Re: [EVGRAY] What is he trying to do here?

Body

Norm,

right, just feeding the L1 of a coil with the rectified negative does
not make it happen in a sustained manner so we do need something else. 
I speculate the magnetic quench is one answer which you proved.  Do you
know which Tesla patent or drawing has the horn gap magnet?

These things are elusive then when they show up all the gear gets
toasted so their appearance is bittersweet so far.

I have not determined if for my experiments an all in one approach is
better or rather to separate the transmitter and receiver like the
Magnifying transmitter, in other words two separate grounds or a single one.

Also have not yet defined the concept of the magnetostrictive material
in a flux circuit with a perm magnet for energy harvest, do you know
about this?

It would be nice if these thyratrons could support higher frequencies
but the pulse width is much more important anyways and for this they are
fast and clean.


On 7/18/2018 7:42 AM, Norman Wootan [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> BTW!  Tesla's magnetic horn gap was best method the eliminate any ring
> in the DC (negative)  shots that make the longitudunal wave (radiant
> energy). Remember in my experiment with the Tesla Fire, I had reversed
> my HVDC power supply diodes so to output cathode (negative) output. 
> X-ray tubes use anode (positive) supply.
>
>
> On 7/18/2018 9:37 AM, Norman Wootan wrote:
>>
>> Thanks! Mick & Kone, for now you are getting the picture of Neutral
>> Spike and how difficult it is to capture it!
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/2018 9:54 AM, Mick [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>  
>>>
>>> Kone,
>>>
>>> I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy not
>>> just from the additional in the coil collapse but from the neutral
>>> spike Norm is on to.  It is elusive because it requires a solid
>>> negative pulse for that huge power return strike just like
>>> lighting.  With positive lightening there is no return strike.  The
>>> return mucks up everything silicon so no wonder it has been
>>> completely engineered around.  It's difficult to get solid negative
>>> with high voltage as the oscillations provide as you know the
>>> counter field so the proper neg polarity to input of a coil doesn't
>>> cut it but is a good start.  This is why Tesla was using magnetic to
>>> fraction out the negative traveling wave which is what he referred
>>> to as radiant.  I am sure certain materials also contribute to a
>>> more pure charge one way or the other just like with static
>>> charges.  We just have to learn to use the proper materials in our
>>> coils for the expected outcomes.
>>>
>>> http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/16/2018 11:20 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mick
>>>> You wrote:
>>>> "There seems to be a regular echo return that is about even with
>>>> the pulse in and then another type that is more elusive more
>>>> powerful and far more destructive to the sand state stuff."
>>>>
>>>> This what I found with pulsed dc flyback and backemf recovery
>>>> circuits....something big is going on with same pulse width as
>>>> primary, but delayed in time as like echo ( about 5 degrees delay
>>>> you have to experiment to find it perfect)
>>>>
>>>> This the exact time and pulse width to extract power and do it in
>>>> reverse polarity as primary (should be anyways since belief is fly
>>>> back mixed using time with backemf opposin9g firce)
>>>>
>>>> Fill big cap at this time after rectifying...might help might
>>>> confuse and distract don't worry just my two cents.
>>>> Kone
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>