until 1838 that Emil Lenz clearly showed the importance of
>>>
>>> both Seebeck and Peltier s discoveries by placing a drop of
>>>
>>> water on the junction of dissimilar metals which froze then
>>>
>>> melted when the polarity of the direct current was
>>>
>>> reversed. These discoveries remained dormant for over 100
>>>
>>> years because of the unavailability of semiconductor
>>>
>>> materials which could provide the wide temperature
>>>
>>> differentials. In the 1930 s semiconductor materials became
>>>
>>> available which revived the electric cooling principles. In
>>>
>>> the 1960 s many companies began building spot cooling
>>>
>>> devices and refrigerators based on these effects using a
>>>
>>> junction material of bismuth-telluride. Today more advanced
>>>
>>> materials are used with the basic parameters of being a pore
>>>
>>> thermal conductor but being an excellent electrical
>>>
>>> conductor. The dissimilar materials must provide a high
>>>
>>> coefficient of voltage temperature relationship. The first
>>>
>>> Peltier devices that I experimented with back about 10 years
>>>
>>> ago were built by Marlow Industries here in Dallas. With a
>>>
>>> small temperature differential across the device a weak
>>>
>>> current with an attendant voltage was developed. Increasing
>>>
>>> the differential provided a proportional increase in current
>>>
>>> and voltage. About 6 years ago I posted a chart of the
>>>
>>> wattage generated from two different size Peltier chips on
>>>
>>> the KeelyNet BBS. My curiosity was based on the puzzle of
>>>
>>> how electron flow could move thermal energy across the
>>>
>>> junctions and how electrical energy was produced by moving
>>>
>>> thermal energy across the junction. This is a directly
>>>
>>> reversible situation based on polarity.
>>>
>>> Now let us look at a very familiar parallel process used in
>>>
>>> refrigeration, cooling and heating devices employing phase
>>>
>>> change material such as water and refrigerants. We have
>>>
>>> always been led to believe that evaporating water provided
>>>
>>> cooling effects which is a mechanical process. By the same
>>>
>>> mechanical process we are provided heating effects by the
>>>
>>> condensation of a gas back to a liquid phase change. Would
>>>
>>> you believe that any material that undergoes a phase change
>>>
>>> provides an attendant electrical effect. Back in 1840
>>>
>>> Armstrong invented an electrostatic generator based on
>>>
>>> escaping steam through insulated nozzles which provided one
>>>
>>> of the most powerful devices of this type ever built.
>>>
>>> Popular belief was that this was a frictional process with
>>>
>>> the electrical output resulting from the steam friction
>>>
>>> passing through the nozzles. After reading an old (1920 s)
>>>
>>> Thermodynamics in Chemistry text book I realized that the
>>>
>>> phase change of materials was an electrical phenomenon and
>>>
>>> not purely mechanical. The atoms of the material lose or
>>>
>>> gain electrons in the process which accounts for the
>>>
>>> discrepancy in the energy equation when a material
>>>
>>> transitions between phases. More energy is present after
>>>
>>> the phase change back to the lower form or atomic state. The
>>>
>>> text book stated that this phenomenon could not be
>>>
>>> explained. When Jerry and I attended a Conference hosted by
>>>
>>> Hal Puthoff down in Austin back about 6 years ago a
>>>
>>> physicist from Austria presented a paper on the phase change
>>>
>>> of water and the attendant electrical phenomenon which is
>>>
>>> totally not understood by modern science. Now my suspicions
>>>
>>> were confirmed that phase changes of materials are an
>>>
>>> electrostatic phenomenon, which leads us to the fundamental
>>>
>>> question of, What is heat? We were told in the school
>>>
>>> that heat is the presence of energy and cool is the absence
>>>
>>> of energy. What is the form of this energy? Let us look at
>>>
>>> a very simple example of heating which may explain this
>>>
>>> process. When sunlight strikes an absorbing surface it is
>>>
>>> heated because electrons in the material are converted to
>>>
>>> photons which are emitted in the infrared band of light
>>>
>>> leaving the material in a net positive state or hot. The
>>>
>>> more electrons a material looses the hotter it becomes. Now
>>>
>>> the inverse situation is explored by evaporating some water
>>>
>>> from the surface of a material which leaves the surface in a
>>>
>>> net negative state or cold. Heat or cold is based on the
>>>
>>> ion relationship in the material. When we apply a flame
>>>
>>> (ionizing) to a material we cause the emission of photons
>>>
>>> which is basically stripping away electrons from the atomic
>>>
>>> structure causing a gross net positive situation to occur.
