Body
Hi Ed,
I think I can see what you have been trying to tell us but not really
telling us about isolating the load from the supply, this is an old idea
that we talked about in the 1950s, but it does work. Let me explain:
Let's say we have a coil with both leads going to the common terminals
of 2 two-way changeover switches. From the load terminals of the
two-way changeover switches let's say that we connect the applied
voltage supply on the left side terminals, and we connect the load to
the right side terminals.
So in effect our coil leads are connected to the common terminals of the
2 two-way changeover switches, and then the coil can be switched on to
the left side terminals to the applied voltage supply, to get a pulse,
and then switched to the right side terminals to the load, to put the
resulting collapsing field spike into the load.
Every time we switch the changeover switches to isolate the coil from
the supply voltage, we supply a voltage spike to the load and by doing
it many times a second we have a useful OU output to the load.
Here is something from my notes that I came across while investigating
more about collapsing field technology some years ago. I don't know the
name of the author or owner of this document.
CFT- (Collapsing Field Technology) - Updated 2008
/In electrical systems, the term "back emf" actually refers to the equal
and opposite force field accompanying the "forward emf", in any
"symmetrical" electrical system.
In magnetic systems, the corresponding term is "forward and back mmf",
rather than "forward and back emf".
All rotating motors actually turn themselves from the broken symmetry
that is created inside them. The present engineers have been trained
that they must pay to put extra energy into the system, just to break
its symmetry. That of course is totally false. Otherwise, a rotating
electron (with its continual spin) would not spin.
In a normal motor, we are trained to put in a coil (say, there in the
back mmf region) and then we pay to put in a sudden surge of EM energy
to that coil, so that it momentarily overrides (cancels) the back mmf
force. In short, we momentarily make the system asymmetrical, so that
its net back mmf is less than its forward mmf.
That means that now the motor retains at least some of its excess
acceleration and excess angular momentum added to the flywheel and shaft
in its previous acceleration (forward mmf) zone, but we are "paying"
(the electric power grid) to have this occur.
Anyway, once that broken symmetry between forward and back mmfs is
there, with the back mmf deliberately reduced to less than the forward
mmf, the motor will self-rotate because of its own system asymmetry.
The fact that this effect has for over one hundred years been viewed as
a problem to be designed out of electrical systems, perhaps because of
greed, and no on had seriously considered it as a source of abundant
free energy. Everyone knew it was there, but no one recognized its
potential.
The standard, as manufactured, electrical generator systems can be
modified inexpensively to the Over-Unity / Asymmetrical design concept.
By the addition of a second set of commutator brushes and / or the
addition of a second slip ring assembly in the present electrical
generators,
Over-Unity output, or asymmetrical rotation is achievable in hours.
These additional elements are to collect / scavenger, the collapsing
fields (C.E.M.F.) of both the the armatures and field coils of present
electrical generator sets.
Present design throws away this tremendous amount of electrical energy
in the collapsing fields.(C.E.M.F.) You pay for it, why not get the
utility of it?
Everyone who makes use of electrical circuits have always considered the
collapsing field effect to be a nuisance because, when using a
mechanical relay coil in an electronic circuit, it would cause a current
to be pumped back into the circuit, creating havoc. One solution to the
problem of C.E.M.F. was to install a diode across the coil leads and
when the power was removed, the C.E.M.F. caused a current to flow which
passed through the diode and to be dissipated as heat in the coil itself
and not in the circuit.
On the armature / exciter element just install a second set of brushes
or slip rings the exact amount behind behind the driver units, needed to
collect the C.E.M.F., of the armature field collapse, to take it out of
the system for additional output generator utility.
On the field coil system, just install a second set of brushes / slip
rings the exact amount behind the original primary field coil system
needed to collect the C.E.M.F. of the field coils collapsing fields for
utility, when taken out of the unit as additional generator output utility.
The additional new C.E.M.F. outputs can easily be phased to the original
output system load wiring.
These modifications more than doubled the generators output power at
small modification cost / time, and no increase in operating costs.
