Re: [EVGRAY] What is he trying to do here?

Body

Kone,

I am working with the ground return so there is the extra energy not
just from the additional in the coil collapse but from the neutral spike
Norm is on to.  It is elusive because it requires a solid negative pulse
for that huge power return strike just like lighting.  With positive
lightening there is no return strike.  The return mucks up everything
silicon so no wonder it has been completely engineered around.  It's
difficult to get solid negative with high voltage as the oscillations
provide as you know the counter field so the proper neg polarity to
input of a coil doesn't cut it but is a good start.  This is why Tesla
was using magnetic to fraction out the negative traveling wave which is
what he referred to as radiant.  I am sure certain materials also
contribute to a more pure charge one way or the other just like with
static charges.  We just have to learn to use the proper materials in
our coils for the expected outcomes.

http://wxbrad.com/positive-lightning-why-its-so-dangerous/




On 7/16/2018 11:20 PM, [email protected] [EVGRAY] wrote:
>  
>
> Hi Mick
> You wrote:
> "There seems to be a regular echo return that is about even with the
> pulse in and then another type that is more elusive more powerful and
> far more destructive to the sand state stuff."
>
> This what I found with pulsed dc flyback and backemf recovery
> circuits....something big is going on with same pulse width as
> primary, but delayed in time as like echo ( about 5 degrees delay you
> have to experiment to find it perfect)
>
> This the exact time and pulse width to extract power and do it in
> reverse polarity as primary (should be anyways since belief is fly
> back mixed using time with backemf opposin9g firce)
>
> Fill big cap at this time after rectifying...might help might confuse
> and distract don't worry just my two cents.
> Kone
>
>