>>>
>>> Now we are getting a picture as to how an electric current
>>>
>>> across the Peltier junction can transport thermal energy
>>>
>>> (ions). Since the energy is in the form of presence or
>>>
>>> absence of electrons then it is a simple explanation as to
>>>
>>> how the process works. All phase change processes work the
>>>
>>> same way basically via ion transport and are not mechanical
>>>
>>> processes which we were taught. Everything in chemistry is
>>>
>>> an electrical or electrostatic process at the atomic level
>>>
>>> based on the ionized state of the atoms involved.
>>>
>>> At a Vanguard Science Roundtable discussion several years ago
>>>
>>> we talked about the ion wind method of fire fighting in
>>>
>>> which ionized air will extinguish a flame because of the
>>>
>>> cooling effects. Now we see Patents issued based on
>>>
>>> negative ion spraying of a surface causing it to rapidly
>>>
>>> cool because it becomes net negative charged. This is a
>>>
>>> very efficient method of air conditioning because an ion
>>>
>>> generator operates at very high voltages with very little
>>>
>>> current involved. It is possible to develop this ion
>>>
>>> transport (thermal energy) to provide direct electrical
>>>
>>> output from very subtle temperature differentials. Remember
>>>
>>> that this is a direct reversible process where a thermal
>>>
>>> differential will cause a development of current and voltage
>>>
>>> as in the Peltier device. I hope that this dialog will
>>>
>>> provide some food for thought out there on the KeelyNet.
>>>
>>> Please provide some feedback on this very interesting line
>>>
>>> of experimentation. Norm
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW, when the Patent Office started researching "Super Conductivity"
>>> they ran right into Tesla's work with the idea of using the Linde,
>>> liquid air process to provide a super conductive Tesla Coil
>>> primary. Tesla understood the power of a "Cold Sink" with electron
>>> densities of a very high order! "Hmmmmn"!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> More here on "Evanescent wave"! and "critical angle"!
>>> _https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_internal_reflection_
>>>
>>> On 1/16/2016 10:31 AM, Norman wrote:
>>>
>>> _https://physics.ucf.edu/~rep/publications/JournalPubs2010/ClearyGrating2010.pdf
>>> <https://physics.ucf.edu/%7Erep/publications/JournalPubs2010/ClearyGrating2010.pdf>_
>>>
>>> _https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_field_ This
>>> article shows how to approach "Zero Loss"! BTW, Moray, read
>>> this little note regarding your "micro sphere implosion"
>>> phenomenon! ("Evanescent wave coupling is used to excite, for
>>> example, _dielectric microsphere resonators
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dielectric_microsphere_resonators&action=edit&redlink=1>_.").
>>>
>>> On 1/16/2016 10:06 AM, Norman wrote:
>>>
>>> PS:
>>>
>>> Natural infrared
>>>
>>> Sunlight, at an effective temperature of 5,780 kelvins, is composed
>>> of nearly thermal-spectrum radiation that is slightly more than half
>>> infrared. At zenith, sunlight provides an _irradiance
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irradiance>_ of just over 1 _kilowatt
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt>_ per square meter at sea
>>> level. Of this energy, 527 watts is infrared radiation, 445 watts is
>>> _visible light <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_light>_, and
>>> 32 watts is _ultraviolet
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet>_ radiation._^[10]
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared#cite_note-10> _
>>>
>>> On the surface of Earth, at far lower temperatures than the surface
>>> of the Sun, almost all thermal radiation consists of infrared in
>>> various wavelengths. Of these natural thermal radiation processes
>>> only lightning and natural fires are hot enough to produce much
>>> visible energy, and fires produce far more infrared than
>>> visible-light energy.
