Body
That's really going to piss off the firefly's .
On Jul 19, 2018 7:06 PM, "[email protected] [EVGRAY]" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> coil banger , xenon strobe light , poor mans thyratron all you need are
> the right values and coil design and it keeps flashing forever .....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --In [email protected], <mkjekyll@...> wrote :
>
> Norm,
>
> right, just feeding the L1 of a coil with the rectified negative does not
> make it happen in a sustained manner so we do need something else. I
> speculate the magnetic quench is one answer which you proved. Do you know
> which Tesla patent or drawing has the horn gap magnet?
>
> These things are elusive then when they show up all the gear gets toasted
> so their appearance is bittersweet so far.
>
> I have not determined if for my experiments an all in one approach is
> better or rather to separate the transmitter and receiver like the
> Magnifying transmitter, in other words two separate grounds or a single one.
>
> Also have not yet defined the concept of the magnetostrictive material in
> a flux circuit with a perm magnet for energy harvest, do you know about
> this?
>
> It would be nice if these thyratrons could support higher frequencies but
> the pulse width is much more important anyways and for this they are fast
> and clean.
>
> On 7/18/2018 7:42 AM, Norman Wootan nwootan@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
>
> BTW! Tesla's magnetic horn gap was best method the eliminate any ring in
> the DC (negative) shots that make the longitudunal wave (radiant energy).
> Remember in my experiment with the Tesla Fire, I had reversed my HVDC power
> supply diodes so to output cathode (negative) output. X-ray tubes use
> anode (positive) supply.
>
> On 7/18/2018 9:37 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>
> Thanks! Mick & Kone, for now you are getting the picture of Neutral Spike
> and how difficult it is to capture it!
>
> On 7/17/2018 9:54 AM, Mick mkjekyll@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
>
> Kone,
>
> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy not just
> from the additional in the coil collapse but from the neutral spike Norm is
> on to. It is elusive because it requires a solid negative pulse for that
> huge power return strike just like lighting. With positive lightening
> there is no return strike. The return mucks up everything silicon so no
> wonder it has been completely engineered around. It's difficult to get
> solid negative with high voltage as the oscillations provide as you know
> the counter field so the proper neg polarity to input of a coil doesn't cut
> it but is a good start. This is why Tesla was using magnetic to fraction
> out the negative traveling wave which is what he referred to as radiant. I
> am sure certain materials also contribute to a more pure charge one way or
> the other just like with static charges. We just have to learn to use the
> proper materials in our coils for the expected outcomes.
>
> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>
>
>
>
> On 7/16/2018 11:20 PM, konehead@... [EVGRAY] wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Mick
> You wrote:
> "There seems to be a regular echo return that is about even with the pulse
> in and then another type that is more elusive more powerful and far more
> destructive to the sand state stuff."
>
> This what I found with pulsed dc flyback and backemf recovery
> circuits....something big is going on with same pulse width as primary, but
> delayed in time as like echo ( about 5 degrees delay you have to experiment
> to find it perfect)
>
> This the exact time and pulse width to extract power and do it in reverse
> polarity as primary (should be anyways since belief is fly back mixed using
> time with backemf opposin9g firce)
>
> Fill big cap at this time after rectifying...might help might confuse and
> distract don't worry just my two cents.
> Kone
>
>
>
>
>
>
>