This general design modification allows for most any currently
manufactured electrical generator set to be an over-unity design; and
with some additional external modifications a self-standing over-unity
configuration can be obtained on most commercial electric generators by
any competent electrical engineer. Why pay for fuel / power that you
have available in your generator system already?
Again, just collect (scavenger) the C.E.M.F. of the armature and field
coil"s collapses for far- over unity operation of these devices, and
with external circuit additions, stand alone, fuelless electrical power
is available to everyone, in the form of an off the shelf,
self-substaining, asymmetrical, electrical generator.
The same modifications can be made in most manufactured motors as they
can be made into generators easily.
Just scavage the armature and field coil collapses , control it with an
external circuit, and you have a stand-alone over-unity electrical
generator.
©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©
Below is a stationary "motionless electromagntic generator design, based
on the Alexander patent, that has been built experimentally; No far out
0 point vacuum explanations needed;
©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©
The best form would have no moving parts.
Looking at at the common transformer, and how it works, supplies the
answer.
In any kind of transformer, electricity is transferred between the two
coils by the magnetic field. When a coil is initially powered up or
switched off, that coil creates a magnetic field which causes an initial
rush of electricity, usually called a 'voltage spike.'
In conventional electronics, this voltage spike is suppressed to protect
the other components from damage. In collapsing field technology (CFT),
that voltage spike is harnessed, not suppressed.
If I take a DC signal generator power supply, and connect it to the
primary of the transformer, I can make a generator of sorts.
I'll turn on the DC signal in the primary coil windings for just an
instant, and then turn it off.
In the secondary there is a flux linkage following of the primary signal
that is some 90% of he input power.
But we can recover also, the secondary's field collapse for an
additional 90% of input power.
Thus, any transformer secondary will produce about 180% of the input
power in this mode, with a gradually applied quarter sine or sawtooth
wave shape. input DC signal.
But wait, we are throwing recoverable power away in the primary coil
winding's field collapse. By applying the DC power input signal and then
, when the input power is cut off, switch the primary winding's field
collapse to the output also, the primary field collapse contributes at
least another 90% to the output, for a grand total of about 270% gain,
in this design.
The DC power signal must only take primary winding up and then let go
(open ) at the top voltage.
Thus, the primary can be switched to the output to recover it's field
collapse, that is in synchronozation with the secondary's field collapse.
Simple electronic switching can accomplish all of these functions, at
little power usage and low cost.Therefore, the gain of a transformer
over-unity generator would probably be about 250% output power to input
power, and no mechanical motion needed.
Many old motors and generators could be adapted to the transformer
design, given above.
The armature must be fixed permanently stationary and the air gap
between armature and field coils filled with iron filings. The air gap
iron filings, or iron powder filling is to make the best use of the
primary's ( armature ) full flux power.
This makes for best transformer action and the highest power gain
possible with this conversion design.
Cooling, through holes, can be left in the air gap if necessary in these
units. The external switching electronic circuitry is the same as common
transformer design, above.
All we have done is to turn the motor / generator into a reasonable
transformer.
What is happening in this design is that for one"up"( power signal ) in
the primary coil, we get the "up" ( field build ) in the secondary coil
and the " downs" ( field collapses ) of both the secondary and primary
coil as output power
Think of the primary coils as coupled "springs" and it will all be clear.
This transformer / generator design has been the nature of
electromagnetic coils all the time--we just never saw it.
And if the unit is actuated 60 times a second, allowing for the
counter-electromotive force field collapses, it makes the standard
household 60Hz electrical generator.
This design concept is the natural last step after recovery of secondary
collapses was introduced in generator designs.
The same gain principle and results could then be achieved in capacitor
systems.
The charge (up ) cycle from the secondary plate and the two discharge
cycles from both the secondary and primary plates would be the output
power.
The basic external switching electronics is generally the same as in the
transformer designs.
These designs are in the basic nature of energy storage / transfer
elements---one input allows for the utility of the one input transfer
and the two storage collapses or discharges as output power ( about 300%
gain ) /
George