>>> If you are going to collect it you have to know what you are dealing
>>> with!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/15/2018 1:18 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren,
>>>>
>>>> Glad to see someone is paying attention, I was waiting for someone
>>>> to pick up on that. People think of the Smith device as an
>>>> transformer but it is actually an antenna. This is also what
>>>> Hector talks about with his RV, RF energy modulating the phases to
>>>> usable electricity through transformation.
>>>>
>>>> Most of the Smith schematics are wrong, including Zilano's which is
>>>> probably a good thing or there would be many dead experimenters.
>>>>
>>>> Smith:
>>>>
>>>> HV Dc + modulated antenna = energy pump
>>>>
>>>> Don't forget to remember to remove the ions or nature creates
>>>> another equilibrium, in other words the more one loads it the
>>>> better the device works up to it's own engineering limitations.
>>>> Also design based on which ions one desires to work with the earth
>>>> ones or air. Of course the real extreme multiplication factor
>>>> comes from utilizing the return strike or neutral spike.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_field
>>>>
>>>> "Electromagnetic evanescent waves have been used to exert
>>>> optical radiation pressure
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure> on small
>>>> particles to trap them for experimentation, or to cool
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refrigeration> them to very low
>>>> temperatures,"
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetically_induced_transparency
>>>>
>>>> "The quantum interference in EIT can be exploited to laser cool
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_cooling> atomic particles,
>>>> even down to the quantum mechanical ground state of motion.^[2]
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetically_induced_transparency#cite_note-2>
>>>> This has recently been used to directly image individual atoms
>>>> trapped in an optical lattice
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_lattice>. ^[3]"
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetically_induced_transparency#cite_note-3>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren,
>>>>
>>>> Did you procure the buzzer that Norm gave the link for?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/14/2018 8:20 AM, Warren Keillor [email protected]
>>>> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .Mick
>>>>>
>>>>> That is most impressive for a SSB antenna.
>>>>> I sure could have used such a nice tool on my schooner while cruising.
>>>>> Do you notice how similar it is to some Don Smith, and Tesla coils?
>>>>> Zilano gives detailed building instructions, as well, for a very
>>>>> similar coil.
>>>>> There seems to be a whole school of study regarding this type of
>>>>> magnetic field transducer, or antenna, that we are not so familiar
>>>>> with.
>>>>> I am feeling like a chimpanzee contemplating a diode.
>>>>> We have a lot of work to do.
>>>>> Another wide band device/(antenna) might be Tesla's spiral pancake
>>>>> coil.
>>>>> I had good luck with my little experiments, using the induction
>>>>> stove top and a 3 hp treadmill motor, with a lamp cord pancake
>>>>> coil. The induction stove software sucked, but the basic concept
>>>>> was good of driving with induction/pancake.
>>>>> The current amplification seemed substantial, if the motor speed,
>>>>> and performance, was any indication.
>>>>> This other coil looks interesting,now, too.
>>>>> Cheers Warren
>>>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>>>>> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 5:27 PM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY]
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Norm,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes the Black Hole looks super cool for energy harvesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is kind of interesting is that this antenna has been
>>>>> around since at least 03 and there is very little information
>>>>> on how to build it. Then of course all the engineers poo
>>>>> pooing it claiming it's just a dummy load and the coax is
>>>>> doing all the work because they cannot possibly relate to the
>>>>> additional vector claim. The reviews of people using it claim
>>>>> it works very well in practice, lots of contacts but not all
>>>>> that well with theoretical testing ie with radiated output
>>>>> power etc. To me it looks like a 90 degree phase modulated
>>>>> diskone where one disk would be in counterphase to the other
>>>>> creating the longitudinal field aspect same as my wireless
>>>>> charging of HVAC caps. Would be interesting to see the
>>>>> current/voltage phase plot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lights a florescent pretty well at 4 watts
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWR5d7t0WAw
>>>>> http://www.ehant.qrz.ru/eh_phase.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/13/2018 6:51 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks! Mick, reminds me of the Sutton Black Hole Antennae
>>>>>> that was presented at the Tesla Symposium.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/12/2018 4:49 PM, Mick [email protected]
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is a magnetic antenna that functions similar to Tesla's
>>>>>>> wireless
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.eh-antenna.com/EH_HZ.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>