Re: [EVGRAY] Bifilar Coil for Electromagnets

Body

Interesting!  Yes, but he was not doing phase cancellation. just 
comparing efficiencies between the two coils!


On 8/27/2018 9:23 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
> Norm, You may find this interesting
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXKJjNAZDEM
>
>
> On 8/27/2018 7:06 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>
>> Hello all!    Since the subject of bifillar coils has surfaced again, 
>> Let me share a little experiment that was spurred by Tom Bearden when 
>> he published his Phase Conjugation ideas!  Out of curiosity, I wound 
>> a long solenoid air core coil with two strand 18 ga. stranded zip 
>> wire.   I was careful to wind the turns flat ,single layer tightly 
>> wound so that mutual induction between turns phase cancelled the 
>> vectors of the electric fields and the magnetic fields. what bifiliar 
>> should do.  I used a Ramer Impedance Bridge to get my winding to the 
>> 8 Ohm impedance needed for my 100 watt/channel stereo amplifier when 
>> fed by a pure sine wave of 400Hz signal.  (Note: I did not attempt to 
>> find a resonant point for the coil) The hook up is simple and You can 
>> watch on a scope the stereo amp output Channel A & B being exactly 
>> 180 degrees out of phase into the air core 8 Ohm / winding.  When 
>> brought up to 100 watt power dissipation / channel into the 8 Ohm 
>> impedance there was no detectable fields either electric nor magnetic 
>> fields although the power meters showed a total of 200 watts of 
>> energy being consumed.  What is your opinion as to the form that the 
>> power was converted into?? Yes there was associated heat generated in 
>> the air core windings. When phase cancellation removes the vectors 
>> from the equation, does the energy become Longitudinal wave without 
>> any detectable fields???
>>
>> https://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
>>
>> On 8/27/2018 6:17 AM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kone,
>>>
>>> The energy has to be input as two separate parts and then mixed into 
>>> a coherent single part to be extracted for driving the load. Look at 
>>> how Pierre Cotnoir did it. His device didn't require resonance which 
>>> makes it drive different loads without having to readjust 
>>> everything. He has overcome the tuning bitch. I'll try something 
>>> like that. But the progress is going very slow. This far two MOSFET 
>>> hex bridges are completed and working.
>>>
>>> Mixing energy is not just mixing voltage or mixing current as both 
>>> of those parts as well as time (actually change) are parts of 
>>> energy. Think of energy and not just the parts making up energy. 
>>> Energy comes in quite many types. It's the output energy that has to 
>>> be greater than the input energy to be able to extract free energy. 
>>> The excess free energy is then extracted out of the cosmic 
>>> background or aether of electrons (or positrons).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ole
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---In [email protected], <konehead@...> wrote :
>>>
>>> Hi James
>>> Perhaps "bifilar backemf" (the inductive kickback spikes from a 
>>> bifilar coil)
>>> Is of greater power when first you split then combine the inductive 
>>> kickback spikes produced.
>>> This means bifilar half A is fed the.pulsed DC power (or alternating 
>>> polarity pulsed DC for AC)
>>> And steering diodes capture the kickback spike into cap (s).
>>> Then the other half (B) of bifilar is not driven by direct power 
>>> feed but rather is only induced by bifilar half A.
>>> Now either combine kickback spikes from each into common cap or fill 
>>> up separate caps for each bifilar half.
>>> Could be creating a "coherence" condition as Ole speaks about, from 
>>> W B Smith writings.
>>> The capacitors filled need to be disconnected from the coil whenever 
>>> they discharge to load for real power to be seen with no reflection 
>>> back to primary input.
>>> Kone
>>
